On the agenda: Milford meeting — Flock camera (Sep 14)

BOARD OF ALDERMEN
PUBLIC HEARING
August 3,2026
A Public Hearing was held on Monday, August 3, 2026, in the aldermanic chambers of City Hall.
Chairman Vetro opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL

Board Members

Also Present

K. All

R. Smith, Mayor
P. Smith, City Clerk

S. Bannon
B. Bevan
M. Brennan

H. Mulrenan, Chief of Staff

M. Casey
J. Federico

P. Healy
C. Hite
A. Fowler
A. Lombard!

M. Smith
W. Smith, III
W. Smith, Jr.
P. Vetro

Excused:

R. Pacelli

PUBLIC HEARING
a) 68 Stowe Avenue - Consideration of proposed lease pursuant to CGS §8-24.
Chairman Vetro opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. He asked if anyone wished to speak
concerning the matter:
Speakers Jn Favor -

B. Silver, 55 Governors Avenue, and Chaiman of the Milford Historic Preservation Commission spoke
in favor of the lease.

S. Patrick, President of Walnut Beach Arts and Business Association,, spoke regarding use of the
property. She discussed obtaining historic recognition of the barn from the State of Connecticut in

1

2025. Ms. Patrick provided a handout showing the barn's current state. She discussed initial steps of
hosting a farmers market and future use as an indoor winter market and community center.
R. Silver, 55 Governors Avenue, spoke in favor of the lease.
D. Fisher, 70 Stowe Avenue, spoke in favor of the lease and the use as a cultural and community
center.

K. Thompson, spoke in favor the lease.
E. Johnson, 40 Benson Street, spoke in favor of the lease.
M. Rea, 37 Devonshire Road, spoke in favor of the lease.
Speakers in Opposition - None

Chairman Vetro closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m.
Being no further business, Aid. Healv and Aid. W. Smith, III made and seconded a motion to adjourn.
MotioTLcarried unanimously.

The Board adjourned at 7:16 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,

I ^->^^U^-^T-^^
Toni Jo Weeks

Recording Secretary

2

BOARD OF ALDERMEN
REGULAR MEETING
August 3,2026
The Board of Aldermen of the City of Milford held their regular meeting on Monday,
August 3,2026, in the Aldermanic Chambers at City Hall. Chairman Vetro called the
meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Vetro asked those present to join in saluting
our flag and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. Roll Call
Board Members

Also Present

K. All

R. Smith, Mayor

S. Bannon
B. Bevan
M. Brennan

P. Smith, City Clerk
M. Woods, Assistant City Attorney
H. Mulrenan, Chief of Staff

M. Casey
J. Federico

P. Healy
C. Hite
A. Fowler
A. Lombard!

M. Smith

W. Smith, III
W. Smith, Jr.
P. Vetro

Excused:

R. Pacelli
2. Public Statements

Chairman Vetro stated public statements are limited to the legislative function of the
Board of Aldermen. He stated only residents; taxpayers or electors may address the
Board. The time limit granted to each speaker shall be three (3) minutes. He asked
each speaker to adhere to the three-minute limit.

R. Merva, 90 Dart Hill Road, spoke in favor of the community block grant funding and
asked for the Board's approval.
D. Rhea, 18 Pearl Street, spoke regarding golf carts on streets and low speed vehicles.
She also spoke regarding Flock cameras.

1

B. Baxter, 56 Bray Avenue, spoke regarding Board of Assessment Appeals and ADA
coordinator.

P. Patrikios, Dock Road, spoke regarding changes in driving habits following installation
of speed cameras and limits of use of funds received from fees.
J. Bonnanzio, 17 Pearl Hill Street, spoke regarding the Ul Milvon project.
L. Tarver, 83 Quirk Road, discussed increased volume ofe-bikes and golf carts.
C. Ramos, 28 Pearl Hill Street, spoke regarding the Ul Milvon project.
Spoke aciainst Flock, ALPR, red light and speed cameras:

K. Kilgore, 68 Cornfield Road
C. Haller, 75 Peak Avenue

S. Wood, 198 Gulf Street
T. Amrosecchio, 10 Flax Mill Lane
E. Gore, 198 Gulf Street
J. Lewis, 205 Gulf Street
M. Lofthouse

C. Lancia, 87 Naugatuck Avenue
A. Rice, 35 Quaker Place
A. Piazza, 81 Crestwood Road
A. Petretta, 92 Plains Road
T. DiBlasi, 25 Roselle Street
J. DiDonato, Caswell Cove Condominium
R. Coombs, 10 Elsenhower Drive

C. Fava, 15 Apple Hill Drive
J. Nichols, 67 Berwyn Street
D. Able, 236 Lookout Hill Road
L Hull, 19 Silver Street
B. Hull, 16 Tremont Street
E. VanChot, 858 New Haven Avenue
C. Merced, 64 Salem Walk

P. Mokund, 71 Dayton Avenue
G. Lucas, 181 Home Acres Avenue
N. Green, 85 Viscount Drive

D. Danna, 21 Maple Street
K. Padden,
R. Padden, 41 West Orland Street
I. Stewart, 94 Corona Drive
K. Stem, 185 Nettleton Avenue
S. Visconti, Robert Street

C. Fitzgerald, 7 Central Avenue
R. Fitzgerald, 7 Central Avenue

2

K. Long, 66 Seaflower Road
R. Piselli, 1093 West River Street
C. Urbain, 1 Warren Street
D. Roy, 50 Autumn Ridge Road
M. Brenner, 180 Cherry Street
K. Francis, 1 Gilette Street

S. Bromley, 27 Norway Street
D. Lawless, 342 Foxwood Lane
B. Lawless, 41 Pauline Street

J. Guglielmi, 970 East Broadway
J, 7 Greenview Lane
A. Sabel, 461 Swanson Crescent
J. Cavallo, 70 Ocean Avenue
A. Certa, 19 Arlmont Street

J. Dennison, Whitney Avenue
J. Farina, 31 Bonsilene Street

M. Sordi, 35 Prospect Street
B. Wargo, 357 Plains Road
M. Wargo, 357 Plains Road,
R. Jackson, Loomis Street
M. Gibbs, 38 Elaine Road

D. Zito, 540 Woodruff Road
S. VanFleet, 445 Milford Point Road
D. Filona, Unknown

3. Consideration of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Board Aldermen held
on July6, 2026.
Aid. hlealy and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the
Reaylar Meeting of the Board Aldermen held on July 6, 20^6. Motion carried
unanimously.

4. Consideration of the Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Board of Aldermen:
Board of Aldermen Ordinance Committee Special Meeting and Public Hearing held on
July 6, 2026.
Aid. Healy and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the
Board of Aldermen Ordinance Committee Special Meeting and Public Hearina held on
July 6, 2026. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Chairman's Report and Communications

Chairman Vetro yielded his report to Chief Mello, Milford Police Department
Chief Mello discussed the department's commitment to remaining on the cutting edge of
public safety and ensuring the safety of both officers and the community. He stated that

3

tools of the trade are essential and continually evolving. He referenced the Public Safety
Plan submitted to the Board of Aldermen in 2024 and reviewed the state law governing
automatic traffic safety enforcement devices (ATSEDs). He explained that the department
examined available data to determine whether such a program would be effective in
Milford.

Chief Mello stated that speeding is the number-one complaint in Milford and that the
department evaluated how best to address this concern, with a primary focus on school
zones. He explained that this led to a review ofATSEDs and the development of a plan
presented to the Board, along with an overview of the applicable state statutes. The
ordinance was ultimately adopted on a bipartisan basis. The program proceeded through
an RFP process and a vendor was selected. He noted that, under statute, all fines must
be used to improve traffic safety. Public hearings were held on the plan, and a survey
was distributed to parents of school-aged children. Eighty-five percent of respondents
indicated support for enforcement. Chief Mello reviewed data collected during the initial
deployment period, noting that compliance increased to approximately 85% within 30
days, demonstrating a measurable change in driver behavior. Chief Mello outlined the
process for changing speed limits and emphasized that speed cameras are triggered
solely by a vehicle exceeding the posted limit. The system captures only the license plate
and includes a video showing the vehicle's speed. He stated the cameras are calibrated
daily. Chief Mello discussed the use of video cameras in public spaces following 9/11,
noting that such cameras are strictly for law-enforcement purposes and are not accessible
to outside parties, hie reviewed the department's efforts to replace aging video cameras
and license plate readers (LPRs), explaining that LPRs previously mounted on vehicles
have been transitioned to a fixed-Iocation program. He referenced other municipalities
that have installed LPRs and described their effectiveness. He stated that Milford's goal
is to ensure coverage at all major entry points into the City, including 1-95, the Merritt
Parkway, and Stratford and West Haven borders. Chief Mello discussed crimes
committed using stolen vehicles and license plates and stated that LPRs provide the
ability to identify when a wanted individual enters the City. He addressed constitutional
concerns, stating that if the devices were unlawful, the State would not permit their
installation. He reiterated that the cameras capture only license plates. The database
exists so that, in the event of a serious crime, investigators may review relevant data to
assist in solving the case. He described the training and credentials required to access
LPR data, noting that not all police personnel have access. He stated he is sensitive to
misuse of data in other communities and emphasized the importance of audits. He noted
that data collected is not intended to be shared and that a restrictive policy—supported
by the ACLU—was adopted and must be followed by all police departments. He reviewed
statutory data-retention limits of 21 days and the narrow circumstances under which
searches are permitted. Chief Mello discussed statutory limits on where cameras may
be installed and reviewed data-retention requirements under CHEPA for managing
criminal-justice information. He stated that vendors who mismanage data risk losing their
license to operate in Connecticut. hie reviewed crime-solve statistics over the past two
years. Chief Mello concluded by stating that if Milford were the only community along the
1-95 corridor to remove its cameras, he believes crimes committed in neighboring towns
would shift toward Milford.

