On the agenda: Bothell meeting — automated license plate (Mar 17)

AGENDA
City Council Meeting
6:00 PM - Tuesday, March 17, 2026
CITY HALL 18415 101st AVE NE BOTHELL, WA 98011
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Mason Thompson
Deputy Mayor Jenne Alderks
Councilmember Prasad Anguluri
Councilmember Carston Curd
Councilmember Brittany Miles
Councilmember Amanda Dodd
Councilmember Rami Al-Kabra

To join the meeting, use one of the following:
 Attend in-person (Council Chambers)
 Watch live via Zoom, the City of Bothell YouTube Channel or BCTV Cable Access
Channels 21/26
 Zoom: click this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87356186684 (or copy the URL and
paste into a web browser)
 Call-in and listen to the live meeting 253-215-8782 and enter 873 5618 6684#
Comments will be accommodated both in-person and through Zoom during the Public
Comment and Public Hearing portions of the meeting, by submitting a form HERE. Forms must
be submitted no later than 3:00 PM the day of the meeting.
Presentations for this meeting will be made available no later than 4:00 PM the day before the
meeting. They can be viewed online HERE.
Page
Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance & Roll Call
1.

Meeting Agenda Approval
During this item, the City Council may identify agenda items to be continued, withdrawn, or added.

2.

Public Engagement Opportunities

3.

Proclamations

4.

a.

Transgender Day of Visibility
Proclamation

5

b.

Washington's First Teen-Led Mental Health Summit
Proclamation

6

Public Comment
During this item, the Mayor will invite public comment. Those testifying or providing public
comment will be limited to three (3) minutes. Submit your request to speak or provide written
comment HERE. Forms must be submitted no later than 3:00 PM the day of the meeting.

Page 1 of 76

5.

6.

Reports
5.a.

City Manager Report

5.b.

Council Committee Reports, Community Reports & Conversations

Projected Agenda Discussion
During this item, the City Council may identify future agenda items.

7.

Consent Agenda
All items under this section will be passed with a single motion and vote. These items are of a
routine nature. Prior to approval, City Council may request items be withdrawn from the consent
agenda for separate discussion. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the City Manager to
implement each item in accordance with the staff recommendation.

a.

Approval of Minutes from March 10, 2026
City Council - Mar 10 2026 - Minutes - Pdf

7 - 10

Recommended Action: Approve the March 10, 2026 minutes as
presented.
b.

Resolution Approving Acquisition Documents for the Bothell Way
Multimodal Improvements Project
AB # 26-038 BWMM ROW Acquisition
Att-1 Resolution
Att-2 Excerpt from Right-of-Way Plans
Att-3 Vicinity Map

11 - 20

Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City
Manager to execute all necessary acquisition documents for the
purchase of right-of-way and easements associated with Parcel #
2705310030-7500.
c.

Professional Services Amendment with Berger Partnership for 1st
Lieutenant Nicholas Madrazo Memorial Park

21 - 30

AB # 26-039 Professional Services Amendment for Madrazo Park
Att-1 Resolution
Recommended Action: Approve resolution authorizing the City
Manager to sign a professional services amendment with Berger
Partnership for design of 1st Lieutenant Nicholas Madrazo Park.

Page 2 of 76

d.

Personnel Policy Section 3.6 - No Rehire or Third-Party Engagement
AB # 26-040 Personnel Policy Section 3.6
Att-1 Resolution

31 - 38

Recommended Action: Approve a resolution adopting Personnel
Policy Section 3.6 - No Rehire or Third‑Party Engagement.
8.

Ordinances & Resolutions
a.

Sound Cities Association Membership
AB # 26-041 SCA Membership
Att-1 Resolution

39 - 42

Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff regarding Sound
Cities Association (SCA) membership and approve a resolution to
terminate membership if desired.
9.

Other
a.

2026 Council Subcommittee Recommendations for Board &
Commission Interviews
AB # 26-042 B&C Recommendations

43 - 44

Recommended Action: Approve the subcommittee recommendations
for Board & Commission interviews on March 24, 2026.
10.

Study Sessions
a.

Body Worn Camera Project
AB # 26-043 Body Worn Camera Project
Att-1 Technology Surveillance and Intelligence Policy
Att-2 Model Act Regulating Use of BWC

45 - 64

Recommended Action: Provide staff with guidance on the highest
priority policy and program questions to explore, as well as the target
audiences for community outreach, in the next phases of work.

Page 3 of 76

b.

Immigrant Safety and Support
AB # 26-044 Immigrant Safety and Support
Att-1 Immigrant Support and Safety Policy Matrix

65 - 76

Recommended Action: No action is requested. Staff are providing an
update and seeking Council feedback. Key questions staff are
seeking feedback on:
• Does Council support moving forward with the imminent measures
outlined below to better support community preparedness?
• Are there any measures or actions we did not discuss tonight, either
imminent or undergoing study, that we should add to the matrix for
evaluation?

11.

Adjourn
Certificate:
I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on Mar 12 2026 04:00:54 PM, on the official
website and bulletin board at Bothell City Hall, 18415 101st Avenue NE, Bothell, WA, 98011, in
accordance with RCW 42.30.077, at least 24 hours in advance of the published start time of the
meeting.
Laura Hathaway, City Clerk
Special Accommodations:
The City of Bothell strives to provide accessible meetings for people with disabilities. If special
accommodations are required, please contact the ADA Coordinator at (425) 806-6200 at least
one day prior to the meeting.
Watch Meetings:
Bothell City Council meetings are aired live on Bothell Community Television (BCTV) Channel
21/26 (Comcast/Verizon) (available to Comcast and Verizon Cable customers within Bothell City
limits). Meetings are generally replayed according to the following schedule (subject to change):
Wednesday following the meeting at 10 a.m.; Friday, Saturday and Sunday following the meeting
at 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. City Council and Planning Commission meetings and the BCTV schedule
are viewable online at www.bothellwa.gov

Page 4 of 76

PROCLAMATION
Transgender Day of Visibility
WHEREAS, Transgender Day of Visibility is observed annually on March 31 to celebrate the lives
and contributions of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming people while raising
awareness of the discrimination, challenges, and violence the transgender community continues
to face; and
WHEREAS, all transgender people have inherent worth and are deserving of respect and dignity,
from well-known historical and public figures to those for whom it is not safe to live their
authentic lives; and
WHEREAS, the lives and human rights of transgender people are under attack, with multiple
legislative attempts to restrict the rights of transgender people, agency websites erasing
references to historical contributions of transgender people, and numerous anti-trans bills passed
and pending across the country that seek to define trans people out of existence, cancel identity
documents, and restrict access to public space; and
WHEREAS, celebrating transgender lives, recognizing the accomplishments of transgender
people, and fostering transgender joy are critical to countering the attacks, ensuring that each
and every transgender person in the Bothell community knows that they are seen, valued, and
welcomed here.
NOW THEREFORE, I, Mason Thompson, Mayor of the City of Bothell, do hereby proclaim March
31, 2026 as “Transgender Day of Visibility” in the City of Bothell and encourage all Bothell
community members to uplift their transgender family, friends, and neighbors, focusing on their
strength, resilience, and accomplishments through the adversity they face, and to actively work
toward building a community where transgender people can live openly, safely, and with full and
equal access to opportunity and belonging.
Signed this 17th day of March 2026.
_______________________________
Mason Thompson, Mayor

Page 5 of 76

PROCLAMATION
Washington’s First Teen-Led Mental Health Summit
WHEREAS, mental health is a critical component of overall well-being, and youth across Washington State
face increasing challenges related to stress, anxiety, depression, and access to timely and culturally
responsive mental health support; and
WHEREAS, nationally recognized mental health data demonstrate that more than one in seven youth ages
6–17 experience a mental health disorder each year, with half of all lifetime mental illness beginning by
age 14 and three-quarters by age 24, while suicide remains the second leading cause of death among
individuals ages 10–24; and
WHEREAS, schools increasingly serve as frontline support systems for student mental health, yet only 56
percent report having the capacity to effectively meet the mental health needs of all students,
demonstrating a significant gap in access to care; and
WHEREAS, Washington’s First Teen-Led Mental Health Summit highlights the importance of ensuring that
youth are not only included in mental health discussions, but are actively engaged in shaping solutions
that support student well-being in schools and communities; and
WHEREAS, the summit convenes students, educators, healthcare professionals, policymakers, nonprofit
leaders, and community advocates to foster intergenerational collaboration and elevate youth voices
through education, storytelling, and interactive learning; and
WHEREAS, this event represents the first statewide, youth-led mental health summit of its kind in
Washington, underscoring the growing role of young people as leaders, advocates, and changemakers in
advancing mental health awareness and community well-being.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mason Thompson, Mayor of the City of Bothell, do hereby proclaim March 21, 2026
as Washington’s First Teen-Led Mental Health Summit, and encourage all residents to recognize the
importance of youth mental well-being, reduce stigma surrounding mental health, and take meaningful
action to support young people in our schools and communities.
Signed this 17th day of March 2026
____________________________
Mason Thompson, Mayor

Page 6 of 76

Draft

MINUTES
City Council
Tuesday, March 10, 2026 @ 6:00 PM
CITY HALL 18415 101st AVE NE BOTHELL, WA 98011

Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance & Roll Call
Mayor Thompson called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.

1.

Present:

Councilmember Anguluri, Mayor Thompson, Deputy Mayor Alderks,
Councilmember Curd, Councilmember Miles, and Councilmember Al-Kabra

Absent:

Councilmember Dodd

Meeting Agenda Approval
There were no changes to the Meeting Agenda.

2.

Public Engagement Opportunities
Mayor Thompson reviewed upcoming public engagement opportunities.

3.

Proclamations
a.

American Red Cross Month
Mayor Thompson read the proclamation and presented it to Board member Sheri
Blumenthal who highlighted the services provided by the Red Cross and thanked
Council for their recognition.

b.

Youth Art Month
Mayor Thompson read the proclamation and presented it to Faustine Wilkey with
Northshore Visual Art Partners who shared the importance of advocating for art
teachers and ways the community can become involved.

Page71ofof76
4
Page

Draft

City Council - Mar 10 2026
4.

Public Comment
Ray Thomas - provided written comment and spoke on the Landmark Preservation Code
updates and Landmark Preservation Board impacts.
A.

5.

Public Comment - Ray Thomas

Reports
5.a.

City Manager Report
City Manager Kyle Stannert reported on the Juanita Metro Flex service area's pilot
program and the program's continuation with newly proposed regions.
5.a.1

City Transportation Safety Plan and Implementation
City Manager Stannert introduced Transportation Operation Engineer Kam
Szabo who, joined by Supervising Transportation Engineer Raid Tirhi, provided
an overview of the programs and next steps of the Plan and entertained Council
questions.

5.b.

Council Committee Reports, Community Reports & Conversations
Deputy Mayor Alderks reported on the Community Safety Subcommittee meeting
where community concerns around immigration and enforcement in Bothell were
discussed.
Councilmember Anguluri shared details of the upcoming LTAC meeting and the
Committee's goals.

6.

Projected Agenda Discussion
None.

7.

Consent Agenda
a.

Approval of Minutes from March 3, 2026
Recommended Action: Approve the March 3, 2026 minutes as presented.

b.

Resolution Declining Further Independent Consideration of the Everest LLC Private
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request and Including as Part of the Canyon Park
Subarea Plan Update
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution declining further independent consideration
on the Everest LLC Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation amendment and
directing staff to include the consideration within the Canyon Park Subarea Plan
update.

c.

Purchase of Asphalt Paving Machine from Pape Machinery, Inc.

Page82ofof76
4
Page

Draft

City Council - Mar 10 2026
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute
contract documents to purchase an Asphalt Paving Machine from Pape Machinery, Inc.
in the amount of $389,866.13 including estimated shipping and sales tax, for a total
amount not to exceed $400,000.
MOTION: Deputy Mayor Alderks moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Councilmember Curd seconded. The motion carried 6-0-1 (absent: Councilmember
Dodd).
Council recessed at 7:01 PM and reconvened at 7:25 PM.
8.

Ordinances & Resolutions
a.

Bothell Municipal Code Title 17 Amendments Including Transportation Impact Fees
Utilities and Development Services Manager Boyd Benson provided a summary on the
Code amendments' key information and entertained Council questions.
MOTION: Councilmember Curd moved to approve an ordinance adopting amendments
to Bothell Municipal Code Title 17 including the updated Transportation Impact Fees.
Deputy Mayor Alderks seconded. The motion carried 6-0-1 (absent: Councilmember
Dodd).

9.

Study Sessions
a.

