On the agenda: Nags Head Planning Board — ALPR (Oct 20)

AGENDA
TOWN OF NAGS HEAD PLANNING BOARD
NAGS HEAD MUNICIPAL COMPLEX – BOARD ROOM
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2026; 9:00 AM
REGULAR SESSION
A.

CALL TO ORDER

B.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

C.

PUBLIC COMMENT/AUDIENCE RESPONSE

D.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.

E.

ACTION ITEMS
1.

F.

September 15th, 2026

Consideration of a UDO text amendment submitted by Anastasia Forlano to allow cosmetic tattooing as
an accessory use to permitted beauty salon uses within the town.

REPORT ON BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTIONS
1.

October 7th, 2026

G.

TOWN UPDATES - AS REQUESTED

H.

DISCUSSION ITEMS
1.

Presentation by John DeLucia of Albemarle & Associates, Ltd. and representatives of the Rogallo
Foundation regarding the Foundation’s mission and plans for a proposed aviation center and museum.

2.

Continued discussion of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). No ordinance amendments or specific

3.

Discussion of Commercial Outdoor Recreation Overlay District (CORD) in relation to the Comprehensive
Plan Character Areas and potential amendments to the UDO.

4.

Continued discussion of potential UDO amendments related to tree preservation.

5.

Planning & Development Directors Report – October 7th, 2026

regulatory changes are proposed for consideration at this meeting.

I.

PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS’ AGENDA

J.

PLANNING BOARD CHAIRMAN’S AGENDA

K.

ADJOURNMENT

Page 1 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes

-DRAFTTown of Nags Head
Planning Board
September 15, 2026

September 2026

The Planning Board of the Town of Nags Head met on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, in the Board
Room at the Nags Head Municipal Complex.
Planning Chair Meade Gwinn called the meeting to order at 9:02 a.m. as a quorum was present.

Members Present
Meade Gwinn, David Elder, Beverly Head, Valerie Netsch, Brad Carey, Basil Belsches

Members Absent
David Thompson

Others Present
Kelly Wyatt, Joe Costello, Chris Trembly

Approval of Agenda
Chair Gwinn called for approval of the agenda. David Elder moved to approve the agenda as
presented. Beverly Head seconded, and the motion passed by unanimous vote.

Public Comment/Audience Response
None

Approval of Minutes
Chair Gwinn asked for a motion to approve the minutes of the August 18th, 2026, meeting. David
Elder moved to approve the minutes as presented; Beverly Head seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously.

Action Items
None

Report on Board of Commissioners Actions – September 2nd, 2026
Planning Director Kelly Wyatt noted that the meeting included a number of recognitions and a
significant volume of public comments. On the consent agenda, the BOC considered a resolution
supporting the Outer Banks Health Recreational Trails Program grant application for a walking path at
the hospital campus. Ms. Wyatt wanted to make the Planning Board's aware of this item, as the
proposed path, ranging from 42 to 48 inches in width and extending around the entire hospital
campus, would represent a significant increase in lot coverage. Should the grant be awarded and the
project proceed, Outer Banks Health would need to amend their site plan, which would come before
the Planning Board. Ms. Wyatt noted that it would be a great extension to the paths. Also on the

1
Page 2 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes
-DRAFTSeptember 2026
consent agenda was consideration of a request for a public hearing on a text amendment related to
cottage courts brought forth by Eddie Goodrich, which had previously been heard by the Planning
Board. Deputy Planning Director Joe Costello provided the BOC with an update on a technical
assistance funding policy stemming from the Estuarine Shoreline Management Plan. During the
budget process, the BOC had agreed to allocate $10,000 to assist sound-side property owners with
up to $1,000 each toward consultation on green shoreline erosion mitigation measures. Under the
program, property owners would consult with George Wood of Environmental Professionals, who
would assess site conditions and advise on appropriate erosion measures, as well as assist with
permitting if the owner chooses to proceed. Chair Gwinn asked approximately how many private
properties could be served. Ms. Wyatt noted that while the total number of eligible sound-side
properties was not immediately known, the current funding would support up to ten property owners,
with the expectation that the program would be renewed in future budget years if successful.

Town Updates
None

Discussion Items
Continued discussion and historical overview of the Town’s prior consideration of Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs). No ordinance amendments or specific regulatory changes are proposed for
consideration at this meeting.
Ms. Wyatt led the Board, via a Power Point Presentation, through a comprehensive historical overview
of the Town's two prior efforts to adopt an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance, covering the
2019 and 2024–2025 processes, and framing the path forward for the current members. She
emphasized that while the historical record was being provided for context and orientation, the new
Board should feel free to approach the topic with fresh perspectives and was not feel bound by prior
conclusions or draft language.
Ms. Wyatt reviewed the current definitions and clarified the three relevant use categories that have
shaped the ADU discussion:
 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): A secondary dwelling unit subordinate to the principal
structure, which may be attached or detached. ADUs are not currently permitted in Nags
Head.
 Partial Home Short-Term Rentals: A resident-occupied single-family dwelling in which up to
two guest rooms may be rented for fewer than 30 days.
 Two-Family Dwelling (Duplex): A dwelling containing two independent housekeeping units,
each with direct exterior access, permitted only in specific zoning districts on lots of at least
22,500 square feet.
Ms. Wyatt noted that while these uses are categorically distinct in the zoning ordinance, their physical
layouts can be nearly identical, which she identified as one of the most significant challenges the
Board will need to address.
She then explained that the Town first considered ADUs in April 2019. The Planning Board
recommended adoption in June 2019. In September 2019, the BOC voted 2–3 against adopting the
proposed ordinance. The primary concerns at that time included a desire for more community
engagement, concern about density in westside neighborhoods, and questions about enforcement.
Key features of the 2019 proposal included: one ADU per single-family dwelling, attached or detached
configurations, a rental period of 30 days or more, a maximum unit size of 600 square feet or 50% of

2
Page 3 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes
-DRAFTSeptember 2026
the principal dwelling (whichever was less), a maximum height of 1.5 stories for detached structures,
shared utility connections, county septic approval, and geographic distinctions between districts
where ADUs would be allowed by right versus by conditional use.

In 2024–2025 Staff and the Planning Board worked on this topic again. This effort was a result of a
Strategic Plan action item directing staff to develop an ADU ordinance with optional provisions
designed to improve community acceptance. The process began with staff education, two public
engagement sessions in September 2024, and a review of public feedback. In general, participants
supported ADUs if accompanied by appropriate regulations and enforcement mechanisms, with
stronger support for attached units than detached. Key concerns closely resembled those from 2019:
neighborhood character, density, parking, traffic, septic capacity, stormwater management, and the
risk of conversion to short-term rental use.
Ms. Wyatt outlined six options considered during the 2024 process, ranging from prohibiting detached
ADUs entirely while allowing attached units town-wide, to permitting both types town-wide with
varying geographic and use restrictions. By January 2025, the Planning Board had reached general
consensus around the following framework: attached ADUs permitted town-wide; detached ADUs
permitted on lots greater than 16,000 square feet; a maximum unit size of 800 square feet or 50% of
the principal structure; one additional parking space per ADU; and a requirement that a long-term
resident occupy either the principal structure or the ADU.
The process stalled before a planned joint workshop with the BOC could be scheduled, due in part to
the enactment of Senate Bill 382 in December 2024 and uncertainty about potential legislative
amendments. No amendments to SB 382 were ultimately made, and the legislation remains in effect.
Mr. Belsches asked for a brief explanation of SB 382. Ms. Wyatt explained that the legislation,
commonly referred to as the "down-zoning bill," prohibits municipalities from initiating zoning actions
that would reduce or remove existing land use rights available to property owners. Because any ADU
ordinance would represent an upzoning, adding a new permitted use, the legislation does not prevent
the Town from proceeding. However, Ms. Wyatt cautioned that once a use is added, the Town would
be constrained in its ability to tighten associated standards after the fact. She used parking
requirements as an example, noting that if an ADU parking standard proved inadequate after
adoption, the Town could not later increase that requirement without risking a down-zoning
challenge.
Mr. Belsches summarized the implication: the Board should come up with standards they can live with
long-term, rather than adopting something that might later need to be rolled back.
Ms. Wyatt confirmed for Chair Gwinn that the standards would not be affected by a change in
ownership.
Chair Gwinn raised the issue of "density" as a recurring term in the ADU debate, and Ms. Wyatt noted
that it means different things to different people. At the public meetings when stakeholders
discussed density they used the word when referring to size of building structures, population, lot
coverage, and other factors.
Chair Gwinn requested and Ms. Wyatt agreed to prepare a working definition of density for future
meetings, so that all discussions could proceed from a shared understanding. Ms. Wyatt noted that
while a dictionary definition could be provided, differences in perception will likely persist and need to
be addressed through the community engagement process.

3
Page 4 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes
-DRAFTSeptember 2026
The Board then discussed the difficulty of distinguishing between a short-term rental arrangement
and an ADU in practice. Ms. Wyatt explained that a lawfully operating partial home short-term rental,
with a resident owner renting up to two rooms for fewer than 30 days, is permitted. However, if that
same space is rented to a long-term occupant who functions as a fully independent housekeeping
unit (eating, sleeping, cooking, and bathing independently from the owner), it begins to resemble a
duplex, which requires a 22,500 square-foot lot to be lawfully established.