4

6. Mayor's Report and Recommendations

Mayor Smith thanked all those who attended and spoke this evening. He reported on
the swearing-in of new Fire Chiefs and other officials. Mayor Smith reviewed the 250th
anniversary celebrations and the open houses held throughout the City. He Smith
requested the Board's approval of items 8(a) through 8(c).
Aid. Federico requested a 5-minute recess
Chairman Vetro recessed at 11:13 p.m.
Chairman Vetro reconvened at 11:35 p.m.
7. Unfinished Business
None

8. New Business (from Mayor's Report Items 8a throuah 8c).

(8a) Aid. Healy and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to approve, per the
recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission dated June 2, 2026, pursuant to
CGS § 8-24, for the lease of 68 Stowe Avenue, and to authorize the Mayor and Citv
Attorney to take all steps necessary includinci sicinina all documents, to effectuate said
lease.

Aid. Casey referenced comments made at the last meeting concerning large events.
Mayor Smith discussed a petition submitted by neighbors opposing the use of the
Stowe Barn as a major event venue, hie stated that, following meetings and discussion,
the lease was amended to exclude such events. The neighbors were satisfied with the
resolution and supported the amendment. Aid. Mealy stated he is in favor of the lease
and noted the historic value of the barn. Aid. W. Smith, III, noted that the lease term is

25 years, which is the minimum required to obtain grant funding.
Motion carried unanimously.

(8b) Aid. Mealy and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to approve a
Resolution Re: Grant Application for Consolidated Housinq and Community
Development Plan.

Aid. W. Smith, Jr., noted that 28% of the grant funding is allocated to administration.
Aid. Lombard! asked for clarification regarding the administration costs. Lauren Kelly,
CDBG Administrator, stated that the administration portion covers her salary and
benefits, as well as consultants and project managers hired to support residential repair
projects. She added that it also includes marketing, membership expenses that support
the program, and office supplies. She noted that the CDBG Coordinator position is
funded through the grant and not through the City budget. Aid. W. Smith, Jr., noted a
typographical error in the resolution. He asked Ms. Kelly to confirm the actual amount.

5

Ms. Kelly stated there is in fact a typographical error and the correct amount is
$512,885.
Aid. W. Smith, Jr., and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to amend the second
paragraph of the resolution to read as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Milford is entitled to receive five hundred twelve
thousand eight hundred eiqhty-five dollars ($512,885) from said Act; and

Amendment carried unanimously.

Main motion, as amended, carried unanimously.

(8c) Aid. Healy and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to approve a
Resolution Re: State Connecticut Early VotinQ Grant.

Aid. W. Smith, III, stated that he spoke with the Registrar of Voters to confirm whether
the entire amount is being used for early-voting expenses, or will be spread between the
primary and general elections. He noted that the funding will be used for both.
Motion carried unanimously.

9. New Business not on the Agenda that may be introduced by a two-thirds (2/3) vote
of those present and voting.
W. Smith, III and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to add to the aaenda
consideration of A Resolution to Impose a Temporary Moratorium on the Use of Flock
Grou^lnc. and Other Cameras and to Direct a Review of the Current Program.

Aid. Healy stated that the hour was late and that the resolution received this evening
would be better addressed by adding it to the September agenda. Chairman Vetro
agreed, noting that a significant amount of information had been presented and that the
topic deserved sufficient time for review at the September meeting. Discussion ensued
regarding the resolution language and the time needed to review and discuss it at a
future meeting. Aid. W. Smith, Jr., suggested placing the item on the agenda and then
tabling it until the next meeting. Aid. W. Smith, III, stated that the matter before the
Board is a resolution, not an ordinance. He noted that the resolution would not change
the underlying ordinance but would allow time to address the camera system. Aid.
Lombard! stated that one of the most important responsibilities of an alderman is
representation of the public. She stated she is in favor of placing the item on the agenda
and tabling it until the September meeting.
Aid. Healy requested a 5-minute recess
Chairman Vetro recessed at 11:56 p.m.
Chairman Vetro reconvened at 12:12 a.m.

6

Aid. Healy stated that the matter requires further study and careful consideration of all
information received. He noted that allowing the resolution to be added to the agenda
and then tabled will provide the necessary time for a proper and thorough review.
Motion carried unanimously.

Aid. Federico and Aid. Healyjnade and seconded a motion tojable the resolution to the
September meeting.

Aid. W. Smith, Jr., stated that the resolution calls for a study to be completed within 90
days and, for that reason, he does not see a need to table the item. Aid. Healy stated
that the resolution, as drafted, pauses the entire system and therefore requires careful
consideration and may need to be reworded.
Motion carried 8 in favor (Bannon, Bevan, Brennan, Federico, Healy, Hite, M. Smith,
Vetro), 6 against.(Ali, Case, Fowler, Lombardi, W. Smith, Jr, W^mith, III).
10. Budget Memo Transfers.
Aid. Healy and Aid. Fowler made and seconded a motion to approve Budget Memo
Transfers #7 and #8, Funds 1005 & 2812, FY26. Motion carried unanimously.
11. Refunds
None.
12. Report of Standing Committees

a. Ordinance Committee - no report
b. Public Safety and Welfare Committee - no report
c. Public Works Committee - no report
d. Claims Committee - no report.
e. Rules Committee - no report.
f. Personnel Committee - no report.
13. Report of Special Committees.

a. Liaison Sub-Committee - Board of Education - no report.
b. Liaison Sub-Committee - Flood & Erosion - no report.

c. Liaison Sub-Committee - Park, Beach & Recreation Comm. - no report.
d. Liaison Sub-Committee - Planning & Zoning Board - no report.
e. Liaison Sub-Committee - Sewer Commission - no report
f. Liaison Sub-Committee - Harbor Management Commission - no report.
g. Liaison - Council on Aging - no report.
h. Liaison Sub-Committee - Library Board - no report.

7

Liaison Sub-Committee - Veterans Ceremony & Parade Commission - no report
j. Liaison Sub-Committee - Fine Arts - no report
k. Liaison Sub-Committee - Milford Redevelopment & Housing Partnership - no
report

1. Liaison - Golf Course Commission - no report.
m. Liaison - Inland Wetlands Agency - no report
n. Liaison - Board of Health - no report.
o. Liaison - Human Services Commission - no report.
p. Liaison Sub-Committee - Pension & Retirement Board - no report.
q. Liaison Sub-Committee - Milford Government Access Television (MGAT) - no
report.

r. Liaison - Economic Development Commission - no report.
s. Liaison Sub-Committee - Milford Arts Council - no report.
t. Liaison Sub-Committee - Milford Progress, Inc. - no report.
u. Liaison Sub-Committee - Fire Commission - no report.
v. Liaison Sub-Committee - Police Commission - no report.
w. Permanent School Facilities Building Committee - no report.

14. Executive Session. A two-thirds (2/3) vote of those present and voting is required for
any item to be considered in executive session. A two-thirds (2/3) vote of those present
and voting is required to go into executive session.
Being no further business to discuss, Aid. W. Smith, III and Aid. Fowler made and
seconded a motion to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.