Bothell Municipal Code Title 22 - Landmark Preservation Code Update
Planner Jaclyn Samson and Deputy Community Development Director Christian Geitz
presented the main themes and purpose of the Code updates requesting Council input
on scope and level of regulatory flexibility as well as the role of the Landmark
Preservation Board. Discussion ensued. Council emphasized including the Landmark
Preservation Board in discussions and reviewing the needs and duties of the Board.

b.

Bothell Fire Administration Services
City Manager Stannert, joined by Deanna Gregory of Pacifica Law Group and Bothell
and Shoreline Fire Chief Matt Cowan, presented the item requesting Council direction
on the next steps for providing Fire administration services. Discussion ensued.
Council expressed priority in maintaining a governance role and requested analysis of
remaining a standalone Fire department versus joining an RFA. Staff will bring the
financial and service level impacts of both scenarios as well as options for creating a
new RFA with Kirkland back for discussion.

10.

Adjourn
Mayor Thompson adjourned the meeting at 10:13 PM.

Page93ofof76
4
Page

PUBLIC COMMENT FORM
PC-26012

Meeting:
Submitted by:
Address:
I would like to:

March 10, 2026
Ray Thomas
24227 26 th Avenue SE
Submit written comment (not requesting to speak)

AGENDA BILL or SUBJECT:
Agenda item 9a LPB code update
COMMENT OR QUESTION:
I encourage the Council expand the focus of the BLP code update. Board members have not been
consulted and have offered code changes in the past which have been ignored. t This Board suffers
from lack of funding to carry out its full charge. Its structure and function have been usurped by
insufficient staffing and lack of adherence to democratic and inclusive standards. Board attrition is
high because there is inadequate funding to support growth of leadership for the Board and the city. If
the Council limits the scope of this update, I shall resign effective immediately. Board member
Position 1.

Page
4
Page
104ofof76

Agenda Bill
AB # 26-038

TO:

Mayor Thompson and Members of the City Council

FROM:

Erin Leonhart, Public Works Director
Robert McCadden, Capital Project Engineer (Presenter)

DATE:

March 17, 2026

SUBJECT:

Resolution Approving Acquisition Documents for the Bothell Way Multimodal
Improvements Project

COUNCIL ACTION:
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary acquisition documents
for the purchase of right-of-way and easements associated with Parcel # 2705310030-7500.
HISTORY:
Date Action
Staff conducted a study session to provide Council with an update on
November 12, 2024 the Phase I Bothell Way NE Multimodal Improvements Project rightof-way process
December 3, 2024

City Council adopted the 2025-2031 Capital Facilities Plan and the
2025-2026 Budget

Council authorized an ordinance allowing the acquisition, by eminent
September 16, 2025 domain, if necessary, of property required for the Bothell Way NE
Multimodal Improvements Project
Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
December 16, 2025 execute acquisition documents related to six parcels for the Bothell
Way NE Multimodal Improvements Project
Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
January 20, 2026 execute acquisition documents related to six parcels for the Bothell
Way NE Multimodal Improvements Project

Page 11 of 76

Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
February 17, 2026 execute acquisition documents related to three parcels for the Bothell
Way NE Multimodal Improvements Project
DISCUSSION:
Project Background
The Bothell Way NE Multimodal Improvements Project is designed to enhance mobility and
safety along the Bothell Way NE corridor by providing improvements for pedestrians, cyclists,
transit riders, and motorists. The project extends from Reder Way to 240th Street SE and
includes significant upgrades to improve the overall functionality and safety of the area.
Right of Way Needs
To construct the project, the existing right-of-way must be widened, requiring the acquisition of
additional property. The acquisitions include right-of-way, as well as slope, utility, and
temporary construction easements in the vicinity of the project. Throughout the design
process, the city has worked to minimize right-of-way needs and reduce impacts on private
property while still meeting the project's goals. Approval of this resolution will authorize staff to
close the purchase transactions with the identified property owners for the right-of-way and
easements necessary to construct the Bothell Way NE Multimodal Improvements Project. This
is the fourth package of acquisition documents associated with this project. The parcel within
this package is shown in a red cloud on Attachment 2.
Property Owner Outreach and Communication
City staff and right-of-way consultants have been in contact with affected property owners
throughout the right-of-way acquisition process and have met with property owners
individually a minimum of six times each to negotiate the offer presented in this Agenda Bill.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Per RCWs 35A.13.230; 35A.11.010; 35A.11.020, the City Council has authority over all
purchases and sales of real property interests.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The item is included in the adopted 2025-2031 Capital Facilities Plan and is also part of the
adopted 2025-2026 Budget. The combination of city funds and secured grants is sufficient to
fund the purchase of the necessary right-of-way and other property interests.

Page 12 of 76

ATTACHMENTS:
Att-1 Resolution
Att-2 Excerpt from Right-of-Way Plans
Att-3 Vicinity Map
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary acquisition documents
for the purchase of right-of-way and easements associated with Parcel # 2705310030-7500.

Page 13 of 76

RESOLUTION NO.

(2026)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION DOCUMENTS FOR THE BOTHELL WAY
NE MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

WHEREAS, in September of 2025 City Council approved a right of way plan and
Ordinance No. 2464 for the acquisition of right of way for the Bothell Way Multimodal
Improvement Project (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Project is designed to enhance both mobility and safety along the
Bothell Way NE corridor, focusing on multiple modes of transportation including
pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, and motorists; and
WHEREAS, the City is in the process of negotiations to purchase all necessary
property rights for the Project from owners; and
WHEREAS, having completed negotiations for property rights on the following tax
parcels, the City desires to acquire right of way and temporary and permanent
easements on the following parcels, for the following amounts:
Parcel #
2705310030-7500

Amount
$11,206.00

WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City Manager to sign closing documents for
the acquisition of the aforementioned right of way and temporary and permanent
easements for the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Authorizing City Manager to Execute Acquisition Documents. The City
Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the acquisition documents for
Parcel No. 2705310030-7500 associated with acquisition of right of way, temporary
construction easement and drainage easement as substantially described in Exhibit A.
Section 2. Corrections The City Clerk is authorized to make necessary corrections
to this resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors,
references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any references
thereto.

Page 14 of 76

PASSED this ___________ day of ______________________2026.
APPROVED:

MASON THOMPSON
MAYOR
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:

LAURA HATHAWAY
CITY CLERK

FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:
(2026)

Page 15 of 76

Exhibit A
REAL PROPERTY VOUCHER
AGENCY NAME

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the items and
amounts listed herein are proper charges against the
Agency, that the same or any part thereof has not been
paid, and that I am authorized to sign for the claimant.

City of Bothell
18415 101st Ave NE
Bothell, WA 98011
GRANTOR OR CLAIMANT (NAME, ADDRESS)

TIN/SSN:

McGee Professional Building LLC
21419 47th Ave SE
Bothell WA, 98021-7952

NAME AND SIGNATURE FOR EACH CLAIMANT

DATED

01/29/2026

X

PROJECT NO. AND TITLE

DATED

Bothell Way NE Multimodal Improvements
FEDERAL AID NO.

PARCEL NO.

STPUL-RAISE-HLP-9999(845)

2705310030-7500

In full, complete and final payment and settlement for the title or interest conveyed or
released, as fully set forth in:

X
$ AMOUNT

DATED

LAND:

656 SF
952 SF

Temporary Construction Easement
Drainage Easement

+
+

IMPROVEMENTS:

$9,207
$1,999

+

DAMAGES:

+

Cost to Cure
Proximity
Other

+
+

SPECIAL BENEFITS:

=

JUST COMPENSATION (JC) AMOUNT:

$11,206

REMAINDER:

+

Uneconomic Remnant
Excess Acquisition

+

DEDUCTIONS:

Amount Previously Paid
Performance Bond
Salvage Amount
Pre-Paid Rent
Other

-

ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT:

+

STATUTORY EVALUATION ALLOWANCE:

+

ESCROW FEE:

+

REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX:

+

-

OTHER:

+
ACQUISITION AGENT:

DATE

Tracie Balado
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR AGENCY:

VOUCHER NO.

TOTAL AMOUNT PAID

$11,206
DATE

Steve Morikawa

LPA-321 10/2014

Page 16 of 76
Document ID: e1f6f09f-826d-4a49-9ae3-102d0ed2f94f

CITY OF BOTHELL

PEND
OREILLE

WHATCOM
OKANOGAN

SKAGIT

ISLAND

STEVENS

SNOHOMISH

CLALLAM

EVERETT

BOTHELL WAY NE MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS

CHELAN

JEFFERSON

SEATTLE

P

RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS

DOUGLAS

GRAYS
HARBOR

LINCOLN
SPOKANE

KING

MASON

GRANT
KITTITAS

OLYMPIA

PIERCE

THURSTON
PACIFIC

LEWIS

FRANKLIN

COLUMBIA

SKAMANIA

MERIDIAN AVE S

45TH AVE SE

35TH AVE SE

88TH AVE NE

80TH AVE NE

68TH AVE NE

SE 1 4
SEC 31

ST

120TH AVE NE

104TH AVE NE

NE 195TH ST

NE 190TH ST

VD

LE

PROJECT
LOCATION

B

S
RD
A
E

L
EB

NE 180TH ST
522
522

NE 170TH ST

SAMMAMISH RIVER

E

SECTION LINE

SID

SQUAWK
SLOUGH

EAST

ER

SEC. 31, T. 27 N., R. 5 E., W.M.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY

92ND

KING COUNTY
SEC. 6, T. 26 N., R. 5 E., W.M.

100TH AVE NE

LOCUST WAY

NE 1

RIV

NE 190TH ST

NE

NE 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 6

L WAY

BO

HEL

BOT

SECTION LINE

240TH ST SE

NE

NE 1 4
SEC 6

NE 203RD ST

AVE

NE 188TH ST

240TH ST SE

D
73R

IR

228TH ST SE

405

EW

REDER WAY

H AV
14T

Y NE
A
W
L
THEL

4 SECTION LINE

16 SECTION LINE

5TH C

SE 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 6

228TH ST SE

240TH ST SE

E

1

NE 19

LLE
H
T

WY
H
ETT
R
E
EV

PL

NW 1 4 NE 1 4
SEC 6

SW 1 4 NE 1 4
SEC 6

16 SECTION LINE

PROJECT LOCATION

03RD
NE 2

1

NE 201ST PL

NW 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 6

ASOTIN

TOWNSHIP 27 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.

1

H ST

Page 17 of 76

Last Saved by: USJR675504 on: Jun 18, 2025 12:15 PM

ST S

BO

NE 196T

File: C:\Users\USJR675504\WSP O365\Civil-FederalWay - Projects\30901188\000\CADD\Dwgs-ROW\50_RW01.dwg

ND

4 SECTION LINE

SW 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 6

WALLA WALLA

KLICKITAT

CLARK

SW 1 4
SEC 31

242

1

BENTON

AREA MAP

NW 1 4
SEC 6

SW 1 4
SEC 6

GARFIELD

YAKIMA

COWLITZ

TOWNSHIP 27 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.

WHITMAN

ADAMS

WAHKIAKUM

TOWNSHIP 26 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.

FERRY

KITSA

Copyright © WSP USA Inc. All Rights Reserved.

BELLINGHAM

SAN
JUAN

DR

405

TOWNSHIP 26 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.

SITE PLAN

VICINITY MAP

WSP USA Inc.
1201 PACIFIC AVE
Suite 550
TACOMA WA 98402-4301
TEL: (206) 431-2300
FAX: (206) 431-2250

JCR

CITY OF BOTHELL

RW-1

JCR

BOTHELL WAY NE MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS

30901188

RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN
COVER SHEET

11/7/25

RAF
RAF

1 OF 19

Copyright © WSP USA Inc. All Rights Reserved.

SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 26 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.
SE 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 6

NW 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 6

0
1
W

R
T
E
HE

S

SHEET R
W-11

SHEET R
W-7

SHEET RW-6

W-5

T
S
T
S
1

NE 196TH

18
8T
H
NE

RW
-19
EET
SH

SHEET
R

N

9
1
E

16 SECTION LINE

CONTINUED BELOW

1

SW 1 4 NE 1 4
SEC 6

4 SECTION LINE

ST

16 SECTION LINE

ST

1

1

SHEE
T RW

T
E
E
SH

-8

ST

Y NE

1

16 SECTION LINE

NE

R

CI

19
0

H
5T

TH

L WA

19

HEL

NE

BOT

-9
W
R

NE 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 6

SW 1 4 NE 1 4
SEC 6

SE 1 4 NE 1 4
SEC 6

SECTION LINE

SHEET RW-12

SHEET

SHEET
RW-19

RW-1

3

FROM

BOT
HELL

NE

-14

ST
SE
TH

8
1
W
R
T
E
E
SH

17
W
R
T
E
E
H
S

6
1
W
R
T
E
E
SH

SHEET RW-15

16 SECTION LINE

240

1

Y

HW
T
T
E
R
E
L-EV
L
E
H
T
O
B

16 SECTION LINE

NW 1
1

E 4
1
SW 4 N6
SEC

4

NE 1

SEC 6

4

NE 203RD PL

1

NE 2
01ST

PL

E

ABOV

WAY

SHEET RW

SE 1 4 SW 1 4
SEC 31

T SE
242ND S

SECTION LINE

. 6, KING CO
T. 2
SEC
6 N. UNTY
. 31
, R.
, T. 2
5 E.
SNO
7
, W.
N
HOM ., R.
M.
ISH 5 E.,
COU W.M
NTY
.

