★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

How Flock is Actually Hurting Law Enforcement

TREX LABS · 2 weeks ago

The short version: TREX LABS argues Flock's ALPR dragnet doesn't just erode privacy — it can actually undermine the police work it's sold to support.

Our Take

TREX LABS flips the usual script on Flock Safety: instead of just cataloging the privacy harms, the video makes the case that blanket ALPR surveillance can actually backfire on the law enforcement agencies that deploy it. That's worth sitting with. When departments lean on automated hits instead of real investigative work, you get weaker chains of custody, more room for false positives, and officers trained to trust a database ping over their own judgment. A tool marketed as a force multiplier can just as easily become a crutch — and a liability — in court.

This matters because the pro-surveillance pitch always assumes ALPR networks are a clean win for "public safety," with privacy as the only cost. If the technology is also degrading the quality of policing itself, that argument collapses from both directions. We've said it before: mass camera networks don't make communities safer just because they make them more watched.

Credit to TREX LABS for digging into this angle instead of rehashing the standard talking points. If you want to see how many of these cameras are already running in your area, check our camera map, and if you're ready to push back locally, our take-action page has the tools to get started.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of TREX LABS, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.