★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

The Truth About Flock Cameras!!!

The Wayman Law Group · 7 months ago

The short version: A Missouri defense attorney breaks down how Flock ALPR cameras work and the Fourth Amendment questions raised by statewide license plate surveillance.

Our Take

Credit to Matt Wayman of The Wayman Law Group for coming at this from an angle we don't see enough: a criminal defense attorney walking everyday drivers through what these cameras actually capture and how that data ends up in a police file. When the people building court arguments start publicly explaining that a drive to the grocery store is now a timestamped, geotagged data point, that's a sign the technology has outrun both public awareness and the legal frameworks meant to check it.

Missouri is a useful case study because the expansion has been so fast and so quiet — St. Louis, Kansas City, and the suburbs in between are stitching together a regional surveillance net one city council vote at a time, usually with little debate about retention periods, data sharing agreements, or who else gets to query the system. The Fourth Amendment questions Wayman raises aren't hypothetical; courts are still catching up to what it means when every plate on every public road is logged automatically, whether or not anyone is suspected of anything.

If you're in Missouri or anywhere else, check our camera map to see what's already watching your commute, and head to our take-action page if you want to push back at the local level before the network gets any bigger.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of The Wayman Law Group, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.