4 SECTION LINE

SEC

NE 1 4 NW 1 4
SEC 6

1

SHEET RW-11

Page 18 of 76

Last Saved by: USJR675504 on: Jun 18, 2025 12:18 PM

SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.

SW 1 4 NE 1 4
SEC 6

INUED
CONT

File: C:\Users\USJR675504\WSP O365\Civil-FederalWay - Projects\30901188\000\CADD\Dwgs-ROW\50_RW04.dwg

SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 26 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.

1

4 SECTION LINE

NE 1 4 SW 1 4
SEC 31

SW 1 4 SE 1 4
SEC 31

120

0

scale

WSP USA Inc.
1201 PACIFIC AVE
Suite 550
TACOMA WA 98402-4301
TEL: (206) 431-2300
FAX: (206) 431-2250

120

240
feet

JCR

CITY OF BOTHELL

RW-4

JCR

BOTHELL WAY NE MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS

30901188

RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN
KEY PLAN

11/7/25

RAF
RAF

4 OF 19

Page 19 of 76

PROJECT AREA MAP
524

240th St SE

23rd Ave SE

Brier

527
19th Ave SE

Meridian Ave S

228th St SE

ay N

100th Ave NE

ell W

68th Ave NE

88th Ave NE

E

104th Ave NE

Both

Kenmore

North
Creek
Trail
75th Ave SE

Bothell

405

NE Woodinville-Duvall Rd

od
d

23rd Ave SE

dR

19th Ave SE

on

15th Ave SE

edm

NE 145th St

7th Ave SE

NE

240th St SE

e-R

Rd

Phase 2

ill

ds

inv

on

124th AAve NE

Woodinville
n e
Wo

Sim

100th
0 Ave NE

522

North
No
orth
o
Creek
Cre
eek
e
Business
Busine
ness
ne
Park
k

BurkeGilman
Trail

522

Maltby

45th Ave SE

Canyon Park
Regional Growth
Center

9

Snohomish County
King County

104th Ave NE

NE 200th St

NE 195th St

E

Doug Allen
Sportsfields

N
ay
lW
Bothel

Westhill
Elementary
School

88th Ave NE

NE 192nd St

Construction will happen in
three phases, beginning Winter
2027 and ending Winter 2031.

1st Pl NE
10

NE 191st S
t
92nd Ave NE

Bothell Way NE runs through
downtown Bothell and
connects State Route 522 and
Interstate 405 in Canyon Park,
crossing both Snohomish and
King Counties.

100th Ave NE

Phase 3

NE 203rd St

NE 188th St
Pop Keeney
Stadium

Phase 1

NE 190th St

Reder Wy
NE 186th St
NE 185th St

Bothell High
School

NE 180th St

Bothell
Landing Park

522

Page 20 of 76

Agenda Bill
AB # 26-039

TO:

Mayor Thompson and Members of the City Council

FROM:

Nik Stroup, Parks and Recreation Director
Aaron Milner, Parks Planning and Development Manager

DATE:

March 17, 2026

SUBJECT:

Professional Services Amendment with Berger Partnership for 1st Lieutenant
Nicholas Madrazo Memorial Park

COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign a professional services amendment
with Berger Partnership for design of 1st Lieutenant Nicholas Madrazo Memorial Park.
HISTORY:
Date Action
City enters into Memorandum of Agreement with King County
May 7, 2001 addressing impacts from the construction of the North Creek Storage
Facility, located in the North Creek Business Park
June 15, 2010

Council approves Resolution 1259, naming of the park to 1st
Lieutenant Nicholas A. Madrazo, USMC Memorial Park

July 9, 2013 Council authorizes adoption of Master Plan
February 17, 2015

Council authorizes the City Manager to enter into a professional
services agreement with Berger Partnership for design of the park

May 31, 2017 Phase 1 construction goes to bid resulting in no responsive bidders
June 13, 2023

Council authorizes the City Manager to enter into a professional
services amendment to refine design and include Phase 2 designs

Page 21 of 76

DISCUSSION:
This project is associated with a City of Bothell and King County Agreement to develop a
community park on top of a wastewater storage tank at the King County
Metro Wastewater North Creek Storage Facility. The site is located within the North
Creek Business Park at 18707 North Creek Parkway. The future park was named in honor of 1st
Lieutenant Nicholas A. Madrazo, USMC, who grew up in the Westhill neighborhood of Bothell
and is the city’s first known casualty of the war in Afghanistan.
Previous design of Phase 1 improvements went to bid for construction in 2017, resulting in no
responsive bidders. In June 2023, Council approved a professional services amendment to
refine Phase 1 designs and develop design of Phase 2 improvements. This amendment will
allow additional scope for stormwater system anti-floatation design and additional permit
review services.
In its entirety, the project will construct a new park with walking paths, informal play field,
parking lot, restroom, picnic shelter, lighted basketball court, six lighted pickleball courts, and
a veteran’s memorial.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Procurement policy section 6.2 requires contract amendments to professional services
agreements be approved by Council if additional cost increases the total amount payable by
more the $100,000 the previously approved amount.
FISCAL IMPACT:
1st Lieutenant Nicholas Madrazo Memorial Park is included in the 2025-2031 Capital Facilities
Plan and is budgeted for.
ATTACHMENTS:
Att-1 Resolution
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign a professional services amendment
with Berger Partnership for design of 1st Lieutenant Nicholas Madrazo Park.

Page 22 of 76

RESOLUTION NO.________(2026)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO AGREEMENT WITH BERGER PARTNERSHIP
FOR DESIGN OF 1ST LIEUTENANT NICHOLAS MADRAZO PARK
WHEREAS, the City of Bothell aims to enhance the quality of life and provide
recreation for all within our community regardless of age or ability; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bothell has entered into Memorandum of Agreement with
King County for the construction of a park at the King County Metro Wastewater North
Creek Storage Facility; and
WHEREAS, the Bothell City Council approved funding for the design and
construction of 1st Lieutenant Nicholas Madrazo Park in the 2025-2031 Capital Facilities
Pan on December 3, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment
No. 13 to the City’s contract with Berger Partnership for professional services relating to
design of 1st Lieutenant Nicholas Madrazo Park in substantially the same form as shown
in Exhibit A.
Section 2. The City Clerk is authorized to make necessary corrections to this
resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors,
references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any references
thereto.
PASSED this ___________ day of ______________________2026
APPROVED:

MASON THOMPSON
MAYOR

Page 23 of 76

ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:

LAURA HATHAWAY
CITY CLERK

FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:________(2026)

Page 24 of 76

AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Contract No. 1009 (15-118-13)
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES (“Amendment”) amends the Agreement for Professional Services (“Agreement”)
entered into on December 30, 2025, by the City of Bothell, a Washington State municipal
corporation, (“City”), and Berger Partnership, a Washington State), (“Consultant”).
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant entered into the Agreement to provide additional work
in connection with 1st Lt. Madrazo U.S.M.C. Memorial Park ; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to increase the services provided under the Agreement, and [to
amend the maximum amount payable under the Agreement].
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
1.

Subsection 3(A) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
A.
The City shall pay the Consultant hourly, plus actual expenses, in accordance with
Attachment B, but not more than a total of $397,880 $434,620 for all services rendered
under this Agreement.

2.
Attachment B, Scope of Services, to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the
additional tasks, hourly rates, and/or clarifications set forth and described on Exhibit A to this
Amendment.
3.
Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions to the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.

Page 1 of 3

Last Legal Update: June 2, 2022
Page 25 of 76

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of
the later of the signature dates included below.
CONSULTANT

CITY OF BOTHELL

Date:

Date:

By:

By:

Name: Andy Mitton

Kyle Stannert, City Manager

Title: Principal
Tax I.D. #:
UBI #:

Page 2 of 3

Last Legal Update: June 2, 2022
Page 26 of 76

Exhibit A
Additions to Scope of Services

Page 3 of 3

Last Legal Update: June 2, 2022
Page 27 of 76

Exhibit A

02.16.2026

Aaron Milner
Nik Stroup
City of Bothell Parks & Recreation
21233 20th Ave SE, Bothell, WA 98021
Bothell, WA 98021
Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services – 1st Lt. Madrazo U.S.M.C. Memorial Park
Additional Services Request 07
Hi Aaron and Nik:
Based on results from potholing exploration and the need for stormwater system antiflotation design, we have put together the below additional scope requested for the project.
The list below includes descriptions of work needed for design revisions of the system, in
addition to permit comment requests. Please review and let us know if you have any
questions or comments. We are excited to get this project finally on the road to
construction!

Additional Services Scope
Additional work required by City of Both permit review
• Coordinate heavy duty asphalt pavement section with the City. We have
included efforts to define options for the pavement section and updating the
plans and details.
• Coordinate sight distance requirements for access to North Creek Parkway with
City of Bothell. We have included effort for preparing two sight triangle
diagrams (one for the access driveway and one for the maintenance driveway)
and including those diagrams on an additional plan sheet for permitting.
• Coordinate revised paving, grading, and storm drainage design for removal of
the parking spaces per the City’s requirements for throat length along the
driveway. We have included efforts for plan updates for the design change.
• Quantify site acreage and percentage of impervious surface for the entire King
County property for inclusion on the drawings.
• We have included one additional round of permit comment resolution for the
design changes described above.
Detention System Anti-Flotation Civil Engineering
Coordinate the anti-flotation design with the detention system manufacturer (Contech).
Includes one round of design updates to the anti-flotation system resulting from

Landscape Architecture
Urban Design

Berger Partnership PS
1927 Post Alley, Ste. 2
Seattle, WA 98101

206 325 6877
bergerpartnership.com

Page 28 of 76

2.16.26
Aaron Milner & Nik Stroup
City of Bothell Parks & Recreation
Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services – 1st Lt. Madrazo U.S.M.C. Memorial Park
Additional Services 07
Page 2 of 3

manufacturer review. We have assumed the anti-flotation design will not change the
detention system layout.
•

•

Prepare the following plans for the anti-flotation system. We have included one
round of permit comment resolution for design of the anti-flotation system.
o Detention System Enlargements
o Anti-Flotation Details
We have included effort already completed to assist the City in selection of an
ecology block anti-flotation system. This effort included identifying design options
and a recommended solution for the City’s selection.

Detention System Anti-Flotation Structural Engineering
•

Prepare structural design for the anti-flotation system including:
o Determination of buoyancy forces
o Design of strap hold downs
o Determination of required number of ecology blocks

Construction Support Services
•
•

Provide additional civil and structural construction support services related to the
anti-flotation system, including responding to RFIs and review of submittals.
Due to project schedule extensions since 2023, we have included additional
construction support fee in this proposal to account for staff rate changes that have
occurred beyond the schedule assumed in our original scope of services.

Fees
Based on the scope of services identified at this time, we have established a fee for
landscape architectural services as follows:
Subconsultant Fees
Civil Engineering
Structural Engineering
Subconsultant 10% Markup
Total

$29,400.00
$4,000.00
$3,340.00
$36,740.00

Total

$36,740.00

Fees are requested on a lump-sum basis for accomplishing the above scope of services.
Services beyond those noted in this proposal will be billed as additional services on an hourly
basis as follows, or lump sum fees can be negotiated:

Page 29 of 76

2.16.26
Aaron Milner & Nik Stroup
City of Bothell Parks & Recreation
Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services – 1st Lt. Madrazo U.S.M.C. Memorial Park
Additional Services 07
Page 3 of 3

Principal
Associate
Project Manager
Landscape Designer
Administrative Staff

$260.00 per hour
$220.00 per hour
$180.00 per hour
$150.00 per hour
$130.00 per hour

All accounts are due in 90 days. If payment for services is not received within 120 days of the
invoice date, all subsequent services and/or issuance of documents may be postponed until
receipt of payment, unless special arrangements are made prior to providing the services.
If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign one copy and return it to our office. If
you have questions, would like more information, or wish to make any modifications, please
do not hesitate to contact us. We look forward to working together! Work will be scheduled
upon our receipt of the signed proposal.
Sincerely,
Berger Partnership PS

Andy Mitton
Principal, ASLA, PLA

Anna O’Connell
Principal, ASLA, PLA

APPROVED:

Date

Page 30 of 76

Agenda Bill
AB # 26-040

TO:

Mayor Thompson and Members of the City Council

FROM:

Mathew Pruitt, Director of Employee and Technology Services

DATE:

March 17, 2026

SUBJECT:

Personnel Policy Section 3.6 - No Rehire or Third-Party Engagement

COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve a resolution adopting Personnel Policy Section 3.6 - No Rehire or Third‑Party
Engagement.
HISTORY:
Date Action
Council adopted current version of Personnel Policies and Procedures
by Resolution, including Section 1.1 that states Council is responsible
December 18, 2008
for approving new Personnel Policies while the City Manager is
responsible for procedural changes.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed Personnel Policy Section 3.6 establishes clear eligibility requirements to ensure
that individuals previously separated from City employment due to substantiated violations of
City policy involving discriminatory, harassing, threatening, or violent conduct are not eligible
for rehire, nor for performing work for the City through third‑party engagement, including
contractors, vendors, consultants, or authorized independent service providers.
The policy is designed to protect the safety, dignity, and well‑being of City employees, the
community, and City operations, including facilities, systems, and critical infrastructure.
Key elements of proposed Policy Section 3.6 are:
•

Applies to all City departments and all categories of employment or service.

