★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
The Docket · Government Meeting · DKT-2026-000711

On the agenda: Alpine meeting — FLOCK CAMERA (Feb 10)

Past  ⚠ Agenda Watch  Alpine, Utah · Tuesday, February 10, 2026 — 7 months ago

About this record

The published agenda for this February 10 meeting contains: "FLOCK CAMERA". The meeting has passed; the record and its outcome live here permanently.

WhenTuesday, February 10, 2026
Check the agenda document for the meeting time.
WhereAlpine, Utah
Money$10,340 was at stake
On the record“FLOCK CAMERA”

The agenda, word for word

Government public record — the full text of the published document, archived September 3, 2026. Gold highlighting of key terms is ours, not the original’s. Read the original document ↗

112 pages · scroll to read
Page 1 of 112

ALPINE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
NOTICE is hereby given that the CITY COUNCIL of Alpine City, Utah, will hold a Public Meeting on Tuesday,
February 10, 2026, at 6:00 pm, at 20 North Main Street which can be viewed on the Alpine City YouTube Channel.
A direct link to the channel can be found on the home page of the Alpine City website: alpineut.gov. Public comments
will be accepted during the Public Comment portion of the meeting.
I.

CALL MEETING TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
B. Prayer
C. Pledge

Mayor Carla Merrill
Andrew Young
Chrissy Hannemann

II.

CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approve Minutes from the Budget Retreat on January 23rd and City Council Meeting on January
27th
B. Approval to Remove Pump from Busch Well – Nickerson Company: $10,340

III.

PUBLIC COMMENT

IV.

REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS
A. Financial Report – January 2026
B. Water Outlook for 2026
C. Proposal for Pressurized Irrigation Projects

V.

ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Ordinance 2026-06: Amend Alpine City Code for View Protection
B. Review of Resolution R2025-32: Water Conservation Plan
C. Review of Resolution R22025-33: Water Use and Preservation Elements of the General Plan

VI.

STAFF REPORTS

VII. COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
VIII. CLOSED MEETING: Discuss litigation, property acquisition, or the professional character, conduct, or
competence of personnel
Mayor Carla Merrill
February 6, 2026

THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN ALL CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. If you need a special accommodation to participate,
please call the City Recorder’s Office at (801) 756-6347 x 3.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING. The undersigned duly appointed recorder does hereby certify that the above agenda notice was on the bulletin
board located inside City Hall at 20 North Main Alpine, UT. This agenda is also available on our website at alpineut.gov and on the Utah Public
Meeting Notices website at www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html

Page 2 of 112

1
ALPINE CITY COUNCIL BUDGET RETREAT
January 23, 2026
Mayor Carla Merrill called the meeting to order at 8:15 am.
I.

CALL MEETING TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
Mayor Carla Merrill
The following council members were present: Brent Rummler, Jessica Smuin, Sarah Blackwell, Chrissy
Hannemann, and Andrew Young
Staff: Shane Sorensen, Ryan Robinson, Jason Judd, and DeAnn Parry

II.

Goal Setting / Budget Prioritization
Shane Sorensen said that staff have learned that they need more than two weeks to gather information and
costs for the council-submitted proposals. We will adjust the timeline for next year’s budget retreat.
The council shared goals and ideas:
- Create a five-year plan to address specific needs in the parks and gather plenty of public input.
- Establish a design guide for signs at parks and city buildings to provide consistency. Install monument
signs identifying each of the parks.
- Install rusted metal signs (like in the roundabout) at the city entrances on Westfield Road and Canyon
Crest. Small sections of property may need to be purchased for this.
- Replace the complaint-centered citizen model with a proactive model where the council hears and
addresses resident needs.
- Protect Alpine from high-density urban development. Currently Alpine’s smallest lot is 10,000 sf, but
the legislature has discussed requiring 6,000 sf lots.
- Alpine is far removed from transportation centers like TRAX or FrontRunner stations, so it does not
make sense to force high-density housing here. Each city knows what is best for its own residents.
- Include our senior housing overlay areas in the required Middle Income Housing report. The state’s
main goal is to confirm that we are doing something about the issue. Alpine’s report has been approved
each year.
- Craft a mission statement in addition to the General Plan introduction which talks about “…orderly and
balanced growth.” Determine what Alpine is to be known for, like clean streets, beautiful trails, a rural
setting, etc.

III.

City Finance Discussion
A. PARC Tax Spending Philosophy (Parks, Arts, Recreation & Culture)
Staff and council members shared comments and ideas:
- Most of the revenue comes from online sales.
- It’s good to identify the PARC funded projects with a sign so residents know where their tax dollars
are being spent.
- We cannot use impact fees to replace worn out playground equipment.
- We could easily spend all of the funds on parks but need to add more emphasis on arts and
recreation. We could earmark a small percentage of PARC funds for citizen applications for arts
and recreation. Projects focused on preserving history would also be great, and we could rotate the
topic each year. Some cities have a PARC committee to help direct their discretionary funds.
- An economic development plan is needed so tax revenues grow instead of shrinking, and the Main
Street Master Plan includes a section on this topic. The Finance Committee could also be involved.
B. Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund Policy
There is currently $1.8M in the Perpetual Care fund because we have sold 750 plots in the last 18
months. Seventy-five percent of each sale goes to the Perpetual Care Fund, and 25 percent goes to the
General Fund. Currently cemetery maintenance is paid from the General Fund. It would be good to
transfer money each year from the Perpetual Care fund to the General Fund for cemetery maintenance. A
fund analysis would help us determine the ideal balance to maintain in the fund. Alpine’s ordinance calls

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 3 of 112

2
it a trust fund, but it is like an endowment. The ordinance needs to be updated. Staff will conduct an
analysis to see how to best make this work.
Half of the plots in the North Cemetery expansion have been sold at this point. Council members asked
about the next cemetery expansion options. They also expressed interest in creating a cremation burial
area.
C. Public Works Building
The PW building adjacent to the cemetery is falling apart and cannot be fixed because of the type of
construction. There are seismic issues with it as well. American Fork just completed a new PW facility,
and it cost $40M. We are not as large as American Fork, but construction is very expensive now. Alpine
City owns property on 300 North, but it is not big enough for a PW building. We need to look for other
solutions.
IV.

FY2027 Budget Calendar
Shane Sorensen recommended that council members refer to the Budget Calendar so they will know about
upcoming budget events and deadlines.

V.

City Council Proposed Projects
A. Canyon Crest Road Roundabout
Brent Rummler said that residents are concerned about safety and speeding on Canyon Crest Road. Two
engineers have suggested a roundabout for safety and improved operations at the intersection with Ridge
Drive. Lindon City has a smaller roundabout near the LDS temple, but Andy Spencer, a UDOT engineer
and Alpine resident, recommends a larger one for this intersection. Because of the upcoming trail project
funded by MAG on this road, it will reduce costs to the city because the paving is already covered (and
asphalt prices have dropped 30 percent since last year). The road will be shifted somewhat east toward
Peterson Park, and it would be wise to do both projects at the same time.
Part of the cost of a roundabout is running utilities to it. We will not need water here because a planter is
not needed. Peterson Park will be the focus. Keller Associates has offered to provide a concept plan (with
an approximate one-day turnaround) at no cost. They also want to submit a bid to design the roundabout.
The full design would take several months to complete.
There is a chance that we could ask for additional funds from MAG for the roundabout as part of the
road/trail project. Michael Clark (office manager at Keller & Associates) and Andy Spencer felt like
officials at MAG would take into consideration that this is the first funding Alpine has received, but we
need to get the concept plan to MAG as soon as possible.
Staff and council members shared comments and ideas:
- From the UDOT website we learn that 60 percent of the traffic coming north is using Canyon Crest
Road instead of Alpine Highway.
- If we request more funding, the project would be presented to the MAG Technical Advisory
Committee and the Executive Board for voting.
- Alpine’s current roundabout on Main Street is the correct size for our traffic. It must be large enough
for trucks with long trailers, around 160 feet in diameter.
- An initial cost estimate is around $1.2M. Some funding could come from street impact fees, Class C
Road funds, etc.
- The roundabout may not slow cars as much as we hope, but it should eliminate high speeds and
improve pedestrian safety.
- The proposed roundabout will not address speeding going south towards Highland, so additional
traffic calming measures may be needed there.
- The Ridge Drive intersection is very congested with underground utilities and will make
construction more complicated.
- The biggest utility issue will likely be how to handle storm water direction channels.

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 4 of 112

3

B. Raised Crosswalks / Speed Humps
Brent Rummer said that residents have expressed concern because no progress has been made in dealing
with dangerous crosswalks. Raised crosswalks and speed humps do force vehicles to slow down, but they
also make snow removal and emergency services (EMS) travel difficult.
Raised crosswalks have been suggested for Main Street, but this is the primary road that EMS travels. A
better solution might be to abandon the bike lanes and add curb extensions, which allow bicycles to
travel smoothly. Other possible locations for raised crosswalks are at Creekside Park, W. Canyon Crest
Road, and Grove Drive.
Mapleton City allows raised crosswalks to be installed only within a certain proximity to schools. They
found that those who benefit most are the residents who live nearby. Radar data showed that people
speed up after crossing the hump to make up for the lost time. To be effective the intervals between
humps should be around 500 feet.
Staff and council members shared comments and ideas:
- There were several speed bumps on Parkway by Burgess Park in the early 2000’s, but they were
removed because of neighborhood complaints. People find that trucks and trailers create more noise
when crossing the bumps.
- Cedar Hills removed their speed bumps when they resurfaced the road, though they did keep the
raised crosswalk by the elementary school.
- Because there are sometimes unintended consequences with solutions, it would be good to do a test
run with a temporary fix before installing anything permanent. Radar signs can help us gather data
before and after a speed bump.
- Engineering is required when we change traffic solutions, especially for storm drainage. Fehr &
Peers are excellent consultants and would be good to help us with traffic and crosswalk issues.
- Engineering is important but we also need enforcement and education. Some cities form traffic
committees to address these issues. We could also reach out to the schools to have them educate
parents about traffic safety. Including articles in the Newsline will let residents know we are trying to
address these issues.
- We should consider recommendations from the professionals but that doesn’t outweigh what we
know as citizens of this community.
- While we need traffic calming measures, we also need to consider a mass evacuation and how that
would impact traffic. If we do install curb extensions, it may be good to have rolled curbs so they
will be less impactful in an emergency.
- The road near Timberline Middle School is busy and dangerous. Most neighbors probably would not
want raised crosswalks, but curb extensions and more intense painted patterns for crosswalks could
improve visibility and safety.
- Our speed trailer is regularly moved to different locations around town. It has not shown evidence of
excessive speeding, as drivers see the sign and slow down.
- Highland’s mayor said they installed two temporary speed humps, but residents complained so much
that they put them in their storage shed. We could borrow those for a test period.
3.

Ranch Drive Extension
Chrissy Hannemann said that our long-term master plan shows a connector road from Ranch Drive to the
Alpine Highway. Sgt. Charlie Thurston (LPPD) said that a connector would really help with
Mountainville Academy and other traffic and would improve emergency access for the city.
Building this road would be expensive. We could start saving up to have the funds when the former
Bangerter property (currently owned by the Church), is developed in the future.
Staff and council members shared comments and ideas:
- Building a road is expensive and complicated and utility lines need to be planned before the road is
designed. We also need a road plan that will be acceptable to UDOT.

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 5 of 112

4
-

4.

A roundabout at the intersection with the highway might help traffic flow.
The bridge could cost around $1M.
In Alpine we do not have a large number of homes built each year, so waiting for impact fees to
build up does not work for large projects. There are situations where it is wise to bond so that
important projects can move forward, and we can use impact fees to make bond payments.
This road would benefit residents now and in the future. Waiting 10 or 20 years does not improve
our situation.
It would be good to have our engineer take a concept alignment and meet with Metro Water and
UDOT to see if they would agree to the planned intersection. Then we can approach the Church
(property owner).

Parks Master Plan
Chrissy Hannemann said that we receive a lot of resident requests about parks, as evidenced by Heidi
Smith’s list (and the end of the minutes). She would like residents to know we are listening and that we
have a long-term plan, so they know what to expect.
Staff and council members shared comments and ideas:
- The Parks Master Plan will have recommendations for future improvements but may not be
completed for six months because reviews take time. A five-year timeline for projects would be
helpful.
- If we have these plans in place, residents who wish to volunteer can help with specific things.
- We can earmark money in next year’s budget for parks projects and then move the funds with a
budget amendment. Small projects, like signs, can be handled without amendments.
- Parks are different from city utilities (enterprise funds), as there is not a budget category for projects.
Depending on the specifics, they are paid from impact fees, PARC taxes, and the General Fund.
- Past councils have talked about various ideas but did not get them prioritized. When we have the
Master Plan finished and gather community input, we should get moving and not wait until next
year. Let’s set priorities and go.
- We may have better luck obtaining grants to improve the baseball fields if we can show the regional
impact, listing all the players that come from different cities. A letter of endorsement from the
baseball league could be helpful as well.
- An arboretum grant may be possible for Peterson Park as it has historic trees and a compelling story.
- Many grants are a 50/50 match. We can earmark funds in the next budget year for grants we are
likely to receive.

5.

Water Infrastructure Projects
Chrissy Hannemann said that Steve Burrows often speaks at City Council meetings about Alpine’s water
situation. He likes a big picture approach and is concerned about our water plan. We need residents to
understand the need for infrastructure improvements.
Pressurized irrigation uses 80-85 percent of our total water, and residents need more education on how to
conserve. Watering in two shorter cycles helps the water soak in better, and isolating zones with different
needs is most efficient. Church properties in the area have installed smart watering systems, and it would
help if our schools do the same. We could also host a water conservation open house for residents.
Staff and council members shared comments and ideas:
- An informative mailer, separate from the monthly utility bill, and articles in the Newsline could help
educate residents. Staff recently applied for a grant to help encourage Eye on Water sign-ups,
educate residents, and promote conservation efforts.
- Some cities only allow a one-time leak adjustment. We should evaluate our current policies on this.
- Frequent cleaning of PI filters helps systems work well. Education is needed.
- Higher tier fees for over-use may discourage wasting water. We may need to adjust rates for zones
like Box Elder, Willow Canyon, and Three Falls.
- If Pine Grove is annexed, the developer will have to build the water infrastructure to serve those lots.

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 6 of 112

5
6.

We could consider requiring that a certain percentage of the lot for a new home be in xeriscape.

Water Well, Storage & Other Water Projects
Andrew Young said that our PI Water is a crucial issue and we need additional water storage to capture
spring runoff.
Staff and council members shared comments and ideas:
- The Kay Asay property is owned by the city, but it is not a viable option for a well because of an
existing fault there. Three other city properties have also been eliminated as options.
- During the daytime, our PI wells pump water into the reservoirs so it can be used for the highdemand times at night. The Rodeo Grounds tank holds 3M gallons. If it were doubled in size, it
would help level out the pressure during peak usage but would not add a water source.
- Wells are the way to add a new water source. Pleasant Grove just put in a new well and it took two
years to reach production. Before we construct a well, we drill a test well and run tests. We hope to
achieve 1000 gallons/hour production.
- Previously we were told that we would not need another well for 10 years, but five years later we
already need that water. We should get started now.
- The proposed Heritage Heights well would provide redundancy in the upper zone. We’ve had several
wells, including the large Healey Well, go down repeatedly in previous seasons. We cannot know
how things will play out each year.
- We cannot pump the Healey Well and take CUP water at the same time because our pipes are not
large enough. The Canyon Crest Road improvements will install larger diameter pipes to get water to
the storage tank by the North Stake Center.
- We currently do not have a well in the high zone to help out in low-snowpack or quick-melt years.
- Council members expressed interest in hearing from Jeff Davis directly.
Shane Sorensen explained that we have three pumps on the Asay property that help serve the low zone.
With the new development at The Ridge at Alpine we required a new pump to serve the high zone. It has
helped somewhat. We get water from Dry Creek, Box Elder Canyon, and overflow from the culinary
water at Grove Spring.
The Alpine Irrigation Co owns the water rights at Grove Spring, which serves 100 percent of the culinary
water needs of the city, plus the outdoor watering in the high elevation areas. It is very important to
maintain a good relationship with the Irrigation Company. Alpine currently owns the most shares (around
40 percent) in the company. Will Jones and Roger Bennett have been great to work with. There is a
provision to create a drought committee, which is three individuals from the city and three from the
irrigation company. When we are in a drought, they meet together and work on the plan to manage the
limited water.
Andrew Young had additional suggestions relating to water. He would like the broken spout on the water
fountain at Legacy Park replaced. He also suggested building a small-scale replica of Sliding Rock for
visitors to enjoy at Creekside Park.

7.

Additional Crosswalk on Grove Drive
Sarah Blackwell said that North Grove Drive could use a crosswalk and improved signage. A domed
mirror could also help with safety. We need traffic calming for the protection of school children and
other pedestrians. A similar problem exists at the 90-degree turn on North Grove. Residents cannot see
children walking to catch the bus.
Shane said that a warrant study will likely be required by UDOT. Staff will work on this to find
solutions.

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 7 of 112

6

Due to time constraints, Mayor Carla Merrill suggested that staff present their project list next. The
remaining topics will be addressed in a future work session prior to a City Council meeting.

8.

Update on Staff Projects
A. Lone Peak Public Safety Budget - The budget will increase approximately $140,000 this year and
$280,000 next year.
B. Street maintenance - These projects need to continue on schedule to keep our roads in good shape.
C. Canyon Crest Road improvements - If the right-of-way acquisition goes smoothly, we hope to start
construction this spring.
D. Carlton Shop Improvements – We have had this property under contract, waiting for a 1031
exchange with the seller and anticipate it will close soon. The Public Works department needs extra
shop space, and this is a good interim solution. The building would be easy to sell if we do not need
it in the future.
We need to run water and sewer there for a restroom. Visually, it would be nice for the
neighborhood if we paint the building and face it with hardy board. A dumpster enclosure was also
suggested. The city owns property to the south, so we could use some of that for the enclosure. Staff
will put numbers together. This could be a project for the next budget year.
E. Fire Station Addition/Remodel – This project will cross budget years. The addition will add six
bedrooms to the station.
F.

Burgess Park Outfield Net – The net has only been replaced once and it has worn out again. We do
not need new poles, just the net. The estimated cost is around $5,000.

G. Resurface of Burgess Park Tennis Courts – We want to update the colors to blue and green when this
is done. Staff are working on cost estimates. It would be nice to add a restroom nearby because of
heavy use of the courts.
H. City Hall Landscape Improvements - With the fire station updates we would like to replace the dated
landscaping. The Sculpture Garden project may be able to cover the costs and the labor. Jessica
Smuin would like to be involved with the Sculpture Garden Committee.

9.

I.

Relic Hall Improvements – The hall has a new roof and needs some other repairs, such as new
stucco. We can look at grants because of its historical status. There is not a rush on this but we can
think about it.

