On the agenda: Henrico Regular Meeting Minutes September 8 — Flock camera (Sep 8)

County of Henrico, Virginia
Board of Supervisors
Regular Meeting
September 8, 2026
The Henrico County Board of Supervisors convened a regular meeting on Tuesday,
September 8, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Board Room, Admjnistration Building, Henrico County
Government Center, Parham and Hungary Spring Roads, Henrico County, Virginia.
Members of the Board Present:
Roscoe D. Cooper, 111, Chair, Fairfield District
Misty D. Roundtree, Vice-Chair, Three Chopt District
Daniel J. Schmitt, Brookland District
Jody K. Itogish, Tuckahoe District
Tyrone E. Nelson, Varina District
Other Officials Present:
John A. Vithoullças, County Manager
Andrew R. Newby, County Attorney
Jackson P.F. Baynard, Deputy County Manager for Public Safety
Tanya N. Brackett, CMC, Assistant to the County Manager/Clerk to the Board
W. Brandon Hinton, Deputy County Manager for Adininistration
Monica Smith-Callahan, Deputy County Manager for Community Affairs
Steven J. Yob, Deputy County Manager for Community Operations
Ben Sheppard, Director of Communications
Rabbi Cristina Ramirez of Congregation Or Atid delivered the invocation.
On motion of Mrs. Roundtree, seconded by Mr. Nelson, the Board approved the minutes of
the August 25, 2026, Regular and Special Meetings.
The vote of the Board was as follows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson
No:

None

Reconition ofNews Media
Mr. Cooper recognized Deniel Dookan with WRIC TV-8.
Manaers Comments
There were no comments from the Manager.

Board ofSupervisors Comments
Mr. Rogish announced the passing ofjoseph Joe Betzala. Mr. Betzala was a life member of
the Tuckahoe Rescue Squad and was active in his community. Mr. Rogish offered prayers
and condolences to the family.
lic HearinEs - RezoninE Cases and Provisional Use Permits

AEenda Item
96-26
PtJP-2026100022
Brookland

Spy Rock Real Estate Group: Request for a Provisional Use Permit
under Sections 24-2306 and 24-3708 of Chapter 24 of the County Code
to allow a mixed-use development with multifamily residential on Parcel
776-736-7233 located at the southeast intersection of Westmoreland
Street and Jacque Street.
Mr. vithoulkas announced a deferral of this item has been requested by
the applicant to the October 13, 2026, meeting.
Jim Hawes, a resident of the Brookland District, spoke on behalf of his
familys tbird generation business located on Jacque Street. Mr. Hawes
remarks were prefaced with the statement that he is not opposed to
responsible development which takes into account business and
customer needs. He emphasized his desire that the County and
Planning staff do its due diligence when considering this case. Concerns
include the number ofresidential projects currently in planning stages,
the increase in services and infrastructure to meet demand, and
particujarly the increased density in an industrial area.
Mr. Schmitt stated he supports deferral of the case. He addressed
speaker concerns and provided a case update which included meetings
with the applicant to address additional concerns. He made clear that
the Board looks at traffic studies and school impacts when considering
a case and assured everyone that the County does its due diligence. To
take advantage of the deferral and to use time wisely, next steps include
meeting with Planning staff and follow-up meetings with businesses
and provide quality mixed-use developments that County residents
desjre.
On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous
vot, the Board deferred this item to the October 13, 2026, meeting.
The vote of the Board was as follows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson
No:

179-26
REZ-2026100545
Varina

None

Beckley Bluford Investment, LLC: Request to rezone from C-1
Conservation District to A-1 Agricultural District on part of Parcel 832727-2459 containing 26.4 acres located on the east line of Beckley Road
approximately 300 west of its inthrsection with Beverstone Road.

