On the agenda: University Place meeting — automated license plate (Oct 19)

1.

6:30 P.M. City Council Regular Meeting Materials
Documents:
10-19-26 RM.PDF
AGENDA 10-19-26.PDF

UNIVERSITY PLACE CITY COUNCIL
Regular Council Meeting
Monday, October 19, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
Note: Times are approximate and subject to change.

PUBLIC NOTICE
The University Place City Council will hold its scheduled meetings to ensure essential city functions continue. Members of the
public can attend and participate in a Council meeting in the following manners:
 In-person at the City Council Chambers at 3609 Market Place West, Third Floor;
 Watch live broadcast on University Place Television or Comcast Channel 21;
 Watch live broadcast on the City’s YouTube channel www.YouTube.com\UniversityPlaceTV;
 Watch live broadcast on the City’s website www.cityofup.com/398/City-Council-Meetings;
 Listen by telephone by dialing 1 509-342-7253 United States, Spokane (Toll), Conference ID: 629 138 985#; or
 Attend virtually by clicking this hyper-link: Click here to join the meeting.
How to participate in Public Comment and public testimony on Public Hearings:


In-person at the City Council Chambers.

 Written comments are accepted via email. Comments should be sent to the City Clerk at [email protected]. Comments
received up to one hour (i.e., 5:30 p.m.) before the meeting will be provided to the City Council electronically.
 Participation by telephone. Call the telephone number listed above and enter the Conference ID number. Once the Mayor
calls for public comment, use the “Raise Hand” feature by pressing *5 on your phone. Your name or the last four digits of your
phone number will be called out when it is your turn to speak. Press *6 to un-mute yourself to speak.
 Participation by computer. Join the meeting virtually by clicking on the hyper-link above. Turn off your camera and
microphone before you press “Join Now.” Once the Mayor calls for public comment, use the “Raise Hand” icon on the Microsoft
Teams toolbar located at the top of your screen. Your screen name will be called out when it is your turn to speak. Turn on your
camera and microphone (icon located at the top of your screen) to unmute yourself. Once you are done, turn off your camera
and microphone.
In the event of technical difficulties, remote public participation may be limited.

AGENDA
1.

CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER

2.

ROLL CALL

3.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Wood

4.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

5.

PRESENTATIONS

7:00 pm

6.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

7:05 pm

7A. –
7F.

CONSENT AGENDA

6:30 pm

6:35 pm

• Filipino American History Month Proclamation
• Tacoma Public Utilities Proposed Rate Adjustments

Motion: Approve or Amend the Consent Agenda as Proposed
The Consent Agenda consists of items considered routine or have been previously studied and discussed by Council
and for which staff recommendation has been prepared. A Councilmember may request that an item be removed from
the Consent Agenda so that the Council may consider the item separately. Items on the Consent Agenda are voted
upon as one block and approved with one vote.
A. Approve the minutes of the 10/05/26 Council meeting as submitted.
B. Receive and File: 2026 Second Quarter Financial Report.

City Council Meeting Agenda
October 19, 2026, Page 2
C. Authorize the City Manager to increase Purchase Order No. 20260073 with Don Small & Sons Oil
Distributing Company by $13,224.00, including tax, to cover fuel purchases resulting from increased fuel
costs.
D. Adopt a Resolution approving the City of University Place addendum to the Region 5 Hazard Mitigation
Plan, 2025-2030 edition.
E. Adopt a Resolution approving a Labor Agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local 612, substantially in the form attached hereto.
F. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract for the 70th Avenue Phase 2 project with Sound Pacific
Construction, LLC in the amount of $1,029,015.00 and all necessary contract documents.

PUBLIC HEARING
7:10 pm

7:30 pm

8.

2027-2028 BIENNIAL CITY BUDGET

9.

CITY MANAGER & COUNCIL COMMENTS/REPORTS - (Report items/topics of interest from

• Staff Report

• Public Comment

outside designated agencies represented by Council members, e.g., AWC, PRSC, Pierce Transit, RCC, etc., and
follow-ups on items of interest to Council and the community.)

STUDY SESSION – (At this time, the Council will have the opportunity to study and discuss business issues with staff prior
to its consideration. Citizen comment is not taken at this time; however, citizens will have the opportunity to comment on the
following item(s) at future Council meetings.)
7:50 pm

10.

2027-2028 BIENNIAL BUDGET: EXPENDITURES, COMMUNITY GRANTS

8:30 pm

11.

2027 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA

9:00 pm

12.

ADJOURNMENT

*PRELIMINARY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 2, 2026
Regular Council Meeting
November 16, 2026
Regular Council Meeting
December 7, 2026
Regular Council Meeting
December 21, 2026
Regular Council Meeting
Preliminary City Council Agenda subject to change without notice*
Complete Agendas will be available 24 hours prior to scheduled meeting.
To obtain Council Agendas, please visit www.cityofup.com.
American Disability Act (ADA) Accommodations Provided Upon Advance Request
Call the City Clerk at 253-566-5656

PRESENTATIONS

CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Filipino Americans have made significant and enduring contributions to the
cultural, economic, educational, civic, military, and social life of communities throughout the
United States; and
WHEREAS, Filipino American History Month is celebrated every October in the United
States to honor the long history, culture, and contributions of Filipino Americans. It was
nationally recognized by the U.S. Congress in 2009 and commemorates the first recorded Filipino
presence in the continental U.S. on 18 October 1587 at Morro Bay, California; and
WHEREAS, Filipino Americans are among the largest Asian American communities in
the nation and have distinguished themselves through leadership, public service,
entrepreneurship, innovation, artistic achievement, and dedicated service in the Armed Forces of
the United States; and
WHEREAS, Filipino American educators, healthcare professionals, public servants,
business owners, labor leaders, community advocates, and cultural organizations continue to
enrich and strengthen our community through their talents, achievements, and commitment to
the public good; and
WHEREAS, Filipino American History Month provides an opportunity to recognize and
celebrate the rich history, heritage, traditions, and accomplishments of Filipino Americans, while
honoring the resilience, perseverance, and values they have contributed to our nation and our
local community; and
WHEREAS, promoting awareness and appreciation of Filipino American history and
culture helps foster greater understanding, inclusion, and unity among all residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of University Place hereby recognizes
October as FILIPINO AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH and encourages all residents to
celebrate the many contributions of Filipino Americans and to participate in educational, cultural,
and community activities that honor their history, heritage, and legacy.

PROCLAIMED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PLACE, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 19, 2026.

_____________________
Stan Flemming, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Emelita J. Genetia, City Clerk

tacoma public utilities & environmental services

2027-2028 Budget & Rates
We budget to provide clean, reliable services.

w h at r at e s c ov e r

Operating and
maintaining utility
systems

Ensuring
service reliability

Upgrading
technology to
support long-term
reliability

Protecting natural
resources around
facilities

fac to r s i m pac t i n g r at e s

Infrastructure costs

Increasing operational costs

•

Pole replacements

•

•

Electric system equipment
(transformers)

Competition for specialized
labor

•

New technology

•

Substation maintenance

•

Climate change adaptation

•

Drinking water main and pipe
replacements

•

Regulatory and legal compliance

•

Healthcare

•

Wastewater pipe replacements*

•

Preparing and maintaining for
long-term reliability

h ow w e c o n t r o l c o s t s

h ow to low e r yo u r b i l l

•

Rebuild & maintain equipment
instead of buying new

•

•

Prioritize projects for safety &
reliability

Take advantage of conservation
rebates and incentives, as well
as grants, loans and assistance
programs, for those who qualify

•

Maintain current staffing levels

•

Recycle more

•

Secure awards, grants, and other
funding that doesn’t come from
customers

•

Fix water leaks

•

Monitor power and water usage
on MyAccount

•

Encourage recycling

•

Reduce operations and
maintenance costs

*City of Tacoma only

5937 0526 WEB

Learn more about the budget and
get involved at MyTPU.org/Rates.

tacoma public utilities & environmental services

2027-2028 Residential Rate Proposals
Tacoma Public Utilities will present our 2027-2028 budgets to the Public Utility Board and Tacoma City Council this fall for
consideration and approval. Our proposals include rate adjustments for Tacoma Power and Tacoma Water.
Environmental Services will also present their budget and proposed rate adjustments to City Council in the fall. Their services
include Wastewater, Stormwater, and Solid Waste.
The proposals show the estimated average monthly adjustment as a percentage and dollar amount.

tac o m a p ow e r
r at e a dj u s t m e n t g o e s i n to e f f e c t i n a p r i l e ac h y e a r

2027

2028

6.2% or $7.40 monthly*

6.2% or $8.59 monthly*

tac o m a wat e r
r at e a dj u s t m e n t g o e s i n to e f f e c t i n j a n u a r y e ac h y e a r

2027

2028

Inside City of
Tacoma

5.6% or $2.99 monthly

5.6% or $3.17 monthly

Outside City of
Tacoma

5.6% or $3.59 monthly*

5.6% or $3.74 monthly*

e n v i r o n m e n ta l s e r v i c e s
r at e a dj u s t m e n t g o e s i n to e f f e c t i n j a n u a r y e ac h y e a r

2027
Stormwater

8% or $2.90 monthly

8.6% or $3.42 monthly

Wastewater

5.5% or $4.29 monthly

5.8% or $4.75 monthly

Solid Waste

5.2% or $3.24 monthly

5.2% or $3.42 monthly

*Rates in University Place are slightly higher due
to a 6% utility tax from the City of U.P.
5937(A) 0726 WEB

2028

TPU Proposed Rate Adjustments
2027-2028
Rosa McLeod, Regional Government Relations Manager
Tacoma Public Utilities
October 19, 2026

Mission and Vision
MISSION
We deliver clean, reliable services
essential to quality of life.
VISION
We will be a trusted community partner,
where employees are proud to deliver
equitable, affordable utility services.

Services

Public Utility Board

Tacoma Power Service Territory

198,263 Customers
•
•
•
•

55% accounts inside Tacoma
45% accounts outside Tacoma
173,466 residential accounts
24,797 commercial/industrial accounts

Tacoma Water Service Territory

111,585 Customers
•
•
•
•

60% inside Tacoma
40% outside Tacoma
103,816 residential
7,769 commercial/industrial

Budget Process

Expenditure
Projections

Revenue
Sources

Cost-ofService
Analysis

Rate Design

Factors Impacting Rates
Infrastructure Costs
• Pole replacements
• Electric system equipment (transformers)
• Substation maintenance
• Drinking water main and pipe replacements
• Preparing and maintaining for long-term
reliability

Increasing Operational Costs
• Competition for specialized labor
• New technology
• Climate change adaptation
• Regulatory and legal compliance
• Health care

2027-2028 Residential Rate Proposal

Power
• 2027: 6.3% or about $7.76 monthly
• 2028: 6.3% or about $8.35 monthly
Water
2027: 5.6% or about $2.99 monthly
2028: 5.6% or about $3.17 monthly

Residential Power Rate Comparisons

Managing Cost and Affordability
How we control costs
• Rebuild & maintain equipment instead of
buying new
• Prioritize projects for safety & reliability
• Maintain current staff levels
• Secure awards, grants, and other funding
that doesn’t come from customers
• Reduce operations and maintenance costs

Ways to Save
How customers can lower their
bill
• Take advantage of conservation rebates
and incentives, as well as grants, loans,
and assistance programs, for those who
qualify
• Fix water leaks
• Monitor power and water usage on
MyAccount

How to lower your costs
•

Conservation — lowers your cost and good for
the environment

•

Zero-interest and deferred loans - support for
energy efficient home improvement projects
•

•

Incentives for Rental Properties Serving IncomeQualified Tenants Program

Payment assistance – programs available for
income-qualifying customers, including seniors
and people living with a disability

2026 Budget & Rates Timeline

14

Learn More, Get Involved
• Visit our website: 0\738RUJ5DWHV
• Review information about our rates
• Listen to recorded meetings
• Submit comments

• Attend community meetings
• Attend public hearings
• Subscribe to our email newsletter
15

Contact

Rosa McLeod
Regional Government Relations Manager
[email protected]
C: 253-778-3785
16

APPROVAL OF
CONSENT AGENDA

CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE
DRAFT MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the City Council
Monday, October 5, 2026

1.

CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER

Mayor Flemming called the Regular Meeting to order at 6:33 p.m.
2.

ROLL CALL

Roll call was taken by the City Clerk as follows:
Councilmember Figueroa
Councilmember Boykin
Councilmember Cunningham
Councilmember Wood
Councilmember Grassi
Mayor Pro Tem McCluskey
Mayor Flemming

Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present

Staff Present: City Manager Sugg, City Attorney Kaser, Police Chief Burke, Administrative Services Director
Petorak, Public Works Director Ecklund, Public Safety Director Hales, Community and Economic Director
Briske, Finance Director Oh, and City Clerk Genetia.
3.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Councilmember Boykin led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
4.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem McCluskey, seconded by Councilmember Figueroa, to approve the agenda.
The motion carried.
5.

PRESENTATIONS

Jim Lineweaver Recognition – Mayor Fleming and the City Council honored Jim Lineweaver for his
exceptional leadership and unwavering commitment to the University Place community, congratulating him
on his retirement after years of leading Families Unlimited Network and collaborating with the City to deliver
food assistance, housing-related support, and other vital services to residents.
State of the Library Update – Pierce County Library System Executive Director Gretchen Caserotti and
Library Operations Supervisor Anton briefed the Council on Pierce County Library System operations,
finances, programming, capital needs, and University Place branch usage. The University Place branch
recorded approximately 180,000 visitors and 305,000 checkouts in 2025, with about 65,000 materials
housed locally.
Public Safety Advisory Commission Report - Public Safety Advisory Commission Chair Calhoun reported
that traffic safety has been a Commission priority since 2021, accounting for six of nine meetings in 2024
and nine of seventeen meetings in 2025–2026. She noted that a 2024 survey found over 50% support and
about 35% opposition to traffic cameras, with an October 2025 focus group showing particularly strong
support for school-zone cameras. She requested direction on whether to continue research on the issue
and what questions or subject matter experts should be prioritized in the Commission’s 2027 work plan.
6.
PUBLIC COMMENT – The following individual provided comments: Gordon McCreary, 4109 Sunset
Drive West.

City Council Minutes of October 5, 2026
Page 2

7.

CONSENT AGENDA

MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem McCluskey, seconded by Councilmember Cunningham, to approve the
Consent Agenda as follows:
A. Approve the minutes of the 09/12/26 and 09/21/26 Council meetings as submitted.
B. Receive and File: Payroll for periods ending 08/31/26, 09/15/26, and 09/30/26; Claims dated 09/30/26.
C. Receive and File: Indigenous Peoples’ Day Proclamation.
D. Receive and File: Breast Cancer Awareness Month Proclamation.
The motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
8. 2026 CARRYFORWARD BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Staff Report – Finance Director Oh presented the proposed 2026 carryforward budget adjustment, which
incorporates unspent 2025 appropriations into the 2026 budget. She reported that expenditure and revenue
estimates had been updated based on current information, grant funding, and new funding requests. She
explained that the largest carryforwards are associated with multi-year capital projects in parks, public
works, and municipal facilities, as well as expenditures within the general, street, policy and public safety,
stormwater management, and internal service funds. Following the finalization of 2025 revenues and
expenditures, staff identified approximately $1.6 million in available one-time funds. After recommending
funding for parks and other projects, approximately $774,000 remained and was designated to ending fund
balance. Director Oh also confirmed that the City will proceed with repayment of its remaining 2016 bond,
discussed as approximately $17.1 million, and noted that the updated forecast included in the staff report
reflects ending fund balances after completion of the bond repayment.
Public Comment – None.
Council Consideration - MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem McCluskey, seconded by Councilmember Figueroa,
to pass an Ordinance amending the 2025-2026 Biennial Budget for 2025 Carryforward and other
adjustments.
The motion carried. (ORDINANCE NO. 802)
9. CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL COMMENTS/REPORTS
City Manager Sugg announced the annual Oktoberfest for October 9 from 4:30 to 9:00 p.m. at Market
Square, featuring music, a beer garden, food trucks, children’s activities, and South Sound Makers Market
participation.
Public Works Director Ecklund reported that final utility adjustments are underway this week for the Cirque
Drive project, with pavement striping scheduled for Wednesday through Friday, weather permitting. Minor
lane closures are expected during striping operations, and the project is anticipated to be completed next
week.
Councilmember Grassi highlighted recent business and community developments, including the openings
of Cornerstone Caregiving, Scenthound, and Kiddie Academy. She also recognized the return of youth
recreation programs through the City’s partnership with the YMCA and School District; commended the
Economic Development team for hosting a successful Business Resource Expo; acknowledged the Breast
Cancer Awareness Month; and highlighted Swank Boutique’s one-year anniversary.
Councilmember Wood reported that he toured shoreline access sites with the UP Shoreline Access
Coalition and attended a SSHĀ³P Coalition meeting, where housing funding, land use policy, affordable
housing incentives, and accessibility-focused housing design were discussed. The meeting also included
an update from the South King Housing and Homeless Partner Capital Fund (SKIP) and an announcement
seeking advisory board members with housing and development expertise.

City Council Minutes of October 5, 2026
Page 3

Councilmember Cunningham reported that declining cable television activity is reducing traditional funding
and revenue sources for Rainier Connect and city communications. A tiered funding structure is being
considered, with each participating city responsible for an affordable share while preserving required video,
social-media, and public-communication services.
Councilmember Boykin recognized community leaders for their service, acknowledged the legacy of Dr.
Harold Moss, and reported attending local business events. He also provided updates on federal advocacy
work, the Business Expo, library outreach efforts, and city committees focused on governance and service
improvements.
Mayor Pro Tem McCluskey reported that she and Mayor Fleming will travel to India with regional mayors,
council members, and a state representative at the invitation of the Indian Consulate. She also reported on
National League of Cities advocacy involving transportation, infrastructure, artificial intelligence, water,
climate action, and weather forecasting; Zoo Trek Authority meeting discussions; and UP for Arts gala
supporting 2027 programming.
Mayor Flemming thanked the library system for its partnership and community service, recognized the
Council’s honor of Jim Lineweaver, highlighted the significant impact of Families Unlimited Network in
distributing food and serving residents, provided a brief update on the upcoming India delegation trip, and
noted the ribbon cutting for Kiddie Academy as an important step in expanding childcare and early learning
opportunities in University Place.
STUDY SESSION
10. 2027-2028 BIENNIAL BUDGET: GENERAL OVERVIEW AND REVENUES
Finance Director Oh presented the proposed 2027-2028 Biennial Budget, which was submitted to the City
Clerk on October 1, 2026. She stated that the proposed budget is balanced and based on conservative
financial assumptions related to compensation, staffing, capital requests, and revenue projections. The
budget assumes a 4.5% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for 2027, based on the June-to-June CPI-U, and
a 3% COLA for 2028. Director Oh noted that the City has historically aligned COLA increases with CPI-U
data, while also considering the results of union negotiations, and that the final adjustment may vary
depending on overall budget conditions. The proposed budget includes the addition of one full-time
equivalent position in the City Attorney’s Department and reallocates 25% of an existing Surface Water
Management (SWM)-funded position to recreation services, resulting in a funding split of 75% SWM and
25% recreation.
Director Oh reported that the City is projecting modest declines in general sales tax, real estate excise tax,
cable and telephone utility tax revenues, and investment interest earnings. She explained that these
projections reflect ongoing economic uncertainty, reduced construction and real estate activity, declining
communications-related revenues, and lower cash balances following repayment of the 2016 bond. She
further noted that state-shared revenues vary in reliability depending on the statutory or distribution formula
applicable to each source. In developing revenue forecasts, the City utilized MRSC guidance where
appropriate and adopted conservative assumptions to minimize the risk of actual revenues falling below
budgeted amounts. She added that impact fee revenue assumptions remain difficult to predict due to the
uncertainty of development project timing.
Director Oh also advised that the proposed budget does not include any school liaison officer
reimbursement revenue because the Pierce County Sheriff’s Office is currently unable to fill the position.
She explained that under the normal arrangement, the Sheriff’s Office bills the City for the position, the City
in turn bills the school district, and expenditure credits are applied for any unfilled positions or hours not
worked.
Discussion was held regarding the new FTE position, and a future report was requested to outline the
workload and justification for adding a full-time Assistant City Attorney.
11. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
Administrative Services Director Petorak presented the City’s five-year Hazard Mitigation Plan, which

City Council Minutes of October 5, 2026
Page 4

focuses on protecting life and property, maintaining government operations, strengthening emergency
partnerships, improving public preparedness, protecting environmental resources, and supporting
economic recovery. She emphasized that the Plan is a living document and may be updated throughout
the five-year cycle, noting prior amendments related to pandemic response and the Day Island Bridge
project.
Adoption of the Plan maintains eligibility for federal mitigation grants, including the Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program and Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program. Current and proposed
mitigation efforts include regional emergency management coordination, development of a recovery plan,
backup power improvements, traffic signal upgrades, emergency access and shelter planning, satellite
internet backup, Day Island Bridge replacement, utility undergrounding, tree management, seismic retrofit
outreach, and updated evacuation routes.
Hazard preparedness education will continue for elected officials, employees, residents, and businesses.
Due to limited FEMA Emergency Management Institute course availability, the regional coalition is pursuing
local tabletop exercises while staff explores additional training opportunities. The City maintains a grantfunded shelter trailer at the Public Works facility equipped to support approximately 100 individuals. Staff
will review sheltering procedures to further clarify resource allocation, medical support, staffing needs, and
regional coordination.
Director Petorak noted that the Health in All Policies matrix was applied to the Plan and determined that it
supports community health objectives without requiring amendments. She noted the tool may be valuable
in evaluating long-term disaster recovery efforts.
Pierce County approved the Plan in July 2026 without revisions and forwarded it to FEMA for review.
Following Council adoption, the Plan will be submitted through county and state channels, with FEMA
approval anticipated in early 2027. Staff will continue implementing priority projects and updating the Plan
as needed.
Discussion followed regarding continuity of essential business operations during a major evacuation and
medical support at shelters, and the recurring flooding on the South Spit. Director Petorak stated that staff
would research Flood Mitigation Assistance program requirements, including potential flood-insurance
eligibility barriers. Mayor Flemming directed staff to add language addressing protection of the South Spit
road through elevation, repair, or other engineering solutions.
12. SHELTER AND SPORTS FIELD RESERVATION SYSTEM
The Council agreed by consensus to defer agenda item 12 to a later meeting, with the City Manager and
staff to identify a future date.
13.

ADJOURNMENT - The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. No other action was taken.

Submitted by,

Emy Genetia
City Clerk

INTRODUCTION
The second Quarter 2026 Financial Report is presented here for review. As in prior years, the report has been
prepared on an accrual basis, ensuring that revenues are recorded in the period they are earned, regardless of when
they are received.
Due to a standard lag in the receipt of revenues collected by external entities—such as the State of Washington (2month lag) and Pierce County (1-month lag) - the City accrues these revenues back to the period in which they were
deemed receivable. These accruals primarily include taxes and other state-shared revenues, ensuring a more
accurate reflection of the City’s financial position for the reporting period.
This report has been prepared in alignment with the City Council’s request for detailed information on individual
revenue sources and expenditures. It is intended to provide transparency and insight into the City’s financial
performance.
Overall, the City’s second quarter general government revenues came in 13.37% above budget estimates. On the
expenditure side, second quarter spending (excluding reserves and transfers) is 17.39% below budget, reflecting
conservative spending patterns and timing differences in planned expenditures.
The City’s current financial forecast indicates that existing revenues are sufficient to support ongoing services as
well as legal and contractual obligations through the remainder of the current biennium. This reflects a stable fiscal
position and effective budget management.
Please note that this report is a continuing work in progress. If there is any additional analysis, trend data, or specific
information you would like to see included in future reports, we welcome your feedback and will make every effort
to incorporate your requests.
If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this report, please do not hesitate to contact Grace
Oh, Finance Director. We welcome your feedback and are happy to provide any additional details or clarification as
needed.

City of University Place

2

Second Quarter 2026

ON-GOING OPERATING REVENUES

Overall, the City’s on-going operating revenues are 13.37% above 2026 budget estimates. The table below lists all
on-going revenues with a 2026 Budget to Actual Variance. Details of major variances are discussed following the
table.
Property Tax
Sales Tax - General
Sales Tax - 1% for Parks
Sales Tax - Affordable & Supportive Housing
Utility Tax
Leasehold Excise Tax - State Shared
Admission Tax
Solicitor Permit Fees
Business License Fees
Franchise Fees
City Assistance - State Shared
Liquor Excise Tax - State Shared
Liquor Profits - State Shared
Investment Interest
Field Rentals
Development Services - Fees
Fuel Taxes - State Shared
ROW Vacation
Transportation Benefit District Fees
Real Estate Excise Tax
Criminal Justice Sales Tax - State Shared
Criminal Justice Funding - State Shared
Gambling Tax
Law Enforcement/DUI Restitution
SRO/UPSD Reimbursement
Alarm Permit Fees
False Alarm Fees
Court Fees
Animal Control - Pet Licenses
Parking Meters
SWM Fees
SWM - Drainage Inventory Fees
SWM - System Development Charges
Public Record/Tapes/Transcripts
Fines/Forfeitures
Insurance Recoveries
Penalty & Interest
Judgements & Settlements
Miscellaneous
Total

2023
Actual
2,468,317
2,195,948
227,226
6,562
2,478,685
3,085
119,451
125
50,109
1,916,801
46,940
131,200
135,399
1,060,050
7,980
254,336
350,584
116,815
587,070
403,520
67,926
47,840
41,105
4,400
21,371
18,554
1,570,695
200

2024
Actual
3,677,101
2,119,756
232,172
5,842
2,478,679
1,734
135,579
100
47,122
1,916,801
47,470
121,294
134,297
1,381,683
12,443
234,086
334,465
13,000
118,449
981,479
411,269
72,232
38,436
44,818
4,600
15,147
16,059
1,649,094
900

874
55,287
21,933
61,073
15,777
14,487,240

874
55,287
21,933
61,073
15,777
16,401,050

2025
Actual
3,754,243
2,222,637
241,363
6,558
2,709,978
4,419
135,277
100
50,615
2,034,805
68,458
109,906
133,163
1,180,957
24,300
343,069
154,456
725,879
455,389
81,865
47,386
63,540
48,784
1,550
28,773
17,114
14,980
2,103,825
150
6,418
121
39,568
25,140
2,231
16,966
16,853,982

2026
Budget
2nd Qtr Budget
7,208,772
3,604,386
4,284,420
2,142,210
469,246
234,623
25,413
6,099
4,770,045
2,385,023
5,200
2,600
226,666
113,333
125
63
96,910
48,455
3,711,344
1,855,672
78,440
39,220
238,323
119,162
267,750
133,875
558,801
279,401
9,090
4,545
954,630
477,315
702,271
351,136
488,168
244,084
1,250,000
625,000
846,683
423,342
147,896
73,948
92,000
46,000
123,330
61,665
79,568
39,784
12,241
6,121
34,760
17,380
33,663
16,832
40,000
20,000
4,577,930
2,288,965
360
180
128,380
64,190
20,000
10,000
16,600
8,300
9,309
4,655
21,500
1,250
31,529,834
15,748,810

Actual
3,812,608
2,507,603
255,832
3,614
2,709,978
4,419
186,692
475
47,485
2,034,805
68,458
109,906
133,163
1,056,361
22,040
255,780
343,069
236,513
785,426
455,389
81,865
42,956
849
76,830
40,760
1,900
30,455
13,141
16,113
2,388,129
1,150
12,211
98
20,163
16,000
24,885
57,748
17,854,867

2ndQtr Budget to Actual
$ Variance
% Variance
208,222
5.78%
365,393
17.06%
21,209
9.04%
(2,485)
-40.74%
324,955
13.62%
1,819
69.96%
73,359
64.73%
413
660.00%
(970)
-2.00%
179,133
9.65%
29,238
74.55%
(9,255)
-7.77%
(712)
-0.53%
776,961
278.08%
17,495
384.93%
(221,535)
-46.41%
-2.30%
(8,067)
n/a
(7,571)
-3.10%
160,426
25.67%
32,048
7.57%
7,917
10.71%
(3,044)
-6.62%
849
n/a
15,165
n/a
976
2.45%
(4,221)
-68.96%
13,075
75.23%
(3,691)
-21.93%
(3,887)
-19.44%
99,164
4.33%
970
538.89%
98
10,163
7,700
20,230
56,498
2,158,037

n/a
n/a
101.63%
92.77%
434.64%
4519.83%
13.37%

General Sales Tax revenues for the second quarter of 2026 are 17.06% above budget estimates. The 1% Sales Tax
for Parks outperformed expectations, coming in 9.04% above budget. Because sales tax revenues fluctuate month
to month, a simple quarterly comparison may not fully reflect underlying trends. To provide a clearer picture of how
2026 revenues compare to typical monthly patterns, detailed monthly data and analysis are provided on page 7.
Utility Tax revenues for the second quarter of 2026 exceeded budget estimates by 13.62%, resulting in a positive
variance of $324,955. This strong performance reflects higher-than-anticipated collections across several utility
categories. For a detailed breakdown of utility tax revenues by category, please refer to page 10 of this report.
Admission Tax revenues for the second quarter of 2026 are 64.73% above budget estimates. Admission Tax
revenues for the second quarter of 2026 are 64.73% above budget estimates, primarily due to higher-thananticipated activity and revenues from the golf course.
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) collections for the second quarter of 2026 totaled $785,426, which is 25.67% above
budget estimates. All sales of real estate are taxed at 1.78%, of which 1.28% goes towards state funding of K-12
education and public works assistance and the city receives 0.5% for capital purposes.
Investment Interest revenues continue to perform strongly, totaling $1,056,361 for the second quarter - exceeding
budget estimates by 278.08%. This result is expected and is primarily due to the delay in paying off the bond, which
allowed cash to remain in the investment account longer than originally anticipated. As a result, investment balances
and related earnings have remained higher than projected.

City of University Place

3

Second Quarter 2026

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Overall, 2026 Second Quarter operating expenditures are 17.39% below budget (excluding Reserves and
contingency). Expenditures are presented by department.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

City Manager’s Office: City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Community Events and Beautification
Finance
Administrative Services: Human Resources, Reception, City Clerk and Communications
Community and Economic Development: Economic Development, Development Services and Fire Code Official
Public Works and Parks Maintenance: Public Works – Streets and Parks Maintenance
Surface Water Management: Public Works – SWM and Engineering – SWM
Police and Public Safety: Court, City Attorney, EOC, Police, Public Safety, Animal Control, Code Enforcement
and Jail
Engineering – General Fund
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
1st Quarter Comparison
2023-2026
2023

2024

2025

Actual

Actual

Actual

City Council

47,695

61,123

61,523

City Manager's Office

173,586

204,557

Finance

235,292

285,630

2026
Total Budget

$

Budget to Actual Variance

2ndQtr Budget

Actual

$

145,666

$

$ Variance

% Variance

(14,732)

-9.18%

320,797

$

160,399

228,665

1,135,346

$

567,673

580,213

12,540

2.21%

306,015

1,357,064

$

678,532

747,294

68,762

10.13%

Administrative Svcs

331,982

408,854

467,287

2,375,625

$ 1,187,813

827,864

(359,949)

-30.30%

Community & Economic Development

541,346

590,499

661,052

3,429,644

$ 1,714,822

1,330,756

(384,066)

-22.40%
-26.76%

Public Works & Parks

414,906

558,976

646,259

4,123,778

$ 2,061,889

1,510,044

(551,845)

SWM

794,518

512,949

547,656

2,501,761

$ 1,250,881

1,277,091

26,210

2.10%

1,391,805

1,607,729

2,034,257

9,436,835

$ 4,718,418

3,731,005

(987,412)

-20.93%

Police/Public Safety
Engineering

City of University Place

116,239

144,581

131,904

748,502

4,047,369

4,374,898

5,084,616

25,429,352

4

$

374,251

353,129

(21,122)

-5.64%

12,714,676

10,503,062

$ (2,211,614)

-17.39%

Second Quarter 2026

POLICE/PUBLIC SAFETY FUND REVENUES AND EXPENSES
Public Safety revenues for the second quarter of 2026 are 6.33% above budget estimates, with mixed performance
across individual revenue sources:
•
•
•
•

•

Local Criminal Justice Sales Tax is 7.57% above budget.
Court Fee revenues are 75.23% above budget, reflecting stronger-than-expected collections.
Alarm Permit revenues came in 2.45% above the adopted budget.
False Alarm Fees are 68.96% below estimates, continuing a trend of reduced false alarm incidents as permit
holders take steps to avoid penalties.
Animal Control revenues are 21.93% below budget

Total Public Safety expenditures for the second quarter of 2026 are 20.93% below budget estimates.
2nd Quarter

REVENUES
Property Tax
Local Criminal Justice Sales Tax
Utility Tax - Water
Gambling Tax
Alarm Permit Fees
Criminal Justice Funding - State Shared
Liquor Profits Tax - Public Safety
Law Enforcement Svces/DUI Response
UPSD/SRO Reimbursement
Personnel Services
SWM Administrative Fee - City Attorney
Drug Investigation Fund
False Alarms
Penalty/Interest
Court Fees
Animal Control - Licenses
Animal Control - Penalty/Int
Grant - CJTC Wellness
Miscellaneous
Total Revenues
Expenditures
Municipal Court
Emergency Preparedness
Legal Services
Police
Public Safety
Animal Control
Code Enforcement
Jail
Total Expenditures

City of University Place

2023
Actual

2024
Actual

2025
Actual

Budget

2,468,317
403,520
261,529
47,840
41,105
67,926
30,099
-

3,677,101
411,269
281,760
38,436
44,818
72,232
30,099
-

32,479
6
4,400
73
21,371
18,554
10,000
4,435,120

38,885
6
4,600
79
15,147
16,059
3,150
4,633,641

3,754,243
214,651
47,386
48,784
39,634
29,807
63,540
500
38,885
6
1,550
121
28,773
17,114
4,284,994

7,208,772
846,683
586,558
92,000
79,568
147,896
59,521
123,330
93,922
12,241
34,760
33,663
9,318,914

157,657
12,845
205,760
2,277,032
69,996
71,240
87,563
28,946
2,911,039

169,973
18,494
238,094
3,173,776
133,574
68,517
86,921
43,139
3,932,487

163,700
154
278,714
3,411,278
177,883
55,822
79,881
43,139
4,210,570

402,638
64,450
569,574
7,360,692
439,657
230,531
203,170
166,123
9,436,835

5

2026
2nd Qtr Budget
3,604,386
423,342
293,279
46,000
39,784
73,948
29,761
61,665

Actual

Budget to Actual
$ Variance % Variance

46,961
6,121
17,380
16,832
4,659,457

3,812,608
455,389
326,319
42,956
40,760
81,865
29,602
849
76,830
600
40,849
1,900
30,455
13,141
183
4,954,306

208,222
32,048
33,040
(3,044)
976
7,917
(158)
849
15,165
600
(6,112)
(4,221)
13,075
(3,691)
183
294,849

5.78%
7.57%
11.27%
-6.62%
2.45%
10.71%
-0.53%
n/a
24.59%
n/a
-13.02%
n/a
-68.96%
n/a
75.23%
-21.93%
n/a
n/a
n/a
6.33%

201,319
32,225
284,787
3,680,346
219,829
115,266
101,585
83,062
4,718,418

172,320
752
247,567
2,853,731
188,894
97,025
82,061
88,656
3,731,005

(29,000)
(31,473)
(37,220)
(826,615)
(30,934)
(18,241)
(19,524)
5,594
(987,412)

-14.40%
-97.67%
-13.07%
-22.46%
-14.07%
-15.83%
-19.22%
6.74%
-20.93%

Second Quarter 2026

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND REVENUES AND EXPENSES
Development Services revenues for the second quarter of 2026 are 46.41% below budget estimates. These fees
are collected for permits, planning, engineering, and fire code official reviews.
At the same time, expenditures are 13.32% below budget, reflecting cost savings or delays in planned spending.
Development Services
2023

2024

2025

Actual

Budget

2026

2nd Qtr Budget

Actual

Budget to Actual
$ Variance % Variance

Actual

Actual

Fees
Building Fees

169,877

186,382

242,698

708,716

354,358

160,631

(193,728)

Planning Fees

21,051

6,367

21,737

49,952

24,976

26,380

1,404

5.62%

Fire Fees

17,310

10,322

27,124

87,128

43,564

16,638

(26,926)

-61.81%

REVENUES

Engineering Fees

$

-54.67%

46,098

31,015

33,148

108,834

54,417

52,132

(2,285)

-4.20%

254,336

234,086

324,707

954,630

477,315

255,780

(221,535)

-46.41%

Other Sources
Transfer in: General Fund

-

-

-

-

-

-

Transfer In: SWM Fund

-

-

-

-

-

Grant - Housing Plan

-

-

-

-

-

Grants

-

25,000

25,000

-

-

Personnel Services

-

-

-

10,000

5,000

-

1,516

216

-

-

-

5,346

482,315

261,126
-14.04%

Miscellaneous Revenue

255,852

259,302

349,707

974,630

EXPENDITURES
Development Services

Total Revenues

953,742

1,013,675

1,215,171

$ 2,432,214

1,216,107

1,045,416

(170,691)

Fire Control

52,111

62,372

58,034

128,560

64,280

64,419

139

0.22%

1,005,853

1,076,047

1,273,205

2,560,774

1,280,387

1,109,835

(170,552)

-13.32%

Total Expendiutures

City of University Place

6

$

Second Quarter 2026

INDIVIDUAL REVENUES
The information presented below provides a detailed look at the major revenues for the city.