J.

The DUP Monument Improvement – This monument is at the entrance to the North Cemetery and
currently sits in a low spot. We did not think it could be lifted without damage, so the DUP gave us
permission to rebuild it. Currently there is only one woman listed on the plaque, and a resident has
asked that female pioneer names be listed also.

Park Improvement as Requested by Residents
List compiled by Heidi Smith – as of 1/19/2026
Creekside:
· Better playground equipment
· Improved water feature

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 8 of 112

7
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·

Tennis nets need replacement (DONE)
Tennis posts need leveling
Pickleball surface repair
Wind screen replacement (some) (DONE)
Pickleball nets need repair/replacement (two of them)- (DONE)
Better, “cooler” playground equipment
Exercise stations around walking trail
Pavilion power is inconsistent
Water bottle fill options for water fountain (IN PROGRESS)

Burgess:
· Benches around trail for walker rest spots (DONE)
· Outfield net (along Canyon Crest) needs repair/replacement. Left field is almost completely gone.
· Outfield fences need to be tacked down in many places
· Outfield fence bumpers (yellow) missing in some spots
· Safety nets over bleachers
· Snack Shack needs paint and floor resurfaced
· Water fountain runs constantly
· Water bottle fill options for water fountain
· Backstop bumpers need replacement or repair
· Hot water heater not functioning (may have been fixed but not sure)
· Rugby goal replacement (DONE!)
· Fence maintenance, secure fencing to the bottom tension wire and secure the tension wire to the
posts (Heidi).
· Install awning material above bleacher seats for safety and shade. (Brad Belnap)
· Replace top fence guard (yellow) on the outfield fencing for Field 1. (Brad Belnap)
· Snack Shack - Restroom gutter repair (Brad Belnap)
· Snack Shack - Restroom stucco repair (Brad Belnap)
· Infield sprinklers installed on Fields 1 and 4, and possibly 5 (Brad Belnap)
· Prune trees (Brad Belnap)
· Install motion sensor LED lighting on each side of the second floor of the snack shack - restroom.
(Brad Belnap)
Rachel McTeer
· Needs a restroom
· Needs a water fountain
Smooth Canyon
· Re-seed and repair to turf (soccer is supposed to be moving the goals)
· A resident would like to eliminate soccer on Smooth Canyon field (via Andrew Young) 9/3/25
Healey
· Soccer fields moved more to the east away from houses (DONE)
· Fences are being hit by balls and begin damaged (via Andrew Young) 9/3/25 - altered field
direction for short term fix; talked to league for games & practice; signage?
· Parking should not occur along Healy Blvd. (via Andrew Young) 9/3/25 – talked to league
Lambert
· Expand south parking lot (in progress)
· Water fountains w/bottle fill & dog dish features (DONE)

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 9 of 112

8
Legacy
· Need benches in gazebo again (DONE)
Becks Hill
· Bathroom
· Basketball hoop repair
· Vole “invasion” into neighboring yard
Peterson Park
· Trail work behind housing – could be a past privacy issue
Silverleaf Park
· Weird holes being dug? – visited site and looks like maybe a “hideout” type of setup (took photos)
10.

Postponed
The following will be addressed in a future work session:
• Becks Hill Park Restroom
• Parking Lot at Peterson Park & Preservation/Gateway Transformation
• Sidewalks Proposal
• Traffic Calming
• Racoon Plan
• Alpine Highway Easement Beautification
• Alpine History Preservation Projects
• Fire Prevention Projects
• Deer Crest Circle Signs

The meeting was adjourned at 1:35 pm.

CC Budget Retreat 1-23-2026

Page 10 of 112

1
ALPINE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 27, 2026
Mayor Carla Merrill called the meeting to order at 6:03 pm.
I.

CALL MEETING TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
Mayor Carla Merrill
The following were in attendance at the anchor location, which constituted a quorum: Jessica Smuin, Sarah
Blackwell, Chrissy Hannemann, and Andrew Young. Brent Rummler was excused.
Staff: Shane Sorensen, Steve Doxey, Chief Brian Gwilliam, Chief Brian Patten, and DeAnn Parry
Others: Susanne Peterson, Adam Sidwell, Carl Hollan, August Bateman, Sullivan Love, Annie Williams,
Phillip Williams, Steve Burrows, Sheryl Cragun Dame, Nicki Brammer, Jack Brammer, Catherine
Johnston, Jeff Davis
B. Prayer
Jessica Smuin
C. Pledge
Sarah Blackwell

II.

LEGISLATIVE REPORT – Senator Brady Brammer
Sen. Brammer explained that Rep. Kristin Chevier could not attend tonight because of another meeting. He
loves coming to Alpine because of our strong sense of community and thanked the City Council for being good
examples of public service. He also commended Police Chief Brian Gwilliam and Fire Chief Brian Patten for
their excellent work.
Sen. Brammer said that there are 248 cities in the state, and when one causes a problem, it often results in a
new law that applies to everyone. He tries to fix problems and craft amendments to flawed bills. He gave his
cell number to the council members and encouraged them to call him. He prefers to let cities handle their
business and not interfere with elections and schools. He is very willing to play defense for Alpine. He is
currently working to amend the 5th/5th tax law to keep the funds in the county and was able to secure a new
judge position for Utah County.
Andrew Young said he has been to the Legislature several times recently, and thanked Sen. Brammer and Rep.
Chevrier for their work. He learned that many legislators do not write their own bills. There is a culture of
voting yes on a bill so that the sponsors will support your own bill. Andrew wants them to do what is best for
the cities and the state. He encouraged Sen. Brammer to fight for local control.
Sen. Brammer said you have to pick your battles. In the House he was known as “Bill Kill Brammer.” In the
Senate, things are different. Sometimes you vote yes because 70 percent of the bills are small adjustments to
existing code to help things work better. Most are not controversial, but some bill you have to stop. He invited
council members and citizens to visit the Legislature because it is much more interesting to be there in person.
Chrissy Hannemann commented that it looks like election laws are moving in a direction that will make it
harder for people to vote. Young voters are politically savvy and know what is going on. Requiring extra steps
and in-person ID validation will discourage them. The rising generation wants to participate, and these barriers
are not helpful.
Sen. Brammer said that most people like receiving their ballots by mail, so they have time to research the
candidates. That privilege is not threatened at this point. We want elections to be fair and open, but must
minimize fraud, though we have not had fraud in Utah that would change election outcomes. It is important
that ballots are returned in time to be counted, and last-minute mailing does not work anymore.
Sarah Blackwell had questions about new bills and their alignment with the state constitution, as well as HB 48
and the need for direction in enforcement.
Sen. Brammer said that if there is a question about constitutionality, the courts make that determination. Alpine
is sensitive to Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) bills because of our location. They will continue to work on
this legislation. Lawmakers rarely get the bills right on the first try.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 11 of 112

2
Mayor Carla Merrill said that often the best intentions have unintended consequences. She thanked Sen.
Brammer for being proactive to gather the mayors and keep them informed.
Chrissy Hannemann thanked Nicki Brammer, Sen. Brammer’s wife, for serving on the new school board.
Motion:

Andrew Young moved to have Action/Discussion Item A – Resolution R2026-09 the appointment of the
City Prosector heard next on the agenda. Jessica Smuin seconded the motion. The motion was approved
unanimously.

VII. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Resolution R2026-09 appointing Carl Hollan as the City Prosecutor
Attorney Carl Hollan was invited to the microphone.
Mr. Hollan said he lives in Utah County and has been practicing in government for 14 years, mostly in
prosecution. He offered to answer questions from the council.
Andrew Young said that Mr. Hollan has litigated more serious criminal cases than we typically see in
Alpine. Here we mostly have shoplifting, DUIs, traffic citations and trespassing. Andrew had concerns
about the retainer of $75,000. He wondered if we could pay on an as-needed basis to be more cost effective.
Mayor Carla Merril said that this is the going rate for a prosecutor.
Shane Sorensen said that initially David Church took care of prosecution, but when he became too busy,
we hired Tucker Hansen. When Mr. Hansen gave notice of his retirement, we requested applications. There
are not many firms that handle this, and we are grateful to have Mr. Hollan join us. This will not increase
costs for the city. We are fortunate that Highland runs the Justice Court. We pay our monthly assessment
to Highland and they handle the operations, which places less burden on our staff.
Mayor Carla Merrill said she understands Andrew’s concern about fiscal responsibility, but this is cost of
business to provide a service to residents and have their cases heard in a timely manner. Residents do not
need to travel to Provo for their speeding tickets and other small matters.
Police Chief Brian Gwilliam said he would be in frequent contact with Mr. Hollan. The job often requires
after-hours and middle-of-the-night calls, and we have that option because the prosecutor is on retainer.
He does not want to sacrifice timely access as it is important for cases to move quickly through the
subpoena and court processes.
City Attorney Steve Doxey said that trials or hearings may have associated fees that can be billed on a
piece rate, but prosecutors are always paid a flat fee per month.
Andrew Young asked what Mr. Hollan likes about Alpine.
Mr. Hollan said he grew up in Orem and now lives in Spanish Fork. He appreciates how Highland has
maintained its character through all the growth in the county, and he agrees with Sen. Brammer that Alpine
is a place where people want to settle. He appreciates the good work of the mayor and City Council along
with the police and fire departments and hopes that his service will help residents feel safe and contribute
to a positive environment.
Chrissy Hannemann thanked Mr. Hollan for applying for the job and asked what appealed to him about
the position.
Mr. Hollan said that he worked in the Attorney General’s office for four years and is now the Executive
Director of the Utah Statewide Association of Prosecutors & Public Attorneys. He represents them in the
legislature, the governor’s office, and at the Supreme Court. This is the perfect size contract so he can be

CC 1/27/2026

Page 12 of 112

3
in the courtroom, keep a pulse on the communities, and know the issues to take to the state. He worked
with Chief Gwilliam previously and feels that this is a great opportunity.
Sarah Blackwell said she is pleased to have someone so qualified in the position.
Shane Sorensen said that Highland City will also vote on Mr. Hollan’s appointment this week.
Motion:

Jessica Smuin moved to approve Resolution R2026-09 appointing Carl Hollan as the City Prosecutor.
Chrissy Hannemann seconded the motion. There were 4 yes votes, 0 no votes, and 1 excused, as recorded
below. The motion passed.
Yes
Sarah Blackwell
Chrissy Hannemann
Jessica Smuin
Andrew Young

No

Excused
Brent Rummler

Heidi Smith reported that Ryan Robinson had now joined the meeting by Zoom.
III.

WORK SESSION
Presentation of the Pressurized Irrigation & Sewer Master Plans – Horrocks Engineers
John Schiess from Horrocks Engineers said they used the same process for the Pressurized Irrigation (PI) Master
Plan as they did for culinary water. They determine existing deficiencies, recommend improvements, and look
to the future.
The PI system needs to be brought up to the declared level of service. This includes pipelines, booster pumps,
a well, and tank expansions. Before Alpine had a PI system, all the water came from the culinary system, and
the state required a certain level of output. When the PI system was designed, Alpine opted for double the
required capacity at that time. Residents are now using even more than that amount. Because we have meters
in place and a rate schedule, we can encourage conservation. The plan suggests upgrades to meet current usage,
but if residents use less, fewer improvements will be needed.
Most of the PI water supply is in the lower zone, but the excess demand is in the upper areas of town. Many of
the recommendations are how to move the water up higher where it is needed.
Shane Sorensen added that we have bottlenecks in the system because of high demand. Pressure problems are
common in the upper elevations.
The council and staff discussed specific issues:
Comparing the 2021 study with the 2025 study – The projected costs have more than doubled. This is because
construction costs have increased dramatically in the last five years. The 2021 study showed deficits, but
the council did not move forward because we had good rain and snowfall then.
Use projections – Alpine is currently at a 1.1 percent growth rate. The study projections are not population
based but are tied to land use and zoning. If parcel sizes decrease, the demand goes up. Larger parcels
generally use less water. For a one-acre lot we assume 66 percent is landscaped. For half-acre lots it is 63
percent. When someone builds a house, we can then use their actual meter data for projections.
Impact fees – If we have existing pipe and need to upsize to serve growth, we cannot charge the replacement
of the whole line to impact fees. The replacement of the existing portion must be charged to current residents,
and the upsize can be charged to growth through impact fees.
Conservation – Experience shows that while education may have a small effect, the biggest factor in compliance
is high user rates. However, some residents spend a million dollars on their landscaping, and they have the
resources to pay for the water to keep it healthy. This is a challenge and makes conservation tough to enforce.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 13 of 112

4
The city has applied for a grant to help with education and conservation efforts. The EyeOnWater app is a
great way for residents to track their usage and be notified when a leak develops.
Timing of projects – The schedule suggests spreading out the projects, so they are not all in one year. The
mainline upsizes have a ten-year timeline. The existing deficiencies need to be solved first. Projects required
at buildout should actually be completed before that time, or we will develop more existing deficiencies
along the way.
Location of the water – The mid and high zones are under-supplied. Spring runoff access and the restricted
dates for Alpine to use the water make springtime complicated.
Alpine Irrigation Co. – The city has a partnership with the Company based on a 100-year agreement. When we
installed the PI system, Alpine was required to provide PI service to everyone served by the Alpine Irrigation
Company, whether in Alpine or Highland. Their board is somewhat frustrated because they are doing their
part by providing water access, but the city has not solved the delivery problems yet. Alpine City holds
about 40 percent of the shares in the Company, and we want to maintain a great relationship with them.
Their annual shareholder meeting is in November.
Quickest Solutions – Heritage Hills Well and the booster pump on 400 West will yield the fastest results. The
process is to determine the funding, obtain council approval, send the project to an engineering firm for
design, send it out for bids, award the bid, and start construction. The booster pump and lines could be
designed in 4-6 months and constructed in an additional 4-6 months. Well construction requires that a test
well is drilled to confirm the hydrogeology. The well would take two or three years to build. The estimates
include engineering, test well, and construction costs.
Mayor Carla Merrill invited Jeff Davis, who serves on the Planning Commission and is a civil engineer and
hydrogeologist, to the mic.
Jeff Davis asked John Schiess about the Alpine wells and their capacity.
John said they update the plan if a well is decreasing in capacity.
Jeff said we have had wells go down in past years and asked about current concerns like lowering a pump or
rehab for a well.
Shane Sorensen said we have done all of those things. We lowered the pump in the Carlisle Well and have done
rehab work on the 300 North Well, which needs a new pump. Repairs and maintenance are paid from the bund
balance.
Jeff said that those maintenance projects are not part of the master plan. Residents need to know that when a
well is built it does not just go forever. Maintenance is also required.
John explained that these master plans are mostly capacity related, not focused on maintenance. Those costs
are handled through the normal budget.
Jeff commented that the area near Alpine Elementary has deficiencies and low pressure. Residents are very
aware of this. He asked what is planned to remedy these problems and how the Heritage Hills Well would help.
John said if the Heritage Hills Well were built, a pressure-reducing station would send water to the lower zone
to help fix pressure problems there.
Shane explained that when water pressures drop, the valve would open to feed more water through. Sometimes,
however, it takes too much pressure from the zone above.
Jeff said this is a big job with modeling and engineering and John Schiess has done great work.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 14 of 112

5
Mayor Carla Merrill asked if Jeff Davis agreed that the priority projects should be the Heritage Hills Well and
the 400 West boosters.
Jeff agreed with those priorities.
Chrissy Hannemann asked Jeff about the process of building the well, how to choose the location, and the
likelihood of getting the water we need.
Jeff said we do not randomly select well sites. The Heritage Hills Well had a well site study completed a while
ago. They looked at the geology and where the water was moving. Even with a study, it does not mean there is
a 100 percent guaranteed flow. It is always a risk.
Mayor Carla Merrill asked how the risk is mitigated by drilling a pilot well.
Jeff said it lowers the risk because you are not installing infrastructure before you are confident in the location.
The timeline for a pilot well depends on the experience of the driller.
Jessica Smuin asked if this would be a primary or secondary source for PI.
John said it would be primary source, because it is in the upper zone where we do not have enough capacity,
especially in the spring. We cannot get ground water until July 10.
Mayor Carla Merrill thanked John Schiess and Jeff Davis for presenting the information.
The mayor said the council would take a break before the Sewer Master Plan to hear public comments.
V.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Susanne Peterson – 1230 East, Alpine
Susanne wanted to address the historic marker at the entrance to the North Cemetery. There are 11 names on
the plaque and only one is a woman, (and there is a question about whether it should be Mary McDonald or
Sarah Ferguson McDonald). Susanne would like to see the marker updated and expanded to include the pioneer
women who deserve to be recognized, like her ancestor, Jane Taylor Nelson.
She would also like to encourage Alpine to consider senior developments like the Brookstone and Ivory
neighborhoods which are located south of Timpanogos Highway. These homes are geared for active seniors
and are larger independent living units.
Sullivan Love – Scenic Drive, Alpine
Sullivan is the TSSD board chairman and wanted to offer clarifications about the TSSD discussion during the
last City Council meeting.
The TSSD board does not recommend who should serve on their board. That decision is left up to the individual
cities. The explosive growth in the valley requires the plant to be expanded, and new regulations also
necessitate extensive upgrades. Construction costs have doubled and tripled since the Covid era. Even with
engineers serving on the Board, they cannot eliminate inflation in the construction sector. A comment was made
about districts being taxing entities. To clarify, the TSSD is not currently a taxing entity, and no one is
expressing the desire to tax residents for their wastewater services. The board members take their fiduciary
responsibilities very seriously and are always concerned about the cost of projects.
Adam Sidwell – Silver Lane, Alpine
Adam reported that city open space near his home was recently cleared out. The residents were not informed
about this and were distraught about the results, and this action destroyed the natural beauty of the area. Adam
acknowledged that detention basins need to be maintained, but this area was mowed down to the dirt. He and
his neighbors would like to see careful consideration about how our open spaces are treated and suggest
planting trees in the open space.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 15 of 112

6
August Bateman – 600 East, Alpine
August is a landscape architect and was surprised at the clearing of the open space in his neighborhood. Open
spaces are important and need to be maintained, but he was concerned about the destruction. He is pleased
that the council is working on the Parks Master Plan and hopes that no other open spaces are destroyed like
this, but that we have a thoughtful plan to maintain them.
Steve Burrows – Meadowlark Drive, Alpine
Steve appreciated the information presented by Horrocks Engineers. Steve has read both the 2021 and 2025
plans and thinks Alpine needs to take action to fund the water projects and support water needs. We rely on
Mother Nature, conservation, and policies to build infrastructure and distribute water. Mother Nature is not
cooperating, and we will have deficiencies in water. He proposed a public meeting before April 15 to inform
citizens about our priorities and plans and what the city is doing to solve the problem. Conservation has limited
capability, but education has a lot of potential. We need conservation goals for the future, so we have the water
we need.
The council returned to the Work Session.
III.

