★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Flock cameras? Yes or no.

WBRC 6 News · 1 month ago

The short version: WBRC 6 News frames Flock cameras as a local 'yes or no' debate, but the real question is who controls the surveillance network once it's built.

Our Take

WBRC 6 News is asking Alabama viewers to weigh in on Flock Safety cameras like it's a simple ballot question: yes or no. But that framing undersells what's actually happening. Once a community says yes, it's not adopting a single camera or a one-time tool — it's plugging into a nationwide license plate database that other agencies, and sometimes private companies, can query without a warrant. The "debate" local news covers is usually just the ribbon-cutting; the real consequences show up months later when nobody's tracking how the data gets used.

Credit to WBRC for at least putting public safety, privacy, and law enforcement in the same sentence — most local coverage of Flock rollouts skips privacy entirely and just quotes the police chief. But "yes or no" also lets city councils off the hook for the harder questions: who audits searches, how long is footage kept, and can residents opt out of being logged every time they drive to church, a clinic, or a protest.

If your town is having this same conversation, don't wait for a news segment to tell you it's already decided. Check our map to see if Flock cameras are already watching your streets, and use our take-action guide to push your local government for real transparency before the next "yes" vote.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of WBRC 6 News, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.