On the agenda: Campbell County meeting — license plate reader (Sep 1)

Board of Supervisors Meeting
September 1, 2026
6:00 PM
AGENDA
Available via ZOOM
6:00 P.M. – Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance by Chairman Lawton
Moment of Silence

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a.

JOINT MEETING W/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – June 16, 2026

b.

WORK SESSION – July 7, 2026

c.

REGULAR MEETING – July 21, 2026

Documents:
JOINT MEETING WINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 6.16.26.PDF
WORK SESSION 7.7.26.PDF
REGULAR MEETING 7.21.26.PDF
2. APPEARANCES
2.I. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
The Campbell County Board of Supervisors provides the opportunity for general public
comment at a public meeting at least once per quarter, pursuant to Virginia Code
Section 15.2-1416. At this time, the Board invites any citizen who would like to
address the Board to come forward and speak on any topic of concern. Speakers are
asked to limit their remarks to no more than three (3) minutes.
2.II. LISA MOORE - DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE (VTI)
Mrs. Moore will request that the Board consider a $50,000 grant to support Phase I of
VTI’s Small Multifaceted Manufacturing Development Project in Campbell County.

address the Board to come forward and speak on any topic of concern. Speakers are
asked to limit their remarks to no more than three (3) minutes.
2.II. LISA MOORE - DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE (VTI)
Mrs. Moore will request that the Board consider a $50,000 grant to support Phase I of
VTI’s Small Multifaceted Manufacturing Development Project in Campbell County.
Documents:
VTI - SMALL MULTIFACETED MANUFACTURING PROJECT - PHASE I.PDF
2.III. HIGHWAY MATTERS - VDOT
i.

Status of Outstanding Highway Matters: See memorandum

ii.

Highway Matters Action Items: None

iii. Time is scheduled each month for Supervisors to voice any questions or
concerns regarding highway matters.
RECOMMENDATION: Please provide staff with any highway matters the Board
has or that need to be passed along to VDOT.

Documents:
HIGHWAY MATTERS.PDF
3. ADMINISTRATOR’S ITEMS
None
4. CONSENT AGENDA
4.I. APPROPRIATIONS
Attached is an appropriation listing for the Board’s consideration.
Documents:
APPROPRIATIONS.PDF
4.II. COUNTY ATTORNEY INVOICE
Attached is an invoice for $28,845.43 from the County Attorney for services provided
from July 24, 2026 through August 19, 2026.
Services
General Representation:
Real Estate Tax Collection:

$5,848.00
$2,515.50

Personal Property Tax Collection:
Miscellaneous Matters:
Expenses Paid

$688.00

$5,090.70

Personal Property Tax Collection:
Miscellaneous Matters:

$688.00

$5,090.70

Expenses Paid
General Representation:
Real Estate Tax Collection:
Miscellaneous Matters:

$41.20
$12,747.36
$1,914.67

Documents:
COUNTY ATTORNEY INVOICE.PDF
4.III. ABSTRACT OF VOTES
The Registrar has provided an Abstract of Votes from the August 4, 2026, Democratic
Primary and the Republican Primary. Section 24.2-675 of the Code of Virginia
requires the Electoral Board to forward a certified copy of each abstract of votes to the
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to be recorded in its minute book.
Documents:
ABSTRACT OF VOTES.PDF
4.IV. EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT
The Sheriff’s Office was allocated $10,652 under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant Program. This grant is 100% funded with no County match
requirements. This formula grant will be dedicated to replacing 21 handguns with new
Glock 45s, enhanced with red dot sights. This will completely transition full-time
Sheriff’s Office employees to the new weapons system.

In accordance with grant requirements, the public must have an opportunity to
comment on this application during the Board of Supervisors meeting. The Chairman
of the Board will then be able to sign off on the Certifications and Assurances for this
grant, and the local solicitation requirements of the grant will be met.

Documents:
EDWARD BYRNE GRANT.PDF
4.V. AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR TETHERED DRONE GRANT FUNDS
The Campbell County Sheriff’s Office is requesting authorization to apply for a federal
microgrant to purchase two tethered drone systems at a total cost of $105,409.98.
No matching funds or in-kind contribution is required from the County.
Documents:
TETHERED DRONE GRANT.PDF
4.VI. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff Recommends The Board:
a.

Approve the appropriations as presented;

TETHERED DRONE GRANT.PDF
4.VI. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff Recommends The Board:
a.

Approve the appropriations as presented;

b.

Approve the County Attorney invoice of $28,845.43;

c. Authorize the recordation of the Abstract of Votes from the August 4, 2026,
Democratic Primary and the Republican Primary in the minutes of the
September 1, 2026, regular meeting;
d. Allow for any public comment to meet the requirements of the Edward
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant;
e. Authorize the Sheriff’s Office to apply for a federal microgrant to
purchase two tethered drone systems at a total cost of $105,409.98.

5. APPOINTMENTS
Attached for your review is a list of appointments.
Documents:
APPOINTMENTS.PDF
6. MATTERS FROM THE BOARD
A few minutes are scheduled at each meeting to discuss matters from the Board.
Documents:
MATTERS FROM THE BOARD.PDF
7. CLOSED MEETING
a.
Staff is requesting the Campbell County Board of Supervisors enter into
Closed Session in accordance with Section 2.2-3711 (A)(7) of the Code of Virginia
to discuss legal matters related to a public nuisance.
b.
Staff is requesting the Campbell County Board of Supervisors enter into
Closed Session in accordance with Section 2.2-3711 (A)(7) of the Code of Virginia
to consult with legal counsel pertaining to possible or pending litigation
regarding the Region 2000 Services Authority.
c.
Following the return to open session, the Board shall provide staff
direction concerning the matters discussed in closed session.
8.

7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following public hearing was advertised (ad attached) for:

Kate N. Reusch, Planner
Documents:
LEGAL AD.PDF

Kate N. Reusch, Planner
Documents:
LEGAL AD.PDF
8.I. #PL-26-154 REZONING – 383 VILLAGE HIGHWAY
Request by Asad Imtiaz of Ash Holdings LLC to rezone the property located at 383
Village Highway and further identified as tax map parcel 34A-22-1D from Business –
General Commercial to Residential – Single Family to renovate the existing singlefamily dwelling. The property is located in the Rustburg Election District and in an
area designated as medium to high density mixed per the current Comprehensive
Plan.
The applicant is seeking to rezone the parcel to R-SF in order to renovate the existing
single-family dwelling and return it to residential use. The current structure is a
single-family dwelling that was built in 1959 and predates the zoning code. The use of
the property as a residence is a non-conforming use; however, the property has been
vacant and has not been used as a single-family residence for more than 2 years.
Any future use of the property must conform with the current zoning code. The
applicant has also purchased the gas station next door and has stated that he
intends to use the dwelling for his personal use.
The request is considered a downzoning because it reduces the land use intensity
that would otherwise be permitted on the property. Piecemeal downzonings are
impermissible under Virginia law except where there is a change in circumstances, a
mistake in fact, or fraud.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of
the request by a vote of 6-0, citing a change in circumstances, as this area is
primarily residential and has not developed commercially.

Documents:
BOARD PACKET.PDF
9. AGENCY MINUTES AND REPORTS
Documents:
SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD - MAY 2026.PDF
SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD - JUNE 2026.PDF
SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD - JULY 2026.PDF
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 2026.PDF
10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Documents:
INCREASED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY-SMALLER LOTS - AUGUST 2026.PDF
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROCESS, COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY - AUGUST
2026.PDF
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE SCHEDULE - AUGUST 2026.PDF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL REPORT - AUGUST 2026.PDF
11. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING SCHEDULE
Revised 8/24/2026

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL REPORT - AUGUST 2026.PDF
11. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING SCHEDULE
Revised 8/24/2026

Tuesday, September 1st
6:00 PM – Regular Administrative Business Meeting
7:00 PM – Public Hearings

Tuesday, September 15th
6:00 PM – Broadband Authority; Reassessment Work Session

Tuesday, October 6th
6:00 PM – Regular Administrative Business Meeting
7:00 PM – Public Hearings
Tuesday, October 20th
6:00 PM – Joint Work Session w/CCUSA
Thursday, November 5th
6:00 PM – Regular Administrative Business Meeting
7:00 PM – Public Hearings
Tuesday, November 10th
5:30 PM – EMS/Fire Meeting (Multi-Use Room)
Residents having any questions or comments regarding any of the above
agenda items may click here to provide the Board of Supervisors your
feedback.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
June 16, 2026
A meeting of the Campbell County Board of Supervisors was held on the 16th day of June
2026 in the Multi-Use Room of the Walter J. Haberer Building, Rustburg, Virginia. The members
present were:
Tom K. Lawton, Chairman, Presiding
Kenneth R. Brown
Justin A. Carwile
Matt W. Cline
Paul E. Dowdy
Jon R. Hardie
Charlie A. Watts, II

Altavista Election District
Spring Hill Election District
Timberlake Election District
Concord Election District
Sunburst Election District
Rustburg Election District
Brookneal Election District

Present from the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) were:
Vance Driskill, Chairman, Presiding
Brad Hall
Dennis Rosser
George Rosser
Don Wooldridge

Timberlake Election District
Brookneal Election District
Concord Election District
Altavista Election District
Spring Hill Election District

Absent were:
Jack Dean
Thomas Vaughan, III

Rustburg Election District
Sunburst Election District

Also present were:
Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Paul E. Harvey, Assistant County Administrator
Brooke S. Wright, Office Manager
Nina R. Rezai, Director of Economic Development
Chairman Lawton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Chairman Driskill called the
meeting of the Industrial Development Authority to order at 6:00 p.m.
Administrator Rogers welcomed members of both bodies, noting the value of meeting
jointly to review progress on major economic development initiatives, discuss emerging
opportunities, and receive guidance from both governing bodies before advancing projects.
//

CEDS GOALS UPDATE

Nina Rezai, Director of Economic Development, opened the presentation by reviewing the
County's Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) and its project priority matrix,
which serves as a guide for the Economic Development Commission and staff in evaluating and
prioritizing projects. She explained that the matrix ranks initiatives according to both priority and
complexity and is reviewed semiannually to monitor progress and ensure County resources remain
focused on Board-established priorities.
Ms. Rezai highlighted several accomplishments achieved during the past year. She
announced the completion of the County's new brand identity, including the new logo and the
tagline, "Tradition Meets Tomorrow." She explained that the branding effort represented
approximately one year of work involving public input, collaboration with community partners,
internal staff discussions, and numerous revisions before its recent public unveiling. The new
brand would gradually be incorporated throughout County facilities, gateway signage,
publications, promotional materials, and online platforms.
Ms. Rezai also provided updates on several strategic initiatives identified within the CEDS.
Utility extensions continue within Seneca Commerce Park, with the water line completed to serve
the future Blue Ridge Beverage facility and sewer construction progressing toward completion

before the end of the year. She reported that the Virginia Technical Institute (VTI) small-scale
manufacturing incubator project had secured Tobacco Region Revitalization Commission (TRRC)
funding to renovate unused space into approximately 30,000 square feet of flexible manufacturing
space intended to accommodate emerging industries and provide temporary locations for
expanding manufacturers while permanent facilities are constructed.
Additional updates included continued implementation of the Start Smart Campbell grant
program and the Restaurants That Rent initiative. Staff reported that Bacon Street Bagels is
utilizing the restaurant program and anticipates opening on Wards Road following completion of
tenant improvements. Rustic Roots Salon in Altavista recently celebrated its grand opening after
receiving a Start Smart Campbell grant, providing new personal care services within the
community.
Ms. Rezai provided a detailed update regarding development of a regional food hub
initiative. Originally envisioned as a Campbell County project, discussions with local agricultural
producers demonstrated that a regional approach would provide greater opportunities for both
producers and consumers. She explained that the proposed food hub would function primarily as
an online marketplace where residents could purchase locally produced agricultural products from
multiple farms through a centralized ordering system with designated pickup locations throughout
the region. The initiative is intended to reduce marketing burdens on individual producers, increase
consumer access to locally grown products, and eventually expand into wholesale opportunities.
She noted that while Campbell County has numerous agricultural producers, current production
levels are generally insufficient to support large-scale commercial food distribution independently.
The Board discussed opportunities to partner with nonprofit organizations and regional agencies
to administer the program and pursue grant funding through the TRRC and USDA Rural
Development. Members also emphasized the importance of continuing to strengthen agricultural
education through local FFA programs and partnerships with Campbell County Public Schools.
//

IDA BUILDING IN SENECA COMMERCE PARK

Ms. Rezai provided an update regarding construction of the 45,000 square foot speculative
industrial building being developed by the IDA, which had progressed substantially over the past
year. While no tenant agreements have been finalized, Vance Driskill, IDA Chairman, indicated
that market interest has increased considerably during recent months. The majority of inquiries
have involved prospective tenants seeking occupancy of the entire building, although the structure
was intentionally designed to allow subdivision into multiple tenant spaces should market
conditions warrant.
Board members discussed the building's design, including loading dock access, parking,
utility layout, and flexibility for future tenant improvements. Mr. Driskill explained that the
electrical and utility systems were designed to accommodate two separate tenants if necessary and
that additional loading docks or entrances could be added in the future depending upon tenant
needs. Ms. Rezai reviewed current marketing efforts, noting that the building is listed through
commercial real estate platforms including LoopNet and CoStar and is represented by Coldwell
Banker, a commercial real estate broker. Inquiries have originated through direct contacts,
commercial listings, and referrals from the Virginia Economic Development Partnership. She
further noted that buildings of this size are particularly attractive to businesses already operating
within the region that are seeking opportunities to expand while remaining in Central Virginia.
//

YELLOW BRANCH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL

Ms. Rezai then engaged members in an extensive discussion regarding County-owned
property located near the intersection of Route 24 and Route 29. The property was originally
acquired during utility extension efforts and now possesses water and sewer infrastructure, making
it suitable for commercial development. She explained that the County commissioned a grocery
store feasibility study to determine the highest and best use of the property after receiving
numerous inquiries from prospective developers.
The study concluded that the site is well suited for a community-scale grocery store
anchored by additional commercial development. Ms. Rezai reviewed demographic, traffic count,
and consumer preference data indicating that the location could successfully support a
neighborhood grocery retailer such as Food Lion, Aldi, or Lidl, rather than a larger regional

destination retailer. While the site receives significant daily traffic, she explained that overlapping
traffic counts on adjacent roadways reduce the number of unique travelers, making smaller-format
grocery stores a more realistic recruitment target.
Board members discussed complementary commercial uses that would strengthen the
development. Several members expressed strong support for recruiting Tractor Supply, True
Value, or another hardware retailer to address an identified service gap within the Rustburg area.
Additional suggestions included a pharmacy, automotive parts retailer, and other neighborhoodserving businesses. Members observed that residents currently travel considerable distances to
purchase hardware supplies and that a retailer of this type would likely serve customers from
throughout the surrounding area.
Ms. Rezai also presented conceptual ideas for the remaining acreage, including indoor
sports facilities, fitness centers, entertainment venues, mixed-use development, and community
gathering spaces. Supervisor Hardie thought a fitness center, such as a YMCA, would be a
valuable amenity for the parcel. The consensus of the Board was that the property should remain
focused primarily on commercial development that would increase services for residents while
strengthening the marketability of a grocery-anchored retail center. Staff was directed to continue
marketing the property for commercial development, pursue discussions with VDOT regarding
roadway access improvements, evaluate additional site preparation activities, develop promotional
signage advertising the property as future commercial space, and prepare recommendations
regarding future capital investments necessary to enhance the site's marketability.
//

RESIDENTIAL TAX REHABILITATION PROGRAM

The final discussion centered on a proposed residential tax rehabilitation incentive program
intended to encourage investment in Campbell County's aging housing stock. Ms. Rezai explained
that many homes throughout the County are approaching or have exceeded 50 years of age and
may require substantial improvements to remain attractive and competitive within the housing
market. The Board revisited a residential tax rehabilitation incentive program that had previously
been discussed as a means of encouraging investment in Campbell County's older housing stock.
Ms. Rezai indicated that the 50-year threshold was selected because a number of the County's
established single-family neighborhoods are approaching an age at which substantial reinvestment
may be needed. The intent of the proposed program would be to encourage homeowners to make
significant improvements to existing homes, maintain property values, encourage people to remain
in and improve older homes, and ultimately improve the County's housing stock.
Ms. Rezai presented two policy options modeled after the County's existing commercial
and industrial tax rehabilitation program. Under the first proposal, a qualifying residential structure
would need to be at least 50 years old, and the owner would need to make improvements that
increased the assessed value of the structure by at least 40 percent. The proposed improvements
could not increase the home's square footage by more than 15 percent. She explained that the
purpose of the limitations was to encourage substantial rehabilitation of the existing structure
rather than primarily subsidizing construction of additions or substantially larger homes. Examples
of qualifying improvements could include major roofing work, electrical upgrades, new windows,
and other significant system-wide improvements undertaken as part of a larger rehabilitation
project. The intent was not to allow a homeowner to make incremental improvements over several
years, such as replacing a few windows one year and additional windows the next, but rather to
encourage a substantial investment in the property at one time.
Ms. Rezai explained that the property owner would have to apply for the program before
obtaining the building permit for the renovation. Once approved, the property's assessment would
be frozen at its pre-renovation value for up to five years. Beginning in the sixth year, the
homeowner would pay taxes based upon the property's post-renovation assessed value. She noted
that the timing of enrollment would be important because participating immediately before a
reassessment could maximize the benefit to the property owner.
Supervisor Watts questioned whether the five-year benefit would provide enough financial
incentive to encourage homeowners to undertake major renovations. Ms. Rezai explained that the
proposal was not necessarily intended to make a renovation financially feasible on its own, but
rather to provide some assistance to property owners who were already prepared to make a
significant investment. She identified two primary groups that could benefit: existing homeowners

who are aging in place and wish to substantially improve their homes, and individuals who
purchase older homes at a lower price but then face significant renovation expenses.
Members questioned how the 40-percent improvement threshold would be calculated and
who would determine whether a property qualified. Ms. Rezai explained that the threshold would
be based upon the increase in the value of the home rather than simply the amount of money spent
on the renovation, with the assessment process involving the County's real estate and the
Commissioner of the Revenue's offices. The discussion also clarified that the program was not
specifically designed as a poverty or affordable-housing program. Rather, it was intended
primarily to encourage rehabilitation of older properties and prevent existing housing stock from
continuing to deteriorate.
Ms. Rezai presented a second option that retained the basic structure of the first proposal
but extended the benefit from five years to ten years. She explained that the additional five years
could make the incentive more meaningful to homeowners making substantial investments
because the tax savings under the five-year model could be relatively small compared with the
amount of money required to rehabilitate a property. Under the second proposal, the homeowner
would receive the benefit for ten years, with the tax liability beginning to increase during years 8,
9, and 10. During each of those years, the tax bill would increase by approximately 25 percent,
allowing the homeowner to gradually adjust to the full post-renovation assessment. Beginning in
year 11, the homeowner would pay the full tax amount based upon the improved assessment.
Ms. Rezai presented examples using actual County properties to illustrate the potential
financial impact. The examples compared the existing tax bill with the expected tax bill after
renovation and calculated the estimated savings to the property owner under both the five-year
and ten-year approaches. She acknowledged that even the ten-year program was not necessarily
expected to be the primary catalyst causing someone to undertake a renovation that otherwise
would not occur. Instead, the purpose was to provide a meaningful additional incentive and support
homeowners who were willing to make significant investments in their properties.
Board members discussed several aspects of the proposals, including eligibility
requirements, the minimum fifty-year age threshold, qualifying renovation costs, and limitations
on increasing square footage. Supervisor Cline and Supervisor Hardie questioned whether the
proposed 15 percent limitation on additional square footage would unintentionally exclude
worthwhile projects such as finishing basements or modest home additions. Supervisor Hardie
also suggested reducing the minimum age requirement to allow more homeowners to participate
or extending the incentive period to maximize its value. Questions were also raised regarding
whether tax incentives should transfer to subsequent homeowners if qualifying properties were
sold before the incentive period expired.
The Board’s consensus was to continue evaluating the concept and have staff return with
additional information and revised parameters. Ms. Rezai was asked to further examine the
proposed square-footage limitation, including the treatment of finished and below-grade
basements; evaluate whether the 40-percent assessed-value requirement should be reduced;
consider whether a tiered structure based upon property value would make the program more
effective; and gather additional information regarding comparable programs and their results. The
Board generally expressed more favorable views toward a ten-year benefit, while recognizing that
the final parameters should be developed after additional analysis.
//