WORK SESSION
Sewer Master Plan
John Schiess said that our sewer system is in better shape than the water systems. Sewer generation has been
trending down for years, and even with population growth the discharge is less. The improvements that are
suggested are construction related issues. Alpine’s capacity is good, even looking ahead to buildout. The
proposed impact fee increases are minimal.
Shane Sorensen said that there is a bill in the legislature that would allow detached accessory dwelling units
(ADUs). Alpine has allowed interior ADUs for a long time. If the bill goes through and people start building
detached structures, he asked what impact it would have on capacity and our master plan.
John said we have a little bit of extra capacity, but if there are substantial zoning changes we need to look at
the master plans to assess adverse impact. If there are a few new ADUs it probably will not matter, but if many
ADUs are added, capacity needs to be reevaluated.
Mayor Carla Merrill asked if we would need to do another study immediately if the ADU law is passed.
John said it would require an update to the study with an estimate of how many new ADUs would be added.
This would also impact sewer and culinary water systems, but not PI.
Shane commented that there is talk of a bill to require cities to allow 5,400 square foot lots. Currently our
minimum is 10,000 square feet. This might be a zoning change that could affect capacity as well.
Sarah Blackwell confirmed that the master plan shows we will not need improvements at buildout.
John said that was correct.
Sarah asked if the state passes the detached ADU requirement, can we say that it will not work in Alpine?
Shane said we will have to wait and see what comes through the legislature.
Chrissy Hannemann asked why sewage production is going down.
John explained that with new plumbing standards, low flow toilets, conservation shower heads and other
measures, it has decreased the amount of water going down the drain. We are also trending toward smaller
households.
Chrissy Hannemann pointed out that the fastest growing demographic in the United States is people living
alone. They do not need a huge house, and ADUs could serve that population. She asked how residents
constructing large additions to their homes would affect the model.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 16 of 112

7
John said that electronic meters really give us accurate data for how much water is going down the drain.
Enlarged homes do not necessarily mean they will use more water, as the family size is often the same as before.
The ERU calculations are adjusted to match the actual usage.
Chrissy asked for clarification on the impact fee tables on Page 30.
John explained the details about the table and impact fees and said he would re-check the numbers on Tables
12 and 13.
Jessica Smuin asked if we want to offer different housing models and smaller homes for people as they age,
does this study address that?
John said that the study addresses buildout at the current zoning. If we change zoning and add more density,
we need to update the studies. Adding more bathrooms does not necessarily mean more sewage is generated.
Shane said that when the state forced cities to allow internal ADUs (like basement apartments) they said cities
cannot charge impact fees for that. Some cities did and had to stop. We have to look at historical flow and
averages per connection. The sewer trend is opposite of the water trends.
John explained that they take culinary meter measurements in the winter to get accurate numbers for the sewer
system. That is why we update master plans regularly. Additional toilets and square footage do not necessarily
mean extra usage.
Jessica Smuin summarized that our water capacity cannot handle growth, but our sewer system can.
Shane Sorensen agreed and said that is why the impact fees are different.
Chrissy Hannemann asked if every ADU counts as an ERU?
John said that ADUs are on the same meter as house, so they cannot split them out.
Sullivan Love, TSSD Board Chair, was invited to the mic.
Sullivan said that Lehi City did a study on ADUs. They found that the ADUs they were adding increased the
water and sewer usage substantially. They wanted to push back on the state refusal to allow impact fees to be
collected. It is common for homes to be marketed with the enticement that people can build an accessory
apartment to rent in their basement, and it will supplement their mortgage payments. Selling a home with an
additional living unit will create more discharge. If this is the case, it makes sense to collect more than one
impact fee because of the increased discharge into the system.
Mayor Merrill has talked with legislators who said that the cities should have planned better. She countered
that we cannot charge every home a double impact fee. She is concerned about detached ADUs because it will
increase capacity, and we have large lots in Alpine that could accommodate detached ADUs. It would be
expensive to increase capacity for both the water and sewer systems.
Mayor Carla Merrill thanked John Schiess and Sullivan Love for sharing their expertise.
V.

ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
Jeff Guptill – Ponderosa Drive, Alpine
Jeff has been in Alpine for four years and loves it. He appreciates the council thinking about water and the
community needs to know what is happening. Residents are concerned about Canyon Crest Road and the speeds
there. In Planning Commission last week, they discussed the studies on a roundabout at Ridge Drive and
Canyon Crest. Jeff personally did a survey of homes around Silverleaf Park, Ridge Drive, and Canyon Crest
Road. The consensus is that residents there like the idea of a roundabout. They appreciate how the Main Street
roundabout functions, even with the backed-up traffic from Mountainville Academy. Residents do not want
traffic lights or three-way stops but want to keep the traffic moving. He encouraged the council to support the
roundabout.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 17 of 112

8

IV.

CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approve City Council Minutes from January 13th City Council Meeting
B. Approval of Payment – Cab and Chassis for New Dump Truck, Premier Truck Group: $160,787.00
C. Resolution R2026-08: Approval of Amended Consolidated Fee Schedule – (PI Rates)

Motion:

Sarah Blackwell moved to change Consent Calendar Item C - Resolution R2026-08 Amendments to the
Consolidated Fee Schedule to become Item B in Section VII - Action/Discussion Items. The motion was
seconded by Chrissy Hannemann. The motion was approved unanimously.
Andrew Young asked about modifications to the minutes, and if council members could change their vote,
reframe their comments, or add clarifications.
Mayor Carla Merrill said that if council members have questions or do not feel that the minutes portray
what actually happened in the meeting, they should email the City Recorder. Votes cannot be changed after
the fact, and this is why council should come prepared to discuss the agenda items. There is always a live
recording of the meeting that anyone can access as a public record.
Andrew Young said that the cost for the dump truck was outrageous, and this agenda item is just the cab
and chassis. He wants to find a more economical way to do this and has looked up used trucks and
government auction vehicles.
Shane Sorensen explained that the new truck is replacing a 35-year-old truck that is worn out. This is a 10wheeler with a double rear axle so it will haul more materials and be more efficient than our smaller trucks.
It will not be equipped with a sander and snowplow, so it will be ready when it is needed for water line
breaks and other emergencies. This truck was already approved by the council during budget discussions
and has been ordered.
Andrew Young said he personally buys used vehicles for economy. With all the projects council members
are proposing, he would like to take more time to explore used options. He cannot support this item because
of the high cost.
Mayor Carla Merrill said that used trucks require more maintenance and experience more down time. We
also do not know how well they were maintained. Our staff takes excellent care of the trucks and stretches
their usefulness for as long as they can. When we have a water main break, we may not have time to
schedule deliveries through a materials vendor. This truck will last a long time.
Chrissy Hanneman says she has dealt with this vendor frequently, and in her accounting job one client
usually spends over $200,000 on each truck they buy. Big trucks have big engines and fixing them is
expensive. We can get extended life by buying a new truck and caring for it well. This is a reasonable price
for the truck.
Jessica Smuin asked about projects that would require a large truck like this.
Shane Sorensen said that they will use it to haul gravel, asphalt, and concrete throughout the year. The
Lambert parking lot expansion will benefit from having this hauling capacity. The council has already gone
through the approval process and committed to purchase this truck with specific options. We submitted a
PO and the truck has been produced. It would be bad business to cancel a purchase at this point. This
purchase will be paid from several funds that are used for equipment.
Sarah Blackwell asked how we evaluate our equipment a justify new purchases.
Shane Sorensen explained that Public Works maintains an equipment schedule with an assigned life. At
the end of that life, they evaluate to see if it can be stretched further. For example, an air compressor may
typically last 20 years, but they have one that is still operating. The city does not buy used equipment

CC 1/27/2026

Page 18 of 112

9
because if it is being sold, it has a problem and could become a maintenance burden. We have had good
luck with this philosophy, and we do not buy large trucks every year.
Andrew Young said he thinks we can still find a truck that has been well maintained, and he does not see
how we can accomplish other budget goals with this type of expense.
Jessica Smuin asked for clarification on the PO and if it was like a deposit.
Chrissy Hannemann said that when we receive an invoice from the company the PO stage is over and the
sale is done.
Motion:

Andrew Young moved to approve the Consent Calendar, but to remove Item B until we can sufficiently
research other economic options to help us reach budget goals and respect residents hard earned tax dollars.
There was no second. The motion failed.

Motion:

Chrissy Hannemann moved to approve Consent Calendar items A and B as presented. Sarah Blackwell
seconded the motion. There were 3 yes votes, 1 no vote, and 1 excused, as recorded below. The motion
passed.
Yes
Sarah Blackwell
Chrissy Hannemann
Jessica Smuin

VI.

No
Andrew Young

Excused
Brent Rummler

REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS
A. Open and Public Meetings Act Training (OPMA)
City Attorney Steve Doxey presented the Open and Public Meetings Act (OPMA) training that is required
by the state once a year. Mr. Doxey explained that the Consent Calendar is supposed to streamline the
meeting. If council members want to discuss the proposals in detail, they should move them to the Action
Item section of the meeting, as Sarah Blackwell did tonight.
The purpose of OPMA is to make sure that the public’s business is done in public. The Alpine City Council
should conduct their deliberations openly. A meeting is the convening of a public body following the
processes provided by law to receive comments or discuss or act upon a matter over which the body has
jurisdiction when a quorum is present.
This is a public meeting. It has been noticed and there is a quorum present. Examples that are not public
meetings are a chance or social gathering, a gathering where a quorum is not present, or a planned gathering
at which public matters are not deliberated or acted upon. A quorum of the council may attend Alpine
Days, but they are not acting upon public matters. For emergency meetings, notice must be given 24 hours
in advance and must include an agenda. The public attends meetings because they are invested in an item
on the agenda. It is important that the council confine their discussions to what is on the agenda.
The council should not evade the OPMA by holding smaller meetings about council business where a
quorum is not present. They should also avoid using texts, emails, or other methods to conduct private
conversations among council members about matters that are before the council. Such communications,
even if they are one-way, are public records and are subject to disclosure under GRAMA. Council
discussions in our meetings are recorded, and the audio must be published within three business days. It is
important to be careful of what you say and how you say it, because it will be a public record.
The Public Comment portion is for residents to address the council about issues. They can request agenda
items with approval from the mayor or two council members. This is the public’s business. It is important
that council members do not initiate conversations with attendees during the meeting, engage in political
grandstanding, or ask for a raise of hands for those in agreement or opposition. Of course we care about
what the public wants, but it is most helpful if we conduct our business as a council and staff. If the mayor
wants more public input, she can request it.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 19 of 112

10
Voting it done publicly and there are no secret ballots. Your votes will be part of the public record. For
some matters, a roll call vote will be required. For simple matters, it can be just yay or nay.
Closed meetings, previously called executive sessions, are allowed only for certain purposes. In a duly
noticed open meeting, two-thirds of the council must vote in favor to have a closed meeting. The council
member must state the specific purpose of the meeting and where it will be located. There are three main
reasons for a closed meeting. They are to discuss: 1) reasonably imminent litigation, 2) the purchase,
exchange, lease, or sale of real property, 3) the professional character, conduct, or competence of personnel.
The meeting must stay on topic, and no final action or decision can be made in a closed meeting.
We have a resolution in Alpine to allow electronic meetings and require that a quorum is present at the
anchor location. The exception is if the mayor deems it unsafe to gather, a remote meeting without an
anchor location may be held. This decision must be submitted by the mayor in writing and expires after 30
days.
The public may report violations of OPMA, and we want to steer clear of those situations. In summary, do
the business of the public in public and you will not have trouble.
Council members had questions about specific issues.
-

Attending the same professional conference session or presentation - Mr. Doxey said that it is
permissible to attend the same meeting, but if council members got together afterwards for a discussion
about how it applies to Alpine City, that would technically be an improper meeting. It is important to
avoid the appearance of improper meetings.

-

No action in a closed meeting - Council members may not take action during a closed meeting. A case
in point, within the last two years the council wanted to make an offer and acquire some property, but
it had to be done quickly. In a closed meeting, council members expressed their views, but they did
not make an offer. They directed staff to make an offer, and that action was then approved as a
resolution in an open and duly noticed public meeting.
Shane Sorensen added that with a property purchase, staff will bring a resolution to the council with a
real estate contract, obtain their approval, and then follow through on the purchase.

Motion:

Jessica Smuin moved to extend the meeting until the business of the city was complete. Andrew Young
seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously.
Mr. Doxey answered additional questions about OPMA.
-

Roll call votes – A roll call vote is needed to make a decision on an ordinance, a resolution, or to
expend city funds. Motions to adjourn, move agenda items, or other procedural matters only require a
simple majority vote.

-

Phone and other conversations between council members – Communication and sharing ideas is okay,
but coming to a private consensus ahead of time is not good. Decisions should not be scripted in
advance of the meeting. This undermines transparency. If staff send out information through email, it
is best to reply only to the staff, instead of ‘Reply All,’ which could be construed as an electronic
meeting among council members.

-

Public comment on agenda items – OPMA does not stipulate that the public may not speak about items
on the agenda. This is up to the discretion of the mayor. The Public Comment portion of the meeting
is for listening. If council members then begin a discussion on the topic, they are essentially holding a
meeting about something that was not officially noticed. It is most appropriate to follow up with the
public after the meeting.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 20 of 112

11
B. FY2026 Second Quarter Financial Report
Shane Sorensen said that he usually gives the monthly financial report at the first meeting of the month.
However, our last meeting had a lengthy agenda, so we are reviewing it tonight. The first page shows the
fund balances in each fund. We received $1M from a grant reimbursement for street maintenance, and it
will show up in the report after the mid-year budget adjustment. We have also received our main property
tax distribution. Our sales tax revenue goes up and down, but recently the trend is upward.
Shane explained the graphs and mentioned some specific details:
• The Carlton shop purchase should close in February.
• The Canyon Crest PI project has been paid for.
• Large street and storm drain projects were completed.
• Water and sewer enterprise funds are up because we have not had recent projects.
• A property purchase lowered the balance in recreation impact fees
• The fire station project should start in May, so funds are allocated for that. This project will roll
over into the next budget year.
• We will do maintenance on some PI wells to prepare for the watering season.
Chrissy Hannemann pointed out that funds which are allocated for the fire station and other projects are
sitting in the Capital Improvement Fund. The only debt we are paying off as a city is for the pressurized
irrigation system. She clarified that new pumps and other repairs are paid from the PI fund balance.
VII. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
B. Resolution R2026-08 Approval of the Amended Consolidatd Fee Schedule – PI rates
Shane Sorensen explained we had a consultant conduct a pressurized irrigation rate study when we
switched from flat rates to metered rates. The rate model was complicated because of our obligation to
shareholders in the irrigation company. Considering our capital facilities plan and other needs, a three
percent increase was built into the rate structure for five years. The increase goes into effect with the
January bill each year, and this is the fourth year of the five-year increase. With the increased expense of
construction projects now, three percent is not enough to cover our costs.
Andrew Young had questions about user fees and if we are using these funds to supplement other areas.
Shane said that it was part of our PI agreement with the irrigation company that we would not transfer
funds from PI to other areas.
Andrew asked why the shareholders are also charged the three percent increase.
Shane Sorensen explained that if we are not getting water out of the creeks we must pump, and those costs
go up every year. The irrigation company knows that the three percent increase is part of the agreement,
and that the city can periodically raise rates. Shane read through the agreement and we are in compliance.
Andrew said he would like to pay for increased utility costs from money saved in other areas instead of
raising user rates. He cannot support the rate increase.
Shane Sorensen said that Mark Anderson with Zions Public Finance came to talk to the Finance Committee
on Thursday. Mark is a former City Manager for Heber City, so he has years of experience on both sides
of the equation. Our enterprise (utility) funds should be like a business that pays for what goes on within
that system. User fees, impact fees, and bonding come into play.
Motion:

Chrissy Hannemann moved to approve Resolution R2026-08 adopting The Consolidated Fee Schedule
with amendments as outlined. Jessica Smuin seconded the motion. There were 3 yes votes, 1 no vote, and
1 excused, as recorded below. The motion passed.
Yes
Sarah Blackwell
Chrissy Hannemann

CC 1/27/2026

No
Andrew Young

Excused
Brent Rummler

Page 21 of 112

12
Jessica Smuin
C. Ordinance 2026-04: Public Facilities Zone Setbacks
Ryan Robinson, who recently accepted a new job as a city administrator for Enoch City, said that after
three days in his new position he appreciates Shane Sorensen even more
Ryan said that this ordinance for the Public Facilities Zone (PFZ) presents language similar to the Business
Commercial Zone. City property and schools are the only entities in the PFZ. Churches are excluded. As
an example, if the city needs to build a pump house on our property with smaller setbacks, this gives us
the ability to send it through the Planning Commission and City Council to seek an exception. The Planning
Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously to recommend approval. This change does not
require that city or school projects will have smaller setbacks, it just provides the option to seek an
exception.
Shane Soresnsen said that the fire station is not in our Business Commercial Zone anymore, it is now in
the PFZ. This requires residential setbacks, and there was not an option to apply for an exception.
Jessica Smuin asked for clarification on how exceptions would be determined.
Shane Sorensen said that the ordinance states that a reduced setback may be considered when justified by
sight specific circumstances and when recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the
City Council, and in no case shall an approved setback on a corner lot be less than 18 feet.
Andrew Young suggested that language be added to say, “so long as it does not impede the views of a
resident.” This would prevent the city from constructing a tall building to block their views.
Motion:

Jessica Smuin moved to table Ordinance 2026-04 the proposed amendments to Development Code
3.08.050 to allow staff to come up with language to address residential views if an exception is allowed.
Andrew Young seconded the motion. There were 4 yes votes, and 1 excused, as recorded below. The
motion passed.
Yes
Sarah Blackwell
Chrissy Hannemann
Jessica Smuin
Andrew Young

No

Excused
Brent Rummler

Chrissy Hannemann suggested that if we add view protection language to the PFZ, we should also add it
for residential areas, so the code is uniform throughout the city.
Ryan Robinson said that Andrew Young and Sarah Blackwell have submitted language for a view
protection ordinance that will be on the agenda for the Planning Commission soon.
D. Ordinance 2026-05: Senior Housing Overlay Amendments
Ryan Robinson explained that several years ago the state mandated a specific subdivision review process.
This ordinance cleans up the language for the Senior Housing Overlay and brings our code into compliance
with the state.
Andrew Young had questions about the state code and if it applied to Business Commercial or overlay
zones. He asked about the City Council role in approving senior overlays.
Mayor Carla Merrill explained that if a developer is applying for an overlay, they must go through both
the Planning Commission and the City Council to see if it is a good decision for our city. Once that is
approved, it is no longer a legislative decision but an administrative process. The developers would work
with staff after that.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 22 of 112

