★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Madison Heights debates removal of Flock camera pointed at dispensary

FOX 2 Detroit · 2 months ago

The short version: A Michigan dispensary's public revolt against a Flock camera it never controlled shows how quickly 'public safety' conditions can curdle into unaccountable surveillance infrastructure.

Our Take

Credit to FOX 2 Detroit for digging into a story that cuts right to the rot at the center of so many Flock deployments: a camera gets bolted up as a bureaucratic condition of doing business, nobody can quite say who's actually watching the footage, and the people it's pointed at have zero say in the matter. JARS didn't ask for this camera, didn't have access to it, and only got relief after a public backlash forced the city's hand. That's not oversight — that's surveillance by default, reversed only by viral pressure.

The "No Flock Zone" sign is a clever bit of civil disobedience, but it shouldn't have to come to that. If a business — or a resident — has to publicly shame a city council to get a camera pointed away from them, the approval process was broken from the start. Madison Heights is now negotiating a revised agreement, which is progress, but it also proves these cameras get installed first and questioned later, often as throwaway conditions buried in permitting paperwork that nobody outside city hall ever reads.

This is exactly the kind of quiet mission creep we track at DeFlock. Check our map to see if a Flock camera near you was ever actually debated in public, and hit up our action page if you want to push your own city council before the backlash becomes the only remedy.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of FOX 2 Detroit, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.