Page 31 of 76

•
•

Prohibits rehire or third-party engagement of individuals separated due to substantiated
policy violations involving discriminatory, harassing, threatening, or violent behavior.
Establishes that the City will not knowingly enter into any relationship placing such
individuals in roles with access to City operations, staff, facilities, systems, or critical
infrastructure.

Procedural elements (authorized under the City Manager) include:
•
•
•
•

Creation and maintenance of a debarment list.
Documentation and reporting processes.
An appeals process with final review by the City Manager.
Guidelines for exceptions (e.g., humanitarian reasons, rare critical skills, location
considerations).

POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Under Section 1.1 of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual, City Council approval is
required for adoption of personnel policies, while the procedures implementing such policies
fall within the City Manager’s authority. This action confirms the Council’s statutory role in
setting personnel policies and reinforces the City’s commitment to maintaining a safe, inclusive,
and respectful workplace.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adoption of the policy. Minimal administrative
workload will be absorbed by Human Resources as part of normal operations.
ATTACHMENTS:
Att-1 Resolution
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve a resolution adopting Personnel Policy Section 3.6 - No Rehire or Third‑Party
Engagement.

Page 32 of 76

RESOLUTION NO.________ (2026)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING PERSONNEL POLICY SECTION 3.6 – NO
REHIRE OR THIRD-PARTY ENGAGEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the current version of the City’s Personnel
Policies and Procedures on December 18, 2008, which includes Section 1.1 stating that
the City Council is responsible for approving personnel policy while the City Manager is
responsible for establishing and maintaining associated procedures; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to maintain a safe, respectful, and inclusive workplace
for all employees, contractors, volunteers, and community members; and
WHEREAS, City Staff drafted Personnel Policy Section 3.6 – No Rehire or ThirdParty Engagement to establish clear eligibility requirements ensuring that individuals
previously separated due to substantiated violations involving discriminatory, harassing,
threatening, or violent conduct are not eligible for rehire or for engagement through thirdparty relationships; and
WHEREAS, the City will not knowingly enter or maintain any relationship that
would place such individuals in positions with access to City facilities, systems, staff,
operations, or critical infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager will maintain administrative procedures associated
with the policy, including management of the debarment list, documentation, and the
appeals process; and
WHEREAS, adoption of Personnel Policy Section 3.6 carries no direct fiscal
impact, and any administrative burden will be absorbed by Human Resources as part of
normal operations.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. ADOPTION OF PERSONNEL POLICY SECTION 3.6. The City Council
hereby adopts Personnel Policy Section 3.6 – No Rehire or Third-Party Engagement
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 2. CITY MANAGER TO ADOPT PROCEDURES. Consistent with
Personnel Policy Section 1.1, the City Manager is authorized to approve and maintain

Page 33 of 76

procedures necessary to administer the policy, including management of the debarment
list, documentation processes, notification procedures, reporting expectations, and the
appeals process.
Section 3. CORRECTIONS. The City Clerk is authorized to make necessary
corrections to this resolution including, but not limited to, scrivener’s errors, references,
resolution numbering, and section numbering without altering the intent of the Council.
PASSED this ___________ day of ______________________2026
APPROVED:

MASON THOMPSON
MAYOR
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:

LAURA HATHAWAY
CITY CLERK

FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.: ________(2026)

Page 34 of 76

EMPLOYMENT

3.6

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Personnel Policy Adopted by Res.: DATE

NO REHIRE OR THIRD-PARTY ENGAGEMENT

Personnel Procedures Approved: DATE APPROVED

1.

PURPOSE: This policy establishes clear eligibility requirements to ensure that
individuals who have previously engaged in discriminatory or violent conduct do
not return to City operations through direct employment or indirect relationships.
The policy protects the safety, dignity, and well-being of City employees and the
public, and safeguards City facilities, systems, and critical infrastructure.

2.

SCOPE: This policy applies to all City departments, divisions, and offices, as well
as all hiring managers, supervisors, administrative staff, contractors,
subcontractors, vendors, consultants, service providers, authorized or seeking
authorization as an independent third-party service provider, and individuals
seeking employment or engagement with the City. It encompasses all roles—paid
or unpaid—that involve interaction with City staff, facilities, systems, or
infrastructure.

3.

DEFINITIONS:
A. Critical Infrastructure: Any physical or digital asset essential to City operations,
including but not limited to utilities, public safety systems, information technology
systems, transportation infrastructure, and secure facilities.
B. Discriminatory Conduct: Any behavior, language, or action that violates federal,
state, or City anti-discrimination policies, including but not limited to conduct based
on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age,
disability, veteran status, or any other protected class.
C. Separation for Cause: Separation for Cause: Termination, resignation in lieu of
termination, negotiated separation, or any other form of employment separation
resulting from substantiated violations of City policy. This includes separation or
severance agreements negotiated due to policy violations and any resignation
initiated to avoid disciplinary actions.
D. Ineligible Former Employee or Third-Party: Any former employee who has been
separated for cause due to substantiated violations of City policy involving
discriminatory, harassing, threatening, or violent language or behavior who owns
or has ownership of a business, firm, company, or self-employed is ineligible to
engage with the city through contracts or directly providing services without a
contract. Ineligible third party may include consultants, professional service
providers, and others who are engaged to carry out specific tasks or projects for
the City or any work related to City facilities, operations, or systems.
E. Violent Conduct: Any behavior, language, threat, or action that constitutes or
implies physical harm, intimidation, harassment, or endangerment of others,

Page 35 of 76

3.6 No Rehire or Third-Party Engagement

Page 2 of 4

including threats of violence, aggressive physical behavior, or actions that
compromise safety.
4.

POLICY: The City of Bothell is committed to maintaining a safe, respectful, and
inclusive environment for all employees, contractors, volunteers, and community
members. To uphold this commitment, individuals who have been separated for
cause due to substantiated violations of City policy involving discriminatory,
harassing, threatening, or violent language or behavior are ineligible for future
employment, or work as a third-party in any role that interacts with City staff,
facilities, systems, or critical infrastructure.
The City will not knowingly enter or maintain any relationship with ineligible third
parties or former employees that would place such individuals in positions of
access, authority, or interaction with City operations.
If an ineligible former employee becomes part of any contract awarded to other
third parties who are otherwise eligible to work with the city, the City reserves the
right to request removal of ineligible individual(s) from performing contracted work
for the City and to provide a replacement consultant, service provider, vendor or
contractor.

5.

PROCEDURES:
A. Creation of a Debarment List: The City will create and maintain a debarment list of
ineligible third parties or former employees who are subject to this policy.
•
•
•

•
•

Identification: Human Resources (HR) will compile a list of individuals
separated from City employment due to substantiated violations involving
discriminatory, harassing, threatening, or violent language or behavior.
Documentation: HR will document the reasons the former employee or third
party is ineligible and ensure all records are updated and securely stored.
Notification: HR will work with relevant departments and City staff to notify the
appropriate parties about the individuals on the debarment list to ensure they
are not considered for re-employment, work through ineligible third party or as
part of other awarded contracts through other eligible firms, contractors,
vendors, businesses.
Regular Updates: The debarment list will be regularly updated to reflect any
new additions or changes based on substantiated violations.
Access Control: Only authorized personnel will have access to the Ban List to
maintain confidentiality and ensure proper enforcement.

B. Enforcement: The City acknowledges that each situation is unique, and as such,
all cases will be individually assessed to determine the appropriate course of
action. Factors that will be considered include the severity of the violation, any
mitigating or aggravating circumstances, the history of the individual or entity
involved, and the potential impact on City operations and public trust. By evaluating
each case on its own merits, the City aims to ensure fairness, proportionality, and

Page 36 of 76

3.6 No Rehire or Third-Party Engagement

Page 3 of 4

consistency in its enforcement actions. Vendors or contractors may be asked to
remove any identified individual from City work
immediately upon notification.
C. Reporting and Response:
•
•
•

Any City employee who becomes aware of any situation related to this policy
must report the information to HR.
Any City employee who becomes aware of any concerns, or has concerns,
regarding the presence of a former employee, must report the information to
HR.
HR will investigate and take appropriate action and report its findings to the
relevant Department Director and the reporting employee.

D. Recordkeeping: HR will maintain documentation of separations for cause and
records of any violations and corrective actions that apply to this policy. All records
will be maintained in accordance with state public records laws and City retention
schedules.
6. EXCEPTIONS: This policy is subject to applicable collective bargaining agreements and
existing separation or settlement agreements. Outside of that, no exceptions to this
policy may be granted without written approval from the City Manager and consultation
with the City Attorney’s Office.
Any exception must be documented. Exceptions may include but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
7.

Humanitarian Grounds: When an individual's unique circumstances, such as
severe health issues or family emergencies, warrant special consideration.
Critical Skills: If the individual possesses rare and essential skills or experience
that are critical to a City project and cannot be easily replaced.
Location: Work performed by the former employee is not onsite and is not in
direct contact with City employees.
Rehabilitation Evidence: When there is substantial evidence of rehabilitation and
reformation, indicating that the individual no longer poses a risk for the conduct
that led to their ineligibility and has demonstrated consistent positive behavior.
Legal Requirements: When compliance with other legal requirements or court
orders necessitates an exception.
APPEALS PROCESS: Any decision made under this policy may be appealed for
review by the City Manager. The appeals process is as follows:
1) The appealing party must submit a written appeal to HR within 30 days of the
decision, detailing the grounds for the appeal and any supporting
documentation.
2) HR will forward the appeal to the City Manager, who will review the case in
consultation with the City Attorney’s Office if necessary.

Page 37 of 76

3.6 No Rehire or Third-Party Engagement

Page 4 of 4

3) The City Manager may request additional information or a meeting with the
appealing party to further understand the circumstances.
4) The City Manager will issue a written decision on the appeal within 60 days of
receiving the appeal, outlining the rationale for the decision.
5) The decision of the City Manager is final and will be communicated to the
appealing party and relevant Department Director.
8.

REVIEW AND UPDATES: This policy will be reviewed at least every three years,
or sooner if required by changes in law, City operations, or best practices.

Page 38 of 76

Agenda Bill
AB # 26-041

TO:

Mayor Thompson and Members of the City Council

FROM:

Laura Hathaway, City Clerk
Kyle Stannert, City Manager

DATE:

March 17, 2026

SUBJECT:

Sound Cities Association Membership

COUNCIL ACTION:
Provide direction to staff regarding Sound Cities Association (SCA) membership and approve a
resolution to terminate membership if desired.
HISTORY:
Date Action
Council expressed interest in discussing the value of continued
November 18, 2025 involvement in Sound Cities Association (SCA) as one of the external
assignments
January 6, 2026

Council study session regarding committee assignments and
continuation of SCA membership

January 13, 2026

Council moved to postpone a decision on SCA membership until
February 17, 2026

February 17, 2026

Council moved to postpone a decision on SCA membership until
March 17, 2026

DISCUSSION:
The Sound Cities Association (SCA) is a regional organization made up of 38 cities
within King County. SCA’s current vision statement is “Capitalizing on the diversity of
our cities to lead policy change to make the Puget Sound region the best in the world.”

