★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Video: Debate over Flock cameras continues in Bartlesville

FOX23 News Tulsa · 2 years ago

The short version: Bartlesville's City Council is the latest to litigate the same tired trade-off — 'public safety' versus a permanent record of everywhere you drive — and FOX23 shows the fight is far from settled.

Our Take

Credit to FOX23 News Tulsa for putting cameras on the actual debate instead of just the cameras Flock installs. Every time a city council takes up this question, the pitch sounds identical: a handful of stolen-car recoveries, a promise that the data is only used for serious crimes, and a quiet skip over who else gets access, how long the footage sits in a database, and what happens when that database gets subpoenaed, hacked, or quietly shared with agencies outside city limits.

Bartlesville isn't unique — it's a pattern. Small and mid-size cities get the same sales deck, the same 'pilot program' framing, and the same vague promises about oversight that rarely materialize into actual public audits. Once the poles go up, they don't come down, and the network only grows region by region until driving anywhere means being logged somewhere. That's the part these council debates tend to gloss over: this isn't a one-time purchase, it's an ongoing surveillance infrastructure decision.

If you're in or near Bartlesville, don't wait for the vote to find out what's already watching you — check our camera map to see what's already deployed nearby, and if you want to push back before more poles go in, our take-action page has the tools to make your voice heard at the next council meeting.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of FOX23 News Tulsa, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.