★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

St. Louis County Executive orders review of automated license plate cameras

KSDK News · 1 week ago

The short version: A county executive ordering a 'review' of ALPRs is a good first step, but reviews without teeth or public input are how surveillance programs get rubber-stamped.

Our Take

Credit to KSDK News for covering this, because it's the kind of local accountability story that often gets buried. Sam Page ordering a review of St. Louis County's automated license plate reader program is notable — but we've seen this movie before. "Review" can mean genuine scrutiny, or it can mean a quiet process that ends with the cameras staying put and a press release about "safeguards." The difference usually comes down to whether residents actually get a seat at the table before the decision is made, not after.

What we'll be watching for: who conducts this review, whether Flock Safety or the vendor gets to shape the terms, and whether basic questions get answered publicly. How many cameras are already up? Who can access the data, for how long, and under what oversight? Has the county ever audited misuse, like cops running plates for personal reasons or sharing data with agencies that have no business in St. Louis County? A review that doesn't address those questions isn't accountability — it's cover.

St. Louis County residents don't have to wait for county officials to tell them what's already watching their streets. Check our camera map to see what ALPR infrastructure exists in your area right now, and if you want to push for real transparency rather than a rubber stamp, our take-action page has concrete steps for making your voice heard before this review quietly wraps up.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of KSDK News, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.