Mr. Elder noted that some property owners operating compliant short-term rentals have or would like
to transition to long-term rentals, out of fatigue with the demands of the short-term rental market or
as way to help with workforce housing. Ms. Wyatt agreed noting that this inadvertently creates a
regulatory inconsistency. Mr. Elder also brought up the topic of Granny Pods.
Chair Gwinn asked for clarification on granny pods, which are permitted under state law when a
family member requires caregiving. Ms. Wyatt confirmed that a granny pod may be a separate
structure on the property, requires a physician's documentation of medical need, and must be
removed once the caregiving need no longer exists. Ms. Wyatt acknowledged the use, noting she
would add it to future slide presentations.
Ms. Wyatt and the Board then discussed terminology and other issues related to ADUs including the
possibility of having multiple septic systems on one property which are currently not desired by the
Town, the difference between partial and full home rentals, and differentiating ADUs from roommate
type situations with Ms. Wyatt noting that the town is not trying to regulate roommates.
Ms. Wyatt then presented a summary of ADU standards adopted by neighboring jurisdictions. Dare
County allows ADUs up to 1,200 square feet or 50% of the principal structure, requires two parking
spaces, and restricts occupancy to long-term use. Kill Devil Hills permits units up to 800 square feet
and requires long-term rental in certain districts. Kitty Hawk allows up to 800 square feet with one
parking space per ADU and requires the ADU to share the same driveway as the principal structure.
The Town of Duck also prohibits separate driveways and limits detached ADUs to 800 square feet.
Manteo allows up to 600 square feet and requires owner occupancy of either the principal or the
ADU. Ms. Wyatt noted that as of 2024, none of the neighboring jurisdictions reported being inundated
with ADU applications following adoption of their respective ordinances, and she offered to conduct
updated outreach to those municipalities before the next meeting.
Mr. Belsches requested that Ms. Wyatt ask how many property owners are taking advantage of the
standards and if there have been any (enforcement) issues with any of them. Mr. Belsches also
thought it might be interesting to find out, for those that adopted their ADU ordinances prior to the
enactment of SB 382, if they had since encountered challenges related to the legislation.
The Board then touched on deed restrictions and Chair Gwinn asked whether the Town Attorney
could provide a legal opinion on their use in connection with ADU regulations. Ms. Wyatt confirmed
that while the idea had come up in both prior efforts it had only been discussed with the attorney as
it applied to the multifamily ordinance process.
The Board briefly discussed where ADUs could be located and the difference between attached and
detached ADUs. Ms. Wyatt confirmed for Mr. Belsches that lot coverage requirements will always
apply but acknowledged that a detached ADU could have implications for stormwater management
infrastructure on a given site.
Finally, Ms. Wyatt outlined a proposed work plan for the coming months: first, the Board would define
the policy objectives an ADU ordinance should serve; second, it would address design and locational

4
Page 5 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes
-DRAFTSeptember 2026
parameters; third, it would develop draft ordinance language; and finally, it would seek a joint
workshop with the BOC and additional community engagement prior to any formal public hearing.

Discussion of the Commercial Outdoor Recreation Overlay District (CORD) in relation to the
Comprehensive Plan Character Areas and potential amendments to the UDO.
Mr. Costello led the Board through a Power Point Presentation giving a summary of the Commercial
Outdoor Recreation District (CORD), its history, recent developments in the area, and a proposed
framework for addressing recommended changes through a combination of a parks and recreation
planning process and a series of UDO text amendments.
Mr. Costello explained that the CORD was established in 1995 to concentrate commercial outdoor
recreational uses in a defined area along US 158 and prevent conflicts with residentially zoned
properties. The underlying zoning district is C-2 General Commercial. The ordinance designates the
CORD as the only area in town where commercial outdoor recreational uses are permitted. The
current UDO requires that any non-recreational use in the CORD must be accessory and subordinate
to an outdoor recreational use, and must be contained within the principal building.
The district is identified in the Town's most recent Strategic Plan under two action items: examining
allowable uses within the CORD, and determining whether the Board wishes to pursue a boardwalk or
CORD development concept.
Mr. Costello then presented a map of the CORD area, which extends along the north end of US 158
and includes the causeway area. Recent and ongoing development in the district includes a new hotel
constructed on the northernmost lot at Lakeside, the former Pamlico Jack's site being converted to
pickleball courts, and a recently approved hotel site at Tar Heel. There has also been sidewalks and
boardwalk segments constructed at the Soundside Event Site, including a completed boardwalk leg
extending toward the sound. Mr. Costello explained that the Comp Plan envisions the CORD as a
walkable, highly connected, mixed-use activity node featuring boutique hotels, outdoor recreation,
and cultural uses, a vision that is not currently reflected in how the district functions in practice. At
present, the area operates largely on a lot-by-lot basis, with limited pedestrian connectivity between
uses. Mr. Costello then briefly presented a 3D model and an animation of the area that he createad to
illustrate some of the potential elements discussed.
Mr. Costello confirmed that the Town has included a boardwalk extension in its CIP for fiscal years
2027–28 through 2030–31, covering design and construction of two future segments. A recently
issued RFQ for an updated Parks and Rec Master Plan will provide an opportunity for the community,
stakeholders, and property owners to weigh in on sound-side access, preferred boardwalk alignment,
and the overall character and programming of the CORD.
Mr. Costello noted that property managers and owners who participated in a prior public forum
expressed support for the boardwalk concept and indicated interest in redevelopment opportunities
aligned with the Town's vision.
Mr. Costello confirmed for Chair Gwinn that the Arts and Culture committee would be included as a
stakeholder in the parks and recreation planning process.
Mr. Costello outlined a series of potential UDO text amendments that would be brought to the
Planning Board individually over the coming months. These include:
 Allowing multiple principal uses within a unified development in the CORD, rather than
requiring non-recreational uses to be strictly accessory to an outdoor recreational use.

5
Page 6 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes
-DRAFTSeptember 2026
 Developing shared standards for parking, access, pedestrian circulation, signage, utilities, and
common areas.
 Expanding the list of uses that may accompany outdoor recreational uses in the district.
 Addressing how residential and lodging uses, including small multifamily and boutique hotels,
fit into the CORD framework, particularly in light of the Town's recently adopted multifamily
ordinance.
 Clarifying how concepts such as mixed-use development, group development, and multiple
principal uses are defined and applied in the context of the CORD.
 Addressing potentially incompatible C-2 uses within the CORD in light of SB 382 constraints.
 Considering activation of street-level activity through outdoor stands or similar uses.

Mr. Costello then presented working definitions of four development concepts to assist the Board in
future discussions: multiple principal uses, mixed-use development, group development, and
shopping center. He noted that the Town's current definition of mixed-use development references
indoor recreational facilities but does not contemplate outdoor recreational uses, which would need to
be addressed to align the ordinance with the CORD's vision.
Chair Gwinn asked for a plain-language explanation of multiple principal uses. Mr. Costello explained
that it would allow, for example, a mini golf course and a restaurant to each function as primary uses
on the same site, rather than requiring the restaurant to be subordinate to and accessory within the
outdoor recreational use.
Mr. Belsches inquired about SB 382 and raised a similar concern about the CORD that he raised
during the ADU discussion, whether the Town might inadvertently open a door through a text
amendment that it later finds difficult to close. Mr. Costello acknowledged that this issue would need
to be carefully managed as each amendment is drafted.

Presentation and preliminary discussion of potential UDO amendments related to tree preservation.
Ms. Wyatt introduced the item, summarizing the Town's current tree protection provisions: live oaks
may not be removed unless within the footprint of a proposed structure, diseased, or posing a safety
hazard, and removal requires Town approval. In environmental districts (SED-80, SED-20, SPD-20),
all tree removal is subject to enhanced review regardless of species. In general, commercial and other
non-environmental zones, no tree of six inches or greater in diameter at breast height (DBH) may be
removed without a previously approved site plan. This standard was adopted in response to a pattern
of property owners clear-cutting lots and then listing them for sale without any development plan.
Ms. Wyatt noted that a mitigation table in Appendix C establishes replanting requirements for
unauthorized tree removal, but that this table applies only to the environmental districts and lacks
broader applicability.
Planner Chris Trembly then led the detailed presentation describing a recent clearing violation on US
158, on a vacant lot located between Gallop Funeral Home and an adjacent gas station. The property
owner had previously obtained a land disturbance permit for mowing and brush removal. After closing
out that permit, the owner's contractor returned and inquired whether a permit was needed for
mowing and brush hogging. Mr. Trembly advised that routine mowing did not require a permit. Within
approximately one month, the lot had been completely cleared of tree canopy, with stumps
measuring up to 22 inches observed in the field. The contractor maintained that the work constituted
brush hogging rather than clearing. Because the disturbed area exceeded 5,000 square feet, Mr.
Trembly was able to pursue enforcement under the State's Erosion, Sedimentation, and Control Act,
which provided a clear definition of clearing. He noted, however, that if the area had been smaller,
the Town's own code would not have provided adequate authority to act.