Seth Humphreys responded to questions from Mr. Nelson regarthng the
previous request for this development; clarifying the original case was
deriied based on the amount of homes and it was listed as R-5A and
wanted to rezone to c-1. He noted both cases wee denied, but he
recalled that some of the land is A-1 and knew there was a possibility
the developer would conie back with a new development.
Mr. Nelson requested clarification on the line drawn on the development
for the floodplain and conservation area.
Andy Condlin, on behalf of the applicant, noted the request is to take it
to A-1, and the development would not be in the floodplain area. He
shared the prior plat on the land and showed how the line was drawn to
determine the floodplain area. The applicant is requesting the
development be A-1 with 1 acre lots as the residents voiced concerns
about the prior ease and noted they just want to be A-1 which is
appropriate for the Varina area and it is not in the floodplain area. He
estimates they will be able to get about 20 lots on the front portion and
10 lots on the back for a total of 30 lots.
The following individuals spoke regarthng this item:
Sarah LaPoint, a resident of the Varina District, voiced concerns
about the run-off from the stormwater for this development and
the impact it will have on the surrounding property owners with
issues with their well water and the concerns with flooding on
their properties they already experience. She also noted the
conservation area and the importance of maintaining the
conservation.
Adam Collett, a resident of the Varina District, voiced concerns
about the parcel and noting it is unable to be rezoned, and it stffl
should be C-1 zoning which will protect Henricos natural
resources including the floodplains. He a180 expressed concerns
the development would have financial harm on him and his
family with the increase in property tax and requested the Board
not rezone the parcel.
Ricky Whit, a resident of the Varina District, voiced concerns
about the impact this development will have on the surrounding
community with their well water and the runoff from the
stormwater. He also raised concerns about swamp pink growing
on the development and noted in our newly approved
Comprehensive Plan C-1 exists to protect the floodplain and
natural resources. He requested the Board reconsider the
approval of this development.
•

Elmer Hutchins, a resident ofthe Varina District, also voiced the
concerns ofthe prior speaker and noted the water flows down and
there is no elevation for the water to flow to except to the existing

homeowners. He also noted he had over 200 signatures on a
petition from the community who are in opposition of this
development.
At the request ofMr. Ne18on, Mr. Condlin addressed the concerns voiced
by the resident and noted our Public Works Department has confirmed
the development is not in the floodplain. He also noted the property
owner has already applied for and awaiting confirmation for a stream
restoration nutrient bank — very first one privately funded in the
commonwealth of Virginia and requested the Board treat the property
as in any other development and approve the request.
Terrell Hughes, Director of Public Works, regarding the floodplain
concerns, he noted during the plan of development process it includes
adopting the floodplains and noted what is currently shown is not in the
floodplain and FEMA has since updated their maps to reflect this, and
that is what governs the floodplain.
Bentley Chan, Director of Public Utffities, responded to the concerns of
PFAS in the wells; explained there are wells that have tested positive
for PFAS and they have provided free filters systems for these homes
and noted testing for PFAS and the fflters are offered free through the
County.
Steve Yob, Deputy County Manager for Community Operations,
responded to the concern of swap pink growing in the area and noted he
is not aware of any in this area.
Mr. Nelson stated respectfully to the community when the case came
forward last year, the issue was density in the area and he voted against
the property but noted we knew the case would come back in a different
form and in order to be sure he wffl get clarity on the impact ofthe wells
in the communìty, verify if there is swap pink growing in the area. He
requested Mr. Chan to review the PFAS in this community and around
the development and requested staff to review the swamp pink and
verify it is not in the area; particularly at the level the federal
government does when researching the area and conservation. He
explained he denied the case last year based on what he heard from the
residents, the concerns with the density anð now he is hearing the
community just doesnt want development or new neighbors.
Mr. Chan responded to a question from Mr. Rogish regarthng the pump
station in the area and the capacity it would be able to take on. Noted
he will get the answers to these concerns for both him and Mr. Nelson.
Andrew Newby, County Attorney, clari.fled for Mr. Nelson and the
residents that the case would come back for decision only meaning the
public hearing is closed on this item. The Board will not hear any public
comments at the October 13 meeting. The public is welcome to email

their concerns up until the meeting, and they will be included in the
official minutes.
On motion of Mr. Nelson, seconded by Mr. Schmitt, and by unanimous
vote, the Board deferred this item to the October 13, 2026, meeting for
decision only.
The vote of the Board was as foUows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson

