On the agenda: Nags Head Board of Commissioners Meeting — ALPR (Oct 7)

A.

AGENDA
TOWN OF NAGS HEAD BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
NAGS HEAD MUNICIPAL COMPLEX – BOARD ROOM
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2026; 9:00 AM
REGULAR SESSION
CALL TO ORDER/MOMENT OF SILENCE/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

B.

ADOPTION OF AGENDA

C.

RECOGNITION
1.

PRESENTATION – Meritorious Action Award – Fire Lieutenant Mark Edwards
NEW EMPLOYEE – Police Officer Amanda White – July 6, 2026
NEW EMPLOYEE – Police Officer Tanner Grogan – August 3, 2026
NEW EMPLOYEE – Facilities Maintenance Heavy Equipment Operator Ben Vorndran – August 19, 2026
FIVE YEARS – Sanitation Equipment Operator Crew Leader David Davenport – September 13, 2021

D.

PUBLIC COMMENT

E.

CONSENT AGENDA

F.

1.

Consideration of Budget Amendment #4 to FY 2026/27 Budget

2.

Consideration of Tax Adjustment Report

3.

Approval of Minutes

PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.

G.

H.

Public Hearing for a UDO Text Amendment Submitted by George E. Goodrich to Amend Section 7.2.2.,
Size and Arrangement, of the Supplemental Regulations for Cottage Courts to Establish an Alternative
to the Graduated Unit Size and Story Distribution Requirements, Allowing all Cottage Units to be Limited
to One Story and a Maximum of 1,000 Square Feet of Habitable Floor Area.

REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1.

Update from Planning Director

2.

Discussion of Parks and Recreation Master Plan

NEW BUSINESS
1.

Committee Reports

2.

Consideration of Appointments/Reappointments to Boards/Committees
- NH Firefighters' Relief Fund Board
- Personnel Grievance Panel
- Planning Board

Page 1 of 72

I.

ITEMS REFERRED TO AND PRESENTATIONS FROM TOWN ATTORNEY

J.

ITEMS REFERRED TO AND PRESENTATIONS FROM TOWN MANAGER

K.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA

L.

MAYOR’S AGENDA

M.

CLOSED SESSIONS

N.

OTHER BUSINESS

O.

ADJOURNMENT

Page 2 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM C.1.
PRESENTATION – Meritorious Action Award – Fire Lieutenant Mark Edwards
NEW EMPLOYEE – Police Officer Amanda White – July 6, 2026
NEW EMPLOYEE – Police Officer Tanner Grogan – August 3, 2026
NEW EMPLOYEE – Facilities Maintenance Heavy Equipment Operator Ben Vorndran – August 19, 2026
FIVE YEARS – Sanitation Equipment Operator Crew Leader David Davenport – September 13, 2021

Prepared by
Brittany Phillips, Town Clerk

Reviewed by
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Welcome and Congratulations!
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board recognition.
Summary
Recognition at the October 7, 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting will include the above-listed items.
Attachments
None

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 3 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM E.1.
Consideration of Budget Amendment #4 to FY 2026/27 Budget

Prepared by
Amy Miller, Deputy Town Manager/Finance Officer

Reviewed by
Amy Miller
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
There is a justification included under the budget amendment which explains the purpose of the amendment.
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board review and approval.
Summary
Attached please find Budget Amendment #4 to the FY 2026/27 Budget which is provided for board review and
approval at the 10/7/2026 Board of Commissioners meeting. Budget Amendment #4 is in accordance with the FY
2026/27 Budget Ordinance, adopted at the June 3, 2026 meeting.
Attachments
1.
10 E1 Budget amend 4 to FY26-27

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 4 of 72

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST
FY 2026-2027

SOURCE OF FUNDS
CODE

ACCOUNT

10-499000

General Fund
Revenues
Appropriated Fund Balance

AMOUNT

CODE

2,215,499.32

410-544500
420-532000
420-544000
420-577200
440-532000
440-543300
441-532001

490-544003
490-544500
490-577400
500-577350
530-543500
530-544500
530-577350
610-532000
610-543300
610-543600
610-543605
625-544500
730-532000
730-543300
730-543900
730-577400
730-577500
792-544000
TOTAL CHARGES

$ 2,215,499.32

BUDGET AMENDMENT NO.
Amendment
USE OF FUNDS

4
4.1

ACCOUNT

AMOUNT

General Fund
Expenditures
Governing Body
CONTRACTED SERVICES
Town Manager
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
PROFESSIONAL FEES
CAPITAL OUTLAY BUILDINGS
Admin. Services
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
Information Technology
COMPUTER TRAINING
INTERNET COSTS
MAINT/REPAIR EQUIPMENT
CONTRACTED ANNUAL SUPPORT
Planning and Development
PROFESSIONAL FEES FROM THE CIF
CONTRACTED SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT
Public Services Administration
CAPITAL OUTLAY IMPROVEMENTS
Facilities Maintenance
MAINT/REPAIR BUILDINGS
CONTRACTED SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY IMPROVEMENTS
Police
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
MAINT/REPAIR EQUIPMENT
MAINT/REPAIR FIRING RANGE
Streets and Stormwater
CONTRACTED SERVICES
Fire
TRAVEL AND TRAINING
DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
UNIFORMS
CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT
CAPITAL OUTLAY VEHICLES
Ocean Rescue
PROFESSIONAL FEES

TOTAL CREDITS

1,120.00
2,000.00
65,275.00
1,293,974.46
560.00
1,660.00
1,920.00
816.63
1,358.03
19,112.29
20,000.00
13,753.78
3,384.00
351,722.27
46,375.00
26,933.00
2,293.72
1,000.00
14,602.60
1,641.28
4,648.85
25,230.59
2,266.07
2,246.00
1,647.00
11,325.00
297,253.75
1,380.00
$ 2,215,499.32

JUSTIFICATION
Fiscal Year 2026 carry over encumbrances - General Fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
RECOMMENDED BY
POSTED TO GENERAL LEDGER:

DATE

9/30/2026

APPROVED BY BOC:

DATE

INITIALS

Page 5 of 72

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST
FY 2026-2027

SOURCE OF FUNDS
CODE

ACCOUNT

61-499100

Water Fund
Revenues
Appropriated Net Position

AMOUNT

CODE

248,120.76

720-544000
725-577500
815-577350
815-544500
815-577300
815-577407

TOTAL CHARGES

$

248,120.76

BUDGET AMENDMENT NO.
Amendment
USE OF FUNDS

4
4.2

ACCOUNT

AMOUNT

Water Fund
Expenses
Water Administration
PROFESSIONAL FEES
Septic Health
CAPITAL OUTLAY VEHICLES
Water Operations (Services)
CAPITAL OUTLAY IMPROVEMENTS
Water Distribution (Services)
CONTRACTED SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY OTHER
CAPITAL OUTLAY INFRASTRUCTURE

TOTAL CREDITS

10,000.00
46,348.00
123,204.76
23,578.00
41,790.00
3,200.00
$

248,120.76

JUSTIFICATION
Fiscal Year 2026 carry over encumbrances - Water Fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
RECOMMENDED BY
POSTED TO GENERAL LEDGER:

DATE

9/30/2026

APPROVED BY BOC:

DATE

INITIALS

Page 6 of 72

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST
FY 2026-2027

SOURCE OF FUNDS
CODE

ACCOUNT

49-492000

Capital Reserve Fund
Revenues
Transfer-General Fund

10-499000

General Fund
Revenues
Fund Balance Appripriated

TOTAL CHARGES

AMOUNT

112,761.00

$

CODE

BUDGET AMENDMENT NO.
Amendment
USE OF FUNDS

4
4.3

ACCOUNT

AMOUNT

Capital Reserve Fund
Expenditures
949-590087 Contributions to Fund Balance
(Beach Nourishment Restricted MSD Sales Tax)

112,761.00

General Fund
Expenditures
Transfer-Capital Reserve Fund

112,761.00

900-590082

112,761.00

TOTAL CREDITS

112,761.00

$

112,761.00

JUSTIFICATION
Rebudget for NC CAMA grant for FY 26 expenditures, but received funds in FY 26.
The funds were for the June St. beach access and were paid for from the beach nourishment
MSD restricted reserve. The grant funds will be put back into that account.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
RECOMMENDED BY
POSTED TO GENERAL LEDGER:

DATE

9/30/2026

APPROVED BY BOC:

DATE

INITIALS

Page 7 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM E.2.
Consideration of Tax Adjustment Report

Prepared by
Jessica Gallop, Tax Collector

Reviewed by
Jessica Gallop
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
N/A
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board review and approval.
Summary
Attached please find the list of adjustments to the 2026 Tax Levy (per information received from Dare County) for
the monthly Property and MSD valuations.
These reports are submitted for your approval at the October 7, 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting.
Attachments
1.
10 E2 Tax Adj Town-Wide Report
2.
10 E2 Tax Adj MSD Report

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 8 of 72

Town of Nags Head, North Carolina
ANALYSIS OF CURRENT 2026-2027 TOWN WIDE TAX LEVY
2026 Tax Levy As of September 28, 2026 - Oct 7 BOC

Town-Wide Tax
Property
Valuation
Original levy:
Property taxed at current 2026 rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at current 2026 rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2025 year's rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2024 year's rate
Penalties
Total

Rate

5,181,492,243
2,677,493
11,257,453
40,491

0.002320
0.002320
0.003300
0.003300

5,195,467,680

Total Levy
Property Excluding
Registered
Registered
Motor
Motor Vehicles
Vehicles

Total
Levy

12,022,270.49
6,211.78
37,149.59
133.62
6,640.74

12,022,270.49

12,072,406.23

12,028,911.23

6,236.54
26,117.29
116.30
6,640.74
32,470.13

Deferred:
Circuit Breaker
Total

Discoveries & Adjustments:
Current year discoveries & adjustments tax
Town wide beach nourishment tax
Corporate Utilities discoveries & tax
Corporate Utilities beach nourishment tax
Penalty Discoveries
Total
Releases & Adjustments:
Current year releases & adjustments
Town wide beach nourishment
Penalty Releases
Total

0.00
-

-

0

Net levy

0.00

211,765,456

0.00
0.00
448,942.77
42,353.09
0.00

0.00
0.00
448,942.77
42,353.09
0.00

211,765,456.00

491,295.86

491,295.86

(230,805)

(645.60)
(46.17)
0.00

(489.33)
(46.17)
0.00

(156.27)

(230,805)

(691.77)

(535.50)

(156.27)

(0.06)

(0.06)

Write-offs (under $1.00) or Adjustments:
Total Property Valuation

-

5,407,002,331
12,551,985.39

12,519,671.53

32,313.86

Uncollected Taxes & Penalties
Uncollected Town Wide Beach Nourishment
TOTAL UNCOLLECTED TAXES AS OF 09/28/26:

(6,990,562.02)
(655,712.44)
(7,646,274.46)

(6,990,562.02)
(655,712.44)
(7,646,274.46)

0.00
0.00
0.00

CURRENT YEAR TAXES COLLECTED:

4,905,710.93

4,873,397.07

32,313.86

39.083%

38.926%

0.000%

CURRENT LEVY COLLECTION PERCENTAGE:

Page 9 of 72

Town of Nags Head, North Carolina
ANALYSIS OF CURRENT 2026-2027 MSD TAX LEVY
2026 Tax Levy As of September 28, 2026 - Oct 7 BOC

BEACH NOURISHMENT DISTRICT
MSD
Valuation
Original MSD Levy:
MSD Beach Nourishment at Current 2026 Dist 1 Rate
MSD Beach Nourishment at current 2026 Dist 2 Rate
MSD Beach Nourishment at Current 2026 Dist 3 Rate
MSD Beach Nourishment at Current 2026 Dist 4 Rate
MSD Beach Nourishment at Current 2026 Dist 6 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at Current 2026 Dist 1 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at Current 2026 Dist 2 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at Current 2026 Dist 3 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at Current 2026 Dist 4 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at Current 2026 Dist 5 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at Current 2026 Dist 6 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2025 Dist 1 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2025 Dist 2 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2025 Dist 3 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2025 Dist 4 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2025 Dist 6 Rate
Registered Motor Vehicles at 2024 rate
Penalties
Total

Discoveries & Adjustments:
Current year discoveries & adjustments

Total
Releases & Adjustments:
DMV Current year valuation adjustments
DMV Current year tax releases
Real/Personal Current year releases & adjustments
Total

Rate

963,073,061
826,069,583
1,757,945,905
1,184,830,878
0
239,670
503,364
1,389,220
1,006,808
0
0
434,119
907,379
2,013,101
1,637,608
0
0

0.00090
0.00090
0.00005
0.00010
0.00000
0.00090
0.00090
0.00005
0.00010
0.00000
0.00000
0.00143
0.00143
0.00005
0.00010
0.00005
0.00143

Net levy
TOTAL UNCOLLECTED MSD AS OF 9/28/26:
CURRENT YEAR MSD COLLECTED:
CURRENT MSD COLLECTION PERCENTAGE:

Registered
Motor
Vehicles

866,765.78
743,462.66
87,898.77
118,483.27
0.00
234.52
485.36
69.46
100.68
0.00
0.00
620.79
1,297.55
100.66
163.76
0.00
0.00
0.00

866,765.78
743,462.66
87,898.77
118,483.27
0.00

4,740,050,696

1,819,683.26

1,816,610.48

0

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0

0.00

0.00

0
0
(23,288)

0.00
(10.66)
(1.93)

0.00
0.00
(1.93)

0.00
(10.66)

(23,288)

(12.59)

(1.93)

(10.66)

0.00

0.00

Write-offs (under $1.00) or Adjustments:
Total MSD Valuation

MSD Excluding
Registered
Motor Vehicles

Total
Levy

107.37
228.93
34.58
42.54
0.00
0.00
283.35
597.31
64.11
122.33
0.00
133.62

1,614.14

4,740,027,408
1,818,212.03

1,816,608.55

1,603.48

(1,112,423.45)

(1,112,423.45)

0.00

705,788.58

704,185.10

1,603.48

38.818%

38.764%

0.000%

Page 10 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM E.3.
Approval of Minutes

Prepared by
Brittany Phillips, Town Clerk

Reviewed by
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
N/A
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board review and approval.
Summary
Attached for board review and approval are the following DRAFT Board of Commissioners meeting minutes:
September 2, 2026 Regular Session
Attachments
1.
10 E3 Sep 2 2026 DRAFT BOC mins

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 11 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

DRAFT MINUTES
TOWN OF NAGS HEAD
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR SESSION
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2026
The Nags Head Board of Commissioners met at the Board Room located at 5401 S Croatan Highway, Nags Head,
North Carolina on Wednesday, September 2, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. for a Regular Meeting.
Board Members Present:

Mayor Ben Cahoon; Mayor Pro Tem Megan Lambert; Comr. Bob Sanders
Comr. Megan Vaughan; and Comr. Molly Harrison

Board Members Absent:

None

Others Present:

Town Manager Andy Garman; Attorney John Leidy; Amy Miller; Kelly Wyatt; David
Ryan; Perry Hale; Randy Wells; Chris Montgomery; Nancy Carawan; Joe Costello;
Roberta Thuman; Karen Snyder; Shane Hite; Katie Anzalone; Meredith Booth; Chance
Ducharme; Justin Allen; Chase Hundley; Greg South; Ann-Marie South; Trey Lipscomb;
David Perry; Valerie Perry; Renée Cahoon; Webb Fuller; Bob Muller; Mary Kelley; Anna
Sadler; Rick Godsey; Michael O’Brien; Nancy O’Brien; Donna Creef; Ray Schoonmaker;
Michael Alvarez; Christian Aguirre; Gene Perry; Catherine Heath; Donna Sills; Melissa
George; Nate Jones; Hunter Freeman; Harold Turberville; Melanie Bortz-Brewer;
Charles Duncan; Julio Valcarcel; and Town Clerk Brittany A. Phillips

Mayor Cahoon called the meeting to order at 09:00 a.m. A moment of silence was followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance. He then recognized former Mayors Renée Cahoon and Bob Muller and former Commissioners Webb
Fuller and Anna Sadler, who were in attendance.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
MOTION: Comr. Sanders moved to adopt the September 1st agenda as presented. The motion was seconded by
Comr. Vaughan, which passed unanimously.
RECOGNITION
NEW EMPLOYEE – Public Services Director Nancy Carawan introduced Water Services Technician Chance
DuCharme, who was welcomed by the board to town employment.
NEW EMPLOYEE – Public Services Director Nancy Carawan introduced Water Services Technician Justin Allen, who
was welcomed by the board to town employment.
FIVE YEARS – Planning Director Kelly Wyatt introduced Building Inspector I Chase Hundley, who was recognized
by the board for five years of service.
TWENTY YEARS – Police Chief Perry Hale introduced Police Sergeant III Greg South, who was recognized by the
board for twenty years of service.
TWENTY YEARS – Police Chief Perry Hale introduced Police Detective III Trey Lipscomb, who was recognized by the
board for twenty years of service.
RETIREMENT – Public Services Director Nancy Carawan introduced former Water Operations Superintendent David
Perry, who was thanked and congratulated by the board on his retirement.
PROCLAMATION – Septic Smart Week – September 14 – 18, 2026
Planning Director Kelly Wyatt introduced the proclamation highlighting the Todd D. Krafft Septic Health Initiative.
Mayor Cahoon recognized the Town of Duck's recent efforts in septic health, and then read the proclamation for
Septic Smart Week as follows:
"WHEREAS, proper septic system use and routine care are vital to protecting public health and preserving our highly
valued groundwater and surface waters; AND
'WHEREAS, proper septic system maintenance will preserve the function, performance, and longevity of systems
thereby avoiding costly repairs that can result from neglect; AND
1

