★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Newport removes Flock cameras from city as other NKY area considers them

WLWT · 3 months ago

The short version: Newport, Kentucky pulled its Flock cameras while neighboring Northern Kentucky towns weigh adopting them — proof these fights are won and lost city by city.

Our Take

Credit to WLWT for covering a story that too often gets ignored: what happens after a city decides ALPR surveillance isn't worth it. Newport pulling its Flock cameras is a reminder that these systems aren't permanent fixtures once installed — they're policy choices that can be reversed when residents and officials actually scrutinize the costs, the data-sharing risks, and the thin evidence that blanket license plate tracking makes communities safer.

But the bigger story here is the whack-a-mole pattern playing out across Northern Kentucky and basically every metro area in the country. One city pulls back, and the next town over starts the sales pitch all over again, usually with the same vague promises about stolen cars and missing persons, and usually with little public discussion about who else gets access to that data — other police departments, federal agencies, insurance companies. Flock's network effect means your plate can get logged in a town you've never even heard of, and once it's networked, it's out of any single city council's control.

If you're in NKY or anywhere else watching a city debate whether to install these cameras, don't wait for the vote. Check our camera map to see what's already tracking your area, and use our take-action resources to push back before the contract gets signed — it's a lot easier to stop a Flock deployment than to undo one.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of WLWT, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.