ADJOURNMENT OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

On motion of Mr. Brad Hall, seconded by Mr. Dennis Rosser, the meeting of the Industrial
Development Authority was adjourned at 7:32 p.m.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Driskill, Hall, D. Rosser, G. Rosser, Wooldridge
None
Dean, Vaughan

REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION FROM NOISE ORDINANCE - YUILLE

Ozell Yuille, 58 Yuille Lane, Gladys, submitted a request for an exception from the Noise
Ordinance for a Family Reunion at 57 Yuille Lane in Gladys on July 4-5, 2026, to reunite with

family and friends. The request was to extend the time from 10:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. for the annual
family reunion, which includes a cookout, games, and music. They were anticipating 75 people
to attend.
On motion of Supervisor Watts, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors approves an
Exception from the Noise Ordinance for a family reunion event at 57 Yuille Lane, Gladys, on July
4-5, 2026, from 10:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Supervisor Cline, the meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m.

The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

____________________________________
TOM K. LAWTON, CHAIRMAN
Approved: _________________

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
July 7, 2026
The regular meeting of the Campbell County Board of Supervisors was held on the 7th day
of July 2026 in the Multi-Use Room of the Walter J. Haberer Building, Rustburg, Virginia. The
members present were:
Tom K. Lawton, Chairman, Presiding
Justin A. Carwile
Matt W. Cline
Paul E. Dowdy
Jon R. Hardie
Charlie A. Watts II
Absent was:
Kenneth R. Brown

Altavista Election District
Timberlake Election District
Concord Election District
Sunburst Election District
Rustburg Election District
Brookneal Election District

Spring Hill Election District

Also present were:
Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Clifton M. Tweedy, Deputy County Administrator
Paul Harvey, Assistant County Administrator
Catherine H. Moore, Clerk
Brian Stokes, Director of Community Development
Karissa Shrader, Zoning Administrator
Kate Reusch, Planner

Chairman Lawton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. This meeting was scheduled to
discuss a new zoning district, Industrial Intensive I-I.
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on May 19, 2026, Rob Mann, External Affairs
Manager for AEP, presented an update on the company's ongoing evaluation of the Joshua Falls
site for a potential Small Modular Reactor (SMR) nuclear generation facility. The presentation
outlined the project's current status, emphasizing that AEP was in the early evaluation phase and
had not submitted a request for project approval. Since the project’s announcement in November
2024, environmental studies, engineering analyses, meteorological monitoring, and other site
evaluations had been underway as part of the extensive licensing process required by the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The presentation included a request by AEP to begin
discussions with the County regarding the long-term land use and zoning framework necessary to
accommodate a project of this nature should the site ultimately prove suitable. He requested the
Board consider incorporating provisions for an SMR facility into the Comprehensive Plan and
zoning ordinance. AEP expressed a preference for allowing SMRs as a by-right use due to concerns
of being unable to advance the project through the federal permitting process as local land use
approval is required.

A draft ordinance was provided to the Board at this meeting for review and feedback. The
draft includes “small modular reactor facility” as a permitted use in a new zoning district, I-I. In
other words, an application for a SMR would require a rezoning before the Planning Commission
and the Board of Supervisors. Staff noted that proffers could be submitted with a rezoning request.
Mr. Stokes reviewed the draft ordinance for a new Zoning District I-I that was intended to
establish areas suitable for large-scale industrial, energy generation, utility, research, and
technology-related uses that require substantial infrastructure, utility capacity and transportation
access. A SMR was capable of producing up to 300 megawatts (MW) of electricity per unit. To
date, there were no localities in Virginia that had identified SMRs as a permitted use within a
zoning ordinance. Nor has any Virginia locality allowed SMRs as a by-right use. Furthermore,
staff was not able to identify any jurisdiction nationwide that permitted SMRs as a by-right use.
Mr. Stokes added that all aspects of SMRs were regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC).
In his review of the draft ordinance, Mr. Stokes noted the development and operation of a
SMR Facility must conform to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and in the event of a
conflict, the NRC requirements would supersede other regulations cited in the ordinance. The
erosion control and stormwater management plan requirements were more robust than in a usual
application, and the ordinance required a decommissioning plan. A paragraph was included to
indicate that County approval would not be issued until the NRC had completed its approval and
permitting processes. A hazardous material plan was required to be submitted to the County upon
approval from the NRC. The applicant would be required to identify the type of cooling technology
that would be utilized.
Mr. Stokes indicated that AEP had reviewed the draft ordinance and submitted several edits
to the ordinance. Those edits were not included in this overview.
During the Board’s review of the proposed ordinance, a number of items were discussed
including contracting with a consultant in the development of the ordinance, setbacks and
minimum distances from residences or schools, noise levels, height limitations, sidewalk
requirements and the number of allowable SMRs and maximum MW on a site. Supervisor Cline
was in favor of the establishment of an emergency planning zone and the applicant providing safety
and security training for the County’s First Responders, Public Safety and law enforcement
personnel. There was a suggestion the ordinance include a decommissioning bond and a
recommendation to delete “energy storage system” from Definitions as AEP had no plans for
energy storage batteries.
In answer to a question by Supervisor Hardie, the creation of a new I-I zoning district would
require public hearings for the rezoning request as opposed to allowing the use by-right in an I-H
(Industrial Heavy) District. He had concerns about creating this district and allowing SMRs as a
by-right use. Supervisor Hardie favored the special use permit process in order to consider the
various nuances and factors that could come to light in the application process.

Administrator Rogers commented that AEP had asked the Board to consider a by-right use
in the County’s ordinance to allow them to respond to land use questions as they move through the
Federal regulatory process.
As to the potential tax revenue from SMRs, Administrator Rogers indicated staff did not
have that answer. Certain equipment related to energy generation would be exempt.
Supervisor Carwile commented the special use permit process would provide more
discussion on the application including any conditions. If SMRs were placed in I-I District
requiring a special use permit, the applicant could apply for a rezoning and special use permit
concurrently.
There was a question concerning the disposal of nuclear waste by-products. Mr. Stokes
indicated it was his understanding the material would be disposed of or contained on-site. The end
of life of the material was included in the NRC permitting process along with the citing, design,
construction and operations.
Supervisor Hardie asked if an application could be brought forward if the Board did not
define the use in the County Code. The answer was no. In another question, the Town of Altavista
and the Town of Brookneal had authority over zoning decisions in the towns.
Chairman Lawton raised a question regarding the type of cooling technology being
proposed. Mr. Mann indicated AEP was looking at a closed loop system.
Administrator Rogers appreciated the Board’s discussion and input on the new zoning
district. He believed there was consensus on pausing the timeline to make sure the County had a
good ordinance and bringing in a subject matter expert to assist in the process. There may be some
costs associated with bringing in an expert that may require an additional appropriation of funds.
//

OTHER MATTERS FROM THE BOARD

In answer to a question by Chairman Lawton, the small modular reactor project was a
separate project from the Valley Link transmission line and the AEP substation project.
//

ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Supervisor Cline, the meeting was adjourned at 7:21 p.m.

The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:

Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
Brown
____________________________________
TOM K. LAWTON, CHAIRMAN
Approved: ___________________________

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
July 21, 2026
The regular meeting of the Campbell County Board of Supervisors was held on the 21st
day of July 2026 in the Board of Supervisors meeting room of the Walter J. Haberer Building,
Rustburg, Virginia. The members present were:
Tom K. Lawton, Chairman, Presiding
Kenneth R. Brown
Justin A. Carwile
Matt W. Cline
Paul E. Dowdy
Jon R. Hardie
Charlie A. Watts, II

Altavista Election District
Spring Hill Election District
Timberlake Election District
Concord Election District
Sunburst Election District
Rustburg Election District
Brookneal Election District

Also present were:
Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Clifton M. Tweedy, Deputy County Administrator
Paul E. Harvey, Assistant County Administrator
F.E. “Tripp” Isenhour, III, County Attorney
Brooke S. Wright, Office Manager
Chairman Lawton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Following the Pledge of
Allegiance, a moment of silence was observed.
//

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

On motion of Supervisor Brown, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors dispenses with
the reading and approves the minutes of the April 14, 2026 work session, the May 5, 2026 regular
meeting, the May 12, 2026 joint meeting with the School Board, and the June 2, 2026 regular
meeting, as presented.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

RECOGNITION OF CLIFTON TWEEDY

The Board’s first appearance recognized Clifton “Clif” M. Tweedy in advance of his
retirement from full-time Campbell County service. Chairman Lawton expressed the Board’s
appreciation for Mr. Tweedy’s many years of service and specifically recognized his integrity,
honesty, knowledge, ability, and the close working relationships he had developed with the Board,
county staff, and regional partners.
Administrator Rogers thanked the Board for the opportunity to recognize Mr. Tweedy’s
remarkable public service career, describing his character and professionalism as an exemplary
standard. He cherished Mr. Tweedy as a colleague and friend.
On motion of Supervisor Hardie, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors adopts the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION IN HONOR OF CLIFTON “CLIF” M. TWEEDY
WHEREAS, Mr. Clif Tweedy has honorably served Campbell County and its residents for
34 consecutive years, in the roles of Interim County Administrator, Assistant County
Administrator, Public Works Director, and Deputy County Administrator; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tweedy was instrumental in the successful planning and development of
many County facilities, including schools, County offices, parks, and the landfill over three
decades; and

WHEREAS, Mr. Tweedy routinely served as a knowledgeable, cooperative and engaged
liaison to our partnering organizations, including the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT), the Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority (BRRJ), the Campbell County Utilities and
Services Authority (CCUSA), and the Region 2000 Services Authority; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tweedy supported Campbell County Administration, the Board, and
Public Works staff as an objective, fair, informed, and diligent leader through many projects,
issues, changes, and achievements; and
WHEREAS, beyond his distinguished public service, Mr. Tweedy has generously shared
his woodworking talents and craftsmanship, creating works that reflect the character, pride, and
enduring spirit of Campbell County that will leave a lasting legacy for future generations; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tweedy will retire from full-time Campbell County public service on
July 31, 2026, with full admiration, congratulations, and well wishes from County staff, the Board
of Supervisors, and regional friends and partners; and
WHEREAS, throughout his life and career, Mr. Tweedy has given exemplary service, time,
energy, and vision toward the current and future well-being of the Campbell County locality and
its people; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors and County staff would like to recognize Mr.
Tweedy for his many years of distinguished service and significant contributions to our
community; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board does hereby congratulate Mr. Clif
Tweedy on the occasion of his retirement, and expresses heartfelt and deeply held appreciation for
his many years of outstanding service to Campbell County;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board does hereby extend its best wishes to Clif, his
lovely wife Lou, and their family, toward a bright and very happy future in retirement.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

Mr. Tweedy addressed the Board and expressed his appreciation for the recognition and
for the support he had received throughout his career from his family, the current and previous
Boards of Supervisors, county staff, and the county’s many supporting organizations. He
emphasized that relationships and the willingness of people to work together and contribute their
individual talents had been among the most important aspects of his career. He stated that he had
been blessed to have people willing to help and support him throughout the years and thanked the
Board for the recognition.
//

SHELLY EVANS

Shelly Evans, 1254 Spring Mill Road, Concord, addressed the Board regarding the
proposed Valley Link transmission project, the proposed Joshua Falls substation, and Appalachian
Power’s proposed small modular reactor project. Ms. Evans read the following statement into the
record:
“I implore the Campbell County Board of Supervisors to look to the future and envision
what we want our county to look like. Do we want more open land with nice views, birds singing,
and lightning bugs illuminating our nights with hope, or do we want heavy industry, constant noise,
and huge power lines crisscrossing the landscape? I vote for the former, and I expect most residents
would agree. I urge the Board to adopt a resolution, as eight other counties have done, opposing
the Valley Link transmission line, and to do all that you can to prevent AEP 's proposed SMR.
Let's keep Campbell County a safe and pleasant place to live.”
Ms. Evans added that the Valley Link transmission line would change the landscape not
only of Concord but the entirety of Central Virginia. The land within several miles on either side

of this transmission line would be subject to new development pressure for substations, data
centers, and transmission line connectors. Valley Link and AEP have already proposed two new
transmission lines going in two different directions within Campbell County. These projects
planned for the Concord area made her decide to speak out about what was best for the community.
She had started two petitions: the first asking the Board to adopt a resolution opposing the Valley
Link transmission line, and the second asking the Board and the Planning Commission not to allow
SMRs by-right. She stated that over half the people in Concord that she had spoken to were not
aware of what was planned for the area along Stage Road, Archer Mill Road, and Quarry Lane.
Concord and rural Virginia did not want power lines, power stations, or data centers spoiling their
quiet nights, sucking up their water, or ruining their view. She believed the decisions made
regarding these projects would set a precedent in the United States, and urged the Board not to set
a bad one.
//

CODIE HURD

Codie Hurd, 1198 Wards Road, Altavista, addressed the Board regarding difficulties she
had experienced in attempting to ensure that all of her county taxes were properly paid. She
explained that over approximately 11 years she had encountered recurring issues involving
personal property and real estate taxes, which on several occasions resulted in restrictions affecting
her business license, contractor’s license, and vehicle registrations. She explained that she had
developed the practice of personally visiting the Treasurer’s office, providing identifying
information, and paying the amounts she was told were due in an effort to avoid future problems.
Despite those efforts, she said she recently discovered that a real estate tax account had not been
paid and that she had incurred fees and penalties.
Ms. Hurd questioned whether the County’s existing tax-account system and processes
could be improved so taxpayers could more easily identify all accounts associated with their
properties. She said that, from the taxpayer’s perspective, the system appeared difficult to navigate
and suggested that additional staff training or improved search capabilities might help prevent
similar situations. She emphasized that she did not believe county staff intended to punish
taxpayers, but believed the issue might be a systems or process problem that could be addressed.
During the discussion, Tripp Isenhour, County Attorney, explained that real estate tax accounts
were established from land records and deeds rather than Social Security numbers, and that Social
Security information was not tied to real estate accounts. Ms. Hurd stated that her primary concern
was that taxpayers who make a good-faith effort to pay their taxes should have a reasonable means
of determining whether they have outstanding obligations before penalties, DMV stops, or other
consequences occur.
//

PAUL MCDONALD & MIKE REGAN

Paul McDonald and Mike Regan, representatives of the Block Valley Link organization,
addressed the Board regarding the proposed Valley Link transmission project and the proposed
relocation of the Joshua Falls substation. Mr. McDonald stated that the Board should recognize its
local zoning authority over electrical substations and distinguish that authority from the State
Corporation Commission’s authority over high-voltage transmission lines. He referenced a 2015
Virginia Supreme Court decision involving a switching station and said other Virginia counties
had recently exercised local authority over substations. He urged the Board to carefully evaluate
the proposed Joshua Falls substation and consider the long-term implications of the project. He
also raised concerns about potential health effects associated with electromagnetic fields from
high-voltage transmission infrastructure and encouraged the Board to review information provided
by experts.
Mr. Regan provided a detailed presentation concerning the development and evolution of
the Valley Link project. He described how the project had changed from earlier planning concepts
that contemplated an upgrade to the existing Joshua Falls substation and substantial use of existing
rights-of-way to a much larger, predominantly or entirely greenfield transmission project. He
reviewed planning documents from PJM and discussed the proposed relocation of the Joshua Falls
substation, the proposed transmission routes, and the potential for future expansion of the
substation and associated transmission infrastructure. Mr. Regan emphasized that the Board should
consider not only the initial configuration of the proposed facility but also its potential long-term
buildout.