13
Attorney Steve Doxey said that the specific subdivision statute applies to single-family homes and twin
homes. The action to allow an overlay zone on a particular project is a legislative decision. If a developer
wanted to build a subdivision with single-family homes in the CR 40,000 zone, it would be an
administrative decision unless they asked for a PRD. This proposed language change does not relinquish
any rights of the council for oversight.
Mayor Carla Merrill reiterated that this brings our code into compliance with state law.
Ryan Robinson said that the language in the code says that the City Council has to approve a development
agreement as part of an overlay re-zone.
Mr. Doxey confirmed that a development agreement is part of an overlay zone approval in state code and
we cannot change that. The final subdivision plat approval is administrative, as required by state code.
Andrew Young asked if the development agreement approval would allow the council to have a say in the
density, parking, and other issues.
Mr. Doxey said that those issues would be part of the overlay zone approval. If an overlay zone is
conditioned upon the development agreement, the developer has to comply with those specifications.
Ryan Robinson added that density and parking requirements are already spelled out in the code.
Andrew Young said he thinks that the zoning and the uniqueness of senior housing projects is beyond the
scope of state law. This is very different from standard subdivisions in residential zones. We are trying to
adhere to state code, but we are going too far.
Mayor Carla Merrill asked if he wanted to separate a senior overlay with congregate living and a senior
overlay with single family dwelling units.
Mr. Doxey said he does not think it matters under the Land Use, Development, and Management Act
(LUDMA), because the administrative subdivision approval procedure only applies to single-family, twofamily, and town home dwellings. Congregate living would not fall under this code. The state code does
not apply to commercial buildings or congregate living.
Shane Sorensen clarified that in Alpine senior housing is limited to single units or two attached units.
Ryan Robinson explained that this change says we will follow the subdivision ordinance for single or
double units. If a multi-family project were proposed, it would have different standards.
Motion:

Sarah Blackwell moved to approve proposed code amendment to the Alpine Development code 3.18.080
regarding the Senior Housing Overlay Zone review process as presented, based on the finding that the
amendment is consistent with the General Plan and brings city code into compliance with Utah Code.
Chrissy Hannemann seconded the motion. There were 3 yes votes, 1 no vote, and 1 excused, as recorded
below. The motion passed.
Yes
Sarah Blackwell
Chrissy Hannemann
Jessica Smuin

No
Andrew Young

VIII. STAFF REPORTS
Shane Sorensen said he would email his updates to the council members.

CC 1/27/2026

Excused
Brent Rummler

Page 23 of 112

14
IX.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Jessica Smuin reported that some large trees have fallen at the poppy garden, and she thinks the lack of water
is a problem. We need to evaluate the existing trees and may need to hand-water the garden if we do not
get enough precipitation. This may also influence whether we can open the gardens for public viewing
this year. She would like security cameras to be considered a top priority.
Jessica also serves on the history committee and would like to expand the committee to work with arts
and culture as well.
Shane Sorensen said he can review the committee guidelines with Attorney Doxey.
Sarah Blackwell met with Nicki Christensen to coordinate the Alpine Youth Council calendar. She is also
working with Bethany Sorensen to create a Google doc for community service ideas and would like to
encourage more involvement. Sarah will be meeting with Josh from the American Fork Chamber of
Commerce on Thursday.
Chrissy Hannemann said the Finance Committee had a presentation on bonding which was very informative
and provided good context. Alpine City does not require the huge bonds that are needed for school
districts, so we have more options.
Andrew Young met with the Sculpture Garden Committee, and they are open to options and ideas. For about
$20,000 they can create four small statutes. This will be a donor project, and Andrew wants to get
resident feedback. He will also be helping with fundraising. He was inspired by the bronze family statue
recently installed in Lehi City for around $150,000.
Andrew said he would like to see our fence ordinance improved. Regarding the WUI map, the state
representative who created it told Andrew that as we implement fire mitigation our insurance premiums
should go down. He encouraged council members to visit the Legislature and share their ideas.
Sarah Blackwell requested that Andrew email her a list of bills that might affect Alpine City.
Jessica Smuin commented that the Sculpture Garden Committee wants to move forward and will pay for
the landscaping upgrade by City Hall.
Mayor Carla Merrill said that there will be an open house to meet the new superintendent of our Aspen Peaks
School District tomorrow night. She will send additional information in an email

Motion:

Andrew Young moved to adjourn the meeting. Chrissy Hannemann seconded the motion. The motion was
approved unanimously.

The meeting was adjourned at 10:22 pm.

CC 1/27/2026

Page 24 of 112

Sales Estimate
Date:
2/6/26
Estimate# KTP020626
Job #:

NICKERSON COMPANY, INC
801-973-8888

*Estimate good for 10 days*
Customer: ALPINE CITY
Attention: JASON
Pages: 3
Phone: 801-756-6347
Email: [email protected]
SHIPPING TERMS
QTY
1.00

ITEM

Important Notes:

Unless specifically indicated below, price does not include shipping,
sales tax, installation, discharge piping, electrical controls or
wiring. Please read, sign and return Terms and Conditions of
Sales.

PAYMENT TERMS
Net 30 Days
DESCRIPTION
NICKERSON TO DRIVE TO SITE, PULL PUMP,
BRING PUMP BACK TO SHOP FOR TEAR DOWN
AND INSPECTION, RETURN TO SITE FOR
WELL INSPECTION VIDEO. (ESTIMATED AT 1000')

Due to current economic conditions, pricing and
leadtimes are subject to change without notice.
Please note: Pricing does not include
any applicable taxes. These charges will
be added to your invoice. A 3% processing fee will
be added to all Credit Card orders over $2,000.00
Quote prepared by: Kyle Polatis
Thank you for your business!
2301 West Indiana Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Phone: (801) 973-8888 - Fax: 801-973-8267

DUE DATE

$

UNIT PRICE
10,340.00

$

LINE TOTAL
10,340.00

Freight:
Not Included
Sales Tax:
Not Included
10,340.00
Total $

Page 25 of 112

Budget Report for January 2026
Alpine City - General Fund
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Property taxes
Redemption taxes
Sales tax
Motor vehicle taxes
Franchise fees
Penalties & interest on delinquent
Total Taxes
License and Permits
Business license & fees
Plan check fees
Building permits
Building permit assessment
Total License and Permits
Intergovernmental Revenue
Municipal grant
Boradband planning grant
Othr grants
Total Intergovernmental
Charges For Service
Zoning & subdivision fees
Annexation applications
Sale of maps and publications
Public safety district rental
Waste collections sales
Youth council
Sale of cemetery lots
Burial fees
Total Charges for Service
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines
Other fines
Traffic school
Total Fines and Forfeitures
Rents & Other Revenues
Recycling
Rents & concessions
Sale of City land
Total Rents & Other Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

2,704,800
225,000
2,100,000
135,000
750,000
4,500
5,919,300

$

25,000
175,000
350,000
5,000
555,000

$

29,122
29,122

$

5,000
500
250
38,516
730,000
3,000
25,000
50,000
852,266

$

75,000
7,000
2,000
84,000

$

65,000
65,000

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target

Year End
Projected
Amount

2,604,912
158,043
945,646
64,279
376,883
2,558
4,152,321

96%
70%
45%
48%
50%
57%
70%

$

11,405
120,324
190,256
1,942
323,927

46%
69%
54%
39%
58%

$

1,000,000
1,000,000

0%
0%
100%
3434%

1,600
110
19,258
472,277
3,695
22,525
42,300
561,765

32%
0%
44%
50%
65%
123%
90%
85%
66%

34,097
7,225
5,310
46,632

45%
103%
266%
56%

$

35,114
35,114

0%
54%
0%
54%

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

2,704,800
225,000
2,100,000
135,000
750,000
4,500
5,919,300

25,000
200,000
350,000
5,000
580,000

29,122
1,000,000
1,029,122

5,000
500
250
38,516
730,000
5,000
25,000
50,000
854,266

75,000
10,000
10,000
95,000

65,000
65,000

Page 26 of 112

Alpine City - General Fund-Continued
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues-continued
Interest & Misc Revenues
Interest earnings
Alpine Days revenue
Rodeo revenue
Pickleball fees
Bicentennial books
Sundry revenues
Total Miscellaneous Revenues
Transfers & Contributions
Fund balance appropriation
Contribution from Capital Projects
Contribution for paramedic
Total Contributions & Transfers
Total General Fund Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

$

95%
116%
124%
0%
78%
35%
98%

0%
58%
58%

$

$

20,423
20,423

$

35,000
35,000

$

6,457,954

82%

$

8,928,780

$

$

$

35,000
35,000

$

7,865,188

$

Year End
Projected
Amount

142,855
98,523
62,069
390
13,935
317,772

150,000
85,000
50,000
500
40,000
325,500

$

91.7%
Percent
Target

$

$

$

150,000
98,523
62,069
500
40,000
351,092

Page 27 of 112

Alpine City - General Fund-Continued
FY 2025/2026 Budget
Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures
Administration
Court
Treasurer
Elections
Government Buildings
Emergency Services
Building Inspection
Planning & Zoning
Streets
Parks & Recreation
Cemetery
Garbage
Miscellaneous
Total General Fund Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

$

285,230
51,453
37,556
19,160
107,009
1,851,209
97,980
190,423
1,004,947
426,980
121,050
397,764
6,784
4,597,545

$

1,860,409

53%
45%
62%
47%
10%
58%
55%
56%
143%
71%
56%
52%
11%
58%

$
$

516,667

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

2,487,751

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

516,667

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

-

Ending Fund Balance
Fund Balance Percentage

$

3,004,418

-

$

Year End
Projected
Amount
542,000
115,200
60,500
40,350
1,055,200
3,188,501
179,600
343,050
1,250,000
604,696
214,800
758,550
59,666
8,412,113

$

542,000
115,200
60,500
40,350
1,055,200
3,188,501
179,600
343,050
703,075
604,696
214,800
758,550
59,666
7,865,188

58.3%
Percent
Target

General Fund Balance per state law needs to between 5% and 35% (Current projected fund balance)

$

38.20%

Page 28 of 112

CLASS C ROADS & MASS TRANSIT
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Interest earnings
Class "B&C" Road allotment
Mass Transit
Public transit
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

45,000
525,000
195,000
80,000
5,000
850,000

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures
Miscellaneous
Class "B&C" road projects
Mass Transit projects
Public Transportation projects
Reserves
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

20,106
226,010
88,620
44,739
379,475

$

525,000
195,000
80,000
50,000
850,000

$

554,002
195,000
80,000
50,000
879,002

$

-

$

(499,527)

58.3%
Percent
Target
45%
43%
45%
56%
0%
45%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
0%
106%
100%
100%
100%
103%

45,000
525,000
195,000
80,000
5,000
850,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

555,000
195,000
80,000
50,000
880,000

$

(30,000)

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

1,307,037

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

(30,000)

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

50,000

Ending Fund Balance

$

1,327,037

Page 29 of 112

Recreation Impact Fee Funds
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Recreation facility fees
Interest earnings
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

100,000
40,000
145,000
285,000

$

$

Park system
Miscellaneous
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

5,376
9,716
15,092

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures

58.3%
Percent
Target
5%
24%
0%
5%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target

$

285,000
285,000

$

-

$

-

$

15,092

0%
0%
0%

100,000
40,000
145,000
285,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

285,000
285,000

$

-

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

447,207

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(145,000)

Ending Fund Balance

$

302,207

Page 30 of 112

Impact Fee Funds Streets
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Streets & transportation fees
Interest earnings
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

40,000
25,000
340,000
405,000

$

$

Streets & transport
Reserves
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

2,367
3,560
5,927

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures

58.3%
Percent
Target
6%
14%
0%
1%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target

$

405,000
405,000

$

-

$

-

$

5,927

0%
0%
0%

40,000
25,000
340,000
405,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

405,000
405,000

$

-

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

163,536

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(340,000)

Ending Fund Balance

$

(176,464)

Page 31 of 112

PARC Fund
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
PARC taxes
Interest earnings
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

100,000
100,000

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Reserves
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

52,962
2,378
55,340

$

100,000
100,000

$

39,303
39,303

$

-

$

16,037

58.3%
Percent
Target
53%
100%
0%
55%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
39%
0%
39%

100,000
5,000
105,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

100,000
100,000

$

5,000

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

103,446

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

5,000

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

-

Ending Fund Balance

$

108,446

Page 32 of 112

Alpine City - Capital Projects Fund
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Interest revenue
Transfer from General Fund
Contributions from builders
Miscellaneous
Fund Balance appropriation
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

400,000
37,296
2,792,704
3,230,000

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures
Capital outlay other
Capital outlay buildings
Capital outlay equipment
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

$

216,751
216,751

962,000
2,200,000
68,000
3,230,000
-

$

147,564
147,564

$

69,187

58.3%
Percent
Target
54%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
15%
0%
0%
5%

400,000
37,296
2,792,704
3,230,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$
$

962,000
2,200,000
68,000
3,230,000
-

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

7,922,163

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(2,792,704)

Ending Fund Balance

$

5,129,459

-

Page 33 of 112

Alpine City - Water Utility
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Operating Revenues
Metered water sales
Other water revenue
Water connection fee
Penalties
Total Miscellaneous Revenues
Miscellaneous
Interest earned
Appropriated fund balance
Total Utility Revenue
Total Utility Fund Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

$

63%
28%
28%
89%
62%

$

46%
0%
11%

$

$

82,242
82,242

$

180,000
542,725
722,725

$

656,797

40%

$

1,653,425

$

$

$

180,000
542,725
722,725

$

1,653,425

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenses
Water operating
Total Utility Fund Expenses

$
$

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

1,653,425
1,653,425
-

Year End
Projected
Amount

555,583
5,607
8,280
5,085
574,555

875,000
20,000
30,000
5,700
930,700

$

58.3%
Percent
Target

$
$

480,911
480,911

$

175,886

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
29%
29%

875,000
20,000
30,000
5,700
930,700

Year End
Projected
Amount

$
$

1,653,425
1,653,425
-

Cash Balance Beginning of Year

$

3,903,297

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(542,725)

Ending Cash Balance

$

3,360,572

Page 34 of 112

Impact Fee Funds Water Impact Fees
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Water Impact Fees
Interest earnings
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

135,000
35,000
170,000

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures
Impact fee projects
To reserves
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

66,290
17,304
83,594

$

170,000
170,000

$

5,737
5,737

$

-

$

77,857

58.3%
Percent
Target
49%
49%
0%
49%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

Target
Percent
Target
3%
0%
3%

135,000
35,000
170,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

170,000
170,000

$

-

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

823,756

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

-

Ending Fund Balance

$

823,756

Page 35 of 112

Alpine City - Sewer Utility
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Operating Revenues
Sewer system sales
Other revenue
Sewer connection fee
Total Miscellaneous Revenues
Miscellaneous
Interest earned
Appropriated fund balance
Total Utility Revenue
Total Utility Fund Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

$

63%
0%
43%
63%

$

45%
0%
13%

$

$

71,423
71,423

$

160,000
369,275
529,275

$

895,240

49%

$

1,844,275

$

$

$

160,000
369,275
529,275

$

1,844,275

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenses
Sewer operating
Total Utility Fund Expenses

$
$

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

1,844,275
1,844,275

Year End
Projected
Amount

821,692
2,125
823,817

1,300,000
10,000
5,000
1,315,000

$

58.3%
Percent
Target

716,607
716,607

$

178,633

58.3%
Percent
Target
39%
39%

Year End
Projected
Amount

$

1,844,275
1,844,275

$

-

Cash Balance Beginning of Year

$

3,417,129

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(369,275)

Ending Cash Balance

$

3,047,854

-

$
$

$

1,300,000
10,000
5,000
1,315,000

Page 36 of 112

Alpine City - Sewer Impact fee funds
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Sewer Impact Fees
Interest earnings
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

25,000
25,000

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures
Sewer Impact fee projects
To reserves
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

4,713
3,558
8,271

$

25,000
25,000

$

10,303
10,303

$

-

$

(2,032)

58.3%
Percent
Target
19%
100%
0%
33%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
41%
0%
41%

25,000
10,000
35,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

25,000
25,000

$

10,000

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

162,984

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

10,000

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

-

Ending Fund Balance

$

172,984

Page 37 of 112

Alpine City - PI Fund
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Operating Revenues
Irrigation water sales
Other revenue
PI connection fee
Impact fee transfer
PI irrigation grant
Total Miscellaneous Revenues
Miscellaneous
Interest earned
Appropriated fund balance
Total Utility Revenue
Total Utility Fund Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

$

1,150,000
1,000
40,000
1,191,000

$

$

$

60,000
1,381,329
1,441,329

$

2,632,329

$

$

PI operating
Total Utility Fund Expenses

$
$

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

70%
74%
68%
100%
146%

$

51,127
51,127

85%
0%
4%

$

60,000
1,381,329
1,441,329

$

1,789,739

68%

$

3,532,329

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

2,632,329
2,632,329

Year End
Projected
Amount

810,629
742
27,241
900,000
1,738,612

Budget
FY 2026

Expenses

83.3%
Percent
Target

1,597,152
1,597,152

$

192,587

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
61%
61%

Year End
Projected
Amount

$

2,632,329
2,632,329

$

900,000

Cash Balance Beginning of Year

$

2,557,090

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

900,000

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(1,381,329)

Ending Cash Balance

$

2,075,761

-

$
$

$

1,150,000
1,000
40,000
900,000
2,091,000

Page 38 of 112

Alpine City - Pressure Irrigation Impact fee funds
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
PI Impact Fees
Interest earnings
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

200,000
27,500
227,500

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures
PI Impact fee projects
Debt service
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

50,112
11,949
62,061

$

116,000
111,500
227,500

$

6,791
111,500
118,291

$

-

$

(56,230)

58.3%
Percent
Target
25%
43%
0%
27%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
6%
100%
52%

200,000
57,500
257,500

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

116,000
111,500
227,500

$

30,000

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

511,597

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

30,000

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

-

Ending Fund Balance

$

541,597

Page 39 of 112

Alpine City - Storm Drain Fund
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Operating Revenues
Storm drain revenue
Other revenue
SWPP fee
Storm drain impact fee
Total Miscellaneous Revenues
Miscellaneous
Interest earned
Appropriated fund balance
Total Utility Revenue
Total Utility Fund Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

$

56%
0%
28%
0%
54%

$

48%
0%
11%

$

$

22,418
22,418

$

47,000
162,150
209,150

$

138,851

33%

$

424,150

$

$

$

47,000
162,150
209,150

$

424,150

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenses

Year End
Projected
Amount

112,533
3,900
116,433

200,000
1,000
14,000
215,000

$

58.3%
Percent
Target

SD operating
Total Utility Fund Expenses

$
$

424,150
424,150

$
$

395,179
395,179

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

$

(256,328)

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
93%
93%

200,000
1,000
14,000
215,000

Year End
Projected
Amount

$

424,150
424,150

$

-

Cash Balance Beginning of Year

$

761,774

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(162,150)

