Some Philadelphia residents raise privacy concerns over Flock cameras
The short version: Philadelphia residents and City Council members are pushing back on Flock Safety ALPRs, echoing a national pattern of surveillance creeping in before anyone votes on it.
Our Take
Credit to WGAL TV for getting Philadelphia residents on camera saying what a lot of people are starting to realize: these license plate readers didn't show up because neighbors asked for them in a public meeting. They showed up because a company sold a police department on "safety" and nobody bothered to loop in the people actually living under the cameras. Now City Council members are playing catch-up, which is exactly backwards from how this is supposed to work.
This is the same script we've seen play out in city after city: quiet procurement, vague promises about solving crime, and then a slow-motion realization that every car entering or leaving a neighborhood is now logged, timestamped, and sitting in a database that can be queried, shared, or breached. Philadelphia isn't unique — it's just the latest city getting a public reminder that "it's for safety" isn't the same as "it's accountable."
If you want to see how deep this network already runs in your own backyard, check our camera map, and if Philadelphia's pushback has you wanting to do more than watch from the sidelines, our take-action page has concrete steps for pressuring your own council members before the cameras go up, not after.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of wgaltv, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.