★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Ring, Reolink, Eufy, Defender — Which Cameras Can You Trust?

Business Reform · 9 months ago

The short version: Business Reform's hands-on comparison of Ring, Reolink, Eufy, and Defender cameras is a useful reminder that convenience surveillance and government-adjacent surveillance are the same fight.

Our Take

Credit to Business Reform for actually paying retail and digging into privacy policies, FTC actions, and lawsuits instead of just unboxing gear. That kind of independent testing is rare, and the conclusion — that even a decade-long favorite brand didn't hold up — is the kind of gut-check consumers need before bolting a camera to their own front door.

Here's why this matters beyond your porch: Ring cameras have a well-documented history of law enforcement data-sharing partnerships, and cloud-connected doorbell footage doesn't just sit in your app, it can end up in police hands with little transparency. That's the same core problem we track with Flock Safety ALPR cameras, except instead of a private company deciding who sees your face, it's a government-adjacent network logging every car that passes a fixed point, often without a warrant. Choosing a doorbell cam that doesn't phone home to a corporate-law-enforcement pipeline is a good first step, but it's a drop in the bucket compared to the automated plate-reading grid quietly going up on public streets.

If a video like this makes you rethink who's watching your house, it should also make you ask who's watching your car. Check our map to see if Flock cameras are already logging your daily commute, and hit take action if you want to push back on your local government's surveillance contracts.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Business Reform, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.