Page 12 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

'WHEREAS, nearly 85 percent of homes and most businesses in the Town of Nags Head rely on septic systems to
treat wastewater; AND
'WHEREAS, the Todd D. Krafft Septic Health program established by the Town of Nags Head provides education to
its property owners about the need for proper septic system use and routine maintenance; AND
'WHEREAS, the Todd D. Krafft Septic Health program encourages proper maintenance by offering free inspections
of conventional septic systems and a $250 water bill credit each time the system tank is pumped; AND
'WHEREAS, if a conventional system is found in need of repair or replacement, the town offers low interest loans to
assist in replacing all or a portion of the septic system; AND
'WHEREAS, residents and the environment of the Town of Nags Head benefit from properly designed, installed,
operated, and maintained septic systems.
'NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners does hereby proclaim
the week of September 14–18, 2026 as Septic Smart Week in the Town of Nags Head and urges all citizens to join
us in this special observance by considering what they can do to properly maintain their septic system."
MOTION: Comr. Vaughan moved to approve the Septic Smart Week proclamation as presented. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lambert, which passed unanimously.
PROCLAMATION – Diaper Need Awareness Week – September 14 – 20, 2026
Mayor Cahoon presented the Children & Youth Partnership proclamation emphasizing the importance of providing
diapers to those in need.
Mayor Cahoon noted the importance of supporting young families, particularly given the impact of inflation on
families with small children, and then read the Diaper Need Awareness Week Proclamation as follows:
"WHEREAS, diaper need, the condition of not having a sufficient supply of clean diapers to keep babies and toddlers
clean, dry, and healthy, can adversely affect the health and well-being of babies, toddlers, and their families; and
'WHEREAS, national research reports that 1 in 2 families struggle to secure enough diapers to keep their children
clean, dry, and healthy due to insufficient income; and
'WHEREAS, a daily or weekly supply of diapers is generally an eligibility requirement for babies and toddlers to
participate in child care programs and quality early-education programs; and
'WHEREAS, without enough diapers, babies and toddlers risk infections and health problems that may require
medical attention, and may prevent parents from attending work or school, thereby hurting the family’s economic
prospects and well-being; and
'WHEREAS, addressing diaper need strengthens families, reduces poverty-related stressors, and fosters healthier,
more equitable communities; and
'WHEREAS, the Town of Nags Head is proud to be home to trusted community-based organizations including
Children & Youth Partnership for Dare County that recognize the importance of diapers in ensuring health and
providing economic stability for families and thus distribute diapers to families through various channels.
'WE, THE TOWN OF NAGS HEAD, do hereby proclaim the week of September 14 – 20, 2026 as DIAPER NEED
AWARENESS WEEK.
'We thank Children & Youth Partnership, their staff and donors for their service through CYP’s Diaper Bank and
encourage the citizens of our community to support CYP’s Diaper Bank to help ensure that all Dare County children
and families have what they need to thrive."
MOTION: Comr. Harrison moved to approve the Diaper Need Awareness Week Proclamation as presented. The
motion was seconded by Comr. Sanders, which passed unanimously.
PROCLAMATION – Fire Prevention Week – October 4 – 10, 2026
Deputy Fire Chief Shane Hite reported on the upcoming Fire Prevention Week, scheduled for October 4 – 10, 2026.
He noted that Charge into Fire Safety: Safe Charging Is a Superpower – is this year’s theme. He invited everyone to
attend the Fire Prevention Open House scheduled for Thursday, October 8th, starting at 5:00 p.m. at Douglas
Remaley Fire Station #16.
Mayor Cahoon read the proclamation as follows:
"WHEREAS, the Town of Nags Head is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all those living in The Town
of Nags Head and visiting; and
'WHEREAS, fire remains a serious public safety concern both locally and nationally, and the presence of lithium-ion
2

Page 13 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

batteries in many household devices introduces unique fire risks; and
'WHEREAS, most of the electronics used in homes daily, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, power tools, ebikes, e-scooters, and toys, are powered by lithium-ion batteries, which if misused, damaged, or improperly
charged, can overheat, start a fire, or explode; and
'WHEREAS, the National Fire Protection Association® (NFPA®) reports an increase in battery-related fires,
underscoring the need for public education on the safe use of lithium-ion batteries and devices; and
'WHEREAS, the way lithium-ion battery devices are charged can make a difference in helping prevent home fires;
and
'WHEREAS, safe charging includes using the cord and charger that came with your device or one approved by the
manufacturer, charging on a hard, flat surface, watching for warning signs like devices that are very hot or start to
swell, unplugging when fully charged, and charging larger devices like e-bikes outside and away from exits; and
'WHEREAS, residents are encouraged to understand that safe charging means making smart choices every time
they plug in; and
'WHEREAS, The Town of Nags Head's first responders remain dedicated to reducing the occurrence of fires through
prevention, safety education, and community outreach; and
'WHEREAS, the 2026 Fire Prevention Week™ theme, “Charge into Fire Safety™: Safe Charging Is a Superpower,”
serves to remind all residents that safe charging can help reduce the risk of fires in homes and communities;
'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners does hereby proclaim
October 4 – 10, 2026, as Fire Prevention Week throughout Nags Head, and urge all residents to learn about and
practice safe charging habits. All town residents and visitors are invited to attend the annual Nags Head Fire Rescue
Open House, held at the Douglas A Remaley Fire Station 16 on Thursday, October 8, 2026, from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m."
MOTION: Comr. Sanders moved to approve the proclamation identifying October 4 – 10, 2026 as Fire Prevention
Week as presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Vaughan, which passed unanimously.
Mayor Cahoon noted that two Dare County solid waste trucks caught fire as a result of batteries, underscoring the
seriousness of the issue.
PROCLAMATION – National Night Out – October 6, 2026
Police Chief Perry Hale summarized the upcoming National Night Out activities scheduled for October 6th at Dowdy
Park.
Mayor Cahoon read the Proclamation for National Night Out as follows:
"WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is sponsoring a unique, nationwide crime, drug and
violence prevention program called “National Night Out” which is celebrated by communities in August and in early
October; AND
'WHEREAS, the Town of Nags Head, the Nags Head Community Watch Association, and the Nags Head Police
Department are celebrating National Night Out on Tuesday, October 6th, 2026; AND
'WHEREAS, the Annual National Night Out provides a unique opportunity for the Town of Nags Head to join forces
with thousands of other communities across the country in promoting cooperative, police-community crime
prevention efforts; AND
'WHEREAS, the Nags Head Community Watch Association plays a vital role in assisting the Nags Head Police
Department through joint crime, drug and violence prevention efforts in the Town of Nags Head and is supporting
“National Night Out 2026” locally; AND
'WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of the Town of Nags Head be aware of the importance of crime programs
and the impact that their participation can have on reducing crime, drug and violence in the Town of Nags Head;
AND
'WHEREAS, police-community partnerships, neighborhood safety, awareness and cooperation are important themes
of the “National Night Out” program.
'THEREFORE, I do hereby call upon all citizens of the Town of Nags Head to join the Nags Head Community Watch
Association, the Town of Nags Head Police Department, and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting
the 43rd Annual National Night Out on October 6th, 2026.
'FURTHER, Let it be resolved that the Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners does hereby proclaim Tuesday,
October 6th, 2026 as “National Night Out” in the Town of Nags Head, Dare County, North Carolina."
3

Page 14 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

MOTION: Comr. Vaughan moved to approve the National Night Out Proclamation as presented. The motion was
seconded by Comr. Harrison, which passed unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Town Attorney John Leidy opened Public Comment at 09:33 a.m.
Chris Greening – NH Business Owner – emailed the board prior to the meeting expressing support for the
continued use of ALPR cameras for legitimate law enforcement purposes, while emphasizing the importance of
privacy safeguards, restricted access, documented investigations, auditing, and accountability for misuse.
Jeff DeMartino – NH resident – emailed the board prior to the meeting expressing support for Dare County’s
decision to remove ALPR cameras, citing concerns that the technology could constitute a breach of privacy and that
information collected could potentially be accessed or misused, which he believe violates the Fourth Amendment.
Melanie Bortz-Brewer – KDH resident – opposes the continued use of ALPR cameras, citing privacy and
constitutional concerns, questioning their effectiveness and cost, and urging the board to remove the cameras and
involve the public in such decisions.
Mary Kelley – NH resident – read email on behalf of Randy Cartwright, NH resident, that opposed the town’s
continued participation in the ALPR system, citing concerns about mass surveillance, data sharing, privacy, and
constitutional protections. He urged the board to deactivate and remove the cameras.
Catherine Health – KH resident – provided a handout to the board regarding ALPR abuse and cancellations and
urged them to conduct thorough due diligence regarding ALPR cameras, expressing concerns about their data
collection capabilities, potential misuse, privacy implications, and possible constitutional issues.
Webb Fuller – NH resident – spoke in favor of ALPR cameras as a workforce tool and asked the board to examine
information from both viewpoints before considering another decision on the matter.
Mike O’Brien – NH resident – expressed concern about changing e-bike ordinances, emphasizing that e-bikes and emotos differ in speed and safety features, and urged the board to enforce existing laws rather than restrict
responsible riders of slower, safety-equipped electric tricycles from using multi-use paths.
Renée Cahoon – NH resident – expressed concerns about e-bike safety on the multi-use path along Virginia Dare
Trail, citing heavy use by pedestrians, families, and children and urging the board to prioritize public safety and
consider safety measures for faster electric bikes.
Bob Muller – NH resident – noted he was in favor of ALPR cameras and noted that the original decision to use them
was made at a public meeting and encouraged others to be informed by reading the agendas and either attending
meetings or watching them on YouTube. He then urged the board to discuss drainage improvements and other
project prioritization decisions in open, recorded meetings rather than at a retreat, which is open to the public but
isn’t recorded.
Donna Sills – Outer Banks resident – opposed the use of ALPR cameras, expressing concerns about surveillance,
privacy, public safety, and the lack of public input before their installation, and urged the board to consider the
potential impact on residents and their families.
Anna Sadler – NH resident – spoke in support of the town’s Septic Health Initiative, expressed opposition to ALPR
cameras until the handling of collected data is fully understood, and urged the town to establish and enforce
regulations for e-bikes.
Melissa George – NH resident – spoke in support of responsible e-bike use, urging enforcement of existing laws
against reckless operation while allowing responsible pedal-assist riders to use e-bikes safely on the roadway, and
commended the town’s police officers for their presence and service.
Nate Jones – Outer Banks resident – questioned the cost-effectiveness of ALPR cameras, citing the number of plate
scans compared to arrests or prosecutions attributed to the cameras and expressing concerns about their return on
investment and civil rights implications.
There being no one else present who wished to speak, Attorney Leidy concluded Public Comment at 10:10 a.m.
CONSENT AGENDA
The Consent Agenda consisted of the following items:
- Consideration of Budget Amendment #3 to FY 26/27 Budget
- Consideration of Tax Documents
- FY 26/27 Tax Adjustment Reports (New Year and Year to Date)
- Approval of Minutes
-Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Surplus and Donation of Fitness Equipment Items to the College of
the Albemarle's Basic Law Enforcement Training Program
4

Page 15 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

-Consideration of Resolution Supporting Outer Banks Health Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Application for
Hospital Walking Path Grant
-Consideration of Beach Nourishment Master Plan Capital Project Ordinance Amendment #4 to Close Fund
-Consideration of Resolution Appointing the Tax Collector
-Consideration of Amendment to Traffic Control Map re: No Parking Between Signs - Town Away Zone 4610 Blue
Marlin Way
-Request for Public Hearing for a Zoning Text Amendment Submitted by George E. Goodrich to Amend Section
7.2.2., Size and Arrangement, of the Supplemental Regulations for Cottage Courts to Establish an Alternative to the
Graduated Unit Size and Story Distribution Requirements, Allowing all Cottage Units to be Limited to One Story and
a Maximum of 1,000 Square Feet of Habitable Floor Area.
MOTION: Comr. Sanders moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion was seconded by Comr.
Vaughan, which passed unanimously.
Budget Amendment #3, as approved, is attached to and made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum “A”.
The tax documents to include the FY 26/27 New Year Reports and Year-to-Date Adjustment Reports, as approved,
are attached to and made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum “B”.
The minutes from the August 5, 2026, Regular Session meeting were approved by the board and are on file in the
town clerk’s office and on the town’s website.
The Resolution Authorizing the Surplus and Donation of Fitness Equipment Items to the College of the Albemarle's
Basic Law Enforcement Training Program, as adopted, read in part as follows:
"WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Town of Nags Head, North Carolina desires to surplus and dispose
of certain Town owned property; AND
'WHEREAS, the Town has one (1) bench press, one (1) barbell, and 500 pounds of free weights which were taken
out of service in 2026.
'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Town of Nags Head that:
'In accordance with GS 160A-280. Donations of personal property to other governmental units. The following
described Town owned property is hereby declared surplus and authorized to be donated to College of the
Albemarle’s Basic Law Enforcement Training Program:
Fixed Asset
Number
N/A

Description

Original Cost ($)

(1) bench press, (1)
barbell, 500 pounds
of free weights

N/A

Reason for
Surplus
Items were replaced
as part of
construction of the
new fitness facility

Disposal Method
Donation”

The Resolution Supporting Outer Banks Health Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Application for Hospital Walking
Path Grant, as adopted, read in part as follows:
"WHEREAS, Outer Banks Health has applied for funding through the North Carolina Recreational Trails Program
("RTP") for the development of an ADA-accessible walking path on its hospital campus in the Town of Nags Head;
and
'WHEREAS, the proposed walking path would provide a safe and accessible opportunity for walking and outdoor
recreation and would extend connectivity to the existing Nags Head multi-use path system, supporting broader
pedestrian and recreational connectivity within the community; and
'WHEREAS, the proposed project would provide health and wellness benefits for residents, visitors, hospital
patients, healthcare professionals, and other members of the community; and
'WHEREAS, the proposed project may include accessible walking surfaces, benches, native landscaping, educational
signage, and other amenities that encourage active lifestyles and enhance the surrounding community; and
'WHEREAS, the Town of Nags Head recognizes the importance of creating safe, connected, and accessible
opportunities for walking, bicycling, and outdoor recreation and supports efforts that expand public access to
recreational facilities and promote healthy, active communities; and
'WHEREAS, the Town of Nags Head desires to support Outer Banks Health's application to the North Carolina
Recreational Trails Program for the proposed Hospital Campus Walking Path;
'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Nags Head Board of Commissioners, as follows:
1. The Town of Nags Head supports Outer Banks Health's application to the North Carolina Recreational Trails
5

Page 16 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

Program for the proposed ADA-accessible Hospital Campus Walking Path.
2. The proposed project remains subject to all applicable town ordinances, regulations, review procedures,
and permitting requirements."
The summary sheet for the Consideration of Beach Nourishment Master Plan Capital Project Ordinance
Amendment #4 to Close Fund read in part as follows:
"Task 11 (attached) of the beach nourishment multi-year master plan was not able to be completed per regulatory
agencies. This included a 30-year programmatic permit for our renourishment projects, rather than individual
permits. It was found out during the process that the agencies did not favor that approach. This resulted in a
separate change order reducing the scope and fees, and closing out the master plan work.
'This ordinance will be closed. Remaining funds of $852,143, which includes the original change order amount of
$841,841 plus interest will be moved back to the Capital Reserve Fund and put into the MSD beach nourishment
reserve."
The Beach Nourishment Master Plan Capital Project Ordinance Amendment #4, as adopted, is attached to and
made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum "C".
The Resolution Appointing the Tax Collector, as adopted, read in part as follows:
"WHEREAS, a vacancy exists in the office of the tax collector; AND
'WHEREAS, Jessica Gallop was hired as tax collector for the Town of Nags Head and began working for the town on
July 20, 2026; AND
'WHEREAS, North Carolina General Statute 105-349 requires the governing body of each municipality to appoint
a tax collector to provide the legal basis to levy and collect taxes for the town.
'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Town of Nags Head that Jessica
Gallop is hereby immediately appointed as tax collector for the Town of Nags Head, to serve for so long as she
remains employed by the town in the position of tax collector and until a successor is appointed and qualified, and
is authorized to perform the duties of the tax collector."
The summary sheet for the Consideration of Amendment to Traffic Control Map re: No Parking Between Signs - Tow
Away Zone 4610 Blue Marlin Way, as approved, read in part as follows:
"To help maintain the right-of-way in this area, I am requesting that “No Parking Between Signs – Tow Away
Zone” signs be placed in this location. This would assist the Town in keeping the ROW in order to prevent damage
to underground utilities and prevent staff from having to consistently repair this area to include hydroseeding.