155-26
REZ-2026100676
Fairfield

Imago Dei School: Request to conditionally rezone from M-2 General
lndustrial District to R-4C One-Family Residence District (Conditional)
on part of Parcel 799-733-1982 containing 8.86 acres located at the
southeast intersection of DiU Road and Vawter Avenue.
Anne Neil Cosby, with McGuire Woods on behal.f of the applicant, noted
at the last meeting there were questions regarding the module units.
She noted they have submitted revised proffers and hopes they have
addressed all the concerns.
Ms. Molly Mallow with the Planning Department responded to a
question from Mr. Rogish regarding the current zoning al]ows for the
development to be a board school, but the applicant has prohibited the
use in their proffers.
At the request of Mr. Cooper, Ms. Ma1low explained in the updated
proffers they are proposing some native planting.
No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous
vote, the Board foflowed the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approved this item with the following conthtions:
1. Permitted Uses. M1 uses permitted in the R-4 district shaU be
permitted except for the following:
a. single-family dweffings
b. Group home
c. Childrens residential facility
d. Government offices
e. Police, fire, or EMS facffity
f. Publicpark
g. Parks and open areas not specified elsewhere
h. Utility, major
i. Golf course
j. Bed and breakfast inn

2. The temporary prefabricated building (the «Temporary Building)
shall be located on the Property in either the area identified on the
Conceptual Site Plan as option-1 or as option-2 attached hereth
(8ee case flle) and made part of these proffers. Landscaping shall
be installed around the foundation of the Temporary Builcling as
approved by the Planning Director during the Temporary Use
Permit process.
3. The existing stormwater pond located on the Property shall be
secured with a safety fence. Prior to the issuance of the certificate
of occupancy for the Temporary Builthng the safety fence shall be
in place. If the County determines that the existìng fence is
sufficient to provide security, it may remain on the Property. Ifnot,
any new fence shall meet the design criteria for safety fences as
provided in the Virginia Sthrmwater Management Handbook.
4. As part of a plan of development (the POD) for construction of any
permanent structure on the Property, the Owner/Applicant will,
where practical, implement post-development measures to protect
the natural resources of the Property incluthng but not limited to:
a. Planting native, non-invasive landscaping on the
Property along buffer and common areas
b. Incorporate native plants for landscaping around builthng
entrances, in student gardens, and in parking islands
c. Use vegetation to shade HVAC units
d. Use bioretention areas, rain gardens, bioswales,
permeable pavement, or other infiltration practices
e. Install high-branching canopy trees around play areas to
reduce heat and support wildlife biodiversity while
providing sight lines to play areas
f. Preserve existing mature trees on the Property during
development, to the extent practical
5. Prior to flling the flnal POD, the OwnerfApplicant shall apply to
rezone such portions of the Property situated within the 100-year
floodplainlspecial flood hazard area to a C-1 Conservation District.
The location and limits of such portions of the Property shall be
established by definitive surveys approved by the Department of
Public Works.
The vote of the Board was as follows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson
No:

None
6

180-26
PUP-2026100750
Vathia

Whitehead & Chiocca Properties, LLC: Request for a Provisional Use
Permit under Sections 24-2306 and 24-4315.D of Chapter 24 of the
County Code to allow an indoor event venue on part of Parcel 818-7257584 located on the south line of Nine Mile Road approximately 400 east
of its intersection with Newbridge Road.
Ms. Mallow clarified for Mr. Nelson one of the updated conditions is the
hours ofoperations and for anyone attending an event under the age of 18
would be required to submit identiflcation and an off-duty police officer or
security officer would have to be onsite for all after-hour events.
Lois Lewis-Jolley, the owner of the property, noted she has several
business on the Nine Mile Road corridor anð noted they also host nonprofit events at this facility and thanked the staff, Board and everybody
who have helped get the event space up to date and ensuring they are good
neighbors. She also noted she handles all the balloons r events for the
County, noting that her family has serviced this neighborhood and this
community for over 20 years and wants to make sure they continue to do
so safely and in compliance.
No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
On motion ofMr. Nelson, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous vote,
the Board followed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and
approved this item with the following conditions:
This provisional use permit will only allow the foUowing:
a. A private reception and event venue
i. Operating hours for events and private receptions with
unaccompanied minors (under 18 years old) wffl be
permitted only from 8:00 am to 10:00 pm. AII other events
wffl be permitted only from 8 am to midnight.
li. The owner or a representative of the owner must check all
identification cards to verify ages before individuals are
permitted into the business.
2. The owner or a representative of the owner must be on-site during
all hours ofoperation.
3.

Public dance halls, as defined in Section 24-8405 of the countys
Zoning Ordinance, are prohibited. No later than 60 days following
the approval of this Provisional Use Permit, the applicant must
satisfy the requirements of the Chief of Police regarding a dance
hall permit (see Section 4-63 of the County Code).