Mr. Regan further stated that planning documents had identified Joshua Falls as a strategic
transmission node and suggested that future transmission projects could increase the scale of
development in and around the proposed substation. He questioned whether the Board would have
sufficient information about the ultimate configuration of the substation when it considered any
future special use permit. He encouraged the Board to examine the number and type of
transformers, potential additional transmission lines, and the long-term implications of approving
the project. He also argued that alternative approaches to meeting Northern Virginia’s power
demand had appeared in other regional planning cycles and stated that Campbell County should
focus primarily on the interests and long-term welfare of its residents.
Supervisor Watts questioned Mr. Regan regarding Virginia’s electrical generation and
transmission infrastructure and whether the state was experiencing a shortage of transmission
capacity or generation capacity. Mr. Regan responded that, based on his review of planning
documents, Virginia could potentially have generation needs, but transmission needs could be
addressed through alternatives involving existing rights-of-way rather than necessarily requiring
new greenfield transmission lines. He acknowledged that the region may face power deficits but
stated that Valley Link was not the only possible means of addressing those needs. Chairman
Lawton asked for clarification on the distinction between the State Corporation Commission’s
authority over transmission lines and the Board’s local authority concerning substations. Mr.
Isenhour indicated that local zoning authority over the substation remained with the County.
//

DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – NINA REZAI,
DIRECTOR

The Board received a comprehensive overview from Nina Rezai, Director of Economic
Development, concerning the department’s organization, programs, accomplishments, and current
projects. She described the department’s work as encompassing seven primary areas, including
small-business assistance, grant management, industrial development, tourism, communications,
marketing, and project development. The department currently includes the director, three fulltime staff members, a part-time grant coordinator, and a planned position focused on business
development and agricultural programs.
Ms. Rezai reviewed several small-business programs. The Restaurants that Rent
reimbursement program provides up to $15,000 in reimbursement over one year to assist new
restaurants locating in Campbell County. She identified several businesses benefiting from the
program. The Start Smart Campbell Grant program provides a one-time $5,000 competitive grant
to new businesses, entrepreneurs, or businesses establishing their first Campbell County location
or operating for less than three years. Applicants complete educational components through the
Small Business Development Center or Spark Innovation Center and submit business plans as part
of the competition. The program is offered during two cycles each year. She also noted that the
Town of Altavista had leveraged Campbell County’s investment in this program to obtain an
additional $100,000 in prize funding through a community business launch program.
Ms. Rezai reported that Campbell Connects, which has operated since 2022, has
experienced declining attendance and is being reconsidered for Fiscal Year 2027. Rather than
continuing to rely primarily on large group meetings, the department intends to explore ways to
engage businesses directly in the community. She also discussed the CLiMB Fund, a revolving
low-interest loan program operated on behalf of the Industrial Development Authority. The
program provides businesses with access to financing for needs such as payroll, inventory, fixtures,
and other business expenses when traditional financing may not be readily available.
Grant management was identified as another important area of the department’s work. Ms.
Rezai explained that the County had previously identified grant administration as an area in which
it was not fully taking advantage of available opportunities. Claude Dixon, the part-time grant
coordinator, has helped the County secure funding for a variety of projects. Ms. Rezai was happy
to report that since Fiscal Year 2024, approximately $4.8 million in grant funding had been
awarded. Examples discussed included a National Endowment for the Arts grant supporting a
mural at Patrick Henry Memorial Library, agricultural cost-share programs that facilitated more
than $550,000 in investment into local producers, utility extension work at Seneca Commerce
Park, and site-readiness work associated with a 100,000-square-foot building.

Ms. Rezai also reviewed the department’s support for the Brookneal/Campbell County
Airport Authority, Industrial Development Authority, and Economic Development Commission.
The department provides staff support to these organizations and assists the Economic
Development Commission in its role as a steering committee during comprehensive economic
development strategy work. Industrial incentive programs were discussed, including incentives
for businesses making significant taxable capital investments in real estate or personal property.
Ms. Rezai reported that, as actual investment figures have replaced earlier forecasts, the
cumulative increase in revenue associated with incentivized projects from Fiscal Year 2021 to
Fiscal Year 2025 had grown from approximately $11 million reported previously to approximately
$18 million. She noted that businesses have, in many cases, exceeded the investment levels
originally anticipated when incentives were awarded.
Tourism and marketing efforts were also reviewed. The department distributes a “Shop
Small, Dine Local” brochure through hotels in the Lynchburg/Wards Road area, maintains an
outdoor guide highlighting Campbell County attractions, and places tourism information at
welcome centers. The department also participates in advertising through Virginia travel
publications and Blue Ridge Outdoors, emphasizing Campbell County’s outdoor recreation,
fishing, and river access. Communications efforts include active social media accounts and a
monthly newsletter with approximately 1,300 subscribers. The department also uses direct mail
and electronic communications to inform property owners of opportunities under the commercial
and industrial tax rehabilitation program.
Ms. Rezai discussed efforts to market County-owned property and attract new businesses
and residents. Property listings are tracked for advertising analytics, and she reported that the
department was transitioning its property listings to another platform because of increased activity
and better analytics. The department also participates in regional marketing initiatives, Lynchburg
Regional Business Alliance activities, travel publications, and relocation marketing. Current
projects include the County’s new branding and gateway signs, continued work at Seneca
Commerce Park, and a grocery-store feasibility study involving another County-owned property.
//

HIGHWAY MATTERS

Daniel Brown, VDOT Assistant Residency Engineer, was present to answer questions from
Board members.
In a report on previous highway matters, Mr. Brown stated the following:









Supervisor Hardie had noted the pavement was breaking up at the intersection of Wards
Road and Lynbrook Road. VDOT planned to patch the pavement as the schedule allowed.
Supervisor Hardie had requested that the brush that was blocking sight distance at the
intersection of Lynch Mill Road and Dearing Ford Road be removed. Mr. Brown noted
that the brush had been cut.
Supervisor Watts had asked for pavement improvements on Theta Mill Road and in the
vicinity of 1400 Dearborn Road. VDOT had applied shoulder stone on Dearborn Road and
would patch the pavement on Theta Mill Road as the schedule allowed.
Chairman Lawton had indicated there was a pothole on Peerman School Road. Mr. Brown
noted that it had been fixed.
Chairman Lawton had inquired about the schedule for improvements on Lynch Mill Road
near Bedford Avenue. Mr. Brown noted the improvements were completed on July 17.
Supervisor Cline had requested that trees affecting the sight line on Crews Shop Road,
specifically near Doss Road, be trimmed. Mr. Brown noted this was completed.

From the Board:





Supervisor Hardie indicated that repairs were needed along the southern section of
Wisecarver Road due to deteriorating asphalt in the center of the road. Ruts were forming
along the shoulder of the road, and he requested that gravel be added, especially near the
intersection of Colonial Highway and Calohan Road.
Supervisor Hardie indicated that asphalt on Long Island Road near Mohawk Road was
deteriorating.
Supervisor Hardie noted that the entrance to Long Island Park needs improvement. Mr.
Isenhour noted that part of the entrance was an easement owned by the railroad. County










staff was working with the railroad to transfer the entire entrance over to the State to allow
it to become a VDOT-maintained road.
Chairman Lawton indicated that Riverbend Road had an issue with trucks on the roadway.
County staff relocated a street name sign in conjunction with VDOT installing signage for
truck routing and weight restrictions.
Chairman Lawton noted that orange pipes in the ground along the shoulder of River Road
were left behind from broadband installation.
Supervisor Cline requested an update regarding the timeframe for the intersection warning
system at the intersection of Route 460 and Doss Road. Mr. Brown commented that the
design and installation of the system will take 18 to 30 months. Regular flashing lights
have been ordered in the meantime.
Supervisor Dowdy inquired if residents could purchase flashing speed limit signs.
Supervisor Dowdy noted congestion issues on westbound Leesville Road due to the
significant number of turning vehicles at the intersection of Waterlick Road.
Supervisor Dowdy requested updated speed data for Wildwood Road.

On behalf of VDOT, Mr. Brown congratulated Mr. Tweedy on his retirement and thanked
him for his partnership over the years.
//

RESOLUTION – RURAL RUSTIC ROAD PROGRAM

VDOT requested that Route 762 (Tip Lane) in the Brookneal Election District, from Route
646 to the dead end, be designated as a Rural Rustic Road. The Rural Rustic Road program
allowed for the paving of roads currently in the state system of secondary highways and maintained
by VDOT. Under the Rural Rustic Road program, VDOT paves roads along the existing rightof-way with minimal improvement. Tip Lane was located in a low-density development area and
had no more than 1,500 vehicles per day. The County was unaware of pending development that
would significantly affect the existing traffic on this road.
On motion of Supervisor Watts, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors adopts the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Section 33.2-332 of the Code of Virginia permits the hard surfacing of certain
unpaved roads deemed to qualify for designation as a Rural Rustic Road; and
WHEREAS, any such road must be located in a low-density development area and be
traversed by no more than 1,500 vehicles per day; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Campbell County, Virginia (“Board”) wishes to
have Route 762 (Tip Lane), From: Route 646 To: Dead End (“Road”) designated a Rural Rustic
Road; and
WHEREAS, the Board is unaware of pending development that will significantly affect
the existing traffic on this road; and
WHEREAS, the Board believes that this road should be designated a Rural Rustic due to
its qualifying characteristics; and
WHEREAS, this road is in the Board’s six-year plan for improvements to the secondary
system of state highways.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board hereby designates Route 762
Tip Lane, as a Rural Rustic Road, and requests that the Residency Administrator for the Virginia
Department of Transportation concur in this designation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board requests that this road be hard surfaced
and, to the fullest extent feasible, be improved within the existing right-of-way and ditch-lines to
preserve as much as possible the adjacent trees, vegetation, side slopes, and rural rustic character
along the road in their current state.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Virginia Department of Transportation Residency Administrator.
The vote was: Aye: Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
Nay: None
Absent: None
//

PUBLIC HEARING – SPRING CODE UPDATE

Mr. Isenhour indicated that semi-annually the Board of Supervisors updates the Code of
Campbell County with mandated changes that result from action of the General Assembly and
discretionary changes that are initiated by either the Board or staff during the year. A large portion
of the changes in this code update relate to significant required changes imposed upon zoning by
the acts of the General Assembly. On June 22, 2026, the Planning Commission considered the
proposed changes to Chapter 22 and voted unanimously to approve those changes.
Chairman Lawton opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m.
No one spoke in favor of or in opposition to the code update, and the public hearing was
closed at 7:20 p.m.
On motion of Chairman Lawton, it was ORDAINED the Board of Supervisors accepts the
amendments to the Campbell County Code as follows:
CHAPTER 1 – General Provisions.
No changes.
CHAPTER 2 – Administration.
No changes.
CHAPTER 3 – Amusements.
No changes.
CHAPTER 4 – Animals and Fowl.
No changes.
CHAPTER 5 – Buildings.
No changes.
CHAPTER 6 – Cemeteries.
No changes.
CHAPTER 7 – Elections.
No changes.
CHAPTER 8 – Erosion/Sedimentation, Stormwater Management.
§8-3
Increases from $1,000 to $32,500 the maximum civil penalty for a violation
of a component of any Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Program,
updates to reference updated State fee schedule. MANDATORY – pursuant
to change in state Code made by HB1350.
§8-9

Increases from $1,000 to $32,500 the maximum civil penalty for a violation
of a component of any Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Program.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB1350.

§8-13

Updates Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Program/Stormwater
Management Program fee schedule to reference updated State fee schedule.
MANDATORY – pursuant to changes to 9VAC25-875-1400.

CHAPTER 9 – Finance and Taxation.

§9-1.1

Amends the bad check section to incorporate language related to electronic
drafts. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by
HB508/899/SB340.

§9-1.4

Provides for rounding procedures in certain cash transactions. Part
MANDATORY, part DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to change in state
Code made by HB954.

CHAPTER 10 – Public Safety
No changes.
CHAPTER 11 – Floodplain Management
No changes.
CHAPTER 12 – Garbage, Refuse and Weeds.
No changes.
CHAPTER 13 – Health and Sanitation.
No changes.
CHAPTER 14 – Licenses and Permits.
§14-52
Adds new section 14-52 designated Mandatory display of credentials to
require door-to-door vendors to display County-issued badge with photo ID
and description of their line of work while engaged as door-to-door vendors.
DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to joint request from Commissioner of
Revenue and Sheriff’s office to advance public safety.
§14-55

Amends to make consistent with change to section 14-52.
DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to joint request from Commissioner of
Revenue and Sheriff’s office to advance public safety.

CHAPTER 15 – Motor Vehicles
§15-13
Extends the vehicle registration fees for disabled veterans or their
unremarried surviving spouse to vehicles displaying a standard passenger
license plate. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by
HB94.
CHAPTER 16 – Offenses, Miscellaneous
No changes.
CHAPTER 17 - Personnel
No changes.
CHAPTER 18 - Utilities
No changes.
CHAPTER 20 – Cable Television
No changes.
CHAPTER 21 – Subdivision of Land
No changes.
CHAPTER 22 – Zoning
§22-2(B)(1)
Adds the definition of Abortion. DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to Board
Direction from March 17, 2026 work session.
§22-2(B)(2)

Adds the definition of Abortion facility. DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to
Board Direction from March 17, 2026 work session.

§22-2(B)(10)

Adds the definition of Agrivoltaics. MANDATORY – pursuant to change
in state Code made by HB508/899/SB340.

§22-2(B)(21)

Amends to promote clarity and consistency in administration of buffering
and screening requirements. DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to request from
Community Development office.

§22-2(B)(70)

Amend the definition of Hospital. DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to Board
Direction from March 17, 2026 work session.

§22-2(B)(82)

Amends definition of Lot to promote clarity and consistency in
administration. DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to request from Community
Development office.

§22-2(B)(92)

Removes the restriction prohibiting manufactured homes as accessory uses.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB655/SB346.

§22-2(B)(96)

Adds the definition of Medical or dental clinics. DISCRETIONARY –
pursuant to Board Direction from March 17, 2026 work session.

§22-2(B)(154)

Adds the definition of Small Portable Solar Generation Device.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB395.

§22-7

Adds language clarifying the application of vested rights following court
decisions. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by
SB504.

§22-8(C)(4)

Adds language specifically allowing manufactured homes to the same
extent as site built homes are allowed. MANDATORY – pursuant to change
in state Code made by HB655/SB346.

§22-9(A)(10)

Adds language specifically allowing manufactured homes attached to realty
to the same extent as site built homes are allowed. MANDATORY –
pursuant to change in state Code made by HB655/SB346.

§22-10(A)(4)

Adds language specifically allowing manufactured homes attached to realty
to the same extent as site built homes are allowed. MANDATORY –
pursuant to change in state Code made by HB655/SB346.

§22-11

Amends former Residential – Manufactured Housing to be designated
Residential - Dense Urban Zoning District (R-DU). Current law requires
one zoning district which allows for single family homes to be built on lots
not exceeding 3,000 sq. ft. with minimum lot widths not exceeding 30 feet.
Former R-MH is the most administratively appropriate district to amend to
conform to requirements of law. Amendments generally conform district to
allow small lots when public utilities are present. All references to former
R-MH amended throughout. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state
Code made by HB1212.

§22-12.1(A)(52)

Adds Abortion facility as a special use permit only use in Business-General
Commercial. DISCRETIONARY – pursuant to Board Direction from
March 17, 2026 work session.

§22-17

Redesignated former §22-17 as §22-17:1 to align with the addition of §2217:2.

§22-17:2

Adds new section reducing the number of mandatory parking spaces in
areas with access to public transportation. MANDATORY – pursuant to
change in state Code made by HB888.

§22-17.1

Redesignated former §22-17.1 as §22-17.1:1 to align with the renumbering
of §22-17.1:1 to §22-17.1:2. DISCRETIONARY – adds language requested
by staff to limit the use of temporary buildings to the parcel or project under
construction.

§22-17

Redesignated former §22-17 as §22-17:1 to align with the addition of §2217:2.

§22-17.11

Adds the definitions of Base station and Temporary support structure to the
section addressing Telecommunication Antennas and Towers.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB876.

§22-17.14:1

Adds new section designated Wireless facility modifications.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB277.

§22-17.14:2

Adds new section designated Temporary support structures.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB876.

§22-17.24(D)(3)

Rewrites language concerning requirements for solar decommissioning
bonds. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by
HB711/SB347.

§22-17.25

Rewrites a number of standards for solar project requirements, including
setbacks, impacts on scenic ways and parks, fencing, and lighting. Adds
subsections on wildlife passages and land disturbance requirements.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB711/SB347.

§22-17.29

Adds new section designated Local regulation of solar facilities and small
portable solar generation devices. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in
state Code made by HB395.

§22-17.30

Adds new section designated Installation of small portable solar generation
devices in rental homes. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code
made by HB395.

§22-17.31

Adds new section designated Battery energy storage projects as permitted
accessory use to approved solar projects. MANDATORY – pursuant to
change in state Code made by HB891/SB443.

§22-17.32

Adds new section designated Reporting to State Corporation Commission.
MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state Code made by HB711/SB347.

§22-17.33

Adds new section designated High Energy Use Facilities. MANDATORY
– pursuant to change in state Code made by HB153/HB511/SB94/SB130.

§22-30

Re-writes the language related to appeals to the Circuit Court from the
Board of Zoning appeals. MANDATORY – pursuant to change in state
Code made by HB198.

The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

//

PUBLIC HEARING – COUNTYWIDE REZONING

PL-26-132

Due to new legislation from the General Assembly that allows manufactured
housing in all residential districts and that jurisdictions have at least one zoning
district that allows parcels with a 3,000 sq. ft. lot size, staff is recommending the
existing Residential – Manufactured Housing (R-MH) zoning district be updated
to reflect these changes. This is a concurrent rezoning request to reflect the
proposed changes to Chapter 22 – Zoning.

