★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Inside the Technology: Police Department Talks Flock Cameras

City of San Angelo · 2 months ago

The short version: San Angelo's police department puts out a friendly explainer on Flock cameras, but the city's own PR video skips the hard questions about oversight and data sharing.

Our Take

When a police department produces its own explainer video about the surveillance tech it just deployed, you're not getting journalism — you're getting a press release with a badge on it. The City of San Angelo's video walks viewers through the basics of Flock Safety's ALPR system, and we appreciate the transparency of at least acknowledging the cameras exist. But a department explaining its own tool is never going to dwell on the parts that should worry residents: how long plate data sits in the system, which outside agencies can query it, and what happens when the network misreads a plate and sends officers to the wrong car.

That's the pattern with Flock rollouts nationwide. Cities get a tidy pitch about stolen vehicles and Amber Alerts, and the actual policy details — retention windows, audit logs, interagency data sharing agreements — stay buried in council minutes nobody reads. San Angelo residents deserve the same look under the hood that any surveillance system should get before it blankets a town, not after.

Credit to the City of San Angelo for at least putting a camera on the conversation. If you want the view from outside the department, check our map to see where these readers are actually installed in your area, and visit our take-action page if you want to push your own city council for real answers instead of a promotional video.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of City of San Angelo, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.