Murfreesboro residents speak out against Flock cameras after city renews contract
The short version: Murfreesboro residents pushed back on Flock ALPRs at a council meeting, but the city renewed the contract anyway, showing how little public pressure sways these deals.
Our Take
Credit to WSMV 4 Nashville for showing up and documenting what's becoming a familiar pattern across the country: residents show up, make their case, and get overruled anyway. Murfreesboro's council heard real concerns from real constituents about a surveillance network that tracks every car that passes a camera, and the response was essentially "thanks for coming out" followed by a signature on a renewed contract. That's not how accountability is supposed to work.
What's frustrating is that this isn't a close call requiring years of study. Flock's own audit trails have shown up in cases involving stalking, harassment, and misuse by officers running plates for personal reasons. Councils keep renewing anyway, often citing vague crime-fighting stats that Flock itself supplies, with little independent verification. When the public asks pointed questions and gets brushed off, it tells you who these contracts are actually built to serve, and it's not the taxpayers footing the bill.
Murfreesboro won't be the last city where this fight plays out, and it shouldn't be the last time residents organize against it either. If you want to see whether these cameras have already gone up near you, check our camera map, and if you're ready to push back at your own city council, our take-action page has resources to help you get organized before the next contract renewal sneaks through.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of WSMV 4 Nashville, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.