★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Who Really Controls Michigan ALPR Data?

The Mitten Grip · 2 months ago

The short version: The Mitten Grip makes a sharp point: HOA-owned Flock cameras can still hand your driving history to police, so 'private' funding is no privacy guarantee.

Our Take

Credit to The Mitten Grip for cutting through a assumption a lot of homeowners make: that because their HOA bought the cameras, the data stays in-house. It doesn't work that way. Flock Safety's business model is built around sharing — the whole pitch to neighborhood associations includes the ability to flip a switch and grant local police department access to the network. Ownership of the hardware and control over the data are two completely different things, and most residents never read the fine print that separates them.

This matters because HOA-installed ALPRs sit in a legal gray zone that law enforcement loves. A police department that wanted to blanket a neighborhood with license plate tracking but didn't want to deal with public budget approval, city council debate, or public records requests can just let a private HOA buy the cameras and then ask nicely for access. The result is the same dragnet, minus the oversight. Residents who think they're paying for a gated-community amenity are often unknowingly building an arm of a regional surveillance network.

If you live in or near a community with Flock cameras, it's worth asking your HOA board directly: who has login access, is there a data-sharing agreement with any police agency, and how long are plate reads retained. Check our camera map to see what's already been documented near you, and visit our take-action page for language you can bring to your next board meeting.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of The Mitten Grip, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.