★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Are RING Cameras PRIVATE?

Naomi Brockwell TV · 4 years ago

The short version: Naomi Brockwell TV digs into whether Ring doorbells are truly 'private,' and the answer is a familiar mess of police partnerships, data sharing, and fine print most owners never read.

Our Take

Credit to Naomi Brockwell TV for pulling apart the marketing language around Ring and asking the question every homeowner should ask before bolting a camera to their door: private from whom? Ring is a different company than Flock Safety, but the two live in the same surveillance ecosystem — one blankets your porch, the other blankets your streets, and both have spent years building pipelines that hand footage to police with minimal friction and even less public accountability.

That's the part that should bother you. It's not just that these cameras record you; it's that the data doesn't stay in a private vault. Ring has a long history of law enforcement partnerships and request portals that let police ask neighbors for footage directly, often without a warrant. Flock's ALPR network does the same thing at scale for license plates, building a searchable log of where your car has been. Individually these systems seem like harmless convenience products. Stacked together, they're the closest thing America has to a decentralized, crowd-funded surveillance state — paid for by consumers, operated for cops.

If a video about a doorbell camera makes you uneasy, the automated license plate reader bolted to a pole down your street should make you more uneasy — it's recording every car, every day, no consent required. Check our camera map to see what's already watching your neighborhood, and hit take action if you want to push back.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Naomi Brockwell TV, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.