Flock says it will require new safeguards for cameras after public backlash
The short version: Flock Safety promises new 'safeguards' after backlash, but a corporate pinky-promise isn't the same as real accountability for a nationwide surveillance network.
Our Take
KCEN News reports that Flock Safety is pledging new safeguards after public backlash over how its automated license plate readers have been used — and misused — across the country. Credit to the KCEN team for putting a local lens on a national story: this is what happens when communities start asking hard questions about who's watching their cars and why.
Here's the thing about corporate self-regulation: it only exists because people pushed back hard enough to make it a PR problem. Flock doesn't answer to voters, and "safeguards" announced in a press response aren't the same as binding policy, independent audits, or real consequences for departments that abuse the data. We've seen this pattern before — public outcry, a vague promise, then business as usual once the news cycle moves on.
The only durable check on this technology is transparency and organized pushback from the communities living under these cameras. If you want to know whether Flock has already set up shop near you, check our camera map, and if you're ready to push your local council for real limits instead of PR statements, our take-action page has the tools to start.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of KCENNews, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.