On the agenda: Eugene meeting — Flock camera (Sep 8)

City of Eugene

CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD
It is the mission of the Civilian Review Board to provide fair and impartial oversight and review of internal
investigations conducted by the City of Eugene Police Department involving allegations of police misconduct, use of
force and other matters. The Board will strive to build trust and confidence within the community and to ensure that
complaints are handled fairly, thoroughly and adjudicated reasonably. The Board will encourage community
involvement and transparency in order to promote the principles of community policing in the City of Eugene.

Civilian Review Board Meeting Agenda
Hybrid Meeting
Tuesday, September 8, 2026 – 5:30pm
Attend in Person: 101 East Broadway, Suite 230 Eugene, OR
Attend Via Webinar: https://eugene-or-gov.zoom.us/j/85842601607
Passcode: Sept26CRB
Accessibility: The meeting will be held virtually. For the hearing impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48
hours’ notice prior to the meeting. Se puede proveer interpretación al español con un aviso de 48 horas. To arrange
for these services / Para reservar estos servicios: 541-682-5016, [email protected].
A completed Request to Speak Form is required for providing Public Comment. Forms must be submitted by email
to [email protected] as early as 15 minutes before, but no later than 15 minutes after the meeting has
been called to order.

Item

Time (Starting)

1. Agenda and Materials Review

5 minutes (5:30pm)

2. Minutes Approval (Minutes from June meeting)

5 minutes (5:35pm)

3. Comments from Board Members and Commission Liaisons

10 minutes (5:40pm)

4. Training: Internal Affairs Process

15 minutes (5:50pm)

5. Break

5 minutes (6:05pm)

6. Case Review: Three Service Level Complaints

45 minutes (6:10pm)

7. Auditor Discussion on Policy Complaints

5 minutes (6:55pm)

8. Commendation Highlight

5 minutes (7:00pm)

9. Auditor Report

10 minutes (7:05pm)

10. Public Comment

5 minutes (7:15pm)

11. Closing Comments

15 minutes (7:20pm)

12. Adjourn

7:35 pm

Next Meeting: October 13, 2026

101 E. Broadway Suite 230  Eugene, Oregon 97401
Phone (541) 682-5016  Fax (541) 682-5599
www.eugene-or.gov/policeauditor

INDEPENDENT POLICE AUDITOR'S OFFICE

MONTHLY UPDATE

IN THIS ISSUE:
Auditor’s Update
Community
Engagement | 3
Complaint & Use of
Force Volume | 4
EPD Commendation
Volume | 4
Open & Closed Case
Reports | 5
Upcoming Meetings &
Closures | 9

September Updates
Auditor's Update
During the month of August, our office completed its
lengthy investigation into comments recorded on
Officer Siller’s body worn video. One key conclusion
was that Officer Siller was working alone at the time
and was not speaking to any other EPD employees.
This distinction matters because one of the ways we
receive complaints is through reports made by EPD
staff. Employees who witness misconduct are
required to report it, and failure to do so can result
in additional allegations. In this case, if another
employee had been present during Siller’s
comments, they would have been obligated to report
the behavior.
We also receive complaints directly from the public.
Community members may choose to identify
themselves or remain anonymous. Complaints can
be submitted through our online portal at
eugene-or.gov/policeauditor, by calling us at
541-682-5016, by emailing (cont.)

eugene-or.gov/PoliceAuditor

[email protected]

541-682-5016

[email protected], or in person during our office hours, which are Tuesday
through Thursday, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
In addition, our office can also generate its own complaints. For example, every use
of force is routinely reviewed. If we determine a use of force may be out of policy, we
can initiate an investigation without a complaint from the public.
In upcoming newsletters, I will explain in more detail what happens after a complaint
is received.
Craig Renetzky
Police Auditor

2

2

Community Engagement
During the month of August, we continued to maintain an active presence in the
community by displaying our materials at the two day Aloha Festival at Alton Baker Park,
the Obon & Taiko Festival at the Yujin Gakuen Japanese Language Immersion School,
and Community Night Out, hosted by Homes for Good.
In the month of September, we look forward to tabling at Lane Arts Council's 12th Fiesta
Cultural, taking place on Friday, September 4th at the Farmers Market Pavilion, and the
YMCA's 5th annual Welcoming Festival on Sunday, September 13th.
The Civilian Review Board is back from their summer break and will be meeting on
Tuesday, September 8th, at 5:30 p.m. at the Independent Police Auditor's Office (101 E.
Broadway, Ste. 230). They will be reviewing three service-level complaints and receive a
training on the Internal Affairs process. All meetings are open to the public and can be
attended in person or remotely. Follow our social media pages for updates on upcoming
events, meetings, and relevant news:
• Facebook: www.facebook.com/EugenePoliceAuditor
• X (Twitter): www.x.com/Eugene_IPA
• LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/eugene-police-auditor/
• Monthly Newsletter: www.eugene-or.gov/list.aspx

