★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

249 Arrests, One Question: Will Croydon's Facial Recognition Cases Survive Court?

CaraComp · 5 months ago

The short version: CaraComp digs into Croydon's 249 live facial-recognition arrests in 13 months, raising the same due-process questions Americans should ask about Flock's growing camera network.

Our Take

Credit to CaraComp for pulling the thread on London's live facial recognition rollout in Croydon. Two hundred forty-nine arrests sounds like a win for police PR, but the real story is whether those cases hold up once defense attorneys start asking how the algorithm flagged their client in the first place. That's the exact fight brewing here in the States, except our version runs on license plates instead of faces, and it's already networked across thousands of communities most residents never voted on.

The pattern is familiar: law enforcement adopts a biometric or algorithmic tool, touts arrest numbers as proof of success, and only later do courts and civil liberties groups get a real look at error rates, misidentifications, and how the tech actually performs under cross-examination. Flock Safety's ALPR cameras operate on the same trust-us-first, audit-later model. When the data quietly moves between police departments, gets shared with federal agencies, or ropes in people who were never suspects, the burden falls on ordinary people to prove they were wronged, not on the vendors or agencies to prove the system works.

Watch the video, then take a hard look at what's watching you. Check our camera map to see if Flock has already set up shop near you, and if it has, head to our take-action page for concrete steps to push back before your local department racks up its own untested arrest count.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of CaraComp, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.