The Docket · Government Meeting · DKT-2026-002467

On the agenda: Vallejo Special Police Oversight & Accountability Commission — LICENSE PLATE READER (Nov 5)

Name: On the agenda: Vallejo Special Police Oversight & Accountability Commission — LICENSE PLATE READER (Nov 5)
Start: 2026-11-05
End: 2026-11-05
Location: Special Police Oversight & Accountability Commission

⚠ Agenda Watch Vallejo, California · Thursday, November 5, 2026 — in 3 days

About this record

The published agenda for this November 5 meeting contains: "LICENSE PLATE READER", "AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE", "Automated License Plate", "ALPR". This is the public record BEFORE the vote — read the document, then show up. Public comment is where cancellations start.

WhenThursday, November 5, 2026
Check the agenda document for the meeting time.

WhereVallejo, California

BodySpecial Police Oversight & Accountability Commission

On the record“LICENSE PLATE READER”“AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE”“Automated License Plate”“ALPR”“license plate recognition”“facial recognition”

The agenda, word for word

Government public record — the full text of the published document, archived November 3, 2026. Gold highlighting of key terms is ours, not the original’s. Read the original document ↗

56 pages · scroll to read

Page 1 of 56

P OLIC E OVER SIGHT &
A C C OU NTA BIL ITY C OM M ISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
NOVEMBER 5, 2026

HYBRID MEETING
www.Cityofvallejo.net

COMMISSIONERS
John Lewis (District 6), Chair
Renee Sykes (District 4) Vice Chair
Rommye Qualls (District. 1)
VACANT (District 2)
VACANT (District 3)
Derek Roy (District 5)
Naomi Yun (At-Large)
Melvin Jones (Community Alternate)

6:30 PM
Council Chambers
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590

NOTICE: Members of the Public will be able to
participate in-person or remotely via Zoom

City Hall and the Council Chambers will be open to
members of the public 30 minutes prior to the start of
the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the Public
may provide public comments during the
Meeting in person or via ZOOM
(https://ZoomRegular.Cityofvallejo.net), or
via phone, by dialing (669) 900-6833.

For additional instructions on how to speak remotely
during public comment, please
visit, www.cityofvallejo.net/publiccomment

VIEW THE MEETING:
There are four different ways you can view this public
meeting:
• In Person
• Watch Vallejo local channel 28
• Stream from the City
website: www.cityofvallejo.net/Streaming
• Join the Zoom webinar:
https://ZoomRegular.Cityofvallejo.net

Scan QR code for live captions and translation in Spanish
and Tagalog.

Hybrid Options are available for members of the public to participate. To participate remotely
Option to Join by Computer
From your browser go to
https://ZoomRegular.CityofVallejo.net to launch and
join the zoom application.
Meeting ID: 914 0075 0676#
Meeting Password: 131313

Option to Join by Phone
Dial (669) 900-6833
Enter Meeting ID: 914 0075 0676#
Meeting Password: 131313
Press *9 to digitally raise your hand from the phone.
Press *6 to unmute/mute

Any supplemental writing related to an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting that is distributed to all or a
majority of all members of the Commission less than 72 hours before the meeting will be posted concurrently on the City’s
website at www.cityofvallejo.net/agendas Written material distributed during the meeting, will be available at the
meeting if prepared by the City or after the meeting if prepared by someone else. Such materials may be obtained from the
Commission Secretary.

Page 1 of 56

Page 2 of 56

Vallejo City Council Chambers ADA compliant. Devices for the hearing impaired are available from the City
Clerk. Requests for disability related modifications or accommodations, aids or services may be made by a person with a
disability to the City Clerk's office no less than 72 hours prior to the meeting as required by Section 202 of the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof

AGENDA
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE POLICE OVERSIGHT & ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION:
You are hereby notified that I hereby call the Police Oversight & Accountability Commission in special session to consider only the
matters stated on the agenda listed below. NOTICE: Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Commission
concerning any item listed on the agenda before or during consideration of that item. No other items may be discussed at this special
meeting

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

COMMUNITY FORUM
The Community Forum is an opportunity to address the POAC on any matter for which another opportunity
to speak is not provided on the agenda, and which is within the jurisdiction of the Commission to resolve.
Any interested members of the public desiring to communicate with thePOAC as part of the First Community
Forum may do so in person by signing in to the Public Speaker's kiosk located in the back of the Council
Chambers or via ZOOM:(https://ZoomRegular.Cityofvallejo.net), Option to join by phone: Dial (669) 9006833. Enter Meeting ID: 914 0075 0676#. Press * 9 to digitally raise your hand from the phone. Press *6 to
unmute/mute. For additional instructions on how to speak remotely during public comment, please visit,
www.cityofvallejo.net/publiccomment. In person speakers will be recognized first. When called upon, each
speaker should step to the podium, state his/her name for the record. Each speaker limited to a maximum of
three minutes pursuant to Vallejo Municipal Code Section 2.02.300.

CONSENT CALENDAR AND APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF
OCTOBER 8, 2026 AND THE AGENDA FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 5, 2026
Recommendation: Approve minutes for the Regular meeting of October 8, 2026
and the Agenda for the Special meeting of November 5, 2026
Contact: Nalungo Conley, Assistant City Manager
[email protected]

REPORT OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION

REPORT OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIAISON

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY

ATTORNEY'S REPORT

ACTION CALENDAR

Page 2 of 56

Page 3 of 56

NOTICE: Members of the public wishing to address the POAC on Action Calendar Items may do so in person
by signing in to the Public Speaker's kiosk located in the back of the Council Chambers or via ZOOM
(https://ZoomRegular.Cityofvallejo.net), or via phone, by dialing (669) 900-6833. Enter Meeting ID: 914 0075
0676#. Press *9 to digitally raise your hand from the phone. Press *6 to unmute/mute. For additional
instructions
on
how
to
speak
remotely
during
public
comment,
please
visit,
www.cityofvallejo.net/publiccomment. Each speaker is limited to five minutes pursuant to Vallejo Municipal
Code Section 2.02.420 or as approved and announced by theChair. In person speakers will be recognized
first

CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 341PUBLIC SAFETY VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, 426- AUTOMATED
LICENSE PLATE READERS (ALPRS), AND 434- GUN SHOT AUDIO
DETECTION SYSTEM, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS "FLOCK POLICIES" AND
PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION FOR FUTURE
CONSIDERATION RECOMMENDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT
RECOMMENDING TO THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL THE CONTINUATION
OF USING FLOCK TECHNOLOGY
Recommendation: Review and discuss Policies 341, 426, 434, and 436;

receive public comment; identify any required revisions, safeguards,
reporting obligations, or conditions; and adopt a recommendation for
transmittal to the City Council concerning the continued use of Flock
Technology in the City of Vallejo.
Contact: Jerome Bautista, Captain VPD
[email protected]
B

CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 436TECHNOLOGY USE AUDITS AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION
RECOMMENDING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT RECOMMENDING THE
POLICY TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE
Recommendation: To Recommend to the Chief of Police, adoption of this policy
in whole or in part, or in the alternative, not adopt this policy.
Contact: Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Chief VPD
[email protected]

CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO VALLEJO POLICE
DEPARTMENT POLICY 310- CANINES, ADOPT A RESOLUTION
RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED
CHANGES TO THE POLICY
Recommendation: To recommend proposed changes to the Chief of Police or in
the alternative, not recommend changes.
Contact: Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Chief VPD
[email protected]

CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 207TRAINING POLICY, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, NOT RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO
THE POLICY

Page 3 of 56

Page 4 of 56

Recommendation: Provide a recommendation or in the alternative, not
recommend changes to the Chief of Police for Policy 207
Contact: Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Chief VPD
[email protected]
11

INFORMATION CALENDAR

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

CLOSED SESSION
A

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/DISMISSAL/RELEASE Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957 (b)(1) - Discussion and Consideration of
Complaints and Reports. To discuss complaints, charges, investigations, and
discipline (unless the employee requests an open public session) involving
Vallejo Police Department employees, and information deemed confidential
under California Penal Code Sections 832.5-832.8 and Evidence Code Section
1040.
1. Review of Complaints
a. CC 2026-77
b. CC 2026-78
c. CC 2026-79
d. CC 2026-80
e. CC 2026-81
f. CC 2026-82
g. CC 2026 83
h. CC 2026 84

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURNMENT

Page 4 of 56

Page 5 of 56

ADDITIONAL CITY INFORMATION
Members of the public can:
•
Like us on Facebook and Instagram (@cityofvallejo)
•
Sign up to receive City Communications via e-mail (www.cityofvallejo.net/subscribe)
•
Sign up for emergency alerts at: alertsolano.com
I, Dawn G. Abrahamson, City Clerk do hereby certify that I have caused a true copy of the above notice and agenda to be delivered to

John Lewis (District 6), Chair
Renee Sykes (District 4) Vice Chair
Rommye Qualls (District. 1)
VACANT (District 2)
VACANT (District 3)
Derek Roy (District 5)
Naomi Yun (At-Large)
Melvin Jones (Community Alternate),
at the time and in the manner prescribed by law and that this agenda was posted at City Hall, 555 Santa Clara Street, CA at
2:45 p.m., Friday, October 30, 2026.

Dated: Friday, October 30, 2026
Dawn G. Abrahamson, City Clerk

Page 5 of 56

Page 6 of 56

POLICE OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
REGUALR MEETING
October 8, 2026
Council Chambers
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, California

1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Lewis, Sykes, Hybels, Qualls, Roy, and Yun
Absent: Alternate Jones,
Staff present: Assistant City Manager Conley and Chief Assistant City Attorney Randy Risner
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AND MINUTES
Action: Moved by Vice-Chair Sykes, seconded by Chair Lewis, and carried unanimously by all
members present to approve the minutes for the Special meeting of September 24th, and the
agenda for the Regular meeting of October 8, 2026.
5. REPORT OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND MEMBERS OF THE POLICE OVERSIGHT
AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION
6. REPORT OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
A. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation for Police Oversight & Accountability
Commission members
7. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY
A. Provided an update on notification system on POACs “My Vallejo” webpage
8. ATTORNEY’S REPORT
9. ACTION CALENDAR
10. INFORMATION CALENDAR
A. DISCUSSION OF POLICY 341- PUBLIC SAFETY VIDEO SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEMS
B. DISCUSSION OF POLICY 426- AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS (ALPRS)
Page | 1
Page 6 of 56

Page 7 of 56

C. DISCUSSION OF POLICY 434- GUN SHOT AUDIO DETECTION SYSTEM
11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
12. CLOSED SESSION
The Commission convened in closed session at approximately 8:19 p.m.
The Commission returned to open session at approximately 9:14 p.m.
Chief Assistant City Attorney Risner reported out the following POAC recommendations from
closed session:
1. Review of Complaints:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.

CC 2026-68 – Internal
CC 2026-69 – Internal
CC 2026-70 – Internal
CC 2026-71 – Internal
CC 2026-73 – Internal
CC 2026-74 – Internal
CC 2026-75 – Internal

2. Consideration of Investigative Report for Recommendation
• IA2025-03 – Accept findings with no recommendations
13. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m.
________________________________
JOHN LEWIS, CHAIR
ATTEST:
___________________________________
NALUNGO CONLEY
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

Page | 2
Page 7 of 56

Page 8 of 56

ACTION ITEM 10.A.

DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:

November 5, 2026
Chair and Members of the Police Oversight & Accountability Commission
Jerome Bautista, Police Captain
CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 341- PUBLIC SAFETY
VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, 426- AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS
(ALPRS), AND 434- GUN SHOT AUDIO DETECTION SYSTEM, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
"FLOCK POLICIES" AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION
FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION RECOMMENDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT
RECOMMENDING TO THE VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL THE CONTINUATION OF USING
FLOCK TECHNOLOGY

RECOMMENDATION

Review and discuss Policies 341, 426, 434, and 436; receive public comment; identify any required
revisions, safeguards, reporting obligations, or conditions; and adopt a recommendation for transmittal
to the City Council concerning the continued use of Flock Technology in the City of Vallejo.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION

In July 2026, the City Council directed the Police Oversight & Accountability Commission (POAC) to meet
jointly with the Surveillance Advisory Board (SAB), review the policies governing the City of Vallejo’s use
of Flock Technology, and develop a recommendation regarding its continued use. This review brings
together the POAC’s public-safety oversight responsibilities and the SAB’s surveillance-technology
expertise. Following an informal joint meeting on October 15, 2026, the full POAC is now asked to
consider the applicable policies, identify any remaining concerns, receive public comment, and
determine what recommendation should be forwarded to the City Council.
At the October 15, 2026 informal joint meeting, the POAC and SAB reviewed the policies associated with
Flock Technology. The discussion allowed both bodies to examine the proposed governance framework,
clarify their respective concerns, and prepare the matter for deliberation by the full POAC. The meeting
also included presentation of a proposed technology-use audit policy developed by an SAB Ad-Hoc SubCommittee.
The policies under review are:
• Policy 341 — Public Safety Video Surveillance: Governs the use of public-safety videosurveillance systems.
• Policy 426 — Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR): Governs the collection, access, use,
retention, and management of automated license-plate-reader information.

Page 8 of 56

Page 9 of 56

Date: November 5, 2026
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 341- PUBLIC

SAFETY VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, 426- AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE
READERS (ALPRS), AND 434- GUN SHOT AUDIO DETECTION SYSTEM,
OTHERWISE KNOWN AS "FLOCK POLICIES" AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO
STAFF TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION
RECOMMENDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT RECOMMENDING TO THE
VALLEJO CITY COUNCIL THE CONTINUATION OF USING FLOCK
TECHNOLOGY
Page 2

• Policy 434 — Gunshot Audio Detection System: Governs the use of acoustic gunshot-detection
technology.
• Policy 436 — Technology Use Audit: Establishes an audit framework for reviewing the Vallejo
Police Department’s use of covered technology.
This current meeting should provide an opportunity for commissioners to raise outstanding policy
questions and for community members to offer feedback. The POAC will consider that input together
with the discussion from the informal joint meeting and the text of Policies 341, 426, 434, and 436. If
additional information is required to assist in that discussion, staff will work to provide at the next
scheduled regular meeting of POAC.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact for this item
ATTACHMENTS
1.
341 Public_Safety_Video_Surveillance_System
2.
426 Automated_License_Plate_Readers__ALPRs_
3.
434 Gun_Shot_Audio_Detection_System (2)

CONTACT
Jerome Bautista, Captain VPD
[email protected]

Page 9 of 56

Page 10 of 56

Policy

Vallejo Police Department

341

Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Public Safety Video Surveillance System
341.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This policy provides guidance for the placement and monitoring of department public safety video
surveillance, as well as the storage and release of the captured images.
This policy only applies to overt, marked public safety video surveillance systems operated by
the Department. It does not apply to mobile audio/video systems, covert audio/video systems or
any other image-capturing devices used by the Department.
341.2 POLICY
The Vallejo Police Department operates a public safety video surveillance system to complement
its anti-crime strategy, to effectively allocate and deploy personnel, and to enhance public safety
and security in public areas. Cameras may be placed in strategic locations throughout the City to
detect and deter crime, to help safeguard against potential threats to the public, to help manage
emergency response situations during natural and man-made disasters and to assist City officials
in providing services to the community.
Video surveillance in public areas will be conducted in a legal and ethical manner while recognizing
and protecting constitutional standards of privacy.
341.3 OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
Only department-approved video surveillance equipment shall be utilized. Members authorized to
monitor video surveillance equipment should only monitor public areas and public activities where
no reasonable expectation of privacy exists. The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall
approve all proposed locations for the use of video surveillance technology and should consult
with and be guided by legal counsel as necessary in making such determinations.
341.3.1 PLACEMENT AND MONITORING
Camera placement will be guided by the underlying purpose or strategy associated with the overall
video surveillance plan. As appropriate, the Chief of Police should confer with other affected City
divisions and designated community groups when evaluating camera placement. Environmental
factors, including lighting, location of buildings, presence of vegetation, or other obstructions,
should also be evaluated when determining placement.
The cameras shall only record video images and not sound. Recorded images may be used for
a variety of purposes, including criminal investigations and monitoring of activity around highvalue or high-threat areas. The public video surveillance system may be useful for the following
purposes:
(a)

To prevent, deter, and identify criminal activity.

(b)

To target identified areas of gang and narcotics complaints or activity.

(c)

To respond to critical incidents.

Public Safety Video Surveillance System - 1

Page 10 of 56

Page 11 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Public Safety Video Surveillance System

(d)

To assist in identifying, apprehending, and prosecuting offenders.

(e)

To document officer and offender conduct during interactions to safeguard the rights
of the public and officers.

(f)

To augment resources in a cost-effective manner.

(g)

To monitor pedestrian and vehicle traffic activity.

Images from each camera should be recorded in a manner consistent with the underlying
purpose of the particular camera. Images should be transmitted to monitors installed in the
Watch Commander’s office and the Communications Center. When activity warranting further
investigation is reported or detected at any camera location, the available information should be
provided to responding officers in a timely manner. The Watch Commander or trained personnel
in the Communications Center are authorized to adjust the cameras to more effectively view a
particular area for any legitimate public safety purpose.
The Chief of Police may authorize video feeds from the public safety video surveillance system to
be forwarded to a specified location for monitoring by other than police personnel, such as allied
government agencies, road or traffic crews, or fire or emergency operations personnel.
Unauthorized recording, viewing, reproduction, dissemination, or retention is prohibited.
341.3.2 CAMERA MARKINGS
All public areas monitored by public safety surveillance equipment shall be marked in a
conspicuous manner with appropriate signs to inform the public that the area is under police
surveillance. Signs should be well lit, placed appropriately and without obstruction to ensure
visibility.
341.3.3 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER TECHNOLOGY
The Department may elect to integrate its public safety video surveillance system with other
technology to enhance available information. Systems such as gunshot detection, incident
mapping, crime analysis, license plate recognition, facial recognition and other video-based
analytical systems may be considered based upon availability and the nature of department
strategy.
The Department should evaluate the availability and propriety of networking or otherwise
collaborating with appropriate private sector entities and should evaluate whether the use
of certain camera systems, such as pan-tilt-zoom systems and video enhancement or other
analytical technology, requires additional safeguards. The Department currently utilizes Flock
Condor pan-tilt-zoom cameras. Police Personnel shall not provide to the public the location or
description of Condor Cameras.
341.4 VIDEO SUPERVISION
Supervisors should monitor video surveillance access and usage to ensure members are
within department policy and applicable laws. Supervisors should ensure such use and access
is appropriately documented.

Public Safety Video Surveillance System - 2

Page 11 of 56

Page 12 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Public Safety Video Surveillance System

341.5 STORAGE AND RETENTION OF MEDIA
All downloaded media shall be stored in a secure area with access restricted to authorized
persons. A recording needed as evidence shall be copied to a suitable medium and booked into
evidence in accordance with established evidence procedures. All actions taken with respect to
retention of media shall be appropriately documented.
The type of video surveillance technology employed and the manner in which recordings are
used and stored will affect retention periods. The recordings should be stored and retained in
accordance with the established records retention schedule and for a minimum of one year. Prior to
destruction, written consent shall be obtained from the City Attorney. If recordings are evidence in
any claim filed or any pending litigation, they shall be preserved until pending litigation is resolved
(Government Code § 34090.6).
Any recordings needed as evidence in a criminal or civil proceeding shall be copied to a suitable
medium and booked into evidence in accordance with current evidence procedures.
341.5.1 EVIDENTIARY INTEGRITY
All downloaded and retained media shall be treated in the same manner as other evidence.
Media shall be accessed, maintained, stored and retrieved in a manner that ensures its integrity
as evidence, including strict adherence to chain of custody requirements. Electronic trails,
including encryption, digital masking of innocent or uninvolved individuals to preserve anonymity,
authenticity certificates and date and time stamping, shall be used as appropriate to preserve
individual rights and to ensure the authenticity and maintenance of a secure evidentiary chain of
custody.
341.6 RELEASE OF VIDEO IMAGES
All recorded video images gathered by the public safety video surveillance equipment are for the
official use of the Vallejo Police Department.
Requests for recorded video images from the public or the media shall be processed in the same
manner as requests for department public records.
Requests for recorded images from other law enforcement agencies shall be referred to the Watch
Commander for release in accordance with a specific and legitimate law enforcement purpose.
Recorded video images that are the subject of a court order or subpoena shall be processed in
accordance with the established department subpoena process.

Public Safety Video Surveillance System - 3

Page 12 of 56

Page 13 of 56

Policy

Vallejo Police Department

426

Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
426.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for the capture, storage and use of digital data
obtained through the use of Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) technology.
426.2 DEFINITIONS

•

Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) : A device that uses cameras and computer
technology to compare digital images to lists of known information of interest.

•

ALPR Operator : Trained Department members who may utilize ALPR system/
equipment. ALPR operators may be assigned to any position within the Department,
and the ALPR Administrator may order the deployment of the ALPR systems for use
in various efforts.

•

ALPR Administrator : The Investigations Bureau Captain or the Chief's designee,
serves as the ALPR Administrator for the Department.

•

Hot List : A list of license plates associated with vehicles of interest compiled from one
or more databases including, but not limited to, NCIC, CA DMV, Local BOLO's, etc.

•

Vehicles of Interest : Including, but not limited to vehicles which are reported as
stolen; display stolen license plates or tags; vehicles linked to missing and/or wanted
persons and vehicles flagged by the Department of Motor Vehicle Administration or
law enforcement agencies.

•

Detection : Data obtained by an ALPR of an image (such as a license plate) within
public view that was read by the device, including potential images (such as the plate
and description of vehicle on which it was displayed), and information regarding the
location of the ALPR system at the time of the ALPR's read.

•

Hit : Alert from the ALPR system that a scanned license plate number may be in
the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) or other law enforcement database for
a specific reason including, but not limited to, being related to a stolen car, wanted
person, missing person, domestic violation protective order or terrorist-related activity.