2

3

Complaint & Use of Force Volume
Our office received 40 complaints in August and reviewed 19 reportable uses of force.
Overall, we have seen an increase in both complaints and uses of force (105
year-to-date, up from 93 at the same time last year).

Commendation Volume
Eugene Police Department employees also received a total of 13 commendations last
month.

4

5

Closed Cases
Report
August 2026
Classification

Allegation of
Misconduct

SubReceived
Disposition
Classification
Date

Performance

05/28/2026

Sustained

Narrative
1)APM 6.7 ATTENDANCE In May 2026,
Communications Specialist A violated the
attendance policy by failing to report for work
and failing to notify a supervisor.
2) APM 6.7 ATTENDANCE In May 2026,
Communications Specialist A violated the
attendance policy by failing to report for work
and failing to notify a supervisor.

Allegation of
Misconduct

Performance

06/01/2026

Sustained

APM 6.7 Attendance
Employee A violated the attendance policy by
failing to report for work and failing to notify a
supervisor prior to the start of the shift.

Allegation of
Criminal Conduct

Conduct

08/10/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

RP stated that an officer inappropriately touched
them during a pat down.

Opened Cases
Report

6

August 2026
Classification

SubClassification

Inquiry

Status

Received
Disposition
Date

Active

08/03/2026

Service Complaint

Performance

Completed

08/03/2026

Dismissed-o/s
jurisdic

Service Complaint

Courtesy

Active

08/03/2026

Supervisor
Review-Closed

Service Complaint

Conduct

Completed

08/04/2026

Dismissed-prev
reviewed

Service Complaint

Performance

Active

08/05/2026

Service Complaint

Service level

Active

08/03/2026

Service Complaint

Service level

Completed

08/07/2026

Supervisor
Review-Closed

Service Complaint

Service level

Active

08/07/2026

Supervisor
Review-Closed

Service Complaint

Performance

Active

08/08/2026

Service Complaint

Use of Force

Completed

08/10/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

Service Complaint

Performance

Completed

08/11/2026

Dismissed-alt
remedy
Supervisor
Review-Closed

Service Complaint

Courtesy

Active

08/12/2026

Service Complaint

Performance

Active

08/12/2026

Service Complaint

Service level

Active

08/13/2026

Service Complaint

Performance

Active

08/17/2026

Narrative
RP complained they were
wrongfully arrested and EPD
officers witnessed inappropriate
interactions with Lane County
Sheriffs. RP also complained EPD
officers used excessive force
during a separate arrest.
RP complained EPD trespassed an
individual without cause.
RP complained they were
wrongfully arrested and an officer
acted improperly.
RPs submitted complaints and
questions regarding a previously
reviewed complaint of an officer's
actions during an arrest.
RP complained a communication
specialist improperly named
Eugene Springfield Fire as two
separate entities during a tone
test.
RP complained about a lack of
timely and effective police
response to their calls for service.
RP complained about a slow and
lack of response time regarding
several incidents involving the
same individual and location.
RP requested additional interviews
be conducted for an
investigation.
RP complained they were
wrongfully detained and the
officer acted improperly.
RP complained that their arresting
officer acted improperly.
RP complained officers acted
improperly and mishandled an
investigation. RP also complained
about a verdict given by the
courts.

RP complained an officer acted
improperly towards them while
observing an investigation.
RP complained an article was
Dismissed-alt
posted about them and was
remedy
inaccurate.
RP complained about a lack of
Supervisor
police response to a call for
Review-Closed
service.
RP complained an officer would
Dismissed-Timelin not allow them to secure their
ess
property during an arrest.

7

Opened Cases
Report
August 2026
Classification

Service Complaint

SubClassification

Service level

Status

Active

Received
Disposition
Date

08/18/2026

Narrative

Supervisor
Review-Closed

RP complained about a lack of
police response to a call for
service.

Service Complaint

Performance

Active

08/12/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

RP complained officers conducted
an improper investigation. RP
also complained later contact with
officers was improper.