4. This permit on1y applies to the tenant space currently occupied by
Occasions Too! and shall not apply to any other business in the
overall shopping center. If additional space within the shopping
center is combined with the Occasions Too! business a new
provisional use permit would be needed.

IÅ

The installation of pay phones and the installation and operation of
skilled video games are prohibited.
6. The applicant/owner/operator must be responsible for the
installation, operation, and maintenance of a functioning security
camera and video system of professional grade and quality and
rated for surveillance of interior and exterior operations. The
security cameras must, at minimum, include:
a. Exterior surveiUance must monitor all entrance(s), parking
area(s), and other areas deemed necessary by the Crime
Prevention Unit of the Division of Police. Such security cameras
must provide clear imagery of the establishments patrons and
their vehicles.
b. Recording of all activities under survefflance must be preserved
for a period of one (1) month by the applicant or owner/operator.
Authorized representatives of the Henrico Police Division must
have full and complete access to all recordings upon request.
c. Exterior cameras must connect to Henrico Countys Real Time
Crime Center (Halo).
The applicantiowner/operator must provide adequate lighting for
the entrances, exits, and parking areas that service the use or
location. Adequate lighting means lighting sufficient for clear
sight, visual identification of individuals, and useful for security
camera surveillance without infrared enhanceznent.
8. The owner or operator must not permit loitering on the premi8e5
during hours of operation and all patrons must leave the premises
and parking areas immediately after the close of business.
9. Prior to operation, the applicantiowner/operator shall submit a
paper and digital copy of a Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) Plan for review and approval by
the Chief of Police. The CPTED Plan must contain the information
below.
a. Standard operating procedures pertaining to employees, facility
security, security personnel and all other crime prevention
measures (incluthng: a security alarm, placement and views of
interior anð exterior security cameras, physical security
measures (door locks, hinges, access control (ex. keycard access)),
landscaping, lighting, etc., and describes how the CPTED Plan is
designed to reðuce crime from occurring during hours of
operation.

b. Trespassing enforcement authorization for the Henrico County
Police Division, including the placement of No Trespassing
signage.
c. Prior to operation, the applicant/owner/operator must meet with
the Henrico County Police Division to ensure security measures
are instafled and operating as described in the approved CPTED
plan.
10. Store windows must not be tinted or obscured by advertisements,
posters, blinds, and/or visual obstructions that inhibit or hinder
exterior surveillance.
11. This Provisional Use Permit shall expire on August 31, 2027. Prior
to its expiration, the applicant must apply for a new provisional use
permit 8ubject to a review of operations and compliance with these
conditions. Should evidence (i.e. phone calls to the premises,
complaints from other businesses, criminal assaults, narcotic or
firearm violations, etc.) or registered complaints (i.e. increased
public nuisance, loitering, excessive noise, etc.) prior to this ðate
indicate operation of the indoor recreation use is having aðverse
effects on the area, the Board of Supervisors may hold a public
hearing to consider revoking the PUP or amenthng all or some
conditions.
12. At least one (1) uniformed security officer who is license by Virginia
Departinent of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) or Henrico County
off-duty police officer shall be on duty during hours of operation.
The officer shall periothcally monitor the exterior of the premises as
well as the interior for possible criminal activity.
The vote of the Board was as follows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson
No:
198-26
REZ-2026100916
Fairfield

None

Imperia1 Investments Group LLC: Request to conthtionally rezone from
R-6O General Residence District (Conditional) and B-3 Business District
to B-3C Business District (conthtional) Parcels 784-760-2968 and 784760-2885 containing 2.202 acres located at the northeast intersection of
Mageflan Parkway and Brook Road (EJ.S. Route 1).
Kate Lafeytte, representing the applicant, noted the original request of
the rezoning to commercial use. They sent out information to the
surrounding community and explained they heard back from two
resiðents. After meeting with the Planning staff and the applicant, they
are proffering out intense uses based on the feedback from the neighbors
anð limiting the hours.