Kate Reusch, Planner, indicated there are currently 155 parcels containing approximately
1,012.649 +/- acres zoned either R-MH or R-MH, C. The proposed rezoning would be
countywide; a summary of changes by election district is below:
•

Altavista: 9 parcels 16.231 +/- acres

•
•
•
•
•
•

Brookneal: 6 parcels 17.863 +/- acres
Concord: 89 parcels 514.099 +/- acres
Rustburg: 17 parcels 260.224 +/- acres
Spring Hill: 4 parcels 22.999 +/- acres
Sunburst: 29 parcels 174.973 +/- acres
Timberlake: 1 parcel 6.26 +/- acres

Ms. Reusch stated that, if approved, the affected parcels will be rezoned to Residential –
Dense Urban (R-DU) or Residential – Dense Urban, Conditional (R-DU, C), as applicable.
Because this change is administrative in nature, any existing proffered conditions on a property
will remain in effect and will not be altered by this rezoning. In accordance with the Code of
Virginia Section 15.2-2204, all affected property owners were notified by mail of the rezoning
request. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request by a vote of 7-0.
Chairman Lawton opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m.
No one spoke in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning request, and the public hearing
was closed at 7:22 p.m.
On motion of Supervisor Watts, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors accepts the
recommendation of the Planning Commission and APPROVES Request #PL-26-132 by
Campbell County to rezone the following parcels currently zoned Residential – Manufactured
Housing to Residential – Dense Urban, pursuant to a change in the Campbell County Code
renaming and significantly amending the former Residential – Manufactured Housing zone:
8-5-4A; 8-5-4B; 9-A-1A; 9-A-49B; 9-A-49B1; 9B-1-2; 9B-1-3A; 9B-1-3B; 9B-1-4; 9B1-5; 9B-1-6; 9B-1-7; 9B-1-8; 9B-1-9; 9B-1-10; 9B-1-11; 9B-1-12; 9B-1-13; 9B-1-14; 9B-1-15;
9B-1-16; 9B-1-17; 9B-1-18; 9B-1-19; 9B-1-20; 9B-1-21; 9B-1-22; 9B-1-23; 9B-1-24; 9B-1-25;
9B-1-26; 9B-1-27; 9B-1-28; 9B-1-28A; 9B-1-29; 9B-1-30; 9B-1-31; 9B-1-32; 9B-1-33; 9B-1-35;
9B-1-36A; 9B-1-36B; 9B-1-37; 9B-1-37B; 9B-1-38; 9B-1-39; 9B-1-40; 9B-1-41; 9B-1-42A;
9B-1-42B; 9B-1-43; 9B-1-44; 9B-1-45; 9B-1-46; 9B-1-47; 9B-1-48; 9B-1-49; 9B-1-50; 9B-1-51;
9B-1-52; 9B-1-53; 9B-1-54; 9B-1-55; 9B-1-56; 9B-1-57; 9B-1-58; 9B-1-59; 9B-2-1; 9B-2-56;
9B-2-57; 15-3-2; 15-A-45; 15-A-45A; 15-A-45B; 15-A-49; 15A-11-72; 15B-A-1; 15B-A-6A;
15B-A-6B; 15B-A-6B1; 15B-A-7; 15B-A-8; 20-A-36; 20-A-81; 20-A-85; 20-A-87A; 20T-1-1A;
20T-1-2; 20T-1-3; 20T-1-4; 20T-1-5; 20T-1-6; 20T-1-7; 20T-1-8; 20T-1-9; 20T-1-10; 20T-1-11;
20T-1-12; 20T-1-13; 20T-1-14; 20T-1-15; 20T-1-16; 20T-1-17; 20T-1-18; 20T-1-19; 20T-1-20;
20T-1-21; 20T-1-22; 21-A-48E; 21-A-83; 21-A-83A; 21-A-98; 21-A-156; 23-A-103; 23-A-105;
23-A-106; 23-A-110A; 23B-1; 23-13-27; 23-13-28; 24-A-1; 24-A-20A; 24D-1-1; 24D-1-2; 327-6; 32-A-159; 33-5-3; 33-5-4; 33-A-8; 33-A-8A1; 33-A-64; 33D-1-6; 33D-1-7; 34A-8-52; 34A8-52B; 35-A-58; 35-A-60B1; 40-3-4; 40-3-4A; 40-40-A-27; 41-3-B2; 41-A-55; 41-A-55A; 41A-84; 42-A-64B; 43-A-11; 43A-6-5; 55-A-111A; 56-A-34; 70-A-11; 74-A-6A; 74-A-8; 74-A-8A;
88-A-1C; 92A-1-6.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

PUBLIC HEARING – UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE FOR ONE-TIME BONUS

Mr. Isenhour indicated that in this year’s State budget, the Virginia General Assembly
provided in its 2026 General Session legislation for the payment of a bonus of 2.0% of annual pay
to certain full-time employees.
Virginia Code Section 15.2-1508 requires that bonuses paid outside the normal salary
process be enacted by special ordinance, following the publication of notice of a public hearing.
Administrator Rogers discussed the fact that the state funding would not cover all county
employees because not all county employees are state-funded, meaning the county would have a
local financial component. He estimated the local contribution at approximately $285,000.
Chairman Lawton opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m.

No one spoke in favor of or in opposition to the proposed one-time bonus, and the public
hearing was closed at 7:25 p.m.
On motion of Supervisor Cline, it was ORDAINED the Board of Supervisors accepts the
amendment to the Campbell County Code as follows:
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE TO EFFECT A PAYMENT OF A
BONUS FOR FULL TIME EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the Virginia General Assembly provided in its 2026 General Session
legislation for the payment of a bonus of 2.0% of annual pay to certain full-time employees, and
WHEREAS, the legislation provides that the bonus shall be paid by the locality wherein
the employees work, and reimbursed by payment from the State Treasurer upon receipt of proof
of payment, and
WHEREAS, Virginia Code Section 15.2-1508 requires that bonuses paid outside the
normal salary process be enacted by special ordinance, following the publication of notice of a
public hearing.
THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED pursuant to Section 15.2-1427 of the Code of
Virginia; the following uncodified ordinance is ADOPTED by the Campbell County Board of
Supervisors:
1.

Pursuant to Item 469 Y.1, Chapter 725 of the 2026 Virginia Acts of Assembly as
amended, Campbell County shall, by September 30, 2026, process and pay a bonus
of 2.0% of FY 2026 salary for all full-time employees of Campbell County, of the
Campbell County Constitutional Officers, of the Campbell County General
Registrar’s Office, of the Campbell County Health Department, and of the
Campbell County Department of Social Services.

2.

In calculating the bonuses to be paid, the Campbell County Management Services
Department shall follow the guidance produced by the Virginia Department of
Human Resource Management entitled: “FY27 Compensation Changes Authorized
by Chapter 725, 2026 Acts of Assembly.”

3.

County Staff shall compile a true statement of all amounts paid and the basis
therefore and place the same in the records of the Campbell County Management
Services Department.

4.

A true copy of this uncodified ordinance as well as the statement of all amounts
paid and the basis therefore shall be provided to the State Treasurer and all other
required departments as may be needed for reimbursement purposes.

The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

PUBLIC HEARING – EASEMENT FOR AEP

Mr. Isenhour stated that Appalachian Electric Power approached County staff about an
easement for relocating a number of power poles along or near Bear Creek Road on a parcel of
property owned by Campbell County. The proposed easement would provide a benefit to both the
County and neighboring landowners. Prior to selling or granting any interest on or to any County
property, state code requires that the County conduct a public hearing to receive citizen input. In
answer to a question from Supervisor Hardie, Mr. Isenhour indicated that notice to adjoining
property owners was not required because this was not a zoning matter. Supervisor Hardie
suggested that the County notify adjoining property owners of public hearings of this nature in the
future. Mr. Isenhour indicated that if the Board reached consensus to do that, the matter could be
considered during the fall code update. Administrator Rogers suggested that staff prepare
information for the Board’s review regarding legal requirements and additional options the Board
may have for public hearing notices. Supervisor Watts did not think additional information was

necessary, noting that state code only required this public hearing because the easement would be
on a parcel owned by the County.
Chairman Lawton opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m.
Rob Mann, AEP External Affairs Manager, stated that the project was intended to improve
reliability in the area, where customers had experienced several lengthy outages caused in part by
difficult terrain and limited access to existing facilities. He reported recent outages lasting
approximately 9 ½ hours affecting 132 customers, another outage lasting approximately 12 hours
affecting 90 customers, and several additional outages in 2025, including outages lasting more
than a full day. The proposed project would connect to an existing three-phase line along Village
Highway and cross County property, ultimately improving service to more than 200 customers,
including an area where approximately 30 additional homes are expected.
Glenn Reichard, 332 Bear Creek Road, Rustburg, asked questions regarding the location
of the proposed line, tree trimming, and whether alternatives could reduce the impact on his
property. He preferred that the line be located across the road or underground if feasible in order
to minimize impacts on existing trees. Mr. Mann explained that routing the line across the road
would involve additional property owners and additional clearing, while underground construction
would require additional equipment and substantially increase the cost. He stated that the proposed
above-ground route was more cost-effective but indicated that AEP would work with the property
owner regarding trimming and potential buffering. Mr. Mann clarified that the County easement
would not eliminate Mr. Reichard’s separate rights regarding any easement needed on his own
property.
Hearing no further comment, the public hearing was closed at 7:42 p.m.
On motion of Supervisor Hardie, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors approves the
disposal of property owned by Campbell County, specifically tax map parcel 25-A-21B, through
easement, the recipient of the easement being Appalachian Power Company.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

ALTAVISTA COMBINED SCHOOL PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS

Mr. Tweedy guided the Board through a discussion regarding the proposed renovation of
Altavista Combined School. He reported on the work of an ad hoc committee consisting of two
members of the Board of Supervisors and two members of the School Board. The committee
reviewed potential procurement methods and estimated project costs. The committee
recommended using the Construction Management procurement method rather than the traditional
design-bid-build process. Under this approach, the County would first hire an architectural firm
that would work directly for the County to develop the design. A construction manager would
then be selected through a qualifications-based process and brought into the project early to
provide cost estimates, scheduling assistance, and engineering throughout the design phase. Mr.
Tweedy explained that this approach would allow the County to benefit from construction
expertise before final plans are completed while maintaining the architect's independence and
responsibility to the County as the owner.
Regarding the project's estimated budget, Mr. Tweedy explained that the committee was
recommending a total project budget of approximately $43 million, with roughly $40 million
allocated for construction and the remaining funds covering architectural and engineering services,
testing, permits, furnishings, contingencies, and other soft costs associated with a project of this
magnitude. He emphasized that these figures were derived from the recently completed facility
assessment and were not arbitrary estimates. The assessment evaluated the condition of the
building's mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, and educational components and identified
the improvements necessary to modernize the school while extending its useful life.
Supervisor Watts questioned whether investing such a significant amount in an existing
building was the best long-term decision or whether the County should instead consider
constructing an entirely new high school. Mr. Tweedy responded that while a new facility would

provide greater design flexibility, current construction costs would likely place a new high school
well above $100 million, depending on site development, infrastructure improvements, and the
overall scope of the project. Mr. Tweedy also noted that constructing a new school would require
acquiring additional property, extending utilities, constructing access roads, and maintaining
operations at the existing school until the new facility was complete. Those additional expenses
made renovation a substantially more affordable option.
Supervisor Carwile and Supervisor Watts expressed concern about establishing a budget
before an architect had completed a detailed design. Mr. Tweedy explained that under the
Construction Management process, establishing a target budget at the outset is an essential step
because it gives both the architect and construction manager a clear financial framework within
which to design the project. Rather than designing an ideal project and determining its cost
afterward, the design team develops plans that fit within the Board's established budget. He
emphasized that the facility study serves as a roadmap, identifying priorities while recognizing
that some decisions regarding finishes, layouts, and specific improvements will be refined during
the design process. If costs begin to exceed the budget, the construction manager and architect can
recommend adjustments before construction documents are finalized.
On motion of Chairman Lawton, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors authorizes staff
to proceed with the following steps for the Altavista Combined School renovation project:
1. Authorize proceeding with the renovations to Altavista Combined School and borrowing
$45 million to fund the renovations.
2. The Board of Supervisors approves Construction Management as the method of procuring
the project because it provides better control over the process since the architect works
directly for the owner. All the reasons for this recommendation are described in detail in
the attached justification letter from Michael Mauceri.
3. Agree that the current RRMM contract be extended to use them as the design firm for the
project, working for the Schools and the County. This would save three (3) months of
time since an RFP and selection proceed would be omitted in selecting an architect for the
project. The three months saved should allow the project to start next summer, resulting
in inflation savings of up to a year, since three summers are needed to complete the
renovations.
4. Based on the attached recommendation letter from Michael Mauceri, the Board of
Supervisors supports the County Administrator’s documenting that "for the specific
construction project, (i) an Alternate Contract Structure is more advantageous than a
competitive-sealed-bid construction contract; (ii) there is a benefit to the County by using
an Alternate Contract Structure; and (iii) competitive sealed bidding is not practical or
fiscally advantageous. Authorize the County Administrator to sign this justification and
retain it in the County construction files for the project.”
5. Authorize a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) of construction firms to collaborate with the
Schools and RRMM to design and renovate ACS.
6. Authorize the Schools to apply for grant funding from the State to assist with funding the
renovations to ACS. The deadline for applications is July 27th. If an application is not
submitted by the 27th, the next opportunity is July 2027.
7. Authorize the County to proceed with topographical surveying, utility and hazardous
material testing. Authorize an appropriation for this preliminary work that will be
reimbursed from future loan funds.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

PUBLIC SAFETY STATION #1 GRADING CONSIDERATIONS

Mr. Tweedy next discussed preliminary grading work associated with a potential public
safety/EMS facility near the intersection of Routes 24 and 29. He reported that a topographic
survey had been completed and could be used for the project regardless of when construction
ultimately proceeded. A preliminary grading plan indicated that the proposed facility could fit on
the site while coordinating with the adjacent Augusta Springs development. The Board discussed
whether grading should be completed in advance so that it could coordinate with the Augusta
Springs development or whether grading should be incorporated into the eventual construction

contract. Mr. Tweedy explained that either approach was feasible, with the main consideration
being whether the Board wanted to proceed now and obtain pricing or wait until the building design
was finalized.
On motion of Supervisor Cline, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors authorizes staff
to coordinate grading activities with the adjacent Augusta Springs development, finalize the
preliminary grading plan in coordination with the developer’s engineer, and obtain bids for site
grading.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
Abstain:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton
None
None
Watts

FUNDING REQUEST – MASTER GOVERNMENTAL DEPUTY TREASURERS

Administrator Rogers asked the Board to consider a funding request from the Treasurer’s
Office concerning employees who had completed the Master Governmental Deputy Treasurer
(MGDT) certification program. He explained that constitutional officers receive certain state
funding through the Compensation Board and that certified deputy treasurers become eligible for
a 9.3 percent salary increase from the state. However, state funding does not necessarily become
available immediately when an employee completes the certification. The Treasurer’s Office
requested that the County temporarily fund the salary increases for two certified employees until
the state funding becomes available. The estimated additional compensation cost was
approximately $10,000 for the two employees.
Abigail Robertson, Chief Deputy Treasurer, provided additional information about the
certification program, explaining that it requires extensive coursework, examinations, experience,
and continuing education. The Treasurer’s Office had four employees who had completed the
certification, although only three remained with the office, and only one was currently receiving
the state-funded increase. The certification program includes training in areas such as
governmental customer service, bankruptcy, ethics, delinquent collections, internal controls,
governmental accounting, cash management, cybersecurity, taxpayer information protection,
leadership, internal reporting, and other responsibilities specific to governmental treasury
operations. She explained that the state Compensation Board had limited funding available for
certified positions and that employees were being placed on a waiting list based upon eligibility
and certification dates.
Board members questioned how the County would administer the temporary salary
adjustments and whether appropriate safeguards existed to ensure the increases would end once
state funding became available. Administrator Rogers explained that the County already tracks
employee pay ranges, certifications, and compensation adjustments as part of its normal personnel
processes. If the Board approved the request, the status of the employees' state-funded positions
would be monitored, and the local supplement would be removed or adjusted once the
Compensation Board began funding the salary increase. He also clarified that starting salaries and
budgeted compensation are managed separately, and employee compensation is based upon skills,
qualifications, and experience rather than simply matching a predecessor's salary.
Supervisors then engaged in an extensive policy discussion regarding whether the county
should assume what they viewed as a state financial obligation. Supervisor Cline expressed
frustration that employees who had fulfilled all certification requirements were not receiving the
compensation promised under the state program because of delays in state funding. He questioned
whether it was appropriate for the County to fill a gap created by insufficient state appropriations.
Ms. Robertson explained that many localities were temporarily supplementing state-funded
compensation and that the state appeared to be working toward increasing the number of certified
positions it funds. Supervisor Carwile remarked that while the employees deserved the
compensation, he was reluctant to establish a precedent whereby the County routinely assumed
responsibilities that properly belonged to the state.
Administrator Rogers advised the Board that if members wished to avoid creating a broad
precedent, they could narrowly tailor any action to the two employees who had already completed
the certification under the current circumstances. He explained that the Board could recognize

these employees for completing the certification and waiting an extended period for state funding,
while expressly stating that future requests would be considered individually rather than
automatically approved. This approach would allow the County to reward the employees'
achievement without committing itself to funding future state obligations.
On motion of Supervisor Cline, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors authorizes the
9.3% increase in pay for the two Treasurer’s Office employees who had completed the MGDT
certification, at a total cost of $10,227.00, not to apply to any other positions or employees, as
future requests would be considered separately as circumstances arose.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

CONSENT AGENDA

On motion of Supervisor Carwile, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors approves the
following under the Consent Agenda:
a)

Appropriations –

1.

Solid Waste Fund, Recycling/Litter Commission, appropriating $7,250 to Household
Hazardous Waste Days; decreases Beginning Fund Balance by $7,250; to help offset the
cost of the annual Household Hazardous Waste Days with the City of Lynchburg. The
event was held on April 12, 2026. The County had not participated in the event since
October 2022, therefore, the FY26 budget was insufficient by $7,250. The cost to
participate was $10,299.01;

2.

