I-Team: Flock warns CT police about a security breach, but records reveal the company knew about...

Our Take

Here's the pattern that should worry every city council member currently rubber-stamping a Flock contract: a company that insists its surveillance network is locked down tight, quietly managing a breach timeline that doesn't match what it's telling the police departments paying for the service. WFSB's I-Team deserves credit for pulling the records and making Flock's own paper trail do the talking instead of just taking a press statement at face value.

This isn't a one-off IT hiccup. Flock's entire pitch to police departments rests on the promise that this massive, searchable archive of where your car has been is handled responsibly and securely. When the company that controls a nationwide database of driving patterns knows about a security problem before it tells the agencies using the system, that's not a technical footnote — that's a trust failure baked into the business model. Every plate scanned, every drive logged, every pattern-of-life profile sitting in that database is only as safe as Flock's incentive to disclose bad news quickly, and incentives like that have a way of bending toward PR timing rather than public safety.

Connecticut residents deserve to know whether their local PD was told the full story, and when. If you want to see whether these cameras are already watching your commute, check our camera map, and if your town is debating a Flock contract, our take-action resources can help you ask the right questions before the vote, not after the breach.