No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
Mr. Cooper thanked the applicant for the work on this case but noted he
stffl had 8everal questions regarding the redevelopment such as speciflc
uses for this property. He requested there be a stronger proffer to share
the intended use of this property and referenced the prior request that
had come forward for this parcel.
On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Mr. Nelson, and by unanimous
vote, the Board deferred this item to the October 13, 2026, meeting.
The vote of the Board was as follows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson
No:
199-26
REZ-2025102340
Varina

None

DRB 111 Trucking LLC: Request to conthtionally rezone from A-1
Agricultural District and B-3 Business District to M-2C General
Industria1 District (Conthtional) Parcels 815-699-6667 and 815-6998388 containing 5.938 acres located at the southeast intersection of
Darbytown Road and Miller Road.
Ben Sehl with the Planning Department clarified the staff
recommendation to the request noting staff was not opposed to the
proposal, [at the request of Mr. Nelson], Mr. Sehl explained staff
recognizes this property is in transition and noted staff is not in
objection to the case because they understand the owner is working to
make improvements. He also clarified the owner moves through the
complete plan ofdevelopment process because this gives staffthe ability
to work through buffering and other enhancements to the site and
ensure this occurs. He also gave an overview and history of the site.
Randy Hooker, representing the owner Donnie, noted he does own a
small trucking business and noted he did his due diligence with the
property by working with Planning when he decided to purchase the
property. He also agreed to connect to the utilities and the expense he
will incur by doing this. Donnie explained that the highest number of
trucks on the property are three trucks and 15 trailers. There is grass
in the back area with a smail garden. He explained he wffl do everything
they have requested in the proffers to ensure hi8 property is up to date.
No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
On motion of Mr. Nelson, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous
vote, the Board followed the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approved this item with the following conditions:

o

1.

Use Restrictions. Not more than 3,711 square feet of tloor area
may be used for storage, Bervice, repair and garage use. And, not
more than 1,515 square feet offloor area may be used for office use.
The following M-2 Use Categories shall not be permitted;
Agricultural Support and Services, Day Care, Educational Facilities,
Funeral and Mortuary Services, Government Facilities, Health Care
Facilities, Parks and Open Areas) Transportation, Utilities (other
than Communications), Adult Uses, Aniinal Care — Grooming,
Eating Establishments, Recreation and Entertainment Indoor,
Recreation and Entertainment Outdoor, Retail Sales and Services,
Visithr Accommodations, Extractive Industry, Industria1 Services,
Automobile filling station, Commercial fuel depot, Manufacturing
and Production, Warehouse and Freight Movement (other than
Mini-warehouse, Self-service sthrage facility and Outdoor storage)
and Waste Related Services.

2.

Bui1din Elevations. The siding material used on the buildings
shall be one or more of the following materials, (above fiiiish grade
and exclusive of trim): brick, brick veneer, parged concrete block,
glass, vinyl siding, architectural grade metal panels, unless different
architectural treatment and/or materials are speci&ally approved,
at the time of Plan of Development. The building elevations depict
existing features, as well as proposed (PRO.) improvements. The
building elevations are shown on plans titled, Office Building
Elevations, Garage Building Elevations and Service Garage
Building Elevations, dated March 17, 2026, last revised May 4, 2026,
by Engineering Design Associates, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto,
as Exhibits B C and D, (see case ffle).

3.

Landscaped Areas. A Transitional Buffer 50 and Transitional
Buffer 35 are shown across from Agricultural and Business zoned
properties. Additional evergreen plantings shall be provided to fill
void areas in the buffer as determined appropriate by the Director of
Planning at time of Landscape Plan review. The buffers are shown
on plan titled, Conceptual Layout Plan, dated November 8, 2024, and
revised on May 4, 2026, by Engineering Design Associates, a copy of
which is attached hereto, as Exhibit A, (see case ffle).
The aforesaid landscaped areas shou1d be provided to the extent of
the necessity for or allowance for utility easements, grading,
drainage, signage and access driveways and other purposes
requested and specifically permitted, or ifrequired at time ofPlan of
Development review. Any new utility easements or use permitted
within the aforesaid landscaped areas shou1d be extended generally
perpendicular to the landscaped areas unless otherwise requested
and speciflcally permitted or if required at the time of Plan of
Development review and, where permitted, areas disturbed for
utility installation shou1d be replanted to the extent reasonably
practicable.

4.