General Fund, Library Administration, appropriating $9,798 to Books & Subscriptions;
increases Library State Aid revenue by $9,798; the estimate for FY26 State Aid at the time
of budget submission was lower than the funds ultimately appropriated by the General
Assembly. The supplemental appropriation reflects the additional funds granted to CCPLS.
Note: State Aid funding for libraries has stipulations on what it can be used for; examples
include: materials for the collection, continuing education opportunities for library staff,
book processing materials, and furniture for use by the public. In this case, the additional
funds will be used for materials for the collection;

3.

General Fund, Commonwealth’s Attorney, appropriating $6,150 to Other Professional
Services; decreases Beginning Fund Balance by $6,150; funds requested to true up the line;

4.

General Fund, E-911 System, appropriating $55 to Maint/Repair – Communications Equip;
increases VITA Educational Grant revenue by $55; grand funds for costs associated with
E911 phone replacement;

5.

Capital Improvement Fund, Sheriff’s Department, appropriating $12,539.75 to Vehicles &
Equipment; increases Insurance Recoveries revenue by $12,539.75; to purchase
replacement vehicle equipment using funds received from insurance companies from
Sheriff’s Office fleet automobile accidents that occurred;

6.

General Fund, Sheriff’s Department, appropriating $4,871 to Cash Held in Evidence;
increases Cash Held in Evidence – Sheriff revenue by $4,871; revenue received as evidence
that is deposited and moved over to an expenditure line to be returned to the rightful owner,
sent to unclaimed property, or DCJS as a forfeiture;

7.

General Fund, Sheriff’s Department, appropriating $517.95 to Special Investigation Fees;
increases Special Investigations Restitution revenue by $517.95; defendants are ordered
through Circuit Court to reimburse the Sheriff’s Office for the narcotic funds used by the
Sheriff’s Office in their case;

8.

General Fund, Sheriff’s Department, appropriating $300 to Animal Care Supplies and $750
to Project Lifesaver Supplies; increases Gifts & Donations – Sheriff’s Office revenue by
$1,050; funds received as donations from citizens for animal care and Project Lifesaver;

9.

General Fund, Sheriff’s Department, appropriating $882.69 to Central VA Task Force
Equipment; increases Central VA Task Force Equipment revenue by $882.69; revenue
received from DCJS Asset Forfeitures Division from the Central VA Task Force cases to
be used to purchase equipment for the task force;

10.

General Fund, Bulletproof Vest Partnership, appropriating $4,911.83 to Law Enforcement
Equipment – Vest; increases Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant revenue by $4,911.83;
funding will be used to help purchase replacement and new bulletproof vests for the
department. The grant will cover half of the cost of each vest purchased. The additional
expense of each vest is already included in the County budget. The grant will expire on
8/31/28;

11.

General Fund, Sheriff’s Department, appropriating $23,444 to Police Equipment/Supplies
Donations; increases Sale of Salvage & Surplus Property revenue by $23,444; funds
received from selling the Grizzly armored vehicle on GovDeals for $45,056.25. The
Sheriff’s Office is requesting permission to use some of the funds for maintenance,
including paint, decals, and tires, for a total of $10,100 for the new BearCat armored
vehicle purchase from LPD. Also requesting additional equipment for the Special
Response Team, including helmets, ballistic plates, boots, and uniforms, totaling $13,344.
The request is for $23,444 to be placed in the Police Equipment line. This will make the
current armored vehicle fully operational and capable of supporting tactical operations,
high-risk warrant service, barricaded subjects, hostage incidents, and officer rescue
missions;

12.

General Fund, Sheriff’s Department, appropriating 940.74 to Sheriff’s Office Levy;
increases Sheriff’s Office – Levy revenue by $940.74; to move levy revenue to an
expenditure line and pay the plaintiff the funds collected on the levy;

13.

General Fund, Economic Development, appropriating $202.50 to Brookneal/Campbell
County Airport Authority; increases Sale of Salvage & Surplus Property revenue by
$202.50; transfer requested to reimburse the Brookneal/Campbell County Airport
Authority for the sale of outdated lighting globes on GovDeals;

14.

General Fund, Economic Development, appropriating $151.88 to Office Supplies; increase
Sale of Salvage & Surplus Property revenue by $151.88; transfer requested to reimburse
the office supplies line for the sale of surplus printer toner on GovDeals;

15.

General Fund, Social Services Admin, appropriating $85,000 to Legal Services; increases
Public Assistance/Admin – State revenue by $17,850, increases Public Assistance/Admin
– Federal revenue by $46,750, and decreases Beginning Fund Balance by $20,400; funds
requested due to increase in the representation of DSS in court and administrative
proceedings involving children and families;

16.

General Fund, Public Assistance Services, appropriating $200,800 to IV-E Adoption
Subsidy; increases Public Assistance/Admin – Federal revenue by $105,861.76 and
increases Public Assistance/Admin – State revenue by $94,938.24; Title IV-E Adoption
Subsidy provides payments to facilitate adoptions for approved foster children;

17.

General Fund, Public Assistance Services, appropriating $39,600 to AFDC-FC; increases
Public Assistance/Admin – Federal revenue by $20,877.12 and increases Public
Assistance/Admin – State revenue by $18,722.88; IV-E Foster Care funds for maintenance
support for eligible children in foster care;

18.

General Fund, Children’s Services Act, appropriating $3,000,000 to CSA; increases
Children at Risk (CAR) Pool revenue by $1,980,000 and decreases Beginning Fund
Balance by $1,020,000; the Children’s Services Act provides services to children and
families that are determined to be troubled/at-risk. It is a mandated sum sufficient program
with local oversight by the Community Policy and Management Team. The
Commonwealth of Virginia reimburses the County for program expenditures at a variable
rate depending on the types of services required in each case, averaging 66% per fiscal
year. The number of children/families served has increased in recent years with

corresponding increases in the number of challenging cases and higher expenditures on
services as provider rates continue to increase. The total expenditure for FY26 will reach
approximately $9,000,000. Total expenditures in FY25 were $7,956,281, and the state
reimbursement was $5,336,967 (67.08%);
19.

Debt Service Fund, Debt Service, appropriating $1,500 to Wilmington Trust Interest
Payments, $220,000 to Principal WTrust Bonds 2023A-BHS, $487,623.11 to Interest
WTrust Bonds 2023A-BHS, $330,000 to Principal WTrust Bonds 2023B-Seneca,
$726,786.89 to Interest WTrust Bonds 2023B-Seneca, and $118,006.52 to Other
Professional Services; decreases Beginning Fund Balance by $1,883,916.52; transfer
necessary to cover funds that were excluded from the FY26 budget, borrowed from
Wilmington Trust and paid for other professional services;

20.

Solid Waste Fund, Landfill Phase III, appropriating $7,123 to Scrap Tire Program;
decreases Beginning Fund Balance by $7,123; necessary to true up the line for the
remainder of FY26. The direct impact of the increase in tonnage of tires and the increase
in cost to haul them has compromised the budgeted amount;

21.

General Fund, Registrar, appropriating $34,807.85 to Comp – Election Officials, $2,750.65
to Postage, $1,490.72 to Telephone, $470.70 to Personal Vehicle Mileage, $1,841.37 to
Travel – Election Officials, $1,281.84 to Office Supplies, $20,292.76 to Ballots & Election
Supplies, and $164.75 to Furniture & Fixtures; decreases Beginning Fund Balance by
$63,100.64; to cover added expenses from the April 2026 Special Election and August
2026 Dual Primary Election that were not anticipated at the time of budget preparation;

22.

General Fund, Gladys Fire Company, appropriating $3,750.43 to Maint/Repair – Vehicles;
increases Insurance Recoveries revenue by $3,750.43; reimbursement for replacement of
fire hose and personal protective gear damaged in a residential structure fire on 4/27/26,
less $1,000 deductible.

b)

County Attorney Invoice –
Approves payment to the County Attorney in the amount of $30,470.99 for services
provided from May 20, 2026, through June 23, 2026.

c)

Grant Resolutions –
Adopts the following resolutions in support of the Virginia Cooperative Extension and
required by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (VDHCD),
and authorizes staff to administer the VDHCD grant for the Campbell County Training
School Complex:
RESOLUTION OF AUTHORIZATION
FY2026 VIRGINIA TOBACCO REGION REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
AGRIBUSINESS GRANT
WHEREAS, Campbell County recognizes the importance of agriculture in the local
economy; and
WHEREAS, the Campbell County Board of Supervisors seeks to improve the
resources available to farmers and producers; and
WHEREAS, the Campbell County Board of Supervisors recognizes that business
planning, marketing, and records management resources are not currently promoted to the
agriculture community; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Campbell County Board of
Supervisors authorizes the submission of an application to the Virginia Tobacco Region
Revitalization Commission.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Administrator and/or his
designee(s) be authorized to act on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, to execute any and

all documents necessary to secure the funding sought through the FY 2026 Virginia
Tobacco Region Revitalization Commission.
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CAMPBELL
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, ADOPTING A POLICY PROHIBITING THE USE OF
EXCESSIVE FORCE AGAINST NON-VIOLENT CIVIL RIGHTS
DEMONSTRATORS
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has passed the Armstrong/Walker
“Excessive Force” Amendment (Section 104 (L)(1) of Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 as amended) prohibiting the use of excessive force
by a local law enforcement agency against any individual engaged in nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, Campbell County has received a Virginia Community Development
Block Grant and is required to comply with the Armstrong/Walker “Excessive Force”
Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the use of excessive force against demonstrators may cause the
County to lose its grant or eligibility for future federal grants;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Campbell
County, Virginia, that:
It is the policy of the County that the use of excessive force is prohibited by local law
enforcement agencies against individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations
within the County.
The County will enforce applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance
to or exit from a facility or location that is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations within the jurisdiction.
d)

Seneca Park Master Planning & Due Diligence RFP
Authorizes staff to negotiate and award the contract to Westwood Professional Services
for Seneca Park Master Planning and Due Diligence, and to execute any required
documents associated with the contract.

The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

APPOINTMENTS
Several appointments were made at this meeting.

Social Services Board
On motion of Supervisor Cline, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors appoints Susan
Jones to the remainder of a four-year term until June 30, 2027, on the Social Services Board for
the Concord Election District.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

On motion of Chairman Lawton, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors reappoints
Morris Dews to the remainder of a four-year term until June 30, 2030, on the Social Services Board
for the Altavista Election District.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None

Absent:

None

Community Policy Management Team
On motion of Chairman Lawton, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors appoints Tomeca
Paige, Youth Services Manager (alternate member); Sasha Garrett, Health Department Nurse
Manager; and Kimberly Foster, Health Department Population Health Manager (alternate
member) to the Community Policy Management Team.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

Brookneal/Campbell County Airport Authority
On motion of Supervisor Hardie, it was resolved the Board of Supervisors reappoints
Carter Elliott to the remainder of a four-year term until January 31, 2029, on the
Brookneal/Campbell County Airport Authority.
The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
//

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None

MATTERS FROM THE BOARD

Supervisor Hardie congratulated Mr. Tweedy on his upcoming retirement and thanked him
for his service to the County.
Supervisor Hardie encouraged everyone to attend the Summer Reading Grand Finale Street
Fair on July 25th.
Supervisor Carwile requested that the Board revisit the County’s relationship with Flock
cameras and related technology. He noted that neighboring localities had recently been reassessing
their use of the technology and suggested that Campbell County review its existing arrangement
and determine whether further discussion was warranted. The Board indicated support for
revisiting the issue at a future meeting with members of the Sheriff’s Office.
Supervisor Watts discussed drought conditions affecting the county and asked staff to
investigate whether state or federal programs, grants, or other assistance may be available to
residents and agricultural operations affected by drought conditions. Administrator Rogers
indicated that staff would coordinate with Cooperative Extension to identify available programs
and report back on potential assistance.
Supervisor Watts congratulated Mr. Tweedy on his retirement and expressed his
appreciation for his dedication to the County.
Supervisor Watts asked the Board to consider whether properties in areas where higherdensity residential development is already permitted should have greater flexibility to develop
smaller single-family residential lots, similar to the flexibility available for manufactured housing.
He asked staff to examine the issue as part of a future code update.
Supervisor Brown congratulated Mr. Tweedy on his retirement.
Supervisor Cline congratulated Mr. Tweedy on his retirement and noted that he would be
sorely missed.
Supervisor Cline discussed the County’s solid waste disposal situation and the status of
efforts to secure agreements with other localities concerning future landfill capacity. He asked for
an update on whether the County had received firm commitments from other localities and
expressed concern that the County needed to begin moving toward a transfer-station solution if
those agreements were not finalized. Administrator Rogers reported that the prior deadline for
receiving signed agreements was July 31, 2026, and that, in the absence of executed agreements,

the County should begin preparing a solicitation for a transfer station. He indicated that an existing
solicitation document could potentially be updated and reissued, while also noting that current
market conditions and pricing would need to be evaluated. The Board expressed consensus that, if
the necessary agreements were not received by the deadline, staff should proceed with the next
steps toward a transfer-station solicitation.
Supervisor Dowdy congratulated Mr. Tweedy on his retirement.
//

ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Supervisor Carwile, the meeting was adjourned at 8:44 p.m.

The vote was: Aye:
Nay:
Absent:

Brown, Carwile, Cline, Dowdy, Hardie, Lawton, Watts
None
None
____________________________________
TOM K. LAWTON, CHAIRMAN
Approved: _________________

Campbell County Board of Supervisors
Campbell County, Virginia
Dear Members of the Campbell County Board of Supervisors,
On behalf of the Virginia Technical Institute (VTI) Board of Directors, I respectfully
request your consideration of a $50,000 grant to support Phase I of VTI's Small
Multifaceted Manufacturing Development Project in Campbell County.
For many years, Campbell County has successfully supported businesses at both ends
of the economic spectrum. The Town of Altavista's Spark Innovation Center has
provided an excellent incubator for entrepreneurs and very small businesses, while
Seneca Park has served the needs of larger manufacturing operations. However, there
remains a significant gap for growing businesses that have outgrown incubator space
but are not yet ready for a large industrial facility.
In 2022, a comprehensive feasibility study identified this gap and confirmed the need for
small-to-medium manufacturing space within our region. This finding has also been
affirmed by the Lynchburg Regional Business Alliance, which recognizes the importance
of creating flexible industrial space to retain and attract growing businesses.
To address this need, a feasibility study was completed that quantified the need and
developed a plan to renovate the unused half of our facility into one to three move-inready manufacturing suites for emerging companies. These spaces will provide
businesses with an affordable opportunity to expand, create jobs, and strengthen the
local economy while remaining in Campbell County.
Recognizing the merit of this initiative, the Virginia Tobacco Region Revitalization
Commission awarded VTI $400,000 in matching grant funds for Phase I of the project.
As a small nonprofit organization, VTI has demonstrated its commitment by dedicating
approximately one-third of its available financial reserves toward the required match. In
addition, all project administration and oversight are being provided as an in-kind
contribution by VTI, ensuring that every grant dollar is invested directly into construction
and facility improvements rather than administrative or overhead expenses.
[I can provide you with the comprehensive application submitted to the VA Tobacco
Commission that outlines the project in more detail.]

The Town of Altavista has also demonstrated its confidence in this project by committing
up to $50,000 in matching funds , contingent upon Campbell County providing a
comparable investment.
Because this project will serve businesses throughout Campbell County and the
surrounding region by creating new opportunities for business growth, job creation, and
economic development, we respectfully ask the Campbell County Board of Supervisors
to consider a $50,000 grant toward this important initiative.
Your investment would leverage private funding, local nonprofit resources, and
municipal support to create a lasting economic asset for our community. Together, we
have an opportunity to bridge a long-recognized gap in our economic development
infrastructure and provide growing manufacturers with the space they need to succeed
without leaving our region.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this request and for your continued
commitment to strengthening Campbell County's economy. We would welcome the
opportunity to discuss the project further or provide any additional information that would
be helpful.
Respectfully,
Lisa Moore
Director
Virginia Technical Institute

MEMORANDUM
To:

Members, Board of Supervisors

Through:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator FJR

From:

Kate N. Reusch, Planner KNR

Subject:

Highway Matters

Date:
August 18, 2026
_________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND:
Each month, staff will prepare this report to update the Board on the status of previously identified
highway issues. Items requiring Board action will be identified in a separate agenda item under
Highway Matters.

DISCUSSION:
Board Matters
No new matters.
Pending Matters
Supervisor Hardie
- Pavement is breaking up at the intersection of Wards Road and Lynbrook Road. The
road has been scheduled to be patched.
- Repairs needed along the southern section of Wisecarver Road due to deteriorating
asphalt in the center of the road. Ruts are forming along the shoulder of the road and
requested that gravel be added, especially near the intersection of Colonial Highway
where the road becomes Calohan Road. Work is scheduled to begin the week of August
10th.
- Long Island Road is detreating near the intersection of Mohawk Road and needs to be
patched.
- Entrance to Long Island Park needs improvement. Part of the entrance is an easement
owned by the railroad. County staff is working with the railroad to transfer the entire
entrance over to the State to allow for it to become a VDOT maintained road.
Supervisor Watts
- Pavement is coming up on Theta Mill Road. Work is scheduled to begin the week of
August 10th.
Supervisor Lawton
- When are the improvements scheduled for Lynch Mill Road near Bedford Avenue.
Improvements were completed on July 17th and the pavement markings are scheduled.

-

-

Riverbend Road has an issue with trucks on the roadway. County staff have relocated
a street name sign in conjunction with VDOT installing signage for truck routing and
weight restrictions.
Orange pipes in the ground along the shoulder of River Road were left behind from
broadband installation.

Supervisor Cline
- Requested that trees affecting the sight line on Crews Shop Road, especially near Doss
Road be trimmed. Trimming along Doss Road and Crews Shop Road has been
completed.
- Requested an update regarding the timeframe for the intersection warning system
located at the intersection of Route 460 and Doss Road. The design and installation of
the system will take 18 to 30 months. Regular flashing lights have been ordered in the
meantime.
Supervisor Dowdy
- Inquired if residents could fund a flashing speed limit sign.
- Congestion issues on westbound Leesville Road due to the significant number of
turning vehicles at the intersection of Waterlick Road.

