★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

CT’s license plate reader debate intensifies as Flock Safety speaks out and one town removes came...

WFSB 3 · 2 months ago

The short version: Connecticut's ALPR fight boils over as Gov. Lamont calls for a pause on new cameras, Flock pushes back, and one town yanks its readers.

Our Take

WFSB 3's report captures something we don't see often enough: a governor actually hitting pause on ALPR expansion instead of rubber-stamping it. Gov. Lamont telling towns to hold off on new license plate readers and safety cameras until Connecticut has real data rules is a tacit admission that these systems got rolled out ahead of any meaningful oversight. That's the pattern nationwide — vendors like Flock Safety sign up police departments and HOAs first, and the policy conversation happens years later, if it happens at all.

What's notable here is that Flock felt the need to respond publicly, and that at least one Connecticut town decided the safest move was to just take its cameras down. That's a rare reversal. Most municipalities that adopt ALPR networks never revisit the decision, even as the footprint of tracked plates grows and data-sharing agreements multiply behind closed doors. Credit to WFSB 3 for putting a spotlight on the pushback instead of treating camera expansion as an inevitability.

If you want to see how dense this surveillance grid already is near you, check our camera map, and if your town is debating a Flock contract, our take-action page has the questions worth asking before anyone signs.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of WFSB 3, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.