The Board adjourned at 12:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,

\ Qj^L^g, L3djLJo-^
Toni Jo Weeks

Recording Secretary

8

BOARD OF ALDERMEN
SPECIAL MEETING
August 27, 2026
The Board of Aldermen of the City of Milford held their Special meeting on Thursday,
August 27, 2026, in the Parsons Government Center Auditorium, Chairman Vetro called
the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and asked those present to join in saluting our flag
and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. Roll Call
Board Members

Also Present

K. Ali
S. Bannon
B. Bevan
M. Brennan
M. Casey
J. Federico
P. Healy
C. Hite
A. Lombardi
R. Pacelli
M. Smith
W. Smith, III
W. Smith, Jr.
P. Vetro

R. Smith, Mayor
P. Smith, City Clerk
J. Berchem, City Attorney
H. Mulrenan, Chief of Staff

Excused:
A. Fowler

Chairman Vetro stated that this is a special meeting. He noted that public comment is
not typically included in special meetings, but due to the level of public interest, a public
comment period was added for this meeting.
Ald. W. Smith, III and Ald. W. Smith, Jr., made and seconded a motion to reorder the
agenda to allow for public comment to be first.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated that executive session is traditionally placed at the end of the
agenda and expressed that he believes it should be moved. Ald. Pacelli stated that
public comment is typically not included in a special meeting, and believes the Board
needs to be fully informed before moving forward with the agenda items. Ald. W. Smith,

1

III, stated that public comment is permitted at special meetings and that he believes it is
important to hear from the public prior to addressing the other items on the agenda.
Motion carried, 10 in favor (Ali, Bannon, Bevan, Brennan, Casey, Hite, Lombardi, M.
Smith, W. Smith, Jr., W. Smith, III), 4 against (Federico, Healy, Pacelli, Vetro).
3. Public Comment
Chairman Vetro stated public statements are limited to the legislative function of the
Board of Aldermen. He stated only residents, taxpayers or electors may address the
Board. The time limit granted to each speaker shall be three (3) minutes. He asked
each speaker to adhere to the three-minute limit.
Spoke against Flock, ALPR, red light and speed cameras:
E. VanChot
A. Rice
G. Baddington
A. Patretta
A. Beers
J. Fowler
R. Jackson
T. Burns
A. Wallace
N. Padiwicz
Daniel
Richard
M.J. Shannon
P. Shine
J. Ringwald
M. Lofthouse
N. Barrett
S. Bromley
Unknown
W. Hagedorn
Unknown
M. Divon
A. Columb
Christian
Unknown
Tim
J. McGreery
E.Smith
Unknown
W. Luxter
Unknown

2

Unknown
Wes
M. Soldi
T. Amberzechio
G. Cavallo
Unknown
D. Spicer
Unknown
Dominic
T. Aiken
Spoke in favor of Flock, ALPR, red light and speed cameras:
G. Scarvelis
M. Hawley
N. Austin
Spoke neither in favor or against Flock, APLR, red light and speed cameras:
G. Browski
Erica
Ald. W. Smith, III requested a 2-minute recess
Chairman Vetro recessed at 9:35 p.m.
Chairman Vetro reconvened at 9:45 p.m.
2. Executive Session. A two-thirds (2/3) vote of those present and voting is required for
any item to be considered in executive session.
(a)
Discuss pending litigation - City of Milford and Milford Police Department,
SBLR Case# MPP-359980
Chairman Vetro requested a motion to enter into executive session. He stated that
those attending executive session would be the full Board, Mayor Richard Smith, Chief
of Staff Holly Mulrenan, City Attorney Jonathan Berchem and Assistant City Attorney
Debra Kelly.
Ald. Pacelli and Ald. Healy made and seconded a motion to enter into executive
session.
Motion failed, 6 against (Ali, Bevan, Casey, Lombardi, W. Smith, Jr., W. Smith, III), 8 in
favor (Bannon, Brennan, Federico, Healy, Hite, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro).
Ald. Pacelli and Ald. Healy made and seconded a motion to reconsider a motion to
enter into executive session.

3

Ald. Pacelli explained that the purpose of the executive session was for the Board to be
briefed on pending litigation. He stated that it is important for the Board to understand
the nature of the pending litigation before considering the next action items. Ald. Pacelli
asked the City Attorney to confirm that pending litigation cannot be discussed in public.
City Attorney Jonathan Berchem confirmed that discussion of pending litigation is not
conducted in public session. Ald. W. Smith, III, raised a point of order that the motion to
reconsider is not appropriate pursuant to Roberts Rules of Order. He stated in order to
present a motion to reconsider you must be on the prevailing side of the motion.
4. New Business
(a)
Ald. Pacelli and Ald. Healy made and seconded a motion to approve a
Resolution Re: A Moratorium on the use of Automated Traffic Enforcement Safety
Devices (ATESD), a Pause on the Installation of Additional ATESD, and Review of the
City's ATESD Program.
RESOLUTION RE: A MORATORIUM ON THE USE OF AUTOMATED
TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT SAFETY DEVICES (ATESD), A PAUSE ON
THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL ATESD, AND REVIEW OF THE
CITY'S ATESD PROGRAM
WHEREAS, C.G.S. § 14-307c authorizes a municipality to use automated
traffic enforcement safety devices ("ATESDs") at locations within school
zones, pedestrian safety zones and other locations within the municipality,
provided that the municipality adopts an ordinance in accordance with the
statute and the locations of such devices are identified in a plan approved
by the Connecticut Department of Transportation pursuant to C.G.S. § 14307e; and
WHEREAS, C.G.S. § 14-307c also requires that an ordinance adopted
pursuant to that section provide for the citation hearing procedures
established by C.G.S. § 7-152c and specifies the procedures governing
the issuance and mailing of ATESD citations; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2024, the Board of Aldermen voted to adopt
Ordinance Section 14-60, et. seq. “Use of automated traffic safety
enforcement devices” and on March 3, 2025, approved the City of Milford
ATESD Plan (the “Plan”), which was thereafter submitted to and approved
by the Connecticut Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, Section 14-60 of the Milford Code of Ordinances currently
authorizes the use of ATESDs at locations within school zones, pedestrian
safety zones and other locations within the City identified in the Plan,
subject to the public hearing and approval requirements established
therein; and

4

WHEREAS, Sections 14-60 through 14-71 of the Milford Code of
Ordinances presently establish a regulatory framework governing the
City's ATESD program, including the use and operation of ATESDs, the
issuance and mailing of citations, fines, citation hearings, appeals,
defenses and the disclosure, retention and destruction of information and
data; and
WHEREAS, residents of the City have expressed concerns and raised
questions regarding the City's use and administration of ATESDs,
including the appropriate locations and hours for speed-camera
enforcement, the amount of fines imposed, the escalation of fines for
subsequent violations, the procedures available to persons wishing to
contest citations, and the receipt of citations by persons who lease motor
vehicles; and
WHEREAS, ATESD technology serves a fundamental public-safety
purpose, particularly in areas where speeding creates a heightened risk to
students, pedestrians and other vulnerable road users, but also
recognizes the importance of ensuring that the City's use of such
technology is appropriately limited, transparent, proportionate and
consistent with the expectations of the Milford community; and
WHEREAS, a moratorium on the operation of existing ATESDs and the
installation of additional ATESDs will provide an appropriate period during
which the Board, City officials and members of the community may review
the City's ATESD program, the Plan, the City's ATESD ordinance and the
concerns raised regarding the use and administration of ATESDs; and
WHEREAS, if the City continues to utilize ATESDs following such review,
their use should be more narrowly focused on speed enforcement in
school zones during specified hours and should include fines and
procedures that are proportionate to the nature of the violations and
provide appropriate opportunities for persons to contest citations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Aldermen of
the City of Milford hereby imposes a moratorium, commencing on the date
following approval of this Resolution, on the operation and use of all
currently installed ATESDs and on the installation of any additional
ATESDs within the City of Milford; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that during the moratorium, a Public Safety
Technology Review Committee established by the Mayor shall review the
City's Comprehensive Traffic Safety Plan and Sections 14-60 through 1471 of the Milford Code of Ordinances and shall make recommendations to
the Ordinance Committee of the Board of Aldermen concerning the use,
operation and administration of ATESDs within the City; and

5

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the recommendations of the
Public Safety Technology Review Committee, the Ordinance Committee
shall consider amendments to Sections 14-60 through 14-71, as
appropriate, to ensure that the ATESD program provides clear and
transparent requirements concerning the locations and hours of operation
of speed cameras, the issuance and mailing of citations, identification of
the person legally responsible for a leased motor vehicle, citation hearings
and appeals, review of recorded images, privacy and data-retention
requirements, and other safeguards necessary to ensure compliance with
C.G.S. §§ 14-307c through 14-307h and other applicable law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that nothing in this Resolution shall be
construed to amend, repeal, suspend or otherwise modify Sections 14-60
through 14-71 of the Milford Code of Ordinances, the City's
Comprehensive Traffic Safety Plan, or any approval issued by the
Connecticut Department of Transportation, and that any substantive
changes to the City's ATESD program shall be accomplished through
such ordinance, Plan and approval processes as may be required by
applicable law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon completion of its review, the
Ordinance Committee shall report its recommendations to the Board of
Aldermen, including any proposed amendments to Sections 14-60 through
14-71 and, if appropriate, any proposed amendments to the City's
Comprehensive Traffic Safety Plan requiring approval pursuant to C.G.S.
§ 14-307e and Section 14-60 of the Milford Code of Ordinances.
Ald. W. Smith, III and Ald. Ali made and seconded a motion to amend striking the
resolution in its entirety and replacing with the following:
A moratorium on the use of automated traffic enforcement safety devices
(ATESD), a pause on the installation of additional ATESD, and review of
the city's ATESD and ALPR program and a moratorium on the use,
deployment, retention, oversight and codification of the city's automated
license plate reader (ALPR) program.
Ald. W. Smith noted that he provided a copy of the proposed amendment to the
members of the Board. He stated that the “Whereas” clauses are copied and pasted
from both of the Mayor’s proposed resolutions. While not all of the “Whereas” clauses
from both resolutions, but it does incorporate some of them. Ald. W. Smith, III
continued with his amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Aldermen of the
City of Milford as follows:

6

Section 1. Moratorium. Effective immediately upon adoption of this
resolution, there is hereby imposed a complete moratorium on:
a.