6
Page 7 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes

-DRAFT-

September 2026

Mr. Trembly identified the absence of clear definitions for mowing, brush hogging/rotary cutting, and
clearing as the central problem. The Town's UDO references clearing as a category of land
disturbance that triggers permit requirements, but does not define what clearing means, creating
ambiguity that can be exploited. He proposed the following working definitions for the Board's
consideration:
 Mowing: The cutting of grasses and primarily herbaceous vegetation to reduce height and
maintain existing lawns, fields, rights-of-way, and landscaping areas, without removing trees
or shrubs, uprooting vegetation, disturbing soils, altering grades, or preparing land for a
different use.
 Brush hogging/rotary cutting: The cutting of tall grasses, brush, and small woody stems with a
rotary cutter or similar equipment to maintain or restore an existing field, undeveloped lot, or
open area, where roots and stumps remain in place and the activity does not include
grubbing, root raking, excavation, grading, or removal of established tree canopy.
 Clearing: The removal, destruction, or physical alteration of trees, shrubs, stumps, roots,
natural ground cover, soil, or rock by mechanical or chemical means — including grubbing or
root raking — when the activity exposes or disturbs the soil, alters grade or drainage, removes
established tree canopy, or prepares land for development or a different use.
Mr. Trembly emphasized that the distinction between these activities should be based on the result
and impact to the land, not the specific equipment used. He noted that a brush hog can be angled
and used to grind down trees of significant diameter, effectively accomplishing clearing while the
operator characterizes the work as mowing.
Mr. Elder raised the additional issue of intentional tree killing through ring-barking or chemical means,
and noted that this method had been attempted on live oaks in the past. Mr. Trembly and Ms. Wyatt
acknowledged that intent and method would need to be addressed in any revised framework.
Mr. Trembly then presented a possible review process for staff to determine whether an activity is
mowing, brush hogging, or clearing based on observable conditions: whether tree canopy was
removed, roots or stumps were extracted, soil was exposed or regraded, woody stems were
intentionally cut, and the apparent purpose was routine maintenance or land conversion.
He also suggested that the mitigation and replanting table currently limited to the environmental
districts be extended to apply town-wide, so that unauthorized tree removal outside of those districts
carries comparable remediation requirements.
Ms. Wyatt summarized the next steps: staff would compile the Town's existing tree-related code
provisions, identify gaps and inconsistencies, and return with a consolidated presentation and
proposed text amendments for the Board's review.
Chair Gwinn suggested that a height-based threshold, in addition to the existing DBH-based trigger,
be considered as an additional indicator requiring review before vegetation removal proceeds.

Planning & Development Director's Report - September 2nd, 2026
Ms. Wyatt provided brief updates across several active planning and development initiatives:
-

In August, the Board of Adjustment heard an appeal of a staff decision to deny a permit
request to demolish a beach walkway that has historically been treated as shared HOA

7
Page 8 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes
-DRAFTSeptember 2026
property. Staff had determined that a single individual lacked unilateral authority to request its
demolition. The Board of Adjustment upheld staff's decision. Director Wyatt noted that the
matter may be appealed to Superior Court and committed to keeping the Board informed.

-

Septic Health Advisory Committee / DWI Zero-Interest Loan Program: The Town sent targeted
letters to approximately 280 property owners whose properties are low-lying, adjacent to a
water body, and have no recent septic maintenance history on file with Dare County Health.
The letters informed recipients of the availability of a zero-interest loan for septic
improvements. Response has been strong, with approximately 25 inquiries received and
multiple inspection appointments scheduled with the Town's inspector.

-

The Town has been experiencing intermittent performance issues with groundwater loggers
purchased from Hydromet. Staff have been in contact with East Carolina University (ECU)
researchers who are conducting grant-funded groundwater and water quality work in the
area. Following a meeting with ECU, staff plan to invite the ECU researchers to present their
program to the Septic Health Advisory Committee in October to explore potential collaboration
and improve the Town's groundwater monitoring capacity.

-

The Estuarine Shoreline Management Plan continues to move forward, including
implementation of the technical assistance program discussed earlier in the meeting.

-

Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update: An RFQ has been issued, interviews with

-

Director Wyatt reported that in the third and fourth quarters, the planning department
achieved an average permit turnaround time of three to four days, which she characterized as
exceptional. She recognized staff members Chris Trembly, Lily Nieberding, Kim Thompson,
and Greg Daisy for their contributions.

-

Dowdy Park / Art and Culture Programming: Summer programming is winding down.

prospective firms have been conducted, and the Town is now working through firm selection
and scope negotiation.

Upcoming fall events include ongoing yoga sessions, movies in the park, and holiday market
programming. The Art and Culture Committee has also begun planning for a commemoration
of the 150th anniversary of the Huron shipwreck, scheduled for November of the following
year. The effort was initiated by community members Sandy Sanderson and Ralph Buxton,
and the committee is working with staff member Paige Griffin and Roberta to develop
appropriate programming.

Planning Board Members' Agenda
Ms. Netsch noted that the meeting had covered a substantial amount of material and that she
intended to review the documentation provided further before formulating specific comments or
questions.
Mr. Elder suggested that future community outreach on ADUs include visual aids depicting lot
coverage, building height, and site layout comparisons between existing development patterns,
including short-term rental configurations, and what would be possible under a proposed ADU
framework, to help the public more concretely understand the implications of density-related
concerns.

8
Page 9 of 40

Town of Nags Head
Planning Board Minutes

-DRAFT-

September 2026

Mr. Belsches took the opportunity to commend the Town's free septic inspection program,
encouraging all property owners in Nags Head to take advantage of it, and recognized inspector
Connor by name for his professionalism and thoroughness.

Planning Board Chairman’s Agenda
Chair Gwinn expressed appreciation for the engagement and preparation of all board members and
acknowledged the quality and accessibility of the materials prepared by staff. He encouraged the
Board to continue approaching the complex issues before them methodically and in small increments.

Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was made by David Elder. The time was 11:45 AM.
Respectfully submitted,
Lily Campos Nieberding

9
Page 10 of 40

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Planning Board
REGULAR SESSION: October 20, 2026

AGENDA ITEM E.1.
Consideration of a UDO text amendment submitted by Anastasia Forlano to allow cosmetic tattooing as an
accessory use to permitted beauty salon uses within the town.

Prepared by
Kelly Wyatt, Planning Director

Reviewed by
Kelly Wyatt

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Staff supports the limited accessory-use approach because the authorized procedures are closely related to the
beauty services provided within a salon, and the ordinance clearly identifies which procedures are permitted and
which are excluded. The floor-area limitation provides a measurable standard, while the requirement that cosmetic
tattooing remain incidental and subordinate to other salon services ensures that it functions as an accessory use
rather than the principal activity of the business. Staff recommends that the Planning Board recommend adoption of
the proposed text amendment as crafted.
Specific Action Requested
Consideration and recommendation for UDO Text Amendment.
Summary
Applicant Anastasiia Forlano has submitted the attached Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) text amendment
requesting consideration to allow specified cosmetic tattooing procedures as an accessory use within permitted
beauty salons in the C-2, General Commercial Zoning District, subject to supplemental regulations.
The applicant is interested in leasing a unit within a local shopping center and proposes to provide multiple beautysalon services, including cosmetic tattooing. During review of the proposed operation, staff identified cosmetic
tattooing as an activity requiring further consideration. Staff paused approval of that component and explained the
available options, including applying for a text amendment. The applicant subsequently submitted the attached
request, dated September 22, 2026.
The Town currently allows tattoo establishments by special use permit in the C-3, Commercial Services District. This
relatively small district is located in the northern portion of town, contains light-industrial and service uses, and
offers limited street frontage and visibility. The existing allowance does not authorize tattooing at the applicant’s
proposed location.
The applicant describes permanent makeup as a personal-care service intended to enhance, restore, or create the
appearance of facial features, including eyebrows, eyeliner, and lips. Her application distinguishes these procedures
from conventional decorative body tattooing and requests that they be allowed as an accessory service within an
otherwise permitted beauty salon. The application expressly states that the request is not intended to expand the
locations where traditional tattoo establishments are permitted.
During review, staff also identified a need to clarify related terminology within the UDO. The existing Table of Uses
Page 1 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 11 of 40

includes “Hair Salon” but does not separately identify or define “Beauty Salon.” Staff has historically treated these
activities similarly based on their comparable services and operating characteristics. This request provided an
opportunity to update the terminology and establish a Beauty Salon definition that more fully encompasses the
nonmedical beauty services these establishments provide. Definitions for Cosmetic Tattooing, Spa, and Tattoo/Body
Piercing Establishment are also included to distinguish these activities and clarify how they are classified. These
related updates were identified by staff while preparing the amendment and are provided as a supplement to the
applicant’s specific request.
The amendment retains salon eligibility in C-1, C-2, C-4, and C-5 and establishes Beauty Salon with Accessory
Cosmetic Tattooing as a separate use in C-2, subject to supplemental requirements in Section 7.16A.
The proposed accessory allowance is limited to eyebrow pigmentation, eyeliner or lash-line pigmentation, lip
pigmentation, and cheek pigmentation simulating conventional blush. Touch-ups and color corrections would be
allowed only for those procedures and anatomical areas. Other procedures, including decorative body art, lettering,
symbols, freckle or beauty-mark tattooing, scalp micropigmentation, reconstructive tattooing, and tattoo removal,
are expressly excluded.
Cosmetic tattooing must remain incidental and subordinate to an operating beauty salon that provides other
services. Treatment space may occupy no more than 25 percent of the salon’s gross floor area, with the full area of
any room, booth, or station used for cosmetic tattooing counting toward that limit, even when shared with other
services. Cosmetic tattooing must also occur within the same enclosed commercial unit and remain part of the salon
operation. Booth rentals and contracted practitioners are permitted, but all cosmetic-tattooing treatment areas are
counted together. If the principal salon operation ceases, cosmetic tattooing must also cease unless separately
authorized under the Tattoo/Body Piercing Establishment classification.
The proposed distinction is for zoning purposes and does not remove applicable health-permitting requirements.
Cosmetic tattooing remains subject to N.C.G.S. 130A-283 (attached) and applicable sanitation and permitting
requirements administered through Dare County. The ordinance requires practitioners to maintain the necessary
permits and makes clear that zoning approval does not substitute for health permits or professional licenses.
The amendment also includes related updates to the parking and commercial mixed-use provisions. Beauty Salon
and Beauty Salon with Accessory Cosmetic Tattooing are added to the existing Hair Salon parking category for
consistency. The parking requirement remains unchanged at one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area or
two spaces per chair, whichever is greater.
Because the applicant’s proposed location is within a shopping center, which is subject to the Town’s commercial
mixed-use regulations, Section 7.32 is also amended to expressly include Beauty Salon and Beauty Salon with
Accessory Cosmetic Tattooing among the eligible uses. This listing remains subject to the underlying zoning
district’s use allowances and applicable supplemental regulations.
Staff supports the limited accessory-use approach because the authorized procedures are closely related to the
beauty services provided within a salon, and the ordinance specifically identifies what is and is not allowed. The
floor-area limitation provides a measurable standard, while the requirement that cosmetic tattooing remain
incidental and subordinate addresses the overall operation. Meeting the 25-percent limit alone would not authorize
a business whose principal activity is cosmetic tattooing.
The proposed use would be approved administratively upon demonstration of compliance with the supplemental
regulations, rather than requiring a special use permit. Staff considers this appropriate given the narrowly defined
procedures and specific operational limits established by the amendment. Traditional tattoo/body piercing
establishments would remain subject to the existing special use permit requirement in C-3.
Staff recommends that the Planning Board recommend adoption of the proposed text amendment as crafted. The
amendment accommodates a limited range of permanent facial makeup services within an operating beauty salon
Page 2 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 12 of 40

