★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

WHO FINANCED THE WATCHMAN?| Flock Safety, Founders Fund & Venture Capital | TAJ vs.Technocracy Day 2

taj · 4 weeks ago

The short version: Creator 'taj' traces Flock Safety's venture-capital backing, including Founders Fund, to show how surveillance infrastructure is a profit-driven business, not a neutral public safety tool.

Our Take

Day two of taj's 'TAJ vs. Technocracy' series shifts focus from the cameras on the pole to the capital behind them, and that's exactly the right move. Flock Safety doesn't just sell hardware to police departments — it's a venture-backed company with investors who expect returns, and that means growth, data retention, and expansion are built into its DNA. When Founders Fund and similar firms bankroll a surveillance network, the incentive isn't to minimize data collection, it's to maximize market share and recurring revenue.

This matters because it reframes the whole debate. Flock isn't a passive vendor responding to local demand; it's a growth company pitching itself to city councils, HOAs, and even private subscribers, often with little public debate about retention policies, data sharing, or who gets access to the billions of plate scans piling up. Follow the money and you start to understand why ALPR networks keep spreading into neighborhoods that never had a public conversation about trading privacy for 'safety.'

Credit to taj for digging into the financial plumbing instead of just the tech specs — that's the kind of reporting this fight needs more of. If you want to see how far this network has already spread in your own area, check our camera map, and if you're ready to push back locally, our take-action page has steps for raising this with your city council or HOA.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of taj, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.