MEMORANDUM
To:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator FJR

From:

Callie Dombrowski, Finance/Budget Manager, Management Services CMD

Subject:

Consent Agenda – Request for Supplemental and Transfers of Appropriations

Date:

September 1, 2026
___________________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND:

REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR FY26

TO:
FROM:
DATE:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Tracy Fairchild, Director, Public Safety
July 30, 2026

#20260901-01

The following Supplemental Appropriation is requested for FY26:

Category
E-911 System, General Fund
E911 Phone Replacement

Line Item
4-100-031400-9010

Appropriation
New Total

Add
$

14,424.90

$

106,807.59

SOURCE OF FUNDING: Increase VITA Educational Grant revenue, 3-100-024050-0145-033, by $14,424.90.
COMMENTS: Grant funds for costs associated with E911 Phone Replacement.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

TO:
FROM:
DATE:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Whit Clark III, Sheriff
August 25, 2026

#20260901-02

The following Supplemental Appropriation is requested for FY26:

Category
Sheriff's Department, General Fund
Central VA Task Force Equipment

Line Item
4-100-031200-6026

Appropriation
New Total

Add
$

1,473.12

$

6,371.96

SOURCE OF FUNDING: Increase Central VA Task Force Equipment revenue, 3-100-018990-0037-032, by $1,473.12.
COMMENTS: This is revenue received from DCJS Asset Forfeitures Division from the Central VA Task Force cases. These funds
will be used to purchase equipment for the Task Force.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR FY27

TO:
FROM:
DATE:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Whit Clark III, Sheriff
August 18, 2026

#20260901-03

The following Supplemental Appropriation is requested for FY27:

Category
Sheriff's Department, General Fund
J Saunders Memorial

Line Item
4-100-031200-6032

Appropriation
New Total

Add
$

240.00

$

240.00

SOURCE OF FUNDING: Increase Gifts & Donations - Sheriff's Office revenue, 3-100-018990-0020-032, by $240.00.
COMMENTS: Funds received after the Jason Saunders Memorial Car Show as donations.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

TO:
FROM:
DATE:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Whit Clark III, Sheriff
August 18, 2026

#20260901-04

The following Supplemental Appropriation is requested for FY27:

Category
E. Byrne Memorial Jag Grant, General Fund
Law Enforcement Equipment

Line Item
4-100-031752-8118

Appropriation
New Total

Add
$

10,652.00

$

10,652.00

SOURCE OF FUNDING: Increase E. Byrne Justice Grant revenue, 3-100-033010-0036-034, by $10,652.00.
COMMENTS: The Sheriff's Office was awarded a local formula Byrne/JAG Equipment Grant for $10,652.00. This is to replace 21
handguns with new Glock 45s, enhanced with red dot sights. The grant requires no match.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

TO:
FROM:
DATE:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator
Whit Clark III, Sheriff
August 18, 2026

#20260901-05

The following Supplemental Appropriation is requested for FY27:

Category
Sheriff's Department, General Fund
Sheriff's Office Levy
Misc Administrative Expenses

Line Item
4-100-031200-8123
4-100-031200-5860

Appropriation
New Total

Add
$
$

1,520.31
125.00

$
$

1,520.31
2,625.00

SOURCE OF FUNDING: Increase Sheriff's Office - Levy Revenue, 3-100-018990-0047-012, by $1,645.31.
COMMENTS: To move distress/seizure warrant revenue to an expenditure line and pay the Treasurer the funds we collected on the
Treasurer's levy and the rembursement for the tow fee.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Invoices of F.E. "Tripp" Isenhour from
July 24, 2026 through August 19, 2026
General Representation:

$5,848.00

Real Estate Tax Collection

$2,515.50

Personal Property Tax Collection:

$688.00

Miscellaneous Matters:

$5,090.70

Total Fee:

$14,142.20

General Representation Expense Paid:
Real Estate Tax Collection Expense Paid:
Personal Property Tax Collection Expense Paid:

$41.20
$12,747.36
$0.00

Miscellaneous Matters Expenses Paid:

$1,914.67

Total Expense:

$14,703.23

Total Bill:

$28,845.43

Total Delinquent Real Estate Tax Collections This Period:

$6,849.21

Total Delinquent Real Estate Tax Collections FY 26-27:

$33,842.73

Total Delinquent Real Estate Tax Collections FY 25-26:

$296,053.94

Total Delinquent Real Estate Tax Collections FY 24-25:

$309,792.37

Total Delinquent Real Estate Tax Collections FY 23-24:

$443,806.55

Total Delinquent Personal Property Tax Collections This Period:

$1,465.95

Total Delinquent Personal Property Tax Collections FY 26-27:

$8,561.12

Total Delinquent Personal Property Tax Collections FY 25-26:

$71,163.75

Total Delinquent Personal Property Tax Collections FY 24-25:

$110,925.50

Total Delinquent Personal Property Tax Collections FY 22-23:

$182,087.31

MEMORANDUM

To:

Frank Rogers, County Administrator FJR

From:

Whit Clark, Sheriff

Subj.

Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant

________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND:
The Sheriff’s Office was allocated $10,652 under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant Program. This grant is 100% funded with no County match
requirements. This formula grant will be dedicated to replacing 21 handguns with new
Glock 45s, enhanced with red dot sights. This will completely transition full-time
Sheriff’s Office employees to the new weapons system.

DISCUSSION:
The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program aims to provide vital
funding to support state and local law enforcement efforts. The Sheriff’s Office intends
to use JAG funding to replace existing Glock 45s with new Glock 45s enhanced by the
addition of red dot sights.
These updated firearms, complete with best-in-class hardware and optics, will enable
deputies to improve firearms qualification scores—thereby enhancing preparedness and
ensuring they are ready to protect the community in any emergency.
The addition of red dot sights and the replacement of existing firearms will also enable
deputies to shoot faster under high-stress or decreased visibility conditions. It will also
improve firearms accuracy and enable deputies to effectively utilize firearms even at
significant distances.

CAMPBELL COUNTY
SHERIFFS OFFICE
Winston W. Clark, III, Sheriff
Emergency 911

87 Courthouse Lane
P.O. Box 280 Rustburg, Virginia 24588

Altavista & Lynchburg
Brookneal & Gladys
Rustburg
FAX

(434) 592-9580
(434) 283-9580
(434) 332-9580
(434) 332-2710

Dear Members of the Campbell County Board of Supervisors:
The Campbell County Sheriff’s Office respectfully requests authorization to apply for a federal microgrant to
purchase two tethered drone systems to enhance public safety and provide additional operational support for
law enforcement, fire, EMS, and our local, state, and federal public safety partners.
The grant would fully fund the purchase of two tethered drone systems and related equipment, including
shipping, at a total cost of $105,409.98. No matching funds or in-kind contribution would be required from
Campbell County. Any recurring costs following the two-year grant period are expected to be minimal, if
required at all.
We recently became aware of this grant opportunity and, due to the expedited application timeline, were unable
to prepare a formal presentation to the Board. Part 1 of the application is due Wednesday, August 12, and Part 2
is due Friday, August 14.
Tethered drones would supplement our existing drone program by providing continuous aerial observation for
extended periods without the battery changes required by conventional drones. The systems can operate at
heights of up to approximately 150 feet while receiving continuous power through a tether, allowing them to
remain airborne for 24 hours or longer when operationally necessary.
Equipped with standard and infrared cameras, these systems could provide aerial overwatch during community
events, parades, barricaded-subject incidents, natural disasters, serious traffic crashes, fugitive searches, and
searches for lost or missing persons. This capability would provide enhanced situational awareness while
improving safety for first responders and the public.
The systems cannot be configured as license plate readers and will not be used for speed enforcement. Their use
will be limited to legitimate law enforcement and public safety purposes and will comply with all applicable
federal and state laws, including privacy protections.
Thank you for your continued support of public safety and the Campbell County Sheriff’s Office. We
respectfully request the Board’s authorization to pursue this fully funded grant opportunity. Please do not
hesitate to contact me if additional information is needed.
Sincerely,
Brian J. Murray
Support Services Captain
Campbell County Sheriff’s Office

APPOINTMENTS
BOARD/COMMISSION
Building Code Board of Appeals
Board of Fire Prevention Code Appeals

TERM
5 years

STIPEND
$50

STAFF CONTACT
Brian Stokes

MEETINGS
As Needed

Vacancy
(need professional engineer or architect)
Term expired
5/5/2021
____________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________
Board of Zoning Appeals
5 years
$85
Brian Stokes
As Needed
(judge appointed)
4th Tuesdays @7:00 pm
Vacancy
James Laughlin
6/30/2026
Ralph Hagner

Timberlake District
Sunburst District

Term expired 6/30/2023
Term expired

Spring Hill District

Term expired 6/30/2026

____________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________
Economic Development Commission4 years
$85
Nina Rezai
3rd Thursday of March &
September @12:00 pm
Vacancy
At Large - Planning Commission
Term expires
12/31/2026
Vacancy
Spring Hill District
Term expired 12/31/2023
Willie Jones
Brookneal District
Term expired 12/31/2025
____________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________
CCUSA
4 years
$150
Jeff Wells
4th Tuesdays
@6:30 pm
Joseph Kirkland
12/31/2024
Charlie Droog

Spring Hill District
Timberlake District

Term expired
Term expired 12/31/2024

*Per Board action on 2/7/2023, representatives from Brookneal, Rustburg, & Timberlake will be reappointed until
12/31/2026, then every 4 years moving forward.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
________________
Brookneal/Campbell Airport Authority
4 years
$85
Nina Rezai
3rd Wednesdays
@6:30 pm
John Barksdale
Term expired
1/31/2026
____________________________________________________________________________________________
________________
Library Board of Trustees
4 years
$85
Jordan Welborn
3rd Mondays
@5:30 pm
(limit 2 terms)
Vacancy

Brookneal District

Term expired 12/31/2025

____________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________
Recreation Advisory Council
3 years
$50
Jordan Welborn
2nd Wednesdays
@6:00 pm
Vacancy
Spring Hill District
Term expired 12/31/2025
Maurice Peerman
Brookneal District
Term expired 12/31/2025

MEMORANDUM

To:

Members, Board of Supervisors

From:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator FJR

Subject:
MATTERS FROM THE BOARD
________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND:
At each meeting, time will be scheduled to address matters from the Board that have not
been scheduled on the agenda. This time is typically used to share information or request
information from staff and not to take action on items that are not on the agenda. Items
requiring action are typically requested in advance so that the appropriate information
gathering and notice can be provided.
The Board’s policy is that any citizen may request time on the agenda by contacting the
Clerk of the Board. These requests, with supporting background materials, should be made
in writing two weeks prior to a scheduled meeting so requests can be researched and
included on the agenda for action as needed.

RECOMMENDATION:
Please share any information or requests with the Board and/or staff as appropriate.

INTERIM AD DRAFT
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in Lynchburg News & Advance on the dates indicated
below. If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at [email protected]
Notice ID: rpacr7Mm2VFWDB8hw90U | Proof Updated: Jul. 28, 2026 at 01:59pm EDT
Notice Name: Board of Supervisors September 2026

See Proof on Next Page
This is not an invoice. Below is an estimated price, and it is
subject to change. You will receive an invoice with the final
price upon invoice creation by the publisher.
FILER

FILING FOR

Austin Mitchell

Lynchburg

[email protected] News &
(434) 332-9597

Advance

Ad
Columns Wide: 2

Class:

Legals

08/16/2026: General Legal

220.83

08/23/2026: General Legal

220.83

Legal Processing Fee

20.00

Online Fee

10.00

Total

$471.66

Board of Supervisors September 2026 - Page 1 of 2

Board of Supervisors September 2026 - Page 2 of 2

PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION REPORT

SEPTEMBER 1, 2026

CAMPBELL COUNTY GOVERNMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION
Commission Member

District

David Gough

Altavista

Dean Monroe
Chair

Brookneal

Megan Witt

Concord

Michael Condrey

Rustburg

Robert Otero

Spring Hill

John Thilking

Sunburst

Trish Hedges
Vice Chair

Timberlake

Charlie Watts

Board of Supervisors Representative

Staff

Kate Reusch

Planner

Brian Stokes

Community Development Director

MEETING AGENDA
Case

Applicant

Request

Recommendation

PL-26-154

Asad Imtiaz

Rezoning
B-GC to R-SF

Approval

Please note that decisions made by the Planning Commission are not final until after the
Board of Supervisors confirms the recommendations on September 1, 2026.

CAMPBELL COUNTY
ZONING DISTRICTS
Agricultural Districts
A-1

Agricultural
Residential Districts

R-SF Single Family
R-MF Multi Family
R-DU Dense Urban
Commercial Districts
B-LC Limited Commercial
B-GC General Commercial
B-HC Heavy Commercial
Industrial Districts
I-G Industrial General
I-H Industrial Heavy

EXCERPTS FROM CODE OF VIRGINIA
ZONING
§ 15.2-2200. Declaration of legislative intent.
This chapter is intended to encourage localities to improve the public health, safety, convenience
and welfare of its citizens and to plan for the future development of communities to the end that
transportation systems be carefully planned; that new community centers be developed with
adequate highway, utility, health, educational, and recreational facilities; that the need for mineral
resources and the needs of agriculture, industry and business be recognized in future growth; that
residential areas be provided with healthy surroundings for family life; that agricultural and
forestal land be preserved; and that the growth of the community be consonant with the efficient
and economical use of public funds.
§ 15.2-2283. Purpose of zoning ordinances.
Zoning ordinances shall be for the general purpose of promoting the health, safety or general
welfare of the public and of further accomplishing the objectives of § 15.2-2200. To these ends,
such ordinances shall be designed to give reasonable consideration to each of the following
purposes, where applicable: (i) to provide for adequate light, air, convenience of access, and safety
from fire, flood, crime and other dangers; (ii) to reduce or prevent congestion in the public streets;
(iii) to facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community; (iv) to
facilitate the provision of adequate police and fire protection, disaster evacuation, civil defense,
transportation, water, sewerage, flood protection, schools, parks, forests, playgrounds, recreational
facilities, airports and other public requirements; (v) to protect against destruction of or
encroachment upon historic areas; (vi) to protect against one or more of the following:
overcrowding of land, undue density of population in relation to the community facilities existing
or available, obstruction of light and air, danger and congestion in travel and transportation, or loss
of life, health, or property from fire, flood, panic or other dangers; (vii) to encourage economic
development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax base; (viii) to
provide for the preservation of agricultural and forestal lands and other lands of significance for
the protection of the natural environment; (ix) to protect approach slopes and other safety areas of
licensed airports, including United States government and military air facilities; (x) to promote the
creation and preservation of affordable housing suitable for meeting the current and future needs
of the locality as well as a reasonable proportion of the current and future needs of the planning
district within which the locality is situated; and (xi) to provide reasonable protection against
encroachment upon military bases, military installations, and military airports and their adjacent
safety areas, excluding armories operated by the Virginia National Guard. Such ordinance may
also include reasonable provisions, not inconsistent with applicable state water quality standards,
to protect surface water and ground water as defined in § 62.1-255.

MEMORANDUM
To:

Planning Commission

From:

Kate N. Reusch, Planner KNR

CC:

Brian R. Stokes, Community Development Director BRS

Subject:

Rezoning #PL-26-154 (383 Village Highway)

Date:
July 27, 2026
_________________________________________________________________________________

General Information
Applicant: Asad Imtiaz
Owner: Ash Holdings, LLC
Request: B-GC (Business – General Commercial) to
R-SF (Residential – Single Family)
Location: 383 Village Highway
Election District: Rustburg
Tax Map Number(s): 34A-22-1D
Acreage: 0.75 +/- acres
Proposed Use: Allow for the existing structure to be renovated and used as a
single-family dwelling
Magisterial District: Long Mountain (2020 population 10,478)
Subject Property Analysis
The applicant is seeking to rezone the parcel to R-SF in order to renovate the existing single-family
dwelling and return it to residential use. The current structure is a single-family dwelling that was
built in 1959 and predates the zoning code. The use of the property as a residence is a nonconforming use; however, the property has been vacant and has not been used as single-family
residence for more than 2 years. Any future use of the property must conform with the current
zoning code. The applicant has also purchased the gas station next door and has stated that he
intends to use the dwelling for his personal use.
This request is considered a downzoning because it reduces the land use intensity that would
otherwise be permitted on the property. Piecemeal downzonings are impermissible under Virginia
law except where there is a change in circumstances, a mistake in fact, or fraud.
Land Use Compatibility
This request is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.

Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommend approval of this request by a vote of 6-0 citing a change
in circumstances as this area is primarily residential and has not developed commercially.

Site Data
Surrounding Zoning: The area is mixed use in nature. Zoning in the vicinity is B-GC (Business –
General Commercial), B-LC (Business – Limited Commercial), and A-1 (Agricultural).
Land Use/Floodplain: The property does not lie within any FEMA 100-year flood zones.
Access and Traffic: The property would be accessed by one existing driveway off of Village
Highway Route 501 (average daily traffic 11,000 vehicles).
Utilities: The parcel is served by public water and private septic.
Proffers: No proffers have been submitted with this request. No one employed by or associated
with Campbell County has suggested, requested, or required proffers as a condition of this request
Comprehensive Plan: The property is located in an area designated as medium to high density
mixed.
Comprehensive Plan Map

Zoning – Current
B-GC (Business – General Commercial)

Zoning – Proposed
R-SF (Residential – Single Family)

Aerial Map

Public Notification
In accordance with Section 15.2-2204, Code of Virginia, all adjoining property owners and those
located immediately across the street of the subject parcel were notified by mail of the rezoning
request. At the time of this report, no comments in support or opposition of the request have been
received.

1" = 74'

Campbell Property Map

¯

THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular
purpose. Site-specific information is best obtained after an onsite visit by a competent professional.