Sales Tax

Sales tax is a cyclical revenue source, and as such, the City takes a conservative approach to budgeting in this area.
Revenue collections tend to fluctuate throughout the year, with certain months generating significantly higher
returns. Therefore, a simple budget-to-actual comparison for a single quarter may not provide a complete picture
of overall performance.
As illustrated in the chart on page 3, second-quarter sales tax revenues exceed budget estimates by 18.30%, or
$387,847. Below are more detailed breakdowns by month of the figures shown on page 3.

Local Sales Tax Revenue
Monthly Comparison
MONTH
January
February
March
April
May
June
Total

$

$

Taxable Sales

2023
Actual
328,091
345,634
366,674
368,415
386,171
400,963
2,195,948

2024
Actual
338,991
325,862
354,752
350,714
369,946
379,491
2,119,756

$

$

$ 261,422,333

$ 252,351,905

$

$

2025
Actual
324,652
314,703
385,902
372,709
411,077
413,594
2,222,637

$ 264,599,643

$

$

2026
Actual
353,339
391,052
461,714
416,838
417,086
467,574
2,507,603

$ 298,524,193

Local Sales Tax Revenue
2nd Quarter By Category
Category
Retail Trade
Services
Construction
Accommodation and Food Svce
Information
Arts, Entertain, Recreation
Admin, Supp, Med Svces
Transp/Warehousing/Utilities
Wholesaling
Manufacturing
Other
Finance/Insur/Real Estate
Government
Total

$

$

2023
Actual
841,294
40,389
523,638
192,711
90,964
61,473
144,993
18,776
76,322
24,701
135,427
44,528
732
2,195,948

$

$

2024
Actual
882,141
48,269
376,706
199,565
98,238
73,024
146,488
18,658
76,855
34,671
113,949
47,394
3,798
2,119,756

$

$

2025
Actual
896,270
69,739
437,035
200,443
96,425
71,558
154,569
23,094
78,503
29,661
108,843
51,791
4,706
2,222,637

$

$

2026
2026 vs 2025 2nd Qtr Actual
Actual
Variance
% Variance
89,092
9.9%
985,362
23,532
33.7%
93,271
35,938
8.2%
472,973
8,296
4.1%
208,739
129,958
33,533
34.8%
80,671
9,113
12.7%
27,534
17.8%
182,103
25,799
2,705
11.7%
43,752
55.7%
122,255
27,366
(2,295)
-7.7%
119,124
10,281
9.4%
4,264
8.2%
56,055
(779)
-16.6%
3,927
2,507,603 $
387,847
18.30%

Sales tax by category is provided by TaxTools

City of University Place

7

Second Quarter 2026

Real Estate Excise Tax

Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) collections for the second quarter of 2026 totaled $785,426, exceeding budget
projections by 25.67% but marking an 8.20% increase compared to the $725,879 collected in Q2 of 2025.

REET
Second Quarter Monthly Comparison
January
February
March
April
May
June
Total

$

$

2023
Actual
60,789
70,351
103,564
99,813
126,778
125,775
587,070

Taxable Sales

$

69,889,300

MONTH

City of University Place

2024
Actual
333,046
83,902
136,006
118,318
128,606
181,600
981,479

$

$

$ 116,842,699

8

$

2025
Actual
65,656
105,256
112,511
106,300
142,193
193,963
725,879

$

86,414,130

$

$

2026
Actual
70,051
98,946
122,103
209,416
157,957
126,952
785,426

$

93,503,049

$

Second Quarter 2026

State-Shared Revenues

Total state-shared revenues exceed 2026 budget estimates by 4.63%.
Second Quarter Fuel Tax is below budget estimate by 2.30%. Fuel Tax is collected at the state level and is distributed
to cities based on percent of population as compared with the State.
Liquor-related revenues were lower than anticipated in the second quarter of 2026. Liquor Profits finished 0.53%
below budget, while Liquor Excise Tax revenues were 7.77% below projected levels.
Leasehold Excise Tax collections exceeded second-quarter budget estimates by 69.96%, reflecting stronger-thananticipated revenue from taxable lease agreements. Leasehold Excise Tax applies to properties owned by state or
local governments that are leased to private entities. Currently, the City has three tenants subject to this tax. Of
these, two tenants have received a non-profit exemption, reducing their tax liability. Additionally, the City holds two
cell tower leases, one of which qualifies for a tax exemption under RCW 82.29A as it is operated by an entity taxed
as a public utility.
Criminal Justice Sales Tax collections came in 7.57% above budget estimates, while other Criminal Justice funding
sources exceeded projections by 10.71%.

STATE SHARED REVENUES
2026
2023
2024
2025
Budget to Actual
CATEGORY
Actual
$ Variance % Variance
Actual
Actual
Actual
Total Budget 2nd Qtr Budget
267,750 $
133,875 $
133,163 $
(712)
-0.53%
Liquor Profits Tax
$
135,399 $
134,297 $
134,084 $
Liquor Excise Tax
131,200
121,294
114,520
238,323
119,162
109,906
(9,255)
-7.77%
Leashold Excise Tax
3,085
3,565
3,362
5,200
2,600
4,419
1,819
69.96%
Fuel Tax
350,584
334,465
328,184
702,271
351,136
343,069
(8,067)
-2.30%
City Assistance
46,940
47,470
65,940
78,440
39,220
68,458
29,238
74.55%
Local Crim Justice Sales Tax
403,520
411,269
426,333
846,683
423,342
455,389
32,048
7.57%
Criminal Justice Funding
67,926
73,534
76,650
147,896
73,948
81,865
7,917
10.71%
Total $ 1,138,655 $ 1,125,895 $ 1,149,072 $ 2,286,563 $ 1,143,282 $ 1,196,268 $
52,987
4.63%
% Change from prior year
-6.4%
-7.4%
0.9%
4.1%

City of University Place

9

Second Quarter 2026

Utility Tax

Overall, utility tax revenue is 13.62% above second quarter budget estimates. Natural gas taxes are 40.88% above
second quarter budget estimates. This will level out as gas use is impacted by the weather as there is higher use in
the winter months. Garbage is up 2.71%. Cable television taxes are 7.95% below estimates.
Cell phone tax revenues exceed budget estimates by 3.92%. Telephone tax is 8.75% below 2026 budget estimates.
Cable is 7.95% below budget estimates.
Utility Tax Revenues
2nd Quarter Collections

Electric
Gas
Garbage
Cable
Phone
Cellular
Sewer
Water
SWM
Total Revenue

2023
Actual
812,462
324,064
268,600
326,945
55,251
73,980
274,678
261,529
101,392
2,498,902

2024
Actual
821,977
285,013
280,248
292,089
48,845
73,943
287,274
281,760
107,529
2,478,678

2025
Actual
854,886
330,613
285,659
275,580
47,344
78,076
308,869
310,276
135,390
2,626,693

2026
Budget
2nd Qtr Budget
1,573,346
786,673
479,447
239,724
570,236
285,118
556,840
278,420
94,132
47,066
141,788
70,894
580,000
290,000
586,558
293,279
187,698
93,849
4,770,045
2,385,023

Actual
901,634
337,723
292,835
256,282
42,946
73,671
323,244
326,319
155,325
2,709,978

Budget to Actual
$ Variance
% Variance
114,961
14.61%
97,999
40.88%
7,717
2.71%
(22,138)
-7.95%
(4,120)
-8.75%
2,777
3.92%
33,244
11.46%
33,040
11.27%
61,476
65.51%
324,955
13.62%

Franchise Fees

Overall, franchise Fee revenue exceeds budget estimates by 9.65%. Cable is below budget estimates by 6.62%.
Franchise Fees
2nd Quarter Collections

Cable
Refuse
Water
Electric
Sewer
Total Revenue

City of University Place

2023
Actual
269,950
221,303
386,831
717,860
274,677
1,870,622

2024
Actual
240,914
232,161
414,989
741,512
287,273
1,916,849

2026
Budget
2nd Qtr Budget
225,454
450,908
459,045
229,523
791,644
395,822
1,429,747
714,874
580,000
290,000
3,711,344
1,855,672

2025
Actual
227,160
235,798
445,093
763,729
308,869
1,980,648

10

Actual
210,528
238,444
483,070
779,519
323,244
2,034,805

Budget to Actual
$ Variance
% Variance
(14,926)
-6.62%
8,922
3.89%
87,248
22.04%
64,645
9.04%
33,244
11.46%
179,133
9.65%

Second Quarter 2026

Transportation Benefit District (TBD) Fees
Second Quarter 2026 revenues of $236,513 are 3.1% below budget estimates.
Resolution 1054 was adopted by the City of University Place Council on Monday, October 7, 2024. The resolution
increases our TBD fee incrementally in $10 in 2025, $10 in 2027, and $10 in 2029. The first increase was effective
May 1, 2025.
Transportation Benefit District fees are collected to fund maintenance, preservation, and safety enhancements to
University Place's existing transportation network.

MONTH
January
February
March
April
May
June
Total

City of University Place

$

$

2023
Actual
20,427
17,365
20,418
19,211
19,893
19,502
116,815

$

$

2024
Actual
19,369
18,206
20,007
19,594
20,978
20,295
118,449

11

$

2025
Actual
21,184
16,697
21,012
27,181
35,640
32,742
154,456

$

2026
Actual
37,456
37,277
40,625
41,053
39,442
40,659
236,513

Second Quarter 2026

MISCELLANEOUS DATA
POPULATION

City of University Place

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

35,420

35,580

35,970

36,140

36,490

2022

2023

Source: State of Washington Office of Financial Management

TOTAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY PER $1,000 AV

City of University Place
County
State
State School Levy 2
Conservation Futures
Flood Control Zone
Port of Tacoma
Central PS Regional Transit
Pierce County Rural Library
Fire District #3 EMS
Fire District #3 M&O *
Fire District #3 Expense
UP School District - Bond
UP School District - Capital Projects
UP School District Enrichment - M&O

Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Excess (voted) Levy Rate
Regular Levy Rate
Excess (voted) Levy Rate
Excess (voted) Levy Rate
Excess (voted) Levy Rate

Total University Place Levy

2024

2025

2026

0.78
0.85
1.73
0.93
0.03
0.10
0.15
0.18
0.39
0.45
0.90
1.36
1.46
0.43
2.45
12.19

0.66
0.73
1.51
0.81
0.03
0.10
0.13
0.16
0.33
0.41
1.23
0.76
1.22
0.42
2.38
10.88

1.01
0.74
1.51
0.81
0.03
0.10
0.14
0.16
0.34
0.44
0.92
1.32
0.97
0.46
2.50
11.45

0.98
0.72
1.55
0.84
0.03
0.09
0.13
0.16
0.33
0.44
1.00
0.73
0.47
2.50
9.98

0.95
0.70
1.49
0.80
0.03
0.09
0.13
0.16
0.32
0.43
0.98
0.72
0.47
2.50
9.78

$ 4,609,967

$ 4,678,340

$ 6,947,095

$ 7,047,517

$ 7,153,466

* On November 5, 2024, voters approved Proposition 1 authorizing the imposition of benefit charges each year for six years, not to exceed an amount
equal to 60% of its operating budget and be prohibited from imposing an adiitional property tax under RCW 52.16.160.

OPERATING INDICATORS
General Government
Building Permits Issued
Police
Calls for Service
Part 1 Crimes*
DUI Arrests
Other Traffic Arrests
Fire**
Emergency Medical Responses
Fire Responses
Other

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

1,101

1,126

941

840

933

10,056
895
6
23
10,980

10,038
1,129
10
34
11,211

10,833
1,026
27
61
11,947

11,248
739
16
14
12,017

11,769
606
22
46
12,443

14,187
2,065
1,520

14,151
2,007
1,563

17,772

17,721

14,096
2,161
1,552
17,809

14,545
2,261
1,455
18,261

14,768
2,007
1,416
18,191

* Part 1 Crimes includes Violent Crime (Aggravated Assault, Murder, Rape, Robbery) and Property Crime (Arson,
Motor Vehicle Theft, Burglary and Theft)
** Reflects the total for all of West Pierce Fire.

City of University Place

12

Second Quarter 2026

Page left intentionally blank

City of University Place

14

Second Quarter 2026

Business of the City Council
City of University Place, WA
Proposed Council Action:
Authorize the City Manager to increase Purchase
Order No. 20260073 with Don Small & Sons Oil
Distributing Company by $13,224.00, including tax, to
cover fuel purchases resulting from increased fuel
costs.

Expenditure
Require: $13,224.00

Agenda No.:

7C

Department:

Public Works

Date:

October 19, 2026

Exhibits:
Approved by City Manager:
Approved by City Attorney:
Approved by Finance Director:

Amount
Budgeted: $101,000.00

__________
__________
__________

Appropriation
Required: $0.00

SUMMARY/POLICY ISSUES
The City Council is requested to authorize an increase to Purchase Order #20260073 with Don Small & Sons Oil
Distributing Company in the amount of $13,224.00. This increase is necessary to continue providing fuel for City vehicles
and equipment due to higher-than-anticipated fuel costs during 2026.
Fuel is required to support essential City operations, including public works, parks maintenance, code enforcement, and
other municipal services. Due to fluctuations in fuel pricing and increased operating costs, the remaining balance on the
purchase order is insufficient to meet anticipated fuel needs through the end of the year.
Funds for this purchase order increase are available within the approved 2026 budget and will ensure uninterrupted fuel
service for City operations.

BOARD OR COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
N/A

RECOMMENDATION/MOTION
MOVE TO:

Authorize the City Manager to increase Purchase Order No. 20260073 with Don Small & Sons Oil
Distributing Company by $13,224.00, including tax, to cover fuel purchases resulting from increased fuel
costs.

Memo
DATE:

October 19, 2026

TO:

City Council

FROM:

Lisa Petorak, Director of Administrative Services

SUBJECT:

City of University Place Hazard Mitigation Plan Adoption 2025-2030

Summary
The City of University Place’s 2025–2030 Hazard Mitigation Plan, Addendum to Pierce County’s
Region 5 plan, identifies natural and human caused hazards, evaluates impacts, and outlines
actions to protect lives, property, operations, natural resources, and economic stability.
Updated every five years, an adopted plan is required for eligibility for certain FEMA disaster
preparedness and recovery grants. Washington Emergency Management and FEMA have
completed preliminary reviews without requesting changes; following Council adoption, the
Resolution and Plan will be resubmitted for final approval.
Hazard Mitigation Regulations and Grant Eligibility
Although hazard mitigation was not formally established until the late 1990s, its roots trace
to the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, enacted in response to flooding caused by
Hurricane Betsy. The Act created the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which,
through later amendments, encouraged communities to adopt and enforce floodplain
ordinances and building codes that exceeded federal development requirements. Subsequent
federal regulations and amendments expanded the focus to pre-disaster assistance.
Federal hazard mitigation planning, and the formal use of hazard mitigation plans, emerged
around 1997 with Congress’s pilot program, Project Impact, which helped communities reduce
risks before disasters occurred. Building on that effort, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
made hazard mitigation plans central to mitigation planning and federal grant eligibility.
Today, several emergency preparedness and response grants require local governments to
adopt a plan before receiving federal funding.
Specifically, there are five FEMA grants that explicitly require an adopted hazard mitigation
plan prior to applying for and receiving funds. Those are: the Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program, the Public Assistance Grant Program, Building Resilience Infrastructure and
Communities Mitigation Grant Program (BRIC), the Fire Management Assistance Grant, and
the Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dam Grant Program. The most important grants
that concern communities such as University Place are the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program,
the Public Assistance Grant Program and BRIC.

The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program is focused on providing federal funding to communities
to rebuild in a way that reduces or mitigates future disaster losses. The Public Assistance
Grant Program helps governments during a disaster and post-disaster recovery. BRIC focuses
on infrastructure mitigation prior to a disaster or natural hazard.
Hazard Mitigation Planning Process
Beginning in 2024, Pierce County hosted several meetings including drop-in workshops with
various emergency partners. City staff, and its liaison through the West Pierce Emergency
Management Coalition (WPEMC) were active participants during this process and during Cityspecific individual consultations with County emergency management employees. Staff
reviewed demographic information, various hazard mitigation maps and the potential impacts
on surrounding areas, researched internal and external emergency planning documents,
informed Council of the process and sought plan feedback from the public.
Hazard Mitigation Plan Document
The City’s addendum is more than 200 pages and describes the FEMA-approved planning
process; the characteristics that make University Place unique; the City’s capabilities,
vulnerabilities, and potential hazard impacts; strategies to reduce those impacts; critical
infrastructure within City limits; and the City’s commitment to continually review, implement,
and improve the Plan. Although the Plan addresses the most commonly anticipated hazards,
it is not a comprehensive list of every event that could affect the City, its residents, or its
businesses. The Plan may be updated as the City responds to hazardous events and learns
from new experiences and those of other jurisdictions.
The Hazard Mitigation Plan is organized into seven main categories and those are discussed
in further detail below.
Process
The document and planning process is regulated largely by 44 CFR 201.6. As summarily
described above, under the planning process, federal code requires an open public
involvement in the process, an opportunity for local and regional agencies, subject matter
experts, and others to be involved, and the review of current plans, studies and other technical
information for incorporation into the Hazard Mitigation Plan. This section outlines the steps
University Place took and participated in to meet the federal requirements for this portion of
the Plan.
Jurisdictional Profile
The jurisdictional profile is the Plan’s least formulaic section, allowing each governing body to
highlight its community’s unique characteristics. Staff reviewed prior plans and other City
documents to summarize University Place’s history, including material from an earlier hazard
mitigation plan describing the Fraser Glaciation period that shaped the area’s geology and
topography. The profile also highlights milestones, including the City’s incorporation,
development of Chambers Bay and the Village at Chambers Bay, significant economic growth,
and construction of the Civic Building. Additional information includes census demographics,
the City’s economic history and current business mix, land use, and assessments of
commercial activity and property values.
Capability Identification
The capability assessment evaluates the City’s ability to reduce its vulnerability to hazards. It
has two components: an inventory of community programs and policies that support hazard
Page 2

mitigation, and an analysis of the City’s capacity to implement them. The assessment
identifies existing policies, regulations, programs, and practices that may increase or reduce
vulnerability. Measures that support mitigation are included in the mitigation strategies
section.
Risk Assessment
The risk assessment portrays the threats of various hazards, the vulnerabilities of University
Place in relation to the hazards, and the consequences of those impacts. Each hazard is
addressed as a threat and is identified and profiled. The vulnerabilities to and consequences
of a given hazard are addressed in the analysis. Vulnerability is analyzed in terms of exposure
of both population and infrastructure to each hazard.
Once the general exposure, population exposure, and infrastructure exposure are determined,
a consequences analysis is conducted for geological (earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides,
volcanic/lahars), meteorological (drought, flood, severe weather and wildland urban
interfaces fire hazards), and technological hazards (civil disturbances, energy emergencies,
hazardous materials, transportation accidents and epidemics/pandemics). The Hazard
Mitigation Plan then determines the likelihood and/or extent of impact within the City. For
example, a sizeable earthquake along any number of fault lines directly under Pierce County
would have major life, health, and safety impacts with an economic loss in the high millions
of dollars.
Mitigation Strategy
The mitigation strategy is the most important portion of the Plan and can be described as the
blueprint for reducing potential losses based on existing policies, authority, programs,
resources and ability to expand on and improve these tools. The mitigation strategy looks at
what an agency can do before an emergency to limit risk to lives or limit damage to
infrastructure, economic sustainability, and natural resources. These mitigating factors can
range from complex plans and expensive projects to easy and simple modifications that do
not require many resources. Mitigation strategies may include projects related to seismic
evaluations and structural and non-structural retrofits, tree maintenance, public education,
business recovery education, energy planning and more.
Below are tables highlighting new and continuing mitigation projects, along with examples of
completed projects. The tables are not exhaustive, and projects may be added, completed,
or modified over the next five years.

Page 3

Page 4

After the initial study session of October 5, the Day Island South Spit Road and staff review
of how to assist/remove barriers related to City-controlled costs were added to the Hazard
Mitigation Plan.
Infrastructure
This portion of the Plan details City-owned buildings and potential vulnerability ratings.
Maintenance
Maintenance describes the methodology for monitoring the Plan and its mitigation activities.
Formal review of this Plan is on a five-year calendar schedule. University Place is tentatively
scheduled to begin meeting once again with Pierce County Department of Emergency
Management staff around the year 2029. If adopted, this Plan will be active through 2030.

Health in All Policies

Staff evaluated the University Place Hazard Mitigation Plan using the Health in All Policies
analysis tool. Based on the matrix criteria, staff determined that the Plan’s purpose and
recommendations support community health needs and that no health-related amendments
are needed at this time.

Conclusion

Following pre-adoption review by the Washington State Emergency Management Division and
FEMA, the City Council is responsible for adopting the Plan. Upon adoption, the City will
resubmit the Plan and Council Resolution to both agencies for final approval. Because neither
agency requested changes during its preliminary review, final approval is anticipated. Once
approved, the City will be eligible for federal grants that require an adopted Hazard Mitigation
Plan.

Page 5

Business of the City Council
City of University Place, WA
Proposed Council Action:
Adopt a resolution approving the City of University Place
addendum to the Region 5 Hazard Mitigation Plan,
2025-2030 edition.

Agenda No.:

7D

Department:

Administrative Services

Date:

October 19, 2026

Exhibits:

Resolution
Hazard Mitigation Plan

Approved by City Manager:
Approved by City Attorney:
Approved by Finance Director:
Expenditure
Require: $0.00

Amount
Budgeted: $0.00

__________
__________
__________

Appropriation
Required: $0.00

SUMMARY/POLICY ISSUES
The purpose of hazard mitigation is to protect life and property, ensure continuity of operations, establish and/or
strengthen partnerships, protect and/or restore natural resources, increase public preparedness, and promote economic
sustainability. These factors are brought together in a living document that is the Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The Hazard Mitigation Plan is reviewed and updated every five years in accordance with federal laws governing disaster
response and funding for pre- and post-disaster activities. To be eligible to request and receive funding from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for disaster preparedness, response, and recovery, local governments must
adopt a hazard mitigation plan.
In 2024, the City began working closely with the County to develop its appendix to the Region 5 Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The City’s addendum addresses all FEMA-required elements of an approved plan. The Washington Emergency
Management Division and FEMA conducted preliminary reviews, requested no revisions, and granted preliminary
approval pending Council adoption. If adopted, the final Resolution and Hazard Mitigation Plan will be resubmitted to
FEMA for final approval, preserving the City’s eligibility for future federal emergency grant funding.

BOARD OR COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
N/A

RECOMMENDATION/MOTION
MOVE TO:

Adopt a resolution approving the City of University Place addendum to the Region 5 Hazard Mitigation
Plan, 2025-2030 edition.

RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING
THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE ADDENDUM TO THE REGION 5 HAZARD
MITIGATION PLAN, 2025-2030 EDITION
WHEREAS, the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires that for all disasters declared on
or after November 1, 2004, applicants for sub-grants following any disaster must have an approved Natural
Hazard Mitigation Plan in accordance with 44 CFR 201.6 prior to receipt of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
funding; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires that for Pre-Disaster Mitigation
program project funding on or after November 1, 2004, applicants must have an approved Natural Hazard
Mitigation Plan in accordance with 44 CFR 201.6 prior to receipt of project funding; and
WHEREAS, the All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update represents the commitment of the City of
University Place along with other surrounding government entities to reduce the risks from natural, manmade and technological hazards, serving as a guide for decision makers as they commit resources to
reducing the effects of hazards, and it is in the public interest to proceed with the planning process in a
timely manner; and
WHEREAS, the City of University Place has participated with the Pierce County Department of
Emergency Management in the development of the City’s All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, and
recognizes the economic loss, personal injury, and damage that can arise from these hazards; and
WHEREAS, reduction of these impacts can be achieved through a comprehensive coordinated
planning process which includes an updated risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities
proposed in the mitigation strategies to reduce losses and vulnerabilities, a five-year cycle for plan
maintenance, and documentation of formal adoption by the City of University Place; and
WHEREAS, the 2025-2030 Region 5 All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Edition has been completed and
approved by the State and the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and
WHEREAS, the City of University Place could risk not receiving future disaster funding if the AllHazard Mitigation Plan is not adopted; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PLACE, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The University Place Addendum to the Region 5 All-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2025-2030
Edition, are hereby adopted as set forth in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk.
Section 2. This Resolution and the plans adopted herein shall be in full force and effect upon
adoption and signatures hereon.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 19, 2026.

________________________________
Stan Flemming, Mayor

ATTEST:
_______________________________
Emelita J. Genetia, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Matthew S. Kaser, City Attorney

Section 1: Plan Process

Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

Plan Process Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
Plan Requirements – Requirement §201.6(a)(4).
(4) Multi-jurisdictional plans (e.g., watershed plans) may be accepted, as appropriate, as long as
each jurisdiction has participated in the process and has officially adopted the plan. State-wide
plans will not be accepted as multi-jurisdictional plans.
Planning Process – Requirement §201.6(b)(1) and §201.6(b)(2). The planning process must include:
(b) Planning process. An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an
effective plan. In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of
natural disasters, the planning process must include:
(1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and
prior to plan approval;
(2) An opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in
hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to regulate
development, as well as businesses, academia and other private and nonprofit interests
to be involved in the planning process; and
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(1): The plan must include the following:
(c) Plan content. The plan must include the following:
(1) Documentation of the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it
was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved.

PAGE 1-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 1: Plan Process
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE 1-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table of Contents
Plan Process Requirements ............................................................................................................ 1
Changes Since 2020 Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Plan ........................................................... 4
Plan Process .................................................................................................................................... 6
Planning Teams ............................................................................................................................... 8
Planning Team Meetings .............................................................................................................. 11
Community Engagement .............................................................................................................. 15
Endnotes ....................................................................................................................................... 16

PAGE 1-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Changes Since 2020 Pierce County
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Jurisdictional Annexes to the Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan (RHMP) include the
following changes detailed in this subsection that are documented as a result of a complete
review and update of the existing plan for the City of University Place.
The purpose for the changes is three-fold: 1) the Federal Law (Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), Title 44, Part 201.6) pertaining to Mitigation Planning has changed since the original Plan
was undertaken; 2) this Plan will be an Jurisdictional Annex to the 2025 comprehensive and
FEMA approved Pierce County RHMP and 3) the Local Mitigation Planning Requirements of the
Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 201.6 (d) (3) Plan Review states Plans must be reviewed, revised
if appropriate, and resubmitted for approval within five years in order to continue to be eligible
for relevant grant and disaster funding opportunities. This document when completed and
approved will become the City of University Place Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The City of University Place previously adopted the 2020 Region 5 Hazard Mitigation Plan, and
this Jurisdictional Annex of the 2025 Pierce County RHMP is an update of the 2020 Region 5
Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Change Matrix
Table 1-1 documents as summary of the planning process and methodology changes from the
2020 update of the Region 5 All Hazard Mitigation Plan to the 2025 update of the Pierce County
RHMP. A full change matrix comparing the two plan updates is located in the Pierce County
RHMP Base Plan, Section 1: Plan Process.

PAGE 1-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 1-1 Summary Change Matrix: Comparing the 2020 to 2025 Plan

Previous 2020 Plan

New in 2025
Section 1: Plan Process

The previous plan was named the 2020 Region 5
Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The previous plan had one primary planning process.

The current plan is named the 2025 Pierce County
Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The current plan has two planning processes.

Section 2: Profile
The previous Section 2: Profile analyzed the 2015 U.S.
Census Population data sets.

The current Section 2: Profile analyzes the 2020 U.S.
Census Population Characteristics and 2025 Office of
Financial Management data sets.

Section 3: Capability Identification
Each five-year hazard mitigation planning process
entailed all Jurisdictional Annexes reviewing, revising,
and potentially adding new capabilities.

Each five-year hazard mitigation planning process
entails all Jurisdictional Annexes reviewing, revising,
and potentially adding new capabilities.

Section 4: Risk Assessment
The current Section 4: Risk Assessment hazard list
consolidates similar hazards together to create a final
list of 14 hazards.

The previous Section 4: Risk Assessment hazard list
analyzed 21 hazards.

Section 5: Mitigation Strategy
Each five-year hazard mitigation planning process
entailed all Jurisdictional Annexes reviewing, revising,
and potentially adding new mitigation strategies.

Each five-year hazard mitigation planning process
entails all Jurisdictional Annexes reviewing, revising,
and potentially adding new mitigation strategies.

Section 6: Infrastructure
The previous Jurisdictional Annex Section 6:
Infrastructure format had an Infrastructure
Vulnerability – Hazard Summary Table and an
Infrastructure Vulnerability – Dependency Summary
Table.

The current Jurisdictional Annex Section 6:
Infrastructure removes the Infrastructure Vulnerability
– Hazard Summary and Infrastructure Vulnerability –
Dependency Summary Tables to refine formatting.

Section 7: Plan Maintenance
The previous Plan Maintenance and Approval Process
entailed a staggered review of the Pierce County
RHMP by Washington State Emergency Management
Division first and then by FEMA Region X.

The current Plan Maintenance and Approval Process
entails a concurrent review of the 2025 Pierce County
RHMP by Washington State Emergency Management
Division and FEMA Region X.

Appendices A, B, C, & D
The previous structure for Jurisdictional Annex
Appendices: Appendix A, B, C, D, E, and F.

The current structure for Jurisdictional Annex
Appendices: Appendix A, B, C, and D. The content
organization in each appendix also change in
comparison to the last plan.

PAGE 1-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Plan Process
The Pierce County Regional RHMP, Section 1: Plan Process is a discussion of the planning
process used to update the Pierce County RHMP, including how the process was prepared, who
aided in the process, and the public involvement. The plan update is developed around all
major components identified in 44 CFR 201.6, including: Plan Process, Profile, Capability
Identification, Risk Assessment, Mitigation Strategy, Infrastructure, and Plan Maintenance (see
Figure 1-1).
Figure 1-1 Jurisdictional Annex Organization

1

2

Plan Process

Profile

5
Mitigation
Strategy

3

4

Capability
Identification

Risk
Assessment

7

6
Infrastructure

Plan
Maintenance

Appendicies
A, B, C, & D

Public Involvement Process
Public participation is a key component to strategic planning processes. Resident participation
offers residents the chance to voice their ideas, interests, and opinions.
“Involving [partner]s who are not part of the core team in all stages of the
process will introduce the planning team to different points of view about the
needs of the community. It will also provide opportunities to educate the
public about hazard mitigation, the planning process, and findings, and could
be used to generate support for the mitigation plan.” 1
In order to accomplish this goal and to ensure that the updated Pierce County RHMP be
comprehensive, the planning groups in conjunction with PCDEM developed a public
participation process of three components:
1. A Pierce County RHMP Planning Team comprised of knowledgeable individual
representatives of Pierce County RHMP area and its hazards;
2. Hazard Meetings to target the specialized knowledge of individuals working with
populations or areas at risk from all hazards; and
PAGE 1-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

3. Public meetings to identify common concerns and ideas regarding hazard mitigation and
to discuss specific goals, objectives, and strategies of the mitigation plan.
This section discusses each of these components in further detail below with public
participation outlined in each. Integrating public participation into the development of the
Pierce County RHMP update has helped to ensure an accurate depiction of the Region’s risks,
vulnerabilities, and mitigation priorities.

PAGE 1-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Planning Teams
The Pierce County RHMP Planning Team brings together jurisdictional planning partners from a
wide variety of disciplines and geographic regions to plan together on how to protect
communities from natural and human-caused hazards. The Planning Team is comprised of all
jurisdictional planning partners participating in the planning process ranging from fire districts,
school districts, utility providers, higher education institutions, cities, towns, and other local
jurisdictions. Jurisdictions that either shared similar disciplines or were located in similar
geographic regions were grouped together during the planning process.

Planning Team: Planning Process #1
The Pierce County RHMP Planning Team was organized in September 2024. The individual
Pierce County Pierce County RHMP Team members understand the portion of Pierce County
containing their specific jurisdiction, including how residents, businesses, infrastructure, and
the environment may be affected by all hazard incidents. The members are experienced in past
and present mitigation activities and represent those entities through which many of the
mitigation strategies would be implemented. The Pierce County RHMP Planning Team guided
the update of the Pierce County RHMP, assisted in reviewing and updating goals and strategies,
identified partners, and shared local expertise to create a more comprehensive plan. The City of
University Place was comprised of the Cities and Towns Planning Group (Table 1-2) and the
Southwest Regional Planning Group (Table 1-3).
Table 1-2 Planning Teams – Discipline Cities and Towns Group

Name

Title

Jurisdiction or Department

Raejean Kreel
Eric Skogen
Barb Kincaid
Bryan Moore
Larry Creekmore
Mickey Gillie
Jason Youngman
Jeremy Metzler
Sandi Phillips
Josh Kubitza
David Claridge
Doug Newman

Emergency Manager
Fire Chief/Emergency Manager
Director of Community Development
Chief of Police
Assistant Fire Chief
Fire Chief
Chief of Police
Community Development Director
Emergency Management Coordinator
Planning Manager
Police Chief
Assistant Police Chief

Tyler Bemis

Public Works Director

Victor Celis

Chief of Police

City of Bonney Lake
City of Buckley
City of DuPont
City of DuPont
City of DuPont
City of DuPont
City of Edgewood
City of Edgewood
City of Edgewood
City of Edgewood
City of Fife
City of Fife
City of Fircrest, Public Works
Department
City of Fircrest, Police Department

PAGE 1-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Name

Title

Jurisdiction or Department

Dawn Masko
Eric Baker
Serena Rotondo
Tiffany Speir
Patrick Smith
Jeff Alwine
Trisha Summers
Angelie Stahlnecker
Timothy Bauer
Kirstin Hofmann
Pat Donovan
Paul Antista
Ryan Fuller

City of Fircrest, Administration
City of Gig Harbor
City of Lakewood
City of Lakewood
City of Lakewood
City of Lakewood
City of Milton
City of Milton
City of Orting
City of Puyallup
City of Puyallup
City of Roy
City of Roy

Doug Beagle
Robert Wright

City Manager
Community Development Director
Emergency Management Coordinator
Planning Director
Chief of Police
Police Captain
City Clerk/ HR Manager
Planning Manager
Emergency Management Coordinator
Emergency Manager
Project Specialist
City of Roy Police Chief
Public Works Director
Emergency Management and Safety
Coordinator
Development Services Director
Engineering Specialist

Tieka Adeogun

Chief Emergency Management Officer

Arianna Topbjerg

Emergency Analyst

Lisa Petorak

Director of Administrative Services

Serena Rotondo

Emergency Management Coordinator

Eric Skogen
Nick Moore
Eric Phillips
Terry Berry
Emily Terrell
Tom Yabe
Marie Wellock

Fire Chief (Buckley)
Town Planner
Town Administrator
Clerk-Treasurer
Town Planner
Police Chief
Town Clerk

Evan Brazitis

City of Sumner
City of Sumner
City of Sumner
City of Tacoma / Tacoma Fire
Department
City of Tacoma / Tacoma Fire
Department
City of University Place
City of University Place / City of
Lakewood / Town of Steilacoom
Town of Carbonado
Town of Eatonville
Town of Eatonville
Town of South Prairie
Town of South Prairie
Town of Steilacoom
Town of Wilkeson

Table 1-3 Planning Teams – Southwest Region Group

Name

Title

Jurisdiction or Department

Barb Kincaid
Bryan Moore
Larry Creekmore
Mickey Gillie
Serena Rotondo
Jeff Alwine

Director Community Development
Chief of Police
Assistant Fire Chief
Fire Chief
Emergency Management Coordinator
Assistant Police Chief

City of DuPont
City of DuPont
City of DuPont
City of DuPont
City of Lakewood
City of Lakewood

PAGE 1-9
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Name

Title

Jurisdiction or Department

Tiffany Speir
Patrick Smith
Tom Yabe
John Ecklund
Lisa Petorak
Hallie McCurdy
J Wiggins
Arron Reynolds
Mona Planesi
Susanne Beauchaine

Planning Director
Chief of Police
Police Chief
Director of Public Works
Director of Administrative Services
Deputy Chief
Fire Chief
Division Chief
Risk Manager
Executive Director for Human Resources

Torey Heidelberg
John DeVore
Kelly Butt
Don Stabley
Alley Reyes
Linda Horey

Preparedness/Safety Coordinator
General Manager
Operations Superintendent
Water Supply Manager
Project Engineer
Emergency Management Program
Specialist
Maintenance Superintendent
Emergency Management Administrator

City of Lakewood
City of Lakewood
Town of Steilacoom
City of University Place
City of University Place
West Pierce Fire & Rescue
Anderson Island Fire & Rescue
Anderson Island Fire & Rescue
Clover Park School District
Steilacoom Historical School
District
University Place School District
Lakeview Light & Power Co.
Lakeview Light & Power Co.
Lakewood Water District
Lakewood Water District
Western State Hospital

John Cammon
Rodney Chandler

Riviera Community Club
Pierce Transit

Planning Team: Planning Process #2
The Pierce County RHMP Planning Team for Planning Process #2 was organized in January of
2026. The individual Pierce County RHMP jurisdictions focused on the portion of Pierce County
containing their jurisdiction, including how residents, businesses, infrastructure, and the
environment may be affected by local natural and human-caused hazards. The Pierce County
RHMP Planning Team guided the update of the Pierce County RHMP, assisted in reviewing and
updating goals and strategies, identified planning partners, and shared local expertise to create
a more comprehensive plan. The City of University Place was not a part of Planning Process #2.
For more information on Planning Process #2, see the Pierce County RHMP Base Plan, Section 1:
Plan Process.

