Flock PR Team Responds to Security Flaws & Trespassing #whenweallvote #interview #news #economy
The short version: Epic Muse presses Flock's PR team on camera about security flaws and trespassing complaints, and the canned answers speak for themselves.
Our Take
When a surveillance company's communications team gets cornered on camera, the response is almost always the same: deflect, downplay, and promise an internal review. Credit to Epic Muse for actually putting those questions to Flock Safety's PR representatives directly instead of letting the company control the narrative through press releases alone. Whether the topic is hardware vulnerabilities or cameras planted on private property without consent, getting a company spokesperson on record is more accountability than most local governments ever demand before signing a contract.
The 'trespassing' angle matters more than it might seem. Flock's business model depends on installing cameras fast and often quietly, sometimes on utility poles or private land with murky permission trails. When footage like this surfaces showing PR staff fumbling to explain security flaws or placement disputes, it confirms what we've been saying all along: this is a company optimized for scale and government sales, not for rigorous security review or respecting property boundaries.
If you want to know whether one of these cameras is already watching your street, check our camera map, and if you're ready to push back against an ALPR install in your town, our take-action page has the tools to get started.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Epic Muse, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.