★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
Watch · Our Take

Heated debate over Flock cameras

News 8 Now · 3 months ago

The short version: A county board's public clash over Flock cameras shows even local officials are divided on trading privacy for unproven safety promises.

Our Take

News 8 Now's coverage of Trempealeau County's board meeting is a useful reminder that the Flock Safety fight isn't just happening in big cities with ACLU chapters and tech reporters — it's happening in county seats where officials are supposed to represent their neighbors, not a surveillance vendor's sales pitch. When elected officials start shouting at each other over ALPRs, that's a sign the public hasn't actually been looped in on what these systems do, who can access the data, and how long it sits in a database waiting to be subpoenaed, hacked, or misused.

Credit to the News 8 Now team for putting a camera in the room during a debate that a lot of counties would rather keep quiet. These disputes matter because county boards are often the last line of accountability before a Flock contract gets quietly renewed year after year with zero public audit of how the cameras are actually being used — traffic enforcement, warrant checks, or something closer to dragnet tracking of everyone who drives through town.

If you're in Wisconsin or anywhere else wondering whether your local roads are already wired up, check our camera map to see what's been documented near you, and if your county hasn't had this conversation yet, our take-action guide walks through how to get it on the agenda before the contract is already signed.

This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of News 8 Now, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.