Screening. The outdoor storage area will be screened with a
combination of an opaque fence, existing vegetation and/or
adclitional evergreen Iandscaping. A 32 double Ieaf gate wffl be
provided at the entrance drive aisle. Ân interior 26 double leaf gate
wffl be provided at the entrance drive to the gravel storage lot. The
fencing is shown on plan titled, Conceptual Layout Plan, dated
November 8, 2024, and revised on May 4, 2026, by Engineering
Design Associates, a copy of which is attached hereto, as Exhibit A,
(see case ffle).

5.

Signage. Any freestanding sign wffl be monumental in style with
base materials consistent with the buildings on the property and not
exœed ten (10) feet in height, and iflighted, must be internally lit 80
that there are no freestanding spotlights or any type of individual
lighting structure. The sign message, if ffluminated, must be
ffluminated from within the sign structure. The only signage
permitted on the Property should be the aforementioned
freestanding sign(s) and the attached signage on the building
directional signs, and menu boards, all to the extent allowed by the
zoning ordinance.

6.

Loudspeakers. No outside pagers or loudspeakers wffl be
permitted on the Property.

7.

Hours of Construction. The hours of exterior eonstruction,
including operation ofbulldozers and other earthmoving equiprnent,
wffl be between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and 7:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, except in emergencies, or
where unusual circumstances require extending specific hours in
order to complete work such as concrete pours or utility connections.
Signs, in both English and Spanish, stating the above referenced
provisions must be posted and maintained at aJJ entrances to the
Property prior to any land disturbance activities thereon.

8.

Hours of Operation. The hours of operation for all uses of the
property wffl be between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm daily.

9.

Trash Pickup. Parking Lot CJeaning Leaf ßlowing. Trash
pickup, parking lot cleaning and leaf blowing on the property wffl be
limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to S:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday.

10. Severance. The unenforceability, elimination, revision, or
amendment of any proffer set forth herein, in whole or in part, wffl
not affect the validity or enforceability of any of the other proffers or
the unaffected part ofany such proffer.
11. Best Management Practice. Any permanently wet above-ground
Best Management Practice structure must include an aeration
feature to move water within such structure.
12

12. Underground Utilitv Lines. A11 utility lines on the Property will
be underground, except for existing utilities, junction boxes, meters,
utility lines in wetland areas and uti.lity lines required to be above
ground by the utility company.
13. Bui1din Finishes and Materials. The existing building finishes
of 2601 Darbytown Road consist of a combination of parged concrete
block and parged brick, the exterior accessed restrooms with metal
sithng and rooflng. The existing garage builthng finishes consist of
metal sithng and rooflng, with axed wooden doors and trim. A new
overhead metal door will be installed on the southern elevation.
Lean-to carports will be added to the eastern and western building
elevations.
The existing building flnishes of 2621 Darbytown Road consist of
brick and vinyl siding and asphalt shingle roof. Areas missing or
having damaged vinyi siding wffl receive similar materials.
14. Darbvtown Road and Miller Road Right-of-Wav Dedications.
Prior to any Plan of Development approval, right-of-way dedication
to the ultimate cross section of Darbytown Road and Miller Road
shalJ be dethcated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of
Henrico County. Should the dedicated property not be used for its
intended purpose within thirty (30) years of the date of dedication,
title to the dethcated property shall revert to the owner or its
successors in interest. The removal of the existing asphait, at the
southeastern corner of Darbytown Road and Miller Road, along the
frontage of 2601 Darbytown Road wffl be coordinated with Henrico
County ÐPW road improvements.
15. Sanitary Sewer. The existing sanitary sewer, in Darbytown Road,
will be extended, approximately 250 linear feet, from manhoie
#122NW202, to the eastern side of the intersection of Milier Road.
The existìng service (storage) building and the existing dwelling will
be connected to the sanitary sewer extension. Due to the depth of the
existing sanitary sewer, an exception will be required from Public
Utilities for the 5.5 minimum cover requirement.
16. Plan Apnrovals. To ensure all necessary site improvements are
compieted to fully satisfSr all open zoning violations, regulatory
requirements, and proffered conthtions, the owner/operator must flle
and receive approvaI ofa Plan ofDevelopment, including subsequent
construction plans and building permits for this property, and
construct them per the approved plans, prior to the issuance of a
business license and any related Certi.ficate(s) of Occupancy. Unless
otherwise determined by the Director of Planning, the Plan of
Development must inciude details reiated to iandscaping, lighting,
fencing, drainage, and building improvements.

