★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Flock cameras are spying on you - whether that's good or bad depends on you

KRLD News · 2 months ago

The short version: A local TV segment frames Flock ALPRs as neutral tools whose impact depends on 'you' — we think that framing lets the real accountability questions off the hook.

Our Take

KRLD News in Dallas-Fort Worth takes the classic local-news approach to Flock Safety: explain the tech, quote the sales pitch about solved crimes, and land on a tidy conclusion that whether these cameras are "good or bad depends on you." Credit to the KRLD team for at least putting the topic in front of a broad TV audience, but that framing does a lot of quiet work. It shifts responsibility from the police departments signing contracts and the companies building nationwide license-plate databases onto individual drivers, as if you can opt out of being photographed on public roads.

Here's what that framing tends to leave out: these cameras don't just catch the plate of a car reported stolen. They log every plate that passes, build a searchable history of where you've been and when, and feed that history into a network that other agencies — sometimes far outside your city, sometimes with far looser rules — can query. "Depends on you" implies consent and choice. Most residents living near a Flock camera never voted on it, weren't told how long the data is kept, and have no idea which agencies can pull their travel history.

That's the gap we exist to fill. If a segment like this makes you want to know whether a camera is watching your own street, check our camera map to see what's already installed near you, and if you'd rather not leave it up to chance, our take-action page has concrete steps for pushing back at your next city council meeting.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of KRLD News, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.