Ending Cash Balance

$

599,624

Page 40 of 112

Alpine City - Storm Drain Impact fee funds
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
SD Impact Fees
Interest earnings
Appropriation of fund balance
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

25,000
11,000
14,000
50,000

$

$

SD Impact fee projects
To reserves
Total Capital Expenditures

$

Surplus/(Deficit)

1,600
2,479
4,079

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures

Target
Percent
Target
6%
23%
0%
8%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

Target
Percent
Target

$

50,000
50,000

$

-

$

-

$

4,079

0%
0%
0%

25,000
11,000
14,000
50,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

50,000
50,000

$

-

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

225,997

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(14,000)

Ending Fund Balance

$

211,997

Page 41 of 112

Alpine City - Trust & Agency Fund
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Interest revenue
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$
$

34,000
34,000

$
$

17,189
17,189

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures

58.3%
Percent
Target
51%
51%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

58.3%
Percent
Target

Interest expense
Total Expenditures

$
$

34,000
34,000

$

-

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

$

17,189

0%
0%

34,000
34,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

34,000
34,000

$

-

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

174,000

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

-

Ending Fund Balance

$

174,000

Page 42 of 112

Alpine City - Cemetery Perpetual Fund
FY 2025/2026 Budget

Revenues
Cemetery lot payments
Upright Monument
Fund appropriation
Interest revenues
Total Revenues

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026
$

$

20,000
2,500
102,500
45,000
170,000

$

$

Actual
To Date
FY 2026

Budget
FY 2026

Expenditures

67,575
1,575
38,835
107,985

Cemetery expenses
Total Expenses

$
$

170,000
170,000

$

10,200
10,200

Surplus/(Deficit)

$

-

$

97,785

58.3%
Percent
Target
338%
63%
0%
86%
64%

Year End
Projected
Amount
$

$

58.3%
Percent
Target
6%
6%

75,000
2,500
102,500
45,000
225,000

Year End
Projected
Amount
$
$

170,000
170,000

$

55,000

Fund Balance Beginning of Year

$

1,773,568

Projected Surplus/(Deficit)

$

55,000

Appropriate fund balance\Reserves

$

(102,500)

Ending Fund Balance

$

1,726,068

Page 43 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
COMBINED CASH INVESTMENT
JANUARY 31, 2026
COMBINED CASH ACCOUNTS
01-1111

CASH IN BANK, ALTA BANK

01-1112

XPRESS BILL PAY

01-1131

PETTY CASH

01-1154

SAVINGS PTIF #158

601,483.57
1,090.23
1,000.00
29,873,626.33

TOTAL COMBINED CASH
01-1190

30,477,200.13

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

(

30,477,200.13)

TOTAL GENERAL FUND CASH

.00

CASH ALLOCATION RECONCILIATION
10 ALLOCATION TO GENERAL FUND

4,310,669.41

11 ALLOCATION TO CLASS C ROADS

807,511.72

15 ALLOCATION TO RECREATION IMPACT FEES

462,299.50

16 ALLOCATION TO STREET IMPACT FEES

169,463.32

44 ALLOCATION TO PARC FUND

119,484.09

45 ALLOCATION TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND

10,207,548.58

51 ALLOCATION TO WATER FUND

3,968,295.91

52 ALLOCATION TO SEWER FUND

3,419,068.92

55 ALLOCATION TO PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION FUND

1,785,033.77

56 ALLOCATION TO STORM DRAIN FUND

784,558.53

70 ALLOCATION TO TRUST AND AGENCY FUND

813,750.44

71 ALLOCATION TO CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE FUND

1,871,352.19

81 ALLOCATION TO WATER IMPACT FEES

834,550.38

82 ALLOCATION TO SEWER IMPACT FEES

165,398.07

85 ALLOCATION TO PI IMPACT FEES

532,218.08

86 ALLOCATION TO STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES

225,997.22

TOTAL ALLOCATIONS TO OTHER FUNDS
ALLOCATION FROM COMBINED CASH FUND - 01-1190

30,477,200.13
(

30,477,200.13)

ZERO PROOF IF ALLOCATIONS BALANCE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

.00

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 1

Page 44 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
ASSETS
10-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

4,310,669.41

10-1309 DEFERRED PROPERTY TAXES REC

2,659,542.68

10-1311

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

76,470.59

TOTAL ASSETS

7,046,682.68

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES
10-2211

WAGES PAYABLE

26,854.72

10-2225 ULGT PAYABLE

6,249.88

10-2227 RETIREMENT PAYABLE EMPLOYEES

(

10-2229 WORKERS COMP PAYABLE

7,442.62)
13,317.74

10-2400 UNEARNED REVENUE

2,659,542.00

TOTAL LIABILITIES

2,698,521.72

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
10-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

2,487,751.53

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

1,860,409.43

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

4,348,160.96

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

4,348,160.96

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

7,046,682.68

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 2

Page 45 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

TAXES
10-31-10 CURRENT YEAR GENERAL PROPERTY

322,685.51

2,604,912.29

2,704,800.00

99,887.71

96.3

10-31-20 REDEMPTION TAXES

127,646.57

158,043.14

225,000.00

66,956.86

70.2

10-31-30 GENERAL SALES AND USE TAXES

227,272.80

945,645.79

2,100,000.00

1,154,354.21

45.0

10-31-31 MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES

10,910.49

64,279.20

135,000.00

70,720.80

47.6

10-31-40 FRANCHISE FEES

38,071.53

376,883.28

750,000.00

373,116.72

50.3

570.14

2,557.90

4,500.00

1,942.10

56.8

727,157.04

4,152,321.60

5,919,300.00

1,766,978.40

70.2

10-31-90 PENALTIES & INT. ON DELINQUENT
TOTAL TAXES

LICENSES AND PERMITS
10-32-10 BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS

9,725.00

11,405.24

25,000.00

13,594.76

45.6

10-32-20 PLAN CHECK FEES

11,123.30

120,323.89

175,000.00

54,676.11

68.8

10-32-21 BUILDING PERMITS

19,419.20

190,256.17

350,000.00

159,743.83

54.4

10-32-22 BUILDING PERMIT ASSESSMENT

200.47

1,942.35

5,000.00

3,057.65

38.9

TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS

40,467.97

323,927.65

555,000.00

231,072.35

58.4

29,122.00

.0

1,000,000.00)

.0

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
10-33-42 MUNICIPAL RECREATION GRANT

.00

.00

29,122.00

10-33-59 OTHER GRANTS

.00

1,000,000.00

.00

(

.00

1,000,000.00

29,122.00

(

10-34-13 ZONING AND SUBDIVISION FEES

.00

1,600.00

5,000.00

3,400.00

10-34-14 ANNEXATIONS APPLICATIONS

.00

.00

500.00

500.00

.0

10-34-15 SALE OF MAPS AND PUBLICATIONS

.00

110.00

250.00

140.00

44.0
50.0

TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE

970,878.00) 3433.8

CHARGES FOR SERVICES

10-34-22 PUBLIC SAFETY DISTRICT RENTAL

32.0

.00

19,258.00

38,516.00

19,258.00

67,526.74

472,276.89

730,000.00

257,723.11

64.7

.00

3,694.59

3,000.00

694.59)

123.2

10-34-81 SALE OF CEMETERY LOTS

2,975.00

22,525.00

25,000.00

2,475.00

90.1

10-34-83 BURIAL FEES

7,650.00

42,300.00

50,000.00

7,700.00

84.6

78,151.74

561,764.48

852,266.00

290,501.52

65.9

10-35-10 TRAFFIC FINES

4,810.00

34,097.40

75,000.00

40,902.60

45.5

10-35-15 OTHER FINES

700.00

7,225.01

7,000.00

(

225.01)

103.2

2,160.00

5,310.00

2,000.00

(

3,310.00)

265.5

7,670.00

46,632.41

84,000.00

37,367.59

55.5

10-34-40 WASTE COLLECTION SALES
10-34-69 YOUTH COUNCIL

TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES

(

FINES AND FORFEITURES

10-35-16 TRAFFIC SCHOOL
TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 3

Page 46 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

RENTS AND OTHER REVENUE
10-36-20 RENTS AND CONCESSIONS
TOTAL RENTS AND OTHER REVENUE

6,979.00

35,114.00

65,000.00

29,886.00

54.0

6,979.00

35,114.00

65,000.00

29,886.00

54.0

96,616.23

142,855.47

150,000.00

7,144.53

95.2

.00

98,522.82

85,000.00

(

13,522.82)

115.9

(

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
10-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
10-38-17 ALPINE DAYS REVENUE
10-38-18 RODEO REVENUE

.00

62,069.00

50,000.00

12,069.00)

124.1

10-38-50 BICENTENNIAL BOOKS

110.00

390.00

500.00

110.00

78.0

10-38-90 SUNDRY REVENUES

26.90

13,934.93

40,000.00

26,065.07

34.8

96,753.13

317,772.22

325,500.00

7,727.78

97.6

2,924.07

20,423.05

35,000.00

14,576.95

58.4

2,924.07

20,423.05

35,000.00

14,576.95

58.4

960,102.95

6,457,955.41

7,865,188.00

1,407,232.59

82.1

TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
10-39-20 CONTRIBUTION FOR PARAMEDIC
TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 4

Page 47 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

ADMINISTRATION
10-41-11

SALARIES & WAGES

18,920.06

139,317.68

247,500.00

108,182.32

56.3

9,813.54

70,901.89

116,500.00

45,598.11

60.9

.00

725.71

2,000.00

1,274.29

36.3

10-41-21 BOOKS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS

225.00

12,069.83

25,000.00

12,930.17

48.3

10-41-22 PUBLIC NOTICES

100.09

738.81

2,000.00

1,261.19

36.9

.00

539.47

7,500.00

6,960.53

7.2

10-41-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

4,258.53

13,808.39

15,000.00

1,191.61

92.1

10-41-25 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLIES & MAINTEN

2,425.00

2,425.00

1,500.00

925.00)

161.7

388.91

2,715.70

5,500.00

2,784.30

49.4

10-41-30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

.00

.00

45,000.00

45,000.00

.0

10-41-33 EDUCATION

.00

671.72

3,000.00

2,328.28

22.4

175.21

1,439.00

12,000.00

10,561.00

12.0

.00

97.50

5,000.00

4,902.50

2.0

10-41-51 INSURANCE

1,021.10

12,294.10

12,000.00

294.10)

102.5

10-41-63 OTHER SERVICES

12,104.81

26,078.91

36,500.00

10,421.09

71.5

10-41-64 OTHER EXPENSES

900.00

1,405.88

6,000.00

4,594.12

23.4

50,332.25

285,229.59

542,000.00

256,770.41

52.6

10-41-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
10-41-14 OVERTIME WAGES

10-41-23 TRAVEL

10-41-28 TELEPHONE

10-41-46 COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY FUND
10-41-47 MAYOR DISCRETIONARY FUND

TOTAL ADMINISTRATION

(

(

COURT
10-42-24 OFFICE EXPENSE & POSTAGE

1,232.31

7,224.39

38,000.00

30,775.61

19.0

10-42-31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

6,528.98

32,202.03

45,000.00

12,797.97

71.6

.00

.00

200.00

200.00

.0

2,116.39

12,026.57

32,000.00

19,973.43

37.6

9,877.68

51,452.99

115,200.00

63,747.01

44.7

10-42-40 WITNESS FEES
10-42-46 VICTIM REPARATION ASSESSMENT
TOTAL COURT

TREASURER
10-43-11

1,615.36

12,692.63

21,700.00

9,007.37

58.5

10-43-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

SALARIES & WAGES

964.42

7,207.96

11,700.00

4,492.04

61.6

10-43-14 OVERTIME WAGES

182.96

2,010.06

2,500.00

489.94

80.4

10-43-21 BOOKS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS

.00

.00

1,200.00

1,200.00

.0

10-43-23 TRAVEL

.00

.00

750.00

750.00

.0

10-43-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

.00

50.00

250.00

200.00

20.0

10-43-31 PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL

59.5

300.00

3,095.00

5,200.00

2,105.00

10-43-33 EDUCATION

.00

.00

1,300.00

1,300.00

.0

10-43-34 ACCOUNTING SERVICES/AUDIT

.00

12,500.00

15,900.00

3,400.00

78.6

3,062.74

37,555.65

60,500.00

22,944.35

62.1

TOTAL TREASURER

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 5

Page 48 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

ELECTIONS
10-50-24 OFFICE EXPENSE, SUPPLIES & POS

.00

.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

.0

10-50-62 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES

.00

19,160.95

39,350.00

20,189.05

48.7

TOTAL ELECTIONS

.00

19,160.95

40,350.00

21,189.05

47.5

GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
10-52-26 BUILDING SUPPLIES

473.18

3,759.66

7,000.00

3,240.34

53.7

2,725.89

11,084.59

25,000.00

13,915.41

44.3

.00

9,563.00

10,200.00

637.00

93.8

10-52-63 OTHER SERVICES

1,412.00

9,158.16

13,000.00

3,841.84

70.5

10-52-72 CAPITAL OUTLAY BUILDINGS

1,285.65

73,444.48

1,000,000.00

926,555.52

7.3

5,896.72

107,009.89

1,055,200.00

948,190.11

10.1

10-57-61 POLICE-PROFESSIONAL SERVICE

126,929.16

888,504.12

1,523,150.00

634,645.88

58.3

10-57-63 FIRE-PROFESSIONAL SERVICE

127,441.16

892,088.12

1,529,294.00

637,205.88

58.3

10-57-72 ADMINISTRATION

10,088.08

70,616.56

121,057.00

50,440.44

58.3

10-57-74 CAPITAL OUTLAY - EQUIPMENT

.00

.00

15,000.00

15,000.00

.0

TOTAL EMERGENCY SERVICES

264,458.40

1,851,208.80

3,188,501.00

1,337,292.20

58.1

4,112.30

30,891.88

53,500.00

22,608.12

57.7

1,934.51

13,930.36

20,100.00

6,169.64

69.3

10-58-14 OVERTIME WAGES

.00

.00

500.00

500.00

.0

10-58-21 BOOKS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS

.00

.00

500.00

500.00

.0

10-58-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

.00

.00

800.00

800.00

.0

30.00

225.00

1,000.00

775.00

22.5

10-52-27 UTILITIES
10-52-51 INSURANCE

TOTAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS

EMERGENCY SERVICES

BUILDING INSPECTION
10-58-11

SALARIES & WAGES

10-58-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

10-58-28 TELEPHONE
10-58-29 CONTRACT/BUILDING INSPECTOR

7,812.00

42,364.00

90,000.00

47,636.00

47.1

10-58-51 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS

.00

9,563.00

10,200.00

637.00

93.8

10-58-65 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE

.00

1,006.23

3,000.00

1,993.77

33.5

13,888.81

97,980.47

179,600.00

81,619.53

54.6

TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTION

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 6

Page 49 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

PLANNING & ZONING
10-59-11

SALARIES & WAGES

10-59-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
10-59-14 OVERTIME WAGES

13,619.66

105,932.34

181,900.00

75,967.66

6,391.63

46,553.05

75,400.00

28,846.95

61.7

413.01

1,743.83

1,000.00

743.83)

174.4

(

58.2

10-59-21 BOOKS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS

.00

.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

.0

10-59-23 TRAVEL

.00

278.87

1,500.00

1,221.13

18.6

10-59-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

.00

.00

1,500.00

1,500.00

.0

10-59-30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

2,418.75

34,815.17

60,000.00

25,184.83

58.0

10-59-31 LEGAL SERVICES FOR SUBDIVIS

1,100.00

1,100.00

20,000.00

18,900.00

5.5

.00

.00

750.00

750.00

.0

23,943.05

190,423.26

343,050.00

152,626.74

55.5

10,027.57

77,170.76

132,400.00

55,229.24

58.3

6,756.47

50,364.83

80,100.00

29,735.17

62.9

10-60-14 OVERTIME WAGES

205.23

7,295.25

8,000.00

704.75

91.2

10-60-15 ON CALL WAGES

553.44

3,851.45

6,350.00

2,498.55

60.7

.00

.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

.0

569.56

608.57

700.00

91.43

86.9

10-60-25 EQUIPMENT-SUPPLIES & MAINTENAN

5,571.61

39,812.79

75,000.00

35,187.21

53.1

10-60-26 STREET SUPPLIES AND MAINTENANC

2,462.49

30,819.45

75,000.00

44,180.55

41.1

.00

32.96

500.00

467.04

6.6

240.70

1,496.70

3,200.00

1,703.30

46.8

10-60-29 POWER - STREET LIGHTS

.00

24,363.30

50,000.00

25,636.70

48.7

10-60-51 INSURANCE

.00

9,563.00

10,200.00

637.00

93.8

10-60-63 OTHER SERVICES

.00

450.00

12,000.00

11,550.00

3.8

10-60-64 OTHER EXPENSES

1,793.53

3,336.53

6,500.00

3,163.47

51.3

10-59-34 EDUCATION
TOTAL PLANNING & ZONING

STREETS
10-60-11

SALARIES & WAGES

10-60-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

10-60-23 TRAVEL
10-60-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

10-60-27 UTILITIES
10-60-28 TELEPHONE

10-60-70 CLASS C ROAD FUND

.00

6,300.00

.00

(

6,300.00)

.0

10-60-73 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER THAN BUIL

.00

747,856.77

177,000.00

(

570,856.77)

422.5

10-60-74 CAPITAL OUTLAY - EQUIPMENT

.00

1,625.00

65,125.00

63,500.00

2.5

28,180.60

1,004,947.36

703,075.00

301,872.36)

142.9

TOTAL STREETS

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 7

Page 50 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

PARKS & RECREATION
10-70-11

SALARIES & WAGES

4,588.34

35,465.06

62,900.00

27,434.94

56.4

.00

40,438.75

63,500.00

23,061.25

63.7

2,897.70

25,071.85

40,100.00

15,028.15

62.5

10-70-14 OVERTIME WAGES

.00

1,989.05

2,500.00

510.95

79.6

10-70-23 TRAVEL

.00

.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

.0

187.75

2,081.28

2,400.00

318.72

86.7

10-70-25 EQUIPMENT-SUPPLIES & MAINTENAN

6,584.24

12,444.49

25,000.00

12,555.51

49.8

10-70-26 BUILDING AND GROUNDS SUPPLIES

692.46

35,595.03

55,000.00

19,404.97

64.7

4,399.55

34,468.02

60,000.00

25,531.98

57.5

220.70

1,346.70

3,000.00

1,653.30

44.9

10-70-51 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS

.00

9,563.00

10,200.00

637.00

93.8

10-70-60 RODEO

.00

47,986.65

35,000.00

12,986.65)

137.1

10-70-63 OTHER SERVICES-AM FORK AGREEMT

.00

.00

78,500.00

78,500.00

.0

10-70-64 OTHER EXPENSES

.00

4,390.30

.00

(

4,390.30)

