Group’s petition seeks removal of Flock license plate cameras in Tyler
The short version: Tyler residents are petitioning to yank Flock cameras, and KLTV 7's report shows the same old defense: 'it's not facial recognition, so don't worry.'
Our Take
Credit to KLTV 7 for giving airtime to a local petition effort in Tyler, Texas — these grassroots pushes rarely make it past the city council comment period, let alone onto the evening news. But the official line quoted in the piece, that the system "doesn't use any facial recognition" and just "captures a single point in time," is the same talking point Flock Safety reps feed to every city council in the country. It's technically true and functionally meaningless. You don't need a face to build a surveillance net — a plate number, a timestamp, and a GPS coordinate are plenty to reconstruct where someone lives, works, worships, or gets medical care, especially once that single snapshot gets stacked with thousands of others and shared across a statewide or national network.
That's the part city officials conveniently leave out: these cameras don't operate in isolation. Data gets pooled, queried by out-of-state agencies, and retained well past the moment it was "just a single point in time." Tyler residents pushing back aren't being paranoid; they're asking the basic question every city should answer before signing a Flock contract — who can access this, for how long, and under what oversight. Most towns never get that question answered before the cameras go up.
If you want to see whether your own neighborhood has quietly joined this network, check our camera map, and if you're ready to push back like Tyler residents are doing, our take-action page has tools to help you start that fight locally.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of KLTV 7, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.