while maintaining the separate classification and approval requirements for traditional tattoo/body piercing
establishments.

Attachments
1.
Cosmetic Tattooing Amendment Attachments

Page 3 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 13 of 40

(DRAFT)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN
OF NAGS HEAD, NORTH CAROLINA AS IT PERTAINS TO ALLOWING COSMETIC
TATTOOING AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO BEAUTY SALONS.
ARTICLE I. Purpose(s) and Authority.
WHEREAS, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160D-701, the Town of Nags Head (the “Town”) may enact
and amend ordinances regulating the zoning and development of land within its jurisdiction and
specifically the location and use of buildings, structures and land; pursuant to this authority and
the additional authority granted by N.C.G.S. Chap. 160D-702, the Town has adopted
comprehensive zoning regulations and has codified the same within the Unified Development
Ordinance, Part II of the Town Code, adopted pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160D-103, which allows
the Town to combine certain land development ordinances into a unified ordinance;
WHEREAS, Section 2.4.4.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance provides that the powers
and duties of the Planning Board include developing and recommending policies, ordinances,
development regulations, administrative procedures, and other means for carrying out plans in a
coordinated and efficient manner;
WHEREAS, Section 3.5.1. of the Town Code makes clear that a zoning ordinance text
amendment may be initiated by motion of the Board of Commissioners, by motion of the
Planning Board, or by application by any person within the zoning jurisdiction of the Town;
WHEREAS, Applicant, Anastasiia Forlano has requested consideration of a UDO text
amendment to allow cosmetic tattooing as an accessory use to permitted beauty salons.
ARTICLE II. Construction.
For purposes of this ordinance amendment, underlined words (underline) shall be considered as
additions to existing Town Code language and strikethrough words (strikethrough) shall be
considered deletions to existing language. Any portions of the adopted Town Code which are not
repeated herein but are instead replaced by an ellipsis (“...”) shall remain as they currently exist
within the Town Code.
ARTICLE III. Amendment of the Unified Development Ordinance.
PART I. That Appendix A – Definitions shall be amended as follows, to add new definition for
“Beauty Salon”, “Cosmetic Tattooing”, “Spa”, and “Tattoo/Body Piercing Establishment”
Beauty Salon means an establishment primarily engaged in providing one or more
nonmedical personal grooming or beauty services, including hair cutting, styling, or
coloring; manicures and pedicures; facials and skin care; waxing, threading, or
tweezing; eyebrow and eyelash services; and application of nonpermanent makeup.
Cosmetic tattooing is not included within this use classification except when expressly
authorized as an accessory use under Section 7.16A. Tattooing and body piercing
otherwise are excluded. Medical or surgical services are not included in this use
classification.

Page 14 of 40

Cosmetic Tattooing means the implantation of ink or other pigment into or beneath
the skin through puncturing with a needle, blade, or other instrument to simulate
conventional facial makeup or enhance the appearance of eyebrows, eyelids, lips, or
cheeks. This term includes permanent makeup and micropigmentation, whether
described or marketed as permanent or semi-permanent.
Spa means an establishment providing nonmedical personal-care and body-treatment
services intended to promote relaxation and personal wellness, including massage,
facials, skin-care treatments, body wraps, and exfoliation. A spa may also provide
beauty-salon services. Overnight accommodation and medical or surgical services are
not included in this use classification. Massage and bodywork therapy remains subject
to all otherwise applicable UDO requirements.
Tattoo/Body Piercing Establishment means an establishment where either or both
of the following services are performed:
(1) Tattooing: The insertion of permanent or semipermanent markings or
coloration, or the production of scars, upon or under human skin through
puncturing by use of a needle or other instrument or method. Tattooing includes
cosmetic tattooing.
(2) Body piercing: The puncturing or perforation of the body to create an opening
for the insertion of jewelry or other ornamentation, excluding piercing of the
earlobe.
For purposes of use classification under this UDO, a beauty salon providing cosmetic
tattooing solely as an accessory use in full compliance with Section 7.16A shall not be
classified as a Tattoo/Body Piercing Establishment. This classification exception does
not change the nature of cosmetic tattooing, as tattooing or exempt the activity from
applicable health permitting requirements. An otherwise lawfully authorized medical
use is not classified as a Tattoo/Body Piercing Establishment by this definition. This
exclusion does not authorize medical services within a beauty salon or spa.

PART II. That Section 6.6, Table of Uses and Activities shall be amended as follows:
Commercial Districts
Use
Use Type
Category/Class
Service
Hair Salon

CR

C-1

C-2

P

P

C-3

C-4

C-5

P

P

Supplemental
Regulations

Page 15 of 40

Commercial Districts
Use
Use Type
Category/Class
Service
Banking Institution
Service

Beauty Salon

Service

Beauty Salon with
Accessory Cosmetic
Tattooing

CR

C-1

C-2

P

P

P

P

C-3

C-4

C-5

P

P

PR

Supplemental
Regulations

7.16A

PART III. That Section 7.16.A, Supplemental Regulations for Beauty Salon with Accessory
Cosmetic Tattooing, be created as follows:
Section 7.16.A – Beauty Salon with Accessory Cosmetic Tattooing
The intent of this section is to allow a limited range of permanent facial makeup
services as incidental and subordinate activities within an operating beauty salon,
while maintaining a separate use classification for traditional tattoo/body piercing
establishments. These standards identify the procedures authorized by this accessoryuse allowance and establish requirements for zoning review and continued
compliance.
Beauty Salons with Accessory Cosmetic Tattooing is permitted in accordance with
Section 6.6, Table of Uses and Activities, subject to all other applicable requirements of
this UDO and the following supplemental regulations:
7.16.A.1. Authorized Procedures.
7.16.A.1.1. Cosmetic tattooing provided as an accessory use to a beauty salon
shall be limited to the following procedures:
7.16A.1.1.1. Eyebrow pigmentation. Microblading, microshading, powder
brows, and machine created hair stroke brows, confined to the eyebrow
area to simulate eyebrow hair or eyebrow makeup.
7.16A.1.1.2. Eyeliner pigmentation. Eyeliner or lash-line pigmentation,
confined to the eyelid along the lashine.
7.16A.1.1.3. Lip pigmentation. Lip liner, lip blush, and full lip coloring,
confined to the lips and their border.
7.16A.1.1.4. Cheek pigmentation. Pigmentation confined to the cheeks to
simulate the appearance of conventional blush makeup.

Page 16 of 40

7.16A.1.2. Touch-ups and color corrections shall be permitted only for the
procedures and within the anatomical areas specified in Section 7.16A.1.1.
7.16A.1.3. No other tattooing or body-piercing procedures shall be permitted
under this accessory-use allowance. Excluded procedures include decorative
pictures, lettering, symbols, or body-art designs; freckle or beauty-mark tattooing;
scalp micropigmentation; reconstructive tattooing, including scar or stretch-mark
camouflage and areola or breast repigmentation; and tattoo removal.
7.16A.1.4. The use of a different technique, device, pigment, trade name, or
marketing description shall not authorize a procedure outside the procedures and
anatomical areas specified in this section.
7.16A.2. Accessory Status.
7.16A.2.1. The establishment shall operate as a beauty salon providing services
other than cosmetic tattooing. Cosmetic tattooing shall remain incidental and
subordinate to those services and shall not be established or operated as a
standalone principal use.
7.16A.2.2. Areas used for cosmetic tattooing shall occupy no more than twentyfive percent (25%) of the gross floor area of the beauty salon. The full area of
each room, booth, or treatment station used for cosmetic tattooing shall count
toward this limit, even if that space is also used for other services. Shared
reception, restrooms, and circulation areas shall not count as cosmetic-tattooing
treatment space.
7.16A.2.3. Cosmetic tattooing shall be provided within the same enclosed
commercial unit as the beauty salon and remain part of that salon's operation.
Booth rental or contracted practitioners are permitted, but all cosmetic-tattooing
services within the salon shall be counted together for compliance with this
section, regardless of separate practitioner ownership or payment arrangements.
A separately occupied commercial unit does not qualify as accessory to an
adjacent salon.
7.16A.2.4. If the principal beauty-salon operation ceases, cosmetic tattooing shall
also cease unless separately authorized under the Tattoo/Body Piercing
Establishment use classification. The salon owner or operator is responsible for
maintaining compliance with the accessory-use limitations.
7.16A.3. Permits and Documentation
7.16A.3.1. Before cosmetic tattooing begins, the salon owner or operator shall
obtain the zoning approval required by this UDO. The submittal shall include a
floor plan identifying the salon area and all cosmetic-tattooing rooms or stations;
a complete list of proposed procedures; the other beauty services to be provided;
and a description of how the operation will comply with the floor-area limits and