Campbell County, Virginia
County Boundary

E9-1-1 Addresses

Summary Tab

Lot Numbers

Road Centerlines

Parcels

HiddenRoadCenterline

Personal Statement and Narrative in Support of Rezoning Request
Case No. PL-26-154
Property: 383 Village Highway
Rustburg, Virginia 24588
July 8, 2026
Dear Members of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors:
I, Asad Imtiaz, respectfully ask for your approval of the rezoning request for 383 Village
Highway, Parcel ID 34A-22-1D, in Campbell County, Virginia. The property is owned by Ash
Holdings LLC, and I am submitting this request as the applicant and authorized agent. I am
requesting to rezone approximately 0.75 acres from B-GC to R-SF so that the existing vacant
single-family dwelling on the property can be renovated and returned to residential use.
This request is personal to me. I intend to live in the home myself as my personal residence and
maintain the property responsibly. This is not just a business decision to me. I want to restore the
house, take personal responsibility for the property, and make it a safe, clean, and wellmaintained home.
I am not asking to open a business, create a commercial site, build a larger development,
subdivide the property, or bring a more intensive use to the area. I am requesting for the
opportunity to restore an existing vacant house and use it as a home, its primary purpose.
Because I intend to live there myself, I have every reason to care for the property, maintain it
properly, and be a respectful neighbor.
The property already contains a single-family dwelling, but it is currently vacant. As the
committee may know, a vacant house does not improve itself, and leaving it unused does not
benefit the property, the surrounding area, or the County. My goal is to renovate the existing
structure and bring it back into active residential use instead of allowing it to remain vacant or
fall further into disrepair.
The current B-GC zoning does not match what I am proposing. That zoning classification
suggests a commercial use, but I am not proposing a commercial use. The proposed R-SF zoning
is a better fit because the existing structure is residential, the intended use is residential, and the
requested zoning is residential. In practical terms, this rezoning would allow the zoning
classification to match the actual condition and intended use of the property.

The proposed residential use request does not involve customer traffic, business
operations, commercial signage, outdoor storage, or the noise and activity associated with a
commercial use. I simple request to allow an existing single-family dwelling to be renovated,
occupied, and maintained as a residence.
I understand that rezoning decisions matter and that the County must consider the impact
on the surrounding community. I respectfully believe this request is compatible with the property
and appropriate for the area because it is tied to the structure that already exists. Restoring a
vacant home for personal residential use is a limited and reasonable request, and it would allow
the property to move in a better direction through repair, occupancy, and regular maintenance.
I also understand that approval of this rezoning request would not waive any other
County or State requirements. I am prepared to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,
permits, inspections, building codes, utility requirements, health requirements, and access
requirements. I recognize the need to coordinate with the appropriate County departments, the
Campbell County Utilities & Service Authority, the State Health Department, and the Virginia
Department of Transportation as required.
I am merely asking for a fair opportunity to improve this property, restore an existing
home, and live there as a responsible resident. I respectfully ask the County to consider what
approval would actually accomplish: it would not authorize a new commercial operation or a
higher-impact development; it would allow a vacant single-family dwelling to be restored under
a zoning classification that fits the proposed residential use.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Planning Commission recommend
approval of Case No. PL-26-154 and that the Board of Supervisors approve the rezoning of 383
Village Highway, Parcel ID 34A-22-1D, from B-GC to R-SF.
Thank you for your time and kind consideration of my application.

Respectfully submitted,
Asad Imtiaz
Applicant / Authorized Agent for Ash Holdings LLC

85 Carden Lane, Suite A
Rustburg, VA 24588
(434) 332-9780
[email protected]

MEMORANDUM
TO:

Members, Board of Supervisors

THROUGH: Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator FJR
FROM:

Brian R. Stokes, Director Community Development

DATE:

August 19, 2026

SUBJECT: Increased residential density, with smaller lot requirements.
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND:
At the July 21st Board of Supervisors meeting, the Board adopted the Residential-Dense Urban
(R-DU) zoning district allowing smaller lots to support “stick-built” residential construction.
Supervisor Watts requested staff to draft language allowing this type of use in a similar zoning
district, such as Residential-Multi Family (R-MF) where greater density is allowed.
DISCUSSION:
Effective July 1, 2026, the Virginia General Assembly passed legislation requiring localities with
a population over 50,000 to establish a zoning district allowing for the creation of parcels with a
minimum of 3,000 square feet, with 30’ of road frontage. In addition, the legislation allows
Manufactured Homes to be permitted in any residential zoning district that currently permits “
stick-built” single-family homes, while subject to the criteria set forth in § 15.2-2290 of the Virgina
Code.
In order to satisfy these legislative requirements, the existing Residential Manufactured Housing
(R-MH) zoning district was re-titled as Residential Dense Urban (R-DU), allowing all previous
permitted uses in the former R-MH district, including manufactured housing and reducing the
minimum lot size to 3,000 square feet, with 30’ of road frontage when both public water and public
sewer are available.
RECOMMENDATION:
Currently, the Residential Multi Family (RMF) zoning district allows for a minimum lot size of
7,500sqft when served by public water and public sewer. A greater level of residential density
could be allowed in this zoning district by reducing the minimum lot size to 3,000sqft when served
by public water and public sewer. If allowed, this would be a by right use. The 3,000sqft lot size
is consistent with lot size criteria established in the newly adopted Residential Dense Urban (RDU)
zoning district. It is important to note, lots with a minimum of 3,000sqft in the new RDU zoning
district shall be served by public water and public sewer and applicable roads within the
development shall be designed and built in accordance with VDOT standards and accepted into

the secondary system of state highways. These standards shall be applied to the RMF zoning
district.
For additional consideration, the reduced minimum lot standards mentioned above could be
allowed within the Community Mixed Use (CMU) zoning district as by right. The CMU district
was recently established to encourage a mix of high density residential with business-commercial
use and currently allows a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Residential lots within the CMU
zoning district shall be served by public water and public sewer and applicable roads within the
development shall be designed and built in accordance with VDOT standards and accepted into
the secondary system of state highways.
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is informational. Staff will incorporate these changes into the next semi-annual code
update scheduled for the end of this year.

MEMORANDUM
To:

Members, Board of Supervisors

Through:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator FJR

From:

Brian Stokes, Community Development Director BRS

Subject:

Public Notification Process, County Owned Property

Date:
August 20, 2026
_________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND:
At the July 21, 2026, Board of Supervisors meeting, Supervisor Hardie directed staff to review the
County’s current public notification procedures and to evaluate whether additional notice
requirements should be implemented for actions involving County owned property.

DISCUSSION:
Currently, the County’s policy is to provide notification for various types of public hearings
following the requirements set forth in section §15.2-22044 of the Code of Virginia. Please keep
in mind, by-right uses do not require a public hearing and are not subject to the public notification
requirements.
During discussion, the Board inquired about implementing the notification process used for
rezonings and special use permits, where written notification is mailed to all adjoining property
owners and those immediately across the street from the subject property.
The following is a summary of the various types of public hearings requiring public notification.
Rezonings / Special Use Permits
Public notification requires the publication of 2 advertisements in a local paper prior to the public
hearing. In addition, written notification is mailed to all adjoining property owners and those
immediately across the street from the subject property. Once formalized in the Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors agenda, the information is also available on the County’s
website.
Easements
The vacation of a County owned easement requires publication of 2 advertisements in a local paper
prior to the public hearing. The creation of an easement on County owned property currently
requires 1 advertisement in a local paper prior to the public hearing. Once formalized in the Board
of Supervisors agenda, the information is also available on the County’s website.

Using the recent request from AEP for a utility easement on County owned property, and
applying the notification process used for rezonings and special use permits, including
advertisement, mailers, and staff time would cost approximately $1,200.
RECOMMENDATION
Should the Board decide to expand the public notification requirements for easements on County
owned property to be consistent with the notification process used for rezoning and special use
permits, staff recommends adopting this change as a policy. Doing so would allow the revised
notification procedures to be implemented immediately while providing the flexibility to modify
the process if needed.

MEMORANDUM
To:

Members, Board of Supervisors

Through:

Frank J. Rogers, County Administrator FJR

From:

Brian R. Stokes, Community Development Director BRS

Subject:

Comprehensive Plan Update Schedule

Date:
August 20, 2026
_________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND:
At the May 19, 2026, joint work session with the Board of Supervisors and the Planning
Commission, staff presented the proposed 2027 Comprehensive Plan updates. Some chapters were
presented ahead of schedule and adopted by the Board at the August 4, 2026, meeting.
DISCUSSION:
The remaining updates will include revisions to Chapter 3 Administration and Finance to reflect
the most recent budget information, Chapter 4 Land Use to update the Future Land Use Map, and
Chapter 9 Transportation Systems and Facilities to include SMARTSCALE Round 7 projects.
As part of the Future Land Use Map update, staff will be soliciting public feedback. The
anticipated schedule is:
 August 28 - October 11, 2026 solicit public feedback
 October 26, 2026 Planning Commission (review of proposed changes)
 November 30, 2026 Planning Commission (recommendation)
 January 5, 2027 Board of Supervisors
RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item, no action is required at this time.

Economic Development Annual Update
August 2026

2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................3
Capital Investment ...........................................................................................................................4
Statistical Data .................................................................................................................................4
Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy ..........................................................................8
Marketing .......................................................................................................................................11
Business Retention and Expansion ................................................................................................12
Community Engagement ...............................................................................................................12
Business Programs .........................................................................................................................13
Airport Commerce Park .................................................................................................................14
Grants .............................................................................................................................................15
Boards/Committees ........................................................................................................................16
Projects ..........................................................................................................................................17
Summary .......................................................................................................................................18

3
Executive Summary:
Campbell County spans a 507-square-mile area with both suburban and rural environments. Its
boundaries include the towns of Altavista and Brookneal, with the County seat in Rustburg.
Campbell County is home to a strong agricultural history but also includes industrial and
business clusters.
Campbell County’s Department of Economic Development is responsible for engaging local and
regional partners to provide positive interactions with educators, business owners, and
employers. The department is staffed by Nina Rezai (Director), Karen Wydner (Administrative
Assistant), Molly Eden (Program Manager), Kristina Smith (Business Programs Coordinator),
and Claude Dixon (Grant Coordinator).
The Campbell County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) was presented
in January 2025 by Phoenix Advantage, LLC. The CEDS is a tool for planning the County’s
future economic development. The finished product is a clear path to focus economic
development efforts over the next five years.
Small business programs are a key offering from Economic Development. The Start Small
Campbell Grant program helps establish new businesses in the County by incentivizing
entrepreneurship training with much-needed startup capital. Two new businesses received grants
in fiscal year 2026. Campbell Connects is the department’s quarterly business networking event
presented in partnership with the Lynchburg Regional Business Alliance. Three Campbell
Connects events held in 2025-2026 attracted a total attendance of 28 business connections.
The Department continues to use various marketing tools to promote programs, real estate
offerings, and local business resources. The site selector tool from the Virginia Economic
Development Partnership provides comprehensive commercial and industrial property listings on
the Department’s website. The Department also utilizes social media, advertising, and earned
media campaigns to increase visibility. Economic Development applied for 9 grants and received
8 of them totaling $2.2M over the past year.
Development continued at Seneca Commerce Park. In September 2025, TRRC awarded
Campbell County a Sites and Infrastructure Grant of $439,275 for a water and sewer extension at
Seneca Commerce Park. A 103,000sf shell building on Lot K is currently underway. ColemanAdams Construction, Inc was awarded the bid for the first phase of construction, and
Architectural Partners will continue to provide construction administration.
The Department provides ongoing oversight and administrative support for the Brookneal
Campbell County Airport Authority (BCCAA) and the Campbell County Industrial Development
Authority (IDA). In FY2026, the IDA completed construction on phase 1 of their 45,000 square
foot shell building and began marketing the property.

4
Capital Investment:

Figure 1

185 new businesses opened between July 2025 and June 2026. Figure 1 shows the sector
distribution for all new businesses.
Business Prospects
New business prospects are gathered through lead generation. Partnerships with Lynchburg
Regional Business Alliance, Virginia Economic Development Partnership, and online marketing
platforms (Crexi) are a few ways the department obtains leads.
A RFI asks for details about a property that are relevant to the industry, such as water and sewage
capacity, road and highway accessibility, and workforce training. The department responded to
28 RFIs this year.

Statistical Data
Demographic Overview:
Campbell County’s population as of June 2026 was 55,312. There are 27,849 civilians working
in the region for a labor force participation rate of 60.7%. The percentage of Campbell County
residents with a bachelor’s degree or higher is 19.6%, compared to 21.3% in the region and
23.1% nationwide. Campbell County’s median household income is $66,165, and its median
house value is $211,600.

5

Percent
Campbell
County,
Virginia Virginia

Value

USA

Campbell
County,
Virginia

Virginia

USA

Demographics

Population (ACS)

—

Male
Female
Median Age

—

55,312 8,705,170 334,922,499

48.6%

49.4% 49.5%

26,907 4,300,735 165,808,018

51.4%

50.6% 50.5%

28,405 4,404,435 169,114,481

—

2

—

—

—

43.6

39.0

38.9

Under 18 Years

19.4%

21.7% 22.0%

10,718 1,890,833

73,517,834

18 to 24 Years

7.7%

9.3%

4,259

806,659

30,597,362

25 to 34 Years

12.9%

13.5% 13.7%

7,154 1,173,927

45,806,540

35 to 44 Years

11.8%

13.6% 13.2%

6,500 1,181,277

44,237,292

45 to 54 Years

12.4%

12.5% 12.2%

6,877 1,084,566

40,743,799

55 to 64 Years

14.5%

12.8% 12.7%

8,033 1,114,165

42,386,044

65 to 74 Years

11.9%

9.9% 10.2%

6,608

861,272

34,092,907

75 Years and Over

9.3%

6.8%

5,163

592,471

23,540,721

Labor Force Participation Rate and Size (civilian
population 16 years and over)

60.7%

64.7% 63.3%

27,849 4,468,236 170,199,520

Prime-Age Labor Force Participation Rate and Size
(civilian population 25-54)

80.4%

84.4% 83.2%

16,485 2,825,743 108,100,165

Work from Home

9.8%

18.3% 15.1%

2,584

793,064

24,042,489

9.1%

7.0%

Economic

Median Household Income

—

—

—

$66,165

$93,170

$80,734

Per Capita Income

—

—

—

$34,966

$50,666

$44,673

Mean Commute Time (minutes)

—

—

—

23.3

27.3

26.4

0.1%

2.3%

3.2%

24

101,220

5,157,401

No High School Diploma

8.0%

7.5%

9.8%

2,291

343,210

17,001,659

High School Graduate

33.8%

22.7% 24.8%

9,665 1,033,679

42,949,236

Some College, No Degree

20.0%

17.5% 18.9%

5,703

795,691

32,726,555

Associate's Degree

10.1%

8.1%

2,875

368,545

15,888,163

Bachelor's Degree

19.6%

25.3% 23.1%

5,598 1,150,942

40,059,314

Postgraduate Degree

8.5%

18.9% 14.2%

2,432

24,548,748

2

Commute via Public Transportation
Educational Attainment, Age 25-64

9.2%

861,868

Housing

Total Housing Units

—

—

—

—

—

— $211,600 $383,700

Homeowner Vacancy

1.9%

0.8%

0.9%

334

18,455

796,730

Rental Vacancy

4.2%

4.8%

5.5%

248

55,766

2,645,644

Renter-Occupied Housing Units (% of Occupied Units)

25.1%

32.7% 34.8%

5,572 1,099,123

45,017,354

Owner-Occupied Housing Units (% of Occupied Units)

74.9%

67.3% 65.2%

16,668 2,266,609

84,210,142

Median House Value (of owner-occupied units)

2,5

25,533 3,684,756 143,775,355
$332,700

6

Percent
Campbell
County,
Virginia Virginia

Occupied Housing Units with No Vehicle Available (% of
Occupied Units)

Value

USA

Campbell
County,
Virginia

Virginia

USA

4.7%

6.1%

8.4%

1,045

205,185

10,793,323

Poverty Level (of all people)

10.8%

9.9% 12.5%

5,882

837,363

40,735,661

Households Receiving Food Stamps/SNAP

12.3%

9.1% 12.1%

2,735

307,649

15,572,114

Enrolled in Grade 12 (% of total population)

1.2%

1.3%

1.3%

641

113,305

4,441,917

Disconnected Youth

4.8%

2.1%

2.4%

121

9,524

430,721

Children in Single Parent Families (% of all children)

32.9%

31.3% 33.9%

3,303

560,802

23,651,363

Uninsured

4.7%

6.9%

8.4%

2,553

586,299

27,734,911

With a Disability, Age 18-64

12.8%

10.2% 10.9%

4,165

527,174

21,803,902

With a Disability, Age 18-64, Labor Force Participation
Rate and Size

47.9%

49.9% 48.5%

1,993

263,285

10,583,510

Foreign Born

3.4%

13.1% 14.1%

1,893 1,142,826

47,349,078

Speak English Less Than Very Well (population 5 yrs and
over)

2.4%

6.2%

1,242

27,139,643

Social

3

8.6%

511,059

Figure 2
Source: JobsEQ®
1. American Community Survey 2020-2024, unless noted otherwise
2. Median values for certain aggregate regions (such as MSAs) may be estimated as the weighted averages of the median values from the composing counties.
3. Disconnected Youth are 16-19 year olds who are (1) not in school, (2) not high school graduates, and (3) either unemployed or not in the labor force.
4. Census Population Estimate for 2025, annual average growth rate since 2015.
5. The Census's method for calculating median house values changed with the 2022 data set, so pre-2022 values are not directly comparable with later data.

Quality of Life
Campbell County is an affordable place to live. Figure 3 shows that Campbell County’s cost of
living is lower than the Lynchburg MSA, the state, and the U.S. Its annual average salary is
$70,321 which is lower than that of the state and the U.S.
Cost of Living

Annual Average
Salary

Cost of Living
Index (Base US)

US Purchasing
Power

Cost of Living
Index (Base
Campbell County,
Campbell County,
Virginia
Virginia)
Purchasing Power

Campbell County,
Virginia

$70,321

91.9

$76,502

100.0

$70,321

Virginia

$77,417

106.1

$72,992

115.4

$67,095

USA

$76,205

100.0

$76,205

108.8

$70,049

Figure 3
Source: JobsEQ®
Cost of Living per COLI, data as of 2026Q1, imputed by Chmura where necessary.
Total - All Industries, Total Employment, Campbell County, Virginia

7
Labor:
Campbell County’s largest sector is manufacturing, with 4,675 workers. The next-largest sectors
are retail trade (2,431 workers) and construction (2,240 workers). A high location quotient (LQ)
indicates a region’s high concentration of employment in a sector compared to the nation.
Manufacturing (2.92), construction (1.79) and agriculture/forestry (1.25) are the three sectors
with the highest LQs in the region.

