I-Team Investigates: Two Alabama cases prompt questions about Flock cameras
The short version: An Alabama I-Team report on two troubling Flock camera cases shows why 'trust us' isn't good enough oversight for license plate surveillance.
Our Take
Credit to ABC 33/40's I-Team for digging into two Alabama cases that raise hard questions about how Flock Safety cameras get used once they're bolted to a pole. We've said it before: the marketing pitch is always about solving crimes, but the real-world record is messy, inconsistent, and often short on accountability when something goes wrong. When local reporters start asking pointed questions, it's usually because the public records and official answers didn't add up.
This is the pattern we track constantly — cameras get approved with vague policies, data gets shared across jurisdictions nobody voted on, and when a case goes sideways, there's no clear line of responsibility. Two cases is never just two cases. It's a signal of how a system without real guardrails behaves at scale, across thousands of similar deployments nationwide.
If you're in Alabama or anywhere else wondering whether your town has quietly joined this network, check our map to see what's nearby. And if your city council hasn't had a public debate about this, that's exactly the gap our action resources are built to help you close.
This is DeFlock The USA’s original commentary. The video above is the work of ABC 33/40, published on YouTube — full credit to the creator.