PAGE 1-10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Planning Team Meetings
The Pierce County RHMP Planning Team meetings are a critical part of the planning process
that facilitate bringing similar jurisdictions together to plan together on how to protect
communities from natural and human-caused hazards.

Planning Team Meetings: Planning Process #1
The Pierce County RHMP Planning Team held five planning meetings for each of the Discipline
Planning Groups (Table 1-4 and Figure 1-2), and five Regional Planning Group meetings (Table
1-5 and Figure 1-3). The Discipline Planning Groups consist of the Cities and Towns Group, Fire
Group, School Group, Special Purpose Group, Utility Group, Medical Group and Unincorporated
Pierce County Group. There was a total of fifty meetings from September 2024 to June 2025
between all Discipline and Regional Planning Groups. Additional working group drop-in
workshops were provided for jurisdictions to continue to work on and update their plans. Two
“drop-in” workshops were provided each month from January through June alternating
between morning and afternoons to accommodate work schedules.
The Regional Planning Groups consist of five geographical areas in Pierce County: West Group
(all of Gig Harbor, Key Peninsula, Herron Island, Fox Island and Raft Island), Southwest Group
(Lakewood, Anderson Island, DuPont, Steilacoom), Central Group (Puyallup, Graham,
Eatonville), Northeast Group (Buckley, Carbonado, Bonney Lake, Wilkeson, Orting), North
Group (Tacoma, Fife, Edgewood, Milton, Sumner). The Regional Planning Groups were
developed based on geographic location and the commonality of hazards shared and continued
with this update. This provides for better community planning, relationship building, and
collaboration of mitigation strategies ultimately leading to community resiliency.
Figure 1-2 Planning Process #1: Discipline Cities and Towns Group Planning Meetings

Meeting #1

Meeting #3

Meeting #5

• September 9, 2024

• November 18, 2024

• January 13, 2025

Meeting #9

Meeting #7

• May 12, 2025

• March 10, 2025

PAGE 1-11
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Pierce County RHMP Planning Team members Debbie Bailey, Monique Guerra, Jessica Hogan,
and Michelle Price conducted a series of Discipline Planning Group Meetings during the
planning process.
Table 1-4 Discipline Planning Group Meetings

Meeting #1 – Cities and Towns: PCDEM Carbon Room – September 9, 2024
Debbie Bailey, Jessica Hogan, and Michelle Price conducted the meeting. The following items were
discussed: introduction of Pierce County RHMP Planning Team members, overview of the regional
hazard mitigation plan update, defining the planning requirements, how to establish the in-kind
match, benefits of developing a plan, defining the planning process, establishing the planning team
meetings, elected official meetings and public comment meetings, joint planning requirements, and
defining next steps. This meeting focused on continuing review of Section 2: Profile. There was also an
introduction to begin thinking about mitigation strategies to include a review of what strategies from
their original plan were still applicable.

Meeting #3 – Cities and Towns: PCDEM Carbon Room – November 18, 2024
Debbie Bailey and Michelle Price conducted the meeting. Section 2: Profile, Section 3: Capability
Identification, and Section 5: Mitigation Strategy were reviewed. Progress was made on the in-kind
match sheets and pre-authorization approval from jurisdictions’ governing bodies. Potential dates for
an Equity Seminar were brought up but details were to be determined. Lastly, progress with outreach
events for their mitigation plans were discussed. The team discussed scheduling with Thanksgiving
approaching and the upcoming holiday season.

Meeting #5 – Cities and Towns: PCDEM Carbon Room – January 13, 2025
Debbie Bailey and Michelle Price conducted the meeting and reviewed Section 2: Profile, Section 3:
Capability Identification, and Section 5: Mitigation Strategy to see how everyone was coming along
with their update process. A reminder was provided for those who had not turned in their in-kind
match sheet, as well as for those who had not completed the governing body pre-approval
requirement yet. Section 4: Risk-Assessment was reviewed at length and consideration for the new
requirements, including climate change and underserved populations, was explained. Lastly, Greta
Holmstrom with Pierce County Surface Water Management discussed flooding-related issues.

Meeting #7 – Cities and Towns: PCDEM Carbon Room – March 10, 2025
Michelle Price conducted the meeting and went over Section 5: Mitigation Strategies The meeting
started with review of previous sections. Details on how to come up with mitigation strategies were
covered at length. Initial discussion was on the biggest hazards and concerns for each City and Town
present. Then, the new requirements were covered, especially the impacts of climate change. The
requirement to have each identified hazard covered by a mitigation strategy was covered. Lastly, the
requirement to prioritize each strategy was discussed.

PAGE 1-12
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Meeting #9 – Cities and Towns: PCDEM Carbon Room – May 12, 2025
Michelle Price and Jessica Hogan held the meeting with a virtual option for those who couldn’t attend
in person. The review of previous sections occurred, with the introduction of Section 7: Plan
Maintenance. Participants were shown the paragraph they needed to update. Like the previous
meeting, a reminder for the in-kind match sheet, pre-authorization documentation, and public
outreach documentation was provided. Follow up on the Hazard Mitigation Forum was given.
Discussion about upcoming meeting schedules was covered.

Pierce County RHMP Planning Team members Debbie Bailey, Monique Guerra, Jessica Hogan,
and Michelle Price conducted a series of Regional Planning Group Meetings during the planning
process (see Figure 1-3 below and Table 1-5 below).
Figure 1-3 Planning Process #1: Southwest Region Group Meeting Timeline

Meeting #2

Meeting #4

Meeting #6

• October 14, 2024

• December 9, 2024

• February 10, 2025

Meeting #10

Meeting #8

• June 9, 2025

• April 14, 2025

Table 1-5 Southwest Region Planning Meetings

Meeting #2 – Southwest Regional Group: PCDEM Carbon Room – October 14, 2024
Debbie Bailey, Michelle Price and Jessica Hogan conducted the meeting. The following items were
discussed: introduction of the Pierce County RHMP Planning Team as this was the first Regional
Planning Group meeting and there were new members present. Reviewed items presented at the
previous meeting: Defining the Planning Requirements, Defining the Process, Establishing the Pierce
County RHMP Planning Team Meetings, Elected Official Meetings and Public Comment Meetings, and
explaining the next steps. This meeting focused on continuing review of Section 2: Profile. The
demographic analysis was discussed, as well as any changes in jurisdictional boundaries. A review of
the in-kind match sheet and due dates for match sheets was given as well. Everyone was reminded to
set up their Elected Official meetings.

PAGE 1-13
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Meeting #4 – Southwest Regional Group: PCDEM Carbon Room – December 9, 2024
Debbie Bailey and Michelle Price reviewed Section 2: Profile, Section 3: Capability Identification,
Section 4: Risk Assessment, and Section 5: Mitigation Strategy to see how everyone was coming along
with their update process. A reminder was provided for those who had not turned in their in-kind
match sheet, as well as for those who had not completed the governing body pre-approval
requirement yet. Section 4: Risk-Assessment was reviewed at length and consideration for the new
requirements, including climate change and underserved populations, was explained. Lastly, Greta
Holmstrom with Pierce County Surface Water Management was present to discuss flooding issues.

Meeting #6 – Southwest Regional Group: PCDEM Carbon Room – February 10, 2024
Michelle Price conducted the meeting. The review of previous sections occurred, with the
introduction of Section 6: Infrastructure, Section 7: Plan Maintenance, and Section 5: Mitigation
Strategies. Like the previous meeting, a reminder for the in-kind match sheet, pre-authorization
documentation, and public outreach documentation was provided. Greta Holmstrom with Pierce
County Surface Water Management went over specific flood hazards for the Regional Planning Group.
The group also discussed the potential for “office hours” and one on one help.

Meeting #8 – Southwest Regional Group: PCDEM Carbon Room – April 14, 2024
Michelle Price and Jessica Hogan held the meeting with a virtual option for those who couldn’t attend
in person. The review of previous sections occurred, with the introduction of Section 6: Infrastructure.
Participants were taught about the section structure, rating system how to fill out the detailed tables.
Like the previous meeting, a reminder for the in-kind match sheet, pre-authorization documentation,
and public outreach documentation was provided. Follow up on the Hazard Mitigation Forum was
given.

Meeting #10 – Southwest Regional Group: PCDEM Carbon Room – June 9, 2024
The final Regional Planning Group meeting was conducted by Michelle Price, Jessica Hogan and
Monique Guerra. All sections of the plan were discussed and reviewed to ensure participants’
questions were answered. Like the previous meeting, a reminder for any last-minute documentation
was provided. Participants were informed that in the coming months, PCDEM would be hosting two
“workshops” a month where jurisdictions could get help with their plan on an individual basis to
refine the work that participants have done thus far and craft it into a well-rounded and
comprehensive Pierce County RHMP.

PAGE 1-14
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Community Engagement
Community engagement is critical to the hazard mitigation planning process. Communities
should be educated on their local hazard risks, what mitigation strategies can reduce these risks
in the future, and what their local jurisdictions are currently doing to reduce those risks.
Communities should also guide the hazard mitigation strategy solutions that reduce local risk to
hazards.

Public Comment and Outreach
Table 1-6 Public Comment and Outreach

Date

Location

October 19, 2024
October 30, 2024
January 16, 2025
March 13, 2025
June 26, 2025

Fall Safety Day
University Place Headlines
Public Safety Advisory Committee
Parks Commission
Economic Development Advisory Committee

Elected Officials Meetings
On December 3, 2024, Javier Figueroa, Mayor of University Place formally acknowledged the
City of University Place to participate in the 2025-2030 update of their Hazard Mitigation Plan in
a letter. Please see Appendix D for the official letter to participate.
The City of University Place Jurisdictional Annex to the Pierce County Regional Hazard
Mitigation Plan was approved by the University Place City Council on [Month XX, 2026].

PAGE 1-15
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Endnotes
FEMA. (2002, September). Getting Started: Building Support for Mitigation Planning, FEMA 386-1, page 3-1. State
and Local Mitigation Planning How-To-Guide.
1

PAGE 1-16
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 2: Profile

Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Profile Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
No Code of Federal Regulations Requirements in this Section.

PAGE 2-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 2: Profile
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE 2-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table of Contents
Mission Statement .......................................................................................................................... 4
Services Summary ........................................................................................................................... 5
Geo-Political Summary.................................................................................................................... 6
Population Summary ...................................................................................................................... 8
Infrastructure Summary.................................................................................................................. 9
Economy Summary ....................................................................................................................... 11
Endnotes ....................................................................................................................................... 22

PAGE 2-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Mission Statement
University Place is a safe, attractive city that provides a supportive environment for all
individuals to work, play, obtain an education, and raise families. Children and youth are
nurtured and encouraged to develop into competent, contributing individuals in a changing
world. The physical and mental well-being and health of all individuals is valued. Violence is not
tolerated. A cooperative community spirit and respect for each other – our commonalities and
differences – foster a diverse cultural, spiritual, and ethnic life and prepares people for future
challenges.

PAGE 2-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Services Summary
The City of University Place was incorporated in August of 1995. The City provides the following
services through their own capabilities (see Table 2-1).
Table 2 - 1 City of University Place Services 1

City of University Place Services
Service

Y/N

Mayor/City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
City Treasurer
Sheriff or Police

Yes
Yes
Yes

Contract

Parks Commissioners

Yes

City Council
License and Tax Fees
Non-Polluting Power Generation
Hydroelectric Resources
Radio Communications
Streets
Wastewater Treatment
Water Utility
Public Transportation Systems
Residential Care Facilities
Childcare Facilities

Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No

Service

Y/N

Municipal Airport
No
Municipal Court
Yes
Public Works/Improvements
Yes
Comprehensive Planning
Yes
Parking Meter Revenue
Yes
Construction and Operation of Boat
No
Harbors, Marinas, Docks, etc.
Issue Bonds and Levies of General Tax
Yes
Fire Department/EMS
No
Parking, Off-street Facilities
Yes
Sanitary Landfill/Refuse Service
Franchise
Sidewalks
Yes
Storm Drains
Yes
Streets/Alleys
Yes
Parks and Parkways
Yes
Water Pollution Abatement
Yes
Local Improvement Districts
No

PAGE 2-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Geo-Political Summary
The City of University Place is an incorporated jurisdiction in western Pierce County,
Washington, encompassing approximately 7.03 square miles with elevations ranging from sea
level along the Puget Sound shoreline to roughly 400 feet inland. The city lies within the
Chamber Clover Watershed and includes influence local stormwater management, shoreline
conditions, and environmental risk considerations. University Place shares borders with
Fircrest, Tacoma, Lakewood, and Steilacoom, and coordinates closely with these neighboring
jurisdictions and unincorporated Pierce County on planning, infrastructure, and emergency
management mattes. Within its municipal boundaries, the City of University Place serves as the
primary land use authority, while surrounding jurisdictions retain land use control in adjacent
areas that influence shared watershed and transportations systems. 2

PAGE 2-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Map 2-1 Base Map

PAGE 2-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Population Summary
Demographics
Table 2-2 Comparing Population and Population Density: 2020 and 2025 3 4

2020
Population

Jurisdiction
City of
University
Place
Pierce County

2020
Population
2025
Density
Population
(people/sq mi)

2025
Population
Density
(people/sq mi)

Percent
Change in
Population:
2020 to 2025

23,551

2,823

24,001

2,877

1.91%

920,393

509

959,900

531

4.29%

Special Populations
Table 2-3 65-Years-Old and Older Populations and Under 18-Year-Old Populations as of 2025 5 6

Jurisdiction

2025 65+ Years
Old Population

City of University Place
Pierce County

4,838
134,791

Mean Percent
Mean Percent
2025 <18 Years
of 65+ Years
of <18 Years
Old Population
Old Population
Old Population
20.38%
15.00%

4,960
211,764

20.86%
22.65%

Demographic Analysis
The largest growth has been the result of residential development. There is a limited ability for
the city to expand its population base. University Place’s Urban Growth Area extends only to
the City boundaries. Since it is bordered almost totally by Tacoma, Fircrest, Lakewood and
Steilacoom there is essentially no ability to expand geographically.

PAGE 2-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Infrastructure Summary
General
Table 2-4 Parcel Summary: Land Value and Improved Value 7

Jurisdiction
City of
University
Place
Pierce
County

Land Value

Average
Land Value

Improved Value

Average
Improved
Value

10,886

$3,760,729,200

$345,465

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

339,311

$102,871,224,678

$303,177

$128,956,421,596

$380,054

Number of
Parcels

Table 2-5 Assessed Land Value (Land Value and Improved Value Combined) and Taxable Value 8

Jurisdiction

Total Assessed Value

Average Assessed
Value (per parcel)

Taxable Value

City of University Place
Pierce County

$8,069,450,500
$231,827,646,274

$741,269
$683,231

$7,192,634,232
$203,047,709,149

Table 2-6 Estimated Housing Density 9 and How the Number of Housing Units Built Aligns with Critical Building
Code Updates (The 2000 International Building Code (IBC), the 2009 IBD Update, and the IBC 2012 Update) 10

Jurisdiction

Estimated
Housing
Number of
Density (units
Housing
per sq mi)
Units in 2020

City of
University
Place

14,120

1692.74

Pierce
County

359,489

194.38

Average Year Built
(housing units)
1980 or Earlier: 7,610
1980 – 1999: 4,438
2000 – 2009: 1,512
2010 – 2013: 299
2014 – 2020: 261
1980 or Earlier: 156,895
1980 – 1999: 110,149
2000 – 2009: 56,126
2010 – 2013: 13,467
2014 – 2020: 14,709

Average Year Built %
(housing units)
1980 or Earlier: 54%
1980 – 1999: 31%
2000 – 2009: 11%
2010 – 2013: 2%
2014 – 2020: 2%
1980 or Earlier: 45%
1980 – 1999: 31%
2000 – 2009: 16%
2010 – 2013: 4%
2014 – 2020: 4%

PAGE 2-9
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Jurisdiction Infrastructure
Table 2-7 shows an overview of infrastructure owned by the City of University Place. The
infrastructure is categorized according to the infrastructure sectors as designated by the
Department of Homeland Security. This table is intended as a summary only.

Transportation

Water

Power

Government

Commercial

121

Telecommunications

Total
Infrastructure

Emergency Services

Table 2 - 2 Owned infrastructure for the City of University Place 11

0

0

0

0

0

121

0

Total Value ($)

$29,150,200

PAGE 2-10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Economy Summary
Table 2-3 Fiscal Summary 12

Jurisdiction

Operating
Costs
(per month)

Operating
Budgeted
Revenues

Operating
Budgeted
Expenditures

Fund Balance
as % of
Operating
Cost

Avg Fund
Balance
(5 yrs)

City of
University
Place

2,362,042

43,489,473

28,344,498

53.43%

16,159,677

Economic Analysis
Historically the economic mainstay of University Place has been comprised of a mixture of small
business. There are no large industrial areas. The closest thing to large industry was the gravel
mining operation run by Glacier Northwest that went on along the southwestern coast of the
community. The land it was on was leased to it by the County and it finally closed its doors in
the summer of 2003.
There is no airport inside University Place. The closest, Tacoma Narrows Airport, lies across the
Tacoma Narrows on the Kitsap Peninsula. In addition, it is eight miles from the Port of Tacoma.
Neither of the railroads, Burlington Northern or Union Pacific, make stops in University Place.
While tracks run along the coast on the western boundary of the City, they transport containers
and general freight through the City without stopping. Passenger train service is the same,
traveling along the edge of the City and stopping in Tacoma to the east. While the coast makes
up a large portion of the University Place boundary, there are no port facilities or ferry
terminals and only one small marina by Day Island. All goods must then be brought in by truck
from distribution centers located elsewhere.
Table 2 - 4 2018 Top 10 Major Employers 13

2018 Top Ten Major Employers
U.P. School District
CHI Franciscan Health
Fred Meyer Stores *
West Pierce Fire and Rescue
Whole Foods
Pierce County Government
Charles Wright Academy

530 employees
335 employees
259 employees
185 employees
165 employees
153 employees
143 employees
PAGE 2-11

CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

2018 Top Ten Major Employers
Kemper Sports
University Place Care Center**
Safeway

126 employees
157 employees
88 employees

Early lumbering initially cleared much of the land and while homesteading went on and
eventually many homes were built, it was not until incorporation that there be began to be
more of an emphasis on business development. Since incorporation, steady growth in
urbanization has occurred in the heart of the City, especially along Bridgeport Way. In 2017,
Council adopted the University Place Regional Growth Center Subarea Plan thereby creating a
465-acre commercial, multi-family and mixed-use area within the center of the City. The
adoption of the plan will bolster an already growing economic core which houses both national
and local boutique retail outlets
Today major retail, healthcare, government, and the school district employ the majority of
those who work in University Place. The University Place School District, CHI Franciscan Health,
and Fred Meyer are the largest employers with 530, 335, and 259 employees respectively.
Taxable retail sales were $349.96 million in 2018. The business economy is distributed with
retail trade forming 40.6%, contracting 18.4%, services19.6%, transportation and utilities 6.1%,
wholesale trade 4.0%, finance, insurance, and real estate 3.3%, manufacturing 1.5%,
government 1.6%, and other 4.8%. 14
Economically the residents of University Place closely mirror the trends found in both Pierce
County and the State. Those living at or below the poverty line have seen an increase since
2000. University Place's percentage of 11.3% of the population at or below poverty compares
to Pierce County at 12.2% and Washington State with 12.2 %. The 2017 American Community
Survey shows the median value of housing to be $319,900. This is over an 80% increase from
the 2000 census. The Puget Sound region far outpaced the national average in home sale prices
after the Great Recession.
Table 2-5 Income: 2017 Census Comparison of University Place with Pierce County and Washington State 15

2017 Census Comparison of University Place with Pierce County and Washington State

Median Household Income
Median Family Income
Median Per Capita Income

University Place
2017
$64,883
$82,476
$35,257

Pierce County
2017
$63,881
$76,671
$31,157

Washington State
2017
$66,174
$80,233
$34,869

PAGE 2-12
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

The issue of affordable housing and the continued stasis of low interest rates helped fuel the
phenomenon increasing housing costs in the greater Seattle area. While the market shows signs
of stabilization, there is a continued demand for affordable housing that may or may not be
wholly met by current construction rates. The 2018 assessed value for the City is $3.8 billion.16
The economic core of the City lies along Bridgeport Way and development will continue to
expand in that area. A new City Hall and recently added Fire Station act to anchor the area as a
developing core.

Land Use
University Place currently has both developed and undeveloped land creating just over 120
acres. These can be seen in Table 2-11 Park Lands in University Place. University Place is now
built out at urban density. Any growth the City expects to have from this point forward will be
through infill development.
Table 2-6 Park Lands in University Place

Park Lands in University Place
Property

Acres

Property

Acres

Adrianna Hess Wetland Park
Brookridge Trail Easement
Brookside Park
Chambers Crest Wildlife Habitat
Cirque/ Bridgeport Park
Colegate Park
Colegate Play Area
Conservation Park
Creekside Park
Curran Apple Orchard
Day Island SWM Open Space

2
1.5
2.6
7.5
27
12
1
1.5
15
7.3
2.5

Homestead Park
Kobayashi Park
Leach Creek Conservation Park
Paradise Pond Park
Pemberton Creek Open Space
Riconosciuto Park
Senior Center
Sunset Terrace Park
UPP Play Area
Woodside Pond Nature Park
TOTAL

5.5
5.5
13
9.5
5.0
5.0
0.5
2.25
1
3.59
125.24

PAGE 2-13
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 2-7 University Place Land Use Designations and Implementing Zones

Land Use Designations

Implementing Zones

Single Family Residential (R1)

Residential 1 R1

Two Family Residential (R2)

Residential 1 R2

Multi-Family (MF)

Multi-Family Residential MF

Mixed Use–Office (MU-O)

Mixed Use–Office MU-O

Provides for primarily single-family
neighborhoods. Enhances and protects the
character of single-family neighborhoods by
disallowing inappropriate uses, limiting traffic
impacts, requiring design standards, preserving
and protecting the environment and providing
recreational facilities. Allows densities ranging
from 4 to 6 dwelling units per acre.
Provides for a mix of housing types and densities
while maintaining healthy residential
neighborhoods. Enhances and protects the
character of neighborhoods by disallowing
inappropriate uses, limiting traffic impacts,
requiring design standards, preserving and
protecting the environment and providing
recreational facilities. Allows densities ranging
from 6 to 8 dwelling units per acre.
Provides for higher density residential
development along major arterials and transit
routes, close to shopping, public facilities and
services. Allows densities ranging from 10 to 12
dwelling units per acre.
Serves as a transition zone providing separation
between more intense commercial activities and
residential areas and between the Neighborhood
Commercial and Town Center land use
designations. Uses include community and
cultural services, administrative government
services, minor utility facilities, multi-family and
single-family housing. Allows densities ranging
from 10 to 12 dwelling units per acre.

Provides for primarily single-family
neighborhoods. Enhances and protects the
character of single-family neighborhoods by
disallowing inappropriate uses, limiting traffic
impacts, requiring design standards, preserving
and protecting the environment and providing
recreational facilities. Allows densities ranging
from 4 to 6 dwelling units per acre.
Provides for a mix of housing types and densities
while maintaining healthy residential
neighborhoods. Enhances and protects the
character of neighborhoods by disallowing
inappropriate uses, limiting traffic impacts,
requiring design standards, preserving and
protecting the environment and providing
recreational facilities. Allows densities ranging
from 6 to 8 dwelling units per acre.
Provides for higher density residential
development along major arterials and transit
routes, close to shopping, public facilities and
services. Allows densities ranging from 10 to 12
dwelling units per acre.
Serves as a transition zone providing separation
between more intense commercial activities and
residential areas and between the Neighborhood
Commercial and Town Center land use
designations. Uses include community and
cultural services, administrative government
services, minor utility facilities, multi-family and
single-family housing. Allows densities ranging
from 10 to 12 dwelling units per acre.

PAGE 2-14
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Land Use Designations

Implementing Zones

Mixed Use (MU)

Mixed Use MU

Neighborhood Commercial (NC)

Neighborhood Commercial NC

Provides areas for compatible residential and
commercial uses along major arterial streets.
Serves as a transition between the more intense
Town Center zone and Single-Family Residential
zone. Encourages a mix of retail, personal
services, offices and residential use within
developments. Allows densities ranging from 10
to 12 dwelling units per acre.

Provides areas for compatible residential and
commercial uses along major arterial streets.
Serves as a transition between the more intense
Town Center zone and Single-Family Residential
zone. Encourages a mix of retail, personal
services, offices and residential use within
developments. Allows densities ranging from 10
to 12 dwelling units per acre.

Provides for small compact centers with a mix of
neighborhood scale retail shopping, services,
banks, professional offices, public parks,
community and cultural services, government
and safety services that serve the daily needs of
local residents and businesses. Single-family
dwellings are permitted.

Provides for small compact centers with a mix of
neighborhood scale retail shopping, services,
banks, professional offices, public parks,
community and cultural services, government
and safety services that serve the daily needs of
local residents and businesses. Single-family
dwellings are permitted.

Town Center (TC)

Town Center TC

Commercial (C)

Commercial C

Serves as a focal point for the city and provides a
sense of community and civic pride. Encourages
pedestrian oriented development and
discourages drive through establishments.
Provides area for a mix of public facilities and
services, retail stores personal services,
professional offices, restaurants, entertainment
and other mixed uses. Allows densities ranging
from l0 to 12 dwelling units per acre.
Allows concentrated commercial development in
locations which best serve the community and
protect existing residential areas. This
designation is primarily auto oriented with
customers drawn from more than just adjacent
neighborhoods but encourages pedestrian
friendly development.

Serves as a focal point for the city and provides a
sense of community and civic pride. Encourages
pedestrian oriented development and
discourages drive through establishments.
Provides area for a mix of public facilities and
services, retail stores personal services,
professional offices, restaurants, entertainment
and other mixed uses. Allows densities ranging
from l0 to 12 dwelling units per acre.
Allows concentrated commercial development in
locations which best serve the community and
protect existing residential areas. This
designation is primarily auto oriented with
customers drawn from more than just adjacent
neighborhoods but encourages pedestrian
friendly development.

PAGE 2-15
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Land Use Designations

Implementing Zones

Light Industrial-Business Park (IB)

Light Industrial-Business Park IB

Public Facility (PF)

Public Facility PF

Encourages clean light industrial and business
park uses in appropriate location. Provides the
opportunity for local employment by attracting a
variety of businesses.
Includes property currently owned or operated
by a public entity including fire stations, public
schools and parks.

Encourages clean light industrial and business
park uses in appropriate location. Provides the
opportunity for local employment by attracting a
variety of businesses.
Includes property currently owned or operated
by a public entity including fire stations, public
schools and parks.

PAGE 2-16
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

The Figure 2-1 gives an overview of the land use in the City. At this time visually, there is little
undeveloped space left within the City boundaries.
Figure 2-1 University Place Land Use Intensity Map 17

City of University Place Land Use Inventory

PAGE 2-17
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

The development of University Place as a City has allowed them to focus resources in certain
areas where they had not been in the past. The development of a core area along Bridgeport
Way associated with commercial enterprise and the development of a town center with public
facilities are two of the changes the City has pursued these last 10 years and will continue to
pursue for the foreseeable future.
Table 2-8 Existing Land Use in University Place 18

Type of Use

Acres

R1
R2
Multi-family

3,675
393
265

75
8
5

Residential Total

4,333

88

MU-O
MU
C
NC

30
66
25
52

.6
1.4
.5
1.0

173
Other Land Use Categories

3.5

90
62
217

1.7
1.3
4.5

Other Land Use Total
Total All Uses

369
4,875

7.5
100

Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Open space/Other

614
37
0
888

24
1.5
0
35

60.5

Unbuildable Total
Column Total

1,539
Unbuildable Critical Areas
(slopes>40% & wetlands, etc.)
982
2,521

Commercial Total
TC
IB
PF

Buildable Total

Percent (%)
Residential

Commercial

Vacant Land

39.5
100

PAGE 2-18
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

The development of the Leach Creek area will be an integrated approach looking at the
surrounding densities and types of use as well as the steepness of the slopes along the creek,
and its associated wetlands. This area contains the greatest potential for non-tidal flooding in
the City and this will need to be taken into consideration as well. The City’s comprehensive plan
addresses the Leach Creek area specifically. The overriding goal for Leach Creek is “Establish a
plan for future integrated development of the Leach Creek area…Ensure public facilities and
services including sewers and public roads adequately serve the area. Determine uses and
densities, which are appropriate considering surrounding densities, land uses, steep slopes,
Leach Creek, and wetland areas.” 19 One of the policies coming from this is to consider the steep
slopes and the associated wetlands. This would include clustering and using low impact
development techniques to mitigate the problems.

Employment Information
Table 2-9 Employment Profile 20

Employment Category (SIC)

City of University
Place

Pierce
County

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting and mining
Construction/Res
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate (FIRE)
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade
Retail
Services
Warehousing, Transportation, and Utilities (WTU)
Information
Government
Education, health care and social assistance

42
930
1,095
1,016
365
1,789
3,936
1,240
262
1,140
4,158

-24,297
13,640
17,239
-34,957
132,801
30,278
-34,915
24,382

Table 2-10 City of University Place Unemployment Rate 21

Jurisdiction

Unemployment Rate

City of University Place
Pierce County
Washington State

3.90%
7.5%
8.4%

PAGE 2-19
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 2-11 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Table Key

2-Digit
NAICS
Rating

NAICS CATEGORIES

11
21
22
23
31-33
42
44-45
48-49
51
52
23
54
55
56
61
62
71
72
81

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
Mining
Utilities
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Transportation and Warehousing
Information
Finance and Insurance
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services
Management of Companies and Enterprises
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services
Educational Services
Health Care and Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment and Recreation
Accommodation and Food Services
Other Services (except Public Administration)

Table 2-12 North American Industry Classification System (SIC)Table Key – Major sector categories combine
NAICS categories as follows

Sector Industry Combined (sic)
Construction and Resources (Const/Res): 11,21,23
Finance, Insurance and Real Estate (FIRE): 52,53
Manufacturing: 31-33
Wholesale Trade
Services: 51, 54-56, 61 (private-sector portion), 62,71,72,81
Wholesale Trade, Transportation, and Utilities (WTU): 22, 42, 48,
Government: Public-sector employment, excluding education
Education: 61 (public-sector portion)

PAGE 2-20
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE 2-21
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Endnotes
City of University Place. (2025). Information from Survey Completed by the City of University Place.
City of University Place. (2025). City of University Place, Washington. https://www.cityofup.com/
3
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
4
Washington State Office of Financial Management, Forecasting and Research Division. (2025, November 7). WA
State OFM Small Area Estimates Program. https://ofm.wa.gov/wpcontent/uploads/sites/default/files/public/dataresearch/pop/smallarea/data/metadata/readme_saep_2025_meta
data.pdf
5
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
6
Washington State Office of Financial Management, Forecasting and Research Division. (2025, November 7). WA
State OFM Small Area Estimates Program. https://ofm.wa.gov/wpcontent/uploads/sites/default/files/public/dataresearch/pop/smallarea/data/metadata/readme_saep_2025_meta
data.pdf
7
Pierce County Information Technology Division, Spatial Services. (2026, January). Pierce County Land Value and
Improved Value Estimates.
8
Pierce County Information Technology Division, Spatial Services. (2026, January). Pierce County Total Assessed
Value and Taxable Value Estimates.
9
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics File.
10
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
11
City of University Place. (n.d.). Information provided by the City of University Place based on the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Infrastructure Sectors.
12
City of University Place. (2025). City of University Place Economic Summary.
13
Economic Development Board (EDB) for Tacoma-Pierce County. (2018). Economic Development Board TacomaPierce County Major Employers Publication, 2018.
14
City of University Place. (2018, December 31). Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended
December 31, 2018, City of University Place, Washington, Table 11.
15
U.S. Census. (n.d.). City of University Place Census Fact Finder.
https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF
16
MRSC. (n.d.). Economic and Population Data. http://mrsc.org/Home/Explore-Topics/Finance/Economic-andPopulation-Data/Population-Property-and-Sales-Tax-Archive.aspx
17
University Place Development Services. (n.d.). Land Use Inventory Map.
18
University Place Development Services. (2005). Information from David Swindale, Planning Manager, University
Place Development Services.
19
City of University Place. (2004, December 6). City of University Place Comprehensive Plan. p 1-13
20
Puget Sound Regional Council. (2018). Covered Employment Estimates. https://www.psrc.org/coveredemployment-estimates
21
Washington State Office of Financial Management, Forecasting and Research Division. (2010). WA State OFM
Small Area Estimates Program.
1
2

PAGE 2-22
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 3: Capability
Identification

Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Capability Identification
Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
Planning Process – Requirement §201.6(b)(3). The planning process must include:
(b) Planning process. An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an
effective plan. In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of
natural disasters, the planning process must include:
(3) Review and incorporation, if appropriate, of existing plans, studies, reports, and
technical information.
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C). The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of:
(C) Providing a general description of land uses and development trends within the community
so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions.
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii). This section must include:
(ii) A section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions
and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on
new and existing buildings and infrastructure. All plans approved by FEMA after October 1,
2008, must also address the jurisdiction's participation in the NFIP, and continued compliance
with NFIP requirements, as appropriate.

PAGE 3-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 3: Capability Identification
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE 3-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4
Legal and Regulatory Capability...................................................................................................... 9
Administrative Capability .............................................................................................................. 11
Administrative Capability – Regional ............................................................................................ 12
Technical Capability ...................................................................................................................... 13
Political and Fiscal Capability ........................................................................................................ 15
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Capability ................................................................... 30
Joint Planning Requirement.......................................................................................................... 31
Endnotes ....................................................................................................................................... 32

PAGE 3-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Introduction
The capability assessment is a part of the planning process that illustrates the City of University
Place’s state of affairs. The assessment, as defined by FEMA 386.3 1 has two components. First it
provides an inventory of a community's mission, programs and policies related to mitigating the
hazards threatening the community. Secondly it is an analysis of the community's current
capacity to carry out those programs and policies. It attempts to identify and evaluate existing
policies, regulations, programs, and practices that positively or negatively affect the
community's vulnerability to hazards.
The assessment helps determine the following:
•
•
•

Types of mitigation strategies that may be prohibited by law;
Limitations that may exist on undertaking actions; and
The range of local and/or state administrative, programmatic, regulatory, financial, and
technical resources available to assist in implementing the mitigation strategy.