Service Complaint

Performance

Completed

08/19/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

RP complained an officer's contact
with them was targeted.

Service Complaint

Performance

Active

08/15/2026

Supervisor
Review-Closed

RP complained officers conducted
an improper investigation.
RP complained about a lack of
police response to a call for
service.

Service Complaint

Service level

Active

08/24/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

Service Complaint

Other

Active

08/25/2026

Dismissed-o/s
jurisdic

RP complained an unknown
individual grabbed them.

08/02/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

RP complained an officer
improperly operated their marked
vehicle.
RP complained officers were
conducting traffic stops on
private property.
RP complained an officer was
patrolling in a park.

Policy Complaint

Completed

Policy Complaint

Completed

08/14/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

Policy Complaint

Completed

08/15/2026

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

Allegation of
Misconduct

Allegation of
Misconduct

Performance

Use of Force

Allegation of Criminal
Conduct
Conduct

08/10/2026

103.5.7(e) Attendance: Officer A
failed to appear in court having
been subpoenaed for a matter
relating to the performance of
their official duties.

Active

08/12/2026

Officer A violated EPD Policy
814.3.1 WHEN TO INITIATE OR
CONTINUE A PURSUIT in that,
given the circumstances present
at the time and during the
pursuit, the requirements to
continue or initiate a pursuit
under EPD policy 814.3.1 were
not present.

Active

08/10/2026

Active

Dismissed-In
Policy/No FU

RP stated an officer
inappropriately touched them
during a pat down.

8

Opened Cases
Report
August 2026
Classification

SubReceived
Status
Disposition
Date
Classification

Narrative
1) Officer A violated POM 103.4.2
PROFESSIONALISM in that they failed
to provide courteous service, and/or
use carefully reasoned discretion,
and/or ensure their conduct is
respectful, neutral, objective, and
unbiased during their interaction with
a suspect.

Allegation of
Misconduct

Performance

Active

08/12/2026

2) Officer A violated POM 103.5.8
COURTESY (a) in that they failed to,
on all occasions in the performance
of their duties or after identifying
themselves as an employee of the
Eugene Police Department, be
respectful, courteous and considerate
toward the public, their supervisors,
their subordinates, and all other
employees.
3) Officer A violated POM 103.5.8
COURTESY (b) in that they
unnecessarily used profanity.
4) Officer A violated POM 103.5.8
COURTESY (d) in that they failed to
use tact in their interactions, control
their temper, exercise patience and
discretion, and not allow themselves
to be provoked by the actions of
others.
5) Officer A violated POM 820.3
PHYSICAL FORCE in that they failed to
make every reasonable effort to
deescalate confrontations to prevent
the need to use force.

Legend
Alt Remedy

Alternate Remedy

EE Not Identif

Employee Not Identifiable

In Policy/No FU
O/S Jurisdic

In Policy/No Follow Up

Prev Reviewed

Previously Reviewed

Outside Jurisdiction

Upcoming Meetings, Events,
and Closures

Follow us to stay informed!

• Sept. 4th - Fiesta Cultural at the
Farmers Market Pavilion

@EugenePoliceAuditor

• Sept. 7th - Office Closed for Labor Day

@Eugene_IPA

• Sept. 8th - Civilian Review Board
Meeting
• Sept. 9th - City Council Returns from
Break
• Sept. 10th - Police Commission Meeting
• Sept. 13th - YMCA's Welcoming Festival

Independent Police Auditor City of Eugene

Contact us:
101 East Broadway, Ste. 230
Eugene, OR, 97401
541-682-5016
[email protected]

