The Flock Safety debate is playing out on every level today: consumer advice, local expansion pushes, state rulemaking, an audit-driven policy fix, and a chief's simple endorsement. The throughline is consistent — these cameras keep spreading faster than the rules meant to govern them.
- When Flock Comes to Your Town: I Asked Experts What to Do About These AI Cameras CNET
Good that experts are arming residents with questions, but individual vigilance shouldn't substitute for binding local policy.
- BPD says Flock Safety cameras solve crimes faster as contract expansion considered KBAK
"Solves crimes faster" is a marketing line, not a metric — where's the data on false positives and access misuse?
- Lexington's flock cameras face new state regulations, but critics say they don't go far enough LEX 18 News
New state rules are a start, but if critics say they don't go far enough, they probably don't.
- AU police updating license plate data request policy after News 12 inquiry WRDW
Credit to the reporting that forced a policy update — this is exactly what accountability journalism should do.
- Angels Camp Police Chief Supports Use Of License Plate Readers myMotherLode.com
A chief supporting LPRs isn't news; what matters is who else can access that data and for how long.
Want the full stream? The wire runs all day — and the camera map shows what’s already watching your town.
Watch — on our site:
▶Watch on DeFlockWhat Do Flock Cameras Actually Know About You?So That's Why
Independent, ad-free, reader-funded
No ads, no paywalls, no selling your data. The costs are server bills, the data services behind the map, the Docket and the archives, and the computing power behind the tools being built on top of them. Every dollar readers chip in goes to exactly that.
Support us on PayPal or scan the code, or Venmo @deflocktheusa