13

The vote of the Board was as follows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson
No:

None

Aenda Item

Public Hearings —Other Items

200-26

Ordinance - To Amend and Reordain Section 22-43 Titled Reserved of
the Code of the County of Henrico to Allow the Use of Photo Speed
Monitoring Devices in Schoo] Crossing Zones.
Mrs. Roundtree revieweð the state code noting where these cameras are
allowed and we are only looking at cameras within certain school zones.
Lt. Matt Pecka with the Police Division responded to the timing when
the cameras would be in use, which is during the hours the lights are
flashing in the school speethng zones.
Mr. Nelson explained ifthere is a way to have the cameras in use during
the hours when there are highly attended after-hours events. He stated
there was a football game Friday night at Highland Springs and the
game was sold out so there were thousands of people in attendance and
after the game walldng across the street to their vehicles. He was
concerned watching people trying to get across Airport Drive.
Eric English, Chief of Police, explained they can work with their
partners at school t have the lights flashing during high attendance
after school events.
Mrs. Roundtree asked for clarification on how the tickets wffl be issued
and who will be validating the information. Lt. Pecka explained the
vendor wou1d veri the photo and checking it with the Department of
Motor Vehicles (DMV) and verifying the registration information and
then it would come to the Police Division to veri the information as
well before senthng out the ticket. She clari.fied what happens if the
inthvidual doesnt pay the fine or show for court. Lt. Pecka explained the
Division will have the option to do a DMV hold if the ticket isnt paid.
He also noted they wffl work with Public Relations to get the information
out to the community about the speed cameras and what to look for if
they receive a bffl.
Chief English also clarified they are not Flock cameras. The data wffl
only be used by the Police Division, wffl not be shared, and wffl only be
used for the purpose of speeding in a school zone when the lights are
flashing. There wffl be no third-party sharing and noted the plan is to
have aU the high schools with speed cameras and two middle schools,
Fairfleld and Tuckahoe, and the plan would be to include all schools.
Mr. Vithoutkas clarifled they have identified some schools that are in
neighborhoods that woulð not require the speed cameras.
4

Mrs. Roundtree also expressed concerns about the $100 fine and the
implications it eould have on an individual if presented with this ftne.
Chief English explained there are options they can look at regarding the
fee and noted if an officer were to stop you for speethng in a school zone
the implications and the fine would be much higher.
Mr. Schmitt explained he had no questions and felt the Board was fully
briefed during the work session. He is in full support of making sure
students are safe and safely cross the street and making sure
individuals are slowing down in a school zone and noted the County
doesnt have the resources to have police officers at every school or
having a crossing guard. He also noted protecting the data and inaking
sure this information is only with our local Poliee Division, and he
agreed with Mr. Nelson on activating the flashing lights during high
impact after-hour events. He applauded the work on getting the speed
cameras and feels airing on the side of protecting our residents in
crossing the street or in a school zone area.
Mr. Rogish requested the number of tickets that have been issued in a
school zone. Lt. Pecka noted in school year 23 it was 487; in 24 it was
700; in the current year and to date they have issued 355 tickets. Mr.
Rogish agreed with having the lights flashing during high impact events
and encouraged residents to read the code and get a complete
understanthng.
Mr. Nelson noted anything the County can do to deter speeding and
agrees with the $100 fine and feels it wffl deter speethng and requested
the Manager and the Chair to work with our school counterparts on
having the flashing lights on during high impact events.
The following individuals spoke regarding this item:
Victoria Crawley, a resident of the Fairfield District, noted she
supports acting in reducing speeding around our schools and
believes the cameras wffl help but doesnt feel it is enough
particularly on Azalea Avenue. She noted she has hours of video
footage documenting the speeding and drivers not stopping at the
crosswalk area and noted she spends hours helping students
cross the street. She noted they already have flashing
pedestrians lights and drivers ignore it, and instaffing the speed
cameras being insta]led but wants the Board to aetuaily look at
what else can be done to ensure safe pedestrians crossing and
requested the Board do an overview of all school zones and
requested a comprehensive safety assessment of the entire
Azalea Avenue corridor.
• Michael Keegan, a resident of the Three Chopt District,
questioned where the data wffl be stored, who wffl be using the
data, and what agencies wffl have access to the data and noted
Flock cameras.
15

Sarah Ram8ey, a resident of the Tuckahoe District, spoke via
Webex and voiced concerns about the data the cameras coilect
and how it wffl be used.
•

Katie Albright, a resident ofthe Varina District, spoke via Webex
and voiced concerns about Flock Cameras and where the data is
being used and stored and noted he lives on a state highway that
is not considered in a school zone.