All use, installation, activation, or expansion of any Flock Cameras,
fixed ALPR network or the operation and use of all currently installed
ATESDs and on the installation of any additional ATESDs within the
City of Milford.

b.

All fines that have been issued and paid by City of Milford residents
shall be reimbursed to said residents of the City of Milford.

c.

All fines that have been issued and unpaid or will be imminently
issued to City of Milford residents shall be immediately cancelled.

d.

This moratorium shall not apply to mobile ALPRs installed on or
operated from Milford Police Department Vehicles.

e.

This moratorium shall not require the deactivation of cameras used at
or for the protection of the Milford Public Schools provided that such
cameras are not being used as fixed ALPRs to continuously collect or
retain license plate data from the general public.

f.

No fixed or stationary ALPR shall be reactivated and no additional
fixed or stationary ALPR shall be installed or activated without further
action of the Board of Aldermen.

Section 2. Comprehensive Review. The Ordinance Committee of the
Board of Aldermen along with the other members of the Board of
Aldermen, is hereby directed to prepare and submit to the Board of
Aldermen a plan for effectuating the complete termination of the Flock or
other cameras as referenced herein.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Ald. W. Smith, III, stated that the intent of the resolution is not to vote on the matters
separately but to combine the resolutions, and that the action contemplated is
termination, not a pause and review. Ald. Lombardi asked the City Attorney whether
fines already issued could be reimbursed. Attorney Berchem stated that he does not
believe the Board has any authority beyond that provided by statute, and that fines
which have been lawfully imposed and collected cannot be reimbursed. He explained
that under the applicable statutory framework, any pause or termination of enforcement
may operate prospectively, but cannot be applied retroactively.
Ald. Pacelli requested a 10-minute recess
Chairman Vetro recessed at 10:02 pm.

7

Chairman Vetro reconvened at 10:12 p.m.
Ald. Ali and Ald. W. Smith, III made and seconded a motion to amend Section 1 of the
foregoing amendment offered by Ald. W. Smith, III as follows:
Section 1. Moratorium. Effective immediately upon adoption of this
resolution, there is hereby imposed a complete moratorium on:
a.

All use, installation, activation, or expansion of any Flock Cameras,
fixed ALPR network or the operation and use of all currently installed
ATESDs and on the installation of any additional ATESDs within the
City of Milford with the exception of police body cameras or body
camera technology like AXON or otherwise.

b.

All fines that have been issued and paid by City of Milford residents
shall be reimbursed to said residents of the City of Milford.

c.

All fines that have been issued and unpaid or will be imminently
issued to City of Milford residents shall be immediately cancelled.

d.

This moratorium shall not apply to mobile ALPRs installed on or
operated from Milford Police Department Vehicles.

e.

This moratorium shall not require the deactivation of cameras used at
or for the protection of the Milford Public Schools provided that such
cameras are not being used as fixed ALPRs to continuously collect or
retain license plate data from the general public.

f.

No fixed or stationary ALPR shall be reactivated and no additional
fixed or stationary ALPR shall be installed or activated without further
action of the Board of Aldermen.

Amendment offered by Ald. Ali and Ald. W. Smith, III, failed 9 against (Bannon, Bevan,
Brennan, Federico, Healy, Hite, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro),5 in favor (Ali, Casey,
Lombardi, W. Smith, Jr., W. Smith, III).
Ald. Lombardi stated that she is strongly in favor of the amendment, noting that it is
intended to protect the citizens of Milford. She commended the Police Department for its
work and stated that supporting the Department does not require supporting every
technology that becomes available. She indicated she will be voting yes. Ald. W. Smith,
III, stated that now is the opportunity to do what Milford residents have been clear
about, which is to remove the cameras. Ald. Casey referenced a statement made by
Chief Mello regarding trust in government and large institutions, noting that it resonated
with him. He stated he will be voting yes. Ald. W. Smith, Jr., reiterated that he has
consistently stated his position that all cameras should be removed from Milford. He
stated that the amendment is the strongest mechanism available to accomplish that

8

goal and that approving it would be a significant first step toward where he believes the
City needs to be. He noted that while he recognizes the value of policing, he believes
individual liberties outweigh that value. Ald. Ali stated that had he been on the Board
when the cameras were originally approved, he would have voted against them. He
stated that he respects the Police Department and its concerns and will vote in favor of
the amendment. Ald. Healy discussed the Connecticut “reasonable standard” and
stated that the Mayor’s proposal reflects that standard. He stated that he supports a
moratorium on the traffic cameras. He further stated that ALPRs are paramount to
policing and that he is not seeking to expand their use.
Original amendment offered by Ald. W. Smith, III, and Ald. Ali failed 9 against (Bannon,
Bevan, Brennan, Federico, Healy, Hite, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro), 5 in favor (Ali, Casey,
Lombardi, W. Smith, Jr., W. Smith, III).
Ald. W. Smith, III and Ald. Casey made and seconded a motion to amend to the
resolution as follows:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that during the moratorium, a Public Safety
Technology Review Committee established by the Mayor, which
Committee shall include the majority and minority leader, shall review the
City's Comprehensive Traffic Safety Plan and Sections 14-60 through 1471 of the Milford Code of Ordinances and shall make recommendations to
the Ordinance Committee of the Board of Aldermen concerning the use,
operation and administration of ATESDs within the City including potential
complete termination of ATESDs within the City; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the recommendations of the
Public Safety Technology Review Committee, the Ordinance Committee
shall consider amendments to Sections 14-60 through 14-71, as
appropriate, to ensure that the ATESD program provides clear and
transparent requirements concerning the locations and hours of operation
of speed cameras, the issuance and mailing of citations, identification of
the person legally responsible for a leased motor vehicle, citation hearings
and appeals, review of recorded images, privacy and data-retention
requirements, and other safeguards necessary to ensure compliance with
C.G.S. §§ 14-307c through 14-307h and other applicable law or the
process of complete termination of ATESDs within the City if the Review
Committee and the Board of Aldermen representatives deem appropriate.
Ald. Pacelli asked for clarification as to whether the committee would have the authority
to terminate. Ald. W. Smith, III, clarified that the amendment would allow the committee
to recommend termination if deemed necessary. Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated that the
underlying resolution is flawed, but the amendment addresses several of the issues. He
stated that there is currently no authority granted to the committee to consider
termination of the cameras, and that the amendment would allow that consideration. He
further stated the amendment would place one alderman from each party on the

9

committee, who could then report back to the Board. Ald. Hite asked whether the Board
members would be added as liaisons or as members. Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated they
would be added as full committee members. Ald. Brennan stated she does not agree
with the proposed language but does agree the Board of Aldermen should appoint or
approve the committee and would like for this to happen as soon possible.
Ald. Brennan and Ald. Pacelli made and seconded a motion amending the foregoing
amendment offered by W. Smith, III to include the following:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee be confirmed by the Board of Aldermen at their September 14,
2026 meeting.
Ald. W. Smith, III asked for clarification of the amendment proposed by Ald. Brennan.
Ald. Brennan stated that she believes the committee should be a Board of Aldermen
committee appointed by the Board. She further stated that a timeline for establishing the
committee should be set, and that it is not appropriate to specify that the Majority and
Minority Leaders serve on the committee; however, she agreed that Board members
should be included as part of the committee. Ald. Pacelli stated that he is in favor of the
resolution as amended by Ald. W. Smith, III and Ald. Brennan. He noted that what is
most important is that a committee is in place and that the work moves forward.
Ald. Pacelli requested a 5-minute recess
Chairman Vetro recessed at 10:39 p.m.
Chairman Vetro reconvened at 10:43 p.m.
Amendment offered by Ald. Brennan and Ald. Pacelli passed unanimously.
Original amendment offered by Ald. W. Smith, III and Ald. Casey, as amended, passed
unanimously.
Ald. M. Smith stated that he works in government relations services. He clarified that he
has no government business in Milford and does not represent any business being
discussed at this meeting. He stated that he is proud to live in Milford and in
Connecticut, which has some of the strictest data‑protection laws in the country. He
discussed the importance of doing the hard work of speaking with residents in order to
understand complex issues. He stated that, based on the conversations he has had with
people, it is important that these conversations be had as a community.
Chairman Vetro recessed at 10:48 p.m.
Chairman Vetro reconvened at 10:50 pm.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated his reasons for opposing the resolution. He suggested that
activists also be included as part of the committee. He urged a no vote on the
resolution. Ald. W. Smith, III, stated that he is not in favor of the underlying resolution,
even as amended. He stated that his proposal was a full termination of the cameras,

