★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Lake Elsinore City Council Approves Flock Cameras Despite Unanswered Questions & Public Concerns

Rivco News · 9 months ago

The short version: Lake Elsinore's council rubber-stamped a Flock camera expansion in a unanimous vote, brushing aside residents' questions instead of answering them.

Our Take

Credit to Rivco News for sitting through another one of these meetings so the rest of us don't have to. The pattern is numbingly familiar: a police department wants more ALPR coverage, a handful of residents show up with legitimate questions about data retention, access logs, and mission creep, and the council votes unanimously anyway. "Unanswered questions" isn't a bug in this process — it's the process. Nobody on these dais is fumbling for these systems; they're deciding to approve first and figure out the details later, if ever.

What makes this worth writing about isn't Lake Elsinore specifically. It's that this exact script is running in city council chambers all over the country, on the same night, with the same non-answers. Flock's sales pitch is polished, the vendor is in the room to reassure electeds, and the public comment period is treated as a formality to get through rather than input that might change the outcome. A unanimous vote after unresolved public concern isn't consensus — it's a council that already made up its mind before anyone walked up to the podium.

If you live in Riverside County or anywhere else and want to know what's already watching your commute, check our camera map to see what's been deployed near you. And if your own city is quietly teeing up a similar vote, our take-action resources walk through how to get organized before the council chambers empty out and the cameras go up.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Rivco News, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.