The capability assessment identifies and assesses existing strategies that are in place that allow
for and/or assist in the implementation of new mitigation strategies to reduce losses and
identify assets. In so doing, non-existent capabilities, or deficiencies, that are necessary for the
implementation of mitigation goals are identified. These are categorized as mitigation
strategies and are thus located in the mitigation strategies section.
The ability for the City to develop an effective hazard mitigation plan depends upon their legal,
administrative, political, fiscal, technical and staffing capabilities to implement plans, policies,
programs, and actions to mitigate losses from natural hazards.
The City of University Place is organized as a non-charter Code City with a Council/Manager
form of government, under the laws of the State of Washington and holds the same powers as
any held by cities or towns.

Background Information
The Census Bureau recognizes five basic types of local governments, one being municipalities.
Municipal governments are organized local governments authorized in state constitutions and
statues and established to provide general government for a defined area.
The City of University Place, Washington, adopted the classification of a non-charter Optional
Code City. It is to be governed by the provisions of Chapter 35A.21 RCW under the councilmanager plan of government. It is endowed with all the applicable rights, powers, privileges,
duties, and obligations of a non-charter Code City. 2
PAGE 3-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

The City of University Place is a senior taxing district. "Senior taxing district" means the state
(for support of common schools), a county, a county road district, a city, or a town. A taxing
district “shall mean any political subdivision, municipal corporation, or other governmental
agency authorized by law to levy or have levied for it a property tax". 3
University Place has the power to levy property taxes, issues bonds, create local improvement
districts with voter approval, and exercise the power of eminent domain,

State Administered Legal and Regulatory
Capability
In Washington State the Washington State Constitution, the Washington Administrative Code
(WAC), and the Revised Codes of Washington (RCW) assign to cities many legal and regulatory
authorities.
The Washington State Constitution is the plan for the operation of Washington State
government. It describes the three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.
It also defines what rights are guaranteed to the people. The State Constitution is the highest
law of the State, although it must also work in compliance with the U.S. Constitution.
The RCW is the compilation of all state statutes now in force. It is a collection of Session Laws
(enacted by the Legislature, and signed by the Governor), or enacted via the initiative process,
arranged by topic, with amendments added and repealed laws removed. It does not include
temporary laws such as appropriation acts. 4
The WAC contains regulations of executive branch agencies issued by authority of statutes. Like
legislation and the Constitution, regulations are a source of primary law in Washington State.
The WAC codifies the regulations and arranges them by subject or agency.
These powers enable the cities to adopt and implement policies and ordinances that may be
used to mitigate the potential harmful effects of natural hazards. Below is a selection of some
of the legal authority and regulatory powers that Washington State has granted to cities. Only
those authorities and powers that are immediately relevant to natural hazard mitigation are
discussed. Of these the Growth Management Act (GMA) of 1990 is the primary driving force for
regulation of land use to mitigate natural hazards in the state.

PAGE 3-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Growth Management Act
Purpose
The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) was passed in 1991 in response to rapid
population growth and unmanaged development in the 1980s. The GMA sets forth several
planning goals such as to curb sprawl, encourage economic development, and protect natural
resources. It requires county and city governments to work together to develop comprehensive
plans, complimentary development regulations, and urban growth area boundaries. The GMA
utilizes several different growth management tools and regulations. Primarily, the GMA
requires cities and counties to jointly develop comprehensive plans that designate urban
growth areas (UGAs) for the county and to identify environmentally critical and resource areas
for protection.
The GMA lists fourteen goals that should be met by communities through their comprehensive
plans:
1. encourage development in urban areas;
2. reduce sprawl;
3. encourage efficient multi-modal transportation systems;
4. encourage the availability of affordable housing;
5. encourage economic development throughout the state;
6. protect private property rights;
7. process permits in a timely, fair, and predictable manner;
8. maintain and enhance natural-resource based industries;
9. encourage the retention of open space and recreational areas;
10. protect the environment;
11. encourage individual participation and coordination;
12. ensure concurrency for public facilities and services;
13. encourage historical and archeological preservation; and
14. protect shorelines. 5

PAGE 3-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Framework
The GMA provides a framework for regional coordination between the cities and counties.
Local comprehensive plans must include the following elements (WAC 365.195.300):
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

land use,
housing,
capital facilities,
utilities,
transportation,
each plan shall contain a process for identifying and sitting essential public facilities, and
for counties, a rural element.

The comprehensive plans guide development and accommodate the population growth
forecast for the next 20 years. Development regulations, including zoning, subdivision, and
other controls, must be consistent with the comprehensive plans. 6 Finally, all jurisdictions fully
planning under the GMA must periodically evaluate and update their comprehensive plans,
development regulations, and UGA boundaries.
Not all cities within the State must plan for future growth. The GMA only requires those having
the fastest growth rates actually develop plans for future growth. University Place is one of the
cities required to produce a comprehensive plan.
One of the key tenets of the GMA is that cities must propose the location of their urban growth
areas (UGAs), and that counties officially designate the UGAs based on the city’s
recommendations. These areas are to accommodate 20 years of growth, based on forecasts
provided by the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM). Urban growth area
designations are to be reviewed every 10 years. No jurisdictional annexations are allowed
beyond designated growth areas. 7
University Place’s boundaries abut only a few square blocks of unincorporated Pierce County.
Because the City is surrounded by Tacoma, Fircrest, Lakewood and Steilacoom there is little
area to be defined as a UGA. Within the City boundaries there is little undeveloped land left.
Therefore, the City has decided that the main thrust of land use planning will be redirected to
focus on revitalization and redevelopment.8
In complying with tenets of the Growth Management Act the City of University Place
established goals and policies as part of the Comprehensive Plan development process. These
goals and policies provided general direction for more specific policies enumerated in the
University Place Comprehensive Plan. City regulations provide the specific requirements to

PAGE 3-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

fulfill the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Some of the policies relevant to natural hazard
mitigation are:
•

•
•
•
•

Create a well-balanced, well-organized combination of land uses, which includes
residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public use, and open space. Make the
protection and preservation of residential neighborhoods a priority.
Require buffers between different types of land uses.
Reserve portions of the remaining undeveloped land for public use.
Identify and preserve wildlife habitat, historical, unique geological and archeological
resources as open space and natural areas.
Provide a zoning mechanism that provides flexibility to manage public property in a
manner that serves the greatest public benefit.

Establish a plan for future integrated development of the Leach Creek area. Determine uses and
densities, which are appropriate considering surrounding densities, land uses, steep slopes,
Leach Creek, and wetland areas.9

PAGE 3-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Legal and Regulatory Capability
Regulation
The City of University Place has regulatory authority within its geographic boundaries. This
includes such areas as flood control, development regulations, and land use planning.

Acquisition
Cities have authority under the Washington State Constitution to purchase property for city
related purposes. Within the geographic boundaries of University Place, primary acquisition
regulatory authority resides with the City. Depending on the situation other recognized entities
such as Washington State, Pierce County, and Special Purpose Districts like West Pierce Fire &
Rescue may have similar authority as granted by statue.
The power of acquisition can be a useful tool for pursuing mitigation goals. The two major flood
problems facing the City are the flood hazards from the creeks, Leach Creek with some
potential and other creeks such as Peach and Chambers Creeks, and secondarily limited surface
water flooding. University Place is developing a program to purchase flood hazard prone
property within the Leach Creek area that will be added to the City’s parks and open spaces.
The City has identified areas where flooding has happened in the past. For its acquisition
program the City gets further information from the Federal Insurance & Mitigation
Administration (FIMA) which manages the National Flood Insurance Program.

Eminent Domain
Eminent domain is the right of a government to appropriate private property for public use or
to remove a blight, with just compensation to the owner. Washington cities are granted this
right under the Washington State Constitution by the enabling statutes Title 8 and Title 35A of
the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). Under these statutes, the following RCWs govern this
right:
•

RCW 8.12.030 (Eminent domain) allows every city and town in Washington to condemn
land and property, public or private, within the city for public use; when deemed
necessary for city purposes, to acquire such land, real estate, premises or other
property. In addition, for certain uses, such as "for public parks, drives and boulevards,
hospitals, pest houses, drains and sewers, garbage crematories… and for aqueducts,
reservoirs, pumping stations and other structures for conveying into and through such
PAGE 3-9
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

•

city a supply of fresh water, and for the purpose of protecting such supply of fresh water
from pollution."
RCW 35.80A.010 Every county, city, and town may acquire by condemnation, in
accordance with the notice requirements and other procedures for condemnation
provided in Title 8 RCW, any property, dwelling, building, or structure which constitutes
a blight on the surrounding neighborhood.

Though this right could be a potential procedure to remove hazard prone property, there can
be, depending on the circumstances, a great deal public opposition to condemnation and
therefore it has limited feasibility in University Place.
Table 3-1 Legal and Regulatory Capability

Regulatory Tools (Ordinances and Codes)

Yes or No

Jurisdiction Capabilities

Building Construction/Design Construction Codes
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
Growth Management Ordinance
Critical Area Ordinance
Hazard Setback Requirements
Hillside and Steep Slope Ordinance
Land Use and Regulatory Codes
Mechanical Codes
Plan Review Requirements
Plumbing Codes
Real Estate Disclosure Requirements
Storm Water Management
Subdivision Ordinance or Regulations
Tax and License Codes
Wildfire Ordinance
Zoning Ordinance

PAGE 3-10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes

Administrative Capability
Table 3-2 Administrative Capability

Administrative Tools (Agency, Departments or Programs)
Jurisdiction Capabilities

Architectural Review Board/Historic Review
Board of Adjustments/Hearing Examiner
Building Official
Chamber of Commerce
City/Town Website
Commercial Fire Safety/Code Inspection Program
Community CPR/First Aid Program (Provided by West Pierce & Rescue)
Community Emergency Response Teams
Downtown Revitalization Committee
Economic Development Board
Emergency Manager
Engineers
Families First Coalition
Fire and Injury Prevention Program (Provided by West Pierce Fire & Rescue)
Fire Chief (Provided by West Pierce Fire)
Fire Safety & Disaster Classes in Schools (Provided by West Pierce Fire)
Flood Plan Manager
Government TV Access
Grant Writers
Home Safety Council
Information included in Utility Bills
Lahar Warning System
Planners
Planning Commission
Police Chief
Police Department
Public Utility (water/power-TPU, gas-PSE, sewer-Pierce County, telecom-Century
Link/Comcast/Click)
Public Works Department
Safe Streets Program
Safety Fairs
Stream Team (Provided by Pierce Conservation District)
Surveyors
City/Town Council
City/Town Meetings
City/Town Planning Commission

PAGE 3-11
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Yes or No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes

Administrative Capability – Regional
Table 3-3 Administrative Capability - Regional

Administrative Tools (Agency, Departments or Programs)
Regional Capabilities

Local Business Districts
Local Department of Emergency Management
Local Fire Agencies Plus Mutual Aid with others
Local Hospitals
Local Law Enforcement Agencies and Mutual Aid with others
Local Neighborhood Associations
Local Neighborhood Emergency Teams (NET)
Local Newspapers (Tacoma News Tribune)
Local Parks Commission/Board
Local Power Companies (Tacoma Public Utilities)
Local Parent Teacher’s Association
Neighboring Counties
Pierce County Department of Emergency Management
Pierce County Fire Chiefs Association
Pierce County Neighborhood Emergency Teams (PCNET)
Pierce County Police Chiefs Association
Pierce County Safe Kids Coalition
Pierce County Sheriff’s Department
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
Puget Sound Energy
Puget Sound Regional Council
Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan
Service Organizations
Tacoma/Pierce County Health Department
Tribes

PAGE 3-12
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Yes or No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Technical Capability
Effective hazard mitigation strategies depend largely on a community’s technical capability and
staffing.
As a non-charter first class city, University Place has an extensive number of resources. With its
Economic Development Office, Community Development Department, Engineering and
Administrative Services, the City has a wide range of expertise to assist in the mitigation
process. The City’s technical sophistication includes the following:
•

Hazard Mitigation Planning Team - Representing all University Place Departments and
including Pierce County Emergency Management is tasked with the overseeing the
development of the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan.

•

A GIS system tied into the County's GIS System – This allows for mapping of hazards,
critical facilities, the City infrastructure and looking at the interplay of factors on the
City.

•

A Community Development Department – Contains professional and technical
employees who understand the hazards threatening the City and how mitigation
projects would alleviate some of them. This also includes the Public Works Division with
the expertise and equipment not only to advise the City on mitigation measures,
develop contracts with providers to mitigate some of the hazards, but also to physically
do some of the mitigation work themselves.

•

Public Education and Awareness Materials on Natural Hazards, much of this gained from
the State, County and Fire District.

The technical sophistication is complemented to a certain degree by the wealth of technical
resources at Federal, State and local levels mentioned below and summarized in Table 3-4, the
University Place Capability Assessment Matrix.
Table 3-4 Technical Capability

Technical Tools (Plans and Other)
Jurisdiction Capabilities

After Action Reports of Any Incident
Capital Improvement Plan
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
Comprehensive Plan
Continuity of Governmental Services and Operations Plan (COOP and COG)
Critical Facilities Plan
Drainage Master Plan
Economic Development Plan
Emergency Evacuation Plan
PAGE 3-13
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Yes or No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Technical Tools (Plans and Other)

Yes or No

Emergency Response Plan
Generator Placement Plan
Habitat Plan
Hazardous Materials Response Plan
Lahar Evacuation Plan
Oil Spill Response Plan
Pandemic Flu Plan
Post-Disaster Recovery Plan
Sewer/Wastewater Comprehensive Plan (Pierce County Sewer)
Storm Comprehensive Plan
Water Comprehensive Plan (Tacoma Public Utilities)

Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes

Coordinated Water System Plan and Regional Supplement 2001
Local and Regional Emergency Exercises – All Types

Yes
Yes

Regional Capabilities

PAGE 3-14
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Political and Fiscal Capability
Political
The City of University Place has a council/manager form of government, as proscribed from
Chapter 35.21 RCW. 10 The 7-member City Council is directly elected by the communities and
serves for staggered four-year terms. The City Council establishes policy by enacting ordinances
and resolutions determined to reflect the needs of the community. The Mayor and a Mayor Pro
Term are elected by the Council from among its members for 2-year terms and presides at City
Council meetings. The Council appoints the City Manager, adopts the City budget, approves
appropriations and contracts in the City's name, levies taxes, and enacts franchises. Several
commissions, made up of citizen volunteers, advise the City Council on matters of concern to
them.11
The Council is the Legislative branch of University Place government and is responsible for:
•
•
•
•
•

Adopting City laws and amending them as necessary;
Determining City policy;
Adopting the City budget;
Approving major contracts, purchases and agreements; and
Approves nominations made of individuals to City advisory board, committees and
commissions.

The City's political leadership has been supportive of issues related to the environment and the
health and safety of the public. That is shown by the City’s vision statement that begins by
saying: “Twenty years after incorporation, University Place is a safe attractive city that provides
a supportive environment for all individuals to work, play, get an education, and raise families.
The physical and mental well-being and health of all individuals is valued.” 12 This is followed in
a discussion on strategies to implement the vision statement with a statement concerning
public safety: Pursue a comprehensive public safety approach to ensure that University Place
remains a safe community in perception and reality; that is proactive and preventive; involves
Police, Fire, Emergency Preparedness, School, Health, and other agencies along with active
community involvement.
University Place’s goals fit very well with the needs of natural hazard mitigation. Many
mitigation projects could fit within the statement above relating to public safety.
University Place offers and operates roads, parks, storm water management, development
services, and other traditional municipal services, all under the policy control of the City Council
and oversight by its appointed City Manager. Police services are contracted with the Pierce
PAGE 3-15
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

County Sheriff’s Department, and the City resides totally within the boundaries of West Pierce
Fire & Rescue.
The City Manager is appointed by the City Council to serve as the chief administrative officer for
the City. The City Manager, responsive to the direction of the City Council, oversees three
departments and the Economic Development Office, carrying out the City's daily business.
These are shown on Figure 3-1, University Place Organization Chart. The City Manager's
responsibilities include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Implementing Council policies;
Management and administration of City operations and capital projects;
Administrative support to the City Council;
Recommending and informing the Council on legislative, financial, and capital
improvement policy, and any other matters relating to the City;
Intergovernmental relations;
Coordinate contracts for those City services that are contracted out to other authorities
or jurisdictions; and
Promoting community awareness, neighborhood involvement and individual
participation in volunteer programs.

Through the Economic Development Office:
•
•

Implement the Economic Development Strategic Action Plan; and
Encourages business development and promote commercial redevelopment.

PAGE 3-16
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Figure 3-1 University Place Organization Chart

PAGE 3-17
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

The City departments’ main responsibilities are:
•

•

•

Community and Economic Development:
o Ensures that the design, construction and use of private and public
property/right-of-way meets the goals expressed in the Comprehensive Plan;
o Ensures compliance with current SEPA, building, zoning, subdivision, public
works critical areas, shoreline and telecommunications codes;
o Provides development services;
o Provides maintenance, and operations of public spaces and roads;
o Reviews and prioritizes capital improvement projects;
o Applies for and administers grants;
o Implements the Comprehensive Plan to ensure consistency with the Growth
Management Act; and
o Maintains a bridge inspection program.
City Attorney:
o Provides legal advice to the City Council and City staff; and other City officials;
o Reviews ordinances, resolution, contracts and other legal documents;
o Advises Council and staff at public meetings;
o Assists in the review of long-range planning and land use development
proposals;
o Ensures that city actions are legally defensible, comply with current law, and
minimize exposure to adverse judgments;
o Represents the City in legal actions; and
o Supports the economic development program.
Finance and Administrative Services:
o Ensures that safety, security, justice, and recreation have high quality programs;
o Ensures that there is effective community information and involvement;
o Operates the City's information technology infrastructure;
o Ensures that proper records are kept of City operations;
o Provides financial services to the City of:
•
Accounting;
•
Grants administration;
•
Accounts payable;
•
Payroll;
•
Purchasing;
•
Banking services; and
•
Investments.
o Coordinates the preparation of the annual budget, Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report, and other associated financial reports;
PAGE 3-18
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

o Manages and issues the City's long-term debt for continued capital
improvements; and
o Prepares and maintains financial analysis to ensure the continued fiscal health of
the City.
The City contracts for several services including emergency management and police and it is
also located within West Pierce Fire & Rescue which affords fire and EMS protection.
•

•

•

Police:
o Provides law enforcement;
o Provides traffic and parking enforcement;
o Coordinates crime prevention activities; and
o Provides criminal investigation.
Emergency Management
o Provides training and exercises for individuals and staff on emergency issues;
o Provides Duty Officer, Emergency Operations Center, and Public Information
coverage for UP emergencies; and
o Reviews City’s Comprehensive Emergency Management and Emergency
Operational Plans.
Fire:
o Perform Firefighting & Rescue;
o Support to FEMA's Urban Search and Rescue Team;
o Respond to Emergency Medical incidents;
o Present Public Education programs on Safety issues to the public;
o Respond to Hazardous Material incidents; and
o Perform fire and arson investigations.

As can be seen from the wide range of responsibilities contained in the above descriptions, the
potential for mitigation work within the current structure is great and some measures are
already being done. University Place has been actively involved in mitigating the effects of
natural hazards. The City’s Comprehensive Plan includes policies to reduce flood, landslide,
erosion, and seismic hazards. The City has a Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) 13 that serves to
address and minimize the potential impacts from those hazards. University Place supports
public education and awareness through public education programs, both developed internally
and those sponsored by West Pierce Fire & Rescue. The City also has a program to mitigate
some of the flood hazard within the City through such actions as buyouts of some properties in
the Leach Creek area that can then be turned into park and recreation properties.

PAGE 3-19
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Taxation
Cities within Washington using the Optional Municipal Code are granted their taxing authority
under the Washington State Constitution by the enabling statutes Titles 35A.82 and 35A.84 of
the Revised RCW. Under these statutes, the following RCWs govern city taxing ability:
•

•

•

RCW 35.22.280 (2) To provide for levying and collecting taxes on real and personal
property for its corporate uses and purposes, and to provide for the payment of the
debts and expenses of the corporation;
RCW 84.52.056 allows excess levies for capital purposes. "Any municipal corporation
otherwise authorized by law to issue general obligation bonds for capital purposes may,
at an election duly held after giving notice thereof as required by law, authorize the
issuance of general obligation bonds for capital purposes only";
RCW 84.52.069 allows municipalities to levy up to 50 cents per thousand dollars of
assessed valuation for emergency medical care or emergency medical services. The levy
can be enacted each year for six consecutive years, each year for ten consecutive years,
or permanently.

University Place is located within the boundaries of Pierce County and therefore must adhere to
the County tax system. The Pierce County Assessor-Treasurer's office determines the property
tax base for University Place and ensures that levies are not more than allowed by law. The tax
system uses the assessed value and the total tax base for the City, which may include other
taxing districts, to calculate the amount of property taxes owed for each parcel. The property
tax is collected by the County to support the administration of the City. Excess levies or local
levies are approved by voters at the polls, and can include bond issues, maintenance and
operation, and capital improvements.
University Place's 2024 property taxes include:
•

•

University Place’s currently funded by regular tax levies allowed by RCW 52.16.130,
RCW 52.16.140 and RCW 52.16.160 which produce $1.04 in taxes per thousand dollars
of assessed valuation on taxable property.
University Place currently has no excess levies or bonds currently issued:

The total City of University Place property tax levy is$1.01 per $1,000 of assessed value with a
yield of $ $6,947,095 for 2024.
The other major revenue going into the General Fund include Sales tax which collected $4.4
million in 2024 and the Utility Tax which brought in $4.77 million in 2024.

PAGE 3-20
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Two funds that might be usable for mitigation projects are;
•

•

1st ¼% Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) had $1,612,614 available in 2024. It is to be used
for construction projects such as street improvements, new street construction, park
land acquisition, park improvements as well as water, wastewater and stormwater
improvements.
2nd ¼% Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) is expected to have $516,655 dollars available in
2019 with a decrease to around $484,948 in 2020. It is used for similar projects as the
1st ¼% REET, except it is not eligible for the purchase of park land.

In addition, the City charges for many of its services. These include building permits,
engineering fees, planning fees, fire fees, franchise fees, and business license fees. Together
these brought in $3,676,053 in 2018 and are expected to be slightly over $4,055,402 for
2019. .14
The above-mentioned taxing capabilities and other revenue sources are a possible fiscal
resource for City of University Place. There are, however, some limitations to these fiscal
resources.
In Washington State, levy rates are limited by either the $5.90 Levy Limit or the 1%
Constitutional Limit.
•

•

RCW 84.52.043, or the $ 5.90 Levy Limit, states that the aggregate regular levy rates of
senior taxing districts (this includes cities) may not exceed $5.90 per thousand dollars
assessed valuation. The levy by any city cannot exceed $3.37 per thousand dollars of
assessed value. Some property tax levies not subject to this limit include state levies,
levies for public utility districts, excess property tax levies, special levies for local school
districts, levies for acquiring conservation futures, emergency medical service levies, low
income housing levies, and some metropolitan park district levies.
RCW 84.52.050 or the 1% Constitutional Limit prohibits the aggregate of all tax levies on
real and personal property from exceeding one percent ($10 per $1,000) of the true and
fair market value of property. This limit does not apply to excess levies, levies by port
districts, and levies by public utility districts.

The tax rate applied to a given property is the sum of the levy rates imposed by all the taxing
districts within which the property lies. The total tax rate to any given property by overlapping
taxing districts is controlled by the previously mentioned $5.90 limit and the 1 percent
constitutional limit. Should either of these limits be exceeded, the levies involved would be
reduced according to a statutory formula.
•

RCW 84.52.010(2) states which levies are lowered and how much in prorating. The
order depends upon whether the $5.90 limit or the 1 percent limit has been exceeded. If
the $5.90 limit has been exceeded, levies are reduced or eliminated in the order, until
PAGE 3-21
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

the total tax rate is at $5.90. Note that within each grouping, the levy rates of the City
are reduced on a pro rata basis.
RCW 84.36.381 and RCW 84.38.010 through RCW 84.38.030 allow both senior citizen and
disability exemptions for low-income individuals.
•

•

RCW 84.36.381 states the legislature has established a senior citizen or disability
exemption based upon a person's age and yearly income. The state constitution
provides that the state legislature has the power to grant to retired persons relief from
the property tax on the real property on which they live. This exemption may be
restricted, as the legislature deems proper.
RCW 84.38.010 through 84.38.030 allows for a senior citizen or disability deferral of
property taxes states if a property owner is at least 60 years old and retired from regular
gainful employment, that owner may qualify to defer payment of special assessments
and/or real property taxes up to 80 percent of the amount of equity in the property.
Eligibility is based on income.

Bonding
University Place as a Category 1 city has the authority for issuing bonds. There are two types of
bonds the City can use in order to raise capital, councilmanic and general obligation bonds.
Traditionally these have been used to fund needs in roads, infrastructure, public safety and
park needs.
•

•

Councilmanic Bonds are bonds where the sale of which is generated by City Council
action. They are limited to 1.5% of the total assessed property value of the jurisdiction.
They are available for a wide range of projects deemed necessary by the City Council.
General Obligation Bonds are bonds which must go to the public for approval. They can
be proposed for a wide range of projects and are divided into three different categories
based on the type of project advanced:
o General Purpose Bonds limited to 1.0% of total assessed value;
o Parks and Open Space Bonds limited to 2.5% of total assessed value; and
o Utility Purposes Bonds are also limited to 2.5% of total assessed value.

PAGE 3-22
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Figure 3-2 shows the debt capacity for the City of University Place. As can be seen, out of the
total available bonding capacity for the City of $348,292,922, 86.82%, or $302,399,173 is
available for a variety of purposes.
Figure 3-2 Debt Capacity

PAGE 3-23
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Local Improvement District
Local Improvement Districts are created to rectify a problem or interest in a very specific
geographic location. They have a long history of use at the community level. They have the
distinction of needing approval by the individuals directly affected by the LID for one to be
formed. This is done through an appeals process. Individuals can show proof that the LID will
not benefit them enough for it to be formed. LIDs are not allowed to be formed without a
market value test. The cost of the assessment cannot exceed the projected increase in property
values. This is based on the individual property, not on the aggregate whole. This means that a
complex system could be set up to assess those properties which will have a higher benefit than
others at a higher rate if applicable. If individuals do not attend hearings on an LID to express
their concern and show proof that it would not have a net benefit to them the LID may become
a matter of fact.

Spending
In Washington, RCW 84.52.020 states that any city with a population of less than 300,000 shall
"certify to the county legislative authority, for the purposes of levying district taxes, budgets or
estimates of their amounts to be raised by taxation on the assessed valuation of their property
in the city."
In Washington State the County will act as a financial agent or bank, to collect taxes and
assessments authorized and levied, and to credit disburse revenues to the City.
The City Council in coordination with the City Manager determines how University Place’s
budget will be developed and how expenditures will be spent. The Pierce County Treasurer acts
as a financial agent or bank for the City and certifies that the City’s budget request is in line with
the funds produced by their taxing area.

Current Fiscal State
The tax revenues are currently meeting expenditure needs, but several issues are and will be
affecting University Place's fiscal capability in the future. First, the City of University Place, due
to its location between other cities and towns, has no ability to expand its tax base outside of
the current city limits through jurisdictional annexation.
City administrators in the various departments identify personnel to staff the Hazard Mitigation
Planning Team and therefore to assist in the development, implementation, and oversight of
the City’s Plan. In addition, staff have the responsibility of developing the City’s Comprehensive
Plan. The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) recommends many of the hazard mitigation

PAGE 3-24
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

programs developed for the City. In all the total administrative capability depends largely on
the staff running their daily operations (see Table 3-5).
The City will continue exploring other sources of mitigation monies such as grants, tax levies,
bonds, the formation of LIDs, future HMGP grants, and Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant
Program Grants.
Table 3-5 Fiscal Capability

Fiscal Tools (Taxes, Bonds, Fees, and Funds)

Yes or No

Jurisdiction Capabilities

TAXES:
• Authority to Levy Taxes
BONDS:
• Authority to Issue Bonds
FEES:
• Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service
• Impact Fees for Homebuyers/Developers for New Developments/Homes
• Local Improvement District (LID)
FUNDS:
• Capital Improvement Project Funds
• Enterprise Funds
• General Government Fund (Departments)
• Internal Service Funds
• Special Revenue Funds
• Withhold Spending in Hazard-Prone Areas

Regional Capabilities

Pierce County Land Conservancy
Cascade Land Conservancy

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Federal and State
Agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Washington
State Emergency Management Division (EMD) have made available numerous implementation
manuals and other resource documents. These manuals provide information on mitigation
techniques for various hazards including floods, earthquakes, severe storms, volcanoes, and
landslides. One important set of manuals is the FEMA 386 Mitigation Planning "How-To" Series.
Internet resources are also a valuable technical asset. Hazard-specific sites are available at both
the federal and state levels. These are outlined in this plan at the end of each Hazard SubSection within the Risk Assessment.

PAGE 3-25
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

There are also key personnel at both the State and Federal level that can assist the City.
Examples on the federal level include members of FEMA, USGS, EPA, and US Army Corps of
Engineers. Examples at the State level include but are not limited to the Washington State EMD,
Washington State Department of Ecology, and the Washington State Department of Natural
Resources.

Pierce County
Pierce County has an extensive resource of existing personnel and technical resources that can
assist the City with mitigation planning and implementation of specific mitigation actions. Of
the many departments in Pierce County government, the following have been identified as
potential resources: Emergency Management (DEM), Planning and Public Works, the
Executive’s Office, Information Technology-Geographic Information Services Division (GIS),
Economic Development Division, and the County Assessor-Treasurer. For a more detailed list of
some departments and personnel with an immediate knowledge of the County's and/or the
City hazard mitigation efforts, see list below.

Emergency Management (EM)
EM has staff of about 60 including emergency managers and staff and gets a large percentage
of its budget from grants. EM is responsible for providing the following functions to the City of
University Place:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Coordinate development of the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan;
Education or expertise to assess the community’s vulnerability to hazards;
Prepare and coordinate plans for Emergency Management with the County in the event
of a disaster;
Develop mutual aid agreements to be executed by the County Executive for the
purposes of regional Emergency Management;
Manage and coordinate the County inter-departmental radio communications system
and the Tactical Area Communications bus in support of the City; and
Manage, coordinate and maintain system database for County-wide (including
municipalities) computerized telephone emergency access Enhanced 9-1-1 system.

PAGE 3-26
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Some valuable tools and resources EM can provide are listed below:
•
•
•
•
•
•

County HIRA;
County View (GIS Desktop Database);
NOAA Weather Radios;
Pierce County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan;
Pierce County Mitigation Forum; and
Pierce Responder System.

Planning and Public Works Water Programs (PPW-SWM)
The mission of the SWM division is to provide comprehensive storm drainage systems which
minimize economic loss and enhance water quality; to maintain the flood control capacity in
the University Place, and to coordinate and facilitate planning and construction of the
community’s drinking water supply consistent with Pierce County’s Coordinated Water System
and Comprehensive Plans.
Some valuable tools and resources SWM can provide are listed below:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Flood Event Information currently being incorporated into a University Place database;
Floodplain management administration;
CIP Construction Projects;
Watershed Planning for Non-point Pollution Control;
Comprehensive Basin Planning;
Water Quality and NPDES;
Coordinated Water Supply Plan and Water Utility Plan (with private purveyors and the
City of Tacoma);
Flood Hazard Areas and Regulations;
Water Programs Flood Bulletin;
Flood Hazard Warning System;
ESA: Salmon and the Endangered Species Act (in response to regulatory requirements);
and
CRS: Community Rating System.

Planning and Public Works Transportation Program PPW-TP
The duties and tasks of the PPW-TP are separated into six different subject areas:
transportation planning, interagency coordination, program development, transportation
engineering and project development, road information, and corridor studies. The PPW-TP is

PAGE 3-27
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

responsible for Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 2003-2008. The TIP informs other
jurisdictions of Pierce County's current planning direction for transportation needs.

Information Technology - Geographic Information System (GIS)
Division
Pierce County operates a geographic information system that provides essential information
and technology for hazard response and mitigation under a GIS desktop database called
CountyView. The GIS system provides detailed data on property ownership, location, and land
use type. GIS allows this information to be displayed visually to assist in hazard mitigation
planning. The City is tied directly into this database enabling it to access updated GIS hazard
information from the County as it becomes available.
The GIS desktop database provides fast access to, and processing of, detailed data that can be
used by EM to assist in deployment of resources before, during, and after a natural disaster.
The system also permits data and visual analysis of the impacts of past events, thereby assisting
in planning for mitigation of future natural disasters.

PAGE 3-28
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 3-6 City of University Place Capability Matrix

Potential Capacity
Legal and Regulatory
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Administrative and Technical

GMA
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Facility Plan
Zoning Ordinance
Subdivision Ordinance
Critical Areas Ordinance
Building Code
Real Estate Disclosure
Comprehensive Emergency
Management
Acquisition Authority
Eminent Domain
DMA 2000
National Flood Insurance Program

Hazard
Multi-Hazard
Windstorm
Flood
Earthquake
Severe Storms
Landslide

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

51 Regular Status
City Employees
PC DEM
PC P&PW
PC Water Program
PC Transportation
Program
Pierce County
Assessor-Treasurer
Pierce County
Desktop GIS
(CountyView)

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

FEMA 386 How To
Manuals
WA State HIRA
Pierce County HIRA
University Place HIRA
PC NET/CERT
Neighborhoods
Planning Regulations
University Place
Building Codes
Department of
Ecology
(flood mgmt.)
WA EMD

Political and Fiscal
•
•
•
•
•
•

Policies and Plans
University Place Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP)
Mutual Aid Agreements
Comprehensive Plan – Flood Prone Area Management
Critical Areas Ordinance – Flood Damage Protection
Comprehensive Plan – Seismic Hazard Planning
Comprehensive Plan – Sensitive Areas
Critical Areas Ordinance – Geologic Hazards

Taxing Authority
Supportive City Government
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant
Program
Community Development Block
Grants
Emergency Management Program
Grant

Measures
With the Fire District Develop a
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
NOAA Weather Radios Campaign
Support PC NET Program
Public Education and Awareness
Repetitive Loss Property Acquisition
Public Education and Awareness
Public Education and Awareness
Studies of City Buildings
Public Education and Awareness
Public Education and Awareness

PAGE 3-29
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) Capability
NFIP Status
The City entered the NFIP on October 25, 1977. The City is in good standing in the NFIP as
certified by Washington State Department of Ecology. The last Community Assistance Visit was
completed on November 30, 2015, and there were no unresolved issues reported. The City of
University Place does not have any identified repetitive flood loss severe repetitive flood loss
sites identified.

PAGE 3-30
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Joint Planning Requirement
The City of University Place’s joint planning between the Pierce County RHMP and other
existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information is located in the Pierce County Base
Plan’s Section 3: Capability Identification.

PAGE 3-31
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Endnotes
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003, April). FEMA 386-3, Developing the Mitigation Plan:
Identifying Mitigation Actions and Implementation Strategies, Version 1.0, April 2003, p. 2-6.
2
City of University Place. (n.d.). City of University Place Municipal Code 1.01.010.
3
Washington State Legislature. (n.d.). WAC 458-19-005 (2) (t).
4
Washington State Legislature. (n.d.). WAC 458-19-005 (2) (t).
5
University of Texas at Austin. (n.d.). State Sprawl Cases. http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~bobprp/statesprawl/Cases/
gma%20case%20study%204-22-03.doc, p 8.
6
Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC). (n.d.). Comprehensive Planning.
http://www.mrsc.org/Subjects/Planning/compplan.aspx
7
Washington State Legislature. (n.d.). RCW 36.70A.110.
8
City of University Place. (2013, October 21). City of University Place Comprehensive Plan, Adopted, July 6, 1998.
9
City of University Place. (2013, October 21). City of University Place Comprehensive Plan, Adopted, July 6, 1998.
10
City of University Place. (n.d.). University Place Municipal Code, Title 1.01.010.
11
City of University Place. (n.d.). Committees, Commissions, and Partners. http://www.cityofup.com/committeescommissions-and-partners
12
City of University Place. (n.d.). City Council Vision Statement.
http://cityofup.com/sites/default/files/pdfs/CityCouncil/VisionStatement.pdf
13
City of University Place. (2013, October). City of University Place Ordinance # 630.
14
City of University Place. (n.d.) Finance Department.
1

PAGE 3-32
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 4: Risk Assessment
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Risk Assessment Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i), §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C),
and §201.6(c)(2)(iii). This plan must include the following:
(2) A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy
to reduce losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient
information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation
actions to reduce losses from identified hazards. The risk assessment must include:
(i) A description of the type, location, and extent of all natural hazards that can
affect the jurisdiction. The plan must include information on previous occurrences
of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events.
(ii) A description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in
paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. This description must include an overall summary
of each hazard and its impact on the community. All plans approved after October
1, 2008 must also address NFIP insured structures that have been repetitively
damaged by floods. The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of:
(A) The types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and
critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas;
(B) An estimate of the potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified
in paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology
used to prepare the estimate;
(C) Providing a general description of land uses and development trends within
the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use
decisions.
(iii) For multi-jurisdictional plans, the risk assessment section must assess each
jurisdiction's risks where they vary from the risks facing the entire planning area.