Page 17 of 40

maintain the cosmetic tattooing as accessory and incidental to other salon
services.
7.16A.3.2. Before adding a procedure or enlarging or relocating cosmetictattooing treatment space, the owner or operator shall submit the change for
zoning review. Approval shall be based on compliance with this section and other
applicable UDO requirements.
7.16A.3.3. Before performing cosmetic tattooing, each practitioner shall obtain
and maintain the tattooing permit required by G.S. 130A-283, unless exempt
under that statute. All applicable establishments, professional licensing,
sanitation, and health requirements shall also be met. Copies of required permits
shall be provided to the Town before services begin and upon renewal or
replacement.
7.16A.3.4. Zoning approval does not substitute for any required health permit or
professional license. A health permit or professional license does not authorize a
service prohibited by this section. A practitioner whose required permit expires or
is suspended or revoked shall cease the services affected until the permit is
valid.

PART IV. That Section 10.16, Required Parking by Use, Table 10-2 be amended as follows:

Use
Category/Class
Service

Use Type

Required Parking

Hair Salon/Beauty
Salon/Beauty Salon with
Accessory Cosmetic Tattooing

One parking space for each 200 square feet of
gross floor area or two parking spaces per
chair, whichever is greater.

PART V. That Section 7.32, Uses allowed within Commercial Mixed-Use Developments
shall be amended as follows:
Section 7.32 - General Provisions.
The following provisions related to Commercial Mixed-Use apply to any of the
following uses from the table in Section 6.6: Commercial with Accessory Residential,
Group Development, Mixed-Use Development, Multiple Principal Uses, and Shopping
Centers. In any Commercial Mixed-Use development, uses are limited to the
categories and uses listed below. Please note that if a use is listed below however it is
not permitted within the zoning district in the table in Section 6.6, it shall not be
permitted as part of a Commercial Mixed-Use development within that zoning district.
7.32.3. Service.

Page 18 of 40

• Personal Service.
o

Hair Salon/Beauty Salon/Beauty Salon w/ Accessory Cosmetic
Tattooing

PART VI. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby
repealed. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the ___ day
of ____ 2026.
Benjamin Cahoon, Mayor
ATTEST:
Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Attorney
Date adopted:
Motion to adopt by Commissioner
Motion seconded by Commissioner
Vote:

AYES

NAYS

Page 19 of 40

Part 11. Tattooing.
§ 130A‑283. Tattooing regulated.
(a)
Definition. – As used in this Part, the term "tattooing" means the inserting of
permanent markings or coloration, or the producing of scars, upon or under human skin
through puncturing by use of a needle or any other method.
(b)
Prohibited Practice. – No person shall engage in tattooing without first obtaining a
tattooing permit from the Department. Licensed physicians, as well as physician assistants and
nurse practitioners working under the supervision of a licensed physician, who perform
tattooing within the normal course of their professional practice are exempt from the
requirements of this Part.
(c)
Application. – To obtain a tattooing permit, a person must apply to the Department.
Upon receipt of the application, the Department, acting through the local health department,
shall inspect the premises, instruments, utensils, equipment, and procedures of the applicant to
determine whether the applicant meets the requirements for a tattooing permit set by the
Commission. If the applicant meets these requirements, the Department shall issue a permit to
the applicant. A permit is valid for one year and must be renewed annually by applying to the
Department for a permit renewal.
(d)
Violations. – The Department may deny an application for a tattooing permit if an
applicant does not meet the requirements set by the Commission for the permit. The
Department may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a permit if it finds that tattooing is being
performed in violation of this Part. In accordance with G.S. 130A‑24(a), Chapter 150B of the
General Statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act, governs appeals concerning the
enforcement of this Part.
(e)
Limitation. – A permit issued pursuant to this Part does not authorize a person to
remove a tattoo from the body of a human being. Compliance with this Part is not a bar to
prosecution for a violation of G.S. 14‑400. (1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 670, s. 1.)

G.S. 130a-283

Page 1
Page 20 of 40

Page 21 of 40

Page 22 of 40

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTIONS
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2026
1.

Call to order - Mayor Pro Tem Lambert called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. A moment of silence
was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. She then recognized former Mayor Bob Muller in attendance.

2.

Agenda – The board adopted the October 7th agenda as presented. Mayor Cahoon was not present and
excused.

3.

Recognition –
PRESENTATION – Fire Chief Randy Wells presented Fire Lieutenant Mark Edwards with a Meritorious
Action Award for his courageous actions during a June 5, 2026, ocean rescue, when he entered the
water to assist a distressed swimmer and continued providing care until EMS arrived, helping contribute
to a successful outcome. He was congratulated by the board.
NEW EMPLOYEE – Police Chief Perry Hale introduced Police Officer Amanda White who was welcomed
by the board to town employment.
NEW EMPLOYEE – Police Chief Perry Hale introduced Police Officer Tanner Grogan who was welcomed
by the board to town employment.
NEW EMPLOYEE – Facilities Maintenance Superintendent Steven Saunders introduced Facilities
Maintenance Heavy Equipment Operator Ben Vorndran who was welcomed by the board to town
employment.
FIVE YEARS – Sanitation Superintendent Eddie Williams introduced Sanitation Equipment Operator Crew
Leader David Davenport, who was recognized by the board for five years of service.

4.

Public Comment –
Basil Belsches – NH resident – Spoke in support of the Nags Head’s continued use of automatic license
plate readers (ALPRs), noting the police department’s September 2 presentation and transparency portal
provide information about how the technology is used, and encouraged the board to keep the cameras
in place to support public safety.
Mary Kelley – NH resident – asked what local officials were doing to inform constituents about the three
proposed state constitutional amendments on the upcoming election ballot, expressing concern that the
income tax cap and property tax limit amendments could hinder local governments’ ability to provide
services, and encouraged voters to oppose the amendments. She also asked that a decision on the flock
cameras be made soon.
Mike Mischou – NH resident – Spoke in support of Nags Head’s continued use of automatic license plate
readers (ALPRs), citing his 27 years in law enforcement and experience with the technology, and
encouraged the board to continue supporting the police department’s use of ALPRs under established
policies and procedures.

Page 23 of 40

BOC Actions
October 7, 2026

5.

Consent Agenda – The Consent Agenda was approved as presented and consisted of the following:
- Consideration of Budget Amendment #4 to FY 26/27 Budget
- Consideration of Tax Adjustment Report
- Approval of Minutes

6.

Public Hearing – The board unanimously adopted the ordinance and the statement of consistency for a
zoning text amendment to the UDO submitted by George E. Goodrich to amend Section 7.2.2., Size and
Arrangement, of the Supplemental Regulations for Cottage Courts to establish an alternative to the
graduated unit size and story distribution requirements, allowing all cottage units to be limited to one story
and a maximum of 1,000 square feet of habitable floor area.

7.

Planning Director – Planning Director Kelly Wyatt summarized her monthly report and was thanked by
the board for her efforts.

8.

Planning Director – Deputy Planning Director Joe Costello gave an update on the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan. The board appointed Comr. Harrison to serve on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan
project team. The board directed staff to solicit applications for four at-large members to the soon to be
established Parks and Recreation Steering Committee.

9.

Committee Reports
Comr. Vaughan – reported on the Dare County Tourism Board’s September 28 meeting. Topics included
the Get Low: Outer Banks car event, approval of nearly $225,000 in event grants for 31 applicants,
authorization to engage outside counsel regarding restricted occupancy tax funds, and occupancy and
meals tax revenues that remained generally flat compared with the prior year.
Comr. Sanders – reported that he was encouraged by the progress of the Estuarine Shoreline
Management Plan and reported that the Dare Housing Foundation is moving forward positively.
Comr. Harrison – reported that Government Access Channel is recruiting for a channel manager and
working on LPDI grants, and that Public Information Officer Roberta Thuman is developing a video
highlighting past hurricanes and how Nags Head has evolved its policies and response following storms
such as Irene and Isabel.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert – noted that Planning Director Wyatt’s Septic Health Advisory Committee report
was well presented and the committee’s next meeting is October 26th.

10.

Appointments/Reappointments to Town Boards/Committees - The board appointed John Kenny to the
NH Firefighters’ Relief Fund Board for a three-year term. The board reappointed Jeanne Kramer to the
Personnel Grievance Panel for a three-year term. The board reappointed David Thompson to the
Planning Board for a three-year term.

11.

Comr. Vaughan – Praised the Nags Head Police Department for a successful and well-attended National
Night Out at Dowdy Park, and thanked staff and emergency personnel for their hard work in keeping
Nags Head safe during the unexpected activity surrounding the Get Low: Outer Banks car event.

2

Page 24 of 40

BOC Actions
October 7, 2026

12.

Comr. Sanders – Thanked everyone who stepped up and assisted with Get Low: Outer Banks car event,
noting that the event grew significantly larger than anticipated.

13.

