The Flock backlash keeps spreading from statehouses to city halls, with San Diego, Virginia, Quincy and Fresno all taking a harder look at what these camera networks actually deliver. Meanwhile a routine Burlington arrest is a reminder that surveillance debates play out against everyday policing, with or without the hardware getting named.
- San Diego City Council to review Flock, other surveillance tech sooner than expected San Diego Union-Tribune
Moving the review up is good, but 'sooner' only matters if the council actually gets real data, not a vendor pitch.
- Virginia Crime Commission weighs more restrictions on Flock camera use The Virginian-Pilot
Virginia lawmakers finally asking what guardrails exist is overdue; cameras without rules are just surveillance on autopilot.
- Quincy ditched Flock surveillance. What exactly did it replace it with? The Boston Globe
If Quincy swapped Flock for something else, taxpayers deserve to know whether the replacement is any more accountable, or just rebranded.
- Burlington police arrest reckless driver after Ford Edge flees WXLV
No mention of what surveillance tool flagged this driver, and that gap is exactly why departments owe the public clearer disclosure.
- City of Fresno will no longer use Flock cameras starting February 2027 ABC30 Fresno
A two-year runway to drop Flock says more about contract terms than principle; watch what fills the gap before celebrating.
Want the full stream? The wire runs all day — and the camera map shows what’s already watching your town.
Independent, ad-free, reader-funded
No ads, no paywalls, no selling your data. The costs are server bills, the data services behind the map, the Docket and the archives, and the computing power behind the tools being built on top of them. Every dollar readers chip in goes to exactly that.
Support us on PayPal or scan the code, or Venmo @deflocktheusa