Ex-Chief Stalked Ex With Flock Cameras: Abuse Exposed! #shorts

Our Take

Credit to Security News Today for surfacing this one, because it's the exact nightmare scenario critics of Flock Safety have been warning about since day one: the technology isn't just vulnerable to outside hackers, it's vulnerable to the badge-holders themselves. A former police chief allegedly ran over 600 searches on his ex-girlfriend using a system that's supposed to be reserved for solving crimes, not settling personal scores. If the allegations hold up, this isn't a glitch in the system — it IS the system working exactly as designed, just pointed at the wrong target.

Flock and police departments love to talk about audit logs and "authorized use only" policies, but logs only catch abuse after the fact, if anyone's even looking. There's no real-time check stopping an officer, chief, or dispatcher with login credentials from typing in a plate and pulling someone's entire movement history — where they sleep, where they work, who they visit. Six hundred-plus queries doesn't happen because of one slip-up; it happens when nobody's watching the watchers for months or years at a time.

This is why we keep saying local oversight can't be an afterthought. Every department running these cameras needs hard audit requirements, public reporting, and real consequences — not just a policy PDF nobody reads. Check our camera map to see what's watching your neighborhood, and hit up our take-action page if you want to push your local council to put actual guardrails on this stuff before it's your data in someone's search history.