FLOCK CEO: AMERICANS MUST COMPROMISE PRIVACY

Our Take

When the head of the company selling license plate readers to your local police department says, out loud, that Americans need to "compromise" on privacy, that's not a gaffe — it's a sales pitch dressed up as resignation. Credit to OAN and hosts Chip Roy and Tim Burchett for putting that quote on the record. It confirms what we've been saying: Flock isn't asking permission, it's asking for acceptance of a surveillance net that was never put to a public vote in most towns where it now operates.

What's notable here is the bipartisan flavor. A Texas Republican and a Tennessee Republican pushing back on a Fourth Amendment issue is a reminder that ALPR overreach isn't a left-right problem — it's a government-versus-governed problem. Flock cameras don't care about your party registration; they log every plate that passes, law-abiding or not, and build a searchable history of where you've been. That's the kind of power that should make everyone uncomfortable, regardless of who's in the White House.

If a sitting CEO is comfortable telling Congress that privacy is the price of admission, it's worth checking what's already watching your own street. Pull up our camera map to see nearby Flock deployments, and head to our take-action page if you want to push back at the city council level before "compromise" becomes permanent policy.