426.3 ADMINISTRATION
The ALPR technology, also known as License Plate Recognition (LPR), allows for the automated
detection of license plates along with the vehicle make, model, color and unique identifiers through
the Vallejo Police Department's ALPR's system and the vendor's vehicle identification technology.
The technology is used by the Vallejo Police Department to convert data associated with vehicle
license plates and vehicle descriptions for official law enforcement purposes, including identifying
stolen or wanted vehicles, stolen license plates and missing persons. It may also be used to gather
information related to active warrants, suspect interdiction and stolen property recovery.
All installation and maintenance of ALPR equipment, as well as ALPR data retention and
access, shall be managed by the Department Information Technology Manager. The Department

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 1

Page 13 of 56

Page 14 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

Information Technology Manager will assign members under his/her command to administer the
day-to-day operation of the ALPR equipment and data.
426.3.1 ALPR ADMINISTRATOR
The Administration Division Commander shall be responsible for developing guidelines and
procedures to comply with the requirements of Civil Code § 1798.90.5 et seq. This includes, but
is not limited to (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53):
(a)

A description of the job title or other designation of the members and independent
contractors who are authorized to use or access the ALPR system or to collect ALPR
information.

(b)

Training requirements for authorized users.

(c)

A description of how the ALPR system will be monitored to ensure the security of the
information and compliance with applicable privacy laws.

(d)

Procedures for system operators to maintain records of access in compliance with
Civil Code § 1798.90.52.

(e)

The title and name of the current designee in overseeing the ALPR operation.

(f)

Working with the Custodian of Records on the retention and destruction of ALPR data.

(g)

Ensuring this policy and related procedures are conspicuously posted on
the department’s website.

426.4 OPERATIONS
Use of an ALPR is restricted to the purposes outlined below. Department members shall not use,
or allow others to use the equipment or database records for any unauthorized purpose (Civil
Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53)
(a)

An ALPR shall only be used for official law enforcement business.

(b)

Police Personnel shall not provide the public the location or description of the ALPR's.

(c)

An ALPR may be used in conjunction with any routine patrol operation or criminal
investigation.Reasonable suspicion or probable cause is not required before using an
ALPR.

(d)

Partial license plates and unique vehicle descriptions reported during major crimes
should be entered into the ALPR system in an attempt to identify suspect vehicles.

(e)

The officer should verify an ALPR response through the California Law Enforcement
Telecommunications System (CLETS) or dispatch before taking enforcement action
based solely on an ALPR alert. Because the ALPR alert may relate to a vehicle and
may not relate to the person operating the vehicle, officers are reminded that they
need to have reasonable suspicion and/or probable cause to make an enforcement
stop of any vehicle. (For example, if a vehicle is entered into the system because of
its association with a wanted individual, Officers should attempt to visually match the
driver to the description of the wanted subject prior to making the stop or should have
another legal basis for making the stop.)

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 2

Page 14 of 56

Page 15 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

(f)

Designation of hot lists to be utilized by the ALPR system shall be made by the
ALPR Administrator or his/her designee. Hot lists shall be obtained or compiled from
sources as may be consistent with the purposes of the ALPR system set forth in
this policy. Hot lists utilized by the Department's ALPR system may be updated by
agency sources more frequently than the Department may be uploading them and thus
the Department's ALPR system will not have access to real time data. Occasionally,
there may be errors in the ALPR system's read of a license plate,therefore an alert
alone shall not be a basis for a police action (other than following the vehicle of
interest).

Prior to initiation of a stop of a vehicle or other intervention based on an alert, Department members
shall undertake the following:
(a)

Verification of status on a hot list; An officer must receive confirmation, from a Vallejo
Police Department Communications Dispatcher or other Department computer device,
that the license plate is still stolen, wanted, or otherwise of interest before proceeding
(absent exigent circumstances).

(b)

Visual verification of license plate number; Officers shall visually verify that the license
plate of interest matches the image of the license plate number captured (read) by
the ALPR, including both the alphanumeric characters of the license plate, state of
issue, and vehicle descriptors before proceeding. Department members alerted to the
fact that an observed motor vehicle's license plate is entered as a hot plate (hit) in
a specific BOLO (be on the lookout) list are required to make a reasonable effort to
confirm that a wanted person is actually in the vehicle and/or that a reasonable basis
exists before a Department member would have a lawful basis to stop the vehicle.

Department members will clear all stops from hot list alerts by indicating the positive ALPR hit,
i.e., with an arrest or other enforcement action. If it is not obvious in the text of the call as to the
correlation of the ALPR hit and the arrest, then the Department member shall update with the
Communications Dispatcher and original person and/or a crime analyst inputting the vehicle in
the hot list (hit).
General hot lists (SVS, SFR, and SLR) will be automatically downloaded into the ALPR system a
minimum of once a day with the most current data overwriting the old data.
(a)

All entries and updates of specific hot lists within the ALPR system will be documented
by the requesting Department member within the appropriate general offense report.
As such, specific hot lists shall be approved by the ALPR Administrator (or his/her
designee) before initial entry within the ALPR system. The updating of such a list within
the ALPR system shall thereafter be accomplished pursuant to the approval of the
Department member's immediate supervisor. The hits from these data sources should
be viewed as informational; created solely to bring the officers attention to specific
vehicles that have been associated with criminal activity.

All hot plates and suspect information entered into the ALPR system will contain the following
information as a minimum:
(a)

Entering Department member's name

(b)

Related case number.

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 3

Page 15 of 56

Page 16 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

(c)

Short synopsis describing the nature of the originating call

To ensure proper operation and facilitate oversight of the ALPR system, all users will
be required to have individual credentials for access and use of the systems and/or
data, which has the ability to be fully audited.

Permitted/Impermissible Uses.
(a)

The ALPR system, and all data collected, is the property of the Vallejo Police
Department. Department personnel may only access and use the ALPR system
for official and legitimate law enforcement purposes consistent with this policy. The
following uses of the ALPR system are specifically prohibited:
1.

Invasion of Privacy: Except when done pursuant to a court order such as a
search warrant, is a violation of this policy to utilize the ALPR to record license
plates except those of vehicles that are exposed to public view (e.g., vehicles on
a public road or street, or that are on private property but whose license plate(s)
are visible from a public road, street, or a place to which members of the public
have access, such as the parking lot of a shop or other business establishment).

Harassment or Intimidation : It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system
to harass and/or intimidate any individual or group.

Use Based on a Protected Characteristic : It is a violation of this policy to use the
ALPR system or associated scan files or hot lists solely because of a person's,
or group's race, gender, religion, political affiliation, nationality, ethnicity, sexual
orientation, disability, or other classification protected by law.

Personal Use : It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system or associated
scan files or hot lists for any personal purpose.

First Amendment Rights : It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system
or associated scan files or hot lists for the purpose or known effect of infringing
upon First Amendment rights.

Reproductive Health Care: It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system
to arrest, cite, prosecute, intimidate or harass any person who is seeking or
intends to seek reproductive health care services in California.

Anyone who engages in an impermissible use of the ALPR system or associated scan files or
hot lists may be subject to:
(a)

Criminal prosecution,

(b)

Civil liability, and/or

(c)

Administrative sanctions, up to and including termination, pursuant to and consistent
with the relevant collective bargaining agreements and Department policies.

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 4

Page 16 of 56

Page 17 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

426.5 DATA COLLECTION AND RETENTION
The Investigations Bureau Captain is responsible for ensuring systems and processes are in place
for the proper collection and retention of ALPR data. Data will be transferred from vehicles to the
designated storage in accordance with Department procedures.
All ALPR data downloaded to the server should be stored for no longer than one year, and in
accordance with the established records retention schedule. Thereafter, ALPR data should be
purged unless it has become, or it is reasonable to believe it will become, evidence in a criminal or
civil action or is subject to a discovery request or other lawful action to produce records. In those
circumstances the applicable data should be downloaded from the server onto portable media
and booked into evidence.
ALPR vendor, Flock Safety will store the data (data hosting) and ensure proper maintenance and
security of data stored in their data towers. Flock Safety will purge their data at the end of the 30
days of storage. However, this will not preclude VPD from maintaining any relevant vehicle data
obtained from the system after that period pursuant to the established City of Vallejo retention
schedule mentioned above or outlined elsewhere. Relevant vehicle data are scans corresponding
to the vehicle of interest on a hot list.
Restrictions on use of ALPR data:
(a)

Information gathered or collected, and records retained by Flock Safety cameras
or any other Department ALPR system will not be sold, accessed, or used for any
purpose other than legitimate law enforcement or public safety purposes.

426.6 ACCOUNTABILITY AND SAFEGUARDS
All data will be closely safeguarded and protected by both procedural and technological means.
The Vallejo Police Department will observe the following safeguards regarding access to and use
of stored data (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53):
(a)

All non-law enforcement requests for access to stored ALPR data shall be processed
in accordance with applicable law.

(b)

All ALPR data downloaded to the mobile workstation shall be accessible only through
a login/password-protected system capable of documenting all access of information
by name, date, and time.

(c)

Persons approved to access ALPR data under these guidelines are permitted to
access the data for legitimate law enforcement purposes only, such as when the data
relate to a specific criminal investigation or Department related civil or administrative
action.

(d)

Such ALPR data may be released to other authorized and verified law enforcement
officials and agencies for legitimate law enforcement purposes.

(e)

Every ALPR detection browsing inquiry must be documented by either the associated
Vallejo Police case number or incident number, and/or a reason for the inquiry.

For security or data breaches, see the Records Release and Maintenance Policy.

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 5

Page 17 of 56

Page 18 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

426.7 POLICY
The policy of the Vallejo Police Department is to utilize ALPR technology to capture and store
digital license plate data and images while recognizing the established privacy rights of the public.
All data and images gathered by the ALPR are for the official use of this Department. Because
such data may contain confidential information, it is not open to public review.
The Vallejo Police Department does not permit the sharing of ALPR data gathered by the City
or its contractors/subcontractors for purpose of federal immigration enforcement, pursuant to the
California Values Act (Government Code § 7282.5; Government Code § 7284.2 et seq) – these
federal immigration agencies include Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs
and Border Patrol (CPB).
426.8 ALPR DATA DETECTION BROWSING AUDITS
It is the responsibility of the Professional Standards Division (PSD) Lieutenant or the Chief's
designee to ensure that an audit is conducted of ALPR detection browsing inquiries at least once
during each calendar year. The Department will audit a sampling of the ALPR system utilization
from the prior 12-month period to verify proper use in accordance with the above authorized
uses. The audit shall randomly select at least 10 detection browsing inquiries conducted by
Department employees during the preceding six-month period and determine if each inquiry meets
the requirements established in policy section 462.6(e).
The audit shall be documented in the form of an internal Department memorandum to the Chief of
Police. The memorandum shall include any data errors found so that such errors can be corrected.
After review by the Chief of Police, the memorandum and any associated documentation shall be
filed and retained by PSD.
426.9 RELEASING ALPR DATA
The ALPR data may be shared only with public agencies and only as otherwise permitted by law
(Civil Code § 1798.90.55).
For purposes of this section, a public agency is limited to California state or local agencies,
including law enforcement agencies, and does not include out-of-state or federal law enforcement
agencies (Civil Code § 1798.90.5).
The following procedures are guidelines for ALPR requests:
(a)

The agency makes a written request for the ALPR data that includes:
1.

The name of the agency.

The name of the person requesting.

The intended purpose of obtaining the information.

(b)

The request is reviewed by the Administration Division Commander or the authorized
designee and approved before the request is fulfilled.

(c)

The approved request is retained on file.