10

and that is the action he would support. Ald. Lombardi stated that she supports a ban,
but noted that if nothing is done tonight, the cameras will remain in place. She reiterated
that the safeguards added are important.
Chairman Vetro called a 5-minute recess at 10:55 p.m.
Chairman Vetro reconvened at 10:58 p.m.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr, reviewed the reasons he is against the underlying motion. He
discussed the potential makeup of the committee. Ald. W. Smith, III, stated he is not in
favor of underlying motion, even though the amendment proposed by him did pass. He
supports a full ban. Ald. Lombardi stated she is in full support of a ban, but if the
resolution does not pass, as amended, the cameras will still be in place without a
moratorium. Ald. Ali stated he will also be voting against the resolution for the reasons
previously stated.
Main motion, as amended, carried 10 in favor (Bannon, Bevan, Brennan, Federico,
Healy, Hite, Lombardi, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro), 4 against (Ali, Casey, W. Smith, Jr., W.
Smith, III).
(b)
Ald. Pacelli and Ald. Ali made and seconded a motion to approve a
Resolution Re: The Use, Deployment, Retention, Oversight and Codification of the
City's Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Program.
RESOLUTION RE: THE USE, DEPLOYMENT, RETENTION,
OVERSIGHT AND CODIFICATION OF THE CITY'S AUTOMATED
LICENSE PLATE READER (ALPR) PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Milford Police Department ("MPD") currently operates a
network of fixed automated license plate readers (ALPR) for law
enforcement purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Milford ("City") recognizes that technology can
provide valuable tools to promote public safety, assist law enforcement
investigations, identify stolen vehicles, locate missing or endangered
persons, and address other public-safety concerns; and
WHEREAS, the City also recognizes that ALPR technology collects
information concerning motor vehicles at particular locations and times
and that the collection, retention, access to and use of such information
implicates legitimate privacy, civil-liberty, transparency, accountability and
public-trust concerns; and
WHEREAS, the use of ALPR technology requires a balance between
public-safety objectives and reasonable limitations designed to minimize
unnecessary collection, retention, access to and use of ALPR information;
and

11

WHEREAS, the MPD's ALPR policy and practices contain safeguards,
which include, but are not limited to, two-factor authentication, unique
credentials and assigned user roles, limited access to search functions,
supervisory approval, user training, human verification of ALPR hits before
police action, an ALPR Administrator, weekly audits and a transparency
portal; and
WHEREAS, the MPD's ALPR policy also directs the avoidance of
sensitive locations, including places of worship, hospitals, methadone
clinics and political party offices; and
WHEREAS, the MPD has identified and incorporated policy changes
including a seven-day data-retention period, notification concerning a
confirmed data breach, a triennial review of ALPR effectiveness,
consideration of new developments affecting ALPR technology and law,
as well as removal of ALPRs when appropriate; and
WHEREAS, limiting the City's fixed ALPR network to appropriate points of
entry will permit the MPD to retain the investigative and public-safety
benefits of ALPR technology while reducing the potential for routine
collection of information concerning vehicle movements within residential
neighborhoods and other areas of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Aldermen of
the City of Milford hereby resolves the following:
•

Reduction of Fixed ALPRs

The Milford Police Department shall reduce its fixed ALPR network so that
fixed ALPRs are deployed solely at points of entry into the City of Milford.
•

Seven-Day Data Retention

The MPD shall maintain a maximum ALPR data-retention period of seven
(7) days. ALPR data shall be automatically deleted following the sevenday period unless the information has been lawfully preserved in
connection with a specific criminal investigation, prosecution, warrant,
lawful preservation request or other circumstance expressly authorized by
applicable law and the City's ALPR ordinance.
• Access Restrictions
Access to the City's ALPR system shall be limited to authorized personnel
with unique user credentials, requiring two-factor authentication. All
searches shall be logged and subject to audit.

12

•

ALPR Administrator

The MPD shall designate an ALPR Administrator responsible for
administration and oversight of the City's ALPR program, including user
authorization, training, access controls, audit review, retention and
deletion compliance, vendor coordination, complaint review and
preparation of required reports. The ALPR Administrator shall conduct or
cause to be conducted weekly audits of ALPR system access and
searches to identify unauthorized, excessive or otherwise inappropriate
use.
•

Data Breach Notification

The MPD shall establish procedures requiring prompt notification to
appropriate City officials and affected persons, when required by law,
upon confirmation of unauthorized access to or a breach of ALPR
information.
•

Triennial Review

At least once every three (3) years, the MPD shall conduct a
comprehensive review of the effectiveness, necessity, deployment,
privacy implications, retention period, security and continued operation of
the City's ALPR program. The review shall consider investigative value,
searches, investigative leads, arrests or recoveries assisted by ALPR
information, complaints, audit findings, security incidents, changes in
technology or law, community concerns and whether individual ALPR
locations remain justified. The results shall be provided to the Public
Safety Technology Review Committee, Police Commission and Board of
Aldermen.
•

Codification by Ordinance

The Board of Aldermen hereby directs the Ordinance Committee, in
consultation with the City Attorney, Mayor, Police Department and Board
of Police Commissioners, to prepare and present proposed legislation to
codify the substantive provisions of the Milford Police Department's
General Order Chapter 1.80, as well as the points outlined above, into the
Milford Code of Ordinances.
Ald. Lombardi and Ald. Casey made and seconded a motion to amend the resolution as
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Aldermen of the
City of Milford hereby resolves the following:

13

•

Reduction of Moratorium on Fixed ALPRs

The Milford Police Department shall reduce its fixed ALPR network so that
fixed ALPRs are deployed solely at points of entry into the City of Milford
temporarily suspend the operation and use of all fixed or stationary ALPRs
within the city of Milford pending further review of the city's ALPR system.
The moratorium shall not apply to mobile ALPRs installed on or operated
from Milford Police Department vehicles. This moratorium shall not require
the deactivation of cameras used at or for the protection of Milford public
schools provided that such cameras are not being used as fixed ALPRs to
continuously collect or retain license plate data from the general public. No
fixed or stationary ALPR shall be reactivated and no additional fixed or
stationary ALPR shall be installed or activated without further action of the
Board of Alderman.
•

Seven-Day Data Retention

The MPD shall maintain a maximum ALPR data-retention period of seven
(7) days. ALPR data shall be automatically deleted following the sevenday period unless the information has been lawfully preserved in
connection with a specific criminal investigation, prosecution, warrant,
lawful preservation request or other circumstance expressly authorized by
applicable law and the City's ALPR ordinance.
•

Access Restrictions

Access to the City's ALPR system shall be limited to authorized personnel
with unique user credentials, requiring two-factor authentication. All
searches shall be logged and subject to audit.
•

ALPR Administrator

The MPD shall designate an ALPR Administrator responsible for
administration and oversight of the City's ALPR program, including user
authorization, training, access controls, audit review, retention and
deletion compliance, vendor coordination, complaint review and
preparation of required reports. The ALPR Administrator shall conduct or
cause to be conducted weekly audits of ALPR system access and
searches to identify unauthorized, excessive or otherwise inappropriate
use.
•

Data Breach Notification

The MPD shall establish procedures requiring prompt notification to
appropriate City officials and affected persons, when required by law,
upon confirmation of unauthorized access to or a breach of ALPR
information.

14

•

Triennial Review

At least once every three (3) years, the MPD shall conduct a
comprehensive review of the effectiveness, necessity, deployment,
privacy implications, retention period, security and continued operation of
the City's ALPR program. The review shall consider investigative value,
searches, investigative leads, arrests or recoveries assisted by ALPR
information, complaints, audit findings, security incidents, changes in
technology or law, community concerns and whether individual ALPR
locations remain justified. The results shall be provided to the Public
Safety Technology Review Committee, Police Commission and Board of
Aldermen.
•

Codification by Ordinance

The Board of Aldermen hereby directs the Ordinance Committee, in
consultation with the City Attorney, Mayor, Police Department and Board
of Police Commissioners, to prepare and present proposed legislation to
codify the substantive provisions of the Milford Police Department's
General Order Chapter 1.80, as well as the points outlined above, into the
Milford Code of Ordinances.