Page 39 of 76

To do so, representatives from member cities take part in meetings and committees to
inform regional policy goals. A full list of appointments selected by SCA committees
can be found online at: https://soundcities.org/appointment-booklet/.
Recently, the Bothell City Council has engaged in discussions on the city’s future
participation as members in the Sound Cities Association. On January 6, staff was
asked to return with a resolution for Council consideration to terminate membership
in the association. Also at that meeting, the Mayor and Deputy Mayor agreed to reach
out to the Executive Director of SCA for a meeting to discuss Council’s decision. This
meeting took place on January 9, 2026.
On January 13, the Deputy Mayor provided an update to Council on the meeting, and
the decision was made to delay action until February 17 to allow SCA time to respond.
The Council again discussed membership and agreed to reconsider action at tonight’s
meeting. During the discussion, Council asked for the status of 2026 dues. Subsequent
to that discussion, SCA staff have confirmed a balance due for 2026 membership of
$25,111.61 along with a willingness to support Council’s continued discussions about
the city’s participation in the organization.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Councilmembers serve on various internal and regional committees. These committees address
issues of interest to the residents of Bothell, and this structure allows for Council to better
manage its work efforts while optimizing resources. Terms are for two years, unless otherwise
noted.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Membership dues (where applicable) and staff time for the current roster of committees have
been anticipated in the 2025-26 Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Att-1 Resolution
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Provide direction to staff regarding Sound Cities Association (SCA) membership and approve a
resolution to terminate membership if desired.

Page 40 of 76

RESOLUTION NO.

(2026)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, TERMINATING MEMBERSHIP WITHIN THE SOUND
CITIES ASSOCIATION

WHEREAS, the City Council of Bothell held a study session on January 6, 2026,
discussing the merits of continuing the City’s membership within the Sound Cities
Association; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to terminate the City of Bothell’s membership
within the Sound Cities Association.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOTHELL,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TERMINATING SCA MEMBERSHIP. The City Council hereby directs
the City Manager to notify the Sound Cities Association of the City’s intent to terminate
its membership with the Sound Cities Association.
Section 2. The City Clerk is authorized to make necessary corrections to this
resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors,
references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any references
thereto.
PASSED this ________day of _______________2026.
APPROVED:

ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:

MASON THOMPSON
MAYOR

LAURA HATHAWAY
CITY CLERK

Page 41 of 76

FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:
(2026)

Page 42 of 76

Agenda Bill
AB # 26-042

TO:

Mayor Thompson and Members of the City Council

FROM:

Laura Hathaway, City Clerk

DATE:

March 17, 2026

SUBJECT:

2026 Council Subcommittee Recommendations for Board & Commission
Interviews

COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve the subcommittee recommendations for Board & Commission interviews on March
24, 2026.
HISTORY:
Date Action
Council approved the 2026/2027 Council Committee Assignments
January 13, 2026 including a Council subcommittee to review Board & Commission
applications
January 202026 Board & Commission Recruitment
February 20, 2026
Subcommittee members Councilmember Dodd, Councilmember AlMarch 9, 2026 Kabra and alternate Councilmember Miles submitted their
recommendations and proposed interview questions to the City Clerk
DISCUSSION:
The annual recruitment period for Boards & Commissions was opened January 20, 2026 and
closed February 20, 2026 for 11 open positions among the five Council-appointed Boards &
Commissions: Arts Commission (2), Landmark Preservation Board (1), Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee (3), Parks & Recreation Board (3), and Planning Commission (2). A total of 40 eligible
applications were received.

Page 43 of 76

A Council subcommittee made up of Councilmember Dodd and Councilmember Al-Kabra, and
alternate Councilmember Miles, reviewed the applications and developed potential interview
questions, and submitted their recommendations to the City Clerk on March 9.
In addition to finalizing a list of candidates, Council may also wish to discuss interview logistics
including length of interviews and drafting of questions. Standard procedures for interviews can
be found in Chapter 10.02(D) of the City Council Protocol Manual (pages 43-44).
POLICY CONSIDERATION: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Att-1 Subcommittee Recommendations (For Council distribution only)
Att-2 Subcommittee Interview Questions (For Council distribution only)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the subcommittee recommendations for Board & Commission interviews on March
24, 2026.

Page 44 of 76

Agenda Bill
AB # 26-043

TO:

Mayor Thompson and Members of the City Council

FROM:

Ken Seuberlich, Chief of Police
Michael O’Neil, Police Sergeant
Callie Regan, Sr. Management Analyst

DATE:

March 17, 2026

SUBJECT:

Body Worn Camera Project

COUNCIL ACTION:
Staff are sharing preliminary information and seeking Council input to inform the next phases of
work.
HISTORY:
Date Action
July 16, 2024

Council reviewed the Police Department’s Policy on Technology,
Intelligence, Surveillance and Information (Att-1)

December 3, 2024

Ordinance adopting the 2025-26 budget which included the
exploration of body worn camera implementation as an activity

DISCUSSION:
Benefits & Risks
The Bothell Police Department is exploring the implementation of a body-worn camera (BWC)
program to enhance transparency, strengthen public trust, and align with evolving community
expectations and recognized best practice in modern policing. Body-worn cameras have
become a widely adopted public safety tool, and the department has observed increased
community interest, as reflected in the growing number of requests for video footage.
In addition, local prosecutors increasingly prefer body-worn camera footage when evaluating
cases, making this capability operationally important for effective case development. The
absence of video evidence in certain cases has made prosecution more difficult and, in some

Page 45 of 76

instances, has resulted in cases being declined. Regional adoption of body-worn cameras has
expanded significantly in recent years, and most neighboring agencies in King and Snohomish
Counties have implemented or are actively implementing body-worn camera programs. As
expectations for objective documentation continue to increase, the Department believes it is
prudent to evaluate implementation of a body-worn camera program through a structured and
deliberate process.
Research and experience from other jurisdictions suggest that body-worn cameras can reduce
complaints, support improved case outcomes, and provide objective documentation of police
interactions. As policy development progresses, the Police Department will continue to identify
specific operational use cases and develop performance measures that will allow the city to
evaluate whether the program is achieving its intended outcomes.
Implementation of a body-worn camera program also presents several risks and operational
considerations that must be addressed thoughtfully. These include privacy concerns for both
community members and officers, the potential for unwanted disclosure or misuse of footage,
and the increased volume and complexity of Public Records Act (PRA) requests. Washington’s
Public Records Act framework requires careful review and redaction of sensitive information
prior to release, which will significantly increase administrative workload. Additional staffing
and resources will be required to ensure compliance with redaction obligations, records
retention laws, and digital evidence management standards.
Financial impacts include the cost of equipment, licensing, secure cloud storage, maintenance,
training, and additional staffing to support digital evidence management. Experience from
other local jurisdictions demonstrates that body-worn camera programs costs can exceed initial
estimates if staffing and infrastructure needs are not fully considered. Agencies have found it
necessary to add staff to address the increased workload associated with digital evidence
redactions. For that reason, this Agenda Bill incorporates a staffing model to ensure responsible
implementation.
Policy & Program Considerations
To address the operational and privacy considerations, the Department’s recommended
program framework incorporates several policy safeguards designed to balance transparency
with privacy protections. Recording would be required during reportable law enforcement
activity, including calls for service, enforcement actions, investigative encounters, and use-offorce incidents. The policy would also clearly define circumstances in which recording may be
limited, such as sensitive medical settings, privileged communications, or areas where a
heightened expectation of privacy exists, consistent with Washington law. Officers would not
be permitted to copy, edit, alter, or delete recordings. All original footage would be securely
retained, and only trained and authorized personnel would conduct redactions prior to lawful
release. Data would be stored in a CJIS-compliant secure environment with encryption,
restricted role-based access controls, and audit logging to ensure accountability and prevent
unauthorized access. Program and policy details will be further developed by the Police

Page 46 of 76

Department during the next phases of work and will be informed by the community and
existing best practices (Att-2).
Legal Summary
The legal framework governing law enforcement video is complex and requires strict
compliance with multiple statutory provisions. Under the Public Records Act (PRA), police
departments must disclose certain records upon request; however, state law provides specific
exemptions for body-worn camera footage. RCW 42.56.240(14) provides exemptions to protect
privacy where nondisclosure is essential under RCW 42.56.050. Recordings in sensitive
contexts, such as medical facilities, private residences, interactions involving minors, intimate
content, deceased persons, domestic violence victims, or anonymous witnesses, are presumed
to be highly offensive if disclosed and are therefore exempt from release absent compelling
public interest. Retention of footage will comply with Ch. 40.14 RCW and Washington State
records retention schedules. Generally, non-evidentiary footage may be retained for the
minimum statutory period, at least 60 days depending on classification and applicable retention
schedules, while evidentiary footage must be retained through the conclusion of criminal
proceedings and applicable appeal periods. Footage related to use-of-force incidents,
complaints, or critical incidents may require extended retention consistent with legal and risk
management standards. The city also has the option to issue third party notice, allowing
affected individuals to assert their own privacy rights.
Implementation of a body-worn camera program involves mandatory subjects of bargaining
under Ch. 41.56 RCW. The Police Department will fulfill its obligation to engage in collective
bargaining with affected bargaining units. Commonly bargained topics include activation
expectations, review procedures, discipline standards, data access, retention policies, and
training requirements. The Department intends to collaborate with bargaining representatives
to ensure a program that enhances transparency and accountability while protecting employee
rights.
Project Management Details
The cost for the Initiation Phase is covered by the allocation already made by Council in the
2026 budget. Estimates for camera procurement, implementation, and maintenance will be
developed and refined as the project progresses and additional departments contribute input.
Including staffing and infrastructure in this estimate is intended to ensure the Police
Department can meet statutory compliance obligations associated with digital evidence
management and Public Records Act processing.
The project is currently in Phase 0, which consists of preliminary research and scoping to gather
the information needed for today’s discussion. If Council supports continuing, the project will
move into Phase 1: Initiation. Phase 1 would not authorize procurement or deployment of
body-worn cameras. Rather, it would focus on confirming the project’s value and continuing to
refine its core elements. Key outputs of Phase 1 include a project charter defining roles,
responsibilities, and scope; a stakeholder register; a communication plan; and the start of
community outreach consistent with RCW requirements and Council direction. This outreach

Page 47 of 76

would support a feasibility assessment conducted during this phase. Subsequent phases would
include the following:
Phase 2 - Planning: the team would translate the project vision into an actionable roadmap.
This includes developing the project plan, work breakdown structure, and detailed
requirements for technology, policies, staffing, and other program components.
Phase 3 - Execution: involves implementing the planned work, completing project tasks, and
managing procurement, training, system setup, and related activities.
Phase 4 - Monitor and Control: the team ensures stable progress, addresses emerging issues,
and verifies that the project remains on track.
Phase 5 - Closeout: the project is finalized and a retrospective is conducted to capture lessons
learned.
POLICY CONSIDERATION:
The use of body-worn cameras in Washington is governed by several state laws, including but
not limited to the Public Records Act (Ch. 42.56 RCW), criminal records privacy requirements
(Ch. 10.97 RCW), public records retention laws (Ch. 40.14 RCW), requirements for agency body
camera policies and community involvement (Ch. 10.109 RCW), collective bargaining
obligations (Ch. 41.56 RCW), and guidance from AGO 2014 No. 8 regarding recording of public
interactions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding has been included in the 2025-26 biennial budget to support policy and operational
analysis of a potential program and is sufficient to cover the Initiation and Planning work being
proposed. Overall costs of future phases will be discussed with Council before implementation
begins.
ATTACHMENTS:
Att-1 Technology Surveillance and Intelligence Policy
Att-2 Model Act Regulating Use of Body Worn Cameras by Law Enforcement
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Provide staff with guidance on the highest priority policy and program questions to explore, as
well as the target audiences for community outreach, in the next phases of work.

Page 48 of 76

Number: BPD – 0219

Pages: 6

Effective Date:
10/07/2025

Amends/Rescinds:

Review: Annually
Approving Authority: Chief Kenneth Seuberlich

WASPC Standard(s): 5.4, 5.5, 6.3
219.1

Subject: Technology, Surveillance, and
Intelligence

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The Bothell Police Department is committed to utilizing technologies and intelligence
strategies to ensure the safety and security of the community it serves. Police technology
encompasses a wide array of tools and systems designed to enhance law enforcement
efforts. This includes but is not limited to security cameras, data analytics software,
automated license plate readers, remotely operated aerial systems, GPS tracking
devices, and digital communication platforms. Intelligence gathering involves collecting,
analyzing, and disseminating information to support operational decisions and
investigations.
In implementing these technologies and intelligence practices, the Bothell Police
Department recognizes the paramount importance of safeguarding its community
members' privacy interests and constitutional rights. Respect for individual privacy and
adherence to legal and ethical standards are fundamental principles guiding our use of
information and surveillance methods. We are committed to transparency and
accountability in our operations, ensuring that our actions are conducted within the
bounds of the law and with due regard for civil liberties.
The Bothell Police Department is dedicated to leveraging information and intelligence to
enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of our law enforcement activities. By harnessing
the power of data analysis and technological advancements, we aim to more precisely
investigate criminal activity, respond to calls for service, such as missing persons or
natural disasters, and proactively address emerging threats to public safety. We will
leverage these resources to improve our response capabilities and foster stronger
relationships with our community.
This policy will address the use of technology and intelligence by the Bothell Police
Department relating to:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR)
Remotely Operated Aerial Systems (commonly known as drones)
Security Cameras (fixed and mobile)
Robot Cameras (throw-bot and other robot platforms)
Body Worn Cameras/Car Cameras
GPS Tracking Devices

Page 49 of 76

BOTHELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

NUMBER:
BPD – 0219

SUBJECT: Technology, Surveillance, and Intelligence

219.2
•
•
•
•

PAGE
2 of 6
EFFECTIVE DATE:
10/07/2025

DEFINITIONS

Intelligence Gathering: The systematic collection, analysis, and dissemination of
information to support decision-making and law enforcement operations.
Surveillance Technology: Tools and systems used for observing, recording, or
analyzing activities, including cameras, drones, and tracking devices.
Public Trust: Confidence that the community places in law enforcement to act in
a lawful, ethical, and transparent manner.
Equity Impacts: The effects of policies and practices on different community
groups, especially those historically marginalized or disadvantaged.