'Police Chief: To help maintain the condition of the right-of-way, it is my recommendation to install No Parking signs
on the west side of Blue Marlin Way adjacent to 4610 to approximately 80 feet north of the property line of 4614
Blue Marlin Way.
'Adopt an ordinance to amend the Traffic Control Map to install "No Parking Between Signs – Tow Away Zone" in
the right-of-way on the west side of Blue Marlin Way adjacent to 4610 to approximately 80 feet north of the
property line of 4614 Blue Marlin Way."
The ordinance, as adopted, is attached to and made part of these minutes as Addendum "D".
The summary sheet for the Request for Public Hearing for a Zoning Text Amendment Submitted by George E.
Goodrich to Amend Section 7.2.2., Size and Arrangement, of the Supplemental Regulations for Cottage Courts to
Establish an Alternative to the Graduated Unit Size and Story Distribution Requirements, Allowing all Cottage Units
to be Limited to One Story and a Maximum of 1,000 Square Feet of Habitable Floor Area, as approved, read in part
as follows:
"George E. Goodrich has submitted a text amendment to Section 7.2.2. of the Unified Development Ordinance to
establish an optional alternative to the existing graduated height and habitable-area requirements for cottage
6

Page 17 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

courts. The current standards require approximately one-third of the cottages to remain one story, one-third to
remain no more than one-and-one-half stories, and one-third to remain no more than two stories, with maximum
habitable areas ranging from 1,500 to 1,750 square feet. Under the proposed alternative, every cottage would be
limited to one story with a code-compliant loft or mezzanine and a maximum of 1,000 square feet of total habitable
area. The existing graduated standards would remain available and unchanged for applicants proposing larger
cottage units.
'Staff finds that the proposed alternative is generally consistent with the traditional scale and character of Nags
Head cottage courts and with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan’s support for smaller scale visitor accommodations.
The amendment would not increase the permitted number of units, reduce setbacks or building separation,
increase lot coverage, or change parking or emergency-access requirements. All other cottage court standards,
including requirements for transient occupancy, unified management, common operation, and residential design,
would remain in effect.
'Staff recommends adoption of the proposed text amendment with revisions clarifying that any loft or mezzanine
must remain less than 50 percent of the floor area below, retain the openness required by the North Carolina
Residential Code, not constitute an attic story, and be included within the 1,000-square-foot maximum habitable
area. Staff also recommends requiring at least two exterior design schemes to provide meaningful variation among
cottages while maintaining a cohesive development.
'Planning Board Recommendation
The Planning Board considered this amendment at its August 18, 2026, meeting and voted unanimously to
recommend adoption of the text amendment as proposed.
'Schedule the required public hearing on the proposed text amendment for October 7, 2026."
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Update from Planning Director
Planning Director Kelly Wyatt summarized her report which read in part as follows:
"This memo provides an overview of selected Planning and Development Department activities, projects, and
initiatives. If requested, staff will be prepared to discuss any of this information in detail at the Board of
Commissioners meeting on Wednesday, September 2, 2026.
'Monthly Activity Report
In addition to permitting, inspections, code enforcement, and Todd D. Krafft Septic Health Initiative activities, staff
were involved in the following meetings or activities of note during the month of August:
• Monday, August 3rd — Meeting with NEST re: lighting
• Tuesday, August 4th — Technical Review Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, August 5th — Board of Commissioners Meeting
• Tuesday, August 11th — Meeting with ECU re: Ground water and Water Quality Dashboard
• Thursday, August 13th — Board of Adjustment Meeting (Appeal of Administrative Decision, Pelican
Street)
• Tuesday, August 18th — Planning Board Meeting
• Wednesday, August 19th — Board of Commissioners Mid-Month (if needed)
• Thursday, August 27th — Attended CRC Meeting re: Septic System Repair
• August 5th, 12th, 19th and 26th — Summer Concert Series at Dowdy Park
'Planning Board — Pending Applications and Discussions
At the Planning Board's August 18th, 2026 meeting, they considered adoption of a zoning text amendment
submitted by George E. Goodrich to amend the Cottage Court supplemental regulations. The amendment would
establish an alternative to the existing graduated unit-size and story-distribution requirements by allowing all
cottage units to be limited to one story and a maximum of 1,000 square feet of habitable floor area. The Planning
Board voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the proposed amendment as presented. The item is included
on the Board of Commissioners’ September 2nd Consent Agenda, with a request to schedule the required public
hearing for October 7th. Planning staff also provided a brief informational presentation reviewing the Town’s history
of considering regulations for accessory dwelling units (ADUs). No amendments or regulatory changes were
discussed. Because ADUs are identified as a Strategic Plan item, staff first want to ensure the Planning Board
understands the Town’s previous efforts before beginning discussion of possible changes. This is expected to be a
multi-month process.
The Planning Board is scheduled to meet September 15th, 2026. The agenda is expected to include continued
discussion of ADUs, continued consideration of the Commercial Outdoor Recreation Overlay District (CORD), and
potential amendments to the Town’s vegetation and landscaping preservation standards. A recent enforcement
matter highlighted several areas where the existing standards may benefit from additional clarification and stronger
protections.
7

Page 18 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

'Board of Adjustment – Recent and Pending Applications
At its August 13th, 2026 meeting, the Board of Adjustment considered an Appeal of an Administrative Decision filed
by Loretta Patrick concerning the Planning Director’s denial of Development Permit Application No. 202600632. The
board voted unanimously to uphold the Planning Director’s decision to deny Development Permit Application No.
202600632, which sought authorization to demolish the existing beach access walkway within the Pelican Park
subdivision, located at 10023C East Pelican Street.
'Additional Updates
• DWMP/Septic Health Advisory Committee — Staff recently mailed approximately 280 targeted letters to
properties identified as potentially vulnerable based on septic-system age, elevation, and proximity to
surface waters. The initial response has been surprisingly quick and encouraging. Environmental Planner,
Conner Twiddy has received approximately 15 inquiries, resulting in 10 inspection requests and at least one
property owner who is likely to pursue assistance through the Division of Water Infrastructure (DWI) zerointerest loan program. This early response is encouraging and suggests that the more personalized
outreach is reaching property owners and helping them better understand and consider their septic-system
needs.
Staff also recently met with faculty and researchers from East Carolina University’s Department of Earth,
Environment and Planning. The meeting provided us with an opportunity to learn more about ECU’s
ongoing research, monitoring projects, and equipment, as well as to discuss potential opportunities for
future collaboration and data sharing. Staff hope to have ECU representatives participate either in person or
virtually at the next Septic Health Advisory Committee meeting in October to share information about their
work with the Committee.
• Estuarine Shoreline Management Plan — The ESMP website has been updated to reflect recent progress on
the Town’s shoreline resiliency projects. Staff continue to receive interest in the technical assistance
funding allocated by the Board for individual property owners and small groups seeking to develop living
shorelines or incorporate natural elements into existing riprap or bulkheads. A policy establishing eligibility,
award criteria, and general grant requirements has been developed for the Board’s review and approval.
For the Harvey/Soundside Event Site project, staff addressed comments regarding continued access for kite
and wind sports by reducing the proposed marsh sill by approximately 50 feet. Permits are now anticipated
in March 2027, with bidding to follow and construction projected for October 2027. A project-specific FAQ
has also been added to the ESMP website.
At Villa Dunes Drive, Environmental Professionals, Inc. continues working with property owners to identify
supported, site-specific shoreline stabilization alternatives. For Soundside Road, staff have requested a
grant scope modification to focus on a nature-based resiliency berm and related stormwater improvements
intended to reduce wave overtopping, enhance habitat, and protect infrastructure. Draft easement
language has been refined based on property-owner feedback. An additional stakeholder meeting is
planned for late September or early October, once the design has progressed enough to include a project
exhibit with the draft easements.
Consultants are also advancing the design of a living shoreline near the Town-owned Catfish Farm and
Causeway properties, including surveying, mapping submerged aquatic vegetation, monitoring water
quality, and developing initial concepts. Ownership of one parcel remains under attorney review, while the
consultant continues coordinating with NCDOT and Sugar Creek, LLC, and moving the project design
forward. Additional information is available on the Town’s Estuarine Shoreline Management Plan webpage.
• Parks and Recreation Plan Update — Staff issued a Request for Qualifications for professional services to
update the Town’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Submittals are due August 28, 2026, and staff will
review the responses received and provide an update at the September Board meeting. Updating the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan was identified as the highest-ranked action item in the Town’s Strategic Plan
(Action Item 2.7).
• Permitting Update — 3rd and 4th Quarter — Below is a summary of the total number of permits accepted
and the average turnaround times. Please note these figures do not include trade permits (e.g., electrical,
mechanical, or plumbing).
2026
Total Permits
Average Turnaround/Days
January

67

4

February

68

4

March

86

3

April

72

3

May

50

3.5

June

41

3
8

Page 19 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

• Dowdy Park Events/Farmers Market/Holiday Markets/Art & Culture — Summer programming at Dowdy Park
is wrapping up after another very successful season. The final Farmers Market was held on August 20th and
was well attended. The Summer Concert Series concludes September 2nd with the band, Birddog, featuring
local musicians Dan and Laura Martier. This year’s concerts drew record attendance, with an average of
approximately 275 attendees and a season-high attendance of 625. All concerts are free and open to the
public.
Fitness programming also continued to grow in popularity. The three-day weekly exercise schedule was
very well received, with strong participation throughout the summer. Wake Up Wednesdays and Fitness
Fridays have concluded for the season, while Tuesday Morning Yoga will continue through early October.
Staff also introduced WERQ as a pop-up fitness class and are exploring opportunities to include it in next
year’s programming.
The Kids Back-to-School Celebration was held August 25th and provided a fun conclusion to the summer
children’s programming. The “Tree of Help,” which introduced children to healthy coping skills, was
especially popular, and staff hope to offer similar activities this fall. Overall, 18 community partners
participated in town park events this season, helping provide a diverse range of activities for residents and
visitors.
Staff are now planning fall and holiday events. The Committee for Arts & Culture will meet September 9th
with a full agenda, including upcoming seasonal programming and initial planning for next year’s 150th
anniversary of the USS Huron shipwreck.
'Upcoming Meetings and Other Dates
• Tuesday, September 1st — Technical Review Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, September 2nd — Last Night 2026 Summer Concert Series at Dowdy Park
• Wednesday, September 2nd — Board of Commissioners Meeting
• Wednesday, September 9th — Arts and Culture Committee Meeting
• Thursday, September 10th — Board of Adjustment Meeting (if needed)
• Tuesday, September 15th — Planning Board Meeting
• Wednesday, September 16th — Board of Commissioners Mid-Month (if needed)
• Fridays, September 11th and 25th — Movie Nights at Dowdy
'Please find attached a monthly update from Planning Director Kelly Wyatt that includes permitting and code
enforcement data through July 2026."
Planning Director Wyatt elaborated on her published report, providing an additional update on the Parks and
Recreation Plan. She noted that the RFQ period has closed and that two firms, McGill Associates and Destination by
Design, will be interviewed in the coming weeks. She noted that updating the Parks and Recreation Plan was
identified as a priority in the town’s Strategic Plan and that moving the project forward will be important.
Mayor Cahoon and the board thanked Director Wyatt for her efforts.
Consideration of Estuarine Shoreline Technical Assistance Funding Policy
Deputy Planning Director Joe Costello introduced this item. The summary sheet read in part as follows:
"In January of 2023, the Town of Nags Head adopted the Estuarine Shoreline Management Plan (ESMP). The plan
is a comprehensive effort to address the management of 17 miles of estuarine shoreline while balancing land use,
ecosystem health, public health, and recreation opportunities. The plan outlines nature-based shoreline protection
remedies that, if applied, will help mitigate the impacts of flooding, storm surge, erosion and wave action on the
estuarine shoreline. Nature-based shoreline protections have added water quality and habitat support benefits.
'Since plan adoption, the town has taken steps to implement living shorelines at identified pilot sites. Currently,
three distinct living shoreline projects are in design or permitting phases. Two of these projects, Soundside Road
and the Catfish Farm, are grant funded through the design and permitting phases. The town will continue to look
for grants for future construction of these projects. The Harvey/Soundside Public Access pilot site is grant funded
through construction. The development of these projects illustrate the town’s commitment to the implementation of
the ESMP. Through outreach in relation to these projects, staff realized that private property owners are generally
supportive of the ESMP and may be interested in developing natural protection on their property. However, some
property owners may be wary of larger town-led projects that require larger interventions and ongoing private
property access by the town for maintenance. Staff realized this was an opportunity to develop a program aimed at
the development of smaller scale living shorelines and ‘greening’ of existing bulkhead and/or riprap revetments.
This program enables the development of smaller projects that can fill in the gap between the default solution of
bulkheading eroding property, or large, town-led projects that require significant staff time and require
environmental consultants, community engagement, major permit applications and long-term maintenance
responsibility.
'Staff has developed a concept available for management of the estuarine shoreline which is similar to the sand
9

Page 20 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

relocation and dune management cost share program available for oceanfront property owners. The program
would offer private property owners up to $1,000 for feasibility analysis, on-site inspections, the development of
site-specific living shoreline concept plans, and assistance with required permit applications. Property owners
would be responsible for permit fees, construction costs, and ongoing maintenance. Attached is the draft policy
for the Board of Commissioner's review.
'Staff welcomes feedback on the draft policy. Staff believes the draft policy is reflective of the direction the board
established for this effort during the budget process."
Comr. Sanders requested that staff explore potential grant opportunities for future maintenance of projects. Deputy
Planning Director Costello stated that town staff hope to serve as a resource to connect private property owners
with organizations that may assist with identifying additional grant funding.
MOTION: Comr. Vaughan moved to adopt the Estuarine Shoreline Technical Assistance Funding Policy as
presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Sanders, which passed unanimously.
The policy, as adopted, is on file in the town clerk's office and on the town's website.
NEW BUSINESS
Consideration of Construction Bids for Bonnett Street Stormwater Pump Station - Time Specific 10:30 a.m.
Town Engineer David Ryan introduced this item. The summary sheet read in part as follows:
"The Bonnett Street Stormwater Pump Station project will address recurring flooding associated with low-lying
properties and elevated groundwater along South Wrightsville Avenue between Bainbridge Street and Bonnett
Street. The project includes a stormwater collection system along South Wrightsville Avenue, a pump station at
Dowdy Park, a force main along Bonnett Street, and an underground stormwater storage and infiltration system
beneath the Bonnett Street Beach Access parking area. The project also includes permeable pavement, associated
roadway and parking lot restoration, electrical improvements, controls, and related site work.
'The Town received a $2,356,910 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Local Assistance for
Stormwater Infrastructure Investments (LASII) grant of which $2,087,910 of the total grant was allocated for
construction. The funding award provides 100 percent reimbursement for eligible project costs up to the awarded
amount.
'The project was bid with a base bid amount and two alternates. Bid Alternate No. 1 provided pricing for a duplex
pump station in lieu of the base bid simplex pump station, increasing system redundancy and operational reliability.
Bid Alternate No. 2 provided pricing for replacing a portion of the permeable pavement with conventional asphalt
pavement within the drive aisle areas only.
'Construction bids were opened on July 23, 2026. Three bids were received, with Fred Smith Company submitting
the apparent low base bid of $2,199,271. Following the bid opening, the Town, its design consultant, and the
apparent low bidder completed a value-engineering review to reduce construction costs while maintaining the
project’s intended function and grant-funded scope.
'The value engineering effort included revisions to select quantities, pavement restoration, erosion control
measures, the underground stormwater storage system, site features, and certain improvements to be completed
by Town forces. Through a collaborative review process, the Town, design consultant, and apparent low bidder
identified cost-saving opportunities that preserved the project's intended functionality, stormwater management
objectives, and overall level of service. These efforts enabled the project to remain within the available grant
funding while supporting acceptance of both bid alternates and maintaining a construction contingency, ultimately
enhancing the long-term reliability, resiliency, and performance of the system without requiring additional local
funding.
'The recommended construction contract amount is $1,955,016.00. Staff also recommends establishing a project
contingency of ~7% ($132,894) to address unforeseen conditions, utility conflicts, quantity adjustments, and other
construction-related changes that may arise during construction. The total project authorization would therefore be
$2,087,910, inclusive of contingency.
'Construction is anticipated to begin in fall 2026, with completion targeted for May 2027.
'Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners:
1. Issue a Notice of Award for the Bonnett Street Stormwater Pump Station Project to Fred Smith Company in the
amount of $1,955,016.00, inclusive of Bid Alternate No. 1 (Duplex Pump Station) and Bid Alternate No. 2 (Modified
Parking Lot Pavement Improvements).
2. Establish a construction contingency of $132,894.00, representing approximately 7% of the construction
contract, to address unforeseen site conditions, utility conflicts, quantity adjustments, and other constructionrelated changes that may arise during implementation.
3. Authorize the Town Manager to execute the construction contract and all associated project documents
following receipt of the required funding agency approvals and review by the Town Attorney.
4. Adopt Capital Project Ordinance Amendment #14 for the remaining $2,087,910 in grant funds, inclusive of the
10

Page 21 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

construction contract and contingency. No local funding is being requested for this project.
'Hunter Freeman, P.E. with McAdams, the town's engineering consultant, will present the project, bid results, value
engineering recommendations, and proposed construction contract award.
'Included in the item attachments are the bid tabulation, value engineering memorandum with tabulation, Notice of
Award, and Capital Project Ordinance.
'By motion, issue the Notice of Award for the Bonnett Street Stormwater Pump Station Project to Fred Smith
Company in the amount of $1,955,016.00, including Bid Alternate No. 1 (Duplex Pump Station) and Bid Alternate
No. 2 (Modified Parking Lot Pavement Improvements); establish a construction contingency of $132,894; authorize
the Town Manager to execute the construction contract and all associated project documents following receipt of
required funding agency approvals and review by Town Attorney; adopt Capital Project Ordinance Amendment #14
for an additional $2,087,910 in grant funding and project construction/contingency."
Hunter Freeman, P.E. with McAdams, the town's engineering consultant, presented a project overview. The system
will collect stormwater from the south end of Wrightsville Avenue via a collection pipe, designed to minimize tree
removal along residential properties, and convey it to a pump station located in a currently vegetated corner of
Dowdy Park. From there, water will be pumped up Bonnett Street to the beach access parking lot, where an
infiltration chamber system beneath the pavement will allow the water to percolate into the sand. Permits,
including a CAMA minor permit, land disturbance permit, and NCDOT encroachment agreement, are in hand.
Mr. Freeman noted that the primary benefit of the project is for routine summer thunderstorm events, which can
leave standing water on Wrightsville Avenue for multiple days. The system will also provide the town additional
operational flexibility for larger storm events. He confirmed that the design was adjusted during value engineering
to bring the bid within the fixed grant budget, with approximately a 7% contingency retained. The parking lot will
be redone to include traditional asphalt drive aisles alongside portions of permeable pavement to ensure infiltration.
The lowest qualified bid was submitted by Fred Smith Company.
Engineer Ryan confirmed to the mayor that construction is scheduled to begin in early October 2026, with
completion anticipated by the end of May 2027. The contractor will use Bonnett Street beach access as a staging
area beginning mid-December to avoid interference with school traffic during the academic term. Lane closures
along Wrightsville Avenue will be limited to the winter break period.
MOTION: Comr. Harrison moved to issue the Notice of Award for the Bonnett Street Stormwater Pump Station
Project to Fred Smith Company in the amount of $1,955,016.00, including Bid Alternate No. 1 (Duplex Pump
Station) and Bid Alternate No. 2 (Modified Parking Lot Pavement Improvements) and authorize the town manager
to execute the construction contract and all associated project documents following receipt of required funding
agency approvals and review by town attorney. Mayor Pro Tem Lambert seconded the motion, which passed
unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Lambert moved to adopt Capital Project Ordinance Amendment #14 for an additional
$2,087,910 in grant funding and project construction/contingency. Comr. Harrison seconded the motion, which
passed unanimously.
MOTION: Comr. Vaughan moved to establish a construction contingency of $132,894. Comr. Sanders seconded
the motion, which passed unanimously.
The contract and notice of award are on file in the town clerk's office. The ordinance, as adopted, is attached to
and made part of these minutes as Addendum "F".
RECESS/RECONVENE – The Board took a brief recess at 10:32 a.m. and reconvened at 10:44 a.m.
OLD BUSINESS/ITEMS TABLED FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS
From July 1, 2026 - Discussion of Town Code Chapter 4: Crowd Gathering Activities
Manager Garman introduced this item. The summary sheet read in part as follows:
"At its July 1, 2026 meeting, the board adopted changes to the Crowd Gathering Activities and Group
Demonstrations ordinance. They also directed staff to continue collaborating with the Outer Banks Visitors
Bureau staff on changes to the Crowd Gathering ordinance to clarify and establish procedures for applicants to
amend permits after they are issued. The goal of this amendment would be to encourage applicants to apply for
permits well ahead of the deadline. Currently, applicants may be hesitant to do this out of concern that changes
after permit issuance are not possible. This was in lieu of creating a separate conditional approval process, which
the board was not comfortable with.
'The attached ordinance adds a new section, 4-8, related to permit amendments. Additionally, new language has
been added to clarify staff's ability to add conditions to crowd gathering permits.
'Staff recommends adoption of the proposed amendments."
11

