★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Flock Cameras at Gun Range: Criminal Surveillance? #shorts

Revenge Of The Cis · 1 month ago

The short version: A creator at Revenge Of The Cis spots a Flock camera posted up at a secluded gun range, raising the obvious question: why log who's exercising a constitutional right?

Our Take

Credit to Revenge Of The Cis for pointing the camera (so to speak) at the cameras. A Flock ALPR parked at the entrance of an out-of-the-way gun range isn't there to catch much of anything in real time — it's there to build a database. Every plate that rolls in gets timestamped, geotagged, and stored, creating a quiet record of who visits a place where people go to exercise their Second Amendment rights. That's a strange thing to find sitting unattended at a rural range, and it's exactly the kind of mismatch between stated purpose and actual capability that should make any gun owner, privacy advocate, or just plain skeptical American pay attention.

This is the pattern we track constantly: these systems get pitched as tools for solving specific crimes, but the plate-by-plate dragnet doesn't care whether you're a suspect or just someone driving down a road that happens to lead to a range, a church, a clinic, or a protest. Once that data exists, it doesn't stay local. It gets shared, pooled, and searched by agencies far beyond the one that installed the camera, with little in the way of a warrant requirement standing in the way.

If you want to know whether there's a Flock camera on your own route — to the range, to work, or just around the block — check our camera map. And if you'd rather not just watch this happen, our take-action page has concrete steps for pushing back at the local level.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Revenge Of The Cis, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.