Comr. Harrison – praised the Nags Head Police Department for managing the Get Low: Outer Banks car
event, thanked staff for quickly cleaning up after the nor’easter, and noted the upcoming Nags Head
Fire Department open house on Thursday, October 8th.

14.

Mayor Pro Tem Lambert – Discussed community feedback regarding ALPR cameras and e-bikes, noting
that the board will continue gathering public input before taking action. In response to comments
regarding the recent Get Low: Outer Banks car event, Mayor Pro Tem Lambert asked Manager Garman
to clarify the ownership, development, and management of the Soundside Event Site, as well as the
approval and permitting processes for events held there.

15.

Adjournment – The board adjourned at 10:15 a.m.

3

Page 25 of 40

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Planning Board
REGULAR SESSION: October 20, 2026

AGENDA ITEM H.1.
Presentation by John DeLucia of Albemarle & Associates, Ltd. and representatives of the Rogallo Foundation
regarding the Foundation’s mission and plans for a proposed aviation center and museum.

Prepared by
Lily Nieberding, Permitting Coordinator

Reviewed by
Lily Nieberding
Lily Nieberding

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Presentation and Discussion only
Specific Action Requested
No action needed.
Summary
John DeLucia of Albemarle & Associates, Ltd. and representatives of the Rogallo Foundation will provide an
overview of the Foundation, its mission, and its plans for a proposed aviation center and museum in Nags Head.
The presentation will include discussion of the museum’s goals and anticipated programming and operations,
providing an opportunity for the Planning Board to learn more about the proposal and ask questions.
The applicant has requested additional time to work with staff on any UDO text amendments that may be needed.
No ordinance language or action is proposed for consideration at this meeting.
Attachments
None

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 26 of 40

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Planning Board
REGULAR SESSION: October 20, 2026

AGENDA ITEM H.2.

Continued discussion of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). No ordinance amendments or specific regulatory changes

are proposed for consideration at this meeting.

Prepared by
Kelly Wyatt, Planning Director

Reviewed by
Kelly Wyatt
Lily Nieberding

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Discussion only
Specific Action Requested
Discussion and guidance on next steps.
Summary
At its September 15th, 2026 meeting, the Planning Board continued its review of the Town’s prior consideration of
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and identified several topics for additional discussion. Staff intends to provide a
presentation at the October 20th, 2026 meeting addressing these follow-up items and continuing the conversation
about what an ADU ordinance should accomplish.
The presentation will include a discussion of density, including common planning definitions and the different ways
residents may understand or experience density within their neighborhoods. Staff will distinguish dwelling-unit
density from population, building size, lot coverage, and other site characteristics, with examples illustrating how an
additional dwelling unit may or may not change the physical development or occupancy of a property. This
discussion is intended to establish a shared vocabulary while recognizing the range of considerations relevant to
evaluating attached and detached ADUs.
Staff will also provide additional information about temporary family health-care structures, commonly called
“granny pods,” and an update on available feedback from neighboring jurisdictions regarding ADU participation,
implementation, and enforcement. The Planning Board will continue discussing the housing needs and policy
objectives a potential ADU ordinance should address.
No new ordinance language or specific regulatory changes are proposed for consideration at this meeting.
Attachments
None

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 27 of 40

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Planning Board
REGULAR SESSION: October 20, 2026

AGENDA ITEM H.3.
Discussion of Commercial Outdoor Recreation Overlay District (CORD) in relation to the Comprehensive Plan
Character Areas and potential amendments to the UDO.

Prepared by
Lily Nieberding, Permitting Coordinator

Reviewed by
Lily Nieberding

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Discussion item.
Specific Action Requested
No action requested.
Summary
Last month, staff updated the Planning Board on new development and recent planning work within the Commercial
Outdoor Recreation Overlay District. Staff also provided an update that the town would be handling the larger CORD
small area planning effort by working through a series of text amendments to work through at subsequent meetings to
better align the UDO with Comprehensive Plan's vision for the area.
The town has recently partnered with Destination by Design to create an updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
The updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan will contemplate issues that are relevant to the CORD, including
soundside access generally and the feasibility/demand of the boardwalk expansion at this location, in particular. Thus,
staff is working through the text amendments and land use issues while boardwalk, pedestrian infrastructure and
soundside access can be more thoroughly vetted through the Parks and Recreation Master Plan process.
The map below serves as a good reference for existing outdoor recreation uses in the CORD, and illustrates recently
approved or constructed hotel developments.

Page 1 of 5

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 28 of 40

The Soundside Activity Node, which closely overlaps with the CORD, is envisioned to develop "as a high-quality, mixed
use area and prime location for recreational uses and hotel development. Further, the area is highly desirable for
additional dining opportunities and local, boutique style shopping that is designed as a planned, highly walkable,
destination type development. Mixed use development should utilize vertical and horizontal development with groupings
of commercial, dining, office, and accommodations. This area was identified as appropriate for hotel development with a
desire for a more specialty, boutique-type hotel. Additionally, there is a preference for groupings of smaller scale
buildings over a single, massive structure."
The use category "commercial mixed uses" includes commercial with accessory residential, group development, mixeduse development, multiple principal uses and shopping centers. Commercial with accessory residential is allowable by
right in select commercial districts with supplemental regulations. The other commercial mixed uses contain
supplemental regulations and are only allowed via a special use permit in select commercial districts in town.
Last month, Section 8.5.2.4 was shown on the presentation slide and was described as essential to be revised. This
Section 8.5.2.4, effectively requires a property owner to choose between:
a commercial outdoor recreational use with only a very limited accessory commercial component; or
a principal C-2 use without any CORD recreational use
Text amendments being considered should allow commercial outdoor recreation use(s) and compatible C-2 use(s) on
the same property. It should also remove the requirement that every non-recreational use be "accessory and
subordinate" to the recreational use.
Text amendments, to accomplish correcting inconsistencies between the Comprehensive Plan and UDO, should aim to
allow compatible commercial mixed uses within a unified development, such as mini golf and a restaurant, Go-Karts
Page 2 of 5

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 29 of 40

and coffee shop, An aerial Adventure Park and a retail shop, etc. Each use must still independently satisfy applicable
parking, wastewater, building code, lot coverage, access, landscaping, lighting and supplemental regulations, except as
the UDO expressly authorizes shared facilities.
Section 8.5.2.4 must be changed to allow commercial mixed-use developments via special use permits in the CORD with
an outdoor recreation use. Below is one example way in which this could be handled and 'point' to the supplemental
standards and uses already in section 7.32.

8.5.2.4.
Uses Allowed. The underlying zoning district to the Commercial-Outdoor Recreational Uses Overlay District is the C-2
General Commercial Zoning District. The outdoor recreational uses allowed in this district may be allowed as stand-alone
uses or in combination with other outdoor recreational uses. Outdoor recreational uses may also be combined with
certain uses allowed in the underlying C-2 zoning district. However, when any non-recreation related use is combined
with a recreation use, the non-recreation use must be accessory and subordinate to an outdoor recreation use. In this
instance, only the following uses shall be allowed as accessory to an outdoor recreation use and shall be contained
within the principal building: a special use permit with applicable supplemental regulations will be required. Only the
following uses shall be allowed as accessory to an outdoor recreation use and shall be contained within the principal
building
Section 8.5.2. lists the following commercial uses as accessory to an outdoor recreation use and shall be contained
within the principal building.
1. Concession
2. Amusement Arcade
3. Restaurant
4. Retail
5. Single family dwelling
Perhaps, removing restaurant and retail to allow as non-accessory uses to outdoor recreation while keeping the other
three would be appropriate but needs to be discussed.
All these uses are further contextualized in section 7.32 of the UDO. The related supplemental regulations are included
in full here:
Section 7.32 - General Provisions.
The following provisions related to Commercial Mixed-Use apply to any of the following uses from the table in Section
6.6: Commercial with Accessory Residential, Group Development, Mixed-Use Development, Multiple Principal Uses, and
Shopping Centers. In any Commercial Mixed-Use development, uses are limited to the categories and uses listed below.
Page 3 of 5

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 30 of 40

Please note that if a use is listed below however it is not permitted within the zoning district in the table in Section 6.6,
it shall not be permitted as part of a Commercial Mixed-Use development within that zoning district.
7.32.1. Residential.
• Cottage Courts.
• Dwelling, Single-Family.
• Dwelling, Two Family.
• Dwelling, Multi-Family.
• Home Occupations.
7.32.2. Retail.
• Art Gallery.
• Art Gallery - Owner Occupied.
• Beach Recreation Equipment Rental/Sales.
• Bicycle Shop (repair, retail, rental).
• Convenience Store.
• Food/Grocery Store.
• Furniture Store.
• General Retail, including clothing, gifts, candy, toys, shoes, jewelry, notions, beach equipment, bakery, antiques,
hobby goods, magazines/comics, crafts, dry goods, gifts, musical instruments, bookstores, sporting goods (and the
incidental manufacturing, repair, or service of goods on the premises).
• Hardware Store.
• Pet Shop/Dog Grooming.
• Pharmacy.
7.32.3. Service.
• Personal Service
• Group Fitness — Aerobics/Dance/Karate/Yoga.
• Hair Salon.
• Indoor Fitness/Gymnasium.
• Massage Therapy Center.
• Metaphysical Wellness Services.
• Spa.
• Food Service
• Coffee Shop/Juice Bar.
• Ice Cream Shop
• Microbreweries
• Restaurant, Neighborhood
• Restaurant, Sit Down
• Restaurant, Take Out
7.32.4. Office.
• Building Contractor's Office
• Professional Office, including General Business, Financial, Real Estate Sales, Insurance, Attorney, Accountant,
Mortgage
7.32.5. Institutional.
• Governmental Administrative Office.
• Libraries.
• Religious Complexes
7.32.6. Medical.
• Medical Offices.
Page 4 of 5