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 6

Page 18 of 56

Page 19 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

Requests for ALPR data by non-California public agencies will be processed as provided in the
Records Maintenance and Release Policy (Civil Code § 1798.90.55).
426.10 TRAINING
The Training Sergeant should ensure that members receive department-approved training for
those authorized to use or access the ALPR system (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code §
1798.90.53).
No member of this Department shall operate ALPR equipment or access ALPR data without first
completing Department-approved training

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 7

Page 19 of 56

Page 20 of 56

Policy

Vallejo Police Department

434

Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Gun Shot Audio Detection System
434.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the use of Gun Shot Audio Detection
(GSAD) technology. The Department currently uses Flock Safety Technology "Raven" for GSAD.
434.2 POLICY
It shall be the policy of the Department to properly utilize GSAD technology to enhance the
Department's ability to respond to and investigate violent crimes involving illegal gunfire. All raw
data gathered by GSAD are for the official use of this Department. All raw data collected by GSAD
may contain confidential information, it is not open to public review.

434.3 GENERAL PROCEDURES
(a)

GSAD uses audio sensors placed in selected areas to identify the location of gunfire
which will be the equipment's primary function, however, the system also has the ability
to detect firework and sideshow activity.

(b)

GSAD recognizes and records gunfire within a geographical area and relays that
information immediately to the Department's communications center alerts all active
Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) if logged into the GSAD system. Based on the
information from GSAD, a call for service will be entered into the Computer Aided
Dispatch (CAD) system.

(c)

GSAD provides an accessible audio recording of the incident to the MDT (patrol
vehicle) and users logged into the system from a desktop.

(d)

Flock Safety is responsible for the storage of all audio recording and related
information and will retain the information for a period of 30 days.

(e)

The Operations Captain will supervise or designate a project supervisor to oversee
the installation and data collection of the GSAD program. Information generated by
the GSAD system will be tracked by the project supervisor.

(f)

GSAD incident reports and audio recordings shall not be released to the public, media,
or other outside entity without the authorization of the Operations Captain or higher
authority.

(g)

Police personnel shall not provide to the public the location or description of the GSAD
sensors.

434.3.1 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER RESPONSIBILITIES
(a)

GSAD incidents shall be entered as a call for service (10-75R).

(b)

The dispatcher entering the incident will classify the GSAD incident as a Priority 2 call
for service.

Gun Shot Audio Detection System - 1

Page 20 of 56

Page 21 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Gun Shot Audio Detection System

(c)

(d)

The dispatcher entering the call for service shall include a detailed location of the
incident and the information captured by GSAD, which may include:
1.

A single gun shot detection

A multi gun shot detection

Dispatchers receiving additional calls from citizens reporting sounds of shots fired
should supplement the original GSAD incident and include specific information
pertinent to the dispatch of the incident, which may include:
1.

A confirmed shooting victim

A description of any involved subject(s)

A description of any involved vehicles

Information about a discarded weapon or evidence of a shooting

(e)

The radio dispatcher shall ensure any units responding are assigned to the original
GSAD incident.

(f)

The radio dispatcher shall remain attentive to possible related calls for service in the
vicinity of the GSAD incident.

(g)

Pertinent information provided by citizens shall be relayed to responding units

Duplicate calls shall be added to the original GSAD incident

Upon confirmation of an actual shooting, the radio dispatcher shall coordinate the
response of additional units and medical aid if needed.

434.3.2 OFFICER RESPONSIBILITIES
(a)

When a GSAD alert is received, available patrol units in proximity of the incident shall
respond to the location and advise dispatch over the police radio that they are en route.

(b)

Responding officers shall treat the incident as a crime in progress and take a safe and
strategic approach to the incident.

(c)

If equipped with a field-based system (MDT), officers shall review the audio at the
scene to assist in the investigation.

(d)

Responding officers shall complete a neighborhood canvass in the area of the
activation.

434.3.3 DATA COLLECTION AND RETENTION
The Investigations Bureau Captain shall ensure systems and processes are in place for the proper
collection and retention of GSAD data.
All GSAD downloaded data should be stored for no longer than one year, and in accordance with
the established records retention schedule. Thereafter, GSAD data should be purged unless it
has become, or it is reasonable to believe it will become, evidence in a criminal or civil action or is
subject to a discovery request or other lawful action to produce records. In those circumstances
the applicable data should be downloaded from the server and booked into evidence.

Gun Shot Audio Detection System - 2

Page 21 of 56

Page 22 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Gun Shot Audio Detection System

GSAD vendorshall store the data and ensure proper maintenance and security of data stored in
their data towers. GSAD vendor shall purge their data at the end of the 30 days of storage.
Restrictions on use of GSAD data:
(a) Information gathered or collected, and records retained by GSAD vendor or any other
Department GSAD system will not be sold, accessed, or used for any purpose other than legitimate
law enforcement or public safety purposes.
434.3.4 ACCOUNTABILITY AND SAFEGUARDS
All data will be closely safeguarded and protected by both procedural and technological means.
The Vallejo Police Department will observe the following safeguards regarding access to and use
of stored data:
(a)

All non-law enforcement requests for access to stored GSAD data shall be processed
in accordance with applicable law.

(b)

All GSAD data downloaded to a workstation shall be accessible only through a login/
password-protected system capable of documenting all access of information by
name, date, and time.

(c)

Persons approved to access GSAD data under these guidelines are permitted to
access the data for legitimate law enforcement purposes only, such as when the data
relates to a specific criminal investigation or Department related civil or administrative
action.

(d)

Such GSAD data may be released to other authorized and verified law enforcement
officials and agencies for legitimate law enforcement purposes in accordance with
California law.

For security or data breaches, see the Records Release and Maintenance Policy.
434.3.5 TRAINING
The System Administrator shall ensure that members receive department-approved training for
those authorized to use or access the GSAD. No employee of this Department shall access GSAD
data without first completing Department approved training.

Gun Shot Audio Detection System - 3

Page 22 of 56

Page 23 of 56

ACTION ITEM 10.B.

DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:

November 5, 2026
Chair and Members of the Police Oversight & Accountability Commission
Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Chief of Police
CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 436- TECHNOLOGY
USE AUDITS AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, NOT RECOMMENDING THE POLICY TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE

RECOMMENDATION
To Recommend to the Chief of Police, adoption of this policy in whole or in part, or in the alternative, not adopt
this policy.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
New Policy
Vallejo Police Department Policy 436 — Technology Use Audit
This policy establishes a standardized process for auditing surveillance technology used by the Vallejo Police
Department. Audits confirm that surveillance technology is used lawfully, consistent with Department policy,
and with respect for the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties of the community.
The Department will conduct periodic audits of all surveillance technology to confirm that authorized users
access, use, share, retain, and manage surveillance information only for approved law enforcement purposes.
These audits promote accountability, identify improper or unauthorized use, ensure compliance with
Department policy and applicable law, and support transparency through public reporting.
For purposes of this policy, "Surveillance technology" shall mean the systematic observation, for law
enforcement purposes, of places, persons or things by visual, aural, electronic, photographic, or other means.
The following technologies are currently subject to this Technology Use Audit:
(a) Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR)
(b) Gunshot Audio Detection Systems (GSAD)
(c) Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) Cameras
(d) Mobile Security Towers (MST)
(e) Body-Worn Cameras (BWC)
(f) Cellular Site Simulators (CSS)
(g) Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
(h) Any additional surveillance technology approved for Department use by the City Council
All surveillance technology used by the Department is subject to periodic audit under this policy, and the audit
capabilities available for that specific system.
Audits verify that surveillance technology is used only for authorized law enforcement purposes and that
safeguards governing access, use, sharing, retention, privacy, and security are being followed.
Audit methods vary by technology and may include review of user activity logs, search histories, event logs,
access records, deployment logs, flight logs, system-generated reports, or other audit data maintained by the
technology provider.
The Professional Standards Division is responsible for coordinating Department technology use audits, unless
otherwise designated by the Chief of Police.
Page 23 of 56

Page 24 of 56

Date: November 5, 2026
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 436- TECHNOLOGY

USE AUDITS AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, NOT RECOMMENDING THE POLICY TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE
Page 2

The Professional Standards Division ensures that surveillance technology audits are conducted at least
quarterly, unless otherwise specified by Department policy or applicable law.
Audit methods depend on the capabilities of each surveillance technology and may include random sampling,
review of available audit records, supervisor performance reviews, deployment log reviews, or examination of
automated audit reports.
Additional audits may be conducted whenever there is reason to believe surveillance technology has been
improperly accessed, used, disclosed, or managed.
A technology use audit may also be initiated following:
(a) A citizen complaint.
(b) An allegation of misuse.
(c) A reported privacy concern.
(d) A suspected policy violation.
(e) A request by the Chief of Police.
(f) A request from the Surveillance Advisory Board.
Corrective action for deficiencies or policy violations identified during a technology use audit shall be based on
the severity of the deficiency or violation and in accordance with the Personnel Complaints Policy.
The Department prepares audit reports documenting the results of surveillance technology use audits.
Public reports summarize the audit period, technology reviewed, methodology, findings, and corrective actions
taken, while protecting confidential, privileged, or legally protected information.
Audit reports are maintained in accordance with Department records retention requirements and made
available consistent with applicable law and Department policy.
FISCAL IMPACT

ATTACHMENTS
1.
POAC Reso Policy 436 CAO Stamp
2.
436- Technology Use Audits

CONTACT
Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Chief VPD
[email protected]

Page 24 of 56

Page 25 of 56

Approved as to form:
By:

for
Veronica Nebb, City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE POLICE OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
COMMISSION (POAC) OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO, MAKING A
RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING VPD POLICY 436 - TECHNOLOGY USE
AUDIT
WHEREAS, the Police Oversight and Accountability ordinance at Vallejo Municipal Code
section 18.03.050O authorizes the Police Oversight and Accountability Commission (POAC) “to
review, advise and provide recommendations regarding any new Police policy or concerning
any modification or revision of any such policy and to independently propose new policies in
their discretion;” and
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police desires to implement Policy 436 “Technology Use Audit.”
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy presented to the Commission,
and attached hereto as Exhibit A, be implemented by the Chief of Police without
changes.
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy presented to the Commission
attached hereto as Exhibit A, be modified before implementation as follows:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A not
be implemented.

Page 25 of 56

Page 26 of 56

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Police Oversight and Accountability Commission of the City of
Vallejo at a special meeting thereof held on November 5, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:
.
NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 26 of 56

Page 27 of 56

Policy
436

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Technology Use Audits
436.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This policy establishes a standardized process for auditing surveillance technology used by the
Vallejo Police Department. Audits confirm that surveillance technology is used lawfully,
consistent with Department policy, and with respect for the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties
of the community.
The Department will conduct periodic audits of all surveillance technology to confirm that
authorized users access, use, share, retain, and manage surveillance information only for
approved law enforcement purposes. These audits promote accountability, identify improper or
unauthorized use, ensure compliance with Department policy and applicable law, and support
transparency.
436.2 SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this policy, "Surveillance technology" shall mean the systematic observation,
for law enforcement purposes, of places, persons or things by visual, aural, electronic,
photographic, or other means.
The following technologies are currently subject to this Technology Use Audit:
(a) Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR)
(b) Gunshot Audio Detection Systems (GSAD)
(c) Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) Cameras
(d) Mobile Security Towers (MST)
(e) Body-Worn Cameras (BWC)
(f)

Cellular Site Simulators (CSS)

(g) Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
(h) Any additional surveillance technology approved for Department use by the City
Council.
436.3 TECHNOLOGY SUBJECT TO AUDIT
All surveillance technology used by the Department is subject to periodic audit under this policy,
and the audit capabilities available for that specific system.
Audits verify that surveillance technology is used only for authorized law enforcement purposes
and that safeguards governing access, use, sharing, retention, privacy, and security are being
followed.
Audit methods vary by technology and may include review of user activity logs, search histories,
event logs, access records, deployment logs, flight logs, system-generated reports, or other
audit data maintained by the technology provider.