Submit complaints &
commendations 24/7
via our Public Portal

9

Civilian Review Board (CRB)
Held in person at 101 East Broadway Suite 230 Eugene, OR 97401
and via Zoom webinar
June 9, 2026
5:30 p.m.
PRESENT: Chair Jose Cortez, Vice Chair Elise Josephson, Clay Neal, Noah Coon, Rick Roseta, and
Joshua Burstein (online)
ABSENT: None
INDEPENDENT POLICE AUDITOR’S OFFICE STAFF: Police Auditor Craig Renetzky, Lindsey
Foltz, Amanda Cordova (online), and Beatriz Otero Hernandez
EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFF: Officer Owen Griffith and Animal Welfare Supervisor
Deb Sporcich
OTHER GUESTS: Eugene Mayor Kaarin Knudson and Former Eugene Mayor Lucy Vinis
Chair Jose Cortez convened the Civilian Review Board (CRB) at 5:34 p.m. He read a land
acknowledgment statement.
1. Agenda and Materials Review
Chair Cortez provided an overview of the agenda.
2. Minutes Approval (Minutes from February and March meetings)
MOTION: Neal moved, Vice Chair Josephson seconded, to approve the May minutes.
VOTE: 6:0:0; PASSED
IN FAVOR: Chair Cortez, Vice Chair Josephson, Clay Neal, Noah Coon, Joshua Burstein, and
Rick Roseta.
3. Comments from Eugene Mayor Kaarin Knudson and Former Eugene Mayor Lucy Vinis
Mayor Knudson and Ms. Vinis acknowledged the tenure of the Independent Police Auditor’s Office
Associate Police Auditor Lindsey Foltz. They both took time describing Foltz’s professional history,
contributions, and positive influence in the community, specifically related to police oversight. Ms. Foltz
first began serving as Associate Police Auditor in January 2022. She was presented with an award.
4. Commission Liaisons
Neal reported from the May Police Commission meeting. He said there was robust discussion about an
incident involving body worn video (BWV) capturing an officer saying controversial remarks. Neal said
the Police Commission has confidence in the way the situation was handled and that the Police Chief’s
response was appropriate. He said there was discussion and minor refinement of BWV policy.
Civilian Review Board

June 9, 2026

1

5. Training: Operations Support Field Units
Eugene Police Department (EPD) Officer Owen Griffith and Animal Welfare Supervisor Deb Sporcich
provided a training on Operations Support Field Units.
Officer Griffith began by speaking about EPD officer placement at the Eugene Airport, which is required
by the Federal Airport Administration (FAA). Most commonly, the officers respond to reports of
disorderly passengers and/or drug seizures.
Officer Griffith described the duties of EPD bailiffs.
Supervisor Sporcich provided information about EPD’s Animal Welfare Unit via PowerPoint
presentation.
Supervisor Sporcich noted that while Animal Welfare Unit officers are not sworn officers, their reports
can result in jail time for animal-related crimes. They respond to dogs at large, sick or injured animals,
dog bites, found dogs, abandonment, abuse and/or neglect, animals in hot/cold cars, livestock at large,
barking dogs, dog waste, and park patrol. She provided further information specifically related to
potentially dangerous dogs (Policy 4.435), animal neglect (Policy 4.340), and animal abuse (Policy
4.335).
Supervisor Sporcich responded to questions from CRB members related to animal welfare and current
regulations within the City of Eugene. She pointed out that many residents are unaware that their dogs
must be licensed with the City.
6. Break
The CRB took a scheduled meeting break.
7. Comments from Board Members
Josephson praised CRB members and staff who are transitioning away from the Board.
Burstein also acknowledged CRB members and staff who are transitioning away from the Board. He
mentioned that the CRB will be represented at an upcoming City Club of Eugene discussion forum.
Roseta recognized Chair Cortez and Associate Police Auditor Foltz.
8. Case Review: Flock
Foltz provided a Eugene Flock Program summary and 2025 timeline (below). She referenced an
additional report detailing a synopsis of the Flock Program and associated complaints.
2025 Timeline

Civilian Review Board

June 9, 2026

2

March: Flock contract signed by City of Eugene
May: Cameras installed, begin collecting data
June: Federal agency searches and nationwide agency searches of Eugene data
July: End of national lookup
August: Only Oregon law enforcement agency searches logged
October: Council voted to turn off cameras
November: Continued searches of data through month
December: City Manager announced that Flock would delete all data and remove cameras – City removed
all cameras
Foltz identified five themes (i.e. concerns) that emerged from both public comment and filed complaints:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Program implementation without public notification or input
Data sharing, searches, security, and misuse
Privacy
Financial burdens and allocations of resources
Data gathering and searches after deactivation

