★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Milford residents call for removal of Flock cameras

WFSB 3 · 2 months ago

The short version: Milford residents are pushing back on Flock ALPRs, and WFSB's report shows local pushback can force a real conversation about surveillance overreach.

Our Take

Credit to WFSB 3 for putting a camera on the camera problem. When residents in a town like Milford start showing up to say "take these things down," that's not a fringe reaction — it's a sign that people are waking up to what these systems actually do. Flock's pitch is always "just plates," but the reality is a permanent, searchable log of every car that passes a fixed point, including make and model, timestamped and often shared well beyond the town line through Flock's national network.

What makes stories like this important is that they puncture the assumption that these deployments are settled, harmless infrastructure. They're not. Most towns adopt Flock through a quiet vote or a police department demo, with little public debate about retention periods, audit logs, or who else gets access to the data. When residents push back after the fact, it's often because they never got a real say in the first place — and that's exactly the dynamic that lets a surveillance network expand quietly, one town at a time.

If you're in Connecticut or anywhere else wondering whether your street already has one of these cameras watching it, check our camera map to see what's been documented near you. And if Milford's residents have you thinking about your own town council meeting, our take-action page has the tools to help you make the same case.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of WFSB 3, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.