Page 22 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

Mayor Cahoon reviewed the proposed modifications, noting that event organizers may submit permit applications
up to one year in advance and may make changes until 15 days before the event, which should help address
concerns about advertising and preparation time. Manager Garman clarified that most changes are related to the
site plan, parking, and other details, but that changes affecting the event tier would be subject to the original tier
application deadlines. The board expressed support for the modifications, noting that they provide flexibility for
event organizers while allowing staff to address minor conditions and strike a reasonable balance between the
town’s needs and those of the Visitors Bureau and event organizers.
MOTION: Comr. Sanders moved to adopt updates to Town Code Chapter 4: Crowd Gathering Activities as
presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Vaughan, which passed unanimously.
The ordinance, as adopted, is attached to and made part of these minutes as shown in Addendum "E".
NEW BUSINESS CONT.
Committee Reports
Comr. Harrison – reported that Current TV is searching for a new Executive Director and that the organization
continues to produce creative content, including a recently completed piece titled The Life of a Beach Access and
another on the historic Nags Head Cottage Row architecture.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert – noted that Planning Director Wyatt's report and the earlier septic health proclamation
covered her committee's updates and expressed enthusiasm about the progress of the town's low-interest loan
program for septic repairs.
Comr. Sanders – reported continued progress at the Dare County Housing Foundation, expressing optimism about
the direction of its work.
Comr. Vaughan – reported on the Dare County Tourism Bureau’s August meeting, noting that Dare County ranked
fourth in the state for tourism spending in 2025 at just over $2 billion, with overall figures essentially flat from the
prior year. She reported that June occupancy tax increased 3% and meals tax was slightly higher, while noting that
these figures do not necessarily reflect profitability or visitor volume. Nags Head accounted for 26% of Dare
County’s June occupancy tax revenue and 25% of meals tax revenue. She also noted that 31 applications are under
review in the current event grant cycle and that the Tourism Impact Grant period is active.
Mayor Cahoon – provided an update on Jennette's Pier, reporting that visitation was affected by pier closures in
March and April due to plank replacement and HVAC work, but that May and June were strong and the project is
complete. A new mini-split system has been installed in the IT room and elevator control area, and the pier has
contracted for the installation of new wind turbines with delivery anticipated within 180 days. Solar installation
approval has also been obtained. Comr. Vaughan inquired about a trapdoor feature at the pier. Mayor Cahoon
explained that the pier has a trapdoor in the research shed at the end, which allows divers to be lowered into the
water to conduct research or inspections without the need for a boat, keeping the pier operational for fishing
activities.
Consideration of Items Required for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Low-Interest Loan/Grant Application
- Resolution in Support of the NC Division of Water Infrastructure DWSRF Funding Application
- Resolution Adopting the Ten-Year Water Capital Improvement Program
- Ten-Year Water Capital Improvement Program
Deputy Town Manager/Finance Officer Amy Miller introduced this item. The summary sheet read in part as follows:
"The Town is seeking a low-interest and/or principal forgiveness loan to replace the asbestos cement pipes in the
Vista Colony and Villa Dunes neighborhoods in accordance with the Town's adopted Capital Improvement Program
(CIP). The resolutions are required by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of
Water Infrastructure, to authorize the Town Manager or Deputy Town Manager to submit a grant application on
behalf of the Town. The ten-year Water CIP, also required by DEQ for the grant application, includes the adopted
FY 2027–2031 Water CIP and projected projects for FY 2032–2036 and beyond, including projects coordinated with
street, stormwater, and sidewalk improvements. The adoption of this CIP does not restrict the town's ability to
refine the CIP each fiscal year to prioritize infrastructure projects and address emerging needs.
'Staff recommends approving the proposed CIP allowing the town to apply for SRF funding to replace A/C
waterlines.
'Adoption of the resolutions authorizing the Town Manager or Deputy Town Manager to file a grant application on
behalf of the Town and adopting the ten-year Water CIP for fiscal years 2027-2036 and beyond as presented."
In addition to what was in the summary sheet, Deputy Town Manager/Finance Officer Miller shared that although
the loan program offers principal forgiveness, the town’s financial indicators do not qualify it for that option based
on factors including poverty level, valuation, and per capita income. She noted that the low-interest loan remains
favorable, with an estimated interest rate of approximately 2% to 2.5% and a potential 20- to 30-year term. The
loan would require Local Government Commission approval and includes a 2% closing fee, which cannot be
financed. Based on the approximately $3 million anticipated borrowing amount, the closing fee would be
12

Page 23 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

approximately $60,000 that would need to be budgeted separately.
Deputy Town Manager/Finance Officer Miller stated that the proposed loan is awarded through a competitive
scoring system and based on a preliminary review, the town believes it can achieve sufficient points to qualify. Staff
expect to learn whether the town is awarded the loan in February. The loan would cover eligible project costs,
including surveying, engineering, construction administration, and construction.
In response to Mayor Cahoon's question, Ms. Miller confirmed that the ten-year water capital improvement program
spreadsheet was part of the public package. The mayor noted that he had asked for clarification about the
possibility of forgiveness.
Comr. Harrison noted that water line replacement funding was one of the town’s legislative priorities this year, but
that the request was not funded. Mayor Cahoon stated that the town will continue to seek legislative funding and,
if the town is approved for the loan, it would not be required to accept the loan if legislative funding becomes
available.
MOTION: Comr. Vaughan moved to adopt the resolution authorizing the Town Manager or Deputy Town Manager
to file a grant application on behalf of the Town as presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Sanders, which
passed unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Lambert moved to adopt the resolution adopting the ten-year Water CIP for fiscal years
2027-2036 and beyond as presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Harrison, which passed unanimously.
The resolution in support of the NC Division of Water Infrastructure DWSRF Funding application, as adopted, read
in part as follows:
"WHEREAS: The Town of Nags Head (the “Town”) has need for and intends to construct a project described as
Asbestos Cement Pipe Replacement (the “project”), and
'WHEREAS: The Town intends to request State loan/and/or grant assistance for the project, and
'NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWN OF NAGS HEAD:
'That the Town of Nags Head the Applicant, will arrange financing for all remaining costs of the projects, if
approved for a State loan and/or grant award.
'That the Applicant will provide for efficient operation and maintenance of the projects on completion of
construction thereof.
'That the Applicant will adopt and place into effect on or before completion of the projects a schedule of fees and
charges and other available funds which will provide adequate funds for proper operation, maintenance, and
administration of the system and the repayment of all principal and interest on the debt.
'That the governing body of the Applicant agrees to include in the loan agreement a provision authorizing the State
Treasurer, upon failure of the Town of Nags Head to make a scheduled repayment of the loan, to withhold from
the Town of Nags Head any State funds that would otherwise be distributed to the Town of Nags Head in an
amount sufficient to pay all sums then due and payable to the State as a repayment of the loan.
'That Andy Garman, Town Manager, and Amy Miller, Deputy Town Manager/Finance Officer, the Authorized
Representatives and successors so titled, are hereby authorized to execute and file applications on behalf of the
Applicant with the State of North Carolina for a loan and/or grant to aid in the study of or construction of the
project described above.
'That the Authorized Representatives, and successors so titled, are hereby authorized and directed to furnish such
information as the appropriate State agency may request in connection with such applications or the projects: to
make the assurances as contained above; and to execute such other documents as may be required in connection
with the application.
'That the Applicant has substantially complied or will substantially comply with all Federal, State, and local laws,
rules, regulations, ordinances, and funding conditions applicable to the projects and to Federal and State grants
and loans pertaining thereto."
The resolution adopting the Ten-Year Water Capital Improvement Program, as adopted, read in part as follows:
"WHEREAS: The Town of Nags Head (the “Town”) continues to adhere to a high standard of professional financial
management to ensure adequate infrastructure and services for its customers; and
'WHEREAS: The Town has the need for an adopted ten-year Capital Improvement Budget Program (CIP) for water
projects; and
'WHEREAS: The Town recognizes the Capital Improvement Program to be an important management tool that
coordinates infrastructure needs with the Town of Nags Head’s financial capacity; and
13

Page 24 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

'WHEREAS: The Town has prepared a ten-year Capital Improvement Program which balances projected revenues
and expenditures based on a financial forecast and assumptions with regard to the Town of Nags Head’s long-range
financial capacity and includes cost estimates for projects scheduled for at least the first five years; and
'WHEREAS: The Town will update the ten-year Capital Improvement Budget Program regularly as part of the Town
of Nags Head’s budget process; and
'NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWN OF NAGS HEAD, that the
ten-year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2027-2036 is hereby adopted as the Town of Nags Head’s
long-range Capital Improvement Program."
The ten-year water Capital Improvement Program is on file in the town clerk's office.
ITEMS REFERRED TO AND PRESENTATIONS FROM TOWN ATTORNEY
Attorney Leidy noted that he had nothing to present today.
ITEMS REFERRED TO AND PRESENTATIONS FROM TOWN MANAGER
Discussion of Multi-Year Beach Access Replacements
Deputy Town Manager/Finance Officer Amy Miller summarized her report, which read in part as follows:
"Nags Head Public Services staff continually assesses the condition of the town's public beach accesses. Based on
its condition, Public Services is requesting that the Barnes Street beach access be re-prioritized to be replaced this
year. The CIP has Albatross being replaced this year and Barnes Street in FY 2027/28. Public Services is
recommending switching these projects, since Albatross is in better condition. Local funding budgeted for beach
access repairs this fiscal year totals $116,675, which the town engineer estimates to be the cost of replacing the
Barnes Street walkover.
'The town has been striving to replace two beach access walkovers a year. The Glidden Street beach access was
the second walkover the town was replacing in this fiscal year. This project was grant contingent, and we did not
receive a CAMA grant. To keep this project on track, we would now recommend applying for a grant from the
Outer Banks Visitors Bureau in September for 75% of the cost. We are usually notified in November of the grant
award. If the town receives the OBVB grant, approximately $46,600 in additional beach nourishment capital
reserve funds would be needed to construct the project, since Barnes Street would use all the funds we budgeted
for beach access replacements. We would come to the board in December and request the funds if we receive a
favorable decision. Alternatively, the town could carry the grant award into FY 27/28 to complete Glidden Street, if
the board decides not to fund the project outside of the budget process. If grant funds are not received, the Board
will need to decide if they want to complete the project with only town funds this fiscal year or in a subsequent
fiscal year.
'The intent of the CIP is to follow the Board's prioritized order of programmatically replacing beach access
walkovers. However, as conditions deteriorate at individual locations, staff appreciates the Board’s consideration to
reprioritize replacements and provide flexibility as needs arise.
'1. Replace the Barnes Street beach access walkover in FY 26/27, moving it up from FY 27/28. The cost is
$115,000. This would use all the local funds the Board appropriated this fiscal year for beach access walkover
replacements.
2. Replace the Albatross Street beach access walkover in FY 27/28, moving it back from FY 26/27.
3. Apply for an Outer Banks Visitors Bureau grant for the Glidden Street beach access walkover. The town did not
receive a CAMA grant for this project. Staff will update the Board on whether that grant is received, and will
request additional funding or move the project back to a different fiscal year.
'Approve staff recommendations of re-prioritizing the beach access walkovers for Barnes, Albatross, and Glidden
Streets."
Comr. Vaughan asked about the cost difference that would result from reprioritizing the projects. Ms. Miller
explained that approximately $116,000 is currently budgeted for the local share of the Glidden Street grant match
and the amount previously budgeted for Albatross Street. She noted that the estimated cost of the reprioritized
work is approximately $115,000, allowing the project to be funded with the existing budgeted amount.
Mayor Cahoon confirmed with Town Engineer Ryan that the $115,000 estimate includes contingency funds.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert expressed appreciation for the grant suggestions.
MOTION: Comr. Vaughan moved to amend the town's Capital Improvement Plan to accelerate the Barnes St.
replacement and to defer the Albatross St. replacement. The motion was seconded by Comr. Harrison, which
passed unanimously.
It was confirmed that no formal approval is required for the Outer Banks Visitor's Bureau grant application.
14

Page 25 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

Discussion of E-Bikes
Police Chief Hale presented this item. The summary sheet read in part as follows:
"At the September 2, 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting, Police Chief Hale will give an overview of Nags Head’s
current e-bike ordinance, discuss potential changes, and review recent changes to North Carolina legislation
included in Session Law 2026-46 (HB1094).
'Staff would recommend that the board initiate a policy discussion on the management of e-bikes, to include a
report and recommendation prepared by staff to be brought back at a future meeting, particularly with respect to
their use on the beach road multi-use path and sidewalks."
Police Chief Hale presented a detailed overview addressing the town's ongoing concerns with the use of e-bikes on
the multi-use path along NC 12. He noted that since the town amended its ordinance in fall 2023, allowing e-bikes
on the path under safe operation standards, the situation has somewhat improved; however, challenges and risks
remain. Chief Hale highlighted the increasing public safety risk arising from the intersection of faster-moving ebikes with high pedestrian volumes, including runners, families, strollers, and vehicles using driveways along the
path. He stated that there have been a number of reported collisions along with numerous near-misses, underlining
the potential for accidents and injuries.
Chief Hale reviewed the North Carolina General Assembly's recent legislative actions regarding e-bike
classifications. The new legislation establishes three classes of e-bikes: Class 1, which are pedal-assisted with a
maximum speed of 20 mph; Class 2, which are motor-assisted without pedaling also up to 20 mph; and Class 3,
which are pedal-assisted and can reach speeds of up to 28 mph. He expressed concern that some users are
modifying their bikes to exceed these speed limitations, with speeds in other jurisdictions recorded at 40-45 mph,
thus posing considerable enforcement challenges. Radar equipment is not effective at accurately measuring the
speed of bicycles in traffic, and deploying a lidar unit effectively would require an officer to be stationed specifically
for that task.
Considering the information presented and to help mitigate the possibility of collisions, Chief Hale recommended
prohibiting all e-bikes on the multi-use path along NC 12. He suggested that the higher pedestrian volumes on this
path warranted restrictions, while the Hwy 158 bypass path and SR 1243 corridor in South Nags Head could remain
unaffected due to lower pedestrian traffic.
Comr. Harrison thanked the public for their comments and introduced the idea of a seasonal restriction but
recognized it might unfairly impact responsible users during peak biking seasons. Chief Hale acknowledged the
fairness concerns expressed by responsible users of e-bikes and showed openness to a potential seasonal ban,
comparable to beach driving season, as an alternative approach, suggesting restrictions only between Memorial
Day and Labor Day. He also noted that enforcement involving juveniles under age 16 would be limited, with certain
violations, such as failure to wear a helmet, potentially resulting in parental responsibility under State law. He also
noted that he sees many families and older adults riding e-bikes responsibly and that the goal should be to address
unsafe behavior without unnecessarily restricting responsible riders.
Comr. Harrison asked about the safety of putting children using e-bikes in the street. Chief Hale acknowledged that
the safety of children riding e-bikes along the roadway was a concern that had been considered when the town
previously reviewed e-bike regulations in 2023. He explained that bicycles are considered vehicles and are
permitted on roadways but noted that the safety implications would need to be weighed if e-bikes were prohibited
from the multi-use path. He said that, based on what he has observed, families with children using e-bikes are
more commonly seen riding in neighborhoods with their parents, rather than on the multi-use path. He noted that
children riding with their parents on e-bikes generally do not appear to be traveling at excessive speeds but said
the board could consider whether an age restriction or an exception for children riding with family members would
be appropriate.
Chief Hale distinguished these riders from juveniles who have presented greater safety concerns in other
jurisdictions, noting that some juveniles ride through neighborhoods at high speeds and may not wear helmets. He
also described seeing e-bikes that resemble dirt bikes and lack operable pedals. He explained that the statutory
requirement for operable pedals has not changed and that some individuals have attempted to circumvent the
requirement by attaching aftermarket pedals that are not actually functional. Chief Hale cautioned that, regardless
of the regulations adopted, enforcement would not capture every violation.
Comr. Harrison asked whether it would be realistic for the police department to monitor e-bike speeds on the multiuse path. Chief Hale responded that continuous speed enforcement would not be practical due to staffing and time
constraints, as an officer would need to remain on the path with LIDAR equipment and e-bike activity varies from
day to day. He noted that officers can enforce the existing requirement that e-bikes be operated at an appropriate,
non-reckless speed and distinguished responsible operation, such as alerting pedestrians when passing, from
unsafe behavior such as weaving around pedestrians or abruptly moving between the path and roadway to pass
others, which he believed could create additional hazards.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert clarified that e-bikes without operable pedals already fall outside legal use under current
law. Chief Hale confirmed that they are not legal e-bikes and that the current discussion regarding e-bike
regulations would not affect them. He explained that e-bikes in North Carolina have been required to have operable
15