Technology Use Audits - 1

Page 27 of 56

Page 28 of 56

The Professional Standards Division is responsible for coordinating Department technology use
audits, unless otherwise designated by the Chief of Police.
436.4 AUDIT PLAN
The Department shall maintain a single, consolidated Audit Plan addressing surveillance
technology use audits. When a new surveillance technology is approved for operational use, the
Audit Plan shall be updated to address that technology. Because the full audit and reporting
capabilities of a given technology may not be fully known until after the technology has been
placed into operational use, this update shall occur as soon as practicable following
deployment, taking into account the technology’s audit and reporting capabilities as identified
through operational use, testing, or vendor documentation.
At a minimum, the Audit Plan shall address the following for each surveillance technology it
covers:
(a) Records Reviewed – the specific logs, records, or system data to be examined, as
identified in the Audit Plan’s Control Matrix (Data Point / Audit Item).
(b) Audit Methodology – the method(s) used to conduct the audit, including written
justification for the methodology selected, as set forth in the Audit Plan’s Control
Matrix and Procedures. Where trend analysis, anomaly detection, or other data
analytics tools are reasonably available and operationally feasible for a given
technology, audits should incorporate them in addition to random sampling and other
methods.
(c) Data Analytics – where reasonably available and operationally feasible, the use of
analytics or reporting tools to help identify unusual, suspicious, or non-compliant
access or use patterns, as described in Section 7 (Evidence Collection Methods) of
the Audit Plan.
(d) Misuse Detection – the criteria used to identify potential misuse, unauthorized
access, or noncompliance with Department policy, as set forth in the Audit Plan’s
Control Matrix (Pass Criteria).
(e) Documentation – how audit findings, methodology, and results will be recorded and
retained, as set forth in Section 10 (Reporting Requirements) of the Audit Plan.
(f)

Corrective Action – the process for referring identified deficiencies or violations for
corrective action, as set forth in Section 9 (Findings, Escalation & Corrective Action)
of the Audit Plan.

436.5 AUDIT FREQUENCY
The Professional Standards Division ensures that surveillance technology audits are conducted
at least quarterly, unless otherwise specified by Department policy or applicable law. Each
quarterly audit shall incorporate a random sample of at least 30 records drawn from the
preceding three months of the quarter.
Audit methods depend on the capabilities of each surveillance technology and may include
random sampling, review of available audit records, supervisor performance reviews,
deployment log reviews, or examination of automated audit reports.
Additional audits or investigations should be conducted whenever there is reason to believe
surveillance technology has been improperly accessed, used, disclosed, or managed.

Technology Use Audits - 2

Page 28 of 56

Page 29 of 56

A technology use investigation should also be initiated following:
(a) A citizen complaint.
(b) An allegation of misuse.
(c) A reported privacy concern.
(d) A suspected policy violation.
(e) At the direction of the Chief of Police.
(f)

A request from the Surveillance Advisory Board.

436.6 CORRECTIVE ACTION
Corrective action for deficiencies or policy violations identified during a technology use audit
shall be documented and dispositioned in accordance with the Personnel Complaints Policy.
436.7 PUBLIC REPORT
The Department prepares audit reports documenting the results of surveillance technology use
audits.
Public reports summarize the audit period, technology reviewed, methodology, findings, and
corrective actions taken, while protecting confidential, privileged, or legally protected
information.
Audit reports are maintained in accordance with Department records retention requirements.
Where feasible given technology sensitivity, staffing, and legal constraints, public reports shall
be posted on a publicly accessible Department website in a manner consistent with applicable
law and Department policy, providing sufficient detail to inform the public of the scope, findings,
corrective actions, and status of any unresolved issues.
436.8 AUDIT PLAN REVIEW
The Audit Plan shall be reviewed and updated by the Professional Standards Division
Commander, annually, or as needed such as when a new surveillance technology is approved
for operational use or when a material development in an existing technology's capabilities,
Department policy, or applicable law affects the Department's ability to audit that technology.

Technology Use Audits - 3

Page 29 of 56

Page 30 of 56

ACTION ITEM 10.C.

DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:

November 5, 2026
Chair and Members of the Police Oversight & Accountability Commission
Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Police Chief
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY 310- CANINES, ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED
CHANGES TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT
RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE POLICY

RECOMMENDATION
To recommend proposed changes to the Chief of Police or in the alternative, not recommend changes.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Vallejo Police Department Policy 310- Canines
This policy establishes guidelines for the use of canines to augment police services in the community,
including but not limited to locating individuals and contraband and apprehending criminal offenders.
The current policy is expansive as to the canine handler assignment. Best practices are included as well as
state required mandates determined by CA POST. The roles and responsibilities of the canine coordinator,
request for use, apprehension guidelines, preparation for deployment, emergency medical care for canine
injury or illness, reporting bites, deployments, and injuries, non-apprehension guidelines, continued training,
failure to meet standards, bomb detection, handler responsibilities, procedures for controlled substances used
for training, and handler compensation
Proposed changes to the policy include a renumbering of sections and the addition of "i" to 310.2
FISCAL IMPACT

ATTACHMENTS
1.
POAC Reso Policy 310 CAO Stamp
2.
Canines Policy 310 DRAFT Red Line 102226
3.
Canines (Existing)

CONTACT
Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Chief VPD
[email protected]

Page 30 of 56

Page 31 of 56

Approved as to form:
By:

for
Veronica Nebb, City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE POLICE OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
COMMISSION (POAC) OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO MAKING A
RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING REVISED VPD POLICY 310- CANINES
WHEREAS, the Police Oversight and Accountability ordinance at Vallejo Municipal Code
section 18.03.050O authorizes the Police Oversight and Accountability Commission (POAC) “to
review, advise and provide recommendations regarding any new Police policy or concerning
any modification or revision of any such policy and to independently propose new policies in
their discretion;” and
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police desires to revise and implement Policy 310 “Canines.”
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy presented to the Commission,
and attached hereto as Exhibit A, be revised and implemented by the Chief of Police
without changes.
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy presented to the Commission
attached hereto as Exhibit A, be modified before implementation as follows:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A not
be implemented.

Page 31 of 56

Page 32 of 56

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Police Oversight and Accountability Commission of the City of
Vallejo at a special meeting thereof held on November 5, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:
.
NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 32 of 56

Page 33 of 56

VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT
CANINES — POLICY 310

REDLINE COMPARISON — CURRENT POLICY vs. DRAFT (10/22/2026)

Blue = proposed new language / additions | Red strikethrough = language proposed for removal
310.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Best Practice
This policy establishes guidelines for the use of canines to augment police services in the community, including but not
limited to locating individuals and contraband and apprehending criminal offenders.
310.1.1 ASSIGNMENT
Best Practice MODIFIED
Canine teams should be assigned to assist and supplement the Operations Bureau to function primarily in assist or
cover assignments. However, they may be assigned by the Watch Commander to other functions, such as routine calls
for service, based on the current operational needs.
Canine teams should generally not be assigned to handle routine matters that will take them out of service for extended
periods of time and then only with the approval of the Watch Commander.
310.2 CANINE COORDINATOR
Best Practice
The canine coordinator shall be appointed by and directly responsible to the Operations Bureau or the authorized
designee.
The responsibilities of the coordinator include but are not limited to:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)

Reviewing all canine use reports to ensure compliance with policy and to identify training issues and other
needs of the program.
Maintaining a liaison with the vendor kennel.
Maintaining a liaison with command staff and functional supervisors.
Maintaining a liaison with other agency canine coordinators.
Maintaining accurate records to document canine activities.
Recommending and overseeing the procurement of equipment and services for the teams of handlers and
canines.
Scheduling all canine-related activities.
Ensuring the canine teams are scheduled for regular training to maximize their capabilities.
Periodically reviewing this policy and recommending updates to the Operations Bureau or the authorized
designee as needed.

310.3 REQUESTS FOR CANINE TEAMS
Best Practice MODIFIED
Operations Bureau members are encouraged to request the use of a canine. Requests for a canine team from
department units outside of the Operations Bureau shall be reviewed by the Watch Commander.
310.4 APPREHENSION GUIDELINES
Best Practice
A canine may be used to locate and apprehend a suspect if the canine handler reasonably believes that the individual
has committed, is committing, or is threatening to commit any serious offense and if any of the following conditions
exist:
a)

There is a reasonable belief the suspect poses an imminent threat of violence or serious harm to the public,
any officer, or the handler.

Page 33 of 56

Page 34 of 56

b)
c)

The suspect is physically resisting or threatening to resist arrest and the use of a canine reasonably appears
to be necessary to overcome such resistance.
The suspect is believed to be concealed in an area where entry by other than the canine would pose a threat
to the safety of officers or the public.

It is recognized that situations may arise that do not fall within the provisions set forth in this policy. Such events require
consideration of the totality of the circumstances and the use of an objective reasonableness standard applied to the
decision to use a canine.
Absent a reasonable belief that a suspect has committed, is committing, or is threatening to commit a serious offense,
mere flight from a pursuing officer, without any of the above conditions, shall not serve as the basis for the use of a
canine to apprehend a suspect.
Use of a canine to locate and apprehend a suspect wanted for a lesser criminal offense than those identified above
requires approval from the Watch Commander. Absent a change in circumstances that presents an imminent threat to
officers, the canine or the public, such canine use should be conducted on-leash or under conditions that minimize the
likelihood the canine will bite or otherwise injure the individual.
In all applications, once the suspect has been located and no longer reasonably appears to present a threat or risk of
escape, the handler should secure the canine as soon as it becomes reasonably practicable.
If the canine has apprehended the suspect with a secure bite, and the handler believes that the suspect no longer
poses a threat, the handler should promptly command the canine to release the suspect.
310.4.1 PREPARATION FOR DEPLOYMENT
Best Practice
Prior to the use of a canine to search for or apprehend any suspect, the canine handler and/or the supervisor on-scene
should carefully consider all pertinent information reasonably available at the time. The information should include but
is not limited to:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)

The nature and seriousness of the suspected offense.
Whether violence or weapons were used or are anticipated.
The degree of resistance or threatened resistance, if any, the suspect has shown.
The suspect’s known or perceived age.
The potential for injury to officers or the public caused by the suspect if the canine is not utilized.
Any potential danger to the public and/or other officers at the scene if the canine is released.
The potential for the suspect to escape or flee if the canine is not utilized.