219.3

PUBLIC TRUST

Public trust is integral to police legitimacy. The Bothell Police Department recognizes this
and follows the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (Final Report of the
President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing | Office of Justice Programs)
recommendation that in order to achieve external legitimacy, law enforcement agencies
should involve the community in the process of developing and evaluating policies and
procedures. This policy was written with community involvement to include the Chief’s
Advisory Committee, feedback at public events, and nonprofit service providers. When
possible, this policy will be evaluated and updated with continued community feedback.
The City of Bothell is committed to reviewing equity impacts in our operations, services,
and programs as a part of our Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging Roadmap. The
Bothell Police Department values this commitment and has crafted this policy with it in
mind.
219.4

AUTHORIZED USE

Intelligence-gathering technologies shall only be used for official law enforcement
business and never for personal use. Authorized personnel may utilize intelligence and
information-gathering technology and systems to further police investigations and ensure
public safety. Agencies requesting intelligence gathering information must be approved
by the Division Captain prior to authorization. Requesting agencies must provide a case
number, the name of the officer requesting the information, and the crime being
investigated. Authorization will only be granted on a case-by-case basis and must align
with Washington State Law, local laws and codes, as well as policy.

Page 50 of 76

BOTHELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

NUMBER:
BPD – 0219

SUBJECT: Technology, Surveillance, and Intelligence

219.5

PAGE
3 of 6
EFFECTIVE DATE:
10/07/2025

PROHIBITED USE

Department members shall not use or allow others to use equipment or data-based
records for any unauthorized purpose.
It is expressly prohibited for any member of the Bothell Police Department to engage in
discriminatory practices based on factors such as actual or perceived race, color, religion,
creed, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ethnicity,
disability, veteran status, marital status, partnership status, pregnancy status, political
affiliation or beliefs, or citizenship status when utilizing intelligence and informationgathering technology and systems. Targeting individuals or communities based on
protected characteristics violates civil rights laws and undermines trust in law
enforcement (See Policy BPD- 1318 Biased Based Profiling).
The Bothell Police Department does not utilize facial recognition software to identify
persons whose images have been captured by information-gathering technology. An
exception shall be for locating missing and/or exploited children as authorized by the
National Child Search Assistance Act (1990) (See Attachment A).
In addition, it is prohibited to use intelligence and information-gathering technology and
systems when;
•
•
•
•
•

personnel accessing the information or system are not trained or authorized, or
information acquired is not for legitimate law enforcement purposes, or
technology is used for unauthorized purposes, such as tracking individuals without
legitimate cause, conducting unauthorized background checks, or using
surveillance capabilities for personal or political reasons, or
outside agencies do not provide the required information outside agencies have
not received captain approval, or
the request does not adhere to Washington State Law, local laws and codes, as
well as policy.

219.6

DATA COLLECTION AND RETENTION

Data and information will only be collected when legitimate law enforcement or public
safety purposes exist.
All data and information shall be retained in accordance with the State of Washington
records retention schedule, as outlined in RCW 10.97 (Washington State Criminal

Page 51 of 76

BOTHELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

NUMBER:
BPD – 0219

SUBJECT: Technology, Surveillance, and Intelligence

PAGE
4 of 6
EFFECTIVE DATE:
10/07/2025

Records Privacy Act), RCW 40.14 (Preservation and Destruction of Public Records), and
RCW 42.56 (Public Records Act).
219.7

DATA ACCESS AND PROTECTION

A. Only personnel trained and authorized to retrieve or view protected data shall
have access.
B. Department members accessing or working with protected data or intelligence
shall take appropriate steps (in compliance with other department and city
policies) to ensure compliance with ACCESS, CJIS, or other protected
information as required.
219.8

CIVIL LIBERTIES, RIGHTS PROTECTION, EQUITY CONCERNS

The Bothell Police Department is dedicated to building and maintaining trust with the
community and utilizing resources efficiently in its public safety endeavors. The
Department recognizes the need to protect its ownership and control over shared
information and protect the privacy and civil liberties of the public, according to federal
and state law. The procedures described within this policy (Data Access, Data Protection,
Data Retention, Public Access, and Third-Party Data Sharing) protect against the
unauthorized use of data and/or private information.
The Department is committed to ensuring collected data is not used in a way that would
violate or infringe upon anyone's civil rights and/or liberties, including but not limited to
potentially disparate or adverse impacts on any communities or groups.
When using the information gathering systems described in this policy, department
personnel will not target any person solely based on their actual or perceived race, color,
religion, creed, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, national origin,
ethnicity, disability, veteran status, marital status, partnership status, pregnancy status,
political affiliation or beliefs, or citizenship status. Nothing in this policy is intended to
prohibit department personnel from considering factors such as race or ethnicity in
combination with other legitimate factors to establish reasonable suspicion or probable
cause (e.g., suspect description is limited to a specific race or group).
219.9

PUBLIC ACCESS

All data, information, and intelligence gathered are for the official use of the Bothell Police
Department. Such data may contain confidential information and is not open to public
review except as requested and authorized by the Washington State Public Records Act
(RCW 42.56).

Page 52 of 76

BOTHELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

NUMBER:
BPD – 0219

SUBJECT: Technology, Surveillance, and Intelligence

PAGE
5 of 6
EFFECTIVE DATE:
10/07/2025

For some systems, such as School Zone ALPRs and Remotely Operated Aerial Systems,
the Bothell Police Department publishes transparency portals on department web
platforms to allow the community to review information pertinent to those systems.
219.10

AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS (ALPR)

The Bothell Police Department utilizes ALPR technology to support authorized law
enforcement and public safety purposes such as traffic enforcement and criminal
investigations.
The Department shall operate ALPRs and use the information obtained as prescribed by
BPD ALPR policy BPD-225.
219.11

REMOTELY OPERATED AERIAL SYSTEMS (ROAS/DRONES)

The Bothell Police Department utilizes Remotely Operated Aerial Systems (drones) to
protect lives and property in a constitutional and legally sound manner. Drones may be
used in circumstances to enhance life safety, protect property, detect possible dangers
that could not otherwise be seen, save time, create efficiencies, and enhance evidence
collection. Drones may also be utilized when other means and resources are unavailable
or are less effective, such as fixed winged aircraft or helicopters.
The Department shall operate Remotely Operated Arial Systems and use the information
obtained as prescribed by BPD ROAS policy 0220.
219.12

SECURITY CAMERAS, FIXED AND MOBILE

The Bothell Police Department has access to security cameras in the City of
Bothell. These cameras include city-owned security cameras and cameras located in
certain traffic areas. Private companies and community members may share video
camera footage with the Department, either recorded or in real-time. These video
files/feeds shall be accessed only by trained and authorized personnel. Capture or
recording of the video/feed shall occur only for legitimate law enforcement or public safety
purposes.
The Department may utilize and has access to security/surveillance cameras temporarily
placed in response to a criminal investigation. These cameras shall be placed, operated,
and viewed by trained and authorized personnel. A division commander's authorization
shall be obtained prior to the camera being placed. Personnel placing cameras shall
ensure due care is taken regarding the privacy rights of community members. When

Page 53 of 76

BOTHELL POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

NUMBER:
BPD – 0219

SUBJECT: Technology, Surveillance, and Intelligence

PAGE
6 of 6
EFFECTIVE DATE:
10/07/2025

cameras are positioned, consideration should be made to limit the field of view so as not
to capture uninvolved persons or property unnecessarily, as per department training.
The information and/or recordings produced by the cameras shall be maintained
according to BPD Property and Evidence Policy 0900, BPD Digital Image Evidence Policy
0908, and BPD Records Management System Policy 1000.
219.13

ROBOT CAMERAS (THROWBOT AND/OR OTHER
PLATFORMS)

The Bothell Police Department may utilize robotic cameras capable of transmitting or
recording video signals.
Should the Department acquire any robotic camera systems capable of transmitting or
recording video signals or files, the provisions and prohibitions in this policy shall be
applicable.
219.14

BODY-WORN CAMERAS

The Bothell Police Department does not currently utilize body-worn cameras (BWCs).
Should the Department acquire or utilize BWCs, the policy providing for the use of the
cameras, as well as the provisions and prohibitions in this policy, shall be applicable.
219.15

GPS TRACKING DEVICES

The Bothell Police Department utilizes GPS tracking devices to reduce and solve crime
and apprehend persons suspected of criminal activity. These applications can include
usage of bait property deployments or placements approved with judicial search warrants.
Usage of these GPS tracking devices is governed under Policy 235: GPS Tracking
Devices, and includes allowable disclosure of data, authorized access to the data, and
privacy concerns.

Page 54 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

A MODEL ACT FOR REGULATING THE USE OF
BODY WORN CAMERAS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT

Be it enacted by the [NAME OF THE STATE LEGISLATIVE BODY]:
SECTION 1.
(a)

Only law enforcement officers with the authority to conduct searches and make arrests shall be
permitted to wear a body camera. Such body cameras shall be worn in a location and manner
that maximizes the camera’s ability to capture video footage of the officer’s activities.

(b)

With respect to body camera activation and deactivation:
(1)

Both the video and audio recording functions of the body camera shall be activated
whenever a law enforcement officer is responding to a call for service or at the initiation
of any other law enforcement or investigative encounter between a law enforcement
officer and a member of the public, except that when an immediate threat to the officer’s
life or safety makes activating the camera impossible or dangerous, the officer shall
activate the camera at the first reasonable opportunity to do so.

(2)

The body camera shall not be deactivated until the encounter has fully concluded and the
law enforcement officer leaves the scene.

(3)

All body cameras shall be equipped with, and at all times have activated, a pre-event
buffering mode that causes the body camera to continuously record and retain the most
recent 30 seconds of video and audio prior to an officer’s activation of their body
camera. Such pre-event recordings shall attach to, and be considered a part of, any
recording that result from an officer’s activation of their body camera.
1
Page 55 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

(c)

A law enforcement officer who is wearing a body camera shall notify the subject(s) of the
recording that they are being recorded by a body camera as close to the inception of the
encounter as is reasonably possible.

(d)

Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (b):
(1)

Prior to entering a private residence without a warrant or in non-exigent circumstances, a
law enforcement officer shall ask the occupant if the occupant wants the officer to
discontinue use of the officer’s body camera. If the occupant responds affirmatively, the
law enforcement officer shall immediately discontinue use of the body camera;

(2)

When interacting with an apparent crime victim, a law enforcement officer shall, as soon
as practicable, ask the apparent crime victim, if the apparent crime victim wants the
officer to discontinue use of the officer’s body camera. If the apparent crime victim
responds affirmatively, the law enforcement officer shall immediately discontinue use of
the body camera; and

(3)

When interacting with a person seeking to anonymously report a crime or assist in an
ongoing law enforcement investigation, a law enforcement officer shall, as soon as
practicable, ask the person seeking to remain anonymous, if the person seeking to remain
anonymous wants the officer to discontinue use of the officer’s body camera. If the
person seeking to remain anonymous responds affirmatively, the law enforcement
officer shall immediately discontinue use of the body camera.

(e)

All law enforcement offers to discontinue the use of a body camera made pursuant to
subsection (d), and the responses thereto, shall be recorded by the body camera prior to
discontinuing use of the body camera.

(f)

Body cameras shall not be used surreptitiously.

(g)

Body cameras shall not be used to gather intelligence information based on First Amendment
protected speech, associations, or religion, or to record activity that is unrelated to a response to
2
Page 56 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

a call for service or a law enforcement or investigative encounter between a law enforcement
officer and a member of the public, and shall not be equipped with or subjected to any real time
facial recognition technologies.
(h)

Law enforcement officers shall not activate a body camera while on the grounds of any public,
private or parochial elementary or secondary school, except when responding to an imminent
threat to life or health.