.0

10-70-65 ALPINE DAYS

.00

141,761.86

115,000.00

(

26,761.86)

123.3

(

10-70-12 WAGES TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES
10-70-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

10-70-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

10-70-27 UTILITIES
10-70-28 TELEPHONE

10-70-66 OTHER EXPENSE - SPECIAL PROJEC
10-70-67 MOYLE PARK
10-70-68 LIBRARY

(

.00

150.00

.00

150.00)

.0

151.94

3,659.02

9,000.00

5,340.98

40.7
47.9

1,130.00

6,940.00

14,500.00

7,560.00

10-70-69 YOUTH COUNCIL

.00

6,027.07

8,500.00

2,472.93

70.9

10-70-70 BOOK MOBILE

.00

13,596.00

13,596.00

.00

100.0

10-70-71 TRAILS

.00

4,005.82

5,000.00

994.18

80.1

20,852.68

426,979.95

604,696.00

177,716.05

70.6

4,587.66

35,463.68

62,900.00

27,436.32

56.4

.00

40,438.67

63,500.00

23,061.33

63.7

2,906.60

25,139.11

40,100.00

14,960.89

62.7

10-77-14 OVERTIME WAGES

.00

1,989.05

2,500.00

510.95

79.6

10-77-23 TRAVEL

.00

17.50

500.00

482.50

3.5

10-77-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

.00

.00

250.00

250.00

.0

212.48

2,231.53

12,000.00

9,768.47

18.6

9,091.25

24.2

TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION

CEMETERY
10-77-11

SALARIES & WAGES

10-77-12 WAGES TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE
10-77-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

10-77-25 EQUIPMENT-SUPPLIES & MAINTENAN
10-77-26 BUILDING AND GROUNDS

.00

2,908.75

12,000.00

10-77-27 CEMETERY PAVING

446.56

3,125.92

.00

10-77-28 TELEPHONE

15.00

112.50

850.00

10-77-51 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS

.00

9,563.00

10-77-63 OTHER SERVICES

.00

60.51

TOTAL CEMETERY

8,168.30

121,050.22

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

3,125.92)

.0

737.50

13.2

10,200.00

637.00

93.8

10,000.00

9,939.49

.6

214,800.00

93,749.78

56.4

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 8

Page 51 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

GARBAGE
10-82-11

SALARIES & WAGES

4,055.15

29,498.90

54,100.00

24,601.10

54.5

2,047.34

13,523.07

25,000.00

11,476.93

54.1

10-82-14 OVERTIME WAGES

106.74

1,172.63

1,500.00

327.37

78.2

10-82-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

523.53

3,637.08

3,600.00

37.08)

101.0

10-82-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

(

10-82-28 TELEPHONE

10.84

66.27

250.00

183.73

26.5

10-82-31 PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL

300.00

3,000.00

4,800.00

1,800.00

62.5

10-82-34 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE

456.71

3,237.99

5,500.00

2,262.01

58.9

10-82-61 TIPPING FEES

13,454.27

87,518.30

166,000.00

78,481.70

52.7

10-82-62 WASTE PICKUP CONTRACT

40,602.35

243,233.54

482,000.00

238,766.46

50.5

140.47

842.82

15,800.00

14,957.18

5.3

.00

12,032.73

.00

12,032.73)

.0

61,697.40

397,763.33

758,550.00

360,786.67

52.4

1,364.57

5,377.63

20,000.00

14,622.37

26.9

.00

.00

34,666.00

34,666.00

.0

35.00

1,405.89

5,000.00

3,594.11

28.1

1,399.57

6,783.52

59,666.00

52,882.48

11.4

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

491,758.20

4,597,545.98

7,865,188.00

3,267,642.02

58.5

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

468,344.75

1,860,409.43

.00

1,860,409.43)

.0

10-82-64 OTHER EXPENSES
10-82-65 CITY CLEANUP PROJECTS
TOTAL GARBAGE

(

MISCELLANEOUS
10-99-25 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE
10-99-80 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL IMP FUND
10-99-82 EMERGENCY PREP
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 9

Page 52 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
CLASS C ROADS
ASSETS
11-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

807,511.72

TOTAL ASSETS

807,511.72

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
11-2980

BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

1,307,037.46

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

(

499,525.74)

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

807,511.72

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

807,511.72

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

807,511.72

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 10

Page 53 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
CLASS C ROADS
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

11-33-56

B&C ROAD FUND ALLOTMENT

.00

226,009.62

525,000.00

298,990.38

43.1

11-33-60

MASS TRANSIT

21,404.50

88,620.71

195,000.00

106,379.29

45.5

11-33-80

PUBLIC TRANSIT TAX

10,883.36

44,739.44

80,000.00

35,260.56

55.9

TOTAL SOURCE 33

32,287.86

359,369.77

800,000.00

440,630.23

44.9

INTEREST EARNINGS

.00

20,106.40

45,000.00

24,893.60

44.7

TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

.00

20,106.40

45,000.00

24,893.60

44.7

FUND BALANCE APPOPRIATION

.00

.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

.0

32,287.86

379,476.17

850,000.00

470,523.83

44.6

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
11-38-10

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
11-39-10

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 11

Page 54 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
CLASS C ROADS
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

11-60-70

CLASS C ROAD FUND PROJECTS

.00

554,001.91

525,000.00

29,001.91)

105.5

11-60-75

MASS TRANSIT PROJECTS

.00

195,000.00

195,000.00

.00

100.0

11-60-80

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

.00

80,000.00

80,000.00

.00

100.0

11-60-90

RESERVES

.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

.00

100.0

TOTAL DEPARTMENT 60

.00

879,001.91

850,000.00

(

29,001.91)

103.4

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

879,001.91

850,000.00

(

29,001.91)

103.4

499,525.74)

.00

499,525.74

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

32,287.86

(

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

PCNT

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 12

Page 55 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
RECREATION IMPACT FEES
ASSETS
15-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

462,299.50

TOTAL ASSETS

462,299.50

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY
15-2831 RESERVE-IMP RECREATION

571,085.62

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
15-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

(

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

123,878.26)
15,092.14
(

108,786.12)

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

462,299.50

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

462,299.50

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 13

Page 56 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
RECREATION IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
15-37-31 RECREATION FACILITY FEES

.00

5,376.00

100,000.00

94,624.00

5.4

.00

5,376.00

100,000.00

94,624.00

5.4

.00

9,716.14

40,000.00

30,283.86

24.3

.00

9,716.14

40,000.00

30,283.86

24.3

.00

.00

145,000.00

145,000.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

145,000.00

145,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

.00

15,092.14

285,000.00

269,907.86

5.3

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
15-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
15-39-10 FUND BALANCE APPROPRIATION

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:58AM

PAGE: 14

Page 57 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
RECREATION IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
15-40-31 PARK SYSTEM

.00

.00

285,000.00

285,000.00

.0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

.00

.00

285,000.00

285,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

.00

285,000.00

285,000.00

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

.00

15,092.14

.00

15,092.14)

.0

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 15

Page 58 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
STREET IMPACT FEES
ASSETS
16-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

169,463.32

TOTAL ASSETS

169,463.32

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
16-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

163,536.55

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

5,926.77

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

169,463.32

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

169,463.32

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

169,463.32

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 16

Page 59 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
STREET IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
16-37-21 STREETS & TRANSPORTATION FEES

.00

2,366.64

40,000.00

37,633.36

5.9

.00

2,366.64

40,000.00

37,633.36

5.9

.00

3,560.13

25,000.00

21,439.87

14.2

.00

3,560.13

25,000.00

21,439.87

14.2

.00

.00

340,000.00

340,000.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

340,000.00

340,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

.00

5,926.77

405,000.00

399,073.23

1.5

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
16-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
16-39-10 FUND BALANCE APPROPRIATION

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 17

Page 60 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
STREET IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
16-40-21 STREET & TRANSPORT EXPENSES

.00

.00

405,000.00

405,000.00

.0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

.00

.00

405,000.00

405,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

.00

405,000.00

405,000.00

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

.00

5,926.77

.00

5,926.77)

.0

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 18

Page 61 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
PARC FUND
ASSETS
44-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

119,484.09

TOTAL ASSETS

119,484.09

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
44-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

103,446.90

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

16,037.19

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

119,484.09

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

119,484.09

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

119,484.09

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 19

Page 62 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
PARC FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

44-38-10 INTEREST REVENUE

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

.00

2,377.57

.00

2,377.57)

.0

14,965.66

52,962.28

100,000.00

47,037.72

53.0

TOTAL SOURCE 38

14,965.66

55,339.85

100,000.00

44,660.15

55.3

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

14,965.66

55,339.85

100,000.00

44,660.15

55.3

44-38-20 PARC TAX

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

PCNT

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 20

Page 63 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
PARC FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

44-40-72 CAPITAL OUTLAY - OTHER

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

3,704.93

39,302.66

100,000.00

60,697.34

39.3

TOTAL DEPARTMENT 40

3,704.93

39,302.66

100,000.00

60,697.34

39.3

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

3,704.93

39,302.66

100,000.00

60,697.34

39.3

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

11,260.73

16,037.19

.00

16,037.19)

.0

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 21

Page 64 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
ASSETS
45-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

10,207,548.58

TOTAL ASSETS

10,207,548.58

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES
45-2124 OTHER BONDS

351,000.00

45-2140 INFRA PROTECTION BONDS

1,498,688.48

45-2147 OPEN SPACE BOND

139,000.00

45-2150 RESTRICTED FOR ROADS

167,349.00

45-2152 MOYLE PARK DONATIONS

5,212.00

45-2156 MUSTARD DONATION/LAM PK TRAILS

4,948.00

45-2157 MOYLE PARK DONATIONS-COOPER

50,000.00

TOTAL LIABILITIES

2,216,197.48

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
45-2960 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT

174,329.36

45-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

7,747,834.52

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

69,187.22

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

7,991,351.10

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

7,991,351.10

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

10,207,548.58

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 22

Page 65 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
45-38-10 INTEREST REVENUE

.00

216,751.17

400,000.00

183,248.83

54.2

.00

216,751.17

400,000.00

183,248.83

54.2

45-39-10 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND

.00

.00

37,296.00

37,296.00

.0

45-39-11

CAPITOL IMPROVEMENTS FUND SURP

.00

.00

2,792,704.00

2,792,704.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

2,830,000.00

2,830,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

.00

216,751.17

3,230,000.00

3,013,248.83

6.7

TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 23

Page 66 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
45-40-72 CAPITAL OUTLAY - OTHER

115,552.31

147,563.95

962,000.00

814,436.05

15.3

45-40-73 CAPITAL OUTLAY BUILDINGS

.00

.00

2,200,000.00

2,200,000.00

.0

45-40-74 CAPITAL OUTLAY - EQUIPMENT

.00

.00

68,000.00

68,000.00

.0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

115,552.31

147,563.95

3,230,000.00

3,082,436.05

4.6

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

115,552.31

147,563.95

3,230,000.00

3,082,436.05

4.6

115,552.31)

69,187.22

.00

69,187.22)

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

(

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 24

Page 67 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
WATER FUND
ASSETS
51-1110

CASH ON HAND

51-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

51-1311

WATER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

(

126.43)
3,968,295.91
75,697.68

51-1314 ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNT

(

51-1598 INVESTMENT IN WATER STOCK

390.78)
73,400.00

51-1610 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS-PENSIONS

57,509.00

51-1611

219,000.00

LAND

51-1621 BUILDING

169,102.63

51-1622 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION-BUI

(

51-1631 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI

142,115.39)
17,062,308.58

51-1632 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION-IMP

(

51-1651 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

6,958,669.14)
1,274,518.67

51-1652 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPR'N-MACH & EQ

(

745,531.44)

TOTAL ASSETS

15,052,999.29

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES
51-2151 UTILITY DEPOSIT

27,700.00

51-2220 WAGES PAYABLE

5,214.64

51-2230 ST COMPENSATED ABSENCES

24,432.82

51-2290 NET PENSION LIABILITY

42,961.00

51-2410 DEFERRED INFLOWS-PENSIONS

193.00

51-2530 LT COMPENSATED ABSENCES

2,154.10

TOTAL LIABILITIES

102,655.56

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
51-2970 CONTRA ACCOUNT 81 IMPACT FEES

297,053.91

51-2980 BEGINNING OF YEAR

14,477,403.29

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

175,886.53

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

14,950,343.73

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

14,950,343.73

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

15,052,999.29

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 25

Page 68 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
51-37-11

METERED WATER SALES

66,720.85

555,583.13

875,000.00

319,416.87

63.5

51-37-12 OTHER WATER REVENUE

365.00

5,607.05

20,000.00

14,392.95

28.0

51-37-16 WATER CONNECTION FEE

460.00

8,280.00

30,000.00

21,720.00

27.6

51-37-17 PENALTIES

657.08

5,085.24

5,700.00

614.76

89.2

68,202.93

574,555.42

930,700.00

356,144.58

61.7

.00

82,241.61

180,000.00

97,758.39

45.7

.00

82,241.61

180,000.00

97,758.39

45.7

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND EQUITY

.00

.00

542,725.00

542,725.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

542,725.00

542,725.00

.0

68,202.93

656,797.03

1,653,425.00

996,627.97

39.7

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
51-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
51-39-11

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 26

Page 69 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

WATER EXPENDITURES
51-80-11

SALARIES & WAGES

14,340.42

112,978.59

189,300.00

76,321.41

59.7

8,806.21

66,834.21

104,700.00

37,865.79

63.8

51-80-14 OVERTIME WAGES

311.97

8,467.88

9,000.00

532.12

94.1

51-80-15 ON CALL WAGES

553.44

3,851.45

7,600.00

3,748.55

50.7

51-80-21 BOOKS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS

936.00

936.00

2,500.00

1,564.00

37.4

.00

27.30

3,000.00

2,972.70

.9

51-80-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POS

4,713.11

22,280.13

20,000.00

2,280.13)

111.4

51-80-25 EQUIPMENT-SUPPLIES & MAINTENAN

2,655.55

8,661.75

21,000.00

12,338.25

41.3

51-80-26 BUILDING AND GROUNDS SUPPLIES

382.79

57,518.19

50,000.00

(

7,518.19)

115.0

51-80-27 UTILITIES

543.58

58,182.81

35,000.00

(

23,182.81)

166.2

51-80-28 TELEPHONE

318.28

1,987.65

2,500.00

512.35

79.5

51-80-31 PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL SERVI

450.00

4,500.00

25,000.00

20,500.00

18.0

.00

430.00

1,000.00

570.00

43.0

1,230.21

4,028.27

10,000.00

5,971.73

40.3

51-80-35 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE

.00

.00

255,000.00

255,000.00

.0

51-80-51 INSURANCE AND SURETY BONDS

.00

9,563.00

10,200.00

637.00

93.8

51-80-62 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES

1,990.00

32,537.69

38,000.00

5,462.31

85.6

51-80-63 OTHER EXPENSES

4,111.74

33,099.97

35,000.00

1,900.03

94.6

51-80-72 CAPITAL OUTLAY - BUILDINGS

.00

.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

.0

51-80-73 CAPITOL OUTLAY - IMPROVEMENTS

.00

53,400.61

764,500.00

711,099.39

7.0

51-80-74 CAPITAL OUTLAY - EQUIPMENT

.00

1,625.00

65,125.00

63,500.00

2.5

TOTAL WATER EXPENDITURES

41,343.30

480,910.50

1,653,425.00

1,172,514.50

29.1

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

41,343.30

480,910.50

1,653,425.00

1,172,514.50

29.1

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

26,859.63

175,886.53

.00

175,886.53)

.0

51-80-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

51-80-23 TRAVEL

51-80-33 EDUCATION
51-80-34 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 27

Page 70 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
SEWER FUND
ASSETS
52-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

3,419,068.92

52-1312 SEWER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

94,235.80

52-1314 ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNT

(

300.00)

52-1610 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS-PENSIONS

54,126.00

52-1611

21,072.00

LAND

52-1621 BUILDING

45,971.00

52-1622 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION-BUI

(

45,971.00)

(

3,764,808.90)

(

308,535.08)

52-1631 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI

8,661,627.16

52-1632 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION-IMP
52-1651 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

480,281.76

52-1652 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPR'N-MACH & EQ
TOTAL ASSETS

8,656,767.66

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES
52-2220 WAGES PAYABLE

5,214.64

52-2230 ST COMPENSATED ABSENCES

24,431.76

52-2290 NET PENSION LIABILITY

40,433.00

52-2300 TSSD CLEARING ACCOUNT

145,547.90

52-2410 DEFERRED INFLOWS-PENSIONS

181.00

52-2530 LT COMPENSATED ABSENCES

2,154.10

TOTAL LIABILITIES

217,962.40

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
52-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

8,260,172.51

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

178,632.75

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

8,438,805.26

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

8,438,805.26

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

8,656,767.66

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 28

Page 71 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
SEWER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
52-37-11

SEWER SYSTEM USAGE SALES

117,620.59

821,691.67

1,300,000.00

478,308.33

.00

.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

.0

125.00

2,125.00

5,000.00

2,875.00

42.5

117,745.59

823,816.67

1,315,000.00

491,183.33

62.7

.00

71,423.11

160,000.00

88,576.89

44.6

.00

71,423.11

160,000.00

88,576.89

44.6

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND EQUITY

.00

.00

369,275.00

369,275.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

369,275.00

369,275.00

.0

117,745.59

895,239.78

1,844,275.00

949,035.22

48.5

52-37-12 OTHER REVENUE
52-37-16 SEWER CONNECTION FEE
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

63.2

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
52-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
52-39-11

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 29

Page 72 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
SEWER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

SEWER EXPENDITURES
52-81-11

SALARIES & WAGES

14,340.41

115,940.51

189,300.00

73,359.49

61.3

8,806.14

63,871.54

104,700.00

40,828.46

61.0

52-81-14 OVERTIME WAGES

311.97

8,467.88

9,000.00

532.12

94.1

52-81-15 ON CALL WAGES

553.44

3,851.45

7,600.00

3,748.55

50.7

.00

568.00

2,750.00

2,182.00

20.7

523.52

12,846.78

18,000.00

5,153.22

71.4

.00

.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

.0

405.43

4,186.61

12,000.00

7,813.39

34.9

52-81-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

52-81-23 TRAVEL
52-81-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE
52-81-25 EQUIPMENT-SUPPLIES & MAINTENAN
52-81-26 BUILDING AND GROUND SUPPLIES
52-81-27 UTILITIES