PAGE 4-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Section 4: Risk Assessment
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE 4-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Table of Contents
Risk Assessment Requirements ...................................................................................................... 1
Section Overview ............................................................................................................................ 4
Hazard Identification....................................................................................................................... 6
Vulnerability and Consequence Analysis ...................................................................................... 16
Endnotes ....................................................................................................................................... 49

PAGE 4-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Section Overview
The Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan (RHMP) Risk Assessment in this
Jurisdictional Annex builds upon Section 4: Risk Assessment in the Pierce County RHMP Base
Plan. This Jurisdictional Annex’s Risk Assessment portrays the threats of natural and humancaused hazards, the vulnerabilities of a jurisdiction to those hazards, and the consequences of
hazards specific to City of University Place (see Figure 4-1).
Figure 4-1 Risk Assessment Methodology

Threat

Vulnerability

Consequence

Risk

In Pierce County RHMP Base Plan, each of the following natural hazards is addressed as a threat
and is identified and profiled in the Hazard Identification Subsection: drought, earthquake,
flood, landslide, severe weather, tsunami and seiche, volcano, and wildfire. Each of the
following human-caused hazards is also identified in the Pierce County RHMP Base Plan: civil
unrest, cyber, dam failure, epidemic and pandemic, hazardous materials and transportation
accidents, and terrorism and extremism.

PAGE 4-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Connecting Base Plan and Jurisdictional
Annex
The Pierce County RHMP Base Plan’s Hazard Identification describes in-detail each hazard’s
description, definition, type, location and extent, occurrence, and probability of recurrence.
This Jurisdictional Annex builds upon the Base Plan’s Hazard Identification and specifically
focuses on City of University Place. In this Jurisdictional Annex, hazard type, location and
extent, occurrences, and probability of recurrence for all natural and human-caused hazards
are referenced in the Hazard Identification Subsection.
The Base Plan’s Risk Assessment describes, in-detail, the county’s vulnerabilities to each given
hazard with county-level maps. This Jurisdictional Annex builds upon the Base Plan’s Risk
Assessment and specifically focuses on City of University Place. In this Jurisdictional Annex,
vulnerabilities to and consequences of a given hazard are addressed in the Vulnerability and
Consequence Analysis Subsection. Vulnerability is analyzed in terms of exposure of both
population and infrastructure to each hazard. Consequences are identified as anticipated,
predicted, or documented impacts caused by a given hazard when considering the vulnerability
analysis and the characteristics of the hazard as outlined in its identification. This Jurisdictional
Annex’s Vulnerability Analysis is displayed in the following tables: 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4.
The Pierce County RHMP Base Plan’s Consequence Analysis Subsection is organized by the
hazard threats each hazard poses to City of University Place. This Jurisdictional Annex’s
Vulnerability and Consequence Analysis Subsection has City of University Place’s jurisdictionspecific Consequence Analysis that assesses impacts from natural and human-caused hazards in
Table 4-5 and Table 4-6. The impacts detailed in these tables are utilized to prioritize mitigation
direction and projects in this Jurisdictional Annex’s Section 5: Mitigation Strategy.
Through a series of county-level maps, the Base Plan maps the threats natural and humancaused hazards pose. This Jurisdictional Annex builds upon that mapping by including a series of
hazard maps on the local level for City of University Place. The threats that hazards pose to City
of University Place are mapped to determine each hazard’s exposure to City of University Place
in the Maps Subsection.

PAGE 4-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Hazard Identification
In the Pierce County RHMP Base Plan’s Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment, all hazards
are analyzed on the county-level. All hazards in the Base Plan are organized into subsections
and are grouped by hazard-type, natural and human-caused, and then alphabetically within
each type. This Jurisdictional Annex follows the Base Plan’s hazard organization and analyzes
hazards specifically impacting City of University Place’s jurisdiction. Per 44 CFR §201.6(c)(2)(i),
the Jurisdictional Annex Hazard Identification Subsection describes the type, location, and
extent of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction and information on previous
occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events. This critical hazard
information for the City of University Place is featured in the Natural Hazards in Pierce County
Table and the Human-Caused Hazards in Pierce County Table in the Pierce County RHMP Base
Plan, Section 4: Risk Assessment.
Furthermore, per 44 CFR §201.6(c)(2)(ii), the Jurisdictional Annex Hazard Identification
Subsection address whether NFIP insured structures have been repetitively damaged by floods
in City of University Place and should include general description of land uses and development
trends in the community. If either the NFIP or land use elements detailed above are relevant to
each jurisdiction, they are included in this subsection. A more detailed discussion of the hazards
can be found in the Pierce County RHMP Base Plan.

Natural Hazards
The following Jurisdictional Annex Hazard Identification Subsection details a local description of
all natural hazards in the City of University Place’s jurisdiction. Each natural hazard description
is a local, place-based narrative detailing the experiences that the City of University Place has
had with these hazards. These descriptions are not stand-alone hazard profiles. Rather, this
Subsection’s descriptions build upon the Base Plan’s Hazard Identification content. If the City of
University Place does not have significant hazard experiences to share, there is a referral to the
Base Plan’s Hazard Identification Subsection for that hazard.

Drought
The potential for Drought to create emergency or disaster conditions in City of University Place
was evaluated. City of University Place like much of the rest of Western Washington has been
affected by droughts in the past. The most recent drought conditions of any seriousness were in
1996-7 and 2001. The lack of rainfall during the winter of 2005 created a drought condition that
was alleviated by the spring rains. Conditions in the past, while uncomfortable in requiring
PAGE 4-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

voluntary water rationing, were not bad enough to require deeper measures. Drought can lead
to dryer conditions that can worsen wildfire conditions.

Earthquake
The earthquake hazard was determined to have a major impact. It is difficult to determine the
probability of occurrence as earthquakes do not seem to follow traditional timing frequencies
like severe weather, storms, etc. The last major earthquake to impact the City of University
Place was the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. City of University Place, much like Pierce County, is in
the path of the Nisqually Fault, Seattle Fault, Tacoma Fault, and the Cascadia Subduction Zone
Fault. An earthquake with a magnitude of 7.1 along the Tacoma Fault would create an
economic loss of at least $61 million or greater. 1 Public facilities, utilities, schools, commercial
businesses, healthcare facilities, senior housing and residential communities would all be
affected. The City of University Place recognizes that an earthquake depending on the
magnitude can create many secondary and tertiary hazards that will create the need for
prioritization based on resource availability which raises this hazard on the list of concern. In a
survey we’ve done with the community earthquakes were the main hazard of concern within
the community with 81% of individuals who took the survey listing it as a concern.

Flood
Flooding within the City of University Place is a highly localized incident mainly along the Puget
Sound coastal areas and some inland locations next to creeks, streams, and marsh-like lands.
The areas identified as being at risk of flood are the banks of Leach Creek in the City of
University Place, Chambers Creek at the border of Lakewood and the City of University Place,
and the communities of Sunset Beach and Day Island in the City of University Place. Historically,
King Tides are a cause of concern in the Sunset Beach and Day Island communities for flooding.
In December of 2022, King Tide floods, which are an extremely high tides occurred with a rainy
winter storm, low barometric pressure, and onshore winds which led to coastal flooding in Day
Island. West Pierce Fire and Rescue deployed dive teams to check on residents and assist with
getting them out of their houses and to safety.

Landslide
The landslide hazard was determined to have more of an impact in various areas around the
City of University Place depending upon whether it is a deep or shallow landslide. Additionally,
the frequency or probability of occurrence is highly dependent upon severe weather/flooding,
geological or manmade events. A landslide consists of the movement of rock and soil that

PAGE 4-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

creates slope movement. Movement can consist of falling, toppling, sliding, spreading, and/or
flowing. 2
The maps below show both deep and shallow landslides. The most moderate to high-risk areas
for a deep landslide resides along the Puget Sound shoreline, Chambers Creek and Leach Creek,
as can be seen in Map 4-1. The risk of shallow landslides is included in the aforementioned
areas. However, the risk of shallow landslides affects more areas throughout the City of
University Place as seen in Map 4-2.

Severe Weather
Severe Weather is not a regular occurrence in the Pacific Northwest. City of University Place
enjoys a very mild climate. The summer of 2015 was one of the hottest and driest on record
with more than 10 days over 90 degrees. Since then, warmer climates have trended upwards,
leading to concerns of extreme heat, especially with more vulnerable populations within the
community. On average, December is the coolest month with the lowest recorded temperature
being five degrees in 1985. The average yearly rainfall is 39 inches, and the average snowfall is
eight inches. The number of days with measurable precipitation on average each year is 146,
with the remaining days varying from sunny, to partly cloudy, to overcast. Severe weather is a
risk to the community. City of University Place does have several trees and would be prone to
damaged or downed trees that would affect roadways and utility lines during these types of
severe weather events. Based on the West Pierce Hazards Community Survey, severe
windstorms and severe winter storms were the second and third highest hazards of concern
among the community members who took the survey.

Tsunami and Seiche
The Tsunami hazard was determined to have a minimal direct impact and low probability of
occurrence. A tsunami, sometimes called a tidal wave, consists of a series of high-energy waves
that radiate outward like pond ripples from the area in which the generating incident occurred,
inundating the low-lying areas near the shore. Earthquakes and landslides (along steep slopes,
underwater, and river delta failure) are the most likely sources in Puget Sound.3 WA EMD
identifies Pierce County coastal regions as places potentially impacted by tsunamis. 4 Steep
bluffs throughout the Sound and the location of faults form the basis for this conclusion.
However, due to land use decisions and development patterns, very little of the built
environment in the City of University Place would be impacted by a tsunami. As shown on Map
4-3, most low-lying coastal areas in the City of University Place are undeveloped open space
(Chambers Creek Properties) and owned by Pierce County. Only a small portion of Day Island to
the north would be impacted by a tsunami, in addition to potential tsunami damage to the
PAGE 4-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Sunset Beach area. Due to the infrequent rates of occurrence for tsunamis in the area and the
development patterns of the coastal areas in the City of University Place, the overall risk to a
tsunami is minimal.

Volcano and Lahar
While the City of University Place will not likely be directly impacted by a volcanic incident, it
will likely be an area of refuge from individuals throughout Pierce County whose homes would
be affected if Mount Rainier erupted. With a potential increase of population due to a volcanic
event, West Pierce Fire and Rescue has assessed this hazard as a risk for the jurisdictions.
Another risk is that of isolation. Many of the roads utilized for commerce and travel to work
may be impacted in the incident of a volcanic eruption. The potential for ashfall directly
affecting the City of University Place is acknowledged, but the potential for major ashfall is
remote.
Types of non-magmatic volcanic hazards include debris flows, lahars, toxic gases and landslides.
Types of non-magmatic volcanic hazards include lava flows, tephra (airborne volcanic ash), and
pyroclastic flows and surges. The Pierce County Base Plan, Section 4: Risk Assessment has
additional detail on these volcanic hazard types and their impacts to Pierce County jurisdictions.

Wildfire
While City of University Place has a relatively low risk of wildfire, the City of University Place
recognizes that there are ways to mitigate a potential wildfire. There are vulnerable
populations within the City of University Place who would be more affected by a wildfire and
may lack the necessary resources to prepare for and respond to a wildfire threat. Fire District,
West Pierce Fire and Rescue, experienced a wildfire at Fort Steilacoom Park in the neighboring
city of Lakewood that burned roughly 40 acres. Additional resources from assisting agencies
and Department of Natural Resources were needed. Due to the location of the fire, homes
were evacuated. This shows an increasing risk of wildfire creeping into communities.

PAGE 4-9
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Human-Caused Hazards
The following Jurisdictional Annex Hazard Identification Subsection details a local description of
all human-caused hazards in the City of University Place’s jurisdiction. Each human-caused
hazard description is a local, place-based narrative detailing the experiences that the City of
University Place has had with these hazards. These descriptions are not stand-alone hazard
profiles. Rather, this Subsection’s descriptions build upon the Base Plan’s Hazard Identification
content. If the City of University Place does not have significant hazard experiences to share,
there is a referral to the Base Plan’s Hazard Identification Subsection for that hazard.

Civil Unrest
University place holds a population of approximately 35,000 residents. It is mostly a suburban
area that is located between two larger cities, Lakewood and Tacoma. Crime per capita is
relatively moderate to low and low for violent crimes. Since its inception, the City of University
Place has had no historical civil disturbances. The City of University Place contracts for police
services with the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department and shares tactical resources. In case of a
large civil disturbance response, the City of University Place would rely on its contractual police
services along with mutual aid from other law enforcement agencies.

Cyber
Pierce County including South Sound 9-1-1, Pierce County Radio Communications, Washington
State Patrol, and many other local agencies. In 2019 the top threats were:
•
•
•
•
•

Phishing/spear phishing;
Ransomware;
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack;
Advance Persistent Threat; and
Fileless Malware.

The top vectors or common access points were:
•
•
•
•

Email attachments/links;
Drive-by or download;
Webserver/Web app; and
USB drives.

PAGE 4-10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

During times of disaster there is a significant increase in scams, phishing attacks, and Advance
Persistent Threat attacks to gain access to financial and cyber systems. In COVID-19 there was a
significant increase in attacks against medical centers and collaboration platforms.

Dam Failure
For more information on dam failure hazards in Pierce County, please see the Pierce County
RHMP Base Plan, Section 4: Risk Assessment. For local dam failure hazard information for the
City of University Place, please see the Vulnerability and Consequence Analysis Subsection.

Epidemic and Pandemic
Diseases vary based on the severity of the disease, duration of the illness and spread within the
community. The most threatening emergency management situation is the outbreak of a new
disease with high rates of illness and death. New disease outbreaks can quickly overwhelm local
hospitals, healthcare providers and decrease society's ability to maintain critical services.
An outbreak can be characterized by the extent of spread of the disease. An outbreak is
considered pandemic if the disease spreads throughout the world. The outbreak is considered
epidemic if it's above normal disease levels within a geographical area. More common diseases
are classified as endemic, as they are at or below normal levels within a community. Brand new
diseases can quickly become an epidemic/pandemic if there is little or no immunity in the
population.
The COVID-19 Pandemic was a significant, multi-year incident that left lasting impact to
communities on both the international level and locally in Pierce County. The COVID-19
Pandemic reshaped standard modes of transportation; redefined standard working
environments; left a lasting strain on the public health sector; and left record deaths in its
wake. In 2025, Pierce County is still recovering from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Hazardous Materials and Transportation Accidents
City of University Place has three major areas related to hazardous material, the Narrows
Marina, the Railway that runs North to South along its border to Puget Sound, and two of its
major arterials Bridgeport Way West that runs North to South and Cirque Drive West that runs
East to West through the heart of the City of University Place. The railway and roadways pose
potential transportation accidents that could involve hazardous materials. Frequently, various
types of freight are transported on those sets of rail lines on a regular basis. The last major
hazmat staging incident occurred at Chambers Bay in 2011. Since then, the City of University
PAGE 4-11
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Place along with first responders and neighboring agencies, have conducted emergency
exercises related to train derailments with hazardous materials.
There are risks for transportation accidents in all roadway networks. These risks are most
pronounced along major roadways and intersections. City of University Place is intersected by
three major arterials, Bridgeport Way West, 27th Street West and Cirque Drive West. The City of
University Place has constructed improvements along these routes to reduce accident risk and
severity such as medians, street lighting, sidewalks and bike lanes. These improvements have
resulted in a reduction of accident rates along these corridors by over 50%. Bridgeport Way
West is the principal arterial running through the City of University Place from the north to the
south carrying approximately 28,000 vehicles per day. This is a four to five lane roadway with
signalized intersections, street lighting, medians, sidewalks and bike lanes. Bridgeport Way
connects to Tacoma and State Route 16 to the north and Lakewood and Interstate 5 to the
south. 67th Avenue West is a secondary arterial, paralleling Bridgeport to the east and serves as
an alternative north-south route.
On average, there are 40 vehicle accidents along Bridgeport per year, which equates to an
accident rate of approximately 1 accident per million vehicle miles. Cirque Drive West is an
arterial that runs from the east to the west through the City of University Place carrying about
15,000 vehicles per day. This is a three to four lane roadway with signalized intersections, a
roundabout, street lighting, medians, sidewalks and bike lanes. Cirque Drive connects to
Tacoma and Interstate 5 to the east.
On average, there are 23 vehicle accidents along Cirque Drive per year, which equates to an
accident rate of approximately 1 accident per million vehicle miles. 27th Street West is an
arterial that runs from the east to the west through the City of University Place carrying about
19,000 vehicles per day. This is a three to four lane roadway with signalized intersections, street
lighting, sidewalks and bike lanes. 27th Street connects to Fircrest, Tacoma and State Route 16
to the east. On average, there are 13 vehicle accidents along 27th Street per year, which
equates to an accident rate of approximately 2 accidents per million vehicle miles. 19th Street,
35th Street, and 40th Street serve as alternate east-west routes to both 27th Street and Cirque
Drive.

Terrorism and Extremism
Attacks can be perpetrated by many different actors with different motivations, such as
terrorists, violent extremists, and targeted violent offenders. All use violent tactics to harm
people and/or property. The consequences of the attack depend on the tactics employed by
the threat actor, such as active shooter(s) events, bombings, arson, murder, kidnapping,
hostage-taking, maritime attack, hijacking or skyjacking, and vehicle ramming.
PAGE 4-12
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

The threat of terrorism and violent extremism has grown with the interconnectedness afforded
by the internet. Terrorist organizations can reach anyone around the world to support or
participate in attacks. The openness of the internet allows for the disconnected/autonomous
sharing of ideas, tactics, and successes that motivate others to act. A social media presence can
be both an indicator and an impact as the younger population including students in schools can
feed off of the message and create localized issues.
The number of active shooter incidents has increased significantly over the last five years.
Intense media coverage of active shooter events has created a heightened sense of risk. It
remains nearly impossible to predict violent attacks, but security and intervention measures are
continuing to evolve with the use of new tactics employed by threat actors. There have been
several incidents in local schools, but none have been tied to terrorist activity. There are many
public spaces and locations vulnerable to attacks within Pierce County.
Incidents of terrorism and active threats have increased in the United States. Local and tribal
police departments, local EMS and fire departments, the Sheriff’s Office, Washington State
Patrol, and regional partners have been training regularly for active threats such as a complex
coordinated terrorist attack. The current threat environment is assessed annually by the
Washington State Fusion Center.

PAGE 4-13
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Changes in Development
The basic form of the City of University Place, including its arterial streets and predominant land
uses, was established prior to incorporation in 1995. The residential areas and commercial
corridors retain a green, partially wooded or landscaped character, although the City of
University Place is almost fully developed. Street lighting, sidewalks, curb/gutters and bicycle
lanes on arterial streets have improved safety and created better connections between
residential and business areas.
The City of University Place abides by the Growth Management Act that provides 13 planning
goals and a system for cities and counties that have experienced rapid population growth. The
City of University Place’s Comprehensive Plan provides policies to guide the physical
development of the City of University Place. The Comprehensive Plan guides the physical
placement of land uses, stewardship of natural settings, movement of people and goods,
addresses utility infrastructure and design, and reviews the uses, development and
environmental impacts to the City of University Place’s shoreline. All of these takes into
consideration the various effects of emergencies and how planning and development can be
used to mitigate low to high probability hazard occurrences.
In 2008, it was estimated that the City of University Place would grow by 20,000 in 2040
through the Puget Sound Regional Councils (PSRC) Vision 2040 program, putting the estimated
future population at 50,000. The population forecast was further modeled during the 2015 City
of University Place Comprehensive Plan Amendments and estimates its population to be
approximately 42,000 by 2035. As the City of University Place has developed most of its 7.86
square miles, the increased population will require areas with increased density housing. The
planning for mixed-use, increased economic development activity, and higher density living
areas will no doubt have an effect on emergency planning, response and recovery.
Despite the relatively insignificant amount of anticipated development, the City of University
Place recognizes as more people move into and work in the City of University Place, the risk of
identified hazards impacting the population increases. The City of University Place continues to
monitor the infrastructure, incorporate elements of the mitigation plan into the existing plans,
ordinances, and programs to dictate land uses and educate the public of hazards through
community outreach. Section 5, Mitigation Strategies identifies measures to build the resiliency
within the City of University Place and have been reviewed and reprioritized to reflect the
changes in development trends.

PAGE 4-14
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Regional Hazard Identification Summary
The City of University Place’s Regional Hazard Identification Summary for natural and humancaused hazards is a part of the Pierce County Regional Hazard Identification Summary Table
located in the Pierce County Base Plan’s Section 4: Risk Assessment.

PAGE 4-15
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Vulnerability and Consequence
Analysis
This Subsection includes an overall summary of each hazard identified in the Jurisdictional
Annex Hazard Identification Subsection and a description of the hazard’s impact to the City of
University Place. Per 44 CFR §201.6(c)(2)(ii), this Jurisdictional Annex must describe the City of
University Place’s vulnerability to all hazards described in this Jurisdictional Annex’s Hazard
Identification Subsection and their impacts to the City of University Place. Furthermore, per 44
CFR §201.6(c)(2)(ii), this Jurisdictional Annex should describe the types and numbers of existing
and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas
as well as an estimate of the potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified. A more
detailed analysis of the City of University Place’s owned infrastructure is addressed in this
Jurisdictional Annex’s Section 6: Infrastructure.
All Vulnerability Analysis content for this Subsection is located in the following tables:
•
•
•
•

Table 4-1 Vulnerability Analysis: General Exposure;
Table 4-2 Vulnerability Analysis: Population Exposure for General and Special
Populations;
Table 4-3 Vulnerability Analysis: General Infrastructure Exposure to Natural Hazards;
and
Table 4-4 Vulnerability Analysis: General Infrastructure Exposure to Human-Caused
Hazards.

The Vulnerability Analysis tables and maps both are tied to the Risk Assessment methodology
detailed in the Base Plan Section 1: Plan Process. The Vulnerability Analysis is specific in
quantifying local risk and designed to meet the Federal Emergency Management’s (FEMA)
requirements for Local Mitigation Planning.
For all Vulnerability Analysis tables, if a hazard value is “N/A,” it indicates that the Pierce County
GIS Mapping System methodology did not quantify substantial risk for the hazard in that
jurisdiction. An “N/A” value does not imply no risk. Rather, the hazard did not meet the
threshold for substantial risk according to the current Pierce County GIS Mapping System
methodology in the Base Plan Section 1: Plan Process.
The Consequence Analysis is not necessarily tied to the Vulnerability Analysis’s methodology.
The seven impacts described in the Consequence Analysis are broad and consider local
emergency management impacts not included in the Vulnerability Analysis. For example, the
Vulnerability Analysis Subsection could show relatively low exposure to the Tacoma Fault Zone
and relatively low liquefaction risk. However, if a Tacoma Fault Zone earthquake happened,
PAGE 4-16
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

many jurisdictions will be impacted even if they have low vulnerability. There could be local
supply chain issues due to regional infrastructure damage or Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) agreements being utilized for resources after a large magnitude earthquake. Therefore,
a Vulnerability Analysis could show both low earthquake risk and also several impacts in the
Consequence Analysis to earthquakes.
Broader emergency management impacts are represented in the Consequence Analysis. The
Consequence Analysis is designed to meet Emergency Management Accreditation Program
(EMAP) standards for hazard mitigation planning. More information on the Consequence
Analysis methodology is located in the Base Plan Section 1: Plan Process.

PAGE 4-17
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

General Exposure
Table 4-1 Vulnerability Analysis: General Exposure 5 6

Threat

Natural Hazards

Base

Drought: Moderate 7
Drought: Severe
Earthquake: Tacoma Fault 8
Earthquake: Liquefaction (Very
Low) 9
Earthquake: Liquefaction (Very
Low to Low)
Earthquake: Liquefaction (Low)
Earthquake: Liquefaction (Low to
Moderate)
Earthquake: Liquefaction
(Moderate)
Earthquake: Liquefaction
(Moderate to High)
Earthquake: Liquefaction (High)
Earthquake: Liquefaction (N/A
Bedrock)
Earthquake: Liquefaction (N/A
Peat)
Earthquake: Liquefaction (N/A Ice)
Earthquake: Liquefaction (N/A
Water)
Flood: Flood Zone 10
Landslide: Deep 11
Landslide: Shallow 12
Landslide: Steep Slopes
(Moderate) 13
Landslide: Steep Slopes (High)
Landslide: Steep Slopes (Very
High)
Severe Weather: Weather Risk
Index (Very Low) 14
Severe Weather: Weather Risk
Index (Relatively Low)
Severe Weather: Weather Risk
Index (Relatively Moderate)
Severe Weather: Weather Risk
Index (Relatively High)

Area (Sq Mi)
Total
8.34

Parcels

% Base

Total

% Base

7.37
N/A
N/A

88.37%
N/A
N/A

100%

10,886
10,800
N/A
N/A

99.21%
N/A
N/A

7.10

85.15%

10,771

98.94%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.12

1.50%

267

2.45%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.09

1.11%

27

0.25%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.09

1.10%

86

0.79%

0.17
0.66
1.37

2.09%
7.96%
16.43%

95
1,289
4,041

0.87%
11.84%
37.12%

0.72

8.68%

2,337

21.47%

0.26

3.07%

848

7.79%

0.01

0.07%

60

0.55%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.68

32.14%

2,667

24.50%

3.89

46.67%

6,995

64.26%

0.80

9.62%

1,247

11.46%

PAGE 4-18
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

100%

Human-Caused Hazards

Natural Hazards

Threat
Severe Weather: Weather Risk
Index (Very High)
Severe Weather: Ice Events (1 to 2
Events) 15
Severe Weather: Ice Events (2 to 3
Events)
Severe Weather: Ice Events (More
than 3 Events)
Severe Weather: Winter Storm (0
to 1 Event) 16
Severe Weather: Winter Storm (1
to 3 Events)
Severe Weather: Winter Storm (3
to 10 Events)
Severe Weather: Winter Storm (10
to 20 Events)
Severe Weather: Wind Event
South 17
Severe Weather: Wind Event
East 18
Tsunami 19
Volcano 20
Wildfire: (High Risk Probability) 21
Wildfire: (Very High-Risk
Probability)
Civil Unrest 22
Cyber 23
Dam Failure: Dam Hazard 24
Epidemic and Pandemic 25
Hazardous Materials: NPMS
Pipelines 26
Hazardous Materials: NPMS
Tanks 27
Hazardous Materials: Tier II Sites 28
Transportation Accidents:
Railroads 29
Terrorism and Extremism 30

Area (Sq Mi)

Parcels

Total

% Base

Total

% Base

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

7.38

88.42%

10,886

100.00%

0.00

0.02%

1

0.01%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

7.38

88.43%

10,886

100.00%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4.92

58.94%

6,581

60.45%

0.36

4.34%

620

5.70%

0.09
N/A
0.04

1.06%
N/A
0.48%

91
N/A
37

0.84%
N/A
0.34%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

8.34
8.34
1.46
8.34

100%
100%
17.48%
100%

10,886
10,886
858
10,886

100%
100%
7.88%
100%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.10

1.17%

133

1.22%

3.45

41.35%

4,568

41.96%

8.34

100%

10,886

100%

PAGE 4-19
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Population Exposure
Table 4-2 Vulnerability Analysis: Population Exposure for General and Special Populations 31 32

Special Populations

Population
Threat

Natural Hazards

Base

Drought:
Moderate 33
Drought: Severe
Earthquake:
Tacoma Fault 34
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (Very
Low) 35
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (Very
Low to Low)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction
(Low)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (Low
to Moderate)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction
(Moderate)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction
(Moderate to
High)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction
(High)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Bedrock)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Peat)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Ice)

(of the total exposed population)

(total exposed population)
2020
Total
33,082

65+ Years

<18 Years

% Base

#

% Base

#

% Base

100%

6,727

19.9%

7,162

21.18%

100%

2025
Total
33,809

33,082

100%

33,809

100%

6,727

19.90%

7,162

21.18%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

19,594

59.23%

20,057

59.32%

3,930

11.62%

4,346

12.85%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3,957

11.96%

3,945

11.67%

908

2.69%

614

1.82%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

% Base

PAGE 4-20
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Special Populations

Population

Natural Hazards

Threat

Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Water)
Flood: Flood
Zone 36
Landslide: Deep 37
Landslide:
Shallow 38
Landslide: Steep
Slopes
(Moderate) 39
Landslide: Steep
Slopes (High)
Landslide: Steep
Slopes (Very High)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Very
Low) 40
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Relatively
Low)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Relatively
Moderate)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Relatively
High)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Very High)
Severe Weather:
Ice Events (1 to 2
Events) 41
Severe Weather:
Ice Events (2 to 3
Events)

(of the total exposed population)

(total exposed population)

65+ Years

<18 Years

2020
Total

% Base

2025
Total

% Base

#

% Base

#

% Base

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

10,316

31.18%

10,338

30.58%

2,344

6.93%

1,989

5.88%

13,258

40.08%

13,250

39.19%

2,786

8.24%

2,780

8.22%

24,110

72.88%

24,556

72.63%

4,710

13.93%

5,300

15.68%

1,745

5.27%

1,732

5.12%

457

1.35%

375

1.11%

25,727

77.77%

26,844

79.40%

4,578

13.54%

5,864

17.34%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

14,922

45.11%

15,262

45.14%

3,112

9.20%

3,305

9.78%

3,393

10.26%

3,374

9.98%

759

2.24%

765

2.26%

4,313

13.04%

4,573

13.53%

630

1.86%

1,035

3.06%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

27,090

81.89%

27,848

82.37%

5,402

15.98%

6,019

17.80%

1,373

4.15%

1,436

4.25%

363

1.07%

259

0.77%

PAGE 4-21
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Special Populations

Population

Human-Caused Hazards

Natural Hazards

Threat

Severe Weather:
Ice Events (More
than 3 Events)
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (0
to 1 Event) 42
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (1
to 3 Events)
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (3
to 10 Events)
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (10
to 20 Events)
Severe Weather:
Wind Event
South 43
Severe Weather:
Wind Event East 44
Tsunami 45
Volcano 46
Wildfire: (High
Risk Probability) 47
Wildfire: (Very
High-Risk
Probability)
Civil Unrest 48
Cyber 49
Dam Failure: Dam
Hazard 50
Epidemic and
Pandemic 51
Hazardous
Materials: NPMS
Pipelines 52
Hazardous
Materials: NPMS
Tanks 53

(of the total exposed population)

(total exposed population)

65+ Years

<18 Years

2020
Total

% Base

2025
Total

% Base

#

% Base

#

% Base

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

23,551

71.19%

24,001

70.99%

4,838

14.31%

4,960

14.67%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

21,491

64.96%

22,040

65.19%

3,918

11.59%

4,888

14.46%

1,304

3.94%

1,308

3.87%

237

0.70%

339

1.00%

4,034
N/A

12.19%
N/A

4,111
N/A

12.16%
N/A

770
N/A

2.28%
N/A

957
N/A

2.83%
N/A

9,372

28.33%

9,481

28.04%

1,959

5.79%

2,103

6.22%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

33,082
33,082

100%
100%

33,809
33,809

100%
100%

6,727
6,727

19.90%
19.90%

7,162
7,162

21.18%
21.18%

9,524

28.79%

9,725

28.77%

2,213

6.55%

1,749

5.17%

33,082

100%

33,809

100%

6,727

19.90%

7,162

21.18%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

PAGE 4-22
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Special Populations

Population
Threat

Hazardous
Materials: Tier II
Sites 54
Transportation
Accidents:
Railroads 55
Terrorism and
Extremism 56

(of the total exposed population)

(total exposed population)

65+ Years

<18 Years

2020
Total

% Base

2025
Total

% Base

#

% Base

#

% Base

6,499

19.65%

6,751

19.97%

926

2.74%

1,730

5.12%

14,741

44.56%

15,010

44.40%

2,630

7.78%

3,291

9.73%

33,082

100%

33,809

100%

6,727

19.90%

7,162

21.18%

PAGE 4-23
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

General Infrastructure Exposure
General Infrastructure Exposure to Natural Hazards
Table 4-3 Vulnerability Analysis: General Infrastructure Exposure to Natural Hazards 57 58

Land Value

Natural Hazards

Threat
Base
Drought:
Moderate 59
Drought: Severe
Earthquake:
Tacoma Fault 60
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (Very
Low) 61
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (Very
Low to Low)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (Low)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (Low
to Moderate)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction
(Moderate)

Improved Value

Total Assessed Value

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value
($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

$3,760,729,200

$345,465

100%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100%

$8,069,450,500

$741,269

100%

$3,704,776,600

$343,034.87

98.51%

$4,273,999,900

$395,741

99.19%

$7,978,776,500

$738,775.60

98.88%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$3,734,934,000

$346,758.33

99.31%

$4,288,748,300

$398,175

99.54%

$8,023,682,300

$744,933.83

99.43%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$169,810,000

$635,992.51

4.52%

$138,963,700

$520,463

3.23%

$308,773,700

$1,156,455.81

3.83%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

PAGE 4-24
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Land Value

Natural Hazards

Threat
Base
Earthquake:
Liquefaction
(Moderate to
High)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (High)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Bedrock)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Peat)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Ice)
Earthquake:
Liquefaction (N/A
Water)
Flood: Flood
Zone 62
Landslide: Deep 63
Landslide:
Shallow 64
Landslide: Steep
Slopes
(Moderate) 65
Landslide: Steep
Slopes (High)

Improved Value

Total Assessed Value

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value
($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

$3,760,729,200

$345,465

100%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100%

$8,069,450,500

$741,269

100%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$196,213,900

$7,267,181.48

5.22%

$106,164,100

$3,932,004

2.46%

$302,378,000

$11,199,185.19

3.75%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$350,392,800

$4,074,334.88

9.32%

$147,923,500

$1,720,041

3.43%

$498,316,300

$5,794,375.58

6.18%

$91,915,100

$967,527.37

2.44%

$69,125,000

$727,632

1.60%

$161,040,100

$1,695,158.95

2.00%

$733,625,200

$569,142.90

19.51%

$664,699,200

$515,670

15.43%

$1,398,324,400

$1,084,813.34

17.33%

$1,833,145,900

$453,636.70

48.74%

$2,192,766,800

$542,630

50.89%

$4,025,912,700

$996,266.44

49.89%

$1,130,361,200

$483,680.45

30.06%

$1,216,658,900

$520,607

28.24%

$2,347,020,100

$1,004,287.59

29.09%

$567,000,000

$668,632.08

15.08%

$620,494,700

$731,715

14.40%

$1,187,494,700

$1,400,347.52

14.72%

PAGE 4-25
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Land Value

Natural Hazards

Threat
Base
Landslide: Steep
Slopes (Very High)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Very Low) 66
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Relatively
Low)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Relatively
Moderate)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Relatively
High)
Severe Weather:
Weather Risk
Index (Very High)
Severe Weather:
Ice Events (1 to 2
Events) 67
Severe Weather:
Ice Events (2 to 3
Events)
Severe Weather:
Ice Events (More
than 3 Events)

Improved Value

Total Assessed Value

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value
($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

