Three Rhode Island Police Chiefs Hold News Conference About Flock Safety Deployment
The short version: Flock's own channel reposts a friendly local news segment of three Rhode Island police chiefs promoting Flock cameras, with zero scrutiny of privacy costs.
Our Take
Notice who's hosting this video: Flock Safety itself. That's not a knock on the Cranston, Pawtucket, and Woonsocket chiefs for wanting a tool they believe helps solve crimes — it's a reminder that this clip, originally aired by WPRI, is being recirculated by the vendor as a marketing asset. When the company selling the surveillance network is also the one curating the press coverage, you should expect a highlight reel, not a hearing.
What's missing from a segment like this is the stuff that actually matters to the public footing the bill: how long plate data is retained, who else can query it, whether it's shared across state lines or with federal agencies, and what happens when the system misreads a plate and sends officers after the wrong car. Three chiefs saying a camera network "will help solve crime" is not the same as an independent audit showing it does — responsibly, with guardrails, and without turning every commute into a logged data point.
Rhode Island residents in these three cities deserve to know if a Flock camera is already watching their street. Check our map to see what's been deployed near you, and if you'd rather your city debate this in public before signing a contract, our take-action page has steps for pushing your council to slow down and ask harder questions.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of Flock, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.