Lt. Pecka clarified at the request of Mr. Cooper noting passing cars wffl
not be captured during a non-flashing light time zone. It would only be
capturing vehicles that are speeding in a school zone when the Jights are
flashing. He also clarified the information is not being stored in a huge
database that wffl be shared. It wffl only be seen and used by the Police
Division.
Mr. Nelson noted he understands the concerns about Flock cameras and
agree they do target more black and brown people but feels the speed
cameras are not Flock and will not be used as such.
Mrs. Roundtree wants to make sure we understand the difference
between Flock cameras and the speed cameras and doesnt want the two
to be combined and feels there is a need for a conversation about Flock
cameras, but this is not what the speed cameras are. The information
wffl not be used for improper purposes, and the information will only be
with our Police Division and made sure it covers the details of the
statute the code permits.
On motion of Mr. Schmitt, seconded by Mr. Nelson, and by unanimous
vote, the Board approved this item — see attached ordinance.
201-26

Resolution - Condemnation - Easements - Mount Olive Avenue
Realignment Project - 8825 Trolley Lane - Fairfield District.
No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Mr. Nelson, and by unanimous
vote, the Board approved this item — see attached resolution.

202-26

Resolution - Condemnation - Easements - Mount Olive Avenue
Realignment Project - 8831 Trolley Lane - Fairfield District.
No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
On motion of Mr. Cooper, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous
vote, the Board approved this item — see attached resolution.

183-26

Resolution - Declaration of surplus Property - Signatory Authority Conveyance - 2510 Hartman Street - Fairûeld District.
16

Mr. Vithoulkas noted this item was deferred from the Boards August 11,
2026, meeting.
No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
On motiori ofMr. Cooper, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous vote,
the Board deferred this item to the October 13, 2026, meeting — see
attached resolution.
The vote ofthe Board was as follows:
Yes: Cooper, Roundtree, Schmitt, Rogish, Nelson
No:
194-26

None

Ordinance - To Amend and Reordain Section 23-117 Titled Restricted
wastes, Section 23-118 Titled Reserved, Section 23-150 Titled
Violations, Section 23-154 Titled Applicability ofcategorical standards,
and Section 22-164 Titled Reserved ofthe Code ofthe County ofHenrico
to Update Maxùnum Discharge Limits, Establish Requirements for PFAS
Discharge Monitoring, and Conform to Federal Regulations.
Mr. Vithoulkas noted this item was deferred from the Boards August 25,
2026, meeting to aljow for the DEQ hearing. Bentley Chan, Director of
Public Utilities, noted the public hearing comment period has closed, and
there was no information or feedback from DEQ.
No one from the public spoke in opposition to this item.
On motion ofMrs. Roundtree, seconded by Mr. Nelson, and by unanimous
vote, the Board approved this item — see attached ordinance.

Public Conunents
Mary Morrissey, a resident of the Tuckahoe District, voiced concerns about HVAC systems
in the schools and requested the Board work with the School Board to find a solution to fix
the issues.
Rai Beasley, Phillip Jordan, and a member of Sixth Mount Zion Bapti8t Church requested
the presence of the Board at the 100 Men Chailenge on September 17 at Virginia Randolph
School.
Greg Kontos, a resident of the Tuckahoe District, requested the Board work with VDOT on
speed linits along Parham Road and Patterson Avenue.
Patrick Oxenham and members of the Lakeside community introduced themselves to the
Board and requested the Boards help in establishing the Lakeside Community Council.
Sarah Ramsey, a resident of the Tuckahoe District, spoke via Webex with concerns about
fluoride in the Countys water system.
17

Katie Albright, a resident of the Varina District, spoke via Webex with concerns about Flock
Cameras and requested the Board consider removing them.
Anda Item
203-26

General Aenda
Introduction of Resolution - Receipt of Requests for Amendments to
FY 2026-27 Annual Fiscal Plan - September 2026.

On motion of Mr. Nelson, seconded by Mr. Rogish, and by unanimous
vote, the Board approved this item — see attached introduction of
resolution.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:07 p.m.

Chair, Board o upervisors
Henrico County, Virginia

18