.00

160.54

2,200.00

2,039.46

7.3

52-81-28 TELEPHONE

277.70

1,745.97

3,900.00

2,154.03

44.8

52-81-31 PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL

300.00

3,075.00

8,000.00

4,925.00

38.4

52-81-34 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE

751.21

3,549.27

7,000.00

3,450.73

50.7

52-81-35 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE

.00

.00

130,000.00

130,000.00

.0

52-81-51 INSURANCE AND SURETY BONDS

.00

9,563.00

10,200.00

637.00

93.8

52-81-62 TIMPANOGOS SPECIAL SERVICE DIS

78,654.55

414,442.85

900,000.00

485,557.15

46.1

52-81-64 OTHER EXPENSES

1,977.16

18,643.27

34,500.00

15,856.73

54.0

52-81-73 CAPITAL OUTLAY-IMPROVEMENTS

.00

54,069.36

330,000.00

275,930.64

16.4

52-81-74 CAPITAL OUTLAY - EQUIPMENT

.00

1,625.00

65,125.00

63,500.00

2.5

TOTAL SEWER EXPENDITURES

106,901.53

716,607.03

1,844,275.00

1,127,667.97

38.9

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

106,901.53

716,607.03

1,844,275.00

1,127,667.97

38.9

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

10,844.06

178,632.75

.00

178,632.75)

.0

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 30

Page 73 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION FUND
ASSETS
55-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

1,785,033.77

55-1282 2020 BOND FUND 0352420
55-1311

848.88

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

81,286.67

55-1314 ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNT

(

55-1610 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS-PENSIONS

125.70)
37,212.00

55-1631 PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM

16,389,423.30

55-1632 ACCUMLATION DEPRECIATION-IMPR

(

55-1633 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS

5,463,996.88)
.70

55-1651 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

389,320.31

55-1652 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPR'N-MACH & EQ

(

55-1910 DEFERED AMOUNT ON REFUNDING

297,622.64)
26,617.02

TOTAL ASSETS

12,947,997.43

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES
55-2141 ACCRUED INTEREST PAYABLE

3,040.71

55-2220 WAGES PAYABLE

4,585.28

55-2230 ST COMPENSATED ABSENCES

20,399.95

55-2290 NET PENSION LIABILITY

27,798.00

55-2410 DEFERRED INFLOWS-PENSIONS
55-2511

125.00

CURRENT PORTION OF BONDS

356,000.00

55-2532 BOND - 2020 WATER REFUNDING

1,473,000.00

55-2540 LT COMPENSATED ABSENCES

2,154.10

TOTAL LIABILITIES

1,887,103.04

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
55-2970 CONTRA ACCOUNT IMPACT FEES 85

282,500.00

55-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

10,585,808.28

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

192,586.11

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

11,060,894.39

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

11,060,894.39

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

12,947,997.43

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 31

Page 74 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
55-33-20 PI IRRIGATION GRANT PROJECT

.00

900,000.00

.00

(

900,000.00)

.0

.00

900,000.00

.00

(

900,000.00)

.0

78,787.87

810,628.85

1,150,000.00

339,371.15

70.5

.00

742.22

1,000.00

257.78

74.2

3,824.04

27,240.67

40,000.00

12,759.33

68.1

82,611.91

838,611.74

1,191,000.00

352,388.26

70.4

2.79

51,126.57

60,000.00

8,873.43

85.2

2.79

51,126.57

60,000.00

8,873.43

85.2

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND EQUITY

.00

.00

1,381,329.00

1,381,329.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

1,381,329.00

1,381,329.00

.0

82,614.70

1,789,738.31

2,632,329.00

842,590.69

68.0

TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE

OPERATING REVENUES
55-37-11

IRRIGATION WATER SALES

55-37-12 OTHER REVENUE
55-37-16 PRESSURIZED CONNECTION FEE
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
55-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
55-39-11

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 32

Page 75 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
55-40-11

SALARIES & WAGES, ADMINISTRATI

12,381.20

95,995.94

163,200.00

67,204.06

58.8

7,731.47

58,011.87

91,700.00

33,688.13

63.3

55-40-14 OVERTIME WAGES

311.99

8,467.88

9,000.00

532.12

94.1

55-40-15 ON CALL WAGES

553.44

3,851.38

5,000.00

1,148.62

77.0

.00

.00

1,200.00

1,200.00

.0

55-40-25 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLIES & MAINTEN

2,655.54

12,971.42

58,000.00

45,028.58

22.4

55-40-26 BUILDING & GROUNDS SUPPLIES

314.51

7,616.53

25,000.00

17,383.47

30.5

55-40-27 UTILITIES

192.01

138,312.62

185,000.00

46,687.38

74.8

55-40-28 TELEPHONE

276.91

1,740.49

3,500.00

1,759.51

49.7

55-40-29 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

711.27

10,182.90

12,000.00

1,817.10

84.9

55-40-31 PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL SERVI

150.00

1,500.00

5,000.00

3,500.00

30.0

.00

47,441.55

10,000.00

(

37,441.55)

474.4

55-40-33 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE

291.75

1,511.75

7,500.00

5,988.25

20.2

55-40-34 ANNUAL AUDIT - UTAH WATER

459.46

3,257.52

.00

(

3,257.52)

.0

55-40-35 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE

.00

.00

223,704.00

223,704.00

.0

55-40-51 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS

.00

9,648.00

11,200.00

1,552.00

86.1

55-40-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

55-40-23 TRAVEL

55-40-32 ENGINEER SERVICES

55-40-62 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
55-40-63 OTHER EXPENSES
55-40-71 CUP WATER
55-40-73 CAPITAL OUTLAY
55-40-74 CAPITAL OUTLAY - EQUIPMENT

.00

16,558.70

33,000.00

16,441.30

50.2

5,400.94

22,370.80

23,000.00

629.20

97.3

.00

.00

184,000.00

184,000.00

.0

26,966.25

896,509.50

1,267,500.00

370,990.50

70.7

602.92

2,227.92

35,125.00

32,897.08

6.3

55-40-75 IRRIGATION METER REPLACEMENT

.00

812.58

.00

(

812.58)

.0

55-40-80 TRUSTEE FEES

.00

1,500.00

.00

(

1,500.00)

.0

55-40-83 BOND PRINCIPAL #8938222

.00

244,500.00

278,700.00

34,200.00

87.7

55-40-84 BOND INTEREST #8938222

.00

12,162.85

.00

12,162.85)

.0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

58,999.66

1,597,152.20

2,632,329.00

1,035,176.80

60.7

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

58,999.66

1,597,152.20

2,632,329.00

1,035,176.80

60.7

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

23,615.04

192,586.11

.00

192,586.11)

.0

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 33

Page 76 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
STORM DRAIN FUND
ASSETS
56-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

784,558.53

56-1313 STORM DRAIN ACCTS RECEIVABLE

16,955.41

56-1314 ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNT

(

56-1610 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS-PENSIONS
56-1611

267.63)
16,915.00

LAND

216,055.23

56-1631 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS

7,608,247.36

56-1632 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION

(

2,232,306.32)

TOTAL ASSETS

6,410,157.58

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES
56-2220 WAGES PAYABLE

1,439.58

56-2230 ST COMPENSATED ABSENCES

16,340.35

56-2290 NET PENSION LIABILITY

12,635.00

56-2410 DEFERRED INFLOWS-PENSIONS

57.00

56-2530 LT COMPENSATED ABSENCES

1,352.00

TOTAL LIABILITIES

31,823.93

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
56-2920 CONTRA IMPACT FEE

195,975.13

56-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

6,438,685.62

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

(

256,327.10)

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

6,378,333.65

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

6,378,333.65

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

6,410,157.58

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 34

Page 77 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
STORM DRAIN FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
56-37-11

STORM DRAIN REVENUE

56-37-12 OTHER REVENUE
56-37-13 SWPP FEE
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

16,097.54

112,533.62

200,000.00

87,466.38

.00

.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

56.3
.0

300.00

3,900.00

14,000.00

10,100.00

27.9

16,397.54

116,433.62

215,000.00

98,566.38

54.2

.00

22,417.87

47,000.00

24,582.13

47.7

.00

22,417.87

47,000.00

24,582.13

47.7

.00

.00

162,150.00

162,150.00

.0

.00

.00

162,150.00

162,150.00

.0

16,397.54

138,851.49

424,150.00

285,298.51

32.7

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
56-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

SOURCE 39
56-39-12 UNAPPROPRIATED FUND EQUITY
TOTAL SOURCE 39

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 35

Page 78 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
STORM DRAIN FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
56-40-11

SALARIES & WAGES, ADMINISTRATI

4,905.11

38,556.69

64,600.00

26,043.31

59.7

3,262.42

23,988.83

39,200.00

15,211.17

61.2

56-40-14 OVERTIME WAGES

.00

.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

.0

56-40-20 PLANNING

.00

.00

500.00

500.00

.0

200.00

3,500.00

4,000.00

500.00

87.5

56-40-23 TRAVEL

.00

.00

650.00

650.00

.0

56-40-24 OFFICE SUPPLIES & POSTAGE

.00

.00

500.00

500.00

.0

299.61

299.61

4,500.00

4,200.39

6.7

56-40-13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

56-40-21 BOOKS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERS

56-40-26 BUILDING & GROUND SUPPLIES
56-40-27 STORM DRAIN UTILITIES

45.27

316.89

.00

316.89)

.0

56-40-34 TECHNOLOGY UPDATE

748.46

3,529.76

5,500.00

(

1,970.24

64.2

56-40-35 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE

.00

.00

83,500.00

83,500.00

.0

56-40-51 INSURANCE

.00

9,562.82

10,200.00

637.18

93.8

56-40-62 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES

2,072.75

4,092.76

10,000.00

.00

311,331.23

200,000.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

11,533.62

395,178.59

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

11,533.62

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

4,863.92

56-40-73 CAPITAL OUTLAY

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

(

5,907.24

40.9

111,331.23)

155.7

424,150.00

28,971.41

93.2

395,178.59

424,150.00

28,971.41

93.2

256,327.10)

.00

256,327.10

.0

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 36

Page 79 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
ASSETS
70-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

813,750.44

TOTAL ASSETS

813,750.44

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 37

Page 80 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
LIABILITIES
70-2300 BOND FOR BECK PINES PLAT A

4,167.30

70-2301 CHERRYPOINT ROAD PRESERVATION

14,513.70

70-2302 BOND FOR BECK PINES PLAT C

3,715.54

70-2303 DRAINAGE BOND MCFADDEN

20,000.00

70-2304 LEGACY HEIGHTS PLAT A

7,557.88

70-2307 BASEBALL FIELD #4

46,990.00

70-2308 BLANK UTILITIES BOND

1,600.00

70-2310 BOND FOR HERITAGE HILLS

10,800.00

70-2311

13,067.20

ESCROW BOND BATEMAN LANE

70-2332 BROOKSIDE CT 3 FALLS SEALCOAT

3,000.00

70-2333 RIDGE@ALPINE PHASE 5 SEALCOAT

22,860.75

70-2334 LAYTON SUBDIVISION SEALCOAT

7,400.00

70-2338 REGAN PACK SIDEWALK BOND

2,852.00

70-2345 ALPINE RIDGE PHASE 5 OAK VIEW

3,323.20

70-2346 FORT CREEK MANOR PLAT A

7,014.30

70-2347 THREE FALLS FLOCK CAMERAS

5,700.00

70-2373 ALPINE VIEW ESTATES

3,509.00

70-2384 JECCO FARM ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

1,611.00

70-2401 20-BROOKSIDE MEADOWS ROAD FUND

13,275.00

70-2422 CASH BOND TERRY PEARCE SITE

1,007.20

70-2425 ESCROW BOND 1095 E WATKINS LN

880.00

70-2430 ESCROW RIDGE DRIVE SIDEWALK

1,323.00

70-2432 ESCROW 648 N PATTERSON LN C&G

2,400.00

70-2445 CASH BOND FOR NORTH GROVE DR

11,866.20

70-2446 BOND FOR BURGESS PL SIDEWALK

400.00

70-2449 RED DEER CONSTRUCTION

6,312.00

70-2450 PERRY/APPLE CREEK ACRES

84.00

70-2451 ALPINE ACRES PLAT C C&G

2,240.00

70-2453 CARL PACK STREET ESCROW

12,279.17

70-2454 JOANN PACK STREET ESCROW

12,198.38

70-2455 WAYNE PACK STREET ESCROW

12,198.38

70-2456 LORRAINE WALZ STREET ESCROW

13,727.00

70-2457 JONES SITE PLAN 253 N 200 E

547.00

70-2458 VINTAGE PLACE B

845.00

70-2462 20-MONTDELLA SUBDIVISION

175,800.34

70-2465 PEARCE (TERRY) PEARCE PLAT A

42,378.75

70-2470 22-SILVERHAWK BOND-GRENNY

5,000.00

70-2471 SUMMIT POINT RECLAM BOND

3,955.00

70-2538 WILLIS BECKSTEAD - WATER MAIN

280.61

70-2544 DON ROGERS - FORT CANYON

1,291.31

70-2545 DON ROGERS - FORT CANYON

12,918.62

70-2572 BOND FOR JAMES MOYLE

3,010.00

70-2579 BOND FOR RED PINE DRIVE

2,995.00

70-2585 VEIN TOWLE BARN BOND

24,033.15

70-2586 BOND FOR DAVID PEIRCE 600 S

904.00

70-2591 BOND FOR RIVER MEADOWS OFC PK

4,012.50

70-2599 BOND FOR 300 NORTH EXTENTION

10,586.00

TOTAL LIABILITIES

558,429.48

FUND EQUITY
70-2603 ELKRIDGE LUXURY ESTATES BOND

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

61,160.00

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 38

Page 81 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
70-2974 24-JACKSON HGT PLAT B SIDEWALK

7,600.00

70-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

169,371.64

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

17,189.32

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

194,160.96

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

255,320.96

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

813,750.44

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 39

Page 82 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
70-38-10 INTEREST REVENUE

.00

17,189.32

34,000.00

16,810.68

50.6

TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

.00

17,189.32

34,000.00

16,810.68

50.6

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

.00

17,189.32

34,000.00

16,810.68

50.6

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 40

Page 83 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
70-40-64 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES

.00

.00

34,000.00

34,000.00

.0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

.00

.00

34,000.00

34,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

.00

34,000.00

34,000.00

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

.00

17,189.32

.00

17,189.32)

.0

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 41

Page 84 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE FUND
ASSETS
71-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUN

1,871,352.19

TOTAL ASSETS

1,871,352.19

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
71-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

1,773,567.67

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

97,784.52

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

1,871,352.19

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

1,871,352.19

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

1,871,352.19

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 42

Page 85 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
71-33-56 CEMETERY LOT PAYMENTS
71-33-58 UPRIGHT MONUMENT
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE

8,925.00

67,575.00

20,000.00

150.00

1,575.00

2,500.00

9,075.00

69,150.00

22,500.00

.00

38,834.52

.00

(

47,575.00)

337.9

925.00

63.0

46,650.00)

307.3

45,000.00

6,165.48

86.3

38,834.52

45,000.00

6,165.48

86.3

.00

.00

102,500.00

102,500.00

.0

.00

.00

102,500.00

102,500.00

.0

9,075.00

107,984.52

170,000.00

62,015.48

63.5

(

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
71-38-10 INTEREST REVENUE
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
71-39-10 FUND SURPLUS
TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 43

Page 86 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
71-40-64 OTHER EXPENSES

.00

10,200.00

170,000.00

159,800.00

6.0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

.00

10,200.00

170,000.00

159,800.00

6.0

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

10,200.00

170,000.00

159,800.00

6.0

9,075.00

97,784.52

.00

97,784.52)

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 44

Page 87 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
WATER IMPACT FEES
ASSETS
81-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

834,550.38

TOTAL ASSETS

834,550.38

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
81-2970 CONTRA ACCOUNT IMPACT FEES 51

(

81-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

297,053.91)
1,053,746.69

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

77,857.60

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

834,550.38

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

834,550.38

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

834,550.38

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 45

Page 88 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
WATER IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
81-37-20 WATER IMPACT FEES
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

1,162.99

66,290.43

135,000.00

68,709.57

49.1

1,162.99

66,290.43

135,000.00

68,709.57

49.1

.00

17,304.34

35,000.00

17,695.66

49.4

.00

17,304.34

35,000.00

17,695.66

49.4

1,162.99

83,594.77

170,000.00

86,405.23

49.2

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
81-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 46

Page 89 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
WATER IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

IMPACT FEE PROJECTS
81-80-70 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPACT FEE

.00

5,737.17

170,000.00

164,262.83

3.4

TOTAL IMPACT FEE PROJECTS

.00

5,737.17

170,000.00

164,262.83

3.4

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

5,737.17

170,000.00

164,262.83

3.4

1,162.99

77,857.60

.00

77,857.60)

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 47

Page 90 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
SEWER IMPACT FEES
ASSETS
82-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

165,398.07

TOTAL ASSETS

165,398.07

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
82-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

167,430.41

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

(

2,032.34)

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

165,398.07

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

165,398.07

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

165,398.07

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 48

Page 91 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
SEWER IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
82-37-20 SEWER IMPACT FEES
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

362.52

4,712.76

25,000.00

20,287.24

18.9

362.52

4,712.76

25,000.00

20,287.24

18.9

.00

3,558.38

.00

(

3,558.38)

.0

.00

3,558.38

.00

(

3,558.38)

.0

362.52

8,271.14

25,000.00

16,728.86

33.1

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
82-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 49

Page 92 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
SEWER IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

IMPACT FEE PROJECTS
82-80-70 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPACT FEE

.00

10,303.48

25,000.00

14,696.52

41.2

TOTAL IMPACT FEE PROJECTS

.00

10,303.48

25,000.00

14,696.52

41.2

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

10,303.48

25,000.00

14,696.52

41.2

2,032.34)

.00

2,032.34

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

362.52

(

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 50

Page 93 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
PI IMPACT FEES
ASSETS
85-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

532,218.08

TOTAL ASSETS

532,218.08

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
85-2970 CONTRA ACCOUNT IMPACT FEES 55

(

85-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

282,500.00)
870,947.91

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

(

56,229.83)

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

532,218.08

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

532,218.08

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

532,218.08

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

07:59AM

PAGE: 51

Page 94 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
PI IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
85-37-20 PI IMPACT FEES
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

8,838.93

50,112.11

200,000.00

149,887.89

25.1

8,838.93

50,112.11

200,000.00

149,887.89

25.1

.00

11,948.99

27,500.00

15,551.01

43.5

.00

11,948.99

27,500.00

15,551.01

43.5

8,838.93

62,061.10

227,500.00

165,438.90

27.3

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
85-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

08:00AM

PAGE: 52

Page 95 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
PI IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

EXPENDITURES
85-40-45 PROJECTS

.00

6,790.93

116,000.00

109,209.07

5.9

85-40-86 BOND PI INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL

.00

111,500.00

111,500.00

.00

100.0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

.00

118,290.93

227,500.00

109,209.07

52.0

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

118,290.93

227,500.00

109,209.07

52.0

56,229.83)