Page 26 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

pedals and that vehicles without operable pedals would instead be classified under another category, such as a
moped or electric motorcycle. Mayor Pro Tem Lambert then confirmed that this discussion was focused on NC 12
rather than SR1243, Old Oregon Inlet Rd, in South Nags Head.
Comr. Sanders queried about available accident statistics related to e-bike incidents compared to regular bicycles.
Chief Hale said he did not have specific statistics available but noted that the town had experienced some e-bikerelated accidents and near misses. He referenced a recent crash on Beach Road, NC 12, involving an illegal e-bike
without operable pedals that was capable of higher speeds, in which the rider was injured. He also noted that more
common than actual collisions were near-miss incidents in which pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorists swerved or
braked suddenly to avoid contact, sometimes resulting in a rider losing control or falling.
Comr. Vaughan asked Chief Hale to address the relative safety of riding an e-bike on the roadway versus the multiuse path. Chief Hale explained that because bikes, including e-bikes, are considered vehicles under North Carolina
law, riders on the roadway must follow the same rules of the road as other vehicles, including stopping when traffic
is stopped to allow another vehicle to turn, stopping at stop signs, and not passing stopped traffic in a manner that
violates traffic laws. He also noted that bicyclists and e-bike riders must dismount and walk their bikes when
crossing roadways at crosswalks, rather than riding through the crosswalk, and cautioned that failure to follow
these requirements could result in the rider being found at fault or considered a contributing factor in a collision.
Comr. Sanders asked Manager Garman about the frequency of the speed limit markings on the multi-use path,
noting that he did not see them as often as he had when they were first installed. Manager Garman explained that
the pavement markings were originally placed approximately every mile but had not been replaced in some areas
where the path had since been overlaid, including the section from Jennette’s Pier to Curlew. He noted that there
had also been discussion about the appearance of the pavement markings and that, if additional speed limit
reminders are desired, the town would prefer using signs rather than pavement markings.
Mayor Cahoon confirmed the current standard that if an e-bike without pedals is being used on the multi-use path,
police will stop the rider if they observe it to which Chief Hale agreed. He then explained that, when juveniles are
found operating electric bikes without operable pedals, officers attempt to identify where they live and speak with
their parents to educate them that the vehicles do not meet the State’s definition of an e-bike. He noted that
continued operation could result in enforcement against a parent for allowing an uninsured vehicle to be used, as
vehicles classified as mopeds are required to be registered and insured. Chief Hale also expressed his opinion that
e-bikes should have some form of insurance or registration requirement to address potential liability in the event of
a collision. He then clarified that legal e-bikes with operable pedals remain subject to enforcement when operated
on a multi-use path at an unsafe speed or in an unsafe manner in violation of the town’s ordinance.
The discussion noted that speed and rider behavior are not the only considerations when evaluating safety on the
multi-use path, as the weight and mass of an e-bike also factor into the potential impact of a collision. It was noted
that a traditional bicycle can also be operated at unsafe speeds, with some experienced cyclists traveling 25 to 30
mph, and that those riders generally use the roadway rather than the multi-use path because of their higher
speeds.
Mayor Cahoon noted that visibility at driveways that cross the multi-use path is another safety concern, as
motorists exiting driveways may primarily look toward the lane into which they are turning and may not see
pedestrians or bicyclists traveling in the opposite direction. He emphasized that this presents a potential hazard
regardless of whether a person is walking, running, or riding an e-bike.
Chief Hale pointed out that the new state legislation regarding e-bikes would only come into effect in December
2026. Until then, any signage or enforcement actions would focus on educating the public.
Mayor Cahoon noted that seasonality should be considered in evaluating potential e-bike regulations. He stated
that, with the current season nearing its end, the board has time to consider the issue before next season, including
whether signs or other measures may be appropriate. He said he would prefer to give further consideration to the
discussion before making a decision.
Comr. Harrison stated that she needed additional time to consider the issue, expressed interest in hearing from
more members of the public, and said she would like time to evaluate how potential e-bike regulations could work.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert agreed that additional public feedback would be helpful, noting that several new ideas had
been discussed that day and that input from Nags Head residents and town staff could help evaluate the options.
She echoed Comr. Harrison’s comments, emphasizing the importance of balancing the interests of residents who
use e-bikes responsibly with the need to address public safety concerns.
Comr. Sanders agreed that the issue involves balancing public safety with the interests of people who ride e-bikes
responsibly on the multi-use path. He noted the existing 10-mph speed limit and said he was surprised there had
been concerns about it, suggesting that effective enforcement of the speed limit could help address some of the
safety concerns. He agreed that the board could continue to discuss and evaluate the issue before making any
decisions.
16

Page 27 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

Comr. Vaughan agreed with waiting to make a decision and said the issue was difficult but noted that the multi-use
path along NC 12 is used predominantly by walkers, runners, families with strollers, and people stopping to talk,
creating a need to consider the volume and type of users when evaluating safety. She also noted concerns about
vehicles entering the roadway from driveways and the weight, size, quiet operation, and speed of some e-bikes.
She said she had observed larger, heavier e-bikes being operated quickly in her neighborhood and expressed
concern that wearing a helmet alone does not necessarily make that type of operation safe for pedestrians. She
concluded that she was comfortable continuing to consider the issue.
Comr. Harrison asked whether other municipalities had adopted regulations regarding e-bikes since the State law
was enacted. Chief Hale said he was not aware of any municipalities that had adopted new regulations, noting that
most had been waiting to see how the legislation would be implemented. He said the issue has been discussed
among local police chiefs and that schools and parks and recreation facilities have implemented restrictions
requiring riders to dismount and walk e-bikes on the property. Chief Hale said agencies are continuing to monitor
the legislation and what other jurisdictions, including Dare County, decide to do.
Mayor Cahoon thanked Chief Hale for his input and willingness to answer questions, noting that the board would
likely have additional questions as it continued to consider the issue.
Discussion of Automated License Plate Readers
Police Chief Hale introduced this item. The summary sheet read in part as follows:
"At the September 2, 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting, Police Chief Hale will give an overview of Nags Head's
automated license plate reader system, including the policy and controls we have in place to oversee and
appropriately manage its use.
'The Police Department shares information about our system through its website
https://www.nagsheadnc.gov/225/Police. Here you can find our transparency portal, an FAQ page, and our policy
on use of the system.
'Dare County and the municipalities in Dare County received a petition requesting information on the use of ALPR
systems and discontinuation of their use. The town has used these systems for several years and the information
has led to the resolution of a number of criminal cases. We have a policy which governs how the data can be
accessed and shared. We also maintain a transparency portal to help the public understand how the system is
used. Our staff are highly trained and professional. We believe we have the appropriate oversight and internal
controls in place to manage use of the system."
Town Manager Garman introduced the item, explaining that the board had received a petition and public requests
to remove the town's Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras, and that the discussion was scheduled to
allow staff to present information on how the system operates and for the board to consider its response.
Chief Hale opened with a summary of the legal landscape, distinguishing the ALPR system from cell phone location
tracking cases such as Carpenter v. United States (2018) and the 2026 Fourth Circuit case Chatrie v. United States.
He cited a 2024 Fifth Circuit case, United States v. Porter, affirmed in March 2026, that specifically addressed LPR
systems, holding that such cameras do not invade a reasonable expectation of privacy because individuals traveling
on public thoroughfares have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their movements and because LPR systems
lack the comprehensive tracking capability of cell site location information (CSLI).
Chief Hale noted that the town contracted with Flock for ALPR cameras in 2023 following discussion during the CIP
and budget process, and the cameras were installed in February 2024. He stated that the police department has
had an overall positive experience using Flock as an additional investigative tool, noting that the system has helped
officers quickly identify leads in criminal investigations and assist residents, businesses, and visitors who have been
victims of crime. He reported that, during the past year, Flock was used to assist with investigations in 163 cases.
Chief Hale provided an overview of the town’s ALPR deployment and its relationship to the Dare County system. He
noted that Dare County has had ALPR cameras in place since approximately 2014 and that Nags Head officers
previously accessed the County’s system through an investigator to assist with cases before Nags Head deployed its
own Flock cameras in 2024. He explained that the town currently has 12 cameras located along major roads and at
the entrances to Nags Head, including US 64, South Virginia Dare Trail, US 158, and SR 1243.
Chief Hale explained that the cameras capture images of vehicles and license plates as they pass, but do not
identify the vehicle owner or driver. Officers must conduct a separate query through a law enforcement database
to obtain information associated with a license plate. He also clarified that the cameras do not provide a live video
feed and that officers do not routinely monitor or run queries on the system; rather, the system is accessed as part
of an investigation after a crime has occurred. He noted that the cameras provide limited information about a
vehicle’s movements within Nags Head, as officers would not know where a vehicle traveled after passing a camera
unless it subsequently passed another camera. Chief Hale then introduced Detective Mike Alvarez, to provide
additional information on the system and its use in investigations.
Detective Alvarez presented a detailed technical overview of the Flock Safety Falcon ALPR system. He explained
that the cameras are fixed devices with no pan, tilt, or zoom capability, and capture only still images—
17

Page 28 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

approximately three per vehicle pass—of the rear of vehicles as they trigger motion sensors. There is no live or
continuous feed. Images are transmitted via cellular connection to Flock servers, where the alphanumeric
characters of the license plate are cross-referenced with the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) to generate
real-time alerts to patrol officers about stolen vehicles, wanted suspects, and missing persons, including Amber
Alerts.
Mayor Cahoon asked Detective Alvarez to clarify whether the system identifies the person associated with a vehicle,
noting that an alert indicates that a vehicle with a specific license plate is being sought but does not establish
whether the suspect or missing person is actually in the vehicle.
Detective Alvarez clarified that the ALPR system inherently lacks the capacity to identify drivers or link the images
of license plates directly to vehicle owners. He explained that to obtain information about who owns a vehicle,
officers must perform a separate query using a law enforcement database, like Omnixx, which connects to the
North Carolina Division of Criminal Information and the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
Further elaborating on the system's capabilities, Alvarez introduced the retrospective investigation function: after a
crime has occurred, law enforcement can query stored data within the system using vehicle descriptions such as
make, model, color, and fragments of license plate numbers to filter potential suspect vehicles. However, before
conducting any search, officers must provide specific information: selecting an offense type from a predefined list
of 44 options, including serious crimes, as well as entering a case number and a specified reason for the inquiry. It
is crucial to note that the data obtained is not utilized for routine traffic stops, immigration checks, reproductive
health investigations, or ongoing surveillance, ensuring its use is confined to significant matters of public safety.
Mayor Cahoon sought to understand the additional steps involved in this supplementary search, to which Detective
Alvarez responded that this process involves accessing another system entirely. Officers or detectives would have
to log in to an external database to cross-reference the license plate numbers, thereby determining the vehicle's
registered owner.
Mayor Cahoon noted that there are reasons for restrictions on accessing information identifying the owner
associated with a license plate. He stated that, if Flock had the ability to match license plates to vehicle owners
while complying with those restrictions, he presumed the company would have offered that capability to the town.
Detective Alvarez explained that access to information identifying vehicle owners is restricted by the FBI and State
Bureau of Investigation because those databases are owned and maintained by those agencies. He stated that,
even if Flock wanted to provide that information directly, the company would likely be prohibited from having that
capability.
Comr. Harrison asked for clarification on the distinction between a search and a “hit,” asking whether a "hit" means
an officer would receive an alert to be on the lookout for a particular vehicle, to which Detective Alvarez confirmed.
She then asked whether alerts could originate from outside North Carolina. Detective Alvarez explained that they
could, depending on the agency, if an out-of-state agency entered the vehicle into the hot list. Comr. Harrison
asked how frequently the town receives out-of-state ALPR alerts. Detective Alvarez said they are not very frequent
but do occur from time to time, with real-time alerts generally received by patrol officers and routed through
dispatch.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert asked if we share our data outside of NC, to which Detective Alvarez replied that he
believes that we do not but wanted Chief Hale to confirm.
Mayor Cahoon asked whether the town receives an alert when another North Carolina law enforcement agency
requests to view an image of a license plate captured by a Nags Head ALPR camera.
Detective Alvarez explained that the Town does not receive a real-time alert when another agency accesses a
license plate image, but such activity is recorded through the system’s auditing function. He noted that Chief Hale
would provide additional information about the auditing process later in the presentation.
Chief Hale explained that Nags Head does not share its ALPR network with law enforcement agencies outside North
Carolina. He said the decision was made following what was believed to be a breach of the system approximately a
year earlier, although Flock subsequently hired an independent company to test its system for vulnerabilities and
found no evidence of a breach. He noted that information from another state had been disclosed through a public
records request, raising concerns because North Carolina law classifies license plate data as not a public record.
Flock subsequently recommended that North Carolina agencies restrict access to their networks, and the town
disabled access to its system from agencies outside the state. He clarified that Nags Head may still have the ability
to search ALPR networks in other states, but those agencies cannot search the town’s network.
Comr. Harrison asked whether a law enforcement agency in another North Carolina county, such as Mecklenburg
County, could search Nags Head’s ALPR data without approval from the town. Chief Hale confirmed that they could
because the town shares its ALPR network with law enforcement agencies within North Carolina.
Chief Hale described the town's auditing and oversight framework. Monthly audits are conducted by a lieutenant
covering organizational searches (verifying case numbers and reasons), event logs (tracking user changes), and
18

Page 29 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

network audits (identifying which North Carolina agencies accessed the town's data). A recently added "Audit
Assist" feature automatically flags anomalies, such as repeated searches of a single plate within a short time,
requiring the lieutenant to review and verify each flagged search. An annual review memo summarizes system
users, restrictions, and policy compliance.
Chief Hale outlined the applicable North Carolina legal framework: G.S. 20-183.31 mandates a written policy
governing LPR use for official law enforcement purposes only; G.S. 20-183.32 sets a 90-day data retention limit
under state law, though Flock Safety's uniform policy deletes data after 30 days, and that captured plate data is not
a public record and may not be sold. Penalties for violations are included in G.S. 20-183.33. Violating these
provisions constitutes a Class 1 misdemeanor, which carries the consequence of a probable cause hearing before
the NC Training and Standards Commission and potential revocation of law enforcement certification.
Chief Hale noted that North Carolina has legislation governing the use of ALPR systems and stated that it has been
proactive compared with other states where misuse of the technology has been reported. He explained that Nags
Head’s policies and procedures are consistent with NC law and that any officer found to have misused or abused
the system would be subject to disciplinary action, including a recommendation for termination, as well as potential
criminal charges under NC law.
Chief Hale explained that Flock’s 30-day data retention period is shorter than the 90-day period permitted under
North Carolina law. He stated that, if the department needed to preserve ALPR data beyond Flock’s 30-day
retention period for a major investigation, it would need to obtain the appropriate legal authorization, such as a
preservation letter and search warrant signed by a Superior Court judge or a federal search warrant for cases being
pursued federally. He emphasized that the request must be submitted to Flock before the 30-day period expires
because the data is otherwise deleted from the system.
Chief Hale reviewed the town’s ALPR transparency portal and addressed several common misconceptions about
the system. He stated that the cameras do not use facial recognition or collect demographic information and only
capture images of the rear and side of vehicles and their license plates. He explained that the town owns the data
under its contract with Flock and controls with whom it is shared, noting that the town does not share its data with
agencies outside North Carolina. He also stated that North Carolina law prohibits the sale of the data.
Chief Hale addressed concerns regarding the security of the system, noting that Flock uses AWS, encrypts data in
transit and at rest, requires multifactor authentication, and conducts regular penetration testing. He reiterated that
an independent company recently tested the system for vulnerabilities and found no successful breach, with a
report expected to be released later.
Regarding concerns that the system creates a permanent record of individuals’ movements, Chief Hale explained
that the data is retained for 30 days and does not identify the person operating a vehicle. He stated that the
system shows that a particular vehicle was at a specific location at a specific time but does not indicate who was
driving the vehicle.
Chief Hale explained that Flock does not identify vehicle drivers or occupants, provide vehicle owners’ names or
addresses, or measure vehicle speeds. He reiterated that the town’s contract prohibits Flock from selling or
providing the data to others. He also outlined restrictions adopted by the Nags Head Police Department, including
not using the system for immigration enforcement, routine traffic enforcement, or reproductive health enforcement,
and not sharing access to the town’s network with out-of-state or federal agencies.
Chief Hale clarified that the Department may use ALPR information in connection with traffic offenses such as hitand-run incidents, which are criminal offenses under North Carolina law, but does not use the system for routine
traffic enforcement or vehicle registration purposes. He emphasized that the system does not provide information
about a vehicle’s registration, insurance, mechanical condition, or other characteristics; it simply captures an image
of a vehicle at a specific location and time.
Chief Hale provided examples of how the ALPR system has assisted the Police Department with criminal
investigations. He described its use in the Avalon Pier homicide investigation, where Detective Alvarez used a
partial license plate provided by a witness to narrow the possible vehicle, ultimately allowing officers to track the
vehicle as it crossed the Currituck County line and take the suspect into custody within approximately one to one
and a half hours. Chief Hale noted that the system has also provided investigative leads in robberies, assaults,
vehicle-related offenses, and other felony cases.
He provided an additional example involving a fatal bicycle crash near the Washington Baum Bridge, where the
system helped identify a vehicle involved in the incident and locate it at a residence in Manteo. Chief Hale also
reported that the system had helped solve nine vehicle break-ins and thefts from vehicles, clear more than 10
larceny and retail theft cases, including a significant Ulta theft case involving suspects traveling from Virginia, and
assist with fraud, counterfeiting, forgery, and embezzlement investigations.
Chief Hale noted that the ALPR system has also been used to disprove reported crimes. He provided two examples
in which the system helped establish that alleged vehicle damage and a reported bicycle theft occurred before the
individuals entered Nags Head, rather than within the Town. He stated that the system has therefore been useful
19