(i)

Body camera video footage shall be retained by the law enforcement agency that employs the
officer whose camera captured the footage, or an authorized agent thereof, for six (6) months
from the date it was recorded, after which time such footage shall be permanently deleted.
(1)

During the six (6) month retention period, the following persons shall have the right to
inspect the body camera footage:
(A) Any person who is a subject of body camera video footage, and/or their designated
legal counsel;
(B) A parent of a minor subject of body camera video footage, and/or their designated
legal counsel;
(C) The spouse, next of kin or legally authorized designee of a deceased subject of body
camera video footage, and/or their designated legal counsel;
(D) A law enforcement officer whose body camera recorded the video footage, and/or
their designated legal counsel, subject to the limitations and restrictions in this Act;
(E) The superior officer of a law enforcement officer whose body camera recorded the
video footage, subject to the limitations and restrictions in this Act; and
(F) Any defense counsel who claims, pursuant to a written affidavit, to have a reasonable
basis for believing a video may contain evidence that exculpates a client.

(2)

The right to inspect subject to subsection (i)(1) shall not include the right to possess a copy
of the body camera video footage, unless the release of the body camera footage is
3
Page 57 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

otherwise authorized by this Act or by another applicable law.
(3)

When a body camera fails to capture some or all of the audio or video of an incident due to
malfunction, displacement of camera, or any other cause, any audio or video footage that is
captured shall be treated the same as any other body camera audio or video footage under
the law.

(j)

Notwithstanding the retention and deletion requirements in subsection (i):
(1)

Video footage shall be automatically retained for no less than three (3) years if the video
footage captures an interaction or event involving:
(A) Any use of force; or
(B) An encounter about which a complaint has been registered by a subject of the video
footage.

(2)

Body camera video footage shall also be retained for no less than three (3) years if a longer
retention period is voluntarily requested by:
(A) The law enforcement officer whose body camera recorded the video footage, if that
officer reasonably asserts the video footage has evidentiary or exculpatory value;
(B) Any law enforcement officer who is a subject of the video footage, if that officer
reasonably asserts the video footage has evidentiary or exculpatory value;
(C) Any superior officer of a law enforcement officer whose body camera recorded the
video footage or who is a subject of the video footage, if that superior officer
reasonably asserts the video footage has evidentiary or exculpatory value;
(D) Any law enforcement officer, if the video footage is being retained solely and
exclusively for police training purposes;
(E) Any member of the public who is a subject of the video footage;
(F) Any parent or legal guardian of a minor who is a subject of the video footage; or
(G) A deceased subject’s spouse, next of kin, or legally authorized designee.
4
Page 58 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

(k)

To effectuate subsections (j)(2)(E), (j)(2)(F) and (j)(2)(G), any member of the public who is a
subject of video footage, the parent or legal guardian of a minor who is a subject of the video
footage, or a deceased subject’s next of kin or legally authorized designee, shall be permitted to
review the specific video footage in question in order to make a determination as to whether
they will voluntarily request it be subjected to a three (3) year retention period.

(l)

All video footage of an interaction or event captured by a body camera, if that interaction or event
is identified with reasonable specificity and requested by a member of the public, shall be
provided to the person or entity making the request in accordance with the procedures for
requesting and providing government records set forth in the [NAME OF STATE OPEN
RECORDS ACT/FOIA LAW].
(1)

Notwithstanding the public release requirements in subsection (l), the following categories
of video footage shall not be released to the public in the absence of express written
permission from the non-law enforcement subject(s) of the video footage:
(A) Video footage not subject to a minimum three (3) year retention period pursuant to
subsection (j); and
(B) Video footage that is subject to a minimum three (3) year retention period solely
and exclusively pursuant to subsection (j)(1)(B) or (j)(2).

(2)

Notwithstanding any time periods established for acknowledging and responding to records
requests in [NAME OF STATE OPEN RECORDS ACT/FOIA LAW], responses to
requests for video footage that is subject to a minimum three (3) year retention period
pursuant to subsection (j)(1)(A), where a subject of the video footage is recorded being
killed, shot by a firearm, or grievously injured, shall be prioritized and the requested video
footage shall be provided as expeditiously as possible, but in no circumstances later than
five (5) days following receipt of the request.

(3)

Whenever doing so is necessary to protect personal privacy, the right to a fair trial, the
5
Page 59 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

identity of a confidential source or crime victim, or the life or physical safety of any
person appearing in video footage, redaction technology may be used to obscure the face
and other personally identifying characteristics of that person, including the tone of the
person’s voice, provided the redaction does not interfere with a viewer’s ability to fully,
completely, and accurately comprehend the events captured on the video footage.
(A) When redaction is performed on video footage pursuant to subsection (l)(3), an
unedited, original version of the video footage shall be retained pursuant to the
requirements of subsection (i) and (j).
(B) Except pursuant to the rules for the redaction of video footage set forth in
subsection (l)(3) or where it is otherwise expressly authorized by this Act, no other
editing or alteration of video footage, including a reduction of the video footage’s
resolution, shall be permitted.
(4)

The provisions governing the production of body camera video footage to the public in
this Act shall take precedence over all other state and local laws, rules, and regulations to
the contrary.

(m)

Body camera video footage may not be withheld from the public on the basis that it is an
investigatory record or was compiled for law enforcement purposes where any person under
investigation or whose conduct is under review is a police officer or other law enforcement
employee and the video footage relates to that person’s on-the-job conduct.

(n)

Any video footage retained beyond six (6) months solely and exclusively pursuant to
subsection (j)(2)(D) shall not be admissible as evidence in any criminal or civil legal or
administrative proceeding.

(o)

No government agency or official, or law enforcement agency, officer, or official may publicly
disclose, release, or share body camera video footage unless:
(1)

Doing so is expressly authorized pursuant to this Act or another applicable law; or
6
Page 60 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

(2)

The video footage is subject to public release pursuant to subsection (l), and not
exempted from public release pursuant to subsection (l)(1).

(p)

No law enforcement officer shall review or receive an accounting of any body camera video
footage that is subject to a minimum three (3) year retention period pursuant to subsection (j)(1)
prior to completing any required initial reports, statements, and interviews regarding the
recorded event, unless doing so is necessary, while in the field, to address an immediate threat
to life or safety.

(q)

Video footage that is not subject to a minimum three (3) year retention period shall not be viewed
by any superior officer of a law enforcement officer whose body camera recorded the footage
absent a specific allegation of misconduct.

(r)

No video footage shall be subjected to facial recognition or any other form of biometric analysis.
No video footage shall be subjected to any other form of automated analysis or analytics unless:
(A) A judicial warrant providing authorization is obtained;
(B) The judicial warrant specifies the precise, previously-recorded video recording to
which the authorization applies;
(C) The authorizing court finds there is probable cause to believe the video footage
contains evidence that is relevant to an ongoing felony criminal investigation; and
(D) The judicial warrant is consistent with the prohibitions contained in Section 1(g) of
this Act.

(s)

Video footage shall not be divulged or used by any law enforcement agency for any commercial
or other non-law enforcement purpose.

(t)

Where a law enforcement agency authorizes a third-party to act as its agent in maintaining body
camera footage, the agent shall not be permitted to independently access, view, or alter any video
footage, except to delete videos as required by law or agency retention policies.

(u)

Should any law enforcement officer, employee, or agent fail to adhere to the recording or retention
7
Page 61 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

requirements contained in this chapter, intentionally interfere with a body camera’s ability to
accurately capture video footage, or otherwise manipulate the video footage captured by a body
camera during or after its operation:
(1)

Appropriate disciplinary action shall be taken against the individual officer, employee or
agent;

(2)

A rebuttable evidentiary presumption shall be adopted in favor of criminal defendants who
reasonably assert that exculpatory evidence was destroyed or not captured; and

(3)

A rebuttable evidentiary presumption shall be adopted on behalf of civil plaintiffs suing the
government, a law enforcement agency and/or law enforcement officers for damages based
on police misconduct who reasonably assert that evidence supporting their claim was
destroyed or not captured.

(v)

The disciplinary action requirement and rebuttable presumptions in subsection (t) may be
overcome by contrary evidence or proof of exigent circumstances that made compliance
impossible.

(w)

Whenever a law enforcement officer equipped with a body camera is involved in, a
witness to, or within viewable sight range of either a police use of force that results in a
death, a police use of force where the discharge of a firearm results in an injury, or any
law enforcement officer conduct that becomes the subject of a criminal investigation:
(1)

Such officer’s body camera shall be immediately seized by the officer’s agency or
department, or the agency or department conducting the related criminal
investigation, and maintained in accordance with the rules governing the
preservation of evidence;

(2)

All data on the seized body camera shall be maintained in accordance with the
rules governing the preservation of evidence; and
8
Page 62 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

(3)

A copy of the data on the seized body camera shall made in accordance with
prevailing forensic standards for data collection and reproduction and shall be
made available to the public where required pursuant to Section 1(l) of this Act.

(x)

Any body camera video footage recorded in contravention of this Act or any other
applicable law may not be offered as evidence by any government entity, agency,
department, prosecutorial office, or any other subdivision thereof in any criminal or civil
action or proceeding against any member of the public.

(y)

Any law enforcement policy or other guidance regarding body cameras, their use, or the
video footage therefrom that is adopted by a state, county, or local government entity or
agency, including any police or sheriff’s department, shall be made publicly available
on that entity’s or agency’s website.

(z)

Nothing in this chapter shall be read to contravene any laws governing the maintenance,
production, and destruction of evidence in criminal investigations and prosecutions.

(aa)

As used in this Act:
(1)

“Law enforcement officer” shall mean any person authorized by law to conduct
searches and effectuate arrests and who is employed by the state, by a state
subsidiary, or by a county, municipal, or metropolitan form of government.

(2)

“Subject of the video footage” shall mean any identifiable law enforcement officer
or any identifiable suspect, victim, detainee, conversant, injured party, or other
similarly situated person who appears on the body camera recording, and shall not
include people who only incidentally appear on the recording.

(3)

“Use of force” shall mean any action by a law enforcement officer that (A) results
in death, injury, complaint of injury, or complaint of pain that persists beyond the
use of a physical control hold, or (B) involves the use of a weapon, including a
9
Page 63 of 76

Version 3.0 (October 2020)

personal body weapon, chemical agent, impact weapon, extended range impact
weapon, sonic weapon, sensory weapon, conducted energy device, or firearm,
against a member of the public, or (C) involves any intentional pointing of a
firearm at a member of the public.
(4)

“Video footage” shall mean any images or audio recorded by a body camera.

SECTION 2. This Act shall take effect [DATE]

10
Page 64 of 76

Agenda Bill
AB # 26-044

TO:

Mayor Thompson and Members of the City Council

FROM:

Becky Range, Assistant City Manager
Ken Seuberlich, Police Chief

DATE:

March 17, 2026

SUBJECT:

Immigrant Safety and Support

COUNCIL ACTION:
No action is requested. Staff are providing an update and seeking Council feedback. Key
questions staff are seeking feedback on:
•
•

Does Council support moving forward with the imminent measures outlined below to
better support community preparedness?
Are there any measures or actions we did not discuss tonight, either imminent or
undergoing study, that we should add to the matrix for evaluation?

HISTORY:
Date Action
Washington State Legislature passed the “Keep Washington Working”
Act which restricted local law enforcement and State agencies from
May 21, 2019
engaging in federal civil immigration enforcement, aiming to protect
the rights of all residents
Bothell City Council adopted the “2040 City Council Vision”
March 7, 2023 committing to fostering a community where everyone experiences a
sense of safety, belovedness, and belonging
February 18, 2025

Council adopted Resolution 1580 Reaffirming its Commitment to
Building a Safe, Welcoming, and Equitable Community For All

Page 65 of 76

Council adopted Resolution 1692 Affirming Bothell’s Support for
December 2, 2025 Immigrants and Endorsing State Laws that Promote Dignity, Safety,
and Equity
February 10, 2026

City staff provided an update to Council on Automated License Plate
Readers (ALPRs) and data collection policies

Council formed “Community Safety Subcommittee” and directed staff
February 10, 2026 to study potential measures regarding resident safety and support
during federal immigration enforcement activities
Staff presented potential measures to the Community Safety
Subcommittee outlining current city actions, proposed options for
March 5, 2026
future actions, and an analysis of approaches under consideration or
already implemented in the region
BACKGROUND:
The Bothell City Council Vision, “Building Bothell’s Beloved Community” seeks to ensure all
Bothell community members experience a sense of safety, belovedness, and belonging, and
that the city is a place where residents experience a sense of wellbeing and security.
Furthermore, the Council’s vision of “A Community of Trust and Respect” describes Bothell as a
city where all residents are neighbors and all neighbors are welcome.
In recent months, community members have shared concerns related to anticipated increased
federal enforcement activities in North King and South Snohomish Counties. Immigration
enforcement tactics across the nation continue to create fear, erode trust, and threaten the
well-being of communities. As anxiety and fear about the presence of federal agents in the
community grows, Council directed staff to study potential measures to ensure community
safety and support.
Keep Washington Working Act, 2019
In 2019, the Washington State Legislature enacted the “Keep Washington Working” (KWW) Act
which established a statewide policy supporting Washington State’s economy and immigrants’
role in the workplace. The City of Bothell and Bothell Police Department are committed to
upholding KWW and work to ensure all city policies, actions, and programs are in compliance
with the law.
Key Requirements of the Keep Washington Working Act
• State agencies, including law enforcement, must not use local resources (agency funds,
facilities, property, or personnel) to investigate, enforce, cooperate with, or assist in the
enforcement of any policies that target Washington residents solely based on race,
religion, immigration or citizenship.