Page 34 of 56

Page 35 of 56

Best Practice MODIFIED
Whenever a canine deployment results in a bite or causes injury to an intended suspect, a supervisor should be
promptly notified and the injuries documented. The injured person shall be promptly treated by emergency medical
services personnel and, if appropriate, transported to an appropriate medical facility for further treatment. The
deployment and injuries should also be included in any related incident or arrest report.
Any unintended bite or injury caused by a canine, whether on- or off-duty, shall be promptly reported to the canine
coordinator. Unintended bites or injuries caused by a canine should be documented in an administrative report, not in
a canine use report.
If an individual alleges an injury, either visible or not visible, a supervisor shall be notified and both the individual’s
injured and uninjured areas shall be photographed as soon as practicable after first tending to the immediate needs of
the injured party. Photographs shall be retained as evidence in accordance with current department evidence
procedures. The photographs shall be retained until the criminal proceeding is completed and the time for any related
civil proceeding has expired.
Canines used by law enforcement agencies are generally exempt from impoundment and reporting requirements.
However, the canine shall be made available for examination at any reasonable time if requested by the local health
department. The canine handler shall also notify the local health department if the canine exhibits any abnormal
behavior after a bite (Health and Safety Code § 121685).
310.65 NON-APPREHENSION GUIDELINES
Best Practice
Properly trained canines may be used to track or search for non-criminals (e.g., lost children, individuals who may be
disoriented or in need of medical attention). The canine handler is responsible for determining the canine’s suitability
for such assignments based on the conditions and the particular abilities of the canine. When the canine is deployed
in a search or other non- apprehension operation, the following guidelines apply:
a)
b)
c)
d)

Absent a change in circumstances that presents an imminent threat to officers, the canine, or the public, such
applications should be conducted on-leash or under conditions that minimize the likelihood the canine will bite
or otherwise injure the individual, if located.
Unless otherwise directed by a supervisor, assisting members should take direction from the handler in order
to minimize interference with the canine.
Throughout the deployment, the handler should periodically give verbal assurances that the canine will not
bite or hurt the individual and encourage the individual to make him/herself known.
Once the individual has been located, the handler should place the canine in a down- stay or otherwise secure
it as soon as reasonably practicable.

310.56.1 CONTINUED TRAINING
State MODIFIED
Each canine team shall thereafter be re-certified to current POST guidelines on an annual basis. Additional training
considerations are as follows:
a) Canine teams shall receive training as defined in the current contract with the department's canine training
provider.
b) Canine handlers are encouraged to engage in additional training with approval of the Unit Coordinator.
c) To ensure that all training is consistent, no handler, trainer, or outside vendor is authorized to train to a
standard that is contrary to the policies of the Vallejo Police Department.
d) All canine training shall be conducted while on-duty unless otherwise approved by the Unit Coordinator or
Watch Commander.
310.56.2 FAILURE TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE POST TRAINING
State MODIFIED
Any dog team failing POST canine certification standards shall not be deployed in the field until certification is achieved.
Pending successful certification, the canine handler shall be temporarily reassigned to regular patrol duties.
310.56.3 BOMB/EXPLOSIVE DETECTION
Best Practice

Page 35 of 56

Page 36 of 56

Because of the high risk of danger to the public and officers when a bomb or other explosive device is suspected, the
use of a canine team trained in explosive detection may be considered. When available, an explosive-detection canine
team may be used in accordance with current law and under certain circumstances, including:
a)
b)
c)
d)

Assisting in the search of a building, structure, area, vehicle, or article where an actual or suspected explosive
device has been reported or located.
Assisting with searches at transportation facilities and vehicles (e.g., buses, airplanes, trains).
Preventive searches at special events, VIP visits, official buildings, and other restricted areas. Searches of
individuals should remain minimally intrusive and shall be strictly limited to the purpose of detecting explosives.
Assisting in the search of scenes where an explosion has occurred and an explosive device or secondary
explosive device is suspected.

At no time will an explosive-detection trained canine be used to render a suspected device safe or clear.
310.6 HANDLER RESPONSIBILITIES
Best Practice MODIFIED
The canine handler shall ultimately be responsible for the health and welfare of the canine and shall ensure that the
canine receives proper nutrition, grooming, training, medical care, affection and living conditions. The canine handler
will be responsible for the following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)

Except as required during appropriate deployment, the handler shall not expose the canine to any foreseeable
and unreasonable risk of harm.
The handler shall maintain all department equipment under theirhis/her control in a clean and serviceable
condition.
Handlers shall permit the canine coordinator to conduct spontaneous on-site inspections of affected areas of
their homes as well as their canine vehicles to verify that conditions and equipment conform to this policy.
Any changes in the living status of the handler that may affect the lodging or environment of the canine shall
be reported to the canine coordinator as soon as possible.
When off-duty, the canine shall be in a kennel provided by the City at the home of the handler. When a canine
is kenneled at the handler’s home, the gate shall be secured with a lock. When off-duty, the canine may be
let out of the kennel while under the direct control of the handler.
Under no circumstances will the canine be lodged at another location unless approved by the canine
coordinator or Watch Commander.
When off-duty, the handler shall not involve the canine in any law enforcement activity or official conduct
unless approved in advance by the canine coordinator or Watch Commander.
Whenever a canine handler is off-duty for an extended number of days, it may be necessary to temporarily
relocate the canine. In those situations, the handler shall give reasonable notice to the canine coordinator so
that appropriate arrangements can be made.

310.6.1 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PROCEDURES
Best Practice MODIFIED
Due to the responsibilities and liabilities involved with possessing readily usable amounts of controlled substances and
the ever-present danger of accidental ingestion of these controlled substances by the canine, the following procedure
shall be strictly followed:
a) All necessary controlled substance training samples shall be acquired from the Vallejo Police Department's
evidence personnel or from allied agencies authorized by Health & Safety Code § 11367.5 to provide
controlled substance training samples. All controlled substance training samples shall be weighed and tested
prior to dispensing to the individual canine handler
b) The weight and test results shall be recorded and maintained by this department;
c) Any person receiving controlled substance training samples pursuant to Health & Safety Code § 11367.5 shall
maintain custody and control of the controlled substances and shall keep records regarding any loss of, or
damage to, those controlled substances
d) All controlled substance training samples will be inspected, weighed, and tested bi- annually. The results of
the testing shall be recorded and maintained by the canine coordinator with a copy forwarded to the dispensing
agency
e) All controlled substance training samples will be stored in locked metal boxes at all times, except during
training. The locked metal boxes shall be secured in the trunk of the canine handler's assigned patrol unit, or
stored in a locked evidence locker.
f) The Canine Unit Coordinator shall periodically inspect every controlled substance training sample for damage
or tampering and take any appropriate action;

Page 36 of 56

Page 37 of 56

g)
h)

Any unusable controlled substance training samples shall be returned to the Evidence/Property Unit or to the
dispensing agency
All controlled substance training samples shall be returned to the dispensing agency upon the conclusion of
the training or upon demand by the dispensing agency.

310.7 HANDLER COMPENSATION
Federal
The canine handler shall be available for call-out under conditions specified by the canine coordinator.
The canine handler shall be compensated for time spent in the care, feeding, grooming, and other needs of the canine
in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and according to the terms of the collective bargaining
agreement (29 USC § 207).

Page 37 of 56

Page 38 of 56

Policy

Vallejo Police Department

310

Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Canines
310.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This policy establishes guidelines for the use of canines to augment police services in the
community, including but not limited to locating individuals and contraband and apprehending
criminal offenders.
310.1 ASSIGNMENT
Canine teams should be assigned to assist and supplement the Operations Bureau to function
primarily in assist or cover assignments. However, they may be assigned by the Watch
Commander to other functions, such as routine calls for service, based on the current operational
needs.
Canine teams should generally not be assigned to handle routine matters that will take them out
of service for extended periods of time and then only with the approval of the Watch Commander.
310.2 CANINE COORDINATOR
The canine coordinator shall be appointed by and directly responsible to the Operations Bureau or
the authorized designee.
The responsibilities of the coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a)

Reviewing all canine use reports to ensure compliance with policy and to identify
training issues and other needs of the program.

(b)

Maintaining a liaison with the vendor kennel.

(c)

Maintaining a liaison with command staff and functional supervisors.

(d)

Maintaining a liaison with other agency canine coordinators.

(e)

Maintaining accurate records to document canine activities.

(f)

Recommending and overseeing the procurement of equipment and services for the
teams of handlers and canines.

(g)

Scheduling all canine-related activities.

(h)

Ensuring the canine teams are scheduled for regular training to maximize their
capabilities.

310.3 REQUESTS FOR CANINE TEAMS
Operations Bureau members are encouraged to request the use of a canine. Requests for a
canine team from department units outside of the Operations Bureau shall be reviewed by the
Watch Commander.

Canines - 1

Page 38 of 56

Page 39 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Canines

310.4 APPREHENSION GUIDELINES
A canine may be used to locate and apprehend a suspect if the canine handler reasonably believes
that the individual has committed, is committing, or is threatening to commit any serious offense
and if any of the following conditions exist:
(a)

There is a reasonable belief the suspect poses an imminent threat of violence or
serious harm to the public, any officer, or the handler.

(b)

The suspect is physically resisting or threatening to resist arrest and the use of a
canine reasonably appears to be necessary to overcome such resistance.

(c)

The suspect is believed to be concealed in an area where entry by other than the
canine would pose a threat to the safety of officers or the public.

It is recognized that situations may arise that do not fall within the provisions set forth in this policy.
Such events require consideration of the totality of the circumstances and the use of an objective
reasonableness standard applied to the decision to use a canine.
Absent a reasonable belief that a suspect has committed, is committing, or is threatening to commit
a serious offense, mere flight from a pursuing officer, without any of the above conditions, shall
not serve as the basis for the use of a canine to apprehend a suspect.
Use of a canine to locate and apprehend a suspect wanted for a lesser criminal offense than those
identified above requires approval from the Watch Commander. Absent a change in circumstances
that presents an imminent threat to officers, the canine or the public, such canine use should
be conducted on-leash or under conditions that minimize the likelihood the canine will bite or
otherwise injure the individual.
In all applications, once the suspect has been located and no longer reasonably appears to present
a threat or risk of escape, the handler should secure the canine as soon as it becomes reasonably
practicable.
If the canine has apprehended the suspect with a secure bite, and the handler believes that the
suspect no longer poses a threat, the handler should promptly command the canine to release
the suspect.
310.4.1 PREPARATION FOR DEPLOYMENT
Prior to the use of a canine to search for or apprehend any suspect, the canine handler and/or
the supervisor on-scene should carefully consider all pertinent information reasonably available
at the time. The information should include but is not limited to:
(a)

The nature and seriousness of the suspected offense.

(b)

Whether violence or weapons were used or are anticipated.

(c)

The degree of resistance or threatened resistance, if any, the suspect has shown.

(d)

The suspect’s known or perceived age.

(e)

The potential for injury to officers or the public caused by the suspect if the canine
is not utilized.

Canines - 2

Page 39 of 56

Page 40 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Canines

(f)

Any potential danger to the public and/or other officers at the scene if the canine is
released.

(g)

The potential for the suspect to escape or flee if the canine is not utilized.