Figure 4

Regional sectors with the best job growth, or most modest job losses, over the last five years are
Health Care and Social Assistance (+626 jobs) and Administrative/Support/Waste Management
(+274 jobs). In the next year, employment is expected to grow by 34 jobs. With a +0.7% yearover-year growth rate, Health Care and Social Assistance will be the fastest growing sector in the
region.
Wages
The average worker in Campbell County earned wages of $73,557 as of 2026Q1. Average annual
wages per worker increased 23.5% in the County over the preceding four quarters. This is lower
than the national annual average wages of $77,110.

8

Figure 5

Unemployment
As of April 2026, the unemployment rate in Campbell County was 3.4%. This rate is lower than
the national rate of 4.1%. This unemployment rate is lower than June 2025’s rate of 3.5%.

Figure 6

Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
Campbell County must review its Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)
every 5 years to maintain an Industrial Development Authority, a requirement set forth by the
U.S. Economic Development Administration. CEDS is a nationwide strategic planning process

9
that contributes to individual, firm, and community success by establishing and maintaining a
robust economic ecosystem. Through CEDS, individuals, organizations, local governments,
educational institutes, and private companies engage in meaningful dialogue on improving the
County’s economic development. Since the completion of the 2025 CEDS, staff worked on the
goals that were quick to accomplish and the highest priority first.
CEDS progress can be found in the chart below. Updates on specific CEDS goals with
significant progress already made are listed below the chart. The complete CEDS document can
be found online at https://www.co.campbell.va.us/986/Comprehensive-Economic-DevelopmentStrat.

Develop a Strong Campbell County Brand and Marketing Strategy:
The rebranding project consisted of four main phases: Kick off and discovery, messaging/logo
development and community engagement, asset development and implementation, and launch.
Kick off and discovery (July 2025-August 2025)
Three BLKDOG staff (Jesse, Anthony, Hannah) visited the County for three days and facilitated
4 in-person guided discussions. A total of 30 residents provided context that helped the
consultants understand Campbell County’s culture and values. BLKDOG delivered an executive
summary of their visit and meetings as well as a concept board that Economic Development

10
shared at the September Steering Committee meeting. Staff took the BLKDOG team on a driving
tour of the County to familiarize them with the local landscape.
Messaging/Logo Development (Sept-Nov 2025) and Community Engagement (Oct-Nov 2025)
5 concepts were presented to the Steering Committee, who selected the final 3 logos and colors.
Staff and BLKDOG cohosted 32 stakeholders and staff from all internal departments in virtual
workshops to discuss logo strengths/weaknesses. Staff visited 2 schools in Rustburg to involve
youth participation. In Oct/Nov 2025, a 13-question community survey yielded 342 responses.
Brand Asset Development and Implementation Planning (Nov 2025-April 2026)
BLKDOG and staff coordinated on development of the Brand Guide and Brand Assets to include
a full logo suite, developmental variations, and 2 sub-brands for Libraries and Parks &
Recreation. In March 2026, BLKDOG provided a Marketing and Implementation Strategy that
included a 3-year budget as directed by staff.
Launch (June 2026)
In April, Public and Employee Relations (PER) presented the new brand at the Open Employee
meeting. The brand was well-received. In May, Molly and Sherry Harding (PER) provided
internal brand training to department representatives. In June, the final brand was presented to
the Board of Supervisors. Economic Development’s website was discontinued and merged into
the County’s site to unify communications. IT Department initiated the use of Code 2 software to
unify email signatures. County affiliated social media accounts immediately implemented the
new brand.
The first public activation of the new brand was at the Summer Reading Festival on July 25.
Public Works, GIS, and Economic Development staff worked together on an application to
VDOT to replace/move 6 new gateway signs. All other gateway signs will be removed and
replaced as budget allows. Quotes are underway for new way-finding signs in the Rustburg
county complex.

Establish A Food Hub:
Economic Development and Campbell County Extension Staff co-hosted a Food Hub Interest
Meeting on September 29, 2025. Following the meeting, Campbell County Extension began
developing a workshop series to address identified deficits in operations. In May 2026, Campbell
County received $3,583 in Virginia Tobacco Revitalization Region funding for the series as a
regional pilot program, which will address the need for practical business training.
In February 2026, staff moved to transition this goal from a Campbell County Food Hub to a
regional project. Staff approached regional partners (LRBA, Bedford Economic Development,

11
and CVPDC) who are amenable to collaborating on the regional approach. Conversations are
ongoing with several nonprofits in the area.

Marketing:
The Campbell County Economic Development Department develops and distributes marketing
materials aimed at attracting and retaining businesses. All data shown in figure 7 is from July
2025-June 2026.

Figure 7
Property Advertising
The department started the year with Yellow Branch and Seneca Commerce Park (all lots) listed
on CoStar/Loopnet. On June 1, 2026, the department signed a one-year advertising contract with
Crexi, a competitor real estate listing platform that allows unlimited listings and includes
automated emails to brokers and access to Crexi Intelligence. Since listing with Crexi, our office
has had a lead for a bakery manufacturer for the 103,000sf Industrial Building, one lead from a

12
property developer on the Brookneal Industrial Property on Price Avenue, and multiple leads for
the Yellow Branch Parcel.
Virginia Economic Development Partnership (VEDP) also hosts a site selection platform where
localities can submit both publicly and privately-owned property zoned for
Industrial/Commercial use. Campbell County currently has 2 properties listed, with the most
viewed properties in the last 90 days being the Mt. Athos site, Airport Commerce Park, and
Sanfacon.

Business Retention & Expansion (BRE):
Six BRE Visits were initiated by staff in FY2026. Local resources and business tools were shared
with each company during the visit. General feedback included that manufacturing and defense
organizations are continuing to grow.

Community Engagement
Over the course of FY26, the department was able to connect with 53 organizations through
community outreach, workforce support events, and more. This number does not include
business outreach through ongoing programs, such as Campbell Connects.

Campbell Connects
Through Campbell Connects, business owners and professionals strengthen connections and
relationships. The program also allows them to discover upcoming grant and funding
opportunities, business resources, and programs offered by other local organizations. Quarterly
events were held at various locations throughout the County. In FY2026, the event was held at
the following locations:
Date
August 2025

Region
Wards Road

November 2025

Timberlake

April 2026

Concord

Location
Angus Mexican
Grill
Carmela’s At
The Loft
Grinnin’ Bear
Tavern

Registered
11

Attended
8

22

14

25

6

After further reflection on attendance rates and overall program interest, staff determined that the
Campbell Connects program should be restructured or eliminated in the upcoming fiscal year.

13

Workforce Development Panel – November 4, 2025
Staff held a Workforce Development Panel Nov. 4 at Home 2 Suites Simons Run. Industrial
company owners and hiring representatives were invited to a panel discussion led by Central
Virginia Community College, Legacy Education Center, and the Lynchburg Regional Business
Alliance on available workforce resources for their companies. Following the formal panel,
workforce partners were available to answer attendee questions and provide additional
information.
Virginia Career Works and National Center for Healthy Veterans were also in attendance. 24
people attended representing 18 organizations.

Ribbon Cuttings
In FY2026, the Economic Development Department attended seven ribbon cuttings and grand
openings in support of new local businesses.
Date
August 8, 2025
October 23, 2025
April 10, 2026
May 5, 2026
May 15, 2026
May 30, 2026
June 17, 2026

Location
Altavista YMCA Grand Opening
Wawa Grand Opening
Sundance Design & Build Ribbon Cutting
Centra Behavioral Health Ribbon Cutting
Altavista Animal Clinic Ribbon Cutting
Rustic Roots Studio Grand Opening
Augusta Springs Ribbon Cutting
Business Programs:

Start Small Campbell Grant
The Start Small Campbell Grant (SSCG) offers $5,000 to new businesses (open less than 3 years
or opening their first location in Campbell County). In FY26, six applications were submitted. In
August 2025, it was announced that the Start Small Campbell Grant program was a recipient of a
2025 Virginia Association of Counties Achievement Award.
The fall 2025 recipient was Rising Hope Health LLC, a holistic healthcare practitioner based out
of Evington. The spring 2026 recipient was Rustic Roots Studio LLC, a massage and wellness
studio located in Altavista.
Restaurants That Rent

14
The Restaurants That Rent program is geared toward restaurants opening for the first time or
establishing their first location in Campbell County. The program offers rent reimbursement for
one year up to $15,000. The restaurant must sign a lease commitment for three or more years,
occupy up to 3,500 sf, and not be located within town limits.
Bacon St. Bagel’s new Wards Road location was approved for the program in March 2026.
Spark Innovation Center Fire-Up Altavista Program + Create Small
Campbell County’s Department of Economic Development is a partner of the Fire-Up Altavista
program. Fire-Up Altavista is a free program for entrepreneurs who are ready to start or grow
their business. Over the course of eight weeks, participants receive hands-on business training in
subjects like industry trends, financing a business, marketing, and more. The program culminates
in a pitch competition for $50,000 in grant funding.
The program’s first cycle began in February 2026. During the first cycle, participants were
required to secure a business location within the Main Street business district to be eligible for
funding. In future cycles (years 2 and 3), the program will expand countywide.
Create Small is a hands-on business startup program offered to local entrepreneurs. Classes were
held from April 16-June 25 and the program culminated in a business showcase at the Booker
Building in Altavista on July 17, 2026.
CLiMB Fund
The CLiMB Revolving Loan Fund continues to be available but underutilized. On IDA
recommendation, staff adjusted the application process that refers eligible applicants to the IDA
for an initial review and provisional approval before the business completes full application
paperwork.
In FY2026, three businesses completed the eligibility form and were referred to the IDA
chairman, none presented to the IDA.

Airport Commerce Park:
The City of Lynchburg funded the full engineering design of water and sewer utilities for the
property according to the master plan designed in 2020. Campbell County Utility Services
Authority kicked the project off in November and the project is currently on hold.
Economic Development submitted several options for capital improvement project (CIP) funding
to begin development in Airport Commerce Park to create business ready sites. Ultimately, the
Board of Supervisors did not fund them for FY2027. A recommendation was presented to initiate
a Regional Industrial Facility Authority with the adjoining property owner(s).

15
Grants:
Staff received several grants, applied to more grants, and assisted other organizations in
submitting applications. In total, staff applied for 9 grants in FY2026 and 8 were awarded. In
total, $2,292,858 in grant funds were secured for Campbell County projects that were matched to
the local share of various projects.
Funding Agency
Virginia
Department of
Conservation &
Recreation
Virginia
Department of
Housing and
Community
Development
Virginia
Department of
Housing and
Community
Development
Tobacco Region
Revitalization
Commission
Tobacco Region
Revitalization
Commission
Tobacco Region
Revitalization
Commission
Tobacco Region
Revitalization
Commission
Tobacco Region
Revitalization
Commission
Tobacco Region
Revitalization
Commission
Figure 8

Department
Campbell
County Parks
& Recreation

Date
8/28/25

Result
Awarded
$300,000

Notes
Restroom facility to include hookup to
electrical, water well, and septic system

Campbell
County
Training
School
Complex
Town of
Brookneal

7/1/25

Awarded
$75,000

Plan to establish a childcare center in Large
Classroom Building – CCTSC and Center
for Early Success working together to find
operator

Fall
2025

Denied
Brookneal submitted application to build a
(requested Park by Staunton River including camping
$75,000) spots, fire pits, and food truck areas

Campbell
County
Training
School
Complex
Economic
Development

2/25/26

Awarded
$400,000

Parking lot construction

Ongoing Awarded
(FY
$439,275
2026)
05/2026 Awarded
$400,000

Seneca Commerce Park infrastructure with
water/sewer extension line installation

05/2026

Awarded
$3,583

Agribusiness workshop series

Town of
Brookneal

05/2026

Awarded
$275,000

Site prep and installation of 12 RV sites
with water, sewer, and electrical hookups

Virginia
Technical
Institute
(VTI)

05/2026

Awarded
$400,000

Construction to create
incubator/manufacturing area

Campbell
County
Training
School
Complex
Economic
Development

Resurface and reconstruct campus parking
lot and internal access roadway

16
The Town of Altavista received a $828,165 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) in
February 2026. This grant is not included in figure 8 as Economic Development staff did not
assist in this application process.
In 2025, the Tobacco Region Revitalization Commission awarded the Town of Altavista
$106,000 to support three years of the Fire-Up Altavista program. Campbell County Economic
Development provided a match through the Start Small Campbell Grant program. Year 1 of the
program focused on the downtown Altavista district. Years 2 and 3 will be open Countywide.

Boards/Committees:
Industrial Development Authority
The Campbell County Industrial Development Authority (IDA) meets five times throughout the
year for regular business and special meetings are called as needed. The IDA consists of seven
members appointed by the Board of Supervisors from each of the County electoral districts. The
IDA owns two buildings in Seneca Commerce Park.
265 Ewing Drive is occupied by CTP Advanced Composites. Their lease will be due for renewal
in 2026.
293 Ewing Drive is a 45,000sf dark shell building currently being marketed for lease or
purchase. The building will be finished to suit the prospective tenant. The dark shell will take 612 months to finish out for a tenant, depending on their needs.
Brookneal-Campbell County Airport Authority
Staff continue to assist the Brookneal Campbell County Airport Authority (BCCAA). The on site
building is rented to Satellite Operations LLC flight school. Fuel services are contracted out and
operated by Freedom Aviation. Freedom Aviation pays BCCAA $0.07 per gallon of fuel sold.
Economic Development Commission
The Campbell County Economic Development Commission meets twice a year and consists of
11 business professionals. The Commission serves as an advisory committee to the Board of
Supervisors on economic development issues/policy and serves as the core committee for the
Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) review and update.
Officer elections were held in FY2026. Beckie Nix, from the Concord District, was appointed as
the new chairman.

17
Projects:
HUBZone Designation
On April 13, 2026, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) announced that Census Tract
209 would be included in the Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) program
through a Governor’s designation. The program helps small businesses in these designated areas
gain preferential access to federal procurement opportunities. An email was sent to businesses in
this newly designated area informing them of the designation and giving them information and
resources on the program.
This is the second designated HUBZone in the county. The other zone covers the Town of
Altavista.
Lynchburg Regional Airport
In March 2026, the Lynchburg Regional Airport began offering daily flights to Chicago O’Hare
International Airport (ORD) and Washington, D.C. Dulles International Airport (IAD) through
United Airlines. The airport also offers daily flights to Charlotte, North Carolina through
American Airlines. The flight expansions connect the Lynchburg Region to major national hubs
and signals a major economic win for the region. The airport is managed by the City of
Lynchburg and located in Campbell County.
Tourism
Staff attended November 2025’s VA-1 Conference, the largest Virginia tourism conference
cohosted by VADMO, VTC, and the Virginia Restaurant Lodging and Travel Association. DMO
representatives and related tourism and hospitality businesses attended for professional
development and networking opportunities.
In February, staff secured resolutions from the Board of Supervisors and Town Councils of
Altavista and Brookneal to support an application to become the designated DMO for the
localities. Major responsibilities of a DMO include developing a comprehensive marketing plan
and budget to promote the locality, assisting with tourism product development, and coordinating
with VTC on partnership programs and grant opportunities. An email was sent to 28 hosts of
events, attractions, and hospitality businesses to advise them of the new DMO status and offer
assistance with tourism related questions.
Transient Occupancy tax increased from 2% to 7%. Virginia Code requires the revenue generated
by the first 3% of the increase to be used to support increasing overnight visitor stays. Access to
these funds should rapidly advance the CEDS goal of increasing tourism over the next few years.
Staff participated in steering committee for the Southern Virginia Blueways Project. Campbell
County will be part of the second phase of this southern Virginia river-based recreation zone.
Seneca Commerce Park:

18
•

•

•

•

•

Water & Sewer Extension (Ewing Drive): In September 2025, TRRC awarded
Campbell County a Sites and Infrastructure Grant of $439,275 for a water and sewer
extension at Seneca Commerce Park that will connect water/sewer service to Lots V, D,
E, and the 136-acre parcel. Campbell County originally applied for a VBRSP grant to
offset costs, but the application was not approved. Construction is ongoing and expected
to be completed in late 2026.
Property Sales: Blue Ridge Beverage purchased 14 acres. The facility will replace their
existing regional distribution hub in Lynchburg. Site preparation began in summer 2026.
Integrity Mechanical purchased 7 acres and intends to construct a 35,000 sf logistics
facility to complement their Lynchburg location.
VBRSP Grant: A VBRSP grant of $300,000 in August 2025 was awarded to support
master planning and due diligence on 180+ acres including Lot F, 40+ acres at the end of
Sallie Trail, and the 136-acre parcel to determine developable potential for the property.
Master plan will include at least one industrial parcel of 50+ acres to comply with
VBRSP program requirements.
Virginia Tech: In February 2026, staff engaged Virginia Tech Center for Economic
Development to conduct a Countywide Park Recreation Opportunity Assessment to
determine community preferences for potential recreation amenities to be included in
master planning of the 180+ county-owned acres. Recommendations included a trail
network, water feature, pavilion with lawn, open play/flex court, and an amphitheater.
103,000sf Building: A 103,000sf shell building on lots J and K is currently underway.
Coleman-Adams Construction, Inc was awarded the bid for the first phase of
construction, and Architectural Partners will provide construction management.

Summary
FY26 held milestones for many projects under the leadership of the Campbell County Economic
Development Team. In addition to ongoing business programs, the department continues to find
new ways to provide valuable resources to the Campbell County business community. The team
of five is dedicated to the mission of economic development through attracting new investment,
retaining existing business, and promoting new initiatives. These areas of focus can best be seen
through ongoing development in Seneca Commerce Park, the County’s small business
programming, and the new Designated Marketing Organization status.