★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Thursday headlines

11Alive · 20 hours ago

The short version: 11Alive reports a Tennessee officer's proposed class action against Flock Safety, another sign the ALPR industry's legal exposure is growing fast.

Our Take

11Alive's Thursday headlines roundup flags a proposed class action filed by a Tennessee officer against Atlanta-based Flock Safety — worth watching even though the segment is brief. Lawsuits like this matter because they test the legal theory undergirding the entire ALPR business model: that scanning every plate, every driver, everywhere, without a warrant or individualized suspicion, is somehow not a search. Courts are increasingly being asked to weigh in, and each new filing chips away at the assumption that mass camera networks get a free pass just because they're marketed as a public safety tool.

The mention of warrants tied to the case also underscores something we track closely: how law enforcement actually uses Flock's data once it's collected, and how thin the guardrails often are. A camera at a bus stop or intersection can quietly become part of a nationwide surveillance dragnet, shared across agencies with little public accountability. That's exactly why local pushback — whether through lawsuits, public records requests, or city council fights — keeps mattering.

If you want to see how many of these cameras are already watching your own streets, check our map, and if you're ready to push back locally, our take action page has concrete next steps. Credit to 11Alive for surfacing this story in their headlines segment.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of 11Alive, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.