As circumstances permit, the canine handler should make every reasonable effort to communicate
and coordinate with other involved members to minimize the risk of unintended injury.
It is the canine handler’s responsibility to evaluate each situation and determine whether the use
of a canine is appropriate and reasonable. The canine handler shall have the authority to decline
the use of the canine whenever he/she deems deployment is unsuitable.
A supervisor who is sufficiently apprised of the situation may prohibit deploying the canine.
Unless otherwise directed by a supervisor, assisting members should take direction from the
handler in order to minimize interference with the canine.
310.4.2 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE
The handler shall notify the Unit Coordinator as soon as practicable when emergency medical
care for the canine is required.
Depending on the severity of the injury or illness, the canine shall either be treated by the
designated veterinarian or transported to a designated emergency medical facility for treatment.
If the handler and dog are out of the area, the handler may use the nearest available veterinarian.
310.4.3 REPORTING DEPLOYMENTS, BITES AND INJURIES
Whenever a canine deployment results in a bite or causes injury to an intended suspect, a
supervisor should be promptly notified and the injuries documented. The injured person shall be
promptly treated by emergency medical services personnel and, if appropriate, transported to
an appropriate medical facility for further treatment. The deployment and injuries should also be
included in any related incident or arrest report.
Any unintended bite or injury caused by a canine, whether on- or off-duty, shall be promptly
reported to the canine coordinator. Unintended bites or injuries caused by a canine should be
documented in an administrative report, not in a canine use report.
If an individual alleges an injury, either visible or not visible, a supervisor shall be notified and both
the individual’s injured and uninjured areas shall be photographed as soon as practicable after first
tending to the immediate needs of the injured party. Photographs shall be retained as evidence in
accordance with current department evidence procedures. The photographs shall be retained until
the criminal proceeding is completed and the time for any related civil proceeding has expired.
Canines used by law enforcement agencies are generally exempt from impoundment and
reporting requirements. However, the canine shall be made available for examination at any
reasonable time if requested by the local health department. The canine handler shall also notify
the local health department if the canine exhibits any abnormal behavior after a bite (Health and
Safety Code § 121685).

Canines - 3

Page 40 of 56

Page 41 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Canines

310.6 NON-APPREHENSION GUIDELINES
Properly trained canines may be used to track or search for non-criminals (e.g., lost children,
individuals who may be disoriented or in need of medical attention). The canine handler is
responsible for determining the canine’s suitability for such assignments based on the conditions
and the particular abilities of the canine. When the canine is deployed in a search or other nonapprehension operation, the following guidelines apply:
(a)

(b)

Unless otherwise directed by a supervisor, assisting members should take direction
from the handler in order to minimize interference with the canine.

(c)

Throughout the deployment, the handler should periodically give verbal assurances
that the canine will not bite or hurt the individual and encourage the individual to make
him/herself known.

(d)

Once the individual has been located, the handler should place the canine in a downstay or otherwise secure it as soon as reasonably practicable.

310.6.1 CONTINUED TRAINING
Each canine team shall thereafter be re-certified to current POST guidelines on an annual basis.
Additional training considerations are as follows:
(a)

Canine teams shall receive training as defined in the current contract with the
department's canine training provider.

(b)

Canine handlers are encouraged to engage in additional training with approval of the
Unit Coordinator.

(c)

To ensure that all training is consistent, no handler, trainer, or outside vendor is
authorized to train to a standard that is contrary to the policies of the Vallejo Police
Department.

(d)

All canine training shall be conducted while on-duty unless otherwise approved by the
Unit Coordinator or Watch Commander.

310.6.2 FAILURE TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE POST TRAINING
Any dog team failing POST canine certification standards shall not be deployed in the field until
certification is achieved. Pending successful certification, the canine handler shall be temporarily
reassigned to regular patrol duties.
310.6.3 BOMB/EXPLOSIVE DETECTION
Because of the high risk of danger to the public and officers when a bomb or other explosive
device is suspected, the use of a canine team trained in explosive detection may be considered.
When available, an explosive-detection canine team may be used in accordance with current law
and under certain circumstances, including:

Canines - 4

Page 41 of 56

Page 42 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Canines

(a)

Assisting in the search of a building, structure, area, vehicle, or article where an actual
or suspected explosive device has been reported or located.

(b)

Assisting with searches at transportation facilities and vehicles (e.g., buses, airplanes,
trains).

(c)

Preventive searches at special events, VIP visits, official buildings, and other restricted
areas. Searches of individuals should remain minimally intrusive and shall be strictly
limited to the purpose of detecting explosives.

(d)

Assisting in the search of scenes where an explosion has occurred and an explosive
device or secondary explosive device is suspected.

At no time will an explosive-detection trained canine be used to render a suspected device safe
or clear.
310.6 HANDLER RESPONSIBILITIES
The canine handler shall ultimately be responsible for the health and welfare of the canine and
shall ensure that the canine receives proper nutrition, grooming, training, medical care, affection
and living conditions.
The canine handler will be responsible for the following:
(a)

Except as required during appropriate deployment, the handler shall not expose the
canine to any foreseeable and unreasonable risk of harm.

(b)

The handler shall maintain all department equipment under his/her control in a clean
and serviceable condition.

(c)

Handlers shall permit the canine coordinator to conduct spontaneous on-site
inspections of affected areas of their homes as well as their canine vehicles to verify
that conditions and equipment conform to this policy.

(d)

Any changes in the living status of the handler that may affect the lodging or
environment of the canine shall be reported to the canine coordinator as soon as
possible.

(e)

When off-duty, the canine shall be in a kennel provided by the City at the home of the
handler. When a canine is kenneled at the handler’s home, the gate shall be secured
with a lock. When off-duty, the canine may be let out of the kennel while under the
direct control of the handler.

(f)

Under no circumstances will the canine be lodged at another location unless approved
by the canine coordinator or Watch Commander.

(g)

When off-duty, the handler shall not involve the canine in any law enforcement activity
or official conduct unless approved in advance by the canine coordinator or Watch
Commander.

(h)

Whenever a canine handler is off-duty for an extended number of days, it may be
necessary to temporarily relocate the canine. In those situations, the handler shall
give reasonable notice to the canine coordinator so that appropriate arrangements
can be made.

Canines - 5

Page 42 of 56

Page 43 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Canines

310.6.1 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PROCEDURES
Due to the responsibilities and liabilities involved with possessing readily usable amounts of
controlled substances and the ever-present danger of accidental ingestion of these controlled
substances by the canine, the following procedure shall be strictly followed:
(a)

All necessary controlled substance training samples shall be acquired from the Vallejo
Police Department's evidence personnel or from allied agencies authorized by Health
& Safety Code § 11367.5 to provide controlled substance training samples. All
controlled substance training samples shall be weighed and tested prior to dispensing
to the individual canine handler

(b)

The weight and test results shall be recorded and maintained by this department;

(c)

Any person receiving controlled substance training samples pursuant to Health &
Safety Code § 11367.5 shall maintain custody and control of the controlled substances
and shall keep records regarding any loss of, or damage to, those controlled
substances

(d)

All controlled substance training samples will be inspected, weighed, and tested biannually. The results of the testing shall be recorded and maintained by the canine
coordinator with a copy forwarded to the dispensing agency

(e)

All controlled substance training samples will be stored in locked metal boxes at all
times, except during training. The locked metal boxes shall be secured in the trunk of
the canine handler's assigned patrol unit, or stored in a locked evidence locker.

(f)

The Canine Unit Coordinator shall periodically inspect every controlled substance
training sample for damage or tampering and take any appropriate action;

(g)

Any unusable controlled substance training samples shall be returned to the Evidence/
Property Unit or to the dispensing agency

(h)

All controlled substance training samples shall be returned to the dispensing agency
upon the conclusion of the training or upon demand by the dispensing agency.

310.7 HANDLER COMPENSATION
The canine handler shall be available for call-out under conditions specified by the canine
coordinator.
The canine handler shall be compensated for time spent in the care, feeding, grooming, and other
needs of the canine in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and according to
the terms of the collective bargaining agreement (29 USC § 207).

Canines - 6

Page 43 of 56

Page 44 of 56

ACTION ITEM 10.D.

DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:

November 5, 2026
Chair and Members of the Police Oversight & Accountability Commission
Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Police Chief
CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 207- TRAINING
POLICY, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES
TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT RECOMMENDING THE
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE POLICY

RECOMMENDATION
Provide a recommendation or in the alternative, not recommend changes to the Chief of Police for Policy 207
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Vallejo Police Department Policy 207- Training Policy

It is the policy of this department to administer a training program that will provide for the professional growth and
continued development of its personnel. By doing so, the Department will ensure its personnel possess the
knowledge and skills necessary to provide a professional level of service that meets the needs of the community.
The Department seeks to provide ongoing training and encourages all personnel to participate in advanced training
and formal education on a continual basis. Training is provided within the confines of funding, requirements of a
given assignment, staffing levels, and legal mandates. Whenever possible, the Department will use courses certified
by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST).
Recommended Updates include best practices, state law mandates, modifications to existing language,
renumbering sections, discretionary changes, and agency specific content. These include:

• Policy intention moved from 207.9 to 207.1
• CA POST mandates per PC 13510 and 11 CCR 1005
• Non sworn Orientation (as part of new hire training)
• CAPS Accreditation training which at a minimum must conform to POST standards
• A Plan for Leadership Development
• Expanded language of role and purpose of the Training Committee

FISCAL IMPACT

ATTACHMENTS
1.
POAC Reso Policy 207 CAO Stamp
2.
Training Policy 207 DRAFT Red Line 102226
3.
Training_Policy (Existing)

Page 44 of 56

Page 45 of 56

Date: November 5, 2026
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 207- TRAINING

POLICY, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED
CHANGES TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT
RECOMMENDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE POLICY
Page 2

CONTACT
Sanjay Ramrakha, Deputy Chief VPD
[email protected]

Page 45 of 56

Page 46 of 56

Approved as to form:
By:

for
Veronica Nebb, City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE POLICE OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
COMMISSION (POAC) OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO MAKING A
RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING REVISED VPD POLICY 207- TRAINING
POLICY
WHEREAS, the Police Oversight and Accountability ordinance at Vallejo Municipal Code
section 18.03.050O authorizes the Police Oversight and Accountability Commission (POAC) “to
review, advise and provide recommendations regarding any new Police policy or concerning
any modification or revision of any such policy and to independently propose new policies in
their discretion;” and
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police desires to revise and implement Policy 207 “Training
Policy.”
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy presented to the Commission,
and attached hereto as Exhibit A, be revised and implemented by the Chief of Police
without changes.
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy presented to the Commission
attached hereto as Exhibit A, be modified before implementation as follows:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
The POAC hereby recommends that the revised policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A not
be implemented.

Page 46 of 56

Page 47 of 56

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Police Oversight and Accountability Commission of the City of
Vallejo at a special meeting thereof held on November 5, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:
.
NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 47 of 56

Page 48 of 56

VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAINING POLICY 207

REDLINE COMPARISON — CURRENT POLICY vs. DRAFT (10/22/2026)

Blue text = proposed new or moved language | Red strikethrough = language proposed for removal
207.1 POLICY
Best Practice
The Department shall administer a training program that will meet the standards of federal, state, local, and
POST training requirements. It is a priority of this department to provide continuing education and training for
the professional growth and development of its members.
207.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Best Practice
It is the policy of this department to administer a training program that will provide for the professional growth
and continued development of its personnel. By doing so, the Department will ensure its personnel possess
the knowledge and skills necessary to provide a professional level of service that meets the needs of the
community.
207.2 207.3 PHILOSOPHY
Best Practice MODIFIED
The Department seeks to provide ongoing training and encourages all personnel to participate in advanced
training and formal education on a continual basis. Training is provided within the confines of funding,
requirements of a given assignment, staffing levels, and legal mandates. Whenever possible, the Department
will use courses certified by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST).
See attachment: Training Request 06052014.pdf
207.3 207.4 OBJECTIVES
Discretionary
The objectives of the Training Program are to:
a)
b)
c)
d)

Enhance the level of law enforcement service to the public.
Increase the technical expertise and overall effectiveness of our personnel.
Provide for continued professional development of department personnel.
Ensure compliance with POST rules and regulations concerning law enforcement training.