Ald. Lombardi noted that the amendment does not ban fixed ALPRs, it does shut them
off for now while the technology is being reviewed to determine what further action may
be appropriated.
Ald. Ali and Ald. W. Smith, Jr. made and seconded a motion to amend the foregoing
amendment offered by Ald. Lombardi as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Aldermen of the
City of Milford hereby resolves the following:
•

Reduction of Fixed ALPRs

The Milford Police Department shall reduce its fixed ALPR network so that fixed
ALPRs are deployed solely at points of entry into the City of Milford.
•

Seven-Day Data Retention

The MPD shall maintain a maximum ALPR data-retention period of seven
(7) days. ALPR data shall be automatically deleted following the sevenday period unless the information has been lawfully preserved in
connection with a specific criminal investigation, prosecution, warrant,
lawful preservation request or other circumstance expressly authorized by

15

applicable law and the City's ALPR ordinance. The Board of Aldermen
shall have the authority to request and/or inspect the deletion records only
ensuring that the maximum ALPR data retention period of 7 days is
ensured.
• Access Restrictions
Access to the City's ALPR system shall be limited to authorized personnel
with unique user credentials, requiring two-factor authentication. All
searches shall be logged and subject to audit.
• ALPR Administrator
The MPD shall designate an ALPR Administrator responsible for
administration and oversight of the City's ALPR program, including user
authorization, training, access controls, audit review, retention and
deletion compliance, vendor coordination, complaint review and
preparation of required reports. The ALPR Administrator shall conduct or
cause to be conducted weekly audits of ALPR system access and
searches to identify unauthorized, excessive or otherwise inappropriate
use.
• Data Breach Notification
The MPD shall establish procedures requiring prompt notification to
appropriate City officials and affected persons, when required by law,
upon confirmation of unauthorized access to or a breach of ALPR
information.
• Triennial Review
At least once every three (3) years, the MPD shall conduct a
comprehensive review of the effectiveness, necessity, deployment,
privacy implications, retention period, security and continued operation of
the City's ALPR program. The review shall consider investigative value,
searches, investigative leads, arrests or recoveries assisted by ALPR
information, complaints, audit findings, security incidents, changes in
technology or law, community concerns and whether individual ALPR
locations remain justified. The results shall be provided to the Public
Safety Technology Review Committee, Police Commission and Board of
Aldermen.
•

Codification by Ordinance

The Board of Aldermen hereby directs the Ordinance Committee, in
consultation with the City Attorney, Mayor, Police Department and Board
of Police Commissioners, to prepare and present proposed legislation to
codify the substantive provisions of the Milford Police Department's

16

General Order Chapter 1.80, as well as the points outlined above, into the
Milford Code of Ordinances.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated that he supports eliminating the codification of the general order.
He stated he believes that LPRs have never been voted on by the Board of Aldermen
and have been operating in Milford for eight years. He stated that he does not know how
they were installed and that LPRs have never been authorized by the Board. Ald. Pacelli
asked the City Attorney whether codification by ordinance would result in the committee
presenting recommendations to the Board, noting that the committee would not have
authority to pass anything but only to recommend matters for Board consideration. He
stated that the Ordinance Committee cannot adopt legislation and may only present items
to the full Board for approval. Attorney Berchem responded that the approach is a matter
of policy judgment and is not inappropriate. Ald. Lombardi asked the City Attorney for an
explanation of codification by ordinance. Attorney Berchem stated that General Order
1.80 is the policy used by the Police Department for the utilization of LPRs. He explained
that the intent of codification is to place those standards into law so that they cannot be
changed by the Police Department as a matter of internal policy. Ald. Lombardi asked the
City Attorney whether there would be only one opportunity to codify or whether it could
be revisited. Attorney Berchem stated that once codified, it becomes law and is subject
to amendment if approved by the Board of Aldermen. He stated that the committee would
develop legislation to be proposed to the Board for adoption as an ordinance. Ald. Pacelli
recommended adding the Public Safety Committee to the review committee. Ald. W.
Smith, III, stated that even if the language is removed, the general orders could still be
codified. Attorney Berchem stated that nothing would prevent the Ordinance Committee
from adding such provisions. Ald. Federico stated that she believes the language is
important because it reflects the intent to codify the Police Department’s strict standards
regarding data protection. Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated that the resolution directs the
Ordinance Committee to codify the general orders, and that even if the paragraph were
removed, the Ordinance Committee could still undertake codification. Ald. Brennan
stated that the chapter pertains to ALPRs and expressed surprise that others had not
read it. Ald. Healy stated that he agrees with Ald. Federico regarding codification. He
discussed how ALPRs were implemented within the City, stating that this type of camera
provides protection to officers and residents. He noted that the Police Commission
approved their use and, under the City Charter, has that authority. He further stated that
traffic cameras must be approved by the legislative body under state statute, but ALPRs
do not have such statutory language.
Amendment offered by Ald. Ali and Ald. W. Smith, Jr., failed 10 against (Bannon, Bevan,
Brennan, Federico, Healy, Hite, Lombardi, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro), 4 in favor (Ali, Casey,
W. Smith, Jr., W. Smith, III).
Ald. Lombardi summarized her proposed amended to the resolution. Ald. W. Smith, Jr.,
asked how the review would be conducted. Ald. Lombardi stated that it would be a further
action of the Board of Aldermen. Ald. Healy stated that, under the Charter, the purview
over LPRs lies with the Police Commission, not the Board. Ald. W. Smith, III, stated that
the amendment helps address LPRs in Milford, but that it establishes only a temporary

17

suspension and not a termination. He stated that he will support the amendment because
it moves the matter a step further, but he will not support the underlying motion.
Original amendment offered by Ald. Lombardi and Ald. Casey failed, 9 against (Bannon,
Bevan, Brennan, Federico, Healy, Hite, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro), 5 in favor (Ali, Casey,
Lombardi, W. Smith, Jr., W. Smith, III).
Ald. Ali stated he will be voting no on the underlying motion as he does not believe it goes
far enough.
Ald. Brennan and Ald. Lombardi made and seconded a motion to amend the resolution
as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Aldermen of the
City of Milford hereby resolves the following:
•

Reduction of Fixed ALPRs

The Milford Police Department shall reduce its fixed ALPR network so that fixed
ALPRs are deployed solely at points of entry into the City of Milford.
•

Seven-Day Data Retention

The MPD shall maintain a maximum ALPR data-retention period of seven
(7) days. ALPR data shall be automatically deleted following the sevenday period unless the information has been lawfully preserved in
connection with a specific criminal investigation, prosecution, warrant,
lawful preservation request or other circumstance expressly authorized by
applicable law and the City's ALPR ordinance.
• Access Restrictions
Access to the City's ALPR system shall be limited to authorized personnel
with unique user credentials, requiring two-factor authentication. All
searches shall be logged and subject to audit.
• ALPR Administrator
The MPD shall designate an ALPR Administrator responsible for
administration and oversight of the City's ALPR program, including user
authorization, training, access controls, audit review, retention and
deletion compliance, vendor coordination, complaint review and
preparation of required reports. The ALPR Administrator shall conduct or
cause to be conducted weekly audits of ALPR system access and
searches to identify unauthorized, excessive or otherwise inappropriate
use.

18

• Data Breach Notification
The MPD shall establish procedures requiring prompt notification to
appropriate City officials and affected persons, when required by law,
upon confirmation of unauthorized access to or a breach of ALPR
information.
• Triennial Review
At least once every three (3) years, the MPD shall conduct a
comprehensive review of the effectiveness, necessity, deployment,
privacy implications, retention period, security and continued operation of
the City's ALPR program. The review shall consider investigative value,
searches, investigative leads, arrests or recoveries assisted by ALPR
information, complaints, audit findings, security incidents, changes in
technology or law, community concerns and whether individual ALPR
locations remain justified. The results shall be provided to the Public
Safety Technology Review Committee, Police Commission and Board of
Aldermen.
•

Codification by Ordinance

The Board of Aldermen hereby directs the Ordinance Committee, in
consultation with the City Attorney, Mayor, Police Department, and Board
of Police Commissioners and the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee, to prepare and present proposed legislation to codify the
substantive provisions of the Milford Police Department's General Order
Chapter 1.80, as well as the points outlined above, into the Milford Code
of Ordinances.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee shall conduct a semi-annual review of the program and report
its findings, including the status of the items listed in Exhibit B, to the
Board of Aldermen not less than twice per calendar year.
Exhibit B — Items for Public Safety Technology Review Committee
A. 60-90 Day Review
•

Full inventory of current third-party vendors and
contracts: Flock Safety, Axon, Omni Data, Vancord and
any other vendors, including for each: cameras/services
provided, contract term, cost, and
cancellation/termination provisions

•

Specific evaluation of whether to continue, renegotiate, or
discontinue use of Flock Safety and/or Axon technologies
19

and transition to a different vendor
•

Whether and to what extent manual, non-hotlist ALPR
queries should be paused, limited, or made subject to
additional standards pending the ordinance

B. Regional Coordination
•

Support the Mayor's office in discussions with Stratford,
West Haven, Bridgeport, New Haven, and Orange toward
a common regional ALPR/camera standard or removal

•

Identify whether Milford's program scope can be reduced
as neighboring municipalities adopt comparable
restrictions

