★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

#135: ShotSpotter

Digitale Anomalien · 2 weeks ago

The short version: A German channel's deep dive into a 2020 Chicago ShotSpotter case shows how acoustic surveillance, like ALPRs, gets sold as safety but reshapes policing and rights.

Our Take

Digitale Anomalien's episode #135 walks through a May 31, 2020 Chicago shooting and the ShotSpotter acoustic sensor network that flagged it, tracing how that single alert fed into a chain of police decisions. It's a German-language channel, but the story is pure American surveillance-industrial complex, and it's worth watching for anyone tracking how "gunshot detection" systems get deployed, trusted, and sometimes misused as evidence in ways the public rarely sees or audits.

ShotSpotter and Flock cameras come from the same playbook: a private vendor sells cities a promise of safety, city councils approve it with minimal public debate, and the system quietly becomes part of the evidentiary record in criminal cases, often without defense attorneys or residents understanding how it actually works. Both technologies also share a troubling pattern of being concentrated in the same over-policed neighborhoods, expanding the surveillance footprint under the banner of crime-fighting while real accountability lags years behind deployment.

Credit to Digitale Anomalien for doing the legwork on a case study that most English-language coverage has glossed over. If you want to see how this same vendor-driven surveillance logic is playing out with license plate readers in your own backyard, check our camera map and find out what you can do about it at take action.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Digitale Anomalien, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.