Page 30 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

not only in developing investigative leads but also in verifying and disproving reported incidents.
Chief Hale stated that the police department’s goal is to provide staff with effective investigative tools while
maintaining its mission of keeping Nags Head safe. He expressed confidence in the department’s personnel and
reiterated that any misuse or abuse of the ALPR system would result in a recommendation for termination and
potential criminal charges. He noted that the system has been in place for approximately two and a half years and
stated that, based on the safeguards and policies in place, he considers it a valuable investigative tool.
Chief Hale stated his department does not use the ALPR system for every reported offense, but rather when it
may assist with a specific investigation. He reported that, from August 20, 2025, through the date of the
presentation, the system had been used 1,366 times in connection with 162 cases. He also reported that, during
the preceding 30 days, the system recorded 224,062 unique vehicle reads, and that officers conducted 48
searches, emphasizing that the number of vehicle reads should not be interpreted as the number of investigations,
arrests, or convictions, but rather as an indication of how many vehicles passed the cameras without being
queried. He noted that those vehicle reads are deleted after 30 days unless appropriately preserved. He stated
that the system’s auditing process is intended to identify misuse and that officers who misuse the system would
be held accountable. He expressed confidence in the department’s personnel and stated that he considers the
ALPR system a valuable investigative tool for Nags Head. He encouraged the board to consider both what the
system does and what it does not do when evaluating its continued use.
Comr. Vaughan asked whether the ALPR cameras capture images of pedestrians or anyone going by in addition to
vehicles and license plates. Chief Hale confirmed that pedestrians or bicyclists could appear in an image if they are
present when the image is captured.
Comr. Sanders asked whether the ALPR system continuously tracks a vehicle after it is captured by one camera
until it is captured by another camera. Chief Hale explained that the system does not attach a tracking device to a
vehicle or continuously track its location but instead records the vehicle at specific points when it passes an ALPR
camera. Comr. Sanders compared this with the location information available through a cell phone. Chief Hale
noted that cell phones can provide more precise location information and confirmed that Flock does not sell the
data or build profiles of individuals.
Comr. Harrison questioned who oversees Flock and how the town can be assured that the company is not selling
or improperly using ALPR data. Chief Hale explained that Flock had hired an independent company to conduct an
audit and test the system for vulnerabilities. He also noted that the system must meet applicable FBI and State
Bureau of Investigation security requirements associated with law enforcement databases.
Comr. Harrison expressed concern about the ability of other North Carolina law enforcement agencies to access
Nags Head’s ALPR data and asked whether access could be restricted to agencies within Dare County. Chief Hale
said the town could restrict access to Dare County agencies or further limit access to Nags Head officers. He
explained that Nags Head has previously assisted other agencies that did not have access to ALPR systems by
conducting searches on their behalf based on the requesting agency’s case information.
Comr. Harrison asked what additional measures could be implemented to reassure the public that ALPR data is
controlled, monitored, and used only for criminal investigations. Chief Hale said access could be limited to Nags
Head officers and suggested that the town could establish a review panel involving a commissioner and one or two
citizens. He stated that the police department could provide audit information showing the date, time, and officer
associated with searches, with license plate information redacted as required.
Comr. Harrison asked whether outside agencies requesting ALPR information could be required to go through the
Nags Head Police Department rather than having direct access to the system. Chief Hale explained that, under such
an arrangement, an outside agency would contact Nags Head, provide information about its case and a case
number, and the police department would conduct the search and document the request. He noted that the
Department has previously assisted other agencies in this manner and would continue to do so if direct access
were restricted.
Comr. Harrison asked how the arrangement would work if some Dare County agencies had ALPR cameras and
others did not. Chief Hale said agencies without ALPR systems could request assistance from Nags Head by
providing their case information and asking the Department to conduct a search using the agency’s case
number.
Comr. Harrison asked about the cost of the ALPR system to the town and Mayor Pro Tem Lambert clarified that
each municipality is responsible for the cameras located within its jurisdiction and that the costs are paid from each
municipality’s budget, while Dare County separately funds its cameras. Chief Hale provided additional information
regarding the cost of the ALPR system, noting that the town recently renewed its two-year contract, which is paid
annually. He stated that the town has paid $123,616.50 since the system was implemented, including $46,756.50
during the first year for the cameras, poles, and installation and $38,430 during the second year. He noted that the
annual cost is approximately $36,000 for the town’s 12 cameras, or approximately $3,000 per camera, with taxes
included in the billed tax amounts and subsequently reimbursed to the town.
20

Page 31 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

Mayor Cahoon followed up on Comr. Harrison’s question regarding restricting access to Nags Head’s ALPR data by
outside North Carolina agencies. He asked about the potential impact on staff if outside agencies were required to
submit requests through the police department, noting that such a process could create additional staff time that is
not currently required. He also stated that, if access were restricted to Dare County agencies, it would be helpful to
know whether those agencies have policies and procedures comparable to Nags Head’s to ensure consistent
safeguards and accountability for the use of ALPR data.
Mayor Cahoon questioned the statement made during public comment that crime in Nags Head has increased by
125% in 2025, noting that he did not recall such an increase. Chief Hale said it had not, but he'd have to review the
department’s statistics.
Mayor Cahoon discussed the importance of trust, checks and balances, and departmental culture in ensuring that
officers use the ALPR system appropriately. He asked Chief Hale to explain how the police department vets officers,
establishes expectations for responsible use of law enforcement tools, maintains a culture of accountability, and
monitors officers’ use of the system.
Chief Hale described the police department as having a strong culture of accountability and emphasized the
importance of hiring officers who fit the department’s standards and values. He explained that applicants are
evaluated not only on their qualifications and experience but also on their attitude, demeanor, and ability to fit
within the department’s culture. He stated that the department has passed over highly experienced candidates
when they did not meet those standards.
Chief Hale said officers are encouraged to report concerns about one another and that complaints involving officers
are investigated through a review process involving the lieutenant, Deputy Chief, and Chief, including review of
body camera footage when appropriate. He stated that violations can result in disciplinary action and that the
department has taken disciplinary action when necessary, including referring matters to the town manager. He
emphasized that the department’s culture expects officers to do the right thing for the right reason, follow the law,
and speak up when they observe misconduct. He expressed confidence in the current staff and the department’s
accountability process.
Comr. Vaughan asked for clarification regarding the number and locations of the town’s 12 ALPR cameras in
relation to the town’s entrances. Chief Hale reviewed the camera locations and explained that the cameras cover
each direction of travel.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert asked whether the town is notified when another North Carolina law enforcement agency
accesses Nags Head’s ALPR cameras. Chief Hale explained that the town does not receive real-time alerts, but the
access is recorded in the network audit, which is reviewed every 30 days and identifies who accessed the system.
He noted that, if access were restricted to Dare County agencies, the audit would allow the department to monitor
use by those agencies and terminate access if inappropriate activity were identified.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert asked how agencies that do not have ALPR cameras, including agencies outside North
Carolina, can request access to Nags Head’s ALPR data. Chief Hale explained that agencies without direct access
must provide a case number, a brief description of the crime and information being sought, and relevant details
regarding the investigation. Nags Head officers would conduct the search and document the request under the
requesting agency’s case number, while the resulting information would remain within the town’s system. He
clarified that North Carolina law enforcement agencies currently have direct access to the town’s network, which is
recorded in the 30-day audit, while agencies outside North Carolina must request assistance through Nags Head.
Comr. Harrison asked whether ALPR data that is scheduled to be deleted after 30 days could be accessed later
through a warrant from the FBI or SBI. Chief Hale clarified that, before the 30-day retention period expires, the
department would need to submit a preservation letter and obtain the appropriate warrant to preserve the data
beyond the 30-day period.
Mayor Pro Tem Lambert asked for clarification regarding the 30-day retention period for ALPR data. Chief Hale
confirmed that Flock data is not retained beyond 30 days unless the police department submits a preservation
letter before the retention period expires and subsequently obtains the required warrant. He explained that the
preservation letter notifies Flock to preserve the data while the department obtains the warrant, which must be
issued by a superior court judge. He confirmed that, once the 30-day period has expired, the data cannot be
accessed unless the preservation process was initiated beforehand.
Comr. Harrison asked whether the town is required to share ALPR information with another agency when a request
is made during the 30-day retention period. Chief Hale explained that sharing the information is at the town’s
discretion and that requests must be associated with a case number and a legitimate investigative purpose. He
stated that the department would not provide information based solely on suspicion or general inquiry.
Board members expressed a desire to hear more from Nags Head residents, taxpayers, and property owners before
taking any action. The mayor encouraged the public to watch the full presentation and return with any remaining
questions or concerns, noting that several questions raised during the public comment period had been directly
addressed in the staff presentation.
21

Page 32 of 72

DRAFT BOC Meeting Minutes
BOC Meeting September 2, 2026

The PowerPoint presentation is attached to and made a part of these minutes as Addendum "G".
RECESS/RECONVENE – The Board took a brief recess at 12:47 p.m. and reconvened at 12:58 p.m.
Discussion of Dare County Beaches Project
Manager Garman introduced this item. The summary sheet read in part as follows:
"At the September 2, 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting, Town Manager Garman will discuss the letter
submitted on behalf of the Town of Nags Head requesting that the Dare County Beaches, NC (Bodie Island) Coastal
Storm Damage Reduction Project remain authorized for future evaluation and implementation.
'Please find attached the town’s letter to Adam R. Telle, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, U.S.
Department of the Army.
'Years ago, Dare County, Nags Head, Kill Devil Hills, and Kitty Hawk received an authorization for a federal beach
nourishment project which was never funded. Recently, this project was slated to be de-authorized by Congress.
Each community, including Nags Head, recently submitted letters requesting that the authorization remain intact.
We recommend further work to evaluate whether it is possible to obtain federal funding if the project remains
authorized."
Manager Garman mentioned that Surf City, NC recently received federal funding for a beach nourishment project
that had been authorized decades ago. He stated that, although the town had understood that additional federal
funding for beach nourishment was no longer available, the town has requested that its federal project
authorization be maintained and is exploring the possibility of obtaining federal funding. He noted that the letter
regarding the matter was included in the meeting packet for the board and the public’s information.
Mayor Cahoon pointed out that maintaining the authorization keeps the opportunity available should federal
priorities or funding policies change and that there is little cost to the federal government to maintaining the town’s
authorization.
The town’s letter to Adam R. Telle, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, U.S. Department of the Army is
on file in the town clerk's office.
MAYOR’S AGENDA
Discussion of Fall 2026 Retreat
Mayor Cahoon/Town Manager Garman discussed potential dates and content of the proposed board retreat. Staff
recommended identifying two consecutive days in November so that the full board could attend a retreat.
By consensus, the board agreed to schedule the retreat for November 5th and 6th, with the understanding that the
retreat may be shortened to one or one and a half days.
Manager Garman mentioned that a portion of the board retreat would focus on financial planning for the next
budget cycle and beyond, including potential revisions to the CIF and identifying priorities to help guide future
budget development.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mayor Cahoon noted that he will be absent from the October 7, 2026, board meeting and that Mayor Pro Tem
Lambert will preside in his absence.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Comr. Sanders moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Comr. Vaughan, which passed
unanimously. The time was 1:05 p.m.

Brittany A. Phillips, Town Clerk
Date Approved:
Mayor:
Benjamin Cahoon

22

Page 33 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM F.1.
Public Hearing for a UDO Text Amendment Submitted by George E. Goodrich to Amend Section 7.2.2., Size and
Arrangement, of the Supplemental Regulations for Cottage Courts to Establish an Alternative to the Graduated Unit
Size and Story Distribution Requirements, Allowing all Cottage Units to be Limited to One Story and a Maximum of
1,000 Square Feet of Habitable Floor Area.

Prepared by
Kelly Wyatt, Planning Director

Reviewed by
Kelly Wyatt
Brittany Phillips
John Leidy
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Staff Recommendation
Staff finds the proposed amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and recommends adoption
with revisions clarifying that any loft or mezzanine must remain less than 50 percent of the floor area below, retain
the openness required by the applicable North Carolina Residential Code, not constitute an attic story, and be
included within the 1,000-square-foot maximum habitable area. Staff also recommends requiring at least two
exterior design schemes to provide meaningful variation among cottages while maintaining a cohesive development.
All other applicable provisions of Section 7.2 would remain in effect, and the existing graduated standards would
remain unchanged for cottage courts that do not elect the alternative.
Planning Board Recommendation
The Planning Board considered this amendment at its August 18, 2026, meeting and voted unanimously to
recommend adoption of the text amendment as proposed.
Specific Action Requested
Conduct the required public hearing and consider adoption of the proposed UDO text amendment, including
statement of consistency.
Summary
George E. Goodrich has submitted a text amendment to Section 7.2.2. of the Unified Development Ordinance to
establish an optional alternative to the existing cottage court standards. Rather than following the graduated size
and story distribution requirements adopted in 2022, an applicant could develop every cottage as a one-story unit
with a limited loft or mezzanine and no more than 1,000 square feet of total habitable area. The alternative would
not increase the permitted number of units, reduce setbacks or building separation, increase lot coverage, or
change parking or emergency access requirements.
Background
In 1985, Nags Head discontinued cottage courts as an allowable use, rendering existing cottage courts
nonconforming. In 2015, the town amended its regulations to allow limited minor and major modifications to
Page 1 of 4

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 34 of 72

individual units and sites within nonconforming cottage courts.
In 2016, following discussion through the FOCUS Nags Head planning process, the town reconsidered the role of
cottage courts. The Board of Commissioners recognized the loss of hotels and other short-stay accommodations and
the desirable alternative traditionally provided by cottage courts. The November 2016 ordinance reinstated cottage
courts as a conforming use, subject to standards addressing location, size, design, density, setbacks, access,
parking, management, and continued common operation.
The 2016 standards were intended to emulate the characteristics and function of traditional cottage courts while
providing a diversity of short-stay accommodations. Individual units were initially permitted between 500 and 2,000
square feet. During preparation of the UDO, effective in 2019, the maximum was reduced to 1,500 square feet
based on concern that larger structures resembled single-family dwellings rather than cottages.
In 2022, Mr. Goodrich requested amendments to allow larger units. Staff and the Planning Board expressed concern
that units approaching 2,000 square feet and two stories would be inconsistent with traditional cottage scale. The
Board of Commissioners directed that any increase in area and height preserve diversity within the development.
The resulting graduated standards require approximately one-third of the units to remain one story, an additional
one-third to remain no more than one-and-one-half stories, and the remaining one-third to remain no more than
two stories, with corresponding maximum habitable areas of 1,500, 1,500, and 1,750 square feet.
The graduated standards allow some larger cottages without allowing an entire cottage court to be developed at
the maximum size and height. Their practical effect, however, is to prescribe a distribution of unit types even when
an applicant proposes an entire development of smaller cottages. The present request seeks to address that
limitation.

Comparison of Development Options

Standard

Existing graduated standards

Proposed small cottage alternative

Habitable
area

500 sf minimum; graduated maximums of
1,500, 1,500, and 1,750 sf.

500 sf minimum remains; 1,000 sf maximum for
every unit, including habitable loft or mezzanine
area.

Stories

Approximately one-third at each maximum of
1, 1.5, and 2 stories.

One story with a limited code-compliant loft or
mezzanine.

Applicability Existing development option remains available
and unchanged.

Optional alternative when every cottage meets the
smaller size limit.

Other
standards

All other applicable provisions of Section 7.2 remain
in effect.

All applicable provisions of Section 7.2 apply.

