AI-DRIVEN MASS SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
The short version: Jen's Two Cents dug into Flock cameras in Goodyear, Arizona, and found the usual stonewalling from both the company and city officials.
Our Take
Credit to Jen's Two Cents and the Jen & Friends Podcast for doing the legwork most local newsrooms skip: actually calling up privacy experts and asking hard questions about what these cameras do once your plate gets scanned. Five hours of interviews boiled down into one video is a real public service, and we're glad to see West Valley residents getting a look at what's been quietly bolted onto their street poles.
The part that jumps out isn't new, but it never stops being telling — Flock Safety wouldn't sit down for an interview, and neither would the City of Goodyear. That silence is practically a company policy at this point. When a system is marketed as a simple license plate reader but is capable of tracking vehicle make, color, bumper stickers, and travel patterns, and that data gets shared across a network of agencies with little public oversight, 'no comment' isn't a neutral answer. It's a signal that the people installing these cameras would rather you not ask who sees your movements or how long they're kept.
This is exactly the pattern we track nationwide: a city council approves a few cameras for 'stolen vehicles,' and suddenly there's a surveillance dragnet nobody voted on in plain terms. If you want to see whether Flock has already landed in your neighborhood, check our camera map, and if you're ready to push back at a city council meeting like the one in Goodyear, our take-action page has the tools to get started.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Jen's Two Cents. | Jen & Friends Podcast, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.