$3,760,729,200

$345,465

100%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100%

$8,069,450,500

$741,269

100%

$92,427,000

$1,540,450.00

2.46%

$66,057,400

$1,100,957

1.53%

$158,484,400

$2,641,406.67

1.96%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$883,636,800

$331,322.38

23.50%

$961,415,100

$360,486

22.31%

$1,845,051,900

$691,807.99

22.86%

$2,511,203,000

$358,999.71

66.77%

$2,795,492,000

$399,641

64.88%

$5,306,695,000

$758,641.17

65.76%

$498,558,300

$399,806.17

13.26%

$621,450,900

$498,357

14.42%

$1,120,009,200

$898,162.95

13.88%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$3,760,729,200

$345,464.74

100.00%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100.00%

$8,069,450,500

$741,268.65

100.00%

$58,611,400

$58,611,400.00

1.56%

$40,036,000

$40,036,000

0.93%

$98,647,400

$98,647,400.00

1.22%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

PAGE 4-26
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Land Value

Natural Hazards

Threat
Base
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (0 to
1 Event) 68
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (1 to
3 Events)
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (3 to
10 Events)
Severe Weather:
Winter Storm (10
to 20 Events)
Severe Weather:
Wind Event
South 69
Severe Weather:
Wind Event East 70
Tsunami 71
Volcano 72
Wildfire: (High
Risk Probability) 73
Wildfire: (Very
High-Risk
Probability)

Improved Value

Total Assessed Value

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value
($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

$3,760,729,200

$345,465

100%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100%

$8,069,450,500

$741,269

100%

$3,760,729,200

$345,464.74

100.00%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100.00%

$8,069,450,500

$741,268.65

100.00%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$2,553,496,300

$388,010.38

67.90%

$2,690,866,100

$408,884

62.45%

$5,244,362,400

$796,894.45

64.99%

$398,704,000

$643,070.97

10.60%

$276,832,400

$446,504

6.42%

$675,536,400

$1,089,574.84

8.37%

$118,326,800

$1,300,294.51

3.15%

$72,662,600

$798,490

1.69%

$190,989,400

$2,098,784.62

2.37%

$132,411,700

$3,578,694.59

3.52%

$65,771,100

$1,777,597

1.53%

$198,182,800

$5,356,291.89

2.46%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

PAGE 4-27
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

General Infrastructure Exposure to Human - Caused Hazards
Table 4-4 Vulnerability Analysis: General Infrastructure Exposure to Human-Caused Hazards 74 75

Land Value

Human-Caused Hazards

Threat
Base
Civil Unrest 76
Cyber 77
Dam Failure: Dam
Hazard 78
Epidemic and
Pandemic 79
Hazardous Materials:
NPMS Pipelines 80
Hazardous Materials:
NPMS Tanks 81
Hazardous Materials:
Tier II Sites 82
Transportation
Accidents: Railroads 83
Terrorism and
Extremism 84

Improved Value

Total Assessed Value

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value
($)

% Base

Total ($)

Avg. Value ($)

% Base

$3,760,729,200
$3,760,729,200
$3,760,729,200

$345,465
$345,465
$345,465

100%
100%
100%

$4,308,721,300
$4,308,721,300
$4,308,721,300

$395,804
$395,804
$395,804

100%
100%
100%

$8,069,450,500
$8,069,450,500
$8,069,450,500

$741,269
$741,269
$741,269

100%
100%
100%

$379,602,600

$442,427.27

10.09%

$350,871,300

$408,941

8.14%

$730,473,900

$851,368.18

9.05%

$3,760,729,200

$345,465

100%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100%

$8,069,450,500

$741,269

100%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$138,081,800

$1,038,209.02

3.67%

$168,615,100

$1,267,783

3.91%

$306,696,900

$2,305,991.73

3.80%

$1,722,896,200

$377,166.42

45.81%

$1,612,591,200

$353,019

37.43%

$3,335,487,400

$730,185.51

41.33%

$3,760,729,200

$345,465

100%

$4,308,721,300

$395,804

100%

$8,069,450,500

$741,269

100%

PAGE 4-28
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Consequence Analysis
Table 4-5 Natural Hazards Consequence Analysis

Natural Hazards Consequence Analysis
Hazard (Threat)

Drought

Earthquake

Flood

Landslide

Severe Weather

Consequence

Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction

Yes or No

PAGE 4-29
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Natural Hazards Consequence Analysis
Hazard (Threat)

Tsunami and Seiche

Volcano and Lahar

Wildfire

Consequence

Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction

Yes or No

PAGE 4-30
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No

Table 4-6 Human-Caused Hazards Consequence Analysis

Human-Caused Hazards Consequence Analysis
Hazard (Threat)

Civil Unrest

Cyber

Dam Failure

Epidemic and
Pandemic

Hazardous Materials
and Transportation
Accidents

Terrorism and
Extremism

Consequence

Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction
Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction
Impact to the Public
Impact to the Responders
Impact to COG and/or COOP in the Jurisdiction

Yes or No

PAGE 4-31
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Human-Caused Hazards Consequence Analysis
Hazard (Threat)

Consequence

Impact to Property, Facilities and Infrastructure
Impact to the Environment
Impact to the Jurisdiction Economic Condition
Impact to Reputation or Confidence in Jurisdiction

Yes or No

PAGE 4-32
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Maps

PAGE 4-33
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-1 Earthquake Liquefaction Risk

1

PAGE 4-34
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

2

Map 4-2 Flood Risk

PAGE 4-35
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

3

Map 4-3 Deep Landslide Risk

PAGE 4-36
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-4 Shallow Landslide Risk

4

PAGE 4-37
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-5 Slope Stability Risk

5

PAGE 4-38
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-6 Severe Weather Risk

6

PAGE 4-39
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-7 Wind Event East Risk

7

PAGE 4-40
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

8

Map 4-8 Wind Event South Risk

PAGE 4-41
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-9 Tsunami and Seiche Risk

9

PAGE 4-42
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-10 Volcano and Lahar Risk

10

PAGE 4-43
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-11 Wildfire Risk

11

PAGE 4-44
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-12 Hazardous Materials Risk

12

PAGE 4-45
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-13 Pipelines Risk

13

PAGE 4-46
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Map 4-14 Railroad Risk

14

PAGE 4-47
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE 4-48
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Endnotes
FEMA Region X. (2017, January). FEMA Region X – Pierce County, Washington Risk Report.
USGS. (n.d.). What a Landslide and What Causes One? https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-a-landslide-and-whatcauses-one?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products
3
Gonzalez, Frank I., et al. (2003). Puget Sound Tsunami Sources: 2002 Workshop Report. NOAA/Pacific Marine
environmental Laboratory, Contribution No. 2526, 2003. p. 9-14.
4
Washington State Emergency Management Division (WA EMD). (2002, September 5). Modified from Washington
State Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (DRAFT), Tsunami Section.
5
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
6
Washington State OFM, Forecasting and Research Division. (2025). Population and Housing Estimates Spatial
Data.
7
National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2025). U.S. Drought Monitor Spatial Data.
8
Washington Geological Survey. (2025). Earthquakes and Faults Database.
9
Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Pierce County Planning and Public Works (PPW). (2007).
Liquefaction Susceptibility Data.
10
Pierce County PPW, Surface Water Management Division (SWM). (2024). FEMA Floodway Spatial Data.
11
Washington Geological Survey and Pierce County PPW. (2018). Landslide Deep Susceptibility Spatial Data.
12
Washington Geological Survey and Pierce County PPW. (2017). Landslide Shallow Susceptibility Spatial Data.
13
Pierce County PPW and ESRI. (2025). Steep Slopes Spatial Data.
14
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Risk Index Spatial Data.
15
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Ice Events Spatial Data.
16
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Winter Weather Spatial Data.
17
Pierce County PPW. (2002). Wind Event South Spatial Data.
18
Pierce County PPW. (2002). Wind Event East Spatial Data.
19
Washington Geological Survey. (2025). Tsunami Hazard Spatial Data.
20
Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources. (2016). Volcanic Hazards Spatial Data Adapted from U.S.
Geological Survey.
21
Pierce County Spatial Services and PCDEM. (2025). Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Potential Hazard
Areas Spatial Data.
22
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
23
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
24
Washington State DOE. (2025). Dam Hazards Spatial Data.
25
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
1
2

PAGE 4-49
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
26
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2015). National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Spatial Data.
27
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pierce County Spatial Services, and Williams Pipeline CO. (2025). The
National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Plants and Break Out Tank (BOT) Spatial Data.
28
Washington State DOE. (2025). Tier Two Annual Report of Hazardous Chemicals and Extremely Hazardous
Substances Spatial Data.
29
Pierce County PPW and U.S. Department of Transportation. (2010). Railroads Spatial Data.
30
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
31
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
32
Washington State OFM, Forecasting and Research Division. (2025). Population and Housing Estimates Spatial
Data.
33
National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2025). U.S. Drought Monitor Spatial Data.
34
Washington Geological Survey. (2025). Earthquakes and Faults Database.
35
Washington DNR and Pierce County PPW. (2007). Liquefaction Susceptibility Data.
36
Pierce County PPW, SWM Division. (2024). FEMA Floodway Spatial Data.
37
Washington Geological Survey and Pierce County PPW. (2018). Landslide Deep Susceptibility Spatial Data.
38
Washington Geological Survey and Pierce County PPW. (2017). Landslide Shallow Susceptibility Spatial Data.
39
Pierce County PPW and ESRI. (2025). Steep Slopes Spatial Data.
40
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Risk Index Spatial Data.
41
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Ice Events Spatial Data.
42
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Winter Weather Spatial Data.
43
Pierce County PPW. (2002). Wind Event South Spatial Data.
44
Pierce County PPW. (2002). Wind Event East Spatial Data.
45
Washington Geological Survey. (2025). Tsunami Hazard Spatial Data.
46
Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources. (2016). Volcanic Hazards Spatial Data Adapted from U.S.
Geological Survey.
47
Pierce County Spatial Services and Pierce County Department of Emergency Management, 2025 Community
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Potential Hazard Areas Spatial Data.
48
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
49
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
50
Washington State DOE. (2025). Dam Hazards Spatial Data.
51
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6

PAGE 4-50
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2015). National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Spatial Data.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pierce County Spatial Services, and Williams Pipeline CO. (2025). The
National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Plants and Break Out Tank (BOT) Spatial Data.
54
Washington State DOE. (2025). Tier Two Annual Report of Hazardous Chemicals and Extremely Hazardous
Substances Spatial Data.
55
Pierce County PPW and U.S. Department of Transportation. (2010). Railroads Spatial Data.
56
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
57
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
58
Washington State OFM, Forecasting and Research Division. (2025). Population and Housing Estimates Spatial
Data.
59
National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2025). U.S. Drought Monitor Spatial Data.
60
Washington Geological Survey. (2025). Earthquakes and Faults Database.
61
Washington DNR and Pierce County PPW. (2007). Liquefaction Susceptibility Data.
62
Pierce County PPW, SWM Division. (2024). FEMA Floodway Spatial Data.
63
Washington Geological Survey and Pierce County PPW. (2018). Landslide Deep Susceptibility Spatial Data.
64
Washington Geological Survey and Pierce County PPW. (2017). Landslide Shallow Susceptibility Spatial Data.
65
Pierce County PPW and ESRI. (2025). Steep Slopes Spatial Data.
66
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Risk Index Spatial Data.
67
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Ice Events Spatial Data.
68
FEMA and ESRI. (2025). FEMA National Risk Index Severe Weather Winter Weather Spatial Data.
69
Pierce County PPW. (2002). Wind Event South Spatial Data.
70
Pierce County PPW. (2002). Wind Event East Spatial Data.
71
Washington Geological Survey. (2025). Tsunami Hazard Spatial Data.
72
Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources. (2016). Volcanic Hazards Spatial Data Adapted from U.S.
Geological Survey.
73
Pierce County Spatial Services and Pierce County Department of Emergency Management, 2025 Community
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Potential Hazard Areas Spatial Data.
74
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
75
Washington State OFM, Forecasting and Research Division. (2025). Population and Housing Estimates Spatial
Data.
76
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
77
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
52
53

PAGE 4-51
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Washington State DOE. (2025). Dam Hazards Spatial Data.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
80
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2015). National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Spatial Data.
81
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pierce County Spatial Services, and Williams Pipeline CO. (2025). The
National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Plants and Break Out Tank (BOT) Spatial Data.
82
Washington State (DOE). (2025). Tier Two Annual Report of Hazardous Chemicals and Extremely Hazardous
Substances Spatial Data.
83
Pierce County PPW and U.S. Department of Transportation. (2010). Railroads Spatial Data.
84
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics information about total
population counts by sex, age, and race groups for Nation, State, County, Census Tract, Block Group in the United
States and Puerto Rico Spatial Data. USA 2020 Census Population Characteristics.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ebeb65deb5c14f4d8849fd68944b7ee6
78
79

PAGE 4-52
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 - 2030 UPDATE

Section 5: Mitigation
Strategy

Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Mitigation Strategy Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(i), §201.6(c)(3)(ii), §201.6(c)(3)(iii), and §201.6(c)(3)(iv).
This plan must include:
(3) A mitigation strategy that provides the jurisdiction's blueprint for reducing the potential
losses identified in the risk assessment, based on existing authorities, policies, programs
and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools. This section
must include:
(i) A description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to
the identified hazards.
(ii) A section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific
mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each
hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure.
All plans approved by FEMA after October 1, 2008, must also address the
jurisdiction's participation in the NFIP, and continued compliance with NFIP
requirements, as appropriate.
(iii)An action plan describing how the actions identified in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this
section will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the local jurisdiction.
Prioritization will include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are
maximized according to a cost benefit review of the proposed projects and their
associated costs.
(iv) For multi-jurisdictional plans, there must be identifiable action items specific to
the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or credit of the plan.

PAGE 5-1
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 5: Mitigation Strategy
Requirements
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE 5-2
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table of Contents
Mitigation Strategy Requirements ...................................................................................................... 1
Mitigation Strategy Overview .............................................................................................................. 4
Mitigation Strategy: Narrative Description ....................................................................................... 12
Endnotes ............................................................................................................................................ 48

PAGE 5-3
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Mitigation Strategy Overview
Mitigation actions are short-term and long-term actions to reduce risk to a hazard incident (see
City of University Place, Section 4: Risk Assessment for the full hazard list). The process of
developing and implementing these mitigation actions relies upon a community’s risks and
vulnerabilities, their Planning Discipline Group’s local expertise, public participation, each
community’s needs and capabilities, a cost/benefit review, and input from the governing elected
officials.
Figure 1-1 Mitigation Strategy Formula

The Pierce County RHMP defines each Jurisdictional Annex’s Mitigation Strategy (see Figure 1-1) as
a being the combination of Pierce County Mitigation Goals, Pierce County Mitigation Objectives,
Local Mitigation Goals, and Mitigation Actions (see Table 5-1).

PAGE 5-4
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 5-1 Critical Mitigation Strategy Definitions

Mitigation Strategy Definitions
Jurisdictional Annex – Mitigation Strategy
Each Jurisdictional Annex identifies:

Mitigation Strategy

•
•
•
•

Pierce County Mitigation Goals,
Pierce County Mitigation Objectives,
Local Mitigation Goals, and
Mitigation Actions.

Combined, these four elements create the jurisdiction’s overall
mitigation strategy – a cohesive strategy to reduce short-term and longterm risk to natural and human-caused hazards.
Base Plan – Mitigation Strategy
The overall Regional Pierce County Mitigation Strategy combines all
Jurisdictional Annex Mitigation Strategies.
Pierce County Mitigation Goals

Pierce County Mitigation
Goals and Objectives

A County-level desired result related to reducing or avoiding short-term
and long-term vulnerability to hazards through mitigation strategies.
Pierce County Mitigation Objectives
Unlike goals, objectives are specific, measurable, and narrower in scope.

Local Mitigation Goal

Mitigation Action

Each jurisdiction’s desired result is related to reducing or avoiding shortterm and long-term vulnerability to hazards through mitigation
strategies.
Mitigation actions are short and long-term ways a community can
reduce risk to a hazard-related incident.

PAGE 5-5
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

The Mitigation Strategy Matrix Table (Table 5-2) is the core of the City of University Place’s
Mitigation Strategy as it consolidates all mitigation actions into a cohesive strategy to reduce
short-term and long-term risk to natural and human-caused hazards. The City of University Place’s
overall mitigation strategy is made up of all their individual mitigation actions put together. Table
5-2 describes the following elements for each mitigation action (see Pierce County RHMP Base
Plan, Section 1: Plan Process for more detail).
•
•
•
•
•

Implementation Mechanism Category: Describes how each mitigation action will be
implemented on the local level.
Mitigation Action and Hazard Type: Identified the natural or human-caused hazards each
mitigation action addresses as defined in the Hazard Code Table (see endnotes).
Lead Jurisdiction/Department: Identifies the entity responsible for completing this action
and tracking its progress.
Timeline: Indicated the estimated duration expected to complete the action.
Plan Goals Addressed: Specifies how many of the Pierce County RHMP Planning Team’s
goals are addressed by this mitigation action.

Mitigation Strategy Matrix Table
Table 5-2 comprises the City of University Place’s Mitigation Strategy and lists all current and past
mitigation actions that address the fourteen natural and human-caused hazards identified in the
City of University Place’s, Section 4: Risk Assessment. Each mitigation action in Table 5-2 is
categorized into groups based on how each action will be implemented on the local level. Table 52 is organized by these categories. These categories are an extension of the City of University
Place’s Mitigation Strategy by organizing actions into implementable categories of mitigation
actions.
•

Completed and Deferred Mitigation Actions: These mitigation actions have been
completed or put on hold in previous updates of the Pierce County RHMP.

These implementation mechanism categories are as follows:
•
•
•

Continued Mitigation Actions: There are three mitigation actions in this category, and they
are the same for every Jurisdictional Annex: “Existing Mitigation Actions,” “Plan
Maintenance,” and the “Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Forum (HMF).”
Organization-Wide Mitigation Actions (City Government): All mitigation actions within this
category fall within the City of University Place’s Jurisdiction to implement on the locallevel.
Public Education Mitigation Actions: Specifically, all mitigation actions within this category
are public education and community engagement oriented.

PAGE 5-6
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Mitigation Strategy Matrix: Goals
The Pierce County RHMP Planning Team synthesized six goals to guide the process of creating and
implementing mitigation actions across Pierce County’s planning partner jurisdictions. Please see
Pierce County RHMP Base Plan, Section 1: Plan Process for more details.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Protect Life and Property, “Life and Property” in Table 5-2.
Ensure Continuity of Operations, “Continuity of Operations” in Table 5-2.
Develop Partnerships for Implementation, “Partnerships” in Table 5-2.
Protect the Environment, “Environment” in Table 5-2.
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters, “Preparedness” in Table 5-2.
Promote a Sustainable Economy, “Sustainable Economy” in Table 5-2.

These goals are broad and address short and long-term policy and vision statements that explain
what should be achieved through a mitigation action upon completion.

Mitigation Strategy Matrix: Timelines
Mitigation action timelines reflect how long these mitigation actions will take to be fully
implemented. In each jurisdiction’s Mitigation Strategy: Narrative Description, all mitigation
actions are categorized as either ongoing, completed, or deferred. In each jurisdiction’s Table 5-2,
mitigation actions are described as ongoing actions, short-term actions, and long-term actions:
•
•
•

Ongoing Actions: These actions are already being implemented by the jurisdiction.
Short-Term Actions: These actions can be implemented with existing resources and
authorities within one to two years.
Long-term Actions: These actions may require new or additional resources or authorities
and may take between one and five years to implement.

Mitigation Strategy Matrix: Prioritization
All mitigation actions in Table 5-2 are prioritized in their order of appearance within each
implementation mechanism category. Furthermore, these priorities are further detailed in the
following Mitigation Strategy: Narrative Description Subsection Please see the Pierce County
RHMP Base Plan, Section 1: Plan Process for more detail.

PAGE 5-7
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 5 - 2 City of University Place Mitigation Strategy Matrix

Continued Strategies

City Government
Strategies

Preparedness

Sustainable
Economy

3 years







Ongoing





2 years





LIDAR Mapping
(V, EQ, L, FL)
Day Island Warning System and Evacuation
Route
(EQ, F, T)
Existing Mitigation Actions
(EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW, HC)
Plan Maintenance
(EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW, HC)
Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Forum
(EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW, HC)
Capability Identification and Evaluation (EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW, HC)
City of University Place Recovery Plan
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)
Critical Facilities – City: Auxiliary Power
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)
Emergency Vehicle Access & Response
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)

Pierce County and USGS
City of University Place: Public
Safety, Development Services,
Public Works
City of University Place
City of University Place
PC DEM; City of University Place

Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing













Environment

City of University Place:
Development Services, FEMA,
USGS

Partnerships

Risk Assessment: Hazard Modeling
(EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW)

Continuity of
Operations

Lead Jurisdiction(s) /
Department(s)

Life and
Property

Completed and
Deferred Strategies

Mitigation Strategy
(Hazard Type)1

Timeline (years)

Implementation
Mechanism
Categories

Plan Goals Addressed


















City of University Place

2 years

N/A

City of University Place

2 years













City of University Place

3 years













City of University Place:
Engineering Services, Public
Works, Police, and Fire District

6 years













PAGE 5-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Shelter Development
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)
Underground Utilities
(EQ, V, SW)
Tree Maintenance Program
(SW)

City Government
Strategies

Other Critical Facilities: Seismic Evaluation
(EQ)
Critical Infrastructure Seismic Evaluations
(Day Island Bridge/South Spit Road/Lower
Chambers Creek Bridge)
(EQ)
Research and Acquire a Satellite Internet
Service
(EQ)
Floodplain Regulation
(FL)
Surface Water Reduction: Control
Standards
(FL)

Pierce County DEM,
Lakewood/West Pierce
Fire/University Place Emergency
Management Interlocal group,
American Red Cross
Local utility providers, City of
university Place: Development
Services, Engineering Services
City of University Place: Public
Works and Parks, Development
Services, Puget Sound Energy
City of University Place:
Engineering Services,
Developmental Services
City of University Place:
Engineering Services,
Development Services, Public
Works

Ongoing



Sustainable
Economy

Preparedness

Environment

Partnerships

Continuity of
Operations

Lead Jurisdiction(s) /
Department(s)

Life and
Property

Mitigation Strategy
(Hazard Type)1

Timeline (years)

Implementation
Mechanism
Categories

Plan Goals Addressed



Longterm
20+







Ongoing











5 years











6 years











City of University Place:
Administrative Services

2 years







City of University Place:
Development Services

Ongoing













City of University Place:
Development Services

Ongoing













PAGE 5-9
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE





Public Education
Strategies

Environment

Preparedness

Sustainable
Economy

City Government
Strategies

Risk Assessment: Landslide Evaluation of
Development
(L)
Coordinate and Maintain Evacuation Route
Planning
(EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW, HC)
Install Satellite Internet Connectivity for
EOC Continuity
(EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW, HC)
Heat Mapping
(SW, WF)
Tree Canopy Mapping
(SW, WF)
Alert and Warning Systems. Keep,
continue, and expand PC-NET and CERT.
Contract for a new emergency notification
system with WPEMC.
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)
Public Education: Hazard Insurance
Information
(EQ, FL, T, V, L)

Partnerships

FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FL)

Continuity of
Operations

Surface Water Reduction: Low Impact
Developments
(FL)

Life and
Property

Mitigation Strategy
(Hazard Type)1

Timeline (years)

Implementation
Mechanism
Categories

Plan Goals Addressed

City of University Place:
Development Services

Pilot













City of University Place:
Development Services, Pierce
County Water Programs

Ongoing













City of University Place:
Development Services

Ongoing













City of University Place

Ongoing

















Lead Jurisdiction(s) /
Department(s)

West Pierce Emergency
Management Coalition, City of
University Place
City of University Place
Development Services Team
City of University Place
Development Services Team

Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing











City of University Place: Public
Safety and PCDEM

1 year













HMPT, Insurance Industry,
PCDEM

1-3
years













PAGE 5-10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Continuity of
Operations

Partnerships

Environment

Preparedness

Sustainable
Economy

Public Education
Strategies

Continue Hazard Related Training for City
Staff and Elected Officials
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)
Create and Publish Hazard Articles in the
City’s E-newsletter
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)
Hazard Related Education/Training for the
Economic Development Community
(EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC)
Earthquake Home Retrofit Program
(EQ)

Lead Jurisdiction(s) /
Department(s)

Life and
Property

Mitigation Strategy
(Hazard Type)1

Timeline (years)

Implementation
Mechanism
Categories

Plan Goals Addressed

City of University Place: Human
Resources

Ongoing













City of University Place: Public
Safety, Communications/I.T.

Ongoing













City of University Place:
Economic Development
Department

1 year













Ongoing













City of University Place

PAGE 5-11
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Mitigation Strategy: Narrative
Description
This subsection describes all the mitigation actions from the Mitigation Strategy Matrix Table
(Table 5-2) in more detail. These actions are organized by implementation mechanism
categories that are an extension of the City of University Place’s Mitigation Strategy by
organizing actions into implementable categories of mitigation actions.
Building upon Table 5-2, each jurisdiction’s mitigation actions are described in more detail in
the Mitigation Strategy: Narrative Description Subsection. Each mitigation action’s narrative
description goes into detail on four components of that mitigation action:
•
•
•
•

Mitigation Action Description: What are all the hazards that this action mitigates, and
how does this mitigation action accomplish mitigating these hazards?
Mitigation Action Status Update: What is the general status update of this action?
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation: How feasible is this mitigation action to implement
with each jurisdictions existing resources?
Mitigation Action Prioritization: What priority is this action in comparison to other
actions in the same implementation mechanism category?

PAGE 5-12
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Completed and Deferred Mitigation Strategies
Risk Assessment: Hazard Modeling
Status Update: Complete
The City of University Place will work with other county jurisdictions and state and local
agencies to model hazard events using existing hazard modeling software. It will provide
updated vulnerability assessments, can be used to evaluate mitigation strategies, and aid
response and recovery efforts. As software becomes available for other hazards it will be
incorporated into the City's risk assessment. Current software includes:
•
•

HAZUS – Used for mapping potential economic impacts of earthquakes, floods and wind
events. Loss estimation data is based on probabilistic hazard scenarios.
LAHARZ – Used for modeling lahar hazards.

Priority: MH-CD-1
Hazards: EQ, L, T, V, D, FL, SW

PAGE 5-13
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

LIDAR Mapping
Status Update: Complete
The City of University Place will utilize LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) mapping as part of
the evaluation and development of its vulnerability assessment. LIDAR improves the accuracy
of topographical maps dramatically and on the Kitsap, Peninsula has revealed the existence of
previously unknown fault scarps. LIDAR mapping can effectively reveal the existence of similar
faults in the University Place area, or conversely, help confirm that they are not present,
improving the City’s ability to assess geologic hazards for both land use management and
emergency management purposes.
The City has contracted with Pierce County to update the LIDAR mapping of the City and is
incorporated into the county’s GIS system.

Priority: MH-CD-2
Hazards: V, EQ, L, FL

PAGE 5-14
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Day Island Warning System and Evacuation Route
Status Update: Complete
Day Island and Sunset Beach are areas with limited access and homes located within the 100year flood plain. Residents will be encouraged to download CodeRed, the City’s emergency
messaging system to provide warnings and alerts, if possible. Residents will also be encouraged
to form their own PC-NET. Working with public safety the City will establish evacuation route
for residents of Day Island.

Priority: MH-CD-3
Hazards: EQ, FL, T

PAGE 5-15
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Continued Mitigation Strategies
Existing Mitigation Actions
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will integrate the hazard mitigation plan into existing plans,
ordinances, and programs to dictate land uses within the jurisdiction. Further, University Place
will continue to implement existing programs, policies, and regulations as identified in Section
3: Capability Identification of this Jurisdictional Annex. This includes such actions as updating
the Critical Area Regulations and any ensuing land use policies with best available science. It
also includes continuing those programs that are identified as technical capabilities.

Priority: MH-C-1
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Promote A Sustainable Economy; Ensure
Continuity of Operations; Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; Preserve or
Restore Natural Resources; and Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for
Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = Existing Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-Wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-16
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Plan Maintenance
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will adopt those processes outlined in Section 7: Plan Maintenance
of this Jurisdictional Annex.

Priority: MH-C-2
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations; and
Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Existing Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-17
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Forum
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place attends the Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Forum (HMF), which is
coordinated by Pierce County’s Department of Emergency Management. The HMF continues to
meet annually as a way to coordinate mitigation planning efforts among all jurisdictions within
Pierce County that have completed a Jurisdictional Annex to the Pierce County Regional Hazard
Mitigation Plan. This ensures efficient use of resources and a more cooperative approach to
making a disaster-resilient county.
During the HMF annual meeting, planning partners can discuss the previous year’s hazard
incidents from the perspective of the disaster cycle and how it relates to mitigation planning:
mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Furthermore, the HMF is an opportunity for
planning partners to discuss new project coordination, new mitigation strategy creation, and
new mitigation best practices. For flood, severe weather, and landslide hazards in Pierce
County, planning partners can discuss how hydrological hazards may have impacted Pierce
County in the last year. Discussing lessons learned from any significant hydrological hazard
incidents is critical for improving Pierce County’s mitigation strategies for flood, severe
weather, and landslide hazards.
Drought and wildfire hazards are also important hazards to discuss each year following the
summer months in Pierce County. Lessons learned from a year’s wildfire season are an
important discussion topic when preparing new mitigation strategies to keep up with increasing
wildfire and wildfire smoke risk in Pierce County. Drought is a chronic hazard that has impacts
throughout every season of the year. While decreased snowpack and decreased levels of
precipitation are negative impacts felt all-year round in Pierce County, is it important to discuss
wildfire risk together with how chronic drought is increasing wildfire frequency and severity in
Washington State. A multi-hazard and multi-jurisdictional forum is a good setting to have this
coordination conversation.
Earthquake, volcano, and tsunami hazards are less frequent in Pierce County than many of the
other natural hazards. However, the annual HMF allows for a conversation on how to improve
mitigation strategies for these geological hazards following the annual October Great Shake Out
Day event. The HMF is addressed in more detail in Section 7: Plan Maintenance of this
Jurisdictional Annex.

Priority: MH-C-3
Hazards: EQ, L, V, D, FL, HC, WF, SW

PAGE 5-18
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Promote A Sustainable Economy; Ensure
Continuity of Operations; Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; Preserve or
Restore Natural Resources; and Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for
Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minor.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = PCDEM; City of University Place.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = Regional-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-19
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

City Government Mitigation Strategies
Capability Identification and Evaluation
Status: Ongoing
The City of University Place will develop a consistent and replicable system for evaluating the
City’s capabilities. A comprehensive evaluation will lead to specific policy recommendations to
achieve disaster resistant communities more effectively. Further, a capability evaluation
involves measurable variables so that capabilities may eventually be tracked in conjunction with
the implementation of all mitigation measures. This is a key component in evaluating the
success of the City’s overall mitigation strategy.
The City is currently reviewing its CEMP and EOP plans in conjunction with the Hazard
Mitigation Plan. Additionally, the City will be partnering with the City of Lakewood, Town of
Steilacoom and West Pierce Fire to conduct an overall capabilities evaluation.

Priority: MH-CG-1
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = N/A. Goals addressed are contingent upon the mitigation strategies
resulting from this priority
2. Cost of Strategy = Existing Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place.
5. Timeline = 2 Years.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-20
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

City of University Place Recovery Plan
Status: Ongoing
The City of University Place will develop a comprehensive Disaster Recovery Plan. This will be a
pre-event plan for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction, composed of policies, plans,
actions and responsibilities. It will include an element of business resumption and long-term
economic sustainability. There will be an emphasis on the integration of mitigation into the
recovery phases after an emergency or disaster.
The City will be working on this with the City of Lakewood, Town of Steilacoom and West Pierce
Fire.

Priority: MH-CG-2
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Promote A Sustainable Economy; Ensure
Continuity of Operations; Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; Preserve or
Restore Natural Resources; and Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for
Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = Existing Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources for the Planning
Process.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget, PDM
and Economic Development Administration (US Chamber of Commerce) grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place.
5. Timeline = 2 Years.
6. Benefit = City of University Place.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-21
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Critical Facilities – City: Auxiliary Power
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will install and/or improve backup power generation capability for
any City-owned critical facility to be operational within 72 hours of an event to maintain
essential functions.
The City’s main emergency is powered via a backup generator for both the Public Works Shop
and the main Civic Building. Current capacity provides lighting and some elevator use. The
City would like to bolster current capacity to provide more equipment usage during an
emergency. Additionally, the City will look for ways to implement traffic light and ADA
crossing battery backup systems at major traffic intersections.

Priority: MH-CG-3
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Promote A Sustainable Economy; Ensure
Continuity of Operations; Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; Preserve or
Restore Natural Resources; and Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for
Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = Cost of Installation and Improvements, Staff Time, and Necessary
Materials.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget, and
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place.
5. Timeline = 3 Years.
6. Benefit = Facility Specific, City-Wide Services.
7. Life of Strategy = Life of Unit.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-22
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Emergency Vehicle Access & Response
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place has some street ends that can be made into through streets. In
some cases, this lack of connection significantly increases emergency vehicle response times
and limits the ability to access areas if existing accesses are blocked by fire, congestion or
debris. Working with the Police Department and the Fire District, the City’s Public Works
Department has identified and prioritized these connections.

Priority: MH-CG-4
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Promote A Sustainable Economy; Ensure
Continuity of Operations; Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; Preserve or
Restore Natural Resources; and Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for
Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = Necessary Construction Costs, Materials, and Equipment.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget, and
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Engineering Services, Public Works, Police,
and Fire District.
5. Timeline = 6 Years.
6. Benefit = City-Wide Services.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-23
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Shelter Development
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will continue to incorporate designated shelters into the Critical
Facility Section of this Plan.
As a potential receiving location for any emergency event, but with special emphasis on lahar,
earthquake, or flooding, the City will continue to work to identify potential sheltering facilities
within the community for both short-term and long-term options. The city also now has a
shelter trailer that it will maintain and purchase supplies for.

Priority: MH-CG-5
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Promote A Sustainable Economy; Establish and Strengthen
Partnerships for Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minor.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget, and
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = Pierce County Department of Emergency Management,
Lakewood/West Pierce Fire/University Place Emergency Management Interlocal Group,
and American Red Cross.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = Facility Specific, City-Wide Services.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by the entire community.

PAGE 5-24
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Underground Utilities
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will encourage the placement of all utilities (i.e., power lines)
underground. This will limit the potential damage to infrastructure as well as damage the
infrastructure could cause to life and property. Where not economically feasible for the utility
provider, homeowners could have the option to have their utilities placed underground
through an individualized rate structure.

Priority: MH-CG-6
Hazards: EQ, V, SW
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Promote A Sustainable Economy; Establish and Strengthen
Partnerships for Implementation; Preserve or Restore Natural Resources; and Promote a
Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Expensive.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget, grants,
or utility companies.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = Local utility providers, City of University Place: Development
Services and Engineering Services.
5. Timeline = Long-Term 20+ Years.
6. Benefit = City of University Place; Tacoma Public Utilities.
7. Life of Strategy = Varies.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-25
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Tree Maintenance Program
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place conducts windshield surveys of trees along City streets and
properties during daily maintenance operations to identify signs of distress and potential safety
hazards. The City evaluates the health and safety of any tree identified in this manner as well as
any tree reported by the public as a concern. Trees that are dead, diseased, dying, or otherwise
present a safety concern are removed or trimmed as needed. The City may expand the program
to work with gardening centers, Master Gardeners, and the Extension Service to develop a
continuing program to assist the public with preventing storm damage through the proper use
of vegetation and trimming of dangerous limbs.

Priority: SW-CG-7
Hazards: SW
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Establish and Strengthen Partnerships
for Implementation; Preserve or Restore Natural Resources; Increase Public
Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = The Cost of Staff Time, Materials, and Equipment.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place; Public Works and Parks, Development
Services, and Puget Sound Energy.
5. Timeline = Long-Term 20+ Years.
6. Benefit = City-Wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Varies.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-26
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Other Critical Facilities: Seismic Evaluation
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will evaluate City-owned critical facilities not meeting current code
to determine their earthquake structural integrity. This requires preparation of information to
allow budgeting for renovation of those facilities that are not up to current code or have
structural deficiencies that have developed over the years. Two of the City’s bridges have been
identified as structurally deficient (the Day Island bridge and the Lower Chambers Creek
bridge). Replacement or retrofitting of these bridges will be necessary to bring them up to
current standards. A design study may be needed for each bridge to determine the feasibility
and best course of action for these replacements/retrofits.

Priority: EQ-CG-8
Hazards: EQ
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Establish and Strengthen Partnerships
for Implementation; Preserve or Restore Natural Resources; Increase Public
Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Expensive.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Engineering Services and Development
Services.
5. Timeline = 5 Years.
6. Benefit = Facility Specific, City-Wide Services.
7. Life of Strategy = Life of undamaged/unaltered structure.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-27
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Non-Structural Retrofitting for Remodel Projects
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will evaluate nonstructural seismic retrofitting of city facilities,
structures and equipment.

