Troy, MI, City Council all accepting Flock Camera renewal
The short version: Troy's council rubber-stamped another Flock renewal with barely a public fight, and James Christiani's reporting shows how routine these votes have become.
Our Take
Credit to James Christiani and The Tertiary for sitting through another city council meeting most residents will never watch. That's the real story here: Flock renewals have become so normalized that they sail through on consent agendas or with a handful of softball questions, while the actual surveillance footprint quietly expands year after year. Troy isn't unique — it's the pattern. Once a department has the cameras, canceling becomes politically framed as "going soft on crime," even when there's little public accounting of what the system actually caught versus how many plates of innocent residents got logged and shared.
What's missing from these renewal discussions, almost every time, is a serious conversation about where the data goes after it's collected, who outside the department can query it, and whether the retention and audit policies have changed since the last vote. Cities treat Flock like a subscription service instead of a standing surveillance network — and once it's embedded in the budget, it's treated as infrastructure rather than policy. That's exactly how expansion happens without real debate.
If you're in Troy or anywhere nearby, check our camera map to see what's already watching your streets, and use our take-action page to find out how to push your own council for transparency before the next renewal vote lands on a consent agenda near you.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of The Tertiary with James Christiani, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.