★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Colorado cities are ditching Flock cameras. But there’s a catch

Courier Colorado · 2 months ago

The short version: Courier Colorado reports some towns are dropping Flock, but leftover contracts, data-sharing deals, and neighboring jurisdictions' cameras mean the surveillance net doesn't just disappear.

Our Take

Courier Colorado's reporting on Moffat County is a useful reminder that 'canceling Flock' is rarely as clean as it sounds. Deputies reportedly got tired of waiting on the company to even retrieve its own hardware — which says a lot about how these vendor relationships are structured in the first place. Local agencies sign up fast, but unwinding the contract, the data-sharing pipeline, and the physical poles themselves is a whole separate fight.

That's the catch worth paying attention to: a city council vote to drop Flock doesn't automatically mean the surveillance stops. Data already collected can live on in shared databases, neighboring counties can keep running their own networks that still capture your plates, and companies aren't always in a hurry to pull equipment once the checks stop coming. Communities that think they've opted out may still be sitting inside someone else's dragnet.

Credit to Courier Colorado for digging into the mechanics instead of just the headline. If you want to see what's actually deployed near you right now — Flock or otherwise — check our camera map, and if your town is debating a contract (or trying to get out of one), our take-action resources can help you ask the right questions before the vote.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Courier Colorado, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.