207.4 207.5 TRAINING PLAN
Discretionary MODIFIED
A training plan will be developed and maintained by the Training Sergeant.
207.5 TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Discretionary
207.5.1 POST-MANDATED TRAINING
State
Members of the Department shall complete all POST-mandated training, including (Penal Code § 13510; 11
CCR § 1005):
a)
b)

Entry-level training standards, prior to being assigned duties that include the exercise of peace officer
power.
At least 24 hours of POST-certified and/or POST-approved training every two years.

207.5.2 NON-SWORN ORIENTATION
Best Practice

Page 48 of 56

Page 49 of 56

The Training Sergeant or the authorized designee shall provide all newly appointed non-sworn members with
information and instruction regarding the following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)

Department mission, values, and organizational structure (see the Organizational Structure and
Responsibility Policy)
Code of conduct and ethics (see Standards of Conduct Policy)
Confidentiality and records handling (including CJIS compliance, if applicable)
Workplace harassment and discrimination prevention (see the Discriminatory Harassment Policy)
Safety procedures and emergency protocols
Relevant department policies and procedures
Role-specific expectations and duties

207.5.3 CAPS ACCREDITATION TRAINING
Best Practice MODIFIED
The following list includes but is not limited to training that is suggested by the California Accreditation for
Public Safety Program standards for all officers. Training shall minimally conform to POST requirements.
Refresher training will be provided to all officers and thereafter on an as needed basis including:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)

Review of any new, updated, or high-risk policies.
Search and seizure (see the Contacts and Temporary Detentions, and Custodial Searches policies).
Body-worn cameras (see the Body-Worn Cameras Policy).
Domestic violence involving officers.
Legal and legislative updates.
Strategic communication techniques.
Hazardous materials (see the Hazardous Material Response Policy).
First aid/CPR/AED.
Mental health/crisis intervention.
Use of military equipment.

Other accreditation-mandated training requirements are included in the applicable policies.
207.5.4 LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
Best Practice MODIFIED
The Training Sergeant or the authorized designee shall establish a plan to train and develop personnel for
future leadership responsibilities as funding and resources allow. The plan shall focus on providing fair and
appropriate professional development opportunities, including mentorship, leadership training or academies
and other opportunities designed to enhance supervisory and management knowledge, skills, and abilities.
207.6 TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Discretionary MODIFIED
The Training Unit will conduct an annual training-needs assessment of the Department. The needs
assessment will be reviewed by staff. Upon approval by the staff, the needs assessment will form the basis
for the training plan for the fiscal year.
207.6 207.6.1 TRAINING COMMITTEE
Agency Content
The Training Sergeant shall meet yearly establish a Training Committee, which will serve to assist with the
various training discipline leaders to determine the identifying training needs for the Department.
The Training Committee shall be comprised of Department leaders responsible for perishable skills training,
a Command level representative who can identify potential training needs based on reviews conducted by the
Critical Incident Review Board (CIRB) during the preceding year and subject matter experts from other training
disciplines as appropriate.
The Training Committee should convene on a regular basis as determined by the Training Sergeant to identify
and assess training needs prior to developing the annual training plan. The Training Sergeant will consider
the recommendations of the committee and determine what training should be addressed, taking into
consideration the mission of the Department and available resources.

Page 49 of 56

Page 50 of 56

207.7 TRAINING PROCEDURES
Best Practice MODIFIED
a)

All employees assigned to attend training shall attend as scheduled unless previously excused by
their immediate supervisor. Excused absences from mandatory training should be limited to the
following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Court appearances
Vacation
Sick leave
Physical limitations preventing the employee’s participation
Emergency situations

When an employee is unable to attend mandatory training, that employee shall:
1.
2.

Notify his/her their supervisor as soon as possible.
Make arrangements through his/her supervisor and the Training Sergeant to attend the required
training on an alternate date.

207.8 DAILY TRAINING BULLETINS
Best Practice MODIFIED
The Lexipol Daily Training Bulletins (DTBs) is a web-accessed system that provides training on the Vallejo
Police Department Policy Manual and other important topics. Generally, one training bulletin is available for
each day of the month. However, the number of DTBs may be adjusted by the Professional Standards
Lieutenant.
Personnel assigned to participate in DTBs should only use the password and login name assigned to them by
the Training Sergeant. Personnel should not share their password with others and should frequently change
their password to protect the security of the system. After each session, employees should log off the system
to prevent unauthorized access. The content of the DTBs is copyrighted material and shall not be shared with
others outside of the Department.
Employees who are assigned to participate in the DTB program should complete each DTB at the beginning
of their shift or as otherwise directed by their supervisor. Employees should not allow uncompleted DTBs to
build up over time. Personnel may be required to complete DTBs missed during extended absences (e.g.,
vacation, medical leave) upon returning to duty.
Supervisors will be responsible for monitoring the progress of personnel under their command to ensure
compliance with this policy.
207.9 POLICY
Best Practice
The Department shall administer a training program that will meet the standards of federal, state,
local, and POST training requirements. It is a priority of this department to provide continuing
education and training for the professional growth and development of its members.
207.9 TRAINING SERGEANT
Best Practice
The Chief of Police shall designate a Training Sergeant who is responsible for developing, reviewing, updating,
and maintaining the department training plan so that required training is completed. The Training Sergeant
should review the training plan annually.
207.10 TRAINING RESTRICTION
State
The Training Sergeant is responsible for establishing a process to identify officers who are restricted from
training other officers for the time period specified by law because of a sustained use of force complaint
(Government Code § 7286(b)).

Page 50 of 56

Page 51 of 56

Policy

Vallejo Police Department

207

Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Training Policy
207.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
It is the policy of this department to administer a training program that will provide for the
professional growth and continued development of its personnel. By doing so, the Department will
ensure its personnel possess the knowledge and skills necessary to provide a professional level
of service that meets the needs of the community.
207.2 PHILOSOPHY
The Department seeks to provide ongoing training and encourages all personnel to participate
in advanced training and formal education on a continual basis. Training is provided within the
confines of funding, requirements of a given assignment, staffing levels, and legal mandates.
Whenever possible, the Department will use courses certified by the California Commission on
Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST).
See attachment: Training Request 06052014.pdf
207.3 OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the Training Program are to:
(a)

Enhance the level of law enforcement service to the public.

(b)

Increase the technical expertise and overall effectiveness of our personnel.

(c)

Provide for continued professional development of department personnel.

(d)

Ensure compliance with POST rules and regulations concerning law enforcement
training.

207.4 TRAINING PLAN
A training plan will be developed and maintained by the Training Sergeant.
207.5 TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
The Training Unit will conduct an annual training-needs assessment of the Department. The needs
assessment will be reviewed by staff. Upon approval by the staff, the needs assessment will form
the basis for the training plan for the fiscal year.
207.6 TRAINING COMMITTEE
The Training Sergeant shall meet yearly with the various training discipline leaders to determine
the training needs for the Department.

Training Policy - 1

Page 51 of 56

Page 52 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Training Policy

207.7 TRAINING PROCEDURES
(a)

(b)

All employees assigned to attend training shall attend as scheduled unless previously
excused by their immediate supervisor. Excused absences from mandatory training
should be limited to the following:
1.

Court appearances

Vacation

Sick leave

Physical limitations preventing the employee’s participation.

Emergency situations

When an employee is unable to attend mandatory training, that employee shall:
1.

Notify his/her supervisor as soon as possible.

Make arrangements through his/her supervisor and the Training Sergeant to
attend the required training on an alternate date.

207.8 DAILY TRAINING BULLETINS
The Lexipol Daily Training Bulletins (DTBs) is a web-accessed system that provides training on
the Vallejo Police Department Policy Manual and other important topics. Generally, one training
bulletin is available for each day of the month. However, the number of DTBs may be adjusted
by the Professional Standards Lieutenant.
Personnel assigned to participate in DTBs should only use the password and login name assigned
to them by the Training Sergeant. Personnel should not share their password with others and
should frequently change their password to protect the security of the system. After each session,
employees should log off the system to prevent unauthorized access. The content of the DTBs is
copyrighted material and shall not be shared with others outside of the Department.
Employees who are assigned to participate in the DTB program should complete each DTB at the
beginning of their shift or as otherwise directed by their supervisor. Employees should not allow
uncompleted DTBs to build up over time. Personnel may be required to complete DTBs missed
during extended absences (e.g., vacation, medical leave) upon returning to duty.
Supervisors will be responsible for monitoring the progress of personnel under their command to
ensure compliance with this policy.
207.9 POLICY
The Department shall administer a training program that will meet the standards of federal, state,
local, and POST training requirements. It is a priority of this department to provide continuing
education and training for the professional growth and development of its members.

Training Policy - 2

Page 52 of 56

Page 53 of 56

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Training Policy

207.10 TRAINING SERGEANT
The Chief of Police shall designate a Training Sergeant who is responsible for developing,
reviewing, updating, and maintaining the department training plan so that required training is
completed. The Training Sergeant should review the training plan annually.
207.10.1 TRAINING RESTRICTION
The Training Sergeant is responsible for establishing a process to identify officers who are
restricted from training other officers for the time period specified by law because of a sustained
use of force complaint (Government Code § 7286(b)).

Training Policy - 3

Page 53 of 56

Page 54 of 56

Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Attachments

Attachments - 4

Page 54 of 56

Page 55 of 56

Attachment
Vallejo PD Policy Manual

Training Request 06052014.pdf
Training Request 06052014.pdf

Training Request 06052014.pdf - 5

Page 55 of 56

Page 56 of 56

Read the agenda documentPrimary source ↗

The government’s own published record — read it yourself, then decide what to do about it.

Add to your calendar.ics

Showing up is how towns win. Put it on the calendar before it slips.

How to speak at a meetingGuide →

Public comment is where cancellations start. Three minutes, plain words, your own story.

Surveillance in VallejoLocal report →

The cameras, the coverage, and the local record for this community.

Provenance

Where this record came from. Every source is listed, permanently.

Agenda Watch · Nov 3, 2026
DeFlock research desk · Nov 3, 2026

Permanent ID DKT-2026-002467 — this record is never deleted.

Record history

Every change to this record, logged as it happened.

Nov 3, 2026 Filed on the Docket
Nov 3, 2026 Full document archived — public record
Nov 3, 2026 Corroborated by another source DeFlock research desk

← The full Docket · every meeting, vote, and action on the permanent record · also in the National Record Index.

On the agenda: Vallejo Special Police Oversight & Accountability Commission — LICENSE PLATE READER (Nov 5)

The agenda, word for word

Provenance

Record history

More on the Docket in California