Automated license plate readers (ALPRs) are usually sold to city councils as tools for solving car thefts and hit-and-runs. But most ALPR networks are built to share data across agency lines, which means a camera bought by one small-town police department can end up searchable by agencies far outside that town — including federal immigration authorities. A string of reports released between 2025 and early 2026 traced, step by step, how that happened inside Flock Safety’s nationwide camera network, and how the company’s own public statements about federal access didn’t always match what its internal records showed.
May 2025: A Reporter Finds Federal Queries Inside Local Systems
Journalists at 404 Media reported that federal immigration authorities had been able to run searches through local police departments’ Flock systems, even though Flock had no direct, national contract with agencies like ICE or CBP. The mechanism was simple: many local departments allow “network sharing,” letting a partner agency’s search pull results from thousands of cameras that belong to entirely different departments. Audit logs reportedly showed search requests tied to immigration-related reason codes, entered by agencies that did have access. The takeaway was uncomfortable but important: the line between local ALPR data and federal immigration enforcement was never a contract. It was a policy setting, and policy settings can be worked around by anyone willing to type in a reason for the search.
July 2025: Sanctuary Cities Discover Their Own Data Got Out
The San Francisco Standard reported that San Francisco and Oakland had shared ALPR data with federal agencies despite state and local sanctuary laws that were supposed to prevent exactly that. Both cities’ written policies barred sharing plate data with immigration authorities. The episode underscored a lesson that shows up again and again in ALPR reporting: a policy on paper does not guarantee compliance in practice. Only an audit of actual search logs reveals what really happened, and most residents never get to see those logs unless a journalist or public-records request forces the issue.
August 2025: Flock Pauses Its Federal Pilot
Facing sustained public scrutiny, Flock halted a pilot program that had begun testing more direct federal agency access to its platform. The pause did not undo the searches already logged, but it marked the first time public pressure visibly changed the company’s roadmap for federal integration — a sign that outside attention on ALPR data flows can shift company behavior, even without new legislation.
February 2026: The CEO’s Own Words Come Under Scrutiny
NPR reported that Flock’s CEO acknowledged that earlier public statements asserting the company had no contracts with federal immigration enforcement were inaccurate. Some arrangement enabling federal access did in fact exist, contradicting the reassurances local officials had relied on when defending their own use of the technology to constituents worried about immigration enforcement.
Why This Timeline Matters
None of these steps required a change in law. Each one happened inside an existing, shared-network system that most city councils approved with only a vendor’s word about how data would be used. The pattern is a useful template for evaluating any ALPR proposal: assume that whatever your department can access, a partner agency can eventually access too, and that public statements about who can and cannot see the data should be verified against actual audit logs, not press releases.
What You Can Do
If your community uses ALPR cameras, ask your local government for the audit log policy and how often it’s reviewed, not just the sharing policy. See where cameras are installed near you on the map, read the basics of how these systems work in our explainer library, and find concrete steps for raising these questions with your council in take action. If you’d rather work with others already organizing on this issue, check whether there’s a group near you in chapters.
Independent, ad-free, reader-funded
No ads, no paywalls, no selling your data. The costs are server bills, the data services behind the map, the Docket and the archives, and the computing power behind the tools being built on top of them. Every dollar readers chip in goes to exactly that.
Support us on PayPal or scan the code, or Venmo @deflocktheusa