The proposed 1,000-square-foot maximum is consistent with the scale of Nags Head’s traditional cottage courts.
Page 2 of 4

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 35 of 72

The town’s 2016 analysis identified 36 structures within five cottage court developments, 24 of which,
approximately two-thirds, contained no more than 1,000 square feet of heated area.
Average sizes can be misleading when one substantially larger structure increases the average for an otherwise
small-scale cottage court. At Oceanside Court, seven of eight structures range from approximately 486 to 877
square feet, while one 3,082-square-foot structure raises the overall average to approximately 998 square feet.
These figures support a 1,000-square-foot maximum as generally consistent with the traditional structures the
ordinance was intended to emulate.
The amendment would not remove the graduated standards or increase any currently permitted maximum.
Applicants seeking larger cottages would continue to follow the 2022 distribution requirements. Smaller cottages
may reduce building mass, conditioned floor area, and visual intensity while providing flexibility to preserve common
areas, landscaping, pedestrian connections, and separation between structures. The application proposes one-story
cottages that may contain a loft or mezzanine but does not establish a maximum size or describe how the upperlevel area must relate to the story below. The Planning Board staff report documents consultation with the Chief
Building Inspector regarding the distinction between a limited loft or mezzanine and a conventional one-and-onehalf-story structure. A one-and-one-half-story structure commonly contains a reduced but substantially complete
upper floor within the roof, with enclosed rooms and circulation areas. A loft or mezzanine retains the open
relationship to the space below required by the applicable North Carolina Residential Code. To preserve the
intended one-story form, staff recommends allowing one loft or mezzanine only when its floor area is less than 50
percent of the floor area of the story immediately below, it retains the openness required by the applicable North
Carolina Residential Code, and it does not constitute an attic story. All habitable area within the loft or mezzanine
would count toward the 1,000-square-foot maximum. These limitations distinguish the alternative from a
conventional one-and-one-half-story cottage and prevent a substantially complete upper floor from being
characterized as a loft or mezzanine solely for zoning purposes.
Section 7.2.3 requires each cottage to receive at least 75 points under the town’s Residential Design Guidelines and
meet applicable roof-pitch and orientation requirements. These standards promote design quality but do not
prevent every cottage from using the same building plan and exterior elevation.
Staff recommends that at least two exterior design schemes be identified on the approved plans. Each scheme
would differ in at least two exterior elements, at least one of which would be something other than color, such as
siding material or pattern, trim details, shutters, porch railings, decorative brackets, or gable treatments. Matching
schemes would not be permitted on cottages located immediately beside or directly opposite one another along the
shared drive aisle or common open space. Each scheme would independently comply with Section 7.2.3.
All other applicable cottage court standards would remain in effect. The proposal would not change density,
setbacks, building separation, lot coverage, parking, or emergency access. It would also retain the requirements for
transient rental use, unified management, a uniform key-entry system, and the prohibition of individual utility
meters. These safeguards support the continued operation of cottage courts as unified short-stay accommodations
rather than separately conveyed single-family dwellings.
Policy Considerations
The 2017 Comprehensive Land Use Plan supports a diversity of visitor accommodations and identifies cottage courts
as an alternative to large single-family vacation rentals and conventional hotels. Land Use Policy LU-1 calls for
buildings with a residential scale and appearance, including low heights and small footprints that reflect Nags
Head’s heritage.
The proposed alternative advances these objectives by limiting every cottage to 1,000 square feet of habitable area
and a one-story form with a limited loft or mezzanine, while retaining the operational, dimensional, management,
and design safeguards of Section 7.2. Staff finds the amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
If the Board of Commissioners is inclined to adopt this proposed text amendment, please reference Appendix A for
Page 3 of 4

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 36 of 72

the Statement of Consistency with the town's adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan requirements (attached).
Attachments
1.
10 F1 PH UDO Small Cottage Alternative ord
2.
10 F1 PH UDO Small Cottage Alternative soc
3.
10 F1 PH UDO Small Cottage Alternative exhibits
4.
10 F1 PH UDO Small Cottage Alternative pn

Page 4 of 4

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 37 of 72

Ordinance No. 26-10-XXX
UDO Small Cottage Alternative
BOC Meeting October 7, 2026

(DRAFT)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF
THE TOWN OF NAGS HEAD, NORTH CAROLINA AS IT PERTAINS TO
ESTABLISHING AN ALTERNATIVE SMALL COTTAGE DESIGN OPTION WITHIN THE
SUPPLEMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COTTAGE COURTS.
ARTICLE I. Purpose(s) and Authority.
WHEREAS, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160D-701, the Town of Nags Head (the “Town”) may enact and
amend ordinances regulating the zoning and development of land within its jurisdiction and
specifically the location and use of buildings, structures and land; pursuant to this authority and the
additional authority granted by N.C.G.S. Chap. 160D-702, the Town has adopted comprehensive
zoning regulations and has codified the same within the Unified Development Ordinance, Part II of
the Town Code, adopted pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160D-103, which allows the Town to combine
certain land development ordinances into a unified ordinance;
WHEREAS, Section 2.4.4.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance provides that the powers and
duties of the Planning Board include developing and recommending policies, ordinances,
development regulations, administrative procedures, and other means for carrying out plans in a
coordinated and efficient manner;
WHEREAS, Section 3.5.1. of the Town Code makes clear that a zoning ordinance text amendment
may be initiated by motion of the Board of Commissioners, by motion of the Planning Board, or by
application by any person within the zoning jurisdiction of the Town;
WHEREAS, George E. Goodrich, has submitted a text amendment request to Section 7.2.2. of the
Unified Development Ordinance to create an alternative to the existing graduated height and
habitable area requirements set forth for cottage courts. Under the alternative, all units would be
limited to 1,000 square feet of habitable area and developed as one-story with a loft or mezzanine.
ARTICLE II. Construction.
For purposes of this ordinance amendment, underlined words (underline) shall be considered as
additions to existing Town Code language and strikethrough words (strikethrough) shall be considered
deletions to existing language. Any portions of the adopted Town Code which are not repeated herein
but are instead replaced by an ellipsis (“...”) shall remain as they currently exist within the Town Code.
ARTICLE III. Amendment of the Unified Development Ordinance.
PART I. That Section 7.2.2. Cottage Courts, Size and Arrangement, shall be amended as
follows:
7.2.2. Size and Arrangement.
Cottage courts shall be designed and intended for transient guests on a rental basis,
with the exception of living quarters for the property owner or on-site management.
Individual dwelling units must be designed and arranged for occupancy by one family
operating as a housekeeping unit. Individual cottages shall contain at least five hundred
(500) square feet. Cottages shall be limited to the following size and design restrictions:
# Of Units
1/3
1/3
1/3

Stories
Shall not exceed 1-story.

Square Footage
Shall not exceed 1,500 sf.
habitable area.

An additional 1/3 of the
units shall not exceed 1 ½
stories.
The remaining 1/3 of the
units shall not exceed two
stories.

Shall not exceed 1,500 sf.
habitable area.
Shall not exceed 1,750 sf.
habitable area.

Page 38 of 72

Ordinance No. 26-10-XXX
UDO Small Cottage Alternative
BOC Meeting October 7, 2026

In addition to the above restrictions, one structure may be up to five thousand (5,000)
square feet if it is combined with on-site management or another complementary
business use. Each cottage court unit shall contain separate sleeping, bathing and living
areas.
7.2.2.1. Alternative Small Cottage Design. As an alternative to the graduated story
and habitable area requirements above, a cottage court may be developed in accordance
with the following standards:
7.2.2.1.1. All cottages within the cottage court shall comply with the alternative smallcottage design standards. The alternative shall not be applied selectively to individual
cottages within a cottage court.
7.2.2.1.2. Each cottage shall contain a minimum of five hundred (500) square feet and
shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet of habitable area.
7.2.2.1.3. Each cottage shall be limited to one (1) story and may include one loft or
mezzanine meeting the requirements of the applicable North Carolina Residential Code.
The floor area of the loft or mezzanine shall be less than fifty percent (50%) of the floor
area of the story immediately below and shall remain open to the story below as
required by the applicable North Carolina Residential Code. In no case shall the upperlevel area constitute an attic story as defined by the North Carolina Residential Code.
Any habitable area within the loft or mezzanine shall be included when calculating the
maximum habitable area permitted for the cottage.
7.2.2.1.4. The cottage court shall incorporate at least two (2) exterior design schemes,
which shall be identified on the approved plans. Each design scheme shall differ from the
other design schemes in at least two (2) of the following elements, at least one (1) of
which shall be an element other than exterior color: exterior color; siding material or
pattern; trim details; shutters; porch railings; decorative brackets; gable treatments; or
similar exterior architectural details. The same exterior design scheme shall not be used
on cottages located immediately beside or directly opposite one another along the
shared drive aisle or common open space. Each cottage and design scheme shall
independently comply with Section 7.2.3.
7.2.2.1.5. All other applicable provisions of Section 7.2 shall remain in effect.
PART II. All Town ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance amendment are
hereby repealed. Should a court of competent jurisdiction declare this ordinance
amendment or any part thereof to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remaining
provisions of this ordinance amendment nor the Unified Development Ordinance or Town
Code of the Town of Nags Head, North Carolina which shall remain in full force and
effect.
PART III.

All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the 7th day of October
2026.
Megan Lambert, Mayor Pro Tem

ATTEST:
Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Attorney
Date adopted:
Motion to adopt by Commissioner
Motion seconded by Commissioner
Vote:
AYES
NAYS

Page 39 of 72

APPENDIX A
SECTION 3.5.4. ACTION BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Pursuant to Section 3.5.4.2. of the UDO, the Board of Commissioners may proceed to
vote on the proposed ordinance, refer it to a committee for further study, or take any
other action consistent with its usual rules of procedure.
Pursuant to Section 3.5.4.5. of the UDO, prior to voting to adopt or reject the proposed
text amendment, the Board should adopt a statement approving the amendment and
describing the amendment’s consistency with the Town’s adopted Comprehensive Plan
and explaining why the action taken is reasonable and in the public interest, a statement
rejecting the amendment and describing its inconsistency with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan and explaining why the action taken is reasonable and in the
public interest, or a statement approving the amendment and containing at least all of
the following:
•

A declaration that the approval is also deemed an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan. The Board of Commissioners shall not require any
additional request or application for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.

•

An explanation of the change in conditions the Board of Commissioners took into
account in amending the UDO to meet the development needs of the community.

•

Why the action was reasonable and in the public interest.

Page 40 of 72

YEAR_BUILT Heated Sq Ft Name
1950
690.00 2FISH
1950
703.00 2FISH
1950
705.00 2FISH
1950
713.00 2FISH
1950
1,958.00 2FISH
1960
812.00 CAHOONS
1960
848.00 CAHOONS
1960
888.00 CAHOONS
1960
910.00 CAHOONS
1960
1,004.00 CAHOONS
1960
1,177.00 CAHOONS
1960
1,320.00 CAHOONS
1960
2,528.00 CAHOONS
1955
486.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
676.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
706.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
708.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
712.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
723.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
877.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
3,082.00 OCEANSIDE COURT
1955
647.00 SANDSPUR
1955
711.00 SANDSPUR
1955
714.00 SANDSPUR
1955
733.00 SANDSPUR
1955
761.00 SANDSPUR
1955
764.00 SANDSPUR
1955
1,996.00 SANDSPUR
1955
2,120.00 SANDSPUR
1955
2,753.00 SANDSPUR
1955
4,911.00 SANDSPUR
1950
519.00 SEA SPRAY
1950
525.00 SEA SPRAY
1950
774.00 SEA SPRAY
1950
1,907.00 SEA SPRAY
1950
1,954.00 SEA SPRAY

Page 41 of 72

Page 42 of 72

Benjamin Cahoon
Mayor

Bob Sanders
Commissioner

Megan Lambert
Mayor Pro Tem

Megan Vaughan
Commissioner

Andy Garman
Town Manager

Town of Nags Head
Post Office Box 99
Nags Head, NC 27959
Telephone 252-441-5508
Fax 252-441-0776
www.nagsheadnc.gov

Molly Harrison
Commissioner

PUBLIC NOTICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Nags Head Board of Commissioners will conduct a public hearing on
Wednesday, October 7, 2026, beginning at 9:00 a.m. in the Board Room of the Municipal Complex, 5401
S Croatan Highway, Nags Head, NC to consider and take action upon the following request:
Public Hearing for a zoning text amendment submitted by George E. Goodrich to amend
Section 7.2.2., Size and Arrangement, of the Supplemental Regulations for Cottage
Courts to establish an alternative to the graduated unit size and story distribution
requirements, allowing all cottage units to be limited to one story and a maximum of
1,000 square feet of habitable floor area.
A copy of the application request will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Town Clerk, Town
Municipal Complex, 5401 S. Croatan Hwy, Nags Head, NC 27959, telephone (252) 441-5508 during normal
business hours.
As a result of this hearing, substantial changes may be made to the proposal as advertised to reflect
objections, debate and discussion at the hearing. Any person desiring to be heard on the proposal as stated
above should appear at the time and place specified above.
This is the 21th day of September 2026.
Brittany A. Phillips
Town Clerk

For publication in the Coastland Times on Wednesday, September 23, 2026 and on Wednesday, September 30, 2026.
Please use Nags Head seal and legal print.

Page 43 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM G.1.
Update from Planning Director

Prepared by
Kelly Wyatt, Planning Director

Reviewed by
Kelly Wyatt
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Please find attached a monthly update from Planning Director Kelly Wyatt that includes permitting and code
enforcement data through August 2026.
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board information and update.
Summary
This memo provides an overview of selected Planning and Development Department activities, projects, and
initiatives. If requested, staff will be prepared to discuss any of this information in detail at the Board of
Commissioners meeting on Wednesday, October 7, 2026.
Monthly Activity Report
In addition to permitting, inspections, code enforcement, and Todd D. Krafft Septic Health Initiative activities, staff
were involved in the following meetings or activities of note during the month of September:
• Tuesday, September 1st — Technical Review Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, September 2nd — Last Night 2026 Summer Concert Series at Dowdy Park
• Wednesday, September 2nd — Board of Commissioners Meeting
• Wednesday, September 9th — Arts and Culture Committee Meeting
• Thursday, September 10th — Board of Adjustment Meeting (no hearings)
• Tuesday, September 15th — Planning Board Meeting
• Wednesday, September 16th — Board of Commissioners Mid-Month (not needed)
• Fridays, September 11th and 25th — Movie Nights at Dowdy Park
Planning Board — Pending Applications and Discussions
At its September 15, 2026 meeting, the Planning Board continued its review of the town’s previous consideration of
accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and discussion of the Commercial Outdoor Recreation Overlay District (CORD). The
board also received a presentation and held preliminary discussions regarding potential UDO amendments related to
tree preservation. No ADU ordinance amendments or regulatory changes were discussed. With ADUs identified as a
Strategic Plan initiative, staff is first providing historical context to ensure the board understands the town’s
previous efforts before considering possible changes. This review is expected to continue over several months.
The Planning Board’s next meeting is scheduled for October 20, 2026. The anticipated agenda includes:
Page 1 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 44 of 72

• Consideration of a UDO text amendment submitted by Anastasiia Forlano to distinguish cosmetic
tattooing/permanent makeup from a traditional tattoo establishment and allow it as an accessory service
within an otherwise permitted beauty salon.
• Consideration of a UDO text amendment to address Session Law 2026-51 and its limitations on local
regulation of “no-impact home-based businesses.”
• Continued discussion of ADUs, Vegetation Preservation revisions, and the Commercial Outdoor Recreation
Overlay District (CORD).
Board of Adjustment – Recent and Pending Applications — There were no items for the Board of
Adjustment's consideration in September 2026.
Additional Updates
• DWMP/Septic Health Advisory Committee — The next Septic Health Advisory Committee meeting is
scheduled for Monday, October 26, 2026. Staff continue to receive inquiries and inspection requests
following the town wide mailer as well as the targeted mailing to approximately 280 properties identified as
potentially vulnerable based on septic-system age, elevation, and proximity to surface waters. This
sustained interest is encouraging and provides opportunities to help property owners understand their
septic-system needs and available assistance.
Staff are also working with Jocelyn Billings, a UNC-Chapel Hill senior majoring in Public Policy, through the
university’s Outer Banks Field Site internship program. Jocelyn is assisting Environmental Planner Conner
Twiddy with septic inspections and collecting GPS locations of septic tanks and drain fields. She is also
collaborating with Deputy Planning Director Joe Costello to incorporate these findings into the town’s
mapping tool for septic infrastructure and historical records. This work strengthens the information available
to support future outreach and planning. Jocelyn is also helping develop marketing and outreach ideas to
encourage participation in the Septic Health Initiative. She is expected to attend the October SHAC meeting,
and staff hope to introduce her and highlight her work at the Board of Commissioners’ November meeting.
• Estuarine Shoreline Management Plan — Staff continue to advance shoreline resiliency projects and have
updated the ESMP website to reflect project progress and changes. Interest is growing in the board-funded
technical assistance grants for private soundside property owners interested in living shorelines or
incorporating natural features into existing shoreline stabilization. The grant agreement is finalized, and staff
are preparing to launch the opportunity.
Harvey/Soundside Event Site Living Shoreline Project: The major permit application remains under review
following revisions to address wetland impacts. Staff and consultants are evaluating agency comments and
potential design adjustments to address concerns about continued access for kite and wind sports. The
Tourism Board’s attorney continues working with the town and NC Land and Water Fund to develop a
conservation easement that protects the Tourism Board’s interests in the property while meeting grant
requirements. Grant extensions have been requested due to permitting delays, with construction tentatively
anticipated in January 2027.
Villa Dunes Drive: Staff and Environmental Professionals, Inc. continue working with property owners to
identify practical shoreline stabilization alternatives that address their concerns and support ESMP goals.
Soundside Road: Staff have requested an RCCP grant scope change to focus on a resiliency berm and
stormwater improvements in place of offshore breakwaters. The project aims to reduce wave overtopping,
enhance habitat, and protect infrastructure. Draft easement language has been shared with property
owners, and additional outreach is planned as consultants finalize the concept design. Permit submission is
anticipated in January 2027, with design development and permits targeted for April 2027.
Page 2 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 45 of 72

Catfish Farm/Causeway: An RCCP grant scope change has been approved to fund living shoreline design at
the Catfish Farm/Causeway area as an alternative to offshore breakwaters at Villa Dunes and Soundside
Road. The project will explore natural shoreline treatments, potentially including oyster reefs, to reduce
erosion, protect wetlands and Causeway infrastructure, and support habitat and water quality. The design
area includes town-owned conservation land and adjoining private properties. Living shoreline
improvements have been confirmed as allowable under the existing conservation easement.
• Parks and Recreation Plan Update — Deputy Planning Director Joe Costello will provide an update on the
Parks and Recreation Plan at the October 7, 2026, Board of Commissioners meeting under agenda item G-2.
• Dowdy Park Events/Farmers Market/Holiday Markets/Art & Culture — Programming is transitioning into fall
and winter following a successful summer season. Yoga in the Park concludes this month after record
participation, with support from Coastal Carolina Vacations & Sales. Family movie nights continue on
October 2nd, 9th, and 23rd, building on strong attendance previously.
Preparations are underway for Dowdy Park Holiday Markets on Saturday, November 14th, November 28th,
and December 12th, with the Annual Dowdy Park Tree Lighting scheduled for November 28th. Vendor
applications for the holiday markets open on Wednesday, October 14th, at 8am with spaces filled on a firstcome, first-served basis once application requirements are met.
Additional October activities include a collaboration with the North Carolina Aquarium to add native plants to
Dowdy Park’s pollinator garden and a children’s fish-printing program with Merv Rubiano of Strategic Angler
Custom Lures at Whalebone Park on Wednesday, October 21st.
At its September 9, 2026, meeting, the Committee for Arts & Culture reviewed seasonal programming and
began exploring ideas for Dowdy Park’s 10th anniversary and the 150th anniversary of the USS Huron
shipwreck, both in 2027. Discussions also included future Art Mast installations.
Upcoming Meetings and Other Dates
• Tuesday, October 6th — Technical Review Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, October 7th — Board of Commissioners Meeting
• Thursday, October 8th — Board of Adjustment Meeting (no hearings)
• Thursday, October 8th — Parks and Recreation Kick-Off Meeting
• Wednesday, October 14th — Arts and Culture Committee Meeting
• Wednesday, October 14th — Holiday Market Application opens at 8am.
• Tuesday, October 20th — Planning Board Meeting
• Wednesday, October 21st — Board of Commissioners Mid-Month (if needed)
• Wednesday, October 21st — Fish Printing with the Strategic Angler at Whalebone Park
• Fridays, October 9th and 23rd — Movie Nights at Dowdy Park
• Monday, October 26th — Septic Health Advisory Committee (SHAC) Meeting
Attachments
1.
10 G1 Planning Monthly Report