•

Report status as part of the semi-annual review

C. Alternative Technology (90-Day Review)
•
•

Investigate ALPR technology that captures/retains data
only for those on a hotlist or active-investigation match,
rather than all plates
Investigate technology or infrastructure for all cameras
not dependent on a third-party commercial vendor

•

Formally inquire of the State of Connecticut whether a
state-operated or state-coordinated program exists or is
under consideration

•

Issue an RFP if warranted by the above

D. Ongoing / Semi-Annual Review
•

Review program operation, retention compliance,
effectiveness and audit results

•

Review of emerging technologies, vendors, and
developments relevant to the program

•

Report findings, and status of items above, to the Board
of Aldermen not less than twice per calendar year

•

Receive and route resident complaints submitted through
the FAQ/direct-reporting channel

20

•

Additional items as the Police Commission, Chief of
Police, Committee, or Board of Aldermen deem relevant

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee membership is to be confirmed at the September 14, 2026
meeting and shall be composed of, at minimum:
(a) a member of the police team appointed by the Chief of Police;
(b) three members of the community;
(c) two members of the Board of Aldermen.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated that the proposal was left on the table this evening. He stated
that he does not know what it accomplishes and does not believe a technology committee
is a good idea. He feels the members need an opportunity to review and analyze the
proposal.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., and W. Smith, III made an seconded a motion to table the amendment.
Ald. Healy requested a 10-minute recess
Ald. Vetro recessed at 11:30 p.m.
Ald. Vetro reconvened at 11:47 p.m.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., withdrew his motion to table the amendment.
Ald. Brennan withdrew her amendment.
Ald. Brennan and Ald. Lombardi made and seconded a motion to amend the resolution
as follows:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee shall conduct a semi-annual review of the program and report
its findings, including the status of the items listed in Exhibit B, to the
Board of Aldermen not less than twice per calendar year.
Exhibit B — Items for Public Safety Technology Review Committee
A. 60-90 Day Review
•

Full inventory of current third-party vendors and
contracts: Flock Safety, Axon, Omni Data, Vancord and
any other vendors, including for each: cameras/services
provided, contract term, cost, and
cancellation/termination provisions

•

Specific evaluation of whether to continue, renegotiate, or
discontinue use of Flock Safety and/or Axon technologies

21

and transition to a different vendor
•

Whether and to what extent manual, non-hotlist ALPR
queries should be paused, limited, or made subject to
additional standards pending the ordinance

B. Regional Coordination
•

Support the Mayor's office in discussions with Stratford,
West Haven, Bridgeport, New Haven, and Orange toward
a common regional ALPR/camera standard or removal

•

Identify whether Milford's program scope can be reduced
as neighboring municipalities adopt comparable
restrictions

•

Report status as part of the semi-annual review

C. Alternative Technology (90-Day Review)
•
•

Investigate ALPR technology that captures/retains data
only for those on a hotlist or active-investigation match,
rather than all plates
Investigate technology or infrastructure for all cameras
not dependent on a third-party commercial vendor

•

Formally inquire of the State of Connecticut whether a
state-operated or state-coordinated program exists or is
under consideration

•

Issue an RFP if warranted by the above

D. Ongoing / Semi-Annual Review
•

Review program operation, retention compliance,
effectiveness and audit results

•

Review of emerging technologies, vendors, and
developments relevant to the program

•

Report findings, and status of items above, to the Board
of Aldermen not less than twice per calendar year

•

Receive and route resident complaints submitted through
the FAQ/direct-reporting channel

22

•

Additional items as the Police Commission, Chief of
Police, Committee, or Board of Aldermen deem relevant

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee membership is to be confirmed at the September 14, 2026
meeting and shall be composed of, at minimum:
(a) a member of the police team appointed by the Chief of Police;
(b) three members of the community;
(c) two members of the Board of Aldermen.
Ald. Lombardi commended Ald. Brennan for her work. She stated that although the
amendment is not a full ban, it has value and represents a step in the right direction.
Ald. W. Smith, III, stated that he does not support the amendment. He discussed his
efforts to terminate the cameras and stated that the underlying resolution still contains the
codification‑by‑ordinance provision and a variety of other issues he cannot support. Ald.
Brennan stated that she does not like cameras and has spent considerable time reviewing
the ordinances, the Charter, and the Police Department’s general orders. She stated that
she identified a way to move toward technology that is more acceptable to the community.
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated that the cameras need to be removed. Ald. Lombardi stated
that voting against the amendment would be voting not to include citizens on the
committee.
Ald. Lombardi made a motion to move the question.
Ald. Healy stated that the Board has worked diligently, researching the issues in order to
understand them and to listen to the Police Department.
Amendment passed, 10 in favor (Bannon, Bevan, Brennan, Federico, Healy, Hite,
Lombardi, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro), 4 against (Ali, Casey, W. Smith, Jr., W. Smith, III).
Ald. W. Smith, Jr., stated that the underlying resolution, even as amended, discusses
LPRs solely at the entry points to Milford. He stated that he does not understand what the
resolution stands for and that he will be voting no. Ald. W. Smith, III, stated that points of
entry are not limited to I‑95 and Route 15. He stated that he will not support the motion.
Ald. Pacelli stated that he will be voting in favor of the resolution as amended. He noted
that he represents all constituents and that the process established will allow for
intelligent, informed decision‑making. Ald. Federico discussed the time spent speaking
with constituents and researching the subject. She stated that she supports the resolution,
noting that it reduces the number of LPRs and begins to address the concerns raised.
She also discussed the use of cameras in solving crimes and acting as a deterrent to
criminals.
Main motion, as amended, passed, 10 in favor (Bannon, Bevan, Brennan, Federico,
Healy, Hite, Lombardi, Pacelli, M. Smith, Vetro), 4 against (Ali, Casey, W. Smith, Jr., W.
Smith, III).

23

Being no further business to discuss, Aid. Pacelli and Aid. Healy made and seconded a
motion to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.

The Board adjourned at 12:10 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
.<

\
Jo WeeKs

Recording Secretary

24

AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN ON
AUGUST 27TH, 2026, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS AMEMDED
AND APPROVED:
RESOLUTION RE: A MORATORIUM ON THE USE OF AUTOMATED TRAFFIC
ENFORCEMENT SAFETY DEVICES (ATESD), A PAUSE ON THE INSTALLATION
OF ADDITIONAL ATESD, AND REVIEW OF THE CITY'S ATESD PROGRAM
WHEREAS, C.G.S. § 14-307c authorizes a municipality to use automated traffic
enforcement safety devices ("ATESDs") at locations within school zones, pedestrian
safety zones and other locations within the municipality, provided that the municipality
adopts an ordinance in accordance with the statute and the locations of such devices
are identified in a plan approved by the Connecticut Department of Transportation
pursuant to C.G.S. § 14-307e; and
WHEREAS, C.G.S. § 14-307c also requires that an ordinance adopted pursuant to that
section provide for the citation hearing procedures established by C.G.S. § 7-152c and
specifies the procedures governing the issuance and mailing of ATESD citations; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2024, the Board of Aldermen voted to adopt Ordinance
Section 14-60, et. seq. “Use of automated traffic safety enforcement devices” and on
March 3, 2025, approved the City of Milford ATESD Plan (the “Plan”), which was
thereafter submitted to and approved by the Connecticut Department of Transportation;
and
WHEREAS, Section 14-60 of the Milford Code of Ordinances currently authorizes the
use of ATESDs at locations within school zones, pedestrian safety zones and other
locations within the City identified in the Plan, subject to the public hearing and approval
requirements established therein; and
WHEREAS, Sections 14-60 through 14-71 of the Milford Code of Ordinances presently
establish a regulatory framework governing the City's ATESD program, including the
use and operation of ATESDs, the issuance and mailing of citations, fines, citation
hearings, appeals, defenses and the disclosure, retention and destruction of information
and data; and
WHEREAS, residents of the City have expressed concerns and raised questions
regarding the City's use and administration of ATESDs, including the appropriate
locations and hours for speed-camera enforcement, the amount of fines imposed, the
escalation of fines for subsequent violations, the procedures available to persons