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 31 of 40

7.32.7. Accessory Uses.
• Outdoor Stands — Accessory to Shopping Centers and Group Development.
Water based recreation uses were recently added as allowable as 7.32.8 during the August BOC meeting. It has yet to
be updated in MUNICODE.
7.32.8. Recreation
• Water Dependent Recreational Uses, including Watercraft Rental, Non-Powered/Powered.
Currently, mixed-use developments can occur in the C2 district, the underlying zoning district in the CORD, via a special
use permit and supplemental regulations. The qualifying language, shown above at the top of section 7.32 “in any
Commercial Mixed-Use development are limited to the categories and uses listed below. Please note that if a use is
listed below however is not permitted within the zoning district in the table in Section 6.6, it shall not be permitted as
part of a Commercial Mixed-Use development within that zoning district," limits uses added in this section that are
exclusively allowed in the CORD from being allowed as part of commercial mixed uses in other areas of town. This was
demonstrated by the addition of water-based recreation uses during the August meeting in this section.
The uses shown as allowed in section 7.32 via special use permit reflect most of the uses described as desirable in the
Comprehensive Plan except a few, namely, land-based recreation uses, general recreation uses, bed and breakfasts and
'boutique' hotels. Some uses shown in 7.32 are not considered desirable in the CORD as specifically described in the
Comprehensive Plan. However, all mixed-use developments under a special use permit would require planning board
review and BOC approval.
Today's presentation and planning work will focus on how we should address allowing commercial mixed uses in the
CORD to align with the Comprehensive Plan's vision. Some key questions that need to be answered are:
1. What uses are appropriate to include as allowable with commercial outdoor recreational uses? (added to 7.32).
2. What uses are appropriate to keep as accessory only to commercial outdoor recreation uses? Section 8.5.4.2.

Attachments
None

Page 5 of 5

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 32 of 40

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Planning Board
REGULAR SESSION: October 20, 2026

AGENDA ITEM H.4.
Continued discussion of potential UDO amendments related to tree preservation.

Prepared by
Lily Nieberding, Permitting Coordinator

Reviewed by
Lily Nieberding
Lily Nieberding

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Discussion only.
Specific Action Requested
Discussion and guidance on next steps.
Summary
At its September 15th, 2026 meeting, the Planning Board reviewed examples of vegetation removal and landdisturbing activities that have presented challenges for staff in applying and enforcing the Town’s existing
regulations. That discussion identified a need for clearer definitions and more consistent language addressing
vegetation preservation, removal, and required mitigation.
To continue that review, staff has compiled an inventory of relevant Town Code and UDO provisions, including
district-specific protections, tree-removal permitting, landscaping and buffering, and land-disturbance requirements.
The attached spreadsheet identifies these provisions and highlights differences in terminology, tree-measurement
methods, and thresholds. Staff’s presentation will address these inconsistencies and potential revisions to improve
clarity and enforcement.
Staff is seeking Planning Board feedback on the issues identified and direction on potential ordinance revisions. This
discussion is intended to guide preparation of amendments for future consideration; no ordinance changes are
proposed for action at this meeting.
Attachments
1.
Tree-Vegetation-References

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 33 of 40

Nags Head UDO: Trees and Vegetation
Category

Section

Applicability

Measurement

Summary

Definitions

A.4

UDO definitions

Tree; tree removal; land-disturbing activity

Also defines forest canopy/sub-canopy and mature buffer. Tree removal includes acts causing death within two years, such as root
damage, soil compaction, grade change, excessive pruning and harmful paving.

District protections

8.4.2.2.1–.4

SPD-20

20-ft building perimeter

Restricts disturbance areas. Permit required before site preparation. Stake proposed structures, accessways and drainfields for Town
inspection before removal/disturbance.

District protections

8.4.2.2.5

SPD-20

Hazardous, dead or diseased trees

Staff may approve removal under stated conditions. Arborist report may be required. Topping is tree removal.

District protections

8.4.3.3.2;
8.4.3.4.2.8–.10

SED-80

Forest and dune protection zones

Protect ridge-line forest and specified Roanoke Sound/estuarine dune areas through no-removal/no-disturbance areas. Consult exact
boundaries and exceptions.

District protections

8.4.3.4.1

SED-80 site plans

Tree locations and protection

Identify removal areas, tree protection and grade/drainage changes affecting trees. Stake building site and clearly mark trees
proposed for removal.

District protections

8.4.3.4.2.11;
8.4.3.4.3.1

SED-80

Minimize disturbance

Minimize access clearing, including understory. Favor sites requiring least alteration of vegetation, topography and groundwater
systems.

District protections

8.4.3.5–.6

SED-80

Mitigation and restoration

Native revegetation, notification before removal, repair of tree damage, compliance inspections, restoration/replacement and
enforcement.

District protections

8.5.4.5.1–.4

SRO Soundside overlay

10-ft building perimeter

Limits disturbance areas. Permit, staking and inspection before site preparation/tree removal/earth disturbance.

District protections

8.5.4.7

SRO alternative standards

At least 10-ft elevation differential; 70% disturbance
cap

Qualifying properties may disturb anywhere within lot, limited to 70% of area, subject to associated grading/fill/retaining-wall standards.

Land disturbance

4.11.4

Permit types

Filling, grading, clearing and drainage

Land-disturbance permit may accompany zoning/building/floodplain permits. Stormwater management approval may also be
required.

Land disturbance

11.5.4.3.2.3 and .7 Residential stormwater plans Vegetation and erosion controls

Show significant existing vegetation, proposed preservation/planting areas and erosion/sediment-control measures.

Land disturbance

11.22.2

Exclusions

Specified activities

Lists qualifying agricultural, forestry, mining, state-jurisdiction and emergency exclusions from this Part.

Land disturbance

11.22.3 and .6

Regulated disturbance

Plan threshold: greater than 5,000 sq ft

Land-disturbance permit required before regulated activity. Sedimentation plan required above 5,000 sq ft. Aggregate lands
developed as a unit.

Land disturbance

11.22.4

Boundary and ROW drainage Sediment fencing
swales

Take reasonable measures to protect property. Install secured/staked sediment fencing along disturbance abutting property
boundaries or ROW drainage swales.

Land disturbance

11.23.2

Exposed graded slopes/fills

21 calendar days

Provide temporary/permanent cover or adequate devices/structures to restrain erosion.

Land disturbance

11.23.4

More than 5,000 sq ft
uncovered

15 working or 90 calendar days, whichever shorter

Retain sediment during construction and provide permanent groundcover after completion. Subject to HQW provision. Deadlines are
as codified; state permits may add requirements.

Land disturbance

11.23.5–.6; 11.24

Erosion-control plans

Prior approval and compliance

Plan submission, approval, implementation, amendments, inspections and notification before starting work.

Land disturbance

11.25

Control objectives

Minimize area and duration of exposure

Identify critical areas, control surface water/runoff and prevent off-site sedimentation.

Land disturbance

11.26.5

HQW zones

15 working or 45 calendar days, whichever shorter

Provide groundcover after completion of construction/development. Deadline is as written in codified UDO.

Land disturbance

11.31–11.33; 11.39 Maintenance and restoration

Ongoing controls and corrective work

Maintain controls, implement additional measures where necessary, address existing uncovered areas, and restore areas following
noncompliance.

Preservation and
landscaping

10.5.1.1

Required landscaping and
buffers

Maintain required height

Maintain healthy landscaping. Routine trimming provision excludes live oaks. Limbing up prohibited except dead material removal
specifically authorized by UDO Administrator.

Related Town Code

26-9

Live oaks in every district
(outside UDO)

2 inches DBH or more

Protects live oaks subject to construction, disease/death and hazard provisions. More restrictive district rules prevail. Topping is
unauthorized removal.

Tree measurements

4.9

General permitting

Greater than 6 inches DBH

Tree removal is listed among improvements commonly requiring permits. Clearing, grading, grubbing roots, and storing/grading
imported fill are also listed.

Tree measurements

7.4.5.2

Large residential dwellings

3 ft height; 1 inch diameter at 6 inches above grade

Planting option: at least 50% locally adapted evergreen trees. Remaining forbs/shrubs at least 1.5 ft. East of NC 12/SR 1243,
evergreen shrubs substitute for trees.

Tree measurements

8.4.2.2.1

SPD-20

Greater than 4 inches DBH

Land disturbance and removal limited to specified building, access, septic, and grading areas.

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.1.1.6

SED-80 site plans

At least 16 inches DBH

Identify trees within building site and specified 20-ft building and 5-ft access/facility perimeter areas.

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.2.3

SED-80

16 inches or greater caliper

Removal prohibited, including within building/septic/drive/utility areas, subject to referenced exception.

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.2.4

SED-80

Greater than 4 inches DBH

Removal prohibited except in specified development areas or under referenced exception.

Page 34 of 40

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.2.5

SED-80

Less than 4 inches DBH

Small trees, weeds, vines, bushes and similar vegetation may be removed without land disturbance. Leave litter, mulch and topsoil
undisturbed. Western dune slopes have additional prohibitions.

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.2.9.5

SED-80 estuarine dune
grading

Greater than 4 inches caliper

Relocated sand must not damage existing trees above this threshold.

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.2.12

SED-80 uncovered decks

Greater than 4 inches DBH

Deck extensions are limited by tree-removal and grading/land-disturbance restrictions.