Priority: EQ-CG-9
Hazards: EQ
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Establish and Strengthen Partnerships
for Implementation; Preserve or Restore Natural Resources; Increase Public
Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Retrofitting Construction and Permitting Costs.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Engineering Services, Developmental
Services, and Public Works.
5. Timeline = 5 Years.
6. Benefit = City of University Place.
7. Life of Strategy = Life of nonstructural action.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be endorsed by the entire community.

PAGE 5-28
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Other Critical Facilities: Seismic Evaluation
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will encourage owners of other critical facilities in the City to
evaluate their critical facilities not meeting current code to determine its earthquake structural
integrity. This may require preparation of information on how to renovate of those facilities
that are not up to current code or have structural deficiencies that have developed over the
years.

Priority: EQ-CG-10
Hazards: EQ
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Establish and Strengthen Partnerships
for Implementation; Preserve or Restore Natural Resources; Increase Public
Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Structural Integrity Evaluation Costs.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Engineering Services, Development
Services, and Public Works.
5. Timeline = 5 Years.
6. Benefit = Facility Specific, City-Wide Services.
7. Life of Strategy = Life of undamaged/unaltered structure.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be endorsed by the entire community.

PAGE 5-29
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Critical Infrastructure Seismic Evaluations (Day Island
Bridge/Lower Chambers Creek Bridge)
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will evaluate and conduct evaluations related to current code to
determine earthquake structural integrity. This may require preparation of information on how
to renovate of those facilities that are not up to current code or have structural deficiencies
that have developed over the years.

Priority: EQ-CG-11
Hazards: EQ
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Establish and Strengthen Partnerships
for Implementation; Preserve or Restore Natural Resources; Increase Public
Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minor.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Engineering Services, Development
Services, and Public Works.
5. Timeline = 2 Years.
6. Benefit = Day Island.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-30
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Acquire Internet Satellite Service
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will research and purchase a satellite internet service for use by the
City and community during emergencies.

Priority: EQ-CG-12
Hazards: EQ
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations; and
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time and Equipment.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place.
5. Timeline = Short-term.
6. Benefit = City-Wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = the proposal is likely to be endorsed by the entire community.

PAGE 5-31
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Floodplain Regulation
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will continue to administer UPMC 14.15 Flood Damage
Prevention and UPMC 17.30 Flood Hazard Areas, which regulate all development in regulated
floodplains in accordance with the National Flood Insurance programs. This will reduce
likelihood of flood damage to new businesses and homes and associated property value
losses. Properties with repeat flooding damages will be evaluated for land purchase
mitigation. Review upgrades to Day Island South Spit road to mitigate repeated flooding.

Priority: FL-CG-13
Hazards: FL
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants. Funding could be obtained through a federal or state mitigation grant.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place Developmental Services.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual (contingent upon FIRM updates and Comprehensive Plan
review schedule).
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-32
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Surface Water Reduction: Control Standards
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will enforce stormwater control standards for new development.
This will help to reduce peak flow impacts commonly associated with increased impervious
cover.
The City has adopted both the King County Surface Water Design Manual and the Department
of Ecology stormwater manual as standards for controlling development run-off.

Priority: FL-CG-14
Hazards: FL
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minor.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place Developmental Services.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Ongoing.
8. Community Reaction = the proposal would be endorsed by the entire community.

PAGE 5-33
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Surface Water Reduction: Low Impact Developments
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place has adopted Low-Impact Development Standards and encourages
Low-Impact Development for all developments in the City. This will help to reduce peak flow
impacts commonly associated with increased impervious cover.

Priority: FL-CG-15
Hazards: FL
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place Developmental Services.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide
7. Life of Strategy = Pilot.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be endorsed by the entire community.

PAGE 5-34
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place has adopted the updated Flood Insurance Study and Flood
Insurance Rate Maps. The City will continue to adopt the latest versions of these studies and
maps as new information becomes available. This leads to more accurate floodplain regulations
and an opportunity to increase public awareness.
In February of 2017 the City adopted revisions to UMPC 14.15 (Flood Damage Protection) and
UMPC 17.30 (Flood Hazard Areas). In these revisions, the City adopted the latest versions of the
Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps and updated our regulations for
consistency with CFR 44.59.60.3(d, e).

Priority: FL-CG-16
Hazards: FL
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place Developmental Services.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Pilot.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be endorsed by the entire community.

PAGE 5-35
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Risk Assessment: Landslide Evaluation of Development
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place has adopted Low-Impact Development Standards and encourages
Low-Impact Development for all developments in the City. This will help to reduce peak flow
impacts commonly associated with increased impervious cover.

Priority: LS-CG-17
Hazards: LS
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time, Materials, and Other Risk Assessment Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place Developmental Services.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-36
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Coordinate and Maintain Evacuation Route Planning
Status Update: Ongoing
Collaborate with local police departments, public works, and West Pierce Fire and Rescue to
plan, map, and update possible evacuation routes for a variety of hazards. This measure aims to
ensure safe, timely, and organized evacuations. This plan may not be published due to how
quickly evacuation routes can change based on the incident. Community members should
follow directions from local law enforcement during a time of evacuations.
The benefit of this plan is that it gives the fire department, local law enforcement, and public
works a framework for how evacuations will work in certain incidents. Although routes will
need to be flexible, it gives agencies an idea of how to ensure safe, timely, and organized
evacuations. It also gives a protocol to follow during trainings to ensure that the plan is
effective. Recognizing that University Place has communities like Day Island and Sunset Beach
that may need to evacuate quickly, we can create a plan for how the city will notify residents
and how agencies like the fire department, law enforcement, and public works can work
together to identify those routes quickly.
*Note that this mitigation measure does not ensure pre-identified evacuation routes but rather
how these entities will work together, and best practices for the city to notify residents.

Priority: MH-CG-18
Hazards: EQ, L, V, D, FL, HC, WF, SW
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place Developmental Services.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal would be somewhat controversial.

PAGE 5-37
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Install Satellite Internet Connectivity for EOC Continuity
Status Update: Ongoing
Install a satellite-based internet system as a resilient backup communications method at the
main location for University Place’s EOC to ensure operational continuity during disasters that
disrupt communications such as earthquakes, storms, wildfires, and possibly cyberattacks

Priority: MH-CG-19
Hazards: EQ, SW, WF, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Ensure continuity of Operations; Establish and Strengthen
Partnerships for Implementation.
2. Cost of Strategy = System and based on which one is chosen, the monthly subscription
fee.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = West Pierce Emergency Management Coalition and City of
University Place.
5. Timeline = Ongoing to maintain the system once it is acquired.
6. Benefit = This will benefit the Emergency Operations Center by ensuring that even if
connectivity is down, we will be able to maintain critical communications during an
incident. It will give the EOC the opportunity to be able to connect with partners as
needed.
7. Life of Strategy = Until the system needs to be updated.
8. Community Reaction = The community would most likely react positively to this
mitigation measure because it helps the city ensure continuity in an incident where
connectivity might be lost.

PAGE 5-38
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Heat Mapping
Status Update: Ongoing
Work with staff and an outside organization/university to map the heat risk areas within the
city. Initial website mapping shows higher heat impacts on areas of multi-family housing within
the city that have less green space nearby.

Priority: MH-CG-20
Hazards: SW, WF
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Ensure Continuity of Operations; Increase Public Preparedness for
Disasters.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = University Place Development Services Team.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = This will benefit the city by mapping where the largest heat risk areas are
within the city. Once mapping is created, it can help facilitate where we should focus
cooling centers and other potential heat related programs within the city.
7. Life of Strategy = Until the maps need to be updated.
8. Community Reaction = The community would most likely react positively to this
mitigation measure because it helps the city with planning purposes to better serve
their residents.

PAGE 5-39
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Tree Canopy Mapping
Status Update: Ongoing
Index of trees to determine where heat indexing areas can be lowered.

Priority: MH-CG-21
Hazards: SW, WF
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Ensure Continuity of Operations; Increase Public Preparedness for
Disasters; and Preserve or Restore Natural Resources.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget or
grants.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = University Place Development Services Team.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = This will benefit the city by mapping where there is an index of trees within
the city. Once mapping is created, it can help point out where risks exist for urban
wildfire.
7. Life of Strategy = Until the maps need to be updated.
8. Community Reaction = The community would most likely react positively to this
mitigation measure because it helps the city with planning purposes to better serve
their residents.

PAGE 5-40
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Public Education Mitigation Strategies
Continue and Expand PC-NET, CERT, and Alert and Warning
Program in City
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will continue and expand the PC-NET (Pierce County Neighborhood
Emergency Teams), Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) and Alert and Warning in
the City. PCNET and CERT are neighborhood/community-oriented approaches to emergency
preparedness and homeland security. It is based on the belief that a cooperative effort
between a county and its communities is the only sure way to protect a neighborhood and to
prepare for a major disaster.
The program helps individuals, and their neighborhoods prepare to mutually assist each other
so that lives can be saved, property can be spared, and emergency services can be freed to
respond to the most devastated areas. This will be accomplished by organizing block groups
into a variety of disaster response teams, each of which has a simple one-page list that clearly
outlines necessary tasks. No special skills or equipment are required to participate—and only a
minimal time commitment is needed. Such programs are critical to reminding the public of the
hazards in Pierce County, and of the necessity of having on hand the supplies and materials to
survive independently for a minimum of 72 hours. These programs will be continued and
expanded upon. The City will work to enhance their alert and warning program.

Priority: MH-PE-1
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Approximately $7,000.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Public Safety and PCDEM.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide, residents, businesses and regional partners.
7. Life of Strategy = varies.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.
PAGE 5-41
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Public Education: Hazard Insurance Information
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will partner with the WA Office of the Insurance Commissioner
(OIC) to help increase public awareness of natural hazard insurance options and the benefits of
carrying various hazard insurance. This will entail dissemination of an FAQ list regarding hazard
insurance topics including property tax relief following a disaster.

Priority: MH-PE-2
Hazards: EQ, FL, T, V, L
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minor.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be obtained through local budget.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = HMPT, Insurance Industry, and PCDEM.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = varies.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-42
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Public Education: Continue Hazard Related Training for City Staff
and Elected Officials
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will continue the hazard related training for City staff and elected
officials. Classes will involve EOC trainings, NIMS, ACT-20, run/hide/fight, CPR/AED, etc.

Priority: MH-PE-3
Hazards: E, F, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minor.
3. Funding Source and Situation = N/A.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Human Resources.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-43
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Public Education: Create and Publish Hazard Articles in the
City’s E-newsletter
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will create articles to educate the public about a variety of hazards
to be put out in the e-newsletter.
Articles will be drafted to coincide with national and local emergency planning campaigns, the
recency of occurrences within the City, and as time/space allows.

Priority: MH-PE-4
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minimal.
3. Funding Source and Situation = N/A.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Public Safety, Communications/I.T.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Perpetual.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-44
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Public Education: Hazard Related Education/Training for the
Economic Development Community
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will create articles to educate the public about a variety of hazards
to be put out in the e-newsletter.
Articles will be drafted to coincide with national and local emergency planning campaigns, the
recency of occurrences within the City, and as time/space allows.

Priority: MH-PE-5
Hazards: EQ, FL, D, T, V, SW, L, HC
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Minimal.
3. Funding Source and Situation = N/A.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place: Economic Development Department.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = 1 year.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-45
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Public Education: Earthquake Home Retrofit Program
Status Update: Ongoing
The City of University Place will continue to educate its property owners building
contractors, and real property partners on methods to retrofit homes to mitigate damage in
case of an earthquake. The City should encourage the insurance industry to distribute home
retrofit information to owners/occupants of pre-1970 University Place homes, especially
when homeowners are seeking hard to obtain earthquake insurance. This will reduce the
total amount of uninsured damages due to earthquakes. Staff will also review ways to
minimize -City-controlled costs related to those retrofits.

Priority: EQ-PE-6
Hazards: EQ
Eight-Point Feasibility Evaluation
1. Goal(s) Addressed = Protect Life and Property; Ensure Continuity of Operations;
Establish and Strengthen Partnerships for Implementation; Protect the Environment;
Increase Public Preparedness for Disasters; and Promote a Sustainable Economy.
2. Cost of Strategy = Staff Time, Materials, and Other Resources.
3. Funding Source and Situation = Funding could be accomplished with local budgets or
grant funding.
4. Lead Jurisdiction(s) = City of University Place.
5. Timeline = Ongoing.
6. Benefit = City-wide.
7. Life of Strategy = Ongoing.
8. Community Reaction = The proposal is likely to be endorsed by entire community.

PAGE 5-46
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE 5-47
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Endnotes
1

Hazard Codes and Implementation Mechanisms

Hazard
Code

Hazard Name

Implementation
Mechanism Code

Implementation
Mechanism Name

EQ
FL
D
LS
SW
T
V (l or t)
WF
CY

Earthquake
Flood
Drought
Landslide (deep or shallow)
Severe Weather
Tsunami and Seiche
Volcanic (lahar or tephra-specific)
Wildfire
Cyber

CD
C
CG
TG
FD
SD
U
O
PE

CU

Civil Unrest

PC

DF

Dam Failure

PPW

Completed and Deferred
Continued
City Government
Town Government
Fire District
School District
Utility
Other
Public Education
General Pierce County
Government
Pierce County Planning
and Public Works
Government

HT
EP
TE
HC
MH

Hazardous Material &
Transportation Incidents
Epidemic and Pandemic
Terrorism & Extremism
Human-Caused Hazards
Multi-hazards, including some
Human-caused. Where only
natural hazards are addressed, it
is noted.

PAGE 5-48
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 6: Infrastructure

Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Infrastructure Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A) and §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B). This plan must include the following:
(2) A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce
losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable
the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from
identified hazards. The risk assessment must include:
(ii) A description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph
(c)(2)(i) of this section. This description must include an overall summary of each hazard and
its impact on the community. All plans approved after October 1, 2008 must also address NFIP
insured structures that have been repetitively damaged by floods. The plan must describe
vulnerability in terms of the following:
(A) The types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical
facilities located in the identified hazard areas;
(B) An estimate of the potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified in
paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to
prepare the estimate.

PAGE 6-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 6: Infrastructure
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE 6-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table of Contents
Infrastructure Requirements................................................................................................................ 1
Infrastructure Overview ....................................................................................................................... 4
Infrastructure Summary and Vulnerability ....................................................................................... 4
Comprehensive Infrastructure Table ................................................................................................... 6
Endnotes............................................................................................................................................. 14

PAGE 6-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Infrastructure Overview
The Infrastructure Section for City of University Place is displayed in following tables and figures:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Table 6-1 Infrastructure Summary;
Table 6-2 Infrastructure Category Summary;
Figure 6-1 Infrastructure Dependency Matrix;
Table 6-3 Comprehensive Infrastructure Table;
Table 6-4 Comprehensive Infrastructure Table Key – Hazard Ratings; and
Table 6-5 Comprehensive Infrastructure Table Key -- External Dependency Category.

The tables and figures show the overview of infrastructure owned by the City of University Place. The
infrastructure is categorized according to the infrastructure sectors as designated by the Department
of Homeland Security. For further detail on the Department of Homeland Security Infrastructure
Sectors, see the Pierce County RHMP Base Plan, Section 6: Infrastructure.

Infrastructure Summary and Vulnerability
Table 6-1 Infrastructure Summary1

Infrastructure Summary
Total Infrastructure (#)
Total Value ($)

4
$32,175,200

Table 6-2 Infrastructure Category Summary2

Infrastructure Category Summary
Emergency Services
Telecommunications
Transportation
Water
Energy
Government
Commercial

0
0
0
0
0
4
0

PAGE 6-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Figure 6-1 Infrastructure Dependency Matrix

West Pierce Fire & Rescue

South Sound 911

Tacoma Public Utilities
Emergency Services

Energy

Telecommunications

City of
University
Place
Transportation

Water

WSDOT

Tacoma Public Utilities

Pierce Transit

PAGE 6-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Comprehensive Infrastructure Table
Table 6-3 Comprehensive Infrastructure Table

Telecomm.

Transportation

Water

1

1

1

1

1

$1,506,400

35,000

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

$30,238,200

35,000

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

$146,400

25

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

Wildfire

1

Volcano/Lahar

Sewer

Tsunami/Seiche

Severe Weather

Power

No

Emergency

1

1

Landslide

1930

6

1

Flood

2007

50

Earthquake

1

$284,200

Drought

1999

Yes,
Commercial
Kitchen
Yes,
Expansion
No

People Served

1

Upgrades5

1940

Dependency

Value

Public Works
Shop
Civic Building
Adrianna
Hess
Wetland
Park (house)

Floors

Senior
Center

Built4

Infrastructure3

Natural Hazard

PAGE 6-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 6-4 Comprehensive Infrastructure Table Key – Hazard Ratings

Hazard
Category

Drought

Rating

Selection Factor or Description

0

The infrastructure would not suffer any damage or operational disruption
from a drought.

1

The infrastructure could suffer some damage or minor operational
disruption from a drought.

2

The infrastructure has suffered damages or significant operational
disruption from past droughts.

3

The infrastructure has suffered damages or significant operational
disruption from past droughts which has had serious community
economic or health consequences.

0

The infrastructure is not located in an area considered to have any
significant risk of earthquake

1

The infrastructure is in an area considered at risk to earthquakes but has
no prior history of earthquake damage.

2

The infrastructure is in an area considered at risk to earthquakes, is
located on soft soils, and has no history of damage OR in an area
considered as at risk to earthquakes and has experienced some limited
earthquake damage.

3

The infrastructure is in an area considered at risk to earthquakes, is
located on soft soils and experienced significant earthquake damage.

0

The infrastructure is not located in a known flood plain or flood prone
area.

1

The infrastructure is in a flood plain or flood prone area but has no prior
history of flood damage.

2

The infrastructure is in a flood plain or flood prone area and has
experienced some flood damage in the past.

3

The infrastructure is in a flood plain or flood prone area and has
experienced significant flood damage, or the property is an NFIP
repetitive loss property.

Earthquake

Flood

PAGE 6-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Hazard
Category

Rating

Selection Factor or Description

0

The infrastructure is not located in a known area considered vulnerable
to landslides.

1

The infrastructure is in area vulnerable to landslides but has no prior
history of landslides.

2

The infrastructure is in area vulnerable to landslides area and
infrastructure has experienced some landslide damage.

3

The infrastructure is in an area vulnerable to landslides and infrastructure
has experienced significant landslide damage.

0

The infrastructure would not suffer any damage or operational disruption
from severe weather.

1

The infrastructure could suffer some damage or minor operational
disruption from severe weather.

2

The infrastructure has suffered damages or significant operational
disruption from past severe weather.

3

The infrastructure has suffered damages or significant operational
disruption from past severe weather which has had serious community
economic or health consequences.

0

The infrastructure is not located in or near a known area considered to be
a tsunami or seiche inundation area.

1

The infrastructure is located at the edge of a designated tsunami or
seiche risk zone.

2

The infrastructure is located just inside a designated tsunami or seiche
risk zone but has no prior damage.

3

The infrastructure is located well inside a designated tsunami or seiche
risk zone, and/or has experienced prior tsunami or seiche damage.

0

The infrastructure is not located in or near a known area with significant
risk from volcanic hazards.

1

The infrastructure is in or near an area that could receive some ashfall,
but has no structural features, equipment or operations considered
vulnerable to ash.

2

The infrastructure is in or near an area where heavy ashfall or a debris
flow could occur.

3

The infrastructure is in an area known to have experienced heavy ashfall,
debris flow or blast effects from past volcanic activity.

Landslide

Severe
Weather

Tsunami &
Seiche

Volcano &
Lahar

PAGE 6-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Hazard
Category

Rating

Selection Factor or Description

0

The infrastructure meets the current fire code, has adequate separation
from other structures and good access, and is not close to heavily
vegetated areas.

1

The infrastructure meets the current fire code, is not close to heavily
vegetated areas, but access and/or separation from nearby structures
increase fire risk.

2

The infrastructure does not meet current fire code, is in or adjacent to
large, vegetated areas, and has inadequate access and/or separation
from other structures.

3

The infrastructure does not meet the current fire code, is in or adjacent
to vegetated areas, with access limitations or structure separation making
fire suppression difficult.

Wildfire

PAGE 6-9
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table 6-5 Comprehensive Infrastructure Table Key -- External Dependency Category

External
Dependency
Category

Rating

Selection Factor or Description

0

The infrastructure can maintain essential functions without emergency
services.

0

The infrastructure has ability to independently provide emergency
services to all essential functions of infrastructure.

1

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
emergency services with no direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences.

2

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
emergency services with some direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences OR stop
operations with no direct economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences.

3

The infrastructure would have to stop its operations without emergency
services and significant economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences will occur.

0

The infrastructure can maintain essential functions without electricity or
gas supply.

0

Infrastructure has ability to independently provide power to all essential
functions of infrastructure.

1

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
gas or electrical supply, with no direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences.

2

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
gas or electrical supply, with some direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences OR stop
operations with no direct economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences.

3

The infrastructure would have to stop its operations without gas or
electrical supply and significant economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences will occur.

Emergency
Services

Power

PAGE 6-10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

External
Dependency
Category

Rating

Selection Factor or Description

0

The infrastructure is not located in a known flood plain or flood prone
area.

0

The infrastructure has ability to independently provide wastewater or
septic service to support essential functions.

1

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
wastewater service, with no direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences.

2

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
wastewater service, with some direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences OR stop
operations with no direct economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences.

3

The infrastructure would have to stop its operations without wastewater
service and significant economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences will occur.

0

The infrastructure can maintain essential functions without
telecommunications.

0

The infrastructure has ability to independently provide phone service or
alternate/redundant communications systems to support essential
functions.

1

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
telecommunication service, with no direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences.

2

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
telecommunication service, with some direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences OR stop
operations with no direct economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences.

3

The infrastructure would have to stop its operations without
telecommunication service and significant
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences will occur.

Sewer Out

Telecomm
Failure

PAGE 6-11
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

External
Dependency
Category

Rating

Selection Factor or Description

0

The infrastructure can maintain essential functions without
transportation routes.

0

Infrastructure has ability to independently provide alternate
transportation, in the absence of transportation routes, to ensure all
essential functions.

1

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
transportation routes with no direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences.

2

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
transportation routes with some direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences OR stop
operations with no direct economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences.

3

The infrastructure would have to stop its operations without
transportation routes and significant
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences will occur.

0

The infrastructure can maintain essential functions without its water
supply.

0

The infrastructure has ability to independently provide water to support
essential functions.

1

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
water supply, with no direct economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences.

2

The infrastructure would have to curtail operations somewhat without
water supply, with some direct economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences OR stop operations with no direct
economic/environmental/safety/health consequences.

3

The infrastructure would have to stop its operations without its water
supply and significant economic/environmental/safety/health
consequences will occur.

Transportation

Water Supply

PAGE 6-12
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE 6-13
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Endnotes
1

This is a total of infrastructure and the approximate value provided by the jurisdiction. If no value, then value was
not provided or not available.
2

These are the Homeland Security Infrastructure Categories which were used in completing the Infrastructure
Tables in the plan.
3

4

The following table explains the codes used in this column:
Code

Explanation

C

Infrastructure critical in first 72 hours after disaster

AP

Infrastructure has auxiliary or backup power

(#)

Homeland Security Infrastructure Category Number

S

Infrastructure is a designated community shelter

The “Built” column refers to the year in which the original infrastructure was constructed.

5

This column addresses major remodels, upgrades or additions to the infrastructure in dollar amount and/or year
of changes.

PAGE 6-14
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 6: Infrastructure
Disclaimer

Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Infrastructure Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
No CFR Requirements in this Section

PAGE DISCLAIMER-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 6: Infrastructure Disclaimer
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE DISCLAIMER-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Disclaimer
This Jurisdictional Annex’s Section 6: Infrastructure is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to
RCW 42.56.420. Request for public disclosure of this document or parts thereof should be
referred immediately to the Pierce County Executive.
Distribution or changes to this document without the express written consent of Pierce
County’s County Executive is prohibited.

PAGE DISCLAIMER-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE DISCLAIMER-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 7: Plan Maintenance
Procedures
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Plan Maintenance Procedures
Requirement
Code of Federal Regulations 44
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(i), §201.6(c)(4)(ii), and §201.6(c)(4) (iii). This plan must
include the following:
(4) A plan maintenance process that includes:
(i) A section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and
updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle.
(ii) A process by which local governments incorporate the requirements of the
mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital
improvement plans, when appropriate.
(iii) Discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan
maintenance process.

PAGE 7-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Section 7: Plan Maintenance
Procedures
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE 7-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Table of Contents
Plan Maintenance Procedures Requirement .................................................................................. 1
Plan Maintenance Procedures Overview ....................................................................................... 4
Plan Adoption.................................................................................................................................. 6
Maintenance Strategy..................................................................................................................... 7
Continued Public Involvement ...................................................................................................... 12
Endnotes ....................................................................................................................................... 14

PAGE 7-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Plan Maintenance Procedures
Overview
The Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan (RHMP) planning process began in
September of 2024 and continues to build on the foundation of breaking the disaster cycle by
planning for a disaster-resilient City of University Place and Pierce County. This plan update
includes two planning processes that set the foundation for the plan maintenance cycle:
Planning Process #1 and Planning Process #2. The plan maintenance cycle includes public
engagement as well as plan writing, review, approval, and local adoption (see Figure 7-1). The
Pierce County RHMP – including its Base Plan and Jurisdictional Annexes – is updated every five
years.
Figure 7-1 The Plan Maintenance Cycle of Public Engagement, Plan Writing, Plan Approval, Local Adoption, and
Continued Engagement
The Planning Process
for Plan Update Begins

Public Engagement
Continues for Hazard
Mitigation Planning

Local Jurisdictions
Engage their
Communities

Jurisdictional Annexes
are Approved and
Locally Adopted

Jurisdictional Annexes
are Submitted for
Federal Review

Local Jurisdictions
Update their
Jurisdictional Annexes

Jurisdictional Annexes
are Submitted for State
Review

PAGE 7-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

This Jurisdictional Annex Section 7: Plan Maintenance details the formal process that will
guarantee the City of University Place’s Jurisdictional Annex continues to remain an active and
relevant document. The Plan Maintenance Section includes a description of the documentation
citing the Jurisdictional Annex’s formal adoption by the University Place City Council. The
section also describes the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and updating within
the next five-year cycle; the process for incorporating the mitigation strategy into existing
mechanisms and the process for integrating public participation throughout the plan
maintenance. The section serves as a guide for implementation of the hazard mitigation
strategy in this Jurisdictional Annex’s Section 5: Mitigation Strategy.

PAGE 7-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Plan Adoption
The initial review of the City of University Place’s Jurisdictional Annex – in addition to the
greater Pierce County RHMP – is a “Pre-Adoption Review” allowed by Washington State
Emergency Management Division (EMD) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) Region X. Washington State EMD and FEMA will concurrently review the Pierce County
RHMP and either approve it subject to adoption or require some changes along with adoption
prior to final approval. Once this is complete, each jurisdiction will then formally adopt the
newly updated Jurisdictional Annex and resubmit it for final approval.
Upon the City of University Place’s Jurisdictional Annex being submitted to Washington State
EMD by the Pierce County Department of Emergency Management (PCDEM), Washington State
EMD has 30 days to review and approve the Jurisdictional Annex. FEMA’s review of the City of
University Place’s Jurisdictional Annex will occur concurrently with Washington State EMD’s
review. FEMA’s review, which is allowed 45 days by law, will address the federal criteria
outlined in FEMA Interim Final Rule 44 CFR Part §201.6. With the completion and review of this
plan as documented in this Jurisdictional Annex’s Appendix A there may be revisions requested
by Washington State EMD and/or FEMA. Revisions could include changes to background
information, editorial comments, and the alteration of technical content. PCDEM will call a
meeting with the City of University Place’s Jurisdictional Annex planning partners to address
any revisions needed and resubmit the Jurisdictional Annex with appropriate changes.
The City of University Place’s City Council is responsible for the adoption of the Jurisdictional
Annex after the Pre-Adoption Review by Washington State EMD and the FEMA Region X. Once
the City of University Place adopts the Jurisdictional Annex, the City of University Place will be
responsible for submitting it, with a copy of the signed resolution, to PCDEM. PCDEM will
record this signed copy in Appendix A of the City of University Place’s Jurisdictional Annex and
forward this copy to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer at Washington State EMD. Washington
State EMD will then forward this signed copy to FEMA Region X for final approval. Upon
approval by FEMA, the City of University Place will gain eligibility for relevant grant and disaster
funding opportunities.
Appendix A of this Jurisdictional Annex will list the final approval dates and include a copy of the
signed resolution from the jurisdiction as well as a copy of the FEMA letter approving of the
Jurisdictional Annex. For the duration of this five-year plan, Appendix C of this Jurisdictional
Annex will be used to track changes and/or updates. The Pierce County RHMP will have to be
re-adopted and re-approved with the five-year update cycle coinciding with FEMA’s approval.

PAGE 7-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Maintenance Strategy
The City of University Place maintenance strategy for implementation, monitoring, and
evaluation provides a structure that encourages collaboration, information transference, and
innovation for the Pierce County RHMP. Through a multi-tiered implementation method, City of
University Place will provide its communities a highly localized approach to reducing risk while
serving their needs through coordinated policies and programs. This method emphasizes highly
participatory planning process and highlights adaptability to changing risks and vulnerabilities.
Finally, the maintenance strategy section will provide a tangible link between the jurisdictional
partner’s community and the various levels of government service – from the local level up to
the federal level. Through this strategy, City of University Place will continue Pierce County’s
mission to break the disaster cycle and bolster more disaster-resilient communities.

Implementation
In order to ensure efficient and effective implementation, the City of University Place will make
use of its capabilities, infrastructure, and dedicated population. The City of University Place will
implement its mitigation strategy over the next five years primarily through its annual budget
process and varying grant application processes. All programs and entities identified in Section
3: Capability Identification will serve as the implementing mechanisms within those processes.
The City of University Place administration will work in conjunction with those
departments/agencies/entities identified in both Section 3: Capability Identification and under
each mitigation strategy to initiate the mitigation strategy. For example, any infrastructurerelated strategies will be implemented through the Critical Facilities and Capital Improvement
Plans and the various departments involved through the normal budget schedule. Any
regulatory and land use strategies will continue to be implemented through collaboration with
the planning department and its updates of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Other strategies will
be implemented through collaboration with the identified jurisdictions/departments listed
under each strategy’s evaluation and through the mechanisms and funding sources identified in
Section 3: Capability Identification.
These efforts fall under a broader implementation strategy that represents a county-wide
effort. This strategy must be adaptable to change while being consistent in its delivery.
The mitigation implementation strategy is a three-tiered method that emphasizes localized
needs and vulnerabilities while addressing the City of University Place as well as multijurisdictional policies and programs. The first tier is implementation through individual level—
existing Public Education Programs already existing in the City of University Place (for example,
at the individual level through the Safe Streets Program and at the neighborhood level through
PAGE 7-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

PC NET and CERT). The second is the City-Wide mechanism for implementation, in this case the
City Administration. The third tier is a more external and multi-jurisdictional mechanism, the
Hazard Mitigation Forum (HMF).
This method ensures that implementation speaks to unique vulnerabilities at the most local
level, allows for coordination among and between levels, and promotes collaboration and
innovation. Further, it provides a structured system of monitoring implementation. Finally, it is
a method that can adapt to the changing vulnerabilities of the City, the region, and the times.
These three levels and their means of implementation and collaboration are described below.

Public Education Programs
At the individual level, Public Education Programs provide the City of University Place with a
localized mechanism for implementation. This approach to mitigation can adapt to the varying
vulnerabilities and needs within a growing City and region. Public Education Programs are also a
means for involving the public in mitigation policy development. Departments conducting
mitigation-related programs will provide the existing targeted neighborhoods and special-needs
populations a catalogue of mitigation strategies from which individuals can choose those that
would be most effective in their communities. For example, the City of University Place
currently has worked with PCDEM to form University Place PC NETs to better prepare for, and
respond to, disasters. PC NETs provide a coordinated group of communities through which
individuals can implement home and neighborhood level mitigation strategies. The City of
University Place also has several trained Community Emergency Response Team Volunteers
through West Pierce Fire & Rescue’s CERT program.

Jurisdiction-Wide: City of University Place
The City administration will be the body responsible for determining the direction of the
Jurisdictional Annex’s implementation. The administration is responsible to the City Manager
for the day-to-day operations of the City of University Place and its departments, the annual
budget, and personnel. The administration is responsible for the City of University Place’s
selection, evaluation, and training of all city staff. It oversees, coordinates, and manages the
activities of all city departments and offices in carrying out the requirements of ordinances,
laws, rules and regulations.
Initially, the administration will be responsible for the overall review of the Jurisdictional Annex
and will designate mitigation strategies to those departments responsible for their
implementation. This will be done with assistance from the Public Safety Administrator,
Development Services Director, and Engineering and Capital Improvements Director, and the
Emergency Management Coordinator through the West Pierce Emergency Management
PAGE 7-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Coalition. The administration will address the Jurisdictional Annex on a biennial basis.
Recommendations will be made to coincide with the normal budgeting processes and provide
an ample time period for review and adoption of any necessary changes to the implementation
schedule.
Eventually, the administration may choose to cede this responsibility to an Emergency
Management Committee. This committee would be composed of representatives from the
departments identified in Section 3: Capability Identification as having a role in hazard
mitigation. The Committee would ultimately provide a mechanism for coordination among
those departments engaged in mitigation to ensure that a comprehensive and efficient
approach be undertaken in the City of University Place’s efforts at all-hazards mitigation.

Hazard Mitigation Forum
The Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Forum (HMF) represents a broader and multi-jurisdictional
approach to mitigation implementation. The Pierce County HMF will be comprised of all
representatives from unincorporated Pierce County and all jurisdictions, partially or wholly,
within its borders, that have undertaken mitigation planning efforts. The Pierce County HMF
will serve as coordinating body for projects of a multi-jurisdictional nature and will provide a
mechanism to share successes and increase the cooperation necessary to break the disaster
cycle and achieve a disaster resistant Pierce County. Members of the Pierce County HMF will
include the following jurisdictional planning partners who have completed, or who have begun
the process of completing, CFR §201.6 compliant plans as detailed in the Pierce County RHMP
Base Plan, Section 1: Plan Process.
Coordinated by PCDEM, the Pierce County HMF will meet annually. The City of University Place
will be an active participant in the Pierce County HMF and will be represented by the
designated planning partner or their representative. Only through this level of cooperation can
these jurisdictions meet all their mitigation goals.

Regional Mitigation Planning
Pierce County was configured into five Regional Planning Groups based on a commonality in
geographical hazards for the 2025-2030 mitigation plan update to foster relationship building
and resiliency planning amongst jurisdictions. Although much of the meeting and planning time
focused on plan updates and fostered relationship building the resiliency planning component
will continue within multi-jurisdictional groups working together to further reduce risk. This
provides another opportunity for continued collaboration planning amongst jurisdictions
working and partnering together. The meeting frequency will be driven by the mitigation
implementation strategy and combines the three-tiered approach. City of University Place will
PAGE 7-9
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

continue to engage within the “Southwest Group” geographical planning area and will provide
the specific department representative to engage in and implement mitigation activities within
this geographical group.

Plan Evaluation and Update
It should be noted this planning process began in September of 2024 following the then current
CFR §201.6 Hazard Mitigation Planning Requirements. Based on new requirements in the
Stafford Act, City of University Place will evaluate and update the Jurisdictional Annex to
incorporate these new requirements as necessary. Furthermore, if there are additional Stafford
Act changes affecting CFR §201.6 in the coming years, the planning process will incorporate
those as well.
The City of University Place Jurisdictional Annex will guide City of University Place’s mitigation
efforts for the foreseeable future. The City of University Place representatives on the Pierce
County RHMP Planning Team have developed a method to ensure that regular review and
update of the Jurisdictional Annex occur within a five- year cycle. PCDEM will coordinate any
reviews through the annual meeting noted above.
PCDEM will collaborate with City of University Place and the PC HMF to monitor and evaluate
the mitigation strategy implementation. PCDEM will track this implementation through Pierce
County’s GIS database. Findings will be presented and discussed at the annual meeting.
City of University Place will provide a report of the Jurisdictional Annex’s implementation to the
City Council at the Pierce County RHMP annual meeting. This report will drive the meeting
agendas and will include the following:
•
•
•
•
•

Updates on implementation throughout City of University Place;
Updates on the PC HMF and mitigation activities undertaken by neighboring
jurisdictions;
Changes or anticipated changes in hazard risk and vulnerability at the city, county,
regional, State, FEMA, and Homeland Security levels;
Problems encountered or success stories; and
Any technical or scientific advances that may alter, make easier, or create strategies.

