★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

A city councilman makes a desperate appeal to his fellow representatives to vote against Flock

Orwell Day · 3 weeks ago

The short version: A lone city councilman's resigned but honest objection to Flock cameras shows how 'inevitable' surveillance votes get rubber-stamped before residents even know what's on the table.

Our Take

Credit to the channel Orwell Day for capturing a moment that plays out in council chambers across the country far more often than most residents realize. A single representative stands up, says plainly that Flock cameras are "Big Brother watching everything," admits he knows he's going to lose the vote, and sits back down. That resignation is the real story here — not just the surveillance itself, but the sense among elected officials that these contracts are a foregone conclusion before the public even gets a say.

That's exactly the dynamic we track at DeFlock The USA. Flock's pitch to city councils is almost always framed as a narrow tool for solving specific crimes, but the architecture being approved is a permanent, networked log of every plate that passes a camera — searchable, shareable, and rarely subject to the kind of oversight a power like that deserves. One councilman's gut check that "I don't want to spy on our citizens" is worth more than the glossy vendor slideshow that precedes it, because it names what's actually being voted on.

If you want to see whether this fight is already happening in your own city, check our camera map to find Flock deployments near you, and visit our take-action page for ways to show up before your council's vote feels as inevitable as this one did.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Orwell Day, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.