★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

I’m glad that Fort Wayne is reevaluating the use of Flock cameras.

Rep. Marlin Stutzman · 2 months ago

The short version: A state rep's approval of Fort Wayne's Flock review is a reminder that even officials are questioning ALPR deals once the public starts asking questions.

Our Take

When a sitting state representative publicly welcomes a city reconsidering its Flock Safety contract, that's a signal worth paying attention to. Rep. Marlin Stutzman doesn't give us much detail in this clip, but the fact that Fort Wayne officials are even pausing to reevaluate suggests the usual sales pitch — "just trust us, it's only for solving crimes" — isn't landing the way it used to. These cameras get installed fast and rarely get a second look once they're up, so any public reevaluation is notable.

This is the pattern we track constantly at DeFlock: a city council or vendor contract sails through with minimal scrutiny, and only after residents or watchdogs start asking about retention windows, data-sharing agreements, and who else can query the system does anyone in office admit the deal deserves another look. Fort Wayne joining that conversation, even quietly, is a win for the broader push to get these networks audited rather than rubber-stamped.

If you're in Indiana or anywhere else wondering whether your local streets are already wired up, check our camera map to see what's been documented nearby, and visit our take-action page for tools to push your own city council toward the kind of reevaluation Fort Wayne is reportedly having.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Rep. Marlin Stutzman, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.