Page 66 of 76

•
•
•

Local law enforcement agencies must not inquire into or collect information about an
individual’s immigration or citizenship status unless directly connected to a criminal
investigation or otherwise required by law.
State and local law enforcement agencies may not provide nonpublic available personal
information to federal immigration authorities, in noncriminal matters except as
required by state or federal law.
An individual may not be detained solely for the purpose of determining immigration
status.

City of Bothell Resolution 1692
In December 2025, Bothell City Council adopted a resolution affirming support for immigrants
and endorsing State laws that promote dignity, safety and equality. The City of Bothell
committed to the following:
• Reaffirming support for Washington State Law which prohibits use of local resources to
enforce or assist in the enforcement of any policies that target Washington residents
solely based on race, religion, immigration or citizenship status
• Expanding support for local organizations providing immigrant legal assistance, refugee
resettlement support, social services, and emergency resources.
• Collaborating with community partners to actively foster an understanding of the laws
and distribute multilingual “Know Your Rights” materials and resources.
• Supporting the enactment of additional state laws that address the concerns of the
community and further commitment to equality, safety, and justice for all residents.
• Protecting the privacy and data integrity of its community members and continuing to
evaluate its data and technology gathering policy.
DISCUSSION:
Current Landscape and Conditions
Following the Council’s adoption of the resolution, city staff have met and consulted with
regional non-profits, staff from other regional jurisdictions, and community partners, including
the North Urban Human Services Alliance, Consejo Counseling, Centro Cultural Mexicano, and
Safe Haven, an eastside coalition of over 30 regional non-profits providing direct services to
individuals and families impacted by federal immigration enforcement activities. Staff are also
engaged with local volunteer groups and are revising published resources and educational
materials based on community feedback and needs.
During the February 10 City Council meeting, Council directed staff to review all potential
measures and actions, including approaches implemented by regional jurisdictions related to
community support and safety.
In a recent Council Community Safety subcommittee meeting on March 5, Deputy Mayor
Alderks, Councilmember Al-Kabra, and Councilmember Dodd discussed a comprehensive list of

Page 67 of 76

various measures and actions that could be taken to support immigrant communities and
growing community resource and volunteer efforts in Bothell.
When considering current conditions and enforcement activity in our community, there was
general agreement to continue investments in community resources, potentially expand efforts
for organizations serving affected immigrants, and play a larger role in organizing overlapping
hyperlocal volunteer efforts. The following community building and employer actions could
likely be expanded or implemented if directed by Council.
CURRENT OR IMMINENT AREAS OF FOCUS:
Community Preparedness
• Continued engagement, sharing of Know Your Rights info: The subcommittee discussed
providing increased support to community members through ongoing community
engagement and information sharing. Potential strategies for community education may
include continued outreach and engagement with residents and community-based
organizations, distribution of Know Your Rights materials to increase awareness of legal
protections and available resources.
•

Criteria for in-cycle grants: In Resolution 1692, the Council committed to expanding
support for organizations serving the immigrant community. Consistent with this
direction, the subcommittee discussed the inclusion of immigrant community support
and services as a criterion for human services grant funding. The City of Bothell is
accepting human services grant funding applications for the 2027-2028 biennium from
March 2, 2026, to Apri 6, 2026.

•

Rapid Response Fund: Several cities provided rapid response funding to support
individuals and families directly impacted by immigration enforcement activities. Area
examples:
o The City of Kirkland approved $166,289 in additional one-time funding for agency
programming and services that support City of Kirkland immigrant, refugee, and
asylum-seeking community members in response to federal policy changes.
o The City of Seattle partnered with eight community-based organizations
to provide urgent, culturally responsive support including: legal consultations,
Know Your Rights Trainings, Immigrant Safety Planning, deportation defense
hotlines and policy information sessions.
o The City of Redmond allocated $250,000 from their “Community Stability Fund”
to distribute one-time grants to organizations that already receive city humanservices funding and to allow subcontracting arrangements so community groups
that did not secure a regular contract this year can participate (for example, by
providing legal clinics or Know Your Rights trainings).

•

Support for Community and Volunteer Efforts: As service providers work to increase
services for immigrants and families, volunteer management and a unified approach for

Page 68 of 76

service delivery is becoming more important. In addition to direct support for service
providers, staff is exploring ways to align immigrant services on the northside. This could
be more targeted support for volunteer organization or resources needed to implement
a northside immigrant provider coalition.
Policy and Legislation
• Staff continue to review and adopt data technology (including ALPR) policies to protect
personal data. All contracts undergo extensive legal review, and templates are being
reviewed and updated to address data protection. After initial policy reviews, staff have
also started a comprehensive review of public ROW and public space use permit
processes as it relates to technology and law enforcement.
•

Staff also continues to work with our local lobbyist to track and influence any legislation
at the Washington State Legislature that aligns with Council vision and supports our
immigrant communities.

Employer Actions
• Bothell Police currently dispatch officers to any report of unbadged agents to verify their
identity and legal authority. It is also standard practice to distinguish between internal
administrative documents and judicial warrants. City staff and Bothell Police do not grant
access to non-public areas based on administrative warrants (e.g., DHS Form I-200 or I205), which lack judicial review. Access is only granted upon presentation of a valid
judicial warrant.
• Staff are currently reviewing internal guidance and staff FAQs related to roles and
immigration enforcement, to ensure compliance with state law and reinforce training on
enforcement notification protocols beyond the Police Department.
NEXT AREA OF FOCUS:
Public Spaces and Facilities
With community building and ongoing preparedness efforts, it will be important to monitor
community anxiety levels, verified enforcement activity, and increasing engagement of
volunteer and advocacy groups with law enforcement. Several measures were discussed in the
subcommittee meeting as potential actions as conditions change. These include Immigration
Enforcement Free Zones, Constitutional Protection Zones, restricted use of city-owned or
managed properties, and restrictions or bans on detention facilities. All these measures are
currently being studied, undergoing further legal review, risk assessment, and insurance review.
These can be seen in more detail in Attachment 1.

Page 69 of 76

POLICY CONSIDERATION:
Council Vision 2040 area “Building Bothell’s Beloved Community” calls for actions to
help ensure everyone in Bothell experiences a sense of safety, belovedness, and
belonging. Additionally, the Council’s vision of “A Community of Trust and Respect” describes
Bothell as a city where all residents are neighbors and all neighbors are welcome.
FISCAL IMPACT
No current fiscal impact. Fiscal impact of any new or expiring programs will be considered
during the 2027-2028 budget development process.
ATTACHMENTS:
Att-1 Immigrant Support and Safety Policy Matrix
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action is requested. Staff are providing an update and seeking Council feedback. Key
questions staff are seeking feedback on:
•
•

Does Council support moving forward with the imminent measures outlined below to
better support community preparedness?
Are there any measures or actions we did not discuss tonight, either imminent or
undergoing study, that we should add to the matrix for evaluation?

Page 70 of 76

Community Preparedness – Education/Support
1.

2.

Action

Current Practice

Examples

Community education on family safety
plan, Know Your Rights, warrant
identification

Currently partnering with CBOs to disseminate info, host
workshops and training

City of Shoreline
City of Everett
City of Seattle

Expand funding for community-based
organizations helping immigrant
families (family assistance, legal aid)

Have added immigrant support as a priority for funding in
upcoming human services grant cycle

Improve the “how” -

Potential Practice
Provide Rapid Response Funding to
organizations

Provide out-of-cycle funding to those working with
individuals and families directly impacted by immigration
enforcement

4.

Foster volunteer organization/alignment

Funding or other efforts to foster Safe Haven model on
northside, could include funding of community organizer to
align efforts, organize leader meetings, publish volunteer
efforts

Page 71 of 76

3.

Co-host meetings, assist with printing, supplies

City of Kirkland
City of Seattle
City of Redmond
King County Exec. Order

1

Community Preparedness - Response
5

Action

Current Practice

Examples

Establish a "Verification of Authority" Dispatch Protocol
(Petition from 02/10 council meeting)

BPD currently dispatches officers to
any report of unbadged agents to
verify their identity and
legal authority.

King County Exec Order
(KC Exec. directs KC
Sheriff to develop
guidance by March 16)

6. Enforce the "Judicial Warrant" Standard
(Petition from 02/10 council meeting)

City distinguishes between internal
administrative documents and judicial
warrants. City staff and BPD do not
grant access to non-public areas based
on administrative warrants (e.g., DHS
Form I-200 or I-205), which lack judicial
review. Access only granted upon
presentation of a valid judicial warrant.

Page 72 of 76

2

Public Spaces and Facilities (1/2)

Page 73 of 76

Action

Potential Practice

Examples

7.

Comprehensive review of public ROW and public
space use processes as it relates to technology and
law enforcement

Review current permit or other requirements
for placing cameras, including automated
license plate readers (ALPRs), in public ROW,
on public property, and in public spaces

8

“Immigration Enforcement Free Zone” Ordinance
(Petition from 02/10 council meeting)

Prohibit civil immigration enforcement
activities in the non-public areas of city
owned and controlled buildings or properties
(unless required by law)

King County Executive
Order
City of Seattle
City of Spokane
City of Everett

9.

Post Signage on applicable city property (Petition
from 02/10 council meeting)

Create clear signage that can be posted on
applicable City property stating: “This
property is owned and controlled by the City
of Bothell. It shall not be used for civil
immigration enforcement staging, operations,
or processing.” (Petition includes parks,
parking lots, and plazas)

City of Seattle

3

Public Spaces and Facilities (2/2)

Page 74 of 76

Action

Potential Practice

Examples

10.

Designate “Constitutional Protection Zones” (Petition from
02/10 council meeting)

Designate Police and Fire Departments
(Court?) as Constitutional Protection
Zones. Within these zones, the City
guarantees that no custody transfer to
federal agents will occur without a
valid judicial warrant signed by a judge

11

Temporary moratorium prohibiting new or expanded
detention facilities

Enact a temporary land use
moratorium that would prohibit the
creation of new, or expansion of
detention uses within the City

City of SeaTac
City of Tukwila
City of Seattle

12

Prohibit use of private property for detention facilities

restrict private property owners from
leasing to DHS, ICE, or other entities
for detention purposes in commercial,
industrial, and residential zones across
the city.

City of Spokane

4

Policy and Legislation
Action

Current Practice

13

Continue to review and adopt data, technology (including
ALPR) policies to protect personal data

Follow WA State Records Retention
requirements. Follow local tech/surveillance
policy with focus on accountability and civil
liberties. All contracts undergo extensive legal
review.

14

Influence legislation

Currently advocate and follow legislation at
the Washington State Legislature for legislation
that aligns with vision and strategic priorities

Examples

Potential Practice
15

Review and reinforce city ordinance or safety policies

Page 75 of 76

Local law enforcement officers intervene when City of Lynnwood
federal agents use excessive force
consideration)

5

Employer Actions
16

Action

Current Practices

Examples

Clear employee roles and actions

City departments to reviewing/updating internal guidance
and FAQs related to immigration enforcement, ensure
compliance with state law and provide training on
enforcement notification protocols

City of Everett
City of Kirkland
City of Redmond
Port of Seattle
City of Hillsboro
City of Mount
Lake Terrace

Potential Practice

Page 76 of 76

17

Clear Procedures for Non-public city-owned
facilities use and access

18

Prohibit all city staff from sharing non-public information
Ordinance prohibiting ALL city employees from
sharing non-public information with immigration ( home addresses, etc) with immigration enforcement
enforcement officers
officers, unless required by law

Develop policies and signage for non-public, city-owned
areas, provide training for City staff on appropriate
facility use and federal access to non-public city-owned
spaces (example: City Hall offices or work zones)

City of Seattle
King County
City of Hillsboro
City of Seattle

6