★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Flock Safety Faces Questions from Chandler City Council

Jen's Two Cents. | Jen & Friends Podcast · 5 months ago

The short version: Chandler's public hearing on renewing its Flock Safety contract shows why these routine votes are actually the best leverage point for pushback.

Our Take

Credit to Jen's Two Cents (Jen & Friends Podcast) for putting a camera on something most residents never see: the moment a city council actually has to answer for a Flock Safety contract instead of just rubber-stamping it. Contract renewal hearings like this one in Chandler are where the rubber meets the road. Once a department has ALPRs installed, the sales pitch is always "public safety," but renewal time is when council members are supposed to ask what the data actually shows, how often plate reads get shared outside the department, and whether any of it prevented the crimes it was sold to stop.

These hearings matter because they're often the only real oversight moment in the entire lifecycle of a surveillance contract. Once approved, systems tend to run for years with minimal public review, expanding quietly through additional cameras, longer retention windows, and wider data-sharing agreements with other agencies. A council asking hard questions in public, on the record, is exactly the kind of friction that keeps this technology from just becoming permanent infrastructure by default.

If you're in Chandler or anywhere else with a Flock system up for renewal, don't wait for the next hearing to find out where the cameras already are. Check our camera map to see what's tracking your area right now, and use our take-action guide to show up before the vote, not after.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Jen's Two Cents. | Jen & Friends Podcast, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.