Page 3 of 3

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 46 of 72

Page 47 of 72

Page 48 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM G.2.
Discussion of Parks and Recreation Master Plan

Prepared by
Joseph Costello, Deputy Planning Director

Reviewed by
Joseph Costello
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
Staff would recommend reviewing the proposal for project understanding and ask clarifying questions at the
meeting. Please consider a representative from the Board to serve on the steering committee and project team.
Also, please determine if there are other organizations or individuals who should be recommended for inclusion on
the steering committee.
Specific Action Requested
Appoint a Commissioner to the Parks and Rec Steering Committee and Project Team.
Summary
Nags Head's 2026 strategic plan established town goals, strategic priorities, and associated action items. The
highest ranked action item in the strategic plan, item 2.7, under the development goal, is to update the town's
Parks and Recreation Plan.
A Request for Qualifications was posted in August to hire a planning consultant to assist the town in accomplishing
this action item. Submittals were reviewed and negotiations commenced in September. The town selected
Destination by Design, a planning firm with a heavy landscape architecture facet, for our update. They have a
proven track record of developing innovative, community-led, and beautiful planning documents, parks, trails and
facilities across NC and VA. The executed agreement is attached for your review.
Over the next year, Destination by Design and town staff will be working diligently to establish communitysupported priorities and provide a practical framework for future capital improvements, funding, partnerships and
implementation. The planning process will begin with public engagement, which includes a statistically valid survey
and discussions with key stakeholders and organizations. It will then transition to an inventory of our existing
assets, as well as level of service mapping and analysis. Once a plan framework has been established, the
consultant will develop concepts and a series of draft recommendations. The consultant and staff will then host a
community forum to further inform the draft parks and recreation plan. After revisions and iterations of the draft
plan, the final draft parks and recreation master plan will be presented to the BOC for adoption.
As part of this planning effort, a parks and recreation steering committee will need to be established to review
findings, provide technical guidance and recommendations to staff and our consultant at key defined points
throughout the planning process.
Page 1 of 2

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 49 of 72

Separately, a project team will be established which consists of staff members as well as a Commissioner, to be
selected today, that will also serve on the Parks and Recreation Steering Committee.
At this time, staff requests the Board of Commissioners select one representative to serve on the project team and
the Parks and Recreation Steering Committee. The selected Commissioner will serve a crucial role in this planning
process, helping bridge the gap between project team considerations such as the scope, schedule, methods and
project goals while also serving on the Parks and Recreation Steering Committee, which again, is designed to review
findings, react to deliverables, and provide recommendations. The Board member selected will fill a crucial role in
this planning process with an awareness of both the project team discussions while also participating in the Parks
and Recreation Steering Committee deliberations. The Project Kickoff will take place virtually on Thursday, October
8th in the Town's Library Room starting at 2 pm.
The rest of the Parks and Recreation Steering Committee will need to be established at the November Board of
Commissioners meeting. Staff requests that Board members review the proposed committee composition and
provide feedback on whether it represents an adequate cross-section of the community. We would also like Board
members to come prepared with suggestions for individuals to fill those positions in anticipation of officially
appointing them at the November meeting.
Staff recommends the following committee composition:
• One Planning Board member
• One BOC member, selected as noted above
• One Committee for Arts & Culture member
• One Friends of Jockey’s Ridge representative
• Representation from the YMCA
• Two at-large members
There is not a specific limit to the size or composition of the committee. However, it should generally reflect a crosssection of the community, with engaged key stakeholders and knowledgeable members, and maintain a reasonable
total number of appointed representatives.
Attachments
1.
10 G2 Parks and Rec_DBD_signed

Page 2 of 2

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 50 of 72

Page 51 of 72

Page 52 of 72

Page 53 of 72

Page 54 of 72

Page 55 of 72

Page 56 of 72

Page 57 of 72

Page 58 of 72

Page 59 of 72

Principal

9/24/26

Page 60 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM H.1.
Committee Reports

Prepared by
Brittany Phillips, Town Clerk

Reviewed by
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
N/A
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board information and update.
Summary
At the October 7, 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting, board members will provide reports from meetings they
have attended on behalf of the town.
Attachments
None

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 61 of 72

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners
REGULAR SESSION: October 7, 2026

AGENDA ITEM H.2.
Consideration of Appointments/Reappointments to Boards/Committees
- NH Firefighters' Relief Fund Board
- Personnel Grievance Panel
- Planning Board

Prepared by
Katie Anzalone, Deputy Town Clerk

Reviewed by
Katie Anzalone
Brittany Phillips
Andy Garman

Staff Comments/Recommendation
N/A
Specific Action Requested
This item is provided for board appointments/reappointments.
Summary
At the October 7, 2026 Board of Commissioners meeting, request board consideration of the following
appointments:
Firefighters' Relief Fund:
-Rose Lay moved out of Nags Head.
Personnel Grievance Panel:
-Jeanne Kramer's term expires November 1, 2026. She is interested in being reappointed.
Planning Board:
-David Thompson's term expires December 6, 2026. He is interested in being reappointed.
Attached please find the current Rosters and Candidate Charts.
Attachments
1.
10 H2 CURRENT - Firefighters' Relief Fund
2.
10 H2 CANDIDATE - Firefighters' Relief Fund
3.
10 H2 CURRENT - Personnel Grievance Panel
4.
10 H2 CANDIDATE - Personnel Grievance Panel
5.
10 H2 CURRENT - Planning Board
6.
10 H2 CANDIDATE - Planning Board

Page 1 of 1

PO Box 99, Nags Head, NC | (252) 441-5508 | nagsheadnc.gov
Page 62 of 72

Town of Nags Head CURRENT
Firefighters’ Relief Fund Board of Trustees

Name of
Board/Committee

Firefighters’ Relief
Fund Board of
Trustees

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Current members

Contact Info

Last appointed date

Seat expires

Eligible for Reappointment

Dorie Fuller
(Chair)

Phone/email on file

2023

N/A

N/A

Appointed by NC
Commissioner of
Insurance

Rose Lay

Phone/email on file

05/2024

05/2026

Moved outside Nags
Head*

Appointed by
Governing Body

Anne Farmer

Phone/email on file

01/2026

01/2028

Not expired

Appointed by
Governing Body

Phil Wolfe

Phone/email on file

12/2017

N/A

N/A

Appointed by
Fire Dept

Scott Hooper

Phone/email on file

12/2012

N/A

N/A

Appointed by
Fire Dept

Notes

1
Page 63 of 72

CANDIDATES Characteristic Chart – Firefighters’ Relief Fund

Applicant Name

Tina Adderholdt
(8/13/26)

John Kenny
(8/31/26)

Bd/Comm
Interested
in Serving

FRF

FRF

Yrs of
Residency

19 yrs

40 yrs

Location of
Residency

Southridge

Kitty Dunes

Role in
Community

Attributes to offer
Bd/Comm

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026
Special Interest in
Bd/Comm

Currently serving on
Town Bd/Comm

Retired

President and treasurer
for Nags Head
Community Watch
Assoc.

Volunteerism

Yes – Personnel
Grievance Panel and
Board of Adjustment.
Would have to relinquish
one of these to be chosen
for another Board

Retired Fire
Capt

Almost 34 yrs as a
firefighter; participant
with the Chicamacomico
reenactment team past
2 yrs

Previously on the Relief
Fund as a firefighter for
several years

No

Page 64 of 72

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Town of Nags Head CURRENT - Personnel Grievance Panel

Name of
Board/Committee

Current members

Contact Info

Last appointed date

Seat expires

Eligible for Reappointment

Personnel Grievance Panel
Meets as necessary

Jeanne Kramer

Phone/email on file

11/1/23

11/1/26

Yes

Tina Adderholdt

Phone/email on file

10/2/24

10/2/27

Jean Flanigan

Phone/email on file

6/7/26

6/7/29

3 Registered Voters
3 Alternates

Notes

Term not expired

3-year term
Term not expired

Vacant (ALT)

Vacant (ALT)

Vacant (ALT)

Page 65 of 72

CANDIDATES Characteristic Chart – Personnel Grievance Panel

Applicant Name

Deane McGeary
(1/10/25)

Mary K Gay
(3/10/25)

Michael Rogers
(9/25/25)

Bd/Comm
Interested in
Serving

PGP

PGP/Planning Bd

PGP/Planning
Bd/DAAB/BOA

Yrs of
Residency

1 yr

1 yr

1 yr

Location of
Residency

Southridge

NH Cove

NH Cove

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Role in
Community

Attributes to offer
Bd/Comm

Special Interest in
Bd/Comm

Currently serving
on Town
Bd/Comm

Just moved here
for retirement

Previously
responsible for
processing,
investigating
inmate grievances.
Provided audits of
grievance
programs in NY
County Jails

Would like serve
community by
participating in town
government

No

NH Cove HOA,
Board of Directors
Hampton Roads
Youth Vol Corp,
ACS Fundraising
Committee

Leader with skills
in technology and
business
processes,
excelling in
strategic planning,
financial
operations,
engineering,
process analysis,
product
management,
financial controls,
and program
delivery

Servant leadership is part
of core values as an Army
veteran. Have now
retired and want to share
experience.

Yes, BOA Alternate

Retired
construction
business over

Served on boards
outside NH;
experienced in
construction
management,
budgeting,
financials and
project
management.

Has young children and
has a vested interest in
future of community,
and desire to serve in
community with gained
experience.

NH Volunteer
Firefighter

Page 66 of 72

CANDIDATES Characteristic Chart – Personnel Grievance Panel

Applicant Name

Robert T. Snyder
(1/7/26)

Bd/Comm
Interested in
Serving

PGP/Planning
Bd/Arts & Culture

Yrs of
Residency

14 yrs

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Location of
Residency

Role in
Community

Attributes to offer
Bd/Comm

Special Interest in
Bd/Comm

Currently serving
on Town
Bd/Comm

Dune
Lantern

Condo Assoc
President 23 yrs.
Served on
Tourism Board,
Board of Tourism
and Maritime
Museum Board of
Governors in MD.

Previously served
12 yrs as
Commissioner in
St. Michaels, MD.

Would like serve
community by
participating in town
government

Appointed to
Dangerous Animal
Appeal Board
March 6, 2024 and
as BOA (ALT)
January 8, 2025

Page 67 of 72

Town of Nags Head CURRENT - Planning Board

Name of
Board/Committee

Planning Board
3rd Tuesday at 9:00
7 members
3-year term

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Current members

Contact Info

Last appointed date

Seat expires

Eligible for Reappointment

Meade Gwinn
Chair

Phone/email on file

12/4/24

12/4/27

Term not expired

David Elder
Vice-Chair

Phone/email on file

6/7/26

6/7/29

Term not expired

David Thompson

Phone/email on file

12/6/23

12/6/26

Yes

Basil Belsches

Phone/email on file

3/5/25

3/5/28

Term not expired

Bradley Carey

Phone/email on file

6/11/25

6/11/28

Term not expired

Beverly Head

Phone/email on file

12/3/25

12/3/28

Term not expired

Valerie Netsch

Phone/email on file

12/3/25

12/3/28

Term not expired

Notes

1
Page 68 of 72

CANDIDATES Characteristic Chart – Planning Board
Applicant Name
(Application
Received)

Bd/Comm
Interested in
Serving

Barbara Ayars
(11/20/24)

BOA/Arts &
Culture/
Planning Bd

Mary K Gay
(3/10/25)

William Simmonds
(7/3/25)

Planning Bd/PGP

Planning Bd/BOA

Yrs of
Residency

Location
of
Residency

10 yrs

Gallery
Row

1 yr

10 yrs

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026
Role in Community

Attributes to offer
Bd/Comm

Special Interest in
Bd/Comm

Currently serving on
Town Bd/Comm

Retired attorney

Knowledge of
environmental law

Assist w/maintaining
a balance between
ecosystem
protection and use

No, (was previous
member of NH Focus
Technical Committee)

NH Cove

NH Cove HOA,
Board of Directors
Hampton Roads
Youth Vol Corp,
ACS Fundraising
Committee

Leader with skills in
technology and business
processes, excelling in
strategic planning,
financial operations,
engineering, process
analysis, product
management, financial
controls, and program
delivery

Servant leadership is
part of core values as
an Army veteran. Has
now retired and
wants to share
experience.

Yes, BOA Alternate

NH Pond

Retired construction
project manager
and environmental
engineer, Beach
Food Pantry
Volunteer

Chaired committee
responsible for decision
making for land use and
development at Kennedy
Space Center.

Michael Rogers
(9/25/25)

Planning
Bd/BOA/
PGP/DAAB

1 yr

NH Cove

Retired construction
business owner

Served on boards outside
NH; experienced in
construction
management, budgeting,
financials and project
management.

Kristen Hamrick
(11/3/25)

Planning Bd

7 yrs

Village of
NH

NHES PTO, HOA
board

Invested in her
community for her family
and others

Desire to help shape
the future of NH and
serve the community
by being involved in
decision process for
land use, zoning, and
community
development.
Has young children
and has a vested
interest in future of
community, and
desire to serve in
community with
gained experience.
Has young children
and desires to
contribute to
keeping NH a
beautiful community
to live in

No, (was previous
member of NH
DWMP and
Pedestrian Project
Advisory
Committees)

NH Volunteer
Firefighter

No

Page 69 of 72

CANDIDATES Characteristic Chart – Planning Board

Applicant Name
(Application
Received)

John Juzwiak
(11/13/25)

Kimberly Daniels
(11/17/25)

Megan Douds
(11/19/25)

Bd/Comm
Interested in
Serving

Planning Bd

Planning Bd

Planning Bd

Yrs of
Residency

18 yrs

22 yrs

7 yrs

Location
of
Residency

Village of
NH

NH Cove

Northridge

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Role in Community

Attributes to offer
Bd/Comm

Special Interest in
Bd/Comm

Retired Engineer
and Manager

Served as director and VP
of the VNH POA; Served
as director and current
president of Ridges POA;
Chaired the VNH ACC and
Common Elements
Committee and rebuilt
much of the aging
facilities

Personal Trainer

Supported the
installation of a
playground in Old Nags
Head Cove; supports the
SPCA; 2003-2012 works
for the YMCA; supports
local businesses

Assist the Town in
addressing the need
to allow for new
development while
maintaining small
town family feel. Has
loved Nags Head for
almost 50 yrs and
wants to preserve it.
Goal setter, strong
sense of community
and family, open
minded to others
viewpoints. Cares
about community
and future of NH and
maintaining its
beauty, charm and
history

Licensed Real Estate
Transaction
Coordinator

Seafood Festival
Committee member
2022-2023; ESL instructor
2020; member of Outer
Banks Assoc. of Realtors
since 2020; licensed
realtor

Want to get more
involved in
community and
represent NH
residents, want to
help further the
Town’s vision to
preserve our unique
coastal environment

Currently serving on
Town Bd/Comm

No (was previous
member of Focus
Nags Head Citizens
Committee)

No

No

Page 70 of 72

CANDIDATES Characteristic Chart – Planning Board

Applicant Name
(Application
Received)

Keith Sawyer
(11/25/25)

Adonis Osekre
(12/11/25)

Estella Cummings
(12/24/25)

Bd/Comm
Interested in
Serving

Planning Bd

Planning
Bd/BOA/Arts &
Culture

Planning Bd

Yrs of
Residency

18 yrs

12 yrs

20 yrs

Location
of
Residency

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Role in Community

Attributes to offer
Bd/Comm

Special Interest in
Bd/Comm

Currently serving on
Town Bd/Comm

S Nags
Head

Business Manager,
Claims Appraiser,
Adjuster

Studied Business Admin
and Mngmt at
COA/GMU/Crawford
Univ., and environment
at NC State, Wash. Co.
EMT for 12 yrs, NH Beach
Road Committee and
Beach Nourishment
Committee

To assist in providing
a better and uniform
community with
common sense and
practical solutions

No, (was previous
member of Beach
Nourishment
Committee)

NH Cove

Park Ranger with
NPS, Leadership OBX
cohort 2025-26, Chair
– Friends of the
Outer Banks History
Center, Public
Speaker for Dare
County Events and
Cultural Institutions,
Substitute teacher
for Dare County
Schools

20+ yrs of experience as
public history interpreter
with the US Capitol and
NPC, Chair of Friends of
the Outer Banks History
Center, Skilled public
speaker, event planner,
and community
connector

Cares deeply about
cultural life and
creative spirit of NH,
brings experience in
public history,
storytelling, and civic
engagement, wants
to foster community.

No

CFO for OneBoat,
Inc.

Construction and real
estate experience,
attending master
program with Penn State
in Geo Design, finance
background, Member of
the American Society of
Concrete Contractors,
Master Gardener by the
NC Extension Office and
Volunteer at the
Elizabethan Gardens,
Volunteer for Outer
Banks Hotline

Align the town’s
growth with the
values of its
residents, to help
protect and preserve
fragile environment,
sustainability

No

Village of
NH

Page 71 of 72

CANDIDATES Characteristic Chart – Planning Board

Applicant Name
(Application
Received)

Robert T. Snyder
(1/7/26)

Bd/Comm
Interested in
Serving

Planning Bd/Arts
& Culture/PGP

Yrs of
Residency

14 yrs

Meeting Date: October 7, 2026

Location
of
Residency

Role in Community

Dune
Lantern

Condo Assoc
President 23 yrs.
Served on Tourism
Board, Board of
Tourism and
Maritime Museum
Board of Governors
in MD.

Attributes to offer
Bd/Comm

Previously served 12 yrs
as Commissioner in St.
Michaels, MD.

Special Interest in
Bd/Comm

Currently serving on
Town Bd/Comm

Would like serve
community by
participating in town
government

Appointed to
Dangerous Animal
Appeal Board March
6, 2024 and as BOA
(ALT) January 8, 2025
– Would have to
relinquish one of
these to be chosen
for another Board

Page 72 of 72