.00

56,229.83

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

8,838.93

(

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

08:00AM

PAGE: 53

Page 96 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES
ASSETS
86-1190

CASH - ALLOCATION FROM GENERAL

225,997.22

TOTAL ASSETS

225,997.22

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
86-2920 CONTRA IMPACT FEE

(

86-2980 BALANCE BEGINNING OF YEAR

195,975.13)
417,892.99

REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD

4,079.36

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

225,997.22

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

225,997.22

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

225,997.22

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

08:00AM

PAGE: 54

Page 97 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEARNED

PCNT

OPERATING REVENUES
86-37-20 STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES

.00

1,600.00

25,000.00

23,400.00

6.4

.00

1,600.00

25,000.00

23,400.00

6.4

.00

2,479.36

11,000.00

8,520.64

22.5

.00

2,479.36

11,000.00

8,520.64

22.5

.00

.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

.0

TOTAL TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

.00

.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND REVENUE

.00

4,079.36

50,000.00

45,920.64

8.2

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES

INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE
86-38-10 INTEREST EARNINGS
TOTAL INTEREST AND MISC REVENUE

TRANSFERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
86-39-10 FUND BALANCE APPROPRIATION

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

08:00AM

PAGE: 55

Page 98 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JANUARY 31, 2026
STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES
PERIOD ACTUAL

YTD ACTUAL

BUDGET

UNEXPENDED

PCNT

IMPACT FEE PROJECTS
86-80-70 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPACT FEE

.00

.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

.0

TOTAL IMPACT FEE PROJECTS

.00

.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

.0

TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES

.00

.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

.0

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES

.00

4,079.36

.00

4,079.36)

.0

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

(

02/04/2026

08:00AM

PAGE: 56

Page 99 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
FUND 91
ASSETS
91-1611

LAND

22,972,643.75

91-1621 BUILDINGS

2,667,722.67

91-1622 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION-BUI

(

91-1631 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI

73,300.48)
45,747,264.23

91-1632 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPR'N-OTHER BUI

(

91-1651 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

1,207,130.84)
1,969,257.40

91-1652 ALLOWANCE FOR DEPR'N-MACH./EQU

(

82,040.00)

91-1690 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

(

28,169,455.97)

TOTAL ASSETS

43,824,960.76

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
91-2980 BEGINNING OF YEAR

38,150,052.63

91-2985 ADDITIONS - CURRENT YEAR

5,674,908.13

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

43,824,960.76

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

43,824,960.76

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

43,824,960.76

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

08:00AM

PAGE: 57

Page 100 of 112

ALPINE CITY CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2026
GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT
ASSETS
95-1610 DEFFERED OUTFLOW PENSION

172,528.00

95-1611

59,124.56

AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED-GEN FUND
TOTAL ASSETS

231,652.56

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES
95-2090 SWEEPER LEASE

.01

95-2290 NET PENSION LIABILITY

128,882.00

95-2410 DEFFERED INFLOWS PENSION

578.00

TOTAL LIABILITIES

129,460.01

FUND EQUITY

UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
95-2940 ACC COMP ABSENCES-CURRENT

95,592.89

95-2950 ACC COMP ABSENCES

6,599.66

BALANCE - CURRENT DATE

102,192.55

TOTAL FUND EQUITY

102,192.55

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

231,652.56

FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY

59 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED

02/04/2026

08:00AM

PAGE: 58

Page 101 of 112

ALPINE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SUBJECT:

Proposal for Pressurized Irrigation Projects

FOR CONSIDERATION ON:
PETITIONER:

February 10, 2026

City Staff

ACTION REQUESTED BY PETITIONER:

Review proposed pressurized
irrigation projects.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Following are items that staff are currently working on relating to providing pressurized
irrigation service to the residents of Alpine:
a. Equip 300 N. well with VFD and install new pump
b. Pull pump from Busch well – install new pump if necessary
c. Develop plan for water conservation
i. Consider forming a citizen committee
d. Develop a water shortage response plan
e. Prepare a package of projects for bonding – get proforma from Zion’s Public
Finance
f. Review potential location for PI reservoir in lower zone
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council support the items listed above and provide other feedback and
suggestions to staff.

Page 102 of 112

ALPINE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SUBJECT: Code Amendment Adding 3.34 View Protection Ordinance
FOR CONSIDERATION ON:​ February 10th, 2026
PETITIONER: Councilmembers Andrew Young and Sarah Blackwell
ACTION REQUESTED BY PETITIONER:Approval of the Proposed Code Amendment.
Review Type: Legislative

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
With continued homes and accessory structures increasing in popularity within Alpine
City, Councilmembers Young and Blackwell have proposed an ordinance that would
create standards to limit any potential impacts on neighboring views.
The proposed Scenic Ridgeline, View, and Hillside Protection Ordinance establishes
standards to protect Alpine City’s significant mountain, ridgeline, hillside, and Utah Lake
views by regulating building placement, height, grading, vegetation, and massing. The
ordinance identifies specific protected scenic features and designated public vantage
points, establishes objective criteria for evaluating visual and silhouette intrusion, and
requires a visual impact analysis for applicable development proposals. Additional
standards address hillside development practices, vegetation management, and mitigation
measures to balance scenic resource protection with reasonable use of private property.
Overall, the ordinance provides a comprehensive framework for scenic resource
protection and reflects common goals seen in hillside and ridgeline regulations in Utah
communities. The primary considerations for the Planning Commission are ensuring the
standards remain objective, enforceable, and administratively feasible, while avoiding
unintended constraints on reasonable property development or creating conflicts between
neighboring property owners.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal during their February 3rd meeting and
held a public hearing. Support for the ordinance emphasized the importance of preserving
scenic views that contribute to the character, desirability, and long-term value of the
community, while acknowledging that development should continue in a thoughtful and
balanced manner.
During review, the Planning Commission also identified substantial concerns regarding
enforceability, objectivity, and potential impacts on private property rights. Discussion
focused on the subjectivity of evaluating view impacts, the potential for increased
neighbor-to-neighbor disputes, and the administrative challenges of implementing and
enforcing the proposed standards. Commissioners expressed concern that the ordinance
could create widespread legal nonconforming properties, expose the City to legal
challenges, and function as an attempt to regulate aesthetics rather than land use. It was
further noted that existing zoning regulations, including height limits, setbacks, and the
Sensitive Land Overlay, already address many view-related concerns. Based on these
considerations, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposed
ordinance, concluding that while the goal of protecting scenic views is important, the
proposed framework was overly broad and could result in unintended legal and practical
consequences.

Page 103 of 112

The following motion was made and approved unanimously by the Planning
Commissioners who were in attendance.
MOTION: Planning Commission member John Mackay moved to recommend Denial of
the proposed Scenic Ridgeline, View, and Hillside Protection Ordinance (Alpine City
Code 3.34), based on the following findings:
1.
It imposes unreasonable limitations on a core property right, the Right of
Control and of Surface and Air Rights which provide specific rights to build and
landscape the land’s surface and air above the land. These rights will be found to
prevail in the first instance this ordinance was contested in litigation.
2.
Alpine City has very few open spaces left to develop. The proposed
ordinance would cause an unmanageable requirement to establish legal
non-conforming properties. The vast majority of the city would fall into this
category as to render the objectives of this ordinance mute.
3.
Proposed ordinance would create disputes between neighbors placing the
city in a position of adjudicating such disputes.
4. The proposed ordinance could prevent buildable lots from being developed
rising to claims from property owners of having the city unfairly exercised
eminent domain.
5. This ordinance attempts to legislate good taste, a concept that we have not
attempted to do as a city. We are not an HOA, and we do not create CC&R’s
beyond basic ordinances.
6. This Ordinance would primarily be managed by complaint, leaving it to be
unevenly enforced. Further it would introduce unintended future violations as
landscaping matures.
7.
No development is contemplated adjacent to the 12 public view corridors
rendering the ordinance to be of little value.
8. The Sensitive Land Overlay already addresses concerns regarding silhouette
and ridgeline.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE:
●​ Promote developments, designs, and plans which protect mountain and valley
views. (Policy 1.8 pg. )
CITY CODE REFERENCE:
●​ Creates a new section of the Development Code.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
As a code amendment, this agenda item requires a public hearing and has been noticed
according to state and city code. A public hearing was held during the previous Planning
Commission Meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As a legislative decision, the City Council should make a decision based on the vision
outlined in the General Plan as well as general policies of the City.

Page 104 of 112

SAMPLE MOTIONS:
Motion to Approve:
I move to approve the Scenic Ridgeline, View, and Hillside Protection Ordinance
(Alpine City Code 3.34), based on a finding that the ordinance is consistent with the
General Plan and provides clear standards to balance scenic resource protection with
reasonable use of private property.
Motion to Approve with Conditions
I move to approve the Scenic Ridgeline, View, and Hillside Protection Ordinance
(Alpine City Code 3.34), subject to the following conditions:
*Insert Conditions
Motion to Table:
I move to table the proposed Scenic Ridgeline, View, and Hillside Protection
Ordinance (Alpine City Code 3.34), to a future Planning Commission meeting to allow
for additional review and clarification regarding enforceability, implementation
procedures, and consistency with Utah land use law.
Motion to Deny:
I move to deny of the proposed Scenic Ridgeline, View, and Hillside Protection
Ordinance (Alpine City Code 3.34), based on the following:
*Insert Findings

Page 105 of 112

CITY OF ALPINE, UTAH
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-06
SCENIC RIDGELINE, VIEW, AND HILLSIDE PROTECTION ORDINANCE
(To be codified as Alpine City Code §3.34)

§3.34.010 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of this section is to preserve Alpine’s significant mountain, hillside, ridgeline, and
lake views by regulating buildings, grading, and vegetation that unreasonably obstruct or alter
the natural skyline and hillside as viewed from designated public vantage points and adjacent
properties.
Mountain silhouettes, ridgelines, hillsides and associated landforms are defining visual
resources that contribute to Alpine’s community character and property values. Once
obstructed, these views cannot be restored. This section establishes objective, observable
standards to balance reasonable development rights with the protection of these shared scenic
resources.

§3.34.020 Protected Scenic Views
The following scenic resources are designated as Protected Scenic Views:











Lone Peak
Lone Peak Wilderness hillside
Box Elder Peak
Pfeifferhorn Peak
Big Horn Peak
Chipman Peak
Willow Peak
East Mountain Peak
The Saddle
Mount Timpanogos
Corner Canyon ridgeline and associated landforms
Utah Lake, as visible from elevated areas within Alpine City

Protection applies to the natural silhouette, hillside character, ridgeline profile, and visual
massing of these features as viewed against the sky or natural horizon. Preserved Scenic Views
shall be protected wherever they are visible from designated vantage points or qualifying
personal property within Alpine City, regardless of neighborhood or zoning district.

§3.34.030 Designated Vantage Points
The following locations are designated as official public vantage points:

Page 106 of 112

1.​ Alpine City Entrance Roundabout (primary gateway)
2.​ Creekside Park
3.​ Lambert Park
4.​ Alpine Rodeo Grounds
5.​ Alpine Cemetery
6.​ Alpine City Hall
7.​ Legacy Park
8.​ Burgess Park
9.​ Healey Park
10.​Smooth Canyon Park
For each designated vantage point, the City shall establish official photopoint(s) with recorded
GPS coordinates and orientation. Only official photopoint(s) may be used for regulatory review.

§3.34.040 Definitions

A. Silhouette Intrusion
Any portion of a building, structure, roof form, mechanical equipment, grading, or regulated
vegetation that visually obstructs the natural ridgeline, hillside character, lake or peak outline of
a Preserved Scenic View when observed from a designated vantage point or qualifying adjacent
property.

B. Unreasonable Obstruction
A material reduction of a Preserved Scenic View that:
a) Results from a building, structure, grading, road, lighting, or regulated vegetation;​
b) Significantly interferes with the visibility, continuity, natural silhouette, hillside character, lake
view, or valley visibility of a Preserved Scenic View as observed from a designated vantage
point or a qualifying adjacent property; and​
c) Could be avoided or substantially reduced through reasonable modifications to siting, height,
massing, roof form, grading, road alternative, or vegetation management, without denying
reasonable use of the subject property or safety.
A view impact is not unreasonable solely because a view is partially affected.

C. Degree of Obstruction
The measurable extent to which a Preserved Scenic View is diminished, evaluated based on:
1.​ Silhouette intrusion
2.​ Percentage of preserved feature obscured within the primary field of view
3.​ Interruption of the ridgeline, hillside, lake, form, or peak continuity
4.​ Visual dominance due to height, massing, contrast, color, lighting, or placement
5.​ Change in the view character from natural landscape to built form

Page 107 of 112

D. Hillside character​

The natural face and form of the wilderness base of the surrounding lower mountain landscape.

§3.34.050 General Prohibition
No building, structure, grading, road, modification, or regulated vegetation shall cause a visual
or silhouette intrusion, scaring or defacement, or unreasonable obstruction of a valley, mountain,
lake or hillside Preserved Scenic View.

Presumptions
a) Any visual obstruction or silhouette intrusion is presumed to constitute an unreasonable
obstruction unless no feasible alternative exists.​
b) Obstruction of more than twenty percent (20%) of a preserved scenic feature is presumed
unreasonable unless adequately mitigated.​
c) Minor or incidental obstructions that do not materially alter the view character or silhouette are
not unreasonable.

§3.34.060 Preservation of Views from Personal Property

A. Intent
A substantial portion of Alpine’s residential value and community character derives from views
of surrounding mountains, ridgelines, valley, and Utah Lake as experienced from private
property. This section ensures that new development does not unreasonably eliminate or
materially diminish such views where reasonable alternatives exist.

B. Protected Personal Property Views
Protected personal property views are limited to views of Preserved Scenic Views when such
views are reasonably available from a Primary Viewing Area of an existing residence.
Protection applies only to views that:
1.​ Existed prior to submission of a complete development application; and
2.​ Occupy a meaningful portion of the visual field from the Primary Viewing Area.

C. Primary Viewing Area
A Primary Viewing Area includes interior or exterior portions of a residence intended and
regularly used for living or recreation, including living rooms, family rooms, kitchens, primary
bedrooms, decks, patios, and contiguous yard areas.
Garages, storage areas, mechanical rooms, and non-habitable basements are not Primary
Viewing Areas.

D. Standard of Review

Page 108 of 112

No development shall cause an unreasonable obstruction of a protected personal property view.
In evaluating reasonableness, the City shall consider:
1.​ The degree of obstruction;
2.​ Whether reasonable design alternatives exist; and
3.​ Compatibility with adjacent properties.

E. Documentation
Where adjacent property views may be affected, baseline views shall be documented using
City-approved methods, including photographs and visual simulations taken from the Primary
Viewing Area at standardized eye level. The City may verify or establish baseline
documentation.

F. Limitations
This section does not guarantee preservation of all views and does not create a private right of
action. Enforcement is administered solely by the City.

G. Relationship to Public Vantage Points
Compliance with public vantage point standards does not exempt a project from review under
this section. Development must satisfy both public and personal property view standards.

§3.34.070 Hillside Development Standards
Development on hillsides shall:
1.​ Follow natural contours and avoid abrupt vertical profiles
2.​ Measure height from natural grade, not fill
3.​ Use non-reflective, earth-tone colors compatible with the surrounding terrain
4.​ Limit exterior lighting to shielded, low-intensity fixtures
5.​ Incorporate vegetation that blends with native landscape patterns
6.​ Avoid grading or fill that artificially elevates structures into viewplanes
These standards shall be applied in a manner that preserves reasonable use of the property
while minimizing visual impact to the greatest extent feasible.

§3.34.080 Vegetation and Foliage
Vegetation that materially obstructs Preserved Scenic Views is subject to regulation. Property
owners shall maintain vegetation on an ongoing basis to prevent unreasonable obstruction, and
periodic trimming, height reduction, or reconfiguration may be required where feasible.

§3.34.090 Visual Impact Analysis
Applicants shall submit a Visual Impact Analysis, including City-approved photopoints, existing
and proposed condition simulations, ridgeline silhouette overlays, hillside visual impact overlays,
and a description of design alternatives considered.

Page 109 of 112

§3.34.100 Review and Findings
Approval may be granted only upon findings that:
1.​ The degree of obstruction has been minimized to the greatest extent feasible;
2.​ No silhouette or hillside intrusion occurs, or any intrusion is minimal and unavoidable;
and
3.​ Any remaining impact does not constitute an unreasonable obstruction.
In making these findings, the City shall consider impacts to both designated public vantage
points and protected personal property views.

§3.34.110 Enforcement
Violations may result in modification or removal of non-compliant structures or vegetation,
stop-work orders, withholding of certificates of occupancy, and administrative penalties.

§3.34.120 Severability
If any provision is held invalid, the remainder shall remain in effect.

Page 110 of 112

ALPINE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SUBJECT:

Review Resolution R2025-32: Water Conservation Plan

FOR CONSIDERATION ON:
PETITIONER:

February 10, 2026

City Staff

ACTION REQUESTED BY PETITIONER:

Review the Water Conservation
Plan Adopted as Resolution
R2025-32.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The water conservation plan update required by the State was adopted as Resolution
R2025-32 at the December 9, 2025, City Council meeting. As part of the motion to
approve the plan, the council requested that it be brought back before the City Council in
February for review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Resolution R2025-32 adopting the updated water conservation plan was previously
approved. The plan was sent to the Division of Water Resources where it will be
reviewed for compliance with state code. The water conservation plan is a living
document and can be amended.

Page 111 of 112

ALPINE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SUBJECT:

Review Resolution R2025-33: Water Use and Preservation Element of
the General Plan

FOR CONSIDERATION ON:
PETITIONER:

February 10, 2026

City Staff

ACTION REQUESTED BY PETITIONER:

Review the Water Use and
Preservation Element of the
General Plan Adopted as
Resolution R2025-33.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The water use and preservation element of the General Plan, required by the State, was
adopted as Resolution R2025-33 at the December 9, 2025, City Council meeting. As part
of the motion to approve the plan, the council requested that it be brought back before the
City Council in February for review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Resolution R2025-33 adopting the water use and preservation element of the General
Plan was previously approved. The plan is a living document and can be amended.

Page 112 of 112

If a closed meeting is needed:
Sample Motion
I move to pause the regular meeting and move into a closed meeting
to be held in the Conference Room at City Hall
to discuss _______________ (state the purpose)
- reasonably imminent litigation
- the purchase, exchange, or sale of real property
- the professional character, conduct, or competence of personnel
and that at the end of the closed meeting
the open City Council meeting will be adjourned.

Outcome

Not yet recorded. The record stays open — outcomes are added as minutes and vote results are published.

Provenance

Where this record came from. Every source is listed, permanently.

  • Agenda Watch · Sep 3, 2026

Permanent ID DKT-2026-000711 — this record is never deleted.

Record history

Every change to this record, logged as it happened.

  • Sep 3, 2026 Filed on the Docket
  • Sep 3, 2026 Full document archived — public record

← The full Docket · every meeting, vote, and action on the permanent record · also in the National Record Index.