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.3.1.4–.4.2

SED-80 Board review

Greater than 4 inches DBH; greater than 16 inches
DBH

Board review of removal for specified site/construction needs. Separate restrictions and cross-referenced exceptions for trees greater
than 16 inches DBH.

Tree measurements

8.4.3.4.3.2.1

SED-80 single-family review

16 inches DBH or greater

Administrative site-plan approval requires that no trees at or above this threshold are requested for removal.

Tree measurements

8.5.4.5.1

SRO Soundside overlay

Greater than 4 inches diameter at 1 ft above
ground

Land disturbance and removal limited to specified development areas. Measurement is not stated as DBH.

Tree measurements

10.2.1.2

Existing plants credited
toward requirements

Circumference at 6 inches above grade

Plan identifies number, location, species, height and circumference of existing live trees/shrubs used for buffering and preservation.

Tree measurements

10.93.3.8.1

Applicable commercial/siteplan projects

6 inches or greater caliper

Retain healthy trees in public rights-of-way or undeveloped required yards unless removal approved at site-plan review, subject to
access/safety provisions.

Tree measurements

10.93.3.8.3.1

Planting instead of
preservation

3 ft height; 1 inch diameter at 6 inches above grade At least 50% of required planting material must be locally adapted trees. Remaining shrubs at least 1.5 ft tall. At least half of
vegetation in front or side yards.

Tree measurements

10.93.3.9

NCDOT right-of-way

Greater than 4 inches caliper at 1 ft above ground

Obtain approval from both NCDOT and Town before removal. Unauthorized removal is subject to civil penalties.

Page 35 of 40

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Planning Board
REGULAR SESSION: October 20, 2026

AGENDA ITEM H.5.
Planning & Development Directors Report – October 7th, 2026

Prepared by
Lily Nieberding, Permitting Coordinator

Reviewed by
Lily Nieberding
Lily Nieberding

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Please find attached a monthly update from Planning Director Kelly Wyatt that includes permitting and code
enforcement data through August 2026.
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board information and update.
Summary
This memo provides an overview of selected Planning and Development Department activities, projects, and
initiatives. If requested, staff will be prepared to discuss any of this information in detail at the Board of
Commissioners meeting on Wednesday, October 7, 2026.
Monthly Activity Report
In addition to permitting, inspections, code enforcement, and Todd D. Krafft Septic Health Initiative activities, staff
were involved in the following meetings or activities of note during the month of September:
• Tuesday, September 1st — Technical Review Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, September 2nd — Last Night 2026 Summer Concert Series at Dowdy Park
• Wednesday, September 2nd — Board of Commissioners Meeting
• Wednesday, September 9th — Arts and Culture Committee Meeting
• Thursday, September 10th — Board of Adjustment Meeting (no hearings)
• Tuesday, September 15th — Planning Board Meeting
• Wednesday, September 16th — Board of Commissioners Mid-Month (not needed)
• Fridays, September 11th and 25th — Movie Nights at Dowdy Park
Planning Board — Pending Applications and Discussions
At its September 15, 2026 meeting, the Planning Board continued its review of the town’s previous consideration of
accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and discussion of the Commercial Outdoor Recreation Overlay District (CORD). The
board also received a presentation and held preliminary discussions regarding potential UDO amendments related to
tree preservation. No ADU ordinance amendments or regulatory changes were discussed. With ADUs identified as a
Strategic Plan initiative, staff is first providing historical context to ensure the board understands the town’s
previous efforts before considering possible changes. This review is expected to continue over several months.
The Planning Board’s next meeting is scheduled for October 20, 2026. The anticipated agenda includes:
Page 1 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 36 of 40

• Consideration of a UDO text amendment submitted by Anastasiia Forlano to distinguish cosmetic
tattooing/permanent makeup from a traditional tattoo establishment and allow it as an accessory service
within an otherwise permitted beauty salon.
• Consideration of a UDO text amendment to address Session Law 2026-51 and its limitations on local
regulation of “no-impact home-based businesses.”
• Continued discussion of ADUs, Vegetation Preservation revisions, and the Commercial Outdoor Recreation
Overlay District (CORD).
Board of Adjustment – Recent and Pending Applications — There were no items for the Board of
Adjustment's consideration in September 2026.
Additional Updates
• DWMP/Septic Health Advisory Committee — The next Septic Health Advisory Committee meeting is
scheduled for Monday, October 26, 2026. Staff continue to receive inquiries and inspection requests
following the town wide mailer as well as the targeted mailing to approximately 280 properties identified as
potentially vulnerable based on septic-system age, elevation, and proximity to surface waters. This
sustained interest is encouraging and provides opportunities to help property owners understand their
septic-system needs and available assistance.
Staff are also working with Jocelyn Billings, a UNC-Chapel Hill senior majoring in Public Policy, through the
university’s Outer Banks Field Site internship program. Jocelyn is assisting Environmental Planner Conner
Twiddy with septic inspections and collecting GPS locations of septic tanks and drain fields. She is also
collaborating with Deputy Planning Director Joe Costello to incorporate these findings into the town’s
mapping tool for septic infrastructure and historical records. This work strengthens the information available
to support future outreach and planning. Jocelyn is also helping develop marketing and outreach ideas to
encourage participation in the Septic Health Initiative. She is expected to attend the October SHAC meeting,
and staff hope to introduce her and highlight her work at the Board of Commissioners’ November meeting.
• Estuarine Shoreline Management Plan — Staff continue to advance shoreline resiliency projects and have
updated the ESMP website to reflect project progress and changes. Interest is growing in the board-funded
technical assistance grants for private soundside property owners interested in living shorelines or
incorporating natural features into existing shoreline stabilization. The grant agreement is finalized, and staff
are preparing to launch the opportunity.
Harvey/Soundside Event Site Living Shoreline Project: The major permit application remains under review
following revisions to address wetland impacts. Staff and consultants are evaluating agency comments and
potential design adjustments to address concerns about continued access for kite and wind sports. The
Tourism Board’s attorney continues working with the town and NC Land and Water Fund to develop a
conservation easement that protects the Tourism Board’s interests in the property while meeting grant
requirements. Grant extensions have been requested due to permitting delays, with construction tentatively
anticipated in January 2027.
Villa Dunes Drive: Staff and Environmental Professionals, Inc. continue working with property owners to
identify practical shoreline stabilization alternatives that address their concerns and support ESMP goals.
Soundside Road: Staff have requested an RCCP grant scope change to focus on a resiliency berm and
stormwater improvements in place of offshore breakwaters. The project aims to reduce wave overtopping,
enhance habitat, and protect infrastructure. Draft easement language has been shared with property
owners, and additional outreach is planned as consultants finalize the concept design. Permit submission is
anticipated in January 2027, with design development and permits targeted for April 2027.
Page 2 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 37 of 40

Catfish Farm/Causeway: An RCCP grant scope change has been approved to fund living shoreline design at
the Catfish Farm/Causeway area as an alternative to offshore breakwaters at Villa Dunes and Soundside
Road. The project will explore natural shoreline treatments, potentially including oyster reefs, to reduce
erosion, protect wetlands and Causeway infrastructure, and support habitat and water quality. The design
area includes town-owned conservation land and adjoining private properties. Living shoreline
improvements have been confirmed as allowable under the existing conservation easement.
• Parks and Recreation Plan Update — Deputy Planning Director Joe Costello will provide an update on the
Parks and Recreation Plan at the October 7, 2026, Board of Commissioners meeting under agenda item G-2.
• Dowdy Park Events/Farmers Market/Holiday Markets/Art & Culture — Programming is transitioning into fall
and winter following a successful summer season. Yoga in the Park concludes this month after record
participation, with support from Coastal Carolina Vacations & Sales. Family movie nights continue on
October 2nd, 9th, and 23rd, building on strong attendance previously.
Preparations are underway for Dowdy Park Holiday Markets on Saturday, November 14th, November 28th,
and December 12th, with the Annual Dowdy Park Tree Lighting scheduled for November 28th. Vendor
applications for the holiday markets open on Wednesday, October 14th, at 8am with spaces filled on a firstcome, first-served basis once application requirements are met.
Additional October activities include a collaboration with the North Carolina Aquarium to add native plants to
Dowdy Park’s pollinator garden and a children’s fish-printing program with Merv Rubiano of Strategic Angler
Custom Lures at Whalebone Park on Wednesday, October 21st.
At its September 9, 2026, meeting, the Committee for Arts & Culture reviewed seasonal programming and
began exploring ideas for Dowdy Park’s 10th anniversary and the 150th anniversary of the USS Huron
shipwreck, both in 2027. Discussions also included future Art Mast installations.
Upcoming Meetings and Other Dates
• Tuesday, October 6th — Technical Review Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, October 7th — Board of Commissioners Meeting
• Thursday, October 8th — Board of Adjustment Meeting (no hearings)
• Thursday, October 8th — Parks and Recreation Kick-Off Meeting
• Wednesday, October 14th — Arts and Culture Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, October 14th — Holiday Market Application opens at 8am.
• Tuesday, October 20th — Planning Board Meeting
• Wednesday, October 21st — Board of Commissioners Mid-Month (if needed)
• Wednesday, October 21st — Fish Printing with the Strategic Angler at Whalebone Park
• Fridays, October 9th and 23rd — Movie Nights at Dowdy Park
• Monday, October 26th — Septic Health Advisory Committee (SHAC) Meeting
Attachments
1.
10 G1 Planning Monthly Report

Page 3 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 38 of 40

Page 39 of 40

Page 40 of 40