City of University Place and local experts will decide on updates to the Jurisdictional Annex’s
strategy based on the above information and a discussion of:
•
•
•

The various resources available through budgetary means as well as any relevant grants;
The current and expected political environment and public opinion; and
Meeting the mitigation goals with regards to changing conditions.

PAGE 7-10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

PCDEM will work with City of University Place and the Emergency Management Coordinator
through West Pierce Emergency Management Coalition to review Section 4: Risk Assessment to
determine if the current assessment should be updated or modified based on new information.
This will be done during the regularly scheduled reviews of the Pierce County RHMP Risk
Assessment and Methodology.
Additional reviews of this Jurisdictional Annex will be required following disaster events.
Following a significant incident impacting City of University Place, City of University Place’s
designated representative will provide an assessment that captures any “success stories”
and/or “lessons learned.” The assessment will detail direct and indirect damages to City of
University Place and its infrastructure, response, and recovery costs, as part of the standard
recovery procedures. This process will help determine any new mitigation initiatives that should
be incorporated into the Jurisdictional Annex to avoid or reduce similar losses due to future
hazard events. In this manner, recovery efforts and data will be used to analyze mitigation
activities and spawn the development of new strategies that better address any changed
vulnerabilities or capabilities. Any updates to the Jurisdictional Annex or Pierce County RHMP
will be addressed at the annual meeting.
As per 44 CFR §201.6, the City of University Place must re-submit the Jurisdictional Annex to
Washington State and FEMA with any updates every five years. This process will be coordinated
by PCDEM through the Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Forum. In 2030, and every five years
following at the Hazard Mitigation Forum, the City of University Place will submit the updated
Jurisdictional Annex to PCDEM. PCDEM will collect updates from any Pierce County RHMP
jurisdictional partners and submit them to Washington State EMD and FEMA within the
appropriate timeframes.

PAGE 7-11
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Continued Public Involvement
City of University Place is dedicated to continued public involvement and education in review
and updates of this Jurisdictional Annex. City of University Place will retain copies of the
Jurisdictional Annex and will make it available to the public.
The three-tiered implementation method provides an opportunity for continuous public
involvement. Public Education campaigns are a means of informing the public on updates and
implementation activities. Further, prior to submitting the plan to WA EMD and FEMA for the
five-year review, the City of University Place will hold a public information and comment
meeting. This meeting will provide individuals a forum during which they can express their
concerns, opinions, or ideas about City of University Place’s Jurisdictional Annex. Continuous
public involvement is paramount to the success of the City of University Place’s Jurisdictional
Annex, and ongoing outreach will be conducted in regard to City of University Place’s
Jurisdictional Annex to ensure the community is aware of the updates being done. The City of
University Place will work with the West Pierce Emergency Management Coalition to conduct
outreach. For the 2025 Jurisdictional Annex update, an article was posted on the West Pierce
Emergency Management Coalition’s website1 that linked to a household survey for community
members to take. The data was utilized in the City of University Place’s update. Several public
outreach presentations were also conducted within the City of University Place.
The City of University Place will conduct a review on a yearly basis to ensure all elements of the
Jurisdictional Annex are updated and accurate. Each of the jurisdictional annexes in the Pierce
County RHMP have been tasked with having to provide documentation on public involvement
including a brief description for each public hearing held, a summary on attendance, any
feedback received from the public and an overall description of what was accomplished. Even
further, City of University Place will provide proof of their attempts for public involvement such
as screenshots of websites including date ranges, flyers and other relevant material
documenting the public involvement process. Refer to Appendix D for a comprehensive list and
supporting materials. Lastly, the City of University Place will look for new innovative ways for
public involvement.

PAGE 7-12
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE 7-13
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Endnotes
1 West Pierce Emergency Management. (2025). West Pierce Emergency Management Survey. www.cityofup.com

PAGE 7-14
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025 – 2030 UPDATE

Appendix A, B, C, and D

Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 - 2030 Update

Appendices Requirements
Code of Federal Regulations 44
Plan Content – Requirement §201.6(c)(1). This plan must include the following:
(c) Plan content. The plan must include the following:
(1) Documentation of the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it
was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved.
(5) Documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of
the jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan (e.g., City Council, County
Commissioner, Tribal Council). For multi-jurisdictional plans, each jurisdiction requesting
approval of the plan must document that it has been formally adopted.

PAGE A-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Appendix A: Plan Adoption
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE A-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Plan Adoption
The Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan (RHMP) was adopted by the City of
University Place’s City Council on MONTH XX, 2026 by resolution number ####. Page A-4 shows
a copy of that resolution. Page A-6 and A-7 show a copy of FEMA’s formal approval letter.

Plan Review and Approval
Table A-1 Jurisdictional Annex Review Process

City of University Place Jurisdictional Annex Approval
Agency

Washington State Military
Dept., Emergency Management
Division
FEMA Region X
Acting Risk Analysis Branch
Chief
Mitigation Division
FEMA Region X
Acting Risk Analysis Branch
Chief
Mitigation Division

Representative

Date

Tim Cook

Approved
July 23, 2026

Andrew W. Jones

Plan Approved Pending
Adoption
July 23, 2026

TBD

Approved
MONTH XX, 2026

PAGE A-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Plan Adoption Resolution
TBD

PAGE A-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

FEMA Formal APA Letter

PAGE A-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Figure A-1 FEMA Formal APA Letter, Part I of II

PAGE A-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Figure A-2 FEMA Formal APA Letter, Part II of II

PAGE A-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE A-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Appendix B: Mitigation Planning
Partners
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE B-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Mitigation Planning Partners
Table B-1 Mitigation Planning Partners List

City of University Place Planning Partners List
Name

Title

Jurisdiction or Department

Lisa Petorak
Jack Ecklund

Manager
Director
Public Safety
Director
Deputy Director
Emergency
Management
Coordinator

Human Resources
Engineering and Capital Projects

Jennifer Hales
Debra Kelly Sage
Serena Rotondo

City of University Place
Public Works Operations
West Pierce Fire and Rescue
West Pierce Emergency Management Coalition

PAGE B-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Appendix C: Plan Revisions
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE C-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Plan Revisions
Table C-1 Plan Revisions Table

Record of Changes
Change Number

Description of Change
(with page numbers)

Date

Authorized by

PAGE C-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Appendix D: Documentation Records
Pierce County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2025 – 2030 Update

City of University Place
Cities and Towns Group

PAGE D-1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Public Meeting Documentation
Figure D-1 Rachel Adler, Preparedness Coordinator Sharing Hazard Mitigation Information at Fall Safey Day.

PAGE D-2
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Figure D- 2 West Pierce Emergency Management Coalition’s Website Article

PAGE D-3
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Elected Officials Meeting
Figure D- 3 Public Safety Advisory Commission Meeting Agenda

PAGE D-4
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Figure D- 4 Parks Advisory Commission Meeting Agenda

PAGE D-5
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

PAGE D-6
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

Figure D- 5, Economic Development Advisory Commission Meeting Agenda

PAGE D-7
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

This page is intentionally left blank

PAGE D-8
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX
PIERCE COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN | 2025-2030 UPDATE

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES
Health Lens Analysis Tool
What is Health in All Policies?

Health in All Policies (HiAP) shape the health and well-being of the communities they serve. When decision makers
adopt this approach and use tools such as this Health Lens Analysis Tool, they are better able to identify how
policy decisions influence the root causes of poor health outcomes. For further explanation, please reference
Appendix 1.

What can the Health Lens Analysis Tool help you do?
1. Assess the potential health impacts of a proposed policy or decision.
a. Use the tool to consider how a proposal may affect the health and well-being of
different groups in the community. This includes looking beyond immediate outcomes to
identify who may benefit, who may be burdened, etc.
2. Identify opportunities within the proposal to improve its impacts on the social, economic and
environmental causes of health.
a. Use the tool to strengthen the proposal by considering changes that could better
support fair access to healthy environments and community well-being.

Name of Proposed Policy or Decision
2025-2030 Hazard Mitigation Plan

Health Lens Analysis Questions

1. What is this proposal trying to achieve or address?

The Hazard Mitigation Plan establishes a coordinated, long-term strategy to reduce risks to people, property, and the
environment from natural hazards, while strengthening community resilience, preparedness, and continuity of operations.

2. Which groups of people will be most impacted by this proposal?
The Hazard Mitigation Plan affects the entire community, including residents, businesses, public agencies, and the natural
environment. It places particular focus on people living in high-risk areas and populations that may be more vulnerable
due to factors like age, income, or health.

3. Which groups of people who may be impacted have you consulted with when developing the proposal?
The City consulted with the community through a public survey and was made accessible in multiple languages including
Filipino, Korean, Russian, Spanish, and Vietnamese to ensure more inclusive participation. The City also worked with
Pierce County and the State for its review of mitigation measures.

City of University Place, Health in All Policies - 2026

Page 1 of 3

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES
Health Lens Analysis Tool
4. How would this proposal improve or impair the social conditions of the community, and which populations?
The Hazard Mitigation Plan is expected to improve social conditions by increasing safety, preparedness, and resilience across the community, especially
for those in high-risk areas and vulnerable populations. It helps maintain essential services and supports community stability during and after hazard
events. However, the plan may create short-term challenges such as construction disruptions, increased costs, or changes to the built environment that
affect daily routines. These impacts may disproportionately affect populations with fewer resources to adapt, including low-income households and
individuals with mobility or health challenges.

5. How would this proposal improve or impair the economic conditions of the community, and which populations?
The Hazard Mitigation Plan is expected to improve economic conditions by reducing long-term damage to property, infrastructure, and businesses,
helping maintain economic stability and supporting sustainable growth. However, it may create short-term challenges such as increased costs,
construction impacts, or temporary disruptions to local businesses and transportation. These impacts may disproportionately affect small businesses
and lower-income households that have fewer financial resources to absorb short-term losses.

6. How would this proposal improve or impair the environmental conditions of the community, and which populations?
The Hazard Mitigation Plan improves environmental conditions by protecting natural resources and reducing damage from hazards, supporting more
resilient ecosystems. These benefits support the broader community, especially residents who rely on healthy natural areas for quality of life. However,
some mitigation actions may create short-term impacts such as construction disturbance, vegetation removal, or noise. These temporary effects may
be more noticeable for nearby residents and communities located around project areas.

7. What actions will be taken to make this proposal supportive of health in University Place?
No change (please explain): The proposal does not require amendments because it already follows a comprehensive, well-established

planning framework that aligns with FEMA guidance and regional best practices. It incorporates risk
assessment, mitigation strategies, and ongoing plan maintenance. The plan ensures it remains effective
and adaptable over time. The inclusion of public outreach and community input also demonstrates a
commitment to inclusive planning. Overall, the proposal is effective at balancing risk reduction, community
resilience, and long-term sustainability.

Amend the following in the proposal
(please explain): No amendments needed at this time.

City of University Place, Health in All Policies - 2026

Page 2 of 3

HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES
Health Lens Analysis Tool

Health Lens Analysis Tool Guide

This guide provides a brief explanation for each of the questions in the Health Lens Analysis Tool.
1. What is this policy or decision trying to achieve or address?

Articulating the purpose of any policy or decision is the first step in identifying what aspects of it are most
important to achieving that vision, and how health costs and benefits relate to that purpose.

2. Which groups of people will be most impacted by this policy or decision?

Consider the following populations: people living in poverty, the unemployed, minority populations,
young children and seniors, non-English speakers, people with disabilities, LGBTQIA+, gender(s), military/
veterans, others(?).

3. Who have you consulted in helping to shape the proposal?

People’s health improves when they have some control over their circumstances and can help shape
decisions and policies that impact them. Those most impacted should be meaningfully involved.

4. How would this proposal or decision improve or impair the social conditions of the community? Social

conditions such as education level, race, disability status, housing stability and connection to the
community are root causes of health. Policies and decisions that support health provide opportunities for
quality education, social inclusiveness, and community support for people of all backgrounds.

5. How would this proposal or decision improve or impair the economic conditions of the community?

Income, employment, and affordability are also root causes of health. Health promoting decisions and
policies support growth of local businesses and living wage jobs near transit and homes.

6. How would this proposal or decision improve or impair the environment?

Health of the natural and built environment supports overall health. Health promoting decisions and
policies help balance protecting natural resources with creating safe and resilient neighborhoods, making
it convenient for people to be physically active, eat healthy food and interact with neighbors.

7. What actions would need to be taken to ensure this policy or decision supports health?

How could the decision minimize potential negative consequences and support positive health? Who else
in the community is working on the same issues? Consider an inter-local agreement or joint resolution
to achieve mutual goals.

City of University Place, Health in All Policies - 2026

Page 3 of 3

Memo
DATE:

October 19, 2026

TO:

City Council

FROM:

Bernadette Moreland, Human Resources Manager
Lisa Petorak, Director of Administrative Services

SUBJECT:

2027-2030 IUOE Local #612 Union Contract

Summary
The International Union of Operating Engineers Local #612 (Union) represents the City’s
Public Works Maintenance Workers and has done so since 2000. The Union currently covers
twelve (12) Public Works employees. The Union entered formal negotiations beginning in June
of 2026 to discuss changes to the current contract that began in 2023 and will end December
31, 2026. The City and the Union have agreed to a four-year proposal that would go into
effect on January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2030, upon the adoption of a resolution by
Council and the signing of the contract.
Highlights and Changes
Wages
Effective January 1, 2027, Union members shall be eligible for a 4.5% cost of living
adjustment. On January 1, 2028, Union members shall be eligible for a 3.5% cost of living
adjustment. Beginning on January 1, 2029, and January 1, 2030, Union members shall be
eligible for a fixed 3% cost of living adjustment in each of those respective years. Staff believe
they reasonably reflect anticipated inflation. Since 2000, the June-to-June CPI-U for SeattleTacoma-Bellevue (previously Bremerton) has averaged 3.0%, while the 50-year annual
average is 4%.
Negotiations were still ongoing when the proposed 2027–2028 biennial budget was presented
on October 5. Because Human Resources kept Finance informed throughout the process, the
anticipated costs were included in the forecast and will be reflected in the final budget
presentation in November.
Standby Duty
The rate of pay for standby will increase accordingly: $3.55 per hour of standby duty
beginning January 1, 2027. On January 1, 2028, the allowance will be $3.70 an hour. On
January 1, 2029, the allowance will be $3.95 an hour. Starting January 1, 2030, the allowance
will be $4.15.
Before a second or additional employee responds to assist with a standby event, the employee
must contact a supervisor and receive prior approval to go to the scene.

University Place City Hall
3609 Market Place West, Suite 200
University Place, WA 98466-4488

Tel 253.566.5656
Fax 253.566.5658

www.CityofUP.com

Memo
City Logo Clothing
Beginning January 1, 2027, employees will receive City logo clothing to promote safety,
security, and professionalism. Each employee will receive one (1) hat, two (2) sweatshirts,
eight (8) T-shirts, one (1) jacket, and one (1) set of rain gear. Employees must wear, at
minimum, a City logo T-shirt and ensure their outermost, public-facing garment displays the
City logo. No other type of logo or graphics/pictures/images are allowed.
Boot Allowance
The previous contract provided a yearly allowance of $500 to purchase work boots. Under the
new agreement, the boot allowance is increased to $550 per year. These allowances are
prorated for employees who start work after the first of the year and pass their initial
probation period.
Commercial Driving License
For new employees hired after the ratification of this contract, the City will pay for one training
course and one test to help an employee obtain a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL). An
employee who earns a City-funded CDL must remain employed by the City for at least two
(2) years. If the employee leaves before completing this commitment, the employee must
reimburse the City for cost of the training and test.
Dental and Vision
The Union has decided to opt for the same dental and vision plan currently in place for nonrepresented staff. This change would be effective January 1, 2027.
Conclusion
The maintenance of a four-year contract spans two biennial budgets and will provide for
stability in financial forecasting over a longer period of time. In 2027, the added cost is
approximately $20,000, with an estimated $15,000 more than what was already anticipated
in the budget, primarily due to the 0.5% additional cost-of-living increase in 2028. The added
costs for the years 2027, 2029, and 2030 are approximated to be $4,500 per year.
The overall contract remains largely unchanged. Additionally, the contract mirrors most of the
policy and budget applications experienced by non-represented staff. Thus, there remains a
great degree of parity between represented and non-represented employees.
Please see the attached tentative contract agreement for the years 2027-2030.

University Place City Hall
3609 Market Place West, Suite 200
University Place, WA 98466-4488

Tel 253.566.5656
Fax 253.566.5658

www.CityofUP.com

Business of the City Council
City of University Place, WA
Proposed Council Action:
Adopt a Resolution approving a Labor Agreement
with the International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local 612.

Agenda No.:

7E

Department:

Human Resources

Date:

October 19, 2026

Exhibits:

IUOE Local #612
Contract 2027-2030

Approved by City Manager:
Approved by City Attorney:
Approved by Finance Director:
Expenditure
Require: $0.00

Amount
Budgeted: $0.00

__________
__________
__________

Appropriation
Required: $0.00

SUMMARY/POLICY ISSUES
The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 612, (IUOE) represents the City’s Public Works Maintenance
Workers. City staff has negotiated with the IUOE to enter into a labor agreement beginning January 1, 2027 through
December 31, 2030. Largely, the Contract language will remain the same as in its previous iteration, apart from the few
exceptions highlighted below.
Highlights and Changes
Wages
Effective January 1, 2027, Union members shall be eligible for a 4.5% cost of living adjustment. On January 1, 2028,
Union members shall be eligible for a 3.5% cost of living adjustment. Beginning on January 1, 2029, and January 1, 2030,
Union members shall be eligible for a fixed 3% cost of living adjustment in each of those respective years.
Standby Duty
The rate of pay for standby will increase accordingly: $3.55 per hour of standby duty beginning January 1, 2027. On
January 1, 2028, the allowance will be $3.70 an hour. On January 1, 2029, the allowance will be $3.95 an hour. Starting
January 1, 2030, the allowance will be $4.15.
Before a second or additional employee responds to assist with a standby event, the employee must contact a supervisor
and receive prior approval to go to the scene.
City Logo Clothing
Beginning January 1, 2027, employees will receive City logo clothing to promote safety, security, and professionalism.
Each employee will receive one (1) hat, two (2) sweatshirts, eight (8) T-shirts, one (1) jacket, and one (1) set of rain gear.
Employees must wear, at minimum, a City logo T-shirt and ensure their outermost, public-facing garment displays the
City logo. No other type of logo or graphics/pictures/images are allowed.
Boot Allowance
The previous contract provided a yearly allowance of $500 to purchase work boots. Under the new agreement, the boot
allowance is increased to $550 per year. These allowances are prorated for employees who start work after the first of
the year and pass their initial probation period.
Commercial Driving License
For new employees hired after the ratification of this contract, the City will pay for one training course and one test to help
an employee obtain a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL). An employee who earns a City-funded CDL must remain
employed by the City for at least two (2) years. If the employee leaves before completing this commitment, the employee
must reimburse the City for cost of the training and test.
Dental and Vision
The Union has decided to opt for the same dental and vision plan currently in place for non-represented staff. This change
would be effective January 1, 2027.

BOARD OR COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
N/A

RECOMMENDATION/MOTION
MOVE TO:

Adopt a Resolution approving a Labor Agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local 612.

RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE, WASHINGTON, APPROVING
A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS, LOCAL #612
WHEREAS, the City has been engaged in contract negotiations with the International Union of
Operating Engineers (IUOE), Local #612; and
WHEREAS the parties have reached an agreement on a subsequent labor contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PLACE, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Approval of Form of Documents. The City Council hereby approves execution of the
Labor Agreement by and between the City of University Place and the International Union of Operating
Engineers, Local #612, in substantially the form of the documents accompanying this Resolution.
Section 2. Completion of Transaction. The City Manager or designee is authorized to take and
execute any additional measures or documents that may be necessary to complete this transaction, which
are consistent with the approved form of documents attached to this Resolution, and this Resolution.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption by the
City Council.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 19, 2026.

________________________________________
Stan Flemming, Mayor

ATTEST:

Emelita J. Genetia, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Matthew S. Kaser, City Attorney

LABOR AGREEMENT
By and Between
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE
and
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
LOCAL #612

Term of Agreement
January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2030

1

ARTICLE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

ARTICLE 1 RECOGNITION.....................................................................................3
ARTICLE 2 NON-DISCRIMINATION ....................................................................3
ARTICLE 3 UNION SECURITY ꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏꞏ 3
ARTICLE 4 MANAGEMENT RIGHTSAND RESPONSIBILITIES.....................4
ARTICLE 5 HOURS OF WORKAND OVERTIME .............................................. 5
ARTICLE 6 W AGES..................................................................................................6
ARTICLE 7 EMPLOYMENT .................................................................................. 9
ARTICLE 8 VACATIONS .....................................................................................10
ARTICLE 9 HOLIDAYS ........................................................................................ 11
ARTICLE 10 SICK LEAVE .................................................................................... 11
ARTICLE 11 COMPENSATED LEAVES OF ABSENCE .................................... 14
ARTICLE 12 UNPAID LEAVES OF ABSENCE................................................... 14
ARTICLE 13 GROUP INSURANCE: MEDICAL/DENTAL/LIFE ..................... 17
ARTICLE 14 RETIREMENT .................................................................................. 18
ARTICLE 15 WORKERS COMPENSATION ....................................................... 18
ARTICLE 16 GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE .......... 18
ARTICLE 17 NO STRIKE - NO LOCKOUT .......................................................... 21
ARTICLE 18 SEVERABILITY............................................................................... 21
ARTICLE 19 SAFETY AND SANITATION… .........................................................22
ARTICLE 20 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS ........................................................................ 22
ARTICLE 21 SUBCONTRACTING ..........................................................................22
ARTICLE 22 COMPLETE AGREEMENT................................................................22
ARTICLE 23 TERM OF AGREEMENT ....................................................................23
2

LABOR AGREEMENT
By and Between
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE
and
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 612
ARTICLE 1 - RECOGNITION
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of University Place, hereafter
referred to as the "City" or "Employer," for its operations listed below this 1 day of January,
2027, and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 612, hereinafter referred
to as the "Union." The Union shall represent all regular full-time and regular part-time (as
defined in the City's Personnel Policies) maintenance employees of the City of University Place
Public Works Operations Division, excluding supervisors, confidential employees, clerical
employees, seasonal and temporary employees, and all other employees. The City hereby
recognizes the Union as the sole and exclusive bargaining agent for its represented employees.
ARTICLE 2 - NONDISCRIMINATION
2.1

Neither the Employer, the Union nor any employee shall in any manner whatsoever
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color,
religion, creed, sex, sexual preference, marital status, national origin, age, or sensory, mental or
physical handicaps or disabilities. Nothing shall prevent the City from establishing bona fide
occupational qualifications (BFOQ), nor shall the City be required to make light duty available
apart from the job description.

2.2 No employee shall be discriminated against because of membership or lack thereof or lawful
activity in the Union, provided such activities are not carried on to interfere with the normal
work process.
ARTICLE 3 - UNION SECURITY
3.1 All non-probationary, represented employees described in Article 1 may be members of the Union
for the duration of this Agreement. The City shall provide for automatic payroll deductions from the
employee to the Union, the monthly amount of dues, upon receipt of signed authorization cards by
union members. Payroll deductions will be made retroactive to date agreed to by IUOE Local No.
612 and the employee. Any represented employee who wishes to cancel the written authorization for
dues deduction must notify the City and the Union in writing, at which time the City will discontinue
the deduction. Nothing in this Article shall conflict with applicable State or Federal statutes.
3.2 The Union agrees to hold the Employer harmless from any liability whatsoever that might ensue

3

as a result of actions taken to enforce Section 3.1 of this Article. The Union shall defend and
hold the City harmless against any and all claims, demands, suits, or other form of liability that
may arise out of or by reason of action taken or not taken by the City for the purpose of
complying with any of the provisions of Section 3.1.

3.3 An authorized representative of the Union shall have access to the City's workplace at reasonable
times for the purpose of investigation of grievances, adjusting disputes and ascertaining
adherence to this Agreement, provided that such visit shall not interfere with the work process
or cause undue interruption of the employees' work schedules. There shall be no more than one
(1) shop steward for each bargaining unit. The City agrees to release the Union Shop Steward
from work duties for grievance representation and labor negotiations, and the Union agrees to
reimburse the City for the employee's time; which reimbursement shall include salary and
benefits.
ARTICLE 4 - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 The Employer retains and reserves all powers and authority to manage its operations in an
effective manner with the sole and unquestioned right and prerogative in accordance with
applicable laws, regulations, and City ordinances and policies, subject only to the limitations
expressly stated in this Agreement. The following management rights and responsibilities are
examples, not intended to be all-inclusive:
1) To plan, direct, control and determine all the operations and services of the Employer;
2) To supervise, transfer, and direct the workforce, to establish the qualifications for
employment and to employ employees;
3) To schedule and assign work;
4) To establish work and performance standards and, from time to time, to change those
standards. Such standards may be used to determine acceptable performance levels, prepare
work schedules, and measure the performance of employees;
5) To assign overtime or not. The City has the right to schedule overtime work as required in a
manner most advantageous to the City and consistent with the requirements of municipal
employment and the public interest;
6) To determine the methods, means, organization and number of personnel by which such
operations and services shall be performed, or to subcontract work with either public or
private sector agencies, or assign work to other City non-bargaining unit personnel, in
accordance with Article 21;
7) To make and enforce reasonable rules and regulations;
8) To discipline, suspend and discharge employees for cause. Employees in their initial
probationary period are considered "at-will" employees and may be terminated for any
reason not expressly prohibited by law and without recourse to any grievance procedure;
9) To lay off employees for lack of work, funds, or the occurrence of conditions beyond the
4

control of the Employer or where such condition of work would be wasteful or unproductive;
10) To change or eliminate existing methods, equipment or facilities, including past practices;
11) To direct its employees to perform every incidental duty connected with operations, whether
or not enumerated in their job descriptions;
12) To apply the City's Personnel Policies & Procedures Manual, with the exception of
provisions concerning benefits, to members of this bargaining unit. However, in the event of
a conflict between a provision of this Agreement and any guideline, regulation, or rule of the
City, the provision of this Agreement shall control. In addition, the parties agree that the City
has the sole right to amend, modify, adopt, or change any such policies; provided that the
Union is given thirty (30) days' advance notice and has an opportunity to comment.
4.2

The City has the right at any time to require an employee to provide evidence of a valid
Washington State driver's license and CDL endorsement if such is required by the classification
or if the employee has or will at any time drive a City vehicle. Such requirement may include
having the employee sign a release of driving record, the payment of fee for which is to be paid
by the Employer.
ARTICLE 5 - HOURS OF WORK AND OVERTIME

5.1

The normal workweek for full-time employees shall be five (5) consecutive days of eight
(8) hours worked, exclusive of the lunch period, unless an alternate work schedule is scheduled
by the City. Work schedules other than the normal Monday through Friday schedule may be
established by the Employer to increase productivity and efficiency as determined by the
Employer. The City's standard workweek is 12:01 Sunday to Midnight the following Saturday.
However, the City may adjust the Monday-Friday workweek for one (1) or more employees in
order to accommodate alternate work schedules (e.g., four (4) day ten (10) hour workdays and
nine (9) 80's shifts).

5.2 Employees are allotted a 30-minute unpaid lunch break. Represented employees shall combine their
two 15-minute breaks and extend their unpaid lunch break by an additional 30 minutes. Thus,
represented employees shall have a total of 60 minutes for their lunch break. Lunch shall commence
when work stops and the employee travels to any location other than the Public Works shop.
Employees who choose to return immediately and directly to the Public Works shop to eat lunch shall
commence their lunch upon arrival at the Public Works shop.
5.3

Overtime is work performed beyond the forty (40) hour workweek of an employee as authorized.
Payment for such authorized overtime hours worked shall be at the rate of one and one-half
(1-1/2) the base hourly rate of pay. When computing time worked for qualification of overtime, time
paid for but not worked (e.g., holidays, sick leave, and vacation time) does not count as hours worked.

5.3.1 When an employee is requested by supervisor to report to work on a scheduled
day off, the employee shall be compensated at the overtime rate regardless of the
number of hours worked during the current week.

5

5.4

Payment for authorized overtime hours worked shall be paid unless compensatory time is
requested by the employee and approved by the City. Compensatory time shall be earned at the
appropriate overtime rate. As compensatory time represents an unfunded liability for the City,
the maximum accrual of compensatory time shall not exceed eighty (80) hours. Employees should
schedule the use of compensatory time with their supervisor within ninety (90) days of the date it is
earned, unless granted an extension, in writing, by the City Manager. If an employee is unable to use
accrued compensatory time within ninety (90) days, or compensatory time exceeds the maximum
accrual, overtime compensation will be paid at the current overtime rate. Every employee's
compensatory time accrual will be reviewed at year-end as part of budget preparation for the
following year. The City may elect to pay overtime or cash out compensatory time for pay at any time.

5.5

No pyramiding or double application of Sections and/or Articles is permitted. Compensation
shall not be paid more than once for the same hours under any provision or Section of this Article
or Agreement, unless expressly stated in each Section or Article. All shift trading or on-call
changes shall be approved in advance by the City so as not to require unnecessary overtime costs.
The workdays and work periods specified herein shall not constitute guaranteed hours of work.

ARTICLE 6-WAGES
6.1

Effective January 1, 2027, the Union shall be eligible for a 4.5% cost of living adjustment (COLA).
Effective January 1, 2028, the Union shall be eligible for a 3.5% cost of living adjustment (COLA),
3% COLA in January 2029 and 3% COLA in January 2030.
Each Classification shall have an associated salary range with identified steps (see Appendix A).
On an employee's anniversary start date of a position employees shall automatically advance one
full (1.0) step. Step increases shall not exceed salary ranges as set forth in Appendix A and are
subject to Section 6.1 of the contract.

6.2

The pay period shall not be less than twice monthly and shall be via direct deposit.

6.3

Standby Duty: The purpose of Standby Duty is to allow employees to: be available during offduty hours to receive service requests concerning problems; investigate the nature and
seriousness of the problem by on-site inspection; correct minor problems causing a hazard,
damage or potential damage, or significant inconveniences to the public; call out appropriate
crews when necessary; direct the crew to the site; perform work as a crew member if callback
should occur; and keep appropriate records.
The City, at its option, may assign Standby Duty to City employees to ensure that qualified
personnel are available to respond to emergencies that may affect public health, safety and/or
welfare.
Beginning upon the effective date of this agreement, a bargaining unit employee who serves on
evening, weekend, or holiday Standby Duty shall receive an allowance of $3.55 per hour of
Standby Duty beginning January 1, 2027. On January 1, 2028, the allowance will be $3.70 an
hour. On January 1, 2029, the allowance will be $3.95 an hour. Starting January 1, 2030, the
allowance will be $4.15.
Hours on Standby status are not considered hours worked and will not be counted for the purposes of
computing overtime pay or eligibility to receive benefits. Employees on Standby Duty who are called

6

out and employees who are called out to assist shall receive three (3) hours pay for each initial response
at the employee's overtime rate which shall be in addition to the Standby Duty allowance. Any assistant
standby employees require supervisor approval prior to the call out. To be eligible for an additional three (3) hour
guarantee, an employee must complete the original three-hour call out period (i.e., the original call out
period of three (3) hours must pass) and be back into a Standby status. If the employee is called out
less than three (3) hours from the time he or she is scheduled to start his or her regular shift, he or she
shall receive one and one half (1-1/2) times his or her regular straight-time hourly rate of pay only for
such time as occurs before his or her regular starting time.

Employees on Standby Duty or employees who are called out to assist the standby employee on
Sundays or Holidays shall receive four (4) hours of pay for each initial response at double the
employees’ hourly rate. To be eligible for an additional four (4) hour guarantee, an employee must
complete the original four-hour call out period and be back in Standby status.
Hours of Standby Duty shall be:

Evening Standby Duty. Evening Standby Duty shall commence at quitting time on the evening
of a work shift and continue through to 7:00 a.m. the following morning.
Saturday and Sunday Standby Duty. Saturday Standby Duty shall commence as of 7:00 a.m. on
Saturday and continue through to 6:59 a.m. the following morning. Sunday Standby Duty shall
commence as of 7:00 a.m. on Sunday morning and continue through 6:59 a.m. Monday morning.
Holiday Standby Duty. Holiday Standby Duty shall commence as of 7:00 a.m. on each Cityscheduled holiday and continue through to 6:59 a.m. on the morning following the holiday.
While on Standby Duty, employees are not required to stay at home or any other specific
location; however, employees on Standby Duty shall be assigned a cell phone provided by the
City and must be able to arrive at the incident location within one (1) hour of being called. If an
employee on Standby status fails to respond to a call to return to work, he or she may be subject
to disciplinary action as outlined in the City's personnel policies.
To ensure flexibility for the employee, the City encourages employees to participate in the
scheduling of Standby assignments. Employees are also encouraged to rotate their schedules.
Employees will not be eligible for standby duty and/or call-out when unavailable for work due to
sickness until they have returned and worked a full shift.
In the event of a personal emergency that precludes the Standby employee's ability to respond,
the employee must notify the Public Works Director, the Public Works Crew Chief, or the City
Manager (as a last resort) immediately to ensure the City's ability to respond to emergencies.
Designated Standby employees shall maintain themselves in a fit and responsible manner, able
to respond to an emergency call in a condition normally expected of an on-duty employee during
normal work hours, and consistent with all other City policies. Employees on Standby Duty shall
not consume or be under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances.
Employees on Standby Duty will record their Standby and call out hours on their timesheets,
even though Standby does not count as hours worked. Compensation for Standby pay will be
included on the employee's regular paycheck. The employee's supervisor will approve, in
advance, any Standby Duty served. This Agreement authorizes the City Manager to suspend or

7

amend this Standby policy to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal and State laws.

It is understood and agreed by the parties that should qualified Operating Engineers not be
available, or in cases of extreme emergency (i.e., danger of loss of life and/or property), the City
may take those actions it deems necessary and there will be no violation of this Agreement.
6.4 Allowances:
Beginning in January 2027 and every year thereafter, each represented employee will choose from
the following items from the City Catalog:
(1)
(2)
(8)
(1)
(1)

Hat with the City Logo
Sweatshirts with City Logo
T-shirts with City Logo (to include breathable hi-vis-options)
Jacket with City Logo
Rain gear with City Logo

Additional boot allowance of $550 to be provided by the City on the first regular paycheck of the
new fiscal year (approximately around January 20). The City’s regular pension contribution will
not apply to this allowance.
Represented employees shall wear City-logoed clothing whenever they are on duty. A minimum
of a city logoed t-shirt and outerwear constitute compliance with this section. No outside logoed
attire or no graphic pictures/images shall be acceptable.
For new employees, a complete set of required attire will be issued after completion of the
probationary period. Boot allowance will be prorated based on the completion of the probationary
period. All uniforms with City logo will be returned to the City when represented employees
leave city employment.

6.5 CDL License and Physicals: The City will pay for the represented staff the cost of one training
and one testing to obtain a CDL license if required for the classification. Employees must remain
with the City for a minimum of two (2) years following certification. Should an employee
separate from service from the City prior to the conclusion of this period (this will not apply if
an employee separates employment through no fault of their own like in the event of medical
separation or layoff), the employee shall reimburse the City for all costs associated with
obtaining the CDL license (including tuition fees, training expenses, etc.) Reimbursement may
be deducted from final wages or other compensation owed. This section applies only to
employees hired after the ratification of this contract.
The City will pay for the cost of CDL Physicals for represented staff who currently hold and
maintain CDL Licenses. In order to manage costs, the City reserves the right to determine where
the physical examinations occur.
If an employee loses a CDL License due to misconduct or by failing testing requirements for a CDL,
the City will no longer pay for any CDL-required physical for the duration of that represented
employee's employment.

8

ARTICLE 7 - EMPLOYMENT
7.1 Seniority: Except as provided in Secti