Foltz acknowledged that through her research she learned that she had initially overlooked Policy 1206:
Emerging Technologies Consideration. She noted that community concerns related to the rollout of the
program may have been proactively addressed by following the policy.
Foltz described components of her analysis, including that every search made against EPD data was
logged; yet what information was returned to the agencies was not logged. She reported that search logs
demonstrate that there were 369,662 searches conducted.
She listed the following agencies as having conducted searches: Homeland Security Investigations, US
Border Patrol, US Postal Inspection Service, and national law enforcement agencies. She noted it does not
appear that EPD granted explicit access, but more likely that the searches were possible because of
nationwide lookup features. She added that a spot check of the logs shows that there were searches by
agencies with 287G task force with immigration and customs enforcement, suggesting that there was both
“front door” direct federal agency access and “side door” nationwide agency access to EPD data that
could have been queried for immigration-related purposes. Foltz analyzed search data to demonstrate the
volume, scope, and type.
Regarding privacy concerns, Foltz’s report does not contain legal analysis of claims that Flock violated
community members’ rights to privacy.
Regarding the funding of Flock programs, she noted that the contract was paid for by a grant to improve
policing programs and did not take funding away from other vital community programming.
Foltz provided details about the process and timeline of Flock camera deactivation.
In conclusion, Foltz recommended that the Auditor’s Office be consulted prior to any future
implementation of a similar program, emphasizing a need for effective oversight.
Complaint, Intake, Classification, and Monitoring Discussion
Civilian Review Board

June 9, 2026

3

Responding to a question posed by Neal, Foltz responded that in the past if policy complaints surface a
policy concern, they have been brought to her attention; but they were not in this case.
Neal acknowledged that it is an older policy and considered how to improve the process for the future.
Responding to a comment by Roseta, Foltz clarified that Policy 1204 – Automated License Plate Readers
was implemented after the Flock program started.
Roseta stated that, in his opinion, the privacy concerns are false.
Josephson asked if the Police Commission regularly reviews older policies.
Neal responded affirmatively and provided relevant information.
Responding to a question posed by Josephson, Foltz highlighted the benefits of EPD’s bifurcated
oversight system.
Training and Policy Considerations
Neal recommended reviewing older policies, such as Policy 1206 – Emerging Technology. He also
suggested considering Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration. He emphasized that technology, how it is
organized nationally, and the company itself, is proving to be the cause for the problems, not necessarily
EPD. He recommended receiving community feedback prior to future implementation of programs.
Roseta and Josephson agreed.
Chair Cortez reflected on the use of surveillance and recommended considering weighing efficiency with
and not against public safety.
Coon commented that perhaps if it were a different, localized company there would be less pushback
from residents.
9. Commendation Highlight
Auditor Renetzky highlighted recent coordination efforts leading the removal of illegally possessed
firearms and drugs from city streets, minimizing risks to many children and families, and conducted in a
professional and safe manner.
10. Auditor Report
Auditor Renetzky recognized Josephson for presenting on behalf of the CRB to Eugene City Council. He
acknowledged an Associate Police Auditor vacancy and stated that two individuals are expected to fulfill
the vacancy in July or August. He voiced positive reflections about Foltz’s tenure. He presented
certificates to Chair Cortez and Coon. Auditor Renetzky recognized Otero Hernandez and Burstein for
completing the Citizen Police Academy.

Civilian Review Board

June 9, 2026

4

11. Public Comment
Chair Cortez read the rules of engagement for public comment. He invited individuals to speak.
Hannah Silverman provided comments related to a case reviewed at the previous CRB meeting during
which numerous officers were reported and/or under investigation. She shared her perspective as a
criminal defense attorney. She said one officer was discussed and it was unclear if both officers that were
reported were also investigated. She said law enforcement judgement is crucial; if an officer does not
include or misinterprets the facts, an individual could be subjecellt to charges they would not otherwise
be. Ms. Silverman challenged the appropriateness of the charges and cited discrepancies between the
officer’s written report and their BWV.
Ky Fireside challenged CRB’s neutrality when it comes to EPD. They shared their perspective that EPD
has mishandled a number of situations.
Rob Eller provided comments. He expressed appreciation for members Chair Cortez and Coon, who are
transitioning out of the CRB. He thanked Foltz for her service as Associate Police Auditor and
highlighted her strengths.
Foltz read aloud testimony from a public commenter who wished to remain anonymous. Their comments
focused on concerns with EPD actions and behaviors toward citizens who utilize areas around
Washington-Jefferson Street Bridge. They cited violations of individual’s rights and misuse of cameras.
They suggested that police officers are unfairly targeting the area.
12. Closing Comments
Coon spoke about his positive experiences serving on the CRB.
Josephson encouraged continued public engagement in independent police oversight.
Chair Cortez reflected on the state of the nation and community, as well as his time serving as Chair for
the CRB. He acknowledged fellow Board members, staff, and partners.
Individual CRB members expressed appreciation for exiting CRB members and Foltz.
13. Adjourn
Chair Cortez adjourned the CRB meeting at 7:48 p.m.

Minutes transcribed by Terah Van Dusen, Lane Council of Governments (LCOG)

Civilian Review Board

June 9, 2026

5