1992502.1

wishing to contest citations, and the receipt of citations by persons who lease motor
vehicles; and
WHEREAS, ATESD technology serves a fundamental public-safety purpose, particularly
in areas where speeding creates a heightened risk to students, pedestrians and other
vulnerable road users, but also recognizes the importance of ensuring that the City's
use of such technology is appropriately limited, transparent, proportionate and
consistent with the expectations of the Milford community; and
WHEREAS, a moratorium on the operation of existing ATESDs and the installation of
additional ATESDs will provide an appropriate period during which the Board, City
officials and members of the community may review the City's ATESD program, the
Plan, the City's ATESD ordinance and the concerns raised regarding the use and
administration of ATESDs; and
WHEREAS, if the City continues to utilize ATESDs following such review, their use
should be more narrowly focused on speed enforcement in school zones during
specified hours and should include fines and procedures that are proportionate to the
nature of the violations and provide appropriate opportunities for persons to contest
citations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Aldermen of the City of
Milford hereby imposes a moratorium, commencing on the date following approval of
this Resolution, on the operation and use of all currently installed ATESDs and on the
installation of any additional ATESDs within the City of Milford; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that during the moratorium, a Public Safety Technology
Review Committee established by the Mayor, which Committee shall include the
majority and minority leader, shall review the City's Comprehensive Traffic Safety Plan
and Sections 14-60 through 14-71 of the Milford Code of Ordinances and shall make
recommendations to the Ordinance Committee of the Board of Aldermen concerning the
use, operation and administration of ATESDs within the City including potential
complete termination of ATESDs within the City; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the recommendations of the Public Safety
Technology Review Committee, the Ordinance Committee shall consider amendments
to Sections 14-60 through 14-71, as appropriate, to ensure that the ATESD program
provides clear and transparent requirements concerning the locations and hours of
operation of speed cameras, the issuance and mailing of citations, identification of the
person legally responsible for a leased motor vehicle, citation hearings and appeals,

1992502.1

review of recorded images, privacy and data-retention requirements, and other
safeguards necessary to ensure compliance with C.G.S. §§ 14-307c through 14-307h
and other applicable law or the process of complete termination of ATESDs within the
City if the Review Committee and the Board of Aldermen representatives deem
appropriate; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review Committee be
confirmed by the Board of Aldermen at their September 14, 2026 meeting.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to
amend, repeal, suspend or otherwise modify Sections 14-60 through 14-71 of the
Milford Code of Ordinances, the City's Comprehensive Traffic Safety Plan, or any
approval issued by the Connecticut Department of Transportation, and that any
substantive changes to the City's ATESD program shall be accomplished through such
ordinance, Plan and approval processes as may be required by applicable law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon completion of its review, the Ordinance
Committee shall report its recommendations to the Board of Aldermen, including any
proposed amendments to Sections 14-60 through 14-71 and, if appropriate, any
proposed amendments to the City's Comprehensive Traffic Safety Plan requiring
approval pursuant to C.G.S. § 14-307e and Section 14-60 of the Milford Code of
Ordinances.

DATED AT MILFORD, CT THIS 4th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
ATTEST: PETER C. SMITH, CITY CLERK

1992502.1

AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN ON
AUGUST 27TH, 2026, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS AMEMDED
AND APPROVED:
RESOLUTION RE: THE USE, DEPLOYMENT, RETENTION, OVERSIGHT
AND CODIFICATION OF THE CITY'S AUTOMATED LICENSE
PLATE READER (ALPR) PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Milford Police Department ("MPD") currently operates a network of
fixed automated license plate readers (ALPR) for law enforcement purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Milford ("City") recognizes that technology can provide valuable
tools to promote public safety, assist law enforcement investigations, identify stolen
vehicles, locate missing or endangered persons, and address other public-safety
concerns; and
WHEREAS, the City also recognizes that ALPR technology collects information
concerning motor vehicles at particular locations and times and that the collection,
retention, access to and use of such information implicates legitimate privacy, civilliberty, transparency, accountability and public-trust concerns; and
WHEREAS, the use of ALPR technology requires a balance between public-safety
objectives and reasonable limitations designed to minimize unnecessary collection,
retention, access to and use of ALPR information; and
WHEREAS, the MPD's ALPR policy and practices contain safeguards, which include,
but are not limited to, two-factor authentication, unique credentials and assigned user
roles, limited access to search functions, supervisory approval, user training, human
verification of ALPR hits before police action, an ALPR Administrator, weekly audits and
a transparency portal; and
WHEREAS, the MPD's ALPR policy also directs the avoidance of sensitive locations,
including places of worship, hospitals, methadone clinics and political party offices; and
WHEREAS, the MPD has identified and incorporated policy changes including a sevenday data-retention period, notification concerning a confirmed data breach, a triennial
review of ALPR effectiveness, consideration of new developments affecting ALPR
technology and law, as well as removal of ALPRs when appropriate; and
WHEREAS, limiting the City's fixed ALPR network to appropriate points of entry will
permit the MPD to retain the investigative and public-safety benefits of ALPR technology
while reducing the potential for routine collection of information concerning vehicle
movements within residential neighborhoods and other areas of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Aldermen of the City of
Milford hereby resolves the following:

•

Reduction of Fixed ALPRs

The Milford Police Department shall reduce its fixed ALPR network so that fixed ALPRs
are deployed solely at points of entry into the City of Milford.
•

Seven-Day Data Retention

The MPD shall maintain a maximum ALPR data-retention period of seven (7) days.
ALPR data shall be automatically deleted following the seven-day period unless the
information has been lawfully preserved in connection with a specific criminal
investigation, prosecution, warrant, lawful preservation request or other circumstance
expressly authorized by applicable law and the City's ALPR ordinance.
•

Access Restrictions

Access to the City's ALPR system shall be limited to authorized personnel with unique
user credentials, requiring two-factor authentication. All searches shall be logged and
subject to audit.
•

ALPR Administrator

The MPD shall designate an ALPR Administrator responsible for administration and
oversight of the City's ALPR program, including user authorization, training, access
controls, audit review, retention and deletion compliance, vendor coordination,
complaint review and preparation of required reports. The ALPR Administrator shall
conduct or cause to be conducted weekly audits of ALPR system access and searches
to identify unauthorized, excessive or otherwise inappropriate use.
•

Data Breach Notification

The MPD shall establish procedures requiring prompt notification to appropriate City
officials and affected persons, when required by law, upon confirmation of unauthorized
access to or a breach of ALPR information.
•

Triennial Review

At least once every three (3) years, the MPD shall conduct a comprehensive review of
the effectiveness, necessity, deployment, privacy implications, retention period, security
and continued operation of the City's ALPR program. The review shall consider
investigative value, searches, investigative leads, arrests or recoveries assisted by
ALPR information, complaints, audit findings, security incidents, changes in technology

or law, community concerns and whether individual ALPR locations remain justified. The
results shall be provided to the Public Safety Technology Review Committee, Police
Commission and Board of Aldermen.

•

Codification by Ordinance

The Board of Aldermen hereby directs the Ordinance Committee, in consultation with
the City Attorney, Mayor, Police Department and Board of Police Commissioners, to
prepare and present proposed legislation to codify the substantive provisions of the
Milford Police Department's General Order Chapter 1.80, as well as the points outlined
above, into the Milford Code of Ordinances.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee shall conduct a semi-annual review of the program and report its
findings, including the status of the items listed in Exhibit B, to the Board of
Aldermen not less than twice per calendar year.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Public Safety Technology Review
Committee membership is to be confirmed at the September 14, 2026, meeting
and shall be composed of, at minimum:
(a) a member of the police team appointed by the Chief of Police;
(b) three members of the community;
(c) two members of the Board of Aldermen.

Exhibit B — Items for Public Safety Technology Review Committee
A. 60-90 Day Review
•

Full inventory of current third-party vendors and contracts: Flock
Safety, Axon, Omni Data, Vancord and any other vendors, including for
each: cameras/services provided, contract term, cost, and
cancellation/termination provisions

•

Specific evaluation of whether to continue, renegotiate, or
discontinue use of Flock Safety and/or Axon technologies and
transition to a different vendor

•

Whether and to what extent manual, non-hotlist ALPR queries should
be paused, limited, or made subject to additional standards pending
the ordinance

B. Regional Coordination
•

Support the Mayor's office in discussions with Stratford, West Haven,
Bridgeport, New Haven, and Orange toward a common regional
ALPR/camera standard or removal

•

Identify whether Milford's program scope can be reduced as
neighboring municipalities adopt comparable restrictions

•

Report status as part of the semi-annual review

C. Alternative Technology (90-Day Review)
•
•

Investigate ALPR technology that captures/retains data only for those
on a hotlist or active-investigation match, rather than all plates
Investigate technology or infrastructure for all cameras not dependent
on a third-party commercial vendor

•

Formally inquire of the State of Connecticut whether a state-operated
or state-coordinated program exists or is under consideration

•

Issue an RFP if warranted by the above

D. Ongoing / Semi-Annual Review
•

Review program operation, retention compliance, effectiveness and
audit results

•

Review of emerging technologies, vendors, and developments
relevant to the program

•

Report findings, and status of items above, to the Board of Aldermen
not less than twice per calendar year

•

Receive and route resident complaints submitted through the
FAQ/direct-reporting channel

•

Additional items as the Police Commission, Chief of Police,
Committee, or Board of Aldermen deem relevant

DATED AT MILFORD, CT THIS 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
ATTEST: PETER C. SMITH, CITY CLERK

7.

Unfinished Business (tabled from the Regular August 3, 2026,
Board of Aldermen meeting):
a.

Board of Aldermen consideration of a Resolution to Impose a
Temporary Moratorium on the Use of Flock